Analys
Agricultural commodities could offer a hedge against inflation


Agricultural commodity prices have been buoyed higher by rising grain and oilseed prices. At a time, when global equities have sold off by nearly 13.88% amidst soaring inflation and tightening liquidity conditions, agricultural commodities are up 26.8%. There are a plethora of supply side issues emanating from the war that are likely to continue to drive prices higher – the rise of protectionism, higher fertiliser costs, changing biofuel mandates and adverse weather conditions to name a few. The Russia-Ukraine war has had ripple effects from disrupting supply chains to raising fertiliser costs.
Rising protectionism buoys agricultural commodities higher
The war-related disruptions have also given rise to protectionism. To cite a few examples in 2022– India, the world’s third largest wheat producer, announced it would restrict wheat exports to manage domestic supplies of the grain, which led to a sharp rise in wheat prices. Indonesia also announced an export ban on palm oil on April 28, but the ban was lifted on May 19 after hundreds of farmers rallied to protest the move. In a tight oil-seeds markets, the initial announcement led soybean oil, an alternative to palm oil, sharply higher.

Higher biofuel blending mandates to bolster demand for corn and soybean oil
Changes in the biofuel blending mandates are also poised to increase demand for agricultural commodities. The US is home to the world’s largest biofuel market. The Biden administration is ordering refiners to boost the use of biofuels such as corn-based ethanol. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is requiring refiners to mix 20.63 billion gallons of renewable fuels into gasoline and diesel this year, marking a 9.5% increase over last year’s target. This will put pressure on refiners to blend more biofuel into their gasoline production this year, resulting in a net positive impact on the biofuels industry. Grains such as corn stand to benefit owing to their high starch content and relatively easy conversion to ethanol. Amidst waning stockpiles of diesel, Brazil is also considering increasing the biodiesel blend to 15% from 10% (i.e. the amount of soybean oil blended into trucking fuel). This has the potential to bolster demand for soybeans at a time when soybeans are already in short supply due to droughts in South America and US plantings trail last year’s pace.
Rising fertiliser costs are weakening demand, in turn lowering yields
The Russia-Ukraine conflict has caused disruptions in fertiliser production and material price increases, which has put farmer margins and agricultural yields at risk elsewhere, driving the prices of most agricultural commodities higher. Russia and Ukraine account for a significant share of the global fertiliser trade. Russia produces 9% of global nitrogen fertiliser, 10% of global phosphate fertiliser, and 20% of global potash fertiliser. It exports more than two thirds of its production of each product. Belarus produces an additional 17% of global potash and exports most of it.
Owing to its high soil quality, Argentina tends to use less fertilisers, but Brazil (the world’s largest importer of fertilisers) of which 85% of its needs are imported, is likely to feel the impact more. Russia alone accounts for 25% of Brazil’s total fertiliser imports. Farmers can also plant more soybeans, which require less fertilisers than corn. The US and global corn balance are set to continue to tighten, which suggests that the current high price environment is set to linger. The high prices and low availability of fertilisers is making farmers reduce usage and is also resulting in lower fertiliser prices similar to the trend witnessed back in 2008.

Speculative positioning garnering momentum among agricultural commodities
According to data from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), net speculative positioning in agricultural commodities has risen considerably since the covid pandemic. Tighter supply coupled with stockpiling by national governments concerned about food security has led to a rise in agricultural commodity prices. Not only has net speculative positioning on agricultural commodities risen versus its own history but also in comparison to other commodity subsectors, as illustrated in the chart below:

Adverse weather conditions impact agricultural commodities
El Niño and La Niña are the warm and cool phases of a recurring climate pattern across the tropical Pacific—the El Niño-Southern Oscillation, or “ENSO” for short. The pattern shifts back and forth irregularly every two to seven years, and each phase triggers predictable disruptions of temperature, precipitation. The current La Niña has been around since October 2021. It has been responsible for the South American droughts, milder weather in Southern parts of US and heavy rainfalls across the Pacific Northwest. There is a 51% chance La Niña could continue into the December to February period, with those odds down from last month’s forecast of 58% according to the US climate prediction centre. The waters across the equatorial Pacific Ocean are expected to stay cool or be close to normal between June and September, which means the influence on weather patterns won’t be enough to disrupt tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic.
Conclusion
Agricultural commodities have posted a strong performance in 2022. Yet there remain plenty of factors that could drive the performance of this commodity subsector even higher. Agricultural commodities are unique owing to their high dependence on weather conditions that make them volatile but also offer diversification benefits.
Aneeka Gupta, Director, Macroeconomic Research, WisdomTree
Analys
Large drop in total commercial petroleum inventories

Brent crude prices have risen by USD 0.8 per barrel so far this week since Monday’s opening. However, prices touched a weekly low of USD 68.6 per barrel on Tuesday before reaching a weekly high of USD 71.20 per barrel this morning.

Last week, U.S. crude oil refinery inputs averaged 15.7 million barrels per day, up by 321 thousand barrels per day compared to the previous week. Refineries operated at 86.5% of their total operable capacity during this period. Gasoline production declined to an average of 9.6 million barrels per day, while distillate fuel production also fell, averaging 4.5 million barrels per day.
U.S. crude oil imports averaged 5.5 million barrels per day, a decrease of 343 thousand barrels from the prior week. Over the past four weeks, imports have averaged 5.8 million barrels per day, reflecting a 10.6% year-on-year decline compared to the same period last year.
Total commercial petroleum inventories fell by a large 6.0 million barrels, contributing to some positive price movements observed yesterday evening and this morning. Although commercial crude oil inventories (excluding the SPR) increased by 1.4 million barrels, this was notably lower than the 4.3-million-barrel build forecasted by the API on Tuesday. With the most recent build included, U.S. crude oil inventories now stand at 435.2 million barrels, down by 12 million barrels compared to the same week last year.
Gasoline inventories decreased by 5.7 million barrels, exceeding the API’s reported decline of 4.6 million barrels. Despite this, gasoline stocks remain 1% above the five-year average. Distillate (diesel) inventories dropped by 1.6 million barrels, compared to the API’s forecast of a 0.4-million-barrel increase, and are currently about 5% below the five-year average.
Over the past four weeks, total products supplied, a proxy for U.S. demand, averaged 20.7 million barrels per day, a 3.9% increase compared to the same period last year. Gasoline supplied averaged 8.7 million barrels per day, showing a modest increase of 0.1% year-on-year. Diesel supplied averaged 4.1 million barrels per day, up by 9.5% from the same period last year. Additionally, jet fuel supplied saw a 1.5% year-on-year increase.
Analys
Crude oil comment: Unable to rebound as the US SPX is signaling dark clouds on the horizon

Held in check within a tight range. Brent managed to stage a small 0.4% gain yesterday. It closed at USD 69.56/b and traded within a range of USD 68.63 – 7.44/b. This morning it is adding another 0.4% to USD 69.8/b. Since 4 March it has closed within a tight range of USD 69.28 – 70.36/b and traded within a slightly wider range of USD 68.33 – 71.4/b.

Depressed by US equity market sell-off saying dark clouds are on the horizon. When we look at the dips to the 70-line and below since late 2021 we see that they have been very brief with little staying power at that level. Bouncing back up very quickly. Just a quick touch. This time however we have been staying down around the 70-line for 6-7 days. Despite the fact that the front-end 1-3mth time-spreads have held up and have not fallen off a cliff.
What stands out with the current selloff versus the previous selloffs is the sharp decline in the S&P 500 index. (SPX) Down 9.3% since 19 Feb. The SPX index is the ”canary in the coal mine”. It is all about the negative fallout from Trump-Tariff-Turmoil and all the other erratic and disrupting actions from Trump. The US equity market is saying that this is BAD for the US economy. And if so, it is usually also bad for the rest of the world in the old sense that ”when the US sneezes the rest of the world catches a cold”.
The implication of this is that if we now get an equity market rebound, then we are likely to get an oil price rebound as well since that is what seems to hold back the Brent crude oil price at the current level.
To all we can see however, Donald Trump does not seem to back off. He is steamrolling ahead. Drugged by his own power and assumed infallibility. The fear by investors which the SPX index is signaling aren’t going to go away except for temporary rebounds. Instead, we are likely to see increasing negative readings in a range of macro variables going forward as a consequence of what Trump is currently doing. The single reason for why we at all doubt that this will be the case is because we have never, ever seen anything like this out of the US in some 100 years or more.
US EIA says, ”all is good” while US oil veteran says, ”prepare for USD 50-60/b”. The US EIA ydy published its monthly oil market report (STEO). It projects a smaller surplus in 2025 with Brent crude averaging USD 74/b this year and USD 68/b next year. Fundamental to this forecast is that all is good and well with global oil demand growing by 1.4 mb/d this year and by 1.6 mb/d in 2026. No negative fallout with respect to global oil demand there reflecting the potential negative economic fallout from Trump-Turmoil.
The US shale oil pioneer Scott Sheffield on the other hand says that ”you’ve really got to hunker down” and prepare for oil to drop to USD 50-60/b as non-US production grows while China demand peaks. That is even without taking any note on possible negative fallout from current Trump actions. What Scott is saying here is echoed by the US Energy Secretary Chris Wright, the previous CEO of Liberty Energy, North America’s second largest hydraulic fracturing company, who has recently said that we’ll likely see a period of industry disruption ahead similar to the price war between OPEC and US shale oil producers in 2014.
These statements from US shale oil veterans in combination with the current vote of no confidence by US equity investors should be taken very seriously.
But then OPEC+ is always a wildcard and can counter oil price declines due to global macro weakness quite quickly as the group today meets on a regular monthly basis.

The Brent 1mth contract has been trading in a very tight range and for significant longer than the previous dips to the 70-line since late 2021 which lasted for only a day or two.

The Brent crude 1mth contract is probably currently held down and in check just below the 70-line because of the ”canary in the coal mine” SPX selloff signaling dark clouds on the horizon.

Analys
Crude oil comment: Not so fragile yet. If it was it would have sold off more yesterday

If the oil market was inherently bearishly fragile it should have sold off much more yesterday. Brent crude fell 1.5% yesterday to USD 69.28/b amid an overall very bearish market sentiment where the SPX index fell 2.7% amid increasing concerns for the damages Trump is doing to the US economy and the increasing risks for a US recession with Trump himself saying that a recession is possible but that in the longer-term everything will be better. Amid such an overall bearish market sentiment one could argue that the 1.5% decline in Brent crude yesterday was a fairly limited decline. Maybe because Brent has sold off so extensively since mid-January and thus has taken out a lot of downside action already. This morning Brent is up 0.3% to USD 69.5/b. Though still below the magical USD 70/b, but not much. If the oil market was inherently bearishly fragile it should have sold off much more yesterday.
A weakening of the 1-3mth time-spreads probably needed for Brent 1M to move lower. The 1-3mth time-spreads are holding quite steady. No rapid deterioration to be seen yet. And the flat price Brent 1mth contract is trading weakly versus the average 1-3mth time-spread of Brent, WTI and Dubai with Dubai the strongest. To see further aggressive downside price action, we probably need to see further deterioration in the front-end time-spreads.
A period of industry disruption ahead says US Energy secretary. The US Energy secretary Chris Wright has told the Financial Times that we’ll likely see a period of industry disruption ahead similar to the price war between OPEC and US shale oil producers in 2014. But that the US shale oil industry will come out stronger and with much lower costs than before. This is definitely not what the market is pricing in today. It can only take place if either OPEC+ or US shale oil producers boosts production or if we get a global recession. OPEC+ looks set for a controlled and gradual lifting of production and US shale oil players looks set for a very careful production growth. With such signals from Crish Wright one should think that US shale oil players will play an even more defensive game in fear of possibly tumbling prices. The signals from Crish Wright are chilling to say the least, but it is highly unclear how he is going to pull it off.
Brent 1mth has taken out the USD 68.68/b but has still not followed through to yet lower levels than the recent USD 68.33/b.

1-3mth time spreads of Brent, WTI and Dubai have recovered since mid-Feb and are holding out quite strongly. No deterioration to been seen at the moment.

The average 1-3mth time-spreads of Brent, WTI and Dubai versus the Brent 1mth contract.

The average Brent 1mth price at current 1-3mth time-spreads at current level historically.

-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Hemp Innovation skriver off-take-avtal för industriell hampafiber
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Christian Kopfer om guld, olja och stål
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
I mars offentliggör EU en lista på prioriterade gruvprojekt, betydelsefullt för Norra Kärr
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Stronger inventory build than consensus, diesel demand notable
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
70 procent av världens koboltproduktion exportstoppas i fyra månader
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Price reaction driven by intensified sanctions on Iran
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
First Nordic Metals ska noteras på First North i Sverige
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Eric Strand kommenterar vad som händer med guld och silver