Följ oss

Analys

How renewable fuels are accelerating the decarbonisation of transport

Publicerat

den

WisdomTree

On 16 November 2022, UK’s Royal Air Force (RAF) Voyager aircraft, the military variant of the Airbus A330, took to the skies for 90 minutes over Oxfordshire. What looked like a routine test flight in its outward appearance was ultimately deemed ground-breaking. Why? It was a world-first military transporter aircraft flight, and the first of any aircraft type in the UK to be completed using 100% sustainable jet fuel.  

Mobeen Tahir, Director, Macroeconomic Research & Tactical Solutions, WisdomTree
Mobeen Tahir, Director, Macroeconomic Research & Tactical Solutions, WisdomTree

What are renewable fuels?

Renewable hydrocarbon biofuels (also called green or drop-in biofuels) are fuels produced from biomass sources through a variety of biological, thermal, and chemical processes. These products are chemically identical to petroleum gasoline, diesel, or jet fuel.

In other words, renewable fuels are sources of energy chemically identical to fossil fuels but produced from domestic, commercial, or agricultural waste (see Figure 1 below).

Figure 1: Converting waste into energy

Waste types and refinery output

Why the excitement?

Renewable fuels, like renewable diesel and sustainable jet fuel, can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by around 80-90% compared to fossil fuels. And because they burn much cleaner, engine filters remain cleaner for longer reducing the need for maintenance. Furthermore, given used cooking oil, vegetable oil, processing waste, and animal fat waste are used as inputs, the production of these fuels reduces biowaste, thereby cutting emissions from landfills.

This makes renewable fuels a key component of the circular economy. Humans have largely operated on the linear model historically when it comes to utilising natural resources. The circular model, in contrast, is much less wasteful and seeks to recycle as much as possible (see Figure 2 below).

Figure 2: The Circular Economy

Circular economy
Source: WisdomTree, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2023

The most exciting thing about renewable fuels is the immediacy with which they can make an impact. The reason why they are referred to as drop-in fuels is that they can replace fossil fuels in internal combustion engines with little or no modification required. So, if supply was abundant enough, forms of transport which cannot be electrified easily like heavy duty trucks, ships, and aeroplanes can be switched across to renewable fuels making a significant improvement to the environmental footprint. According to BP, “A return flight between London and San Francisco has a carbon footprint per economy ticket of nearly 1 tonne of CO2 equivalent. With the aviation industry expected to double to over 8 billion passengers by 2050, it is essential that we act to reduce aviation’s carbon emissions.”

The challenge

Renewable fuels or biofuels are still in their infancy. This means the obvious hurdle to overcome is cost competitiveness with fossil fuels. Cost estimates vary, but figures from the International Air Transport Association (IATA) provide a useful sense for the ballpark. In May 2022, IATA stated that the average worldwide price of jet fuel is about $4.15 per gallon compared to the US average price of a gallon of sustainable aviation fuel, which is about $8.67.

So, roughly double the price of the incumbent polluting technology. This is not a bad starting point at all. Considering how rapidly the cost of energy storage in batteries has fallen in the last decade, renewable fuels could become competitive quite soon if sufficient investment is made and economies of scale are achieved. IATA also predicts that renewable fuels could make up 2% of all aviation fuels by 2025, which could become a tipping point in their competitiveness.

Businesses are acting

Businesses pursuing their own net zero targets have already started exploring renewable fuels to minimise their waste. Darling Ingredients Inc, which produces its trademark Diamond Green Diesel from recycled animal fats, inedible corn oil, and used cooking oil, was chosen by fast food chain Chick-fil-A in March 2022 to turn its used cooking oil into clean transportation fuel.

Similarly, McDonald’s entered into a partnership with Neste Corporation in 2020 to convert its used vegetable oil into renewable diesel and fuel the trucks that make deliveries to its restaurants. According to TortoiseEcofin, both Darling Ingredients and Neste have a net negative carbon footprint given emissions produced by these businesses are lower that the emissions avoided because of their renewable fuels.

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

A final word

Renewable fuels alone will not tackle climate change. No single solution can. But they can help us make meaningful progress. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) emphasises how crucial it is for the world to halve its greenhouse gas emissions this decade to at least have a chance of limiting global warming to 1.5oC. This means that solutions with an immediate effect have an important role to play. Biofuels can cut emissions from waste in landfills and provide much cleaner alternatives to fossil fuels to help accelerate the world’s decarbonisation efforts. They don’t require different engines to be of use. They just need funding to reach scale.

Mobeen Tahir, Director, Macroeconomic Research & Tactical Solutions, WisdomTree

Fortsätt läsa
Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Analys

Soon into the $50ies/b unless OPEC+ flips to production cuts

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent crude fell 3.8% yesterday to $62.71/b. With that Brent has eradicated most of the gains it got when the US announced sanctions related to oil sales by Rosneft and Lukeoil on 22 October.  Just before that it traded around $61/b and briefly touched $60.07/b. The US sanctions then distorted the reality of a global market in surplus. But reality has now reemerged. We never held much belief that 1) The sanctions would prevent Russian oil from flowing to the market via the dark fleet and diverse ship to ship transferee. Russia and the world has after all perfected this art since 2022. Extra friction in oil to market, yes, but no real hinderance. And 2) That Trump/US would really enforce these sanctions which won’t really kick in before 21 November. And post that date they will likely be rolled forward or discarded. So now we are almost back to where we were pre the US sanctions announcement. 

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

OPEC revising (and admitting) that the global oil market was running a surplus of 0.5 mb/d in Q3-25 probably helped to drive Brent crude lower yesterday. The group has steadfastly promoted a view of very strong demand while IEA and EIA have estimated supply/demand surpluses. Given OPEC’s heavy role in the physical global oil market the group has gotten the benefit of the doubt of the market. I.e. the group probably knows what it is talking about given its massive physical presence in the global oil market. The global oil market has also gotten increasingly less transparent over the past years as non-OECD increasingly holds the dominant share of global consumption. And visibility there is low.

US EIA report: US liquids production keeps growing by 243 kb/d YoY  in 2026. Brent = $55/b in 2026. The monthly energy report from the US energy department was neither a joy for oil prices yesterday. It estimated that total US hydrocarbon liquids production would grow by 243 kb/d YoY to 2026 to a total of 23.8 mb/d. It has upped its 2026 forecast from 23.4 mb/d in September to 23.6 mb/d in October and now 23.8 mb/d. For now prices are ticking lower while US EIA liquids production estimates keeps ticking higher. EIA expects Brent to average $55/b in 2026.

IEA OMR today. Call-on-OPEC 2026 at only 25.4 mb/d. I.e. OPEC needs to cut production by 3.7 mb/d if it wants to balance the market. The IEA estimated in its Monthly Oil Market Report that a balanced oil market in 2026 would require OPEC to produce only 25.4 mb/d. That is 3.7 mb/d less than the group’s production of 29.1 mb/d in October.

OPEC+ now has to make some hard choices. Will it choose market share or will it choose price? Since August there has been no further decline in US shale oil drilling rig count. It has instead ticked up 4 to now 414 rigs. A lower oil price is thus needed to drive US production lower and  make room for OPEC+. Down in the 50ies we need to go for that to happen. We think that first into the 50ies. Then lower US oil rig count. Then lastly OPEC+ action to stabilize the market.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Trump’s China sanctions stance outweighs OPEC+ quota halt for Q1-26

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Easing last week and lower this morning as Trump ”non-enforcement of sanctions towards China” carries more weight than halt in OPEC+ quotas in Q1-26. Brent crude calmed and fell back 1.3% to $65.07/b last week following the rally the week before when it touched down to $60.07/b before rising to a high of $66.78/b on the back of new US sanctions on Rosneft and Lukeoil. These new sanctions naturally affect the biggest buyers of Russian crude oil which are India and China. Trump said after his meeting last week with Xi Jinping that: ”we didn’t really discuss the oil”. China has stated explicitly that it opposes the new unilateral US sanctions with no basis in international law. There is thus no point for Trump to try to enforce the new sanctions versus China. The meeting last week showed that he didn’t even want to talk to Xi Jinping about it. Keeping these sanctions operational on 21 November onwards when they kick into force will be an embarrassment for Donald Trump. Come that date, China will likely explicitly defy the new US sanctions in yet another show of force versus the US.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Halt in OPEC+ quotas shows that 2026 won’t be a bloodbath for oil. Though still surplus in the cards. Brent crude started up 0.4% this morning on the news that OPEC+ will keep quotas unchanged in Q1-26 following another increase of 137k b/d in December. But following a brief jump it has fallen back and is now down slightly at $64.7/b. The halt in quotas for Q1-26 doesn’t do anything to projected surplus in Q1-26. So rising stocks and a pressure towards the downside for oil is still the main picture ahead. But it shows that OPEC+ hasn’t forgotten about the price. It still cares about price. It tells us that 2026 won’t be a bloodbath or graveyard for oil with an average Brent crude oil price of say $45/b. The year will be controlled by OPEC+ according to how it wants to play it in a balance between price and volume where the group is in a process of taking back market share.

Better beyond the 2026 weakness. Increasing comments in the market that the oil market it will be better later. After some slight pain and surplus in 2026. This is definitely what it looks like. The production forecast for non-OPEC+ production by the US EIA is basically sideways with no growth from September 2025. Thus beyond surplus 2026, this places OPEC+ in a very comfortable situation and with good market control.

US IEA October forecast for US liquids and non-OPEC+, non-US production. No net production growth outside of OPEC+ from September 2025 to end of 2026. OPEC+ is already in good position to control the market. It still want’s to take back some more market share. Thus still 2026 weakness.

US IEA October forecast for US liquids and non-OPEC+, non-US production.
Source: SEB graph and highlights, US EIA data
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

OPEC+ quotas looks set to rise and US oil sanctions looks set to be toothless

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Down this morning with concerns that US won’t enforce Russian oil sanctions towards China. Brent crude closed up 0.7% yesterday to a close of $65.0/b after having traded in a fairly narrow range of $64.06 – 65.15/b. This morning it is down 0.1% at $64.7/b while the ICE Gasoil crack is down 1% as reports from Trump’s high level talks with Xi Jinping sows doubts about the enforcement of the new US sanctions towards Russia’s Lukoil and Rosneft.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Concerns that US sanctions will create significant friction in crude and product markets. Much focus in the oil market yesterday was on whether the recent new sanctions on Rosneft and Lukeoil would have a material impact on the supply/demand balance in the global oil market. Total CEO, Patrick Pouyanne, said that the market was underestimating the sanctions with three Indian refineries accounting for half of India’s Russian crude oil imports now placing crude oil orders elsewhere. FGE added that there would be massive trade friction over the coming 6-8 weeks with 800k b/d of products and 1m b/d of crude at risk of being stranded at sea in November and December. While Brent crude traded to an intraday low of $60.07/b on 20 October, it is currently only up $3.4/b since its lowest recent close of $61.3/b on 17 October. That is not much in the scale of things. Maybe the market is underestimating the problem as argued by Total and FGE. But Russia and its shadow fleet companions have been hard at work avoiding western sanctions since 2022. Today they are experts at this. Ship to ship transfers of crude to hide that the oil is coming from Russia. Blending Russian crude into other streams. And if Russian crude oil is cheap then there is a lot of profits on the table for willing hands. 

But it is highly unlikely that the US will enforce Russian oil sanctions when it comes to China. Both crude oil and gasoil are down this morning in part because Trump said about his meeting with Xi Jinping that ”we really didn’t discuss the (Russian) oil”. China is one of the biggest buyers of Russian crude oil. Not discussing the new US sanctions with China is a clear signal that these sanctions won’t be enforced. China has been standing up against the US this year on any issue of importance. China’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun stated right after the new sanctions were announced that China “oppose unilateral sanctions which lack a basis in international law and authorization of the UN Security Council”. China won’t be bullied by over something as important as its oil purchases. If Trump tried to push the issue on sanctions on Russian oil versus China he would lose. He would get nowhere. So sensibly enough he didn’t lift the topic at the high level meeting. So China will likely pick up Russian crude cargoes who no one else dare to touch. Naturally at a bargain as well. If at all, the new sanctions are not in effect anyhow before 21 November. And as it said in the sanctions: ”may” and ”run the risk of” be prosecuted. Donald Trump thus stands free to not enforce the new sanctions. And how can he enforce them versus India if he can’t/won’t enforce them versus China. Again, as we said on 24 October: ”Sell the (sanctions) rally..”

OPEC+ likely to lift its December quotas by 137k b/d on 2 November. OPEC+ will on 2 November discuss what it wants to do with its quotas for December. We expect the group to lift its quotas with an additional 137k b/d as it has done the last couple of meetings.

Crude oil at sea rose 69m b over week to 26 October and is up 253m b since mid-August.

Crude oil at sea rose 69m b over week to 26 October and is up 253m b since mid-August.
Source: SEB graph and highlights, Vortexa data, Bloomberg data feed.
Fortsätt läsa

Guldcentralen

Aktier

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Populära