Följ oss

Analys

Orange juice: Declining supply meets weak demand

Publicerat

den

Commerzbank commodities research

Commerzbank commoditiesIn oranges and orange juice, the outlook for both supply and demand is dim. Especially in the US, a declining supply will meet with softening demand. Supply concerns were in focus for months, causing prices to rise. But disappointing US consumption data and a lack of strong storms in the south of the US turned the price movement around in the summer. Prices were able to regain ground recently as estimates see Florida’s harvest as from October at a 50-year low and California is supposed to harvest fewer oranges as well. The price for frozen concentrated orange juice, which strongly depends on the US market, will probably continue to fluctuate for a long while, driven by declining supply and similarly declining demand.

Prices for frozen concentrated orange juice on the New York exchange have not been able to sustain their month-long uptrend that was intact until June. Instead, they dropped by more than 15% between the middle of June and the first days of August. Only at the current margin could the quotations regain some ground, rising from 139 US cents to nearly 150 US cents per pound. Though the two-year high of mid-June at 167 US cents per pound is still some ways away (chart 1).

Price development for frozen concentrated orange juice

The focus was therefore very much on the supply side. The month-long price rise until June had been triggered by prospects of a lower US supply. In fact, the last harvest in the US was already unsatisfactory. In its July report the USDA once more reduced its estimate for the 2013/14 US harvest compared to its last forecast from January. It now envisages only 6.3 million tons of oranges, 16% less than in 2012/13 (chart 2). This is the second large consecutive decline. The plant disease citrus greening, which causes the fruit to drop prematurely, still maintains its grip on large parts of the growing regions. As a result of the lower harvest, US orange juice production should come in at 481,000 tons, 20% below 2012/13 levels, which were already lower than in the previous year.

Oranges, US crop productionMoreover, the drought in Brazil spurred doubts as to whether rising production in Brazil would be able to compensate for the decline in the US. For Brazil, the USDA had predicted in January that the 2013/14 orange harvest would increase by 8.5%, but this forecast was cut to 6% in July. This still remarkable rise is largely attributable to high yields. The quantity of oranges used for processing is seen to rise at a similarly strong rate. As a result, Brazil’s orange juice production, which had fallen massively by almost a quarter in 2012/13, is now expected to post a 12% increase.

Unlike global orange production itself, where growth not only in Brazil but also in China will probably more than offset the decline in the US, global orange juice production should stagnate in 2013/14 in the best case according to the USDA. Juice production had already declined in the two preceding years.

However, not only juice production but also the consumption of orange juice is lacking momentum. Global consumption has for years been fluctuating around the mark of 2 million tons (chart 3). Consumption is clearly declining in the US – the most important market alongside the EU. US per-capita consumption of orange juice has reportedly fallen from 46 litres ten years ago to only 35 litres in 2013. According to latest data, US retailers sold 9% less orange juice than one year before in the four weeks ending on 2 August 2014. A wide range of other juices and new developments in other beverages are now competing with orange juice. Also, many consumers prefer beverages with lower sugar content or lower prices. In other developed countries, too, the market for orange juice should be largely saturated. Double-digit growth rates in some other countries, such as China, for instance, cannot reverse this outlook, given the low absolute figures.

Orange juice: No dynamics in demandBut the market is now looking less at the current year 2013/14 than at the coming season. The year 2014/2015 as measured by the USDA begins in October or November in countries in the northern hemisphere. In Brazil, by far the most important country in the southern hemisphere, it even only starts in July 2015. The first USDA forecasts are only expected for autumn. In the US, the orange harvest for 2014/15 should thus get underway in a few weeks. Prospects are far from promising. Estimates are circulating according to which Florida’s orange production, which normally accounts for about 70% of total US production, could fall to less than 90 million boxes of 90 pounds (or 40.8 kilograms) each. This would be less than 3.7 million tons, i.e. the lowest level since 1965. Since according to latest USDA data, Florida harvested 133.6 million boxes in 2012/13 and 104.4 million boxes in 2013/14, this would be a fall by about another 15% compared with the already weak current year. Not all watchers anticipate such a dramatic situation. But there is broad agreement that the harvest will likely remain below 100 million boxes. In California, the only other important growing state in the US, the drought will presumably leave its mark. The situation there has been difficult since 2012 and has become further exacerbated in recent weeks, and more than half of the acreage currently falls in the highest category of “exceptional drought”. The critical outlook for US production has recently given prices a bit of a lift.

It remains to be seen whether in the present situation of weak demand the continuing decline in supply can contribute to noticeable price rises on a lasting basis. We only expect this to happen if supply shortfalls attributable to storms or diseases turn out even larger than currently expected. Fears of a marked hurricane season have driven up prices often already. This year has been relatively calm so far, but the hurricane season only ends in November. Hence, stormrelated crop losses in Florida are still a possibility.

Analys

Unusual strong bearish market conviction but OPEC+ market strategy is always a wildcard

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent crude falls with strong conviction that trade war will hurt demand for oil. Brent crude sold off 2.4% yesterday to USD 64.25/b along with rising concerns that the US trade war with China will soon start to visibly hurt oil demand or that it has already started to happen. Tariffs between the two are currently at 145% and 125% in the US and China respectively which implies a sharp decline in trade between the two if at all. This morning Brent crude (June contract) is trading down another 1.2% to USD 63.3/b. The June contract is rolling off today and a big question is how that will leave the shape of the Brent crude forward curve. Will the front-end backwardation in the curve evaporate further or will the July contract, now at USD 62.35/b, move up to where the June contract is today?

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

The unusual ”weird smile” of Brent forward curve implies unusual strong bearish conviction amid current prompt tightness. the The Brent crude oil forward curve has displayed a very unusual shape lately with front-end backwardation combined with deferred contango. Market pricing tightness today but weakness tomorrow. We have commented on this several times lately and Morgan Stanly highlighted how unusual historically this shape is. The reason why it is unusual is probably because markets in general have a hard time pricing a future which is very different from the present. Bearishness in the oil market when it is shifting from tight to soft balance usually comes creeping in at the front-end of the curve. A slight contango at the front-end in combination with an overall backwardated curve. Then this slight contango widens and in the end the whole curve flips to full contango. The current shape of the forward curve implies a very, very strong conviction by the market that softness and surplus is coming. A conviction so strong that it overrules the present tightness. This conviction flows from the fundamental understanding that ongoing trade war is bad for the global economy, for oil demand and for the oil price.

Will OPEC+ switch to cuts or will it leave balancing to a lower price driving US production lower? Add of course also in that OPEC+ has signaled that it will lift production more rapidly and is currently no longer in the mode of holding back to keep Brent at USD 75/b due to an internal quarrel over quotas. That stand can of course change from one day to the next. That is a very clear risk to the upside and oil consumers around should keep that in the back of their minds that this could happen. Though we are not utterly convinced of the imminent risk of this. Before such a pivot happens, Iraq and Kazakhstan probably have to prove that they can live up to their promised cuts. And that will take a few months. Also, OPEC+ might also like to see where the pain-point for US shale oil producers’ price-vise really is today. So far, we have seen no decline in the number of US oil drilling rigs in operation which have steadily been running at around 480 rigs.

With a surplus oil market on the horizon, OPEC+ will have to make a choice. How shale this coming surplus be resolved? Shall OPEC+ cut in order to balance the market or shall lower oil prices drive pain and lower production in the US which then will result in a balanced market? Maybe it is the first or maybe the latter. The group currently has a bloated surplus balance which it needs to slim down at some point. And maybe now is the time. Allowing the oil price to slide. Economic pain for US shale oil producers to rise and US oil production to fall in order to balance the market and make room OPEC+ to redeploy its previous cuts back into the market.

Surplus is not yet here. US oil inventories likely fell close to 2 mb last week. US API yesterday released indications that US crude and product inventories fell 1.8 mb last week with crude up 3.8 mb, gasoline down 3.1 mb and distillates down 2.5 mb. So, in terms of a crude oil contango market (= surplus and rising inventories) we have not yet moved to the point where US inventories are showing that the global oil market now indeed is in surplus. Though Chinese purchases to build stocks may have helped to keep the market tight. Indications that Saudi Arabia may lift June Official Selling Prices is a signal that the oil market may not be all that close to unraveling in surplus.

The low point of the Brent crude oil curve is shifting closer to present. A sign that the current front-end backwardation of the Brent crude oil curve is about to evaporate.

The low point of the Brent crude oil curve is shifting closer to present.
Source: Bloomberg graph and data, SEB highlights

Brent crude versus US Russel 2000 equity index. Is the equity market too optimistic or the oil market too bearish?

Brent crude versus US Russel 2000 equity index. Is the equity market too optimistic or the oil market too bearish?
Source: Bloomberg graph and data, SEB highlights

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Oil demand at risk as US consumers soon will face hard tariff-realities

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Muted sideways trading. Brent crude traded mostly sideways last week, but due to a relatively strong close on the Friday before, it ended the week down 1.6% at USD 66.87/b with a high-low range of USD 65.29 – 68.65/b. So muted price range action. Brent crude is trading marginally higher, up 0.3%, this morning amid mixed equity and commodity markets.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Strong Chinese buying in April as oil prices dipped. Chinese imports of crude continued to accelerate in April following a surge in March with data from Kepler indicating that Chinese imports averaged near 11 mb/d in April. That is an 18mth high and strongly up versus only 8.9 mb/d in January (FT.com today). That has most certainly helped to stem the rot in the oil price which bottomed at an intraday low of USD 58.4/b on 9 April. It has probably also helped to keep the front-end of the Brent crude oil forward curve in consistent backwardation. The strong buying from China is both opportunistic stockpiling due to the price slump but also rebuilding of oil inventories in general.

Oil speculators are cautious with oil demand at risk as US consumers soon will face hard tariff-realities. But oil market speculators are far from bullish. While net long speculative positions are up 52.2 mb over the week to last Tuesday, it is still only the 15th lowest speculative positioning over the past 52 weeks. The underlying concern is of course the US tariffs which is crippling exports of goods from China to the US with bookings of container freight down by 30% according to Hapag-Lloyd. Bloomberg’s Chief US economist, Anna Wong, is saying that empty shelves in US shops will soon be the reality. Thus US-China trade relations need to be fixed quickly to avoid hard realities for US consumers. The lead-times are long and the current tariffs and uncertainty around these is now risking availability for US consumer goods for the holiday seasons in H2-25. Tariff realities for US consumers are increasingly just around the corner.  ”Rubber will hit the road” very soon and that is when we might see weaker oil demand as well.

Brent crude traded mostly sideways last week though ended down 1.6% in the end.

Brent crude traded mostly sideways last week though ended down 1.6% in the end.
Source: Bloomberg graph and data

Net long speculative positions in Brent and WTI up 52.2 mb over week to last Tuesday but still at 15-week low over past 52 weeks.

Net long speculative positions in Brent and WTI up 52.2 mb over week to last Tuesday but still at 15-week low over past 52 weeks.
Source: SEB graph and calculations, Bloomberg data
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Brent crude is now trading below its nominal 2018-19 average in EUR/barrel terms

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent crude gained a meager 0.65% yesterday with a close of USD 66.55/b. That was not much given that US equity markets rallied 2% yesterday with Nasdaq now is almost back to its pre ”Liberation Day” level. Brent crude is trading unchanged this morning with little impulse to do anything it seems.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Equity markets have gotten a boost along with easing US tariff rhetoric. The Brent crude oil price has however not gotten the same rebound and is today still trading USD 8.5/b lower than its USD 75/b level from 2 April.

Two factors at hand here: Expectations of softer growth and more oil from OPEC+. One is that global growth in 2025 will still take a hit with softer growth and thus softer oil demand growth due to the US tariff-turmoil. Even if rhetoric has eased. The second is that OPEC+ has upped its production plans with a softer market as a result going forward. The latter message to the market happened almost at the same time as the ”Liberation Day” on 2 April.

Spot market still as tight as it was on 2 April. Still, the front-end market is more or less equally tight today as it was on 2 April. The average Brent, WTI and Dubai 1-3mth time-spread is USD 1.4/b today versus USD 1.5/b on 2. April.

The market setup/pricing is thus that the market is still tight, but that surplus will come. Either because global growth will slow due to US Tariff-turmoil or because OPEC+ will add more barrels.

Will OPEC+ resolve its internal quarrels? Worth remembering on the latter is that the latest more aggressive OPEC+ production growth plan is due to internal quarrels over quota breaches by Iraq and Kazakhstan. OPEC+ could potentially ease those growth plans just as quickly if the internal quarrel is resolved.

Brent crude in EUR/barrel is now trading at the nominal level from 2018-2019. That is nominal! Not taking account of any kind of inflation which cumulatively is up 20-30% since primo 2018. The average, nominal Brent crude oil price in 2018-2019 was EUR 59.1/b. The front-month Brent crude oil price is now EUR 58.4/b. And Brent forward 36mth is only EUR 55.5/b and in real terms one could subtract some 5-10% for the next three years from that nominal forward price. Quite sweet for consumers!

Brent has rebounded along with equities (here US Russel 2000 index in orange), but the rebound in oil has become more hesitant the latest days. Brent still trading USD 8.5/b below its pre ”Liberation Day” of USD 75/b

Brent has rebounded along with equities (here US Russel 2000 index in orange)
Source: Bloomberg graph and data, SEB selection

Brent crude forward curves. Today versus 2 April (’Liberation Day’). Still a tight current market but now with expectation that surplus is coming.

Brent crude forward curves.
Source: Bloomberg graph and data, SEB selection

The Brent crude oil price versus the average Brent, WTI and Dubai 1-3mth time-spread. The latter is today on par with where it was on 2 April while the Brent 1mth price is down USD 8.5/b.

The Brent crude oil price versus the average Brent, WTI and Dubai 1-3mth time-spread.
Source: SEB graph and calculations, Bloomberg data.

Brent crude in EUR/b is down to its 2018-2019 nominal price level. Not bad for euro-based oil consumers!!

Brent crude in EUR/b is down to its 2018-2019 nominal price level. Not bad for euro-based oil consumers!!
Source: Bloomberg graph and data

Yearly averages for Brent crude in EUR/barrel. The Brent 1mth in EUR/barrel is today trading below its nominal average from 2018-2019 of EUR 59.1/b. And 36mth forward Brent is trading at only EUR 55.5/b. And that is nominally both ways. Add in some 20-30% inflation since primo 2018 and 5-10% additional inflation next three years. Think real terms!

Yearly averages for Brent crude in EUR/barrel.
Source: SEB calculations and graph, Bloomberg data

Fortsätt läsa

Centaur

Guldcentralen

Fokus

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Populära