Analys
A moment in markets – Commodity returns can be enhanced

In ‘A moment in markets – Are we in a commodity supercycle?’ the promising environment for commodities, especially sectors like industrial metals, was outlined. But for investors who endorse the case for commodities, portfolio implementation is the natural next step to ponder over. In many cases, having a pure beta exposure to commodities makes perfect sense. In some instances, however, smarter approaches present viable alternatives.
The return breakdown
Investors who are not interested in storing physical commodities are likely to seek synthetic exposures to the asset class. Exchange-traded commodity products are either physically-backed or synthetic, i.e., exposed to futures. When it comes to commodity futures exposure, the total return to investors is as follows:

To avoid getting physical delivery of commodities upon expiry of the futures contract, investors maintain their exposure by rolling their futures position to a contract with later maturity. This process can incur a carry return because futures prices may converge to spot prices over time, i.e., there is a gain or loss in carrying the futures contract up or down the curve. When futures curves are in contango, i.e., prices are upward sloping, roll yield is typically negative and when curves are in backwardation, i.e., prices are downwards sloping, roll yield is typically positive.
A pure beta approach would normally provide exposure to contracts towards the front end of the futures curve. Such strategies tend to do well relative to those that are exposed to contracts further out along the futures curve when commodity prices are in a bull run and the spot return component is dominating total returns. This is because contracts at the front end are closer to the spot price and normally experience higher price fluctuation than those further along the curve. The roll return will, however, depend on the shape of the futures curve.
Optimizing the roll return
In contrast to the front-month approach, a dynamic approach to selecting futures contracts that promises a potentially better roll yield can add incremental value to total returns over a longer period. For example, the Bloomberg Commodity Index (BCOM) approach invests in contracts towards the front end of the futures contract.
In figure 1 the case of aluminium is currently the July 2021 contract. In contrast, the S&P GSCI Aluminium Dynamic Roll Index, which reassesses its exposure monthly and can go further out on the curve, is currently in the December 2022 contract.
Looking at the shape of aluminium’s futures curve, we can observe that while July 2021 faces contango, the curve is in slight backwardation around the December 2022 contract (see figure 1 below).

Certain approaches give exposure to specific points along the futures curve, e.g., the UBS Bloomberg Constant Maturity Commodity Index (CMCI). Each approach has its own merits and investors should take the time to familiarise themselves with the methodology.
The key distinction for a dynamic approach in the current macro environment is that sharp fluctuations in demand and supply conditions in recent months have caused futures curves to frequently change shape. Aluminium’s entire curve at the end of January was in steep contango before becoming much flatter when supply curtailment from Inner Mongolia in March tightened the market. While there is no single formula to predict which approach will outperform when, it is useful to recognise that curves can change shape, and this can have an impact on roll returns.

The deciding factor
With all the options available to investors, the decision comes down to whether the commodity exposure is a strategic or tactical decision. Enhanced approaches aim to add value by improving the carry return and reducing volatility – as longer tenor contracts tend to exhibit less price fluctuation compared to front-month contracts.
The true benefit of smarter approaches that seek to enhance the risk-return profile of commodities becomes apparent over longer periods (see figure 2). Enhanced approaches are, therefore, better suited to strategic investors looking for broad commodities exposure.
/Mobeen Tahir, Associate Director, Research, WisdomTree
Analys
Oil market assigns limited risks to Iranian induced supply disruptions
Falling back this morning. Brent crude traded from an intraday low of $59.75/b last Monday to an intraday high of $63.92/b on Friday and a close that day of $63.34/b. Driven higher by the rising riots in Iran. Brent is trading slightly lower this morning at $63.0/b.

Iranian riots and risk of supply disruption in the Middle East takes center stage. The Iranian public is rioting in response to rapidly falling living conditions. The current oppressive regime has been ruling the country for 46 years. The Iranian economy has rapidly deteriorated the latest years along with the mismanagement of the economy, a water crisis, encompassing corruption with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps at the center and with US sanctions on top. The public has had enough and is now rioting. SEB’s EM Strategist Erik Meyersson wrote the following on the Iranian situation yesterday: ”Iran is on the brink – but of what?” with one statement being ”…the regime seems to lack a comprehensive set of solutions to solve the socioeconomic problems”. That is of course bad news for the regime. What can it do? Erik’s takeaway is that it is an open question what this will lead to while also drawing up different possible scenarios.
Personally I fear that this may end very badly for the rioters. That the regime will use absolute force to quash the riots. Kill many, many more and arrest and torture anyone who still dare to protest. I do not have high hopes for a transition to another regime. I bet that Iranian’s telephone lines to its diverse group of autocratic friends currently are running red-hot with ”friendly” recommendations of how to quash the riots. This could easily become the ”Tiananmen Square” moment (1989) for the current Iranian regime.
The risks to the oil market are:
1) The current regime applies absolute force. The riots die out and oil production and exports continue as before. Continued US and EU sanctions with Iranian oil mostly going to China. No major loss of supply to the global market in total. Limited impact on oil prices. Current risk premium fades. Economically the Iranian regime continues to limp forward at a deteriorating path.
2) The regime applies absolute force as in 1), but the US intervenes kinetically. Escalation ensues in the Middle East to the point that oil exports out of the Strait of Hormuz are curbed. The price of oil shots above $150/b.
3) Riots spreads to affect Iranian oil production/exports. The current regime does not apply sufficient absolute force. Riots spreads further to affect oil production and export facilities with the result that the oil market loses some 1.5 mb/d to 2.0 mb/d of exports from Iran. Thereafter a messy aftermath regime wise.
Looking at the oil market today the Brent crude oil price is falling back 0.6% to $63/b. As such the oil market is assigning very low risk for scenario 2) and probably a very high probability for scenario 1).
Venezuela: Heavy sour crude and product prices falls sharply on prospect of reduced US sanctions on Venezuelan oil exports. The oil market take on Venezuela has quickly shifted from fear of losing what was left of its production and exports to instead expecting more heavy oil from Venezuela to be released into the market. Not at least easier access to Venezuelan heavy crude for USGC refineries. The US has started to partially lift sanctions on Venezuelan crude oil exports with the aim of releasing 30mn-50mn bl of Venezuelan crude from onshore and offshore stocks according to the US energy secretary Chris Wright. But a significant increase in oil production and exports is far away. It is estimated that it will take $10bn in capex spending every year for 10 years to drive its production up by 1.5 mb/d to a total of 2.5 mb/d. That is not moving the needle a lot for the US which has a total hydrocarbon liquids production today of 23.6 mb/d (2025 average). At the same time US oil majors are not all that eager to invest in Venezuela as they still hold tens of billions of dollars in claims against the nation from when it confiscated their assets in 2007. Prices for heavy crude in the USGC have however fallen sharply over the prospect of getting easier access to more heavy crude from Venezuela. The relative price of heavy sour crude products in Western Europe versus Brent crude have also fallen sharply into the new year.
Iran officially exported 1.75 mb/d of crude on average in 2025 falling sharply to 1.4 mb/d in December. But it also produces condensates. Probably in the magnitude of 0.5-0.6 mb/d. Total production of crude and condensates probably close to 3.9 mb/d.

The price of heavy, sour fuel oil has fallen sharply versus Brent crude the latest days in response to the prospect of more heavy sour crude from Venezuela.

Analys
The oil market in 2026 will not be about Venezuela but about OPEC+ cutting or not
Lower this morning as Rodriguez opens for US cooperation. Brent crude is down 1.4% to USD 69.95/b this morning. The acting president in Venezuela, Delcy Rodriguez, has struck a much more conciliatory tone and offered to cooperate with the US. This reduces the risk for an extended embargo on Venezuelan oil exports with oil potentially flowing freely out of Venezuela in not too long if Rodriguez actually do cooperate as the US whishes.

Venezuela is not a big oil producer today. It produced 960 kb/d in November. At the same time it consumes some 400 kb/d with net to the world exports of only 560 kb/d. Supply risk to the global oil market is thus very limited as it stands today.
Venezuela produced closer to 2.4 mb/d in 2015. But years of corruption plus US sanctions has eroded production capacity. Its oil infrastructure is worn down. Engineers who could get jobs in other countries have left.
What makes everyone lift their eyebrows over Venezuela with respect to oil is that it has the world’s largest oil reserves. The idea is that US capital coupled with Venezuelan oil reserves could lead to a major upturn in oil production. But it will require billions and billions of dollar and also time to drive production higher.
China has poured billions into infrastructure in Venezuela with most of it lost due to corruption. While Rodriguez now has opened for cooperation with the US, the corrupt regime under Maduro is probably still fully intact. It may not be all that safe for US oil majors to pour billions in capex into Venezuela.
Venezuela has the potential to produce significantly more oil. But lots of money and time to materialize it. Yes, it has the world’s largest oil reserves, but the world is full of oil reserves. The key question is thus more about where do you want to place your capex? What reserves will yield the greatest returns and the lowest risks versus corruption and geopolitics? Impressions from latest headlines is that US money is already knocking on the door in Venezuela, but it is too early to say whether such a dollar-flow will really materialize in the end or not.
The global oil market in 2026 will not be about Venezuela. It will be about OPEC+ balancing act between oil price and market share. Making cuts or not. The IEA projected in December that the world will only need 25.6 mb/d from OPEC in 2026 versus a production in November of 29.1 mb/d. If the IEA is correct then the OPEC will need to cut production by 3.5 mb/d to keep the oil market balanced.
Brent crude is at USD 69.95/b and OPEC+ confirmed this weekend that it will keep production unchanged in Q1-26. The consequence is that the oil price is heading lower by the week. We expect OPEC+ to shift from ”hold” to ”cut” as Brent crude moves to the low 50ies.
Venezuela crude oil production in mb/d

Production by OPEC versus what IEA projects is needed by the group in 2026.

Global observable oil inventory level according to the IEA in December.

Analys
Brent calendar 2026 on sale for $40.0/b (in 2008-dollar)
A great bearish week last week for the world’s oil consumers. Brent fell 4.1% and closed the week at $61.12/b and not too far from the low of the week at $60.77/b. Continued Russia/Ukraine peace negotiations helped to keep a bearish tone in the market. Renewed bearish outlook for 2026 by the IEA which basically stated that if OPEC want a balanced market in2026 they’ll need to cut production by 3.5 mb/d from current level. On 10 December the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control issued an extension to 17. January of the deadline for compliance to the sanctions connected to Rosneft and Lukoil. The US essentially do not want any disruption to the flow of oil out of Russia. Further extensions again and again is likely with no real disruption to the flow of oil to markets. Except some friction.

The Brent 2026 is trading at $60.7/b at the moment. A great price for the consumers of the world. But not a lot of buying interest it seems. Though we do know that most of our consuming clients just love this price level. Thus on a general basis they’ll buy at this price any day. But outlooks for 2026 oil are of course very bearish (Ref IEA last week) and the general economic and political outlook for 2026 is a real headscratcher for most. So many consumers naturally sit back carefully waiting.
Brent 2026 at $60.7/b is only $40.0/b in 2008 dollar! But to get a sense of how cheap $60.7/b for Brent 2026 really is it is good to take a look at it in 2008-dollar for which the price is no more than $40/b! Of course the price is what it is and 2008 is a long time ago. But still we can’t help being amazed over how cheap it is. Due to incredible, continuous oil productivity since then of course as we wrote about in a recent note. To the joy for consumers and to the despair for OPEC.
Cheap oil and gas is a great vitamin injection for the world economy in 2026. But another aspect of cheap oil in 2026 is of course how incredibly positive it is for the global economy. This is juice and vitamins in bundles! Add in natural gas in the global LNG market which for 2026 is trading at only $53/boe! Down from around $72/boe on average in 2025 (and more than $200/boe in 2022). It will be the lowest cost level for natural gas for global LNG importers since 2021! Add in lower US interest rates and a yet softer USD as Trump gets control of the new Fed chair. This is all juice and steroids for the global economy. If the world also can start to reap productivity rewards from the utilization of AI then that is another positive. So solid economic growth and with it solid demand growth for oil and gas most likely.
Huge surplus in 2026? China will horde and OPEC+ will adjust. And what about the 3.5 mb/d which OPEC will have to cut to balance the market in 2026 according to the IEA? Well, China will likely continue to buy a lot of oil for strategic stock building as huge oil imports is one of its weakest geopolitical points. Building strategic reserves is also a good alternative to FX reserves now that US treasuries are not so much in favor by China and EM central banks. China has to buy something for its $1trn trade surplus and oil for strategic reserves is a natural and easy choice. And, OPEC(+) will cut a bit as well.
OPEC+ has already taken a half-turn as it has shifted from monthly increases to ”no change” in Q1-26. The next message will likely be ”cut”. One should possibly by oil forward before such a message hits the headlines. But of course, if OPEC+ sits back and closes its eyes and do no changes to its production, then the oil price will likely totally crash. We do however think that the group’s eyes are wide open.
OPEC production in mb/d versus IEA’s call-on-OPEC for 2026. To get a balanced market in 2026 the group needs to cut 3.5 mb/d from current level. But the group needs money too and not just market share.

-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanPriset på silver och olja möttes för första gången på över 45 år
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanLars Henriksson om prisuppgången för både guld och silver
-
Analys4 veckor sedanBrent calendar 2026 on sale for $40.0/b (in 2008-dollar)
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedanPriset på silver lyfter som en rymdraket, upp över 10 procent idag
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanInvesterare driver efterfrågan på silver
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedanVertikal uppgång i priset på volfram
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedanEric Strand kommenterar utvecklingen för silver
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedanKopparpriset rusar i höjden, nästan på 100 000 yuan i Kina

