Analys
Short term recovery due for platinum and palladium
The green industrialised precious metals – platinum and palladium have started 2020 on a weak footing owing to the spread of the COVID–19 pandemic globally. The price decline for platinum, down-21.0%, has been more severe than palladium -6.83% since the start of 2020. Palladium and platinum are known to derive a large portion of their usage (accounting for nearly 34% and 84% respectively) from the auto industry.
Owing to their extensive use in vehicle auto catalysts, demand for platinum and palladium remains particularly sensitive to economic, industrial and market conditions. Falling demand from the global auto industry due to automotive shutdowns being imposed globally are denting sentiment towards both platinum and palladium. Platinum has a more diverse demand base compared to palladium. In addition to auto demand – jewellery, industrial and investment demand account for about 25%, 28% and 13% of platinum’s total usage, respectively.
However, amidst the COVID-19 crisis, both jewellery and industrial demand are expected to fall further but investment demand is likely to strength amidst the uncertainty. While the weakness on the demand side remains a key focus, we expect attention to increasingly start to shift to the supply side aiding a short-term price recovery.
The slump in auto industry should start to recover in H2 as stringent lockdowns ease
The impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the global automobile industry has been severe as production and sales of motor vehicles have come to a sudden halt globally. In the first quarter of 2020, the EU commercial vehicle market contracted by 23.2% as a direct consequence of March’s substantial slowdown. In March 2020, demand for new commercial vehicles fell by 47.3% across the EU, as measures to prevent the spread of the coronavirus led to the suspension of production at auto manufacturers.
Meanwhile in China, where the epidemic peaked in February, the market is slowly returning to normality. The Chinese automotive market recovered significantly from its prior slump in March. As the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM) reported on 10 April 2020, car sales increased more than fourfold (compared to February) to 1.04mn units. According to reports from the CAAM, the Chinese auto industry regained around 75% of its normal operating level in March. The CAAM expects the vehicle market to continue its recovery in the second quarter although full capacity is only likely to be reached again in the second half of the year. In Europe, assembly lines are now restarting production and the same is expected in North America around mid-May.
As lockdown measures start to ease gradually across the rest of the globe, we expect to see a gradual recovery in demand for the green metals from the auto industry in the second half of the year. However, we remain cautious of end-consumer demand which is anticipated to stay weak as consumer’s propensity to purchase cars will be lower due to the economic impact of the COVID-19 crisis on their purchasing power.
Supply side destruction is likely to have a bigger impact on platinum vs palladium
South Africa’s Platinum Group Metal (PGM) producers have been hit by severe disruptions since the lockdowns have been imposed in April. South Africa produces around 38% of palladium and 75% of platinum globally. In the past, the South African mining industry faced a range of health issues, including HIV infections, and such concerns have always posed a risk to supply. The five-week lockdown in South Africa ordered by President Ramaphosa is expected to come to an end in the coming days.
While producers are attempting to prepare themselves to restart production at the mines again, the police are preventing them due to the spread of COVID-19. This implies that the current market tightness will only last for short duration. However, the process of ramping operations back to normal is likely to take time even after the shutdown period. It is also hard to determine at this stage if a second wave of infections might trigger another round of shutdowns causing supply disruptions to linger for longer. Initially the mines are expected to be allowed to operate at 50% capacity.
Palladium normally occurs as a by-product of platinum mining (South Africa) or nickel mining (Russia). About 40% of palladium’s supply comes from Russia. Supply of palladium appears to be at less of a risk as the world’s largest palladium producer Nornickel from Russia expects the global palladium market to show a small supply surplus this year for the first time in eight years.
This is because demand for palladium has been impacted severely by the COVID-19 led crisis. Nornickel reduced its 2020 estimate of palladium consumption owing to weaker global car sales. Reflecting on 2011, Gokran, the Russian state reserve fund unexpectedly supplied about 750,000 ounces out of its own stockpile which was followed by three years of palladium’s price decline. The caveat is no one knows how big Gokran’s stockpile or whether they would use this current period of weak demand for palladium to build up stockpile.
No substitution so far, despite palladium’s price premium over platinum
The recent price correction has driven the palladium to platinum ratio down from its peak of 3.1x to 2.4x. Despite palladium’s price premium to platinum it is less likely for platinum to be substituted for palladium in auto catalysts. The chief reason for this is platinum’s lower thermal durability which curtails its use in the widespread adoption of three-way catalysts.
The implementation of Real-Driving Emissions (RDE) testing involves stricter test cycles with faster driving speeds and higher engine temperatures which poses technical hurdles to platinum’s adoption in the three-way catalysts. At high operating temperatures experienced in a gasoline car, platinum particles may sinter, resulting in loss of surface area and hence of catalytic activity according to Johnson Matthey. Compared to palladium-rhodium formulations, the effectiveness of platinum-containing catalysts tends to deteriorate more rapidly as they age. While there might be some near-term potential for platinum to substitute some of the palladium used in diesel catalyst, we do not see a substitution effect in gasoline catalysts this year.
Platinum and palladium have witnessed a sharp downward price correction in 2020 owing to weak sentiment emanating from dwindling demand in the auto industry. Intermediate supply disruptions should aid a short-term price recovery for the green metals. The roll out of more stringent emissions standards globally are also likely to require higher content of platinum and palladium per unit of vehicle which should help offset the impact of weaker demand from the auto industry. Platinum’s supply is more concentrated in South Africa due to which platinum appears more exposed to supply disruptions versus palladium. In addition, palladium derives most of its use from the auto industry in comparison to platinum has a more diversified demand base. Platinum stands to benefit more than palladium owing to the prospect of having a more diversified demand base coupled with the exposure to higher supply risks.
Market is starting to take US/Iran headlines with a pinch of salt. Brent crude rose $2.8/b yesterday to an official close of $112.1/b. But after that it traded as low as $108.05/b before ending late night at around $109.7/b. Through the day it traded in a range of $106.87 – 112.72/b amid a flurry of news or rumors from Iran and the US. ”US temporary sanctions during negotiations” (falls alarm). ”We will bomb Iran” (not anyhow),… etc. While the market is still fluctuating to this kind of news flow, it is starting to take such headlines with a pinch of salt.
We’ll see. Maybe, maybe not. The Brent M1 contract is trading at $110.2/b this morning which very close to the average ticks through yesterday of $110.4/b.
Trump with bearish, verbal intervention whenever Brent trades above $110/b it seems. What seems to be a pattern is that Trump states something like ”very good negotiations going on with Iran”, ”New leaders in Iran are great,..”, ”Great progress in negotiations,…”, ”Deal in sight,..” etc whenever the Brent M1 contract trades above $110/b. An effort to cool the market. These hot air verbal interventions from Trump used to have a heavy bearish impact on prices, but they now seems to have less and less effect unless they are backed by reality.
As far as we can see there has been no real progress in the negotiations between the US and Iran with both sides still standing by their previous demands.
Iran is getting stronger while the cease fire lasts making a return to war for Trump yet harder. Iran is naturally in constant preparation for a return to war given Trump’s steady threats of bombing Iran again. Iran is naturally doing what ever is possible to prepare for a return to war. And every day the cease fire lasts it is better prepared. This naturally makes it more and more difficult and dangerous for the US to return to warring activity versus Iran as the consequences for energy infrastructure in the Persian Gulf will be more and more severe the longer the cease fire lasts. Israel seems to see it this way as well. That the war is not won and that current frozen state of a cease fire gives Iran opportunity to rebuild military and politically.
Global inventories are drawing down day by day. How much? In the meantime the Strait of Hormuz stays closed. There is varying measures and estimates of how much global inventories are drawing down. Our rough estimate, back of the envelope, is that global inventories are drawing down by at least some 10 mb/d or about 300 mb/d in a balance between loss of supply versus demand destruction. Other estimates we see are a monthly draw of 250-270 mb/d. The IEA only ’measured’ a draw in global observable stocks of 117 mb in April with oil on water rising 53 mb while on shore stocks fell 170 mb. But global stocks are hard to measure with large invisible, unmeasured stocks. As such a back of the envelope approach may be better.
Oil products is what the world is consuming. Oil product prices likely to rise while product stocks fall. Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR) are predominantly crude oil. Discharging oil from OECD SPR stocks, a sharp reduction in Chinese crude imports and a reduction in global refinery throughput of 6-7 mb/d has helped to keep crude oil markets satisfactorily supplied. But global inventories are drawing down none the less. And oil products is really what the world is consuming. So if global refinery throughput stays subdued, then demand will eventually have to match the supply of oil products. The likely path forward this summer is a steady draw down in jet fuel, diesel and gasoline. Higher prices for these. Then, if possible, higher refinery throughput and higher usage of crude in response to very profitable refinery margins. And lastly sharper draw in crude stocks and higher prices for these. But some 6 mb/d of oil products used to be exported through the Strait of Hormuz. And it may not be so easy to ramp up refinery activity across the world to compensate. Especially as Ukraine continues to damage Russian refineries as well as Russian crude production and export facilities.
Watch oil product stocks and prices as well as Brent calendar 2027. What to watch for this summer is thus oil product inventories falling and oil product premiums to crude rising. Another measure to watch is the Brent crude 2027 contract as it rises steadily day by day as the Strait of Hormuz stays closed and global oil inventories decline. The latter is close to the highest level since the start of the war and keeps rising.
The Brent M1 contract and the Brent 2027 prices and current price of jet fuel in Europe (ARA). All in USD/b
Our back of the envelope calculation of the global shortage created by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Note that 3.5 mb/d of discharge from SPR is also a draw. Note also that ’Forced demand loss’ of 2.5 mb/d is probably temporary and will fall back towards zero as logistics are sorted out leaving ’Price demand loss’ to do the job of balancing the market. Thus a shortfall of at least 9 mb/d created by the closure. More if SPR discharge is included and more if Forced demand loss recedes.
Brent is climbing higher. Front-month is at USD 106.3/bl this morning, close to a weekly high and a USD 9/bl jump from Mondays open. This is the move we flagged as a risk earlier in the week: the market shifting from ”a deal is around the corner” to ”this is going to take longer than we thought”.
Analyst Commodities, SEB
During April, rest-of-year Brent remained remarkably stable around USD 90/bl. A stability which rested on one single assumption: the SoH reopens around 1 May. That assumption is now slowly falling apart.
As we highlighted yesterday: every week of delay beyond 1 May adds (theoretically) ish USD 5/bl to the rest-of-year average, as global inventories draw 100 million barrels per week. i.e., a mid-May reopening implies rest-of-year Brent closer to USD 100/bl, and anything pushing into June or July takes us meaningfully higher.
What’s changed in the last 48 hours:
#1: The US military has formally warned that clearing suspected sea mines from SoH could take up to six months. That is a completely different timescale from what the financial market is pricing. Even a political deal tomorrow does not immediately reopen the strait.
#2: Trump has shifted his tone from urgency to ”strategic patience”. In yesterday’s press conference: ”Don’t rush me… I want a great deal.” The market is reading this as a president no longer feeling pressured by timelines, with the naval blockade running in the background.
#3: So far, the military activity is escalating, not de-escalating. Axios reports Iran is laying more mines in SoH. The US 3rd carrier strike group (USS George H.W. Bush) is arriving with two countermine vessels. Trump yesterday ordered the US Navy to destroy any Iranian boats caught laying mines. While CNN reports that the Pentagon is actively drawing up plans to strike Iranian SoH capabilities and individual Iranian military leaders if the ceasefire collapses. i.e., NOT a attitude consistent with an imminent deal!
Spot crude and product prices eased off the early-April highs on a combination of system rerouting and deal optimism. Both now weakening. Goldman estimates April Gulf output is reduced by 14.5 mbl/d, or 57% of pre-war supply, a number that keeps getting worse the longer this drags on.
Demand-side adaptation is ongoing: S. Korea has cut its Middle East crude dependence from 69% to 56% by pulling more from the Americas and Africa, and Japan is kicking off a second round of SPR releases from 1 May. But SPRs are finite.
Ref. to the negotiations, we should not bet on speed. The current Iranian leadership is dominated by genuine hardliners willing to absorb economic pain and run the clock to extract concessions. That is not a setup for a rapid resolution. US/Israeli media briefings keep framing the delay as ”internal Iranian divisions”, the reality is more complicated and points toward weeks and months, not days.
Our point is that the complexity is large, and higher prices have only just started (given a scenario where the negotiations drag out in time). The market spent April leaning on the USD 90/bl rest-of-year assumption; that case is diminishing by the hour. If ”early May reopening” is replaced by ”June, July or later” over the next week or two, both crude and products have meaningful room to reprice higher from here. There is a high risk being short energy and betting on any immediate political resolution(!).
Down on Friday. Up on Monday. The Brent June crude oil contract traded down 5.1% last week to a close of $90.38/b. It reached a high of $103.87/b last Monday and a low of $86.09/b on Friday as Iran announced that the Strait of Hormuz was fully open for transit. That quickly changed over the weekend as the US upheld its blockade of Iranian oil exports while Iran naturally responded by closing the SoH again. The US blew a hole in the engine room of the Iranian ship TOUSKA and took custody of the ship on Sunday. Brent crude is up 5.6% this morning to $95.4/b.
The cease-fire is expiring tomorrow. The US has said it will send a delegation for a second round of negotiations in Islamabad in Pakistan. But Iran has for now rejected a second round of talks as it views US demands as unrealistic and excessive while the US is also blocking the Strait of Hormuz.
While Brent is up 5% this morning, the financial market is still very optimistic that progress will be made. That talks will continue and that the SoH will fully open by the start of May which is consistent with a rest-of-year average Brent crude oil price of around $90/b with the market now trading that balance at around $88/b.
Financial optimism vs. physical deterioration. We have a divergence where the financial market is trading negotiations, improvements and resolution while at the same time the physical market is deteriorating day by day. Physical oil flows remain constrained by disrupted flows, longer voyage times and elevated freight and insurance costs.
Financial markets are betting that a US/Iranian resolution will save us in time from violent shortages down the road. But every day that the SoH remains closed is bringing us closer to a potentially very painful point of shortages and much higher prices.
The US blockade is also a weapon of leverage against its European and Asian allies. When Iran closed the SoH it held the world economy as a hostage against the US. The US blockade of the SoH is of course blocking Iranian oil exports. But it is also an action of disruption directed towards Europe and Asia. The US has called for the rest of the world to engaged in the war with Iran: ”If you want oil from the Persian Gulf, then go and get it”. A risk is that the US plays brinkmanship with the global oil market directed towards its European and Asian allies and maybe even towards China to force them to engage and take part. Maybe unthinkable. But unthinkable has become the norm with Trump in the White House.
Sommarväder skapar prisrally på elbörsen
Oil product price pain is set to rise as the Strait of Hormuz stays closed into summer
Solkraften pressar elpriserna dagtid
Michel Gubel ger sin syn på oljemarknaden