Analys

Short term recovery due for platinum and palladium

Publicerat

5 år sedan

den

23 maj, 2020

Redaktionen

The green industrialised precious metals – platinum and palladium have started 2020 on a weak footing owing to the spread of the COVID–19 pandemic globally. The price decline for platinum, down-21.0%, has been more severe than palladium -6.83% since the start of 2020. Palladium and platinum are known to derive a large portion of their usage (accounting for nearly 34% and 84% respectively) from the auto industry.

Owing to their extensive use in vehicle auto catalysts, demand for platinum and palladium remains particularly sensitive to economic, industrial and market conditions. Falling demand from the global auto industry due to automotive shutdowns being imposed globally are denting sentiment towards both platinum and palladium. Platinum has a more diverse demand base compared to palladium. In addition to auto demand – jewellery, industrial and investment demand account for about 25%, 28% and 13% of platinum’s total usage, respectively.

However, amidst the COVID-19 crisis, both jewellery and industrial demand are expected to fall further but investment demand is likely to strength amidst the uncertainty. While the weakness on the demand side remains a key focus, we expect attention to increasingly start to shift to the supply side aiding a short-term price recovery.

Palladium versus platinum prices — Source: Bloomberg, WisdomTree, data available as of close 30 April 2020.

The slump in auto industry should start to recover in H2 as stringent lockdowns ease

The impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the global automobile industry has been severe as production and sales of motor vehicles have come to a sudden halt globally. In the first quarter of 2020, the EU commercial vehicle market contracted by 23.2% as a direct consequence of March’s substantial slowdown. In March 2020, demand for new commercial vehicles fell by 47.3% across the EU, as measures to prevent the spread of the coronavirus led to the suspension of production at auto manufacturers.

Meanwhile in China, where the epidemic peaked in February, the market is slowly returning to normality. The Chinese automotive market recovered significantly from its prior slump in March. As the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM) reported on 10 April 2020, car sales increased more than fourfold (compared to February) to 1.04mn units. According to reports from the CAAM, the Chinese auto industry regained around 75% of its normal operating level in March. The CAAM expects the vehicle market to continue its recovery in the second quarter although full capacity is only likely to be reached again in the second half of the year. In Europe, assembly lines are now restarting production and the same is expected in North America around mid-May.

As lockdown measures start to ease gradually across the rest of the globe, we expect to see a gradual recovery in demand for the green metals from the auto industry in the second half of the year. However, we remain cautious of end-consumer demand which is anticipated to stay weak as consumer’s propensity to purchase cars will be lower due to the economic impact of the COVID-19 crisis on their purchasing power.

Global auto sales growth — Source: Bloomberg, WisdomTree, data available as of close 30 April 2020.

Supply side destruction is likely to have a bigger impact on platinum vs palladium

South Africa’s Platinum Group Metal (PGM) producers have been hit by severe disruptions since the lockdowns have been imposed in April. South Africa produces around 38% of palladium and 75% of platinum globally. In the past, the South African mining industry faced a range of health issues, including HIV infections, and such concerns have always posed a risk to supply. The five-week lockdown in South Africa ordered by President Ramaphosa is expected to come to an end in the coming days.

While producers are attempting to prepare themselves to restart production at the mines again, the police are preventing them due to the spread of COVID-19. This implies that the current market tightness will only last for short duration. However, the process of ramping operations back to normal is likely to take time even after the shutdown period. It is also hard to determine at this stage if a second wave of infections might trigger another round of shutdowns causing supply disruptions to linger for longer. Initially the mines are expected to be allowed to operate at 50% capacity.

Palladium normally occurs as a by-product of platinum mining (South Africa) or nickel mining (Russia). About 40% of palladium’s supply comes from Russia. Supply of palladium appears to be at less of a risk as the world’s largest palladium producer Nornickel from Russia expects the global palladium market to show a small supply surplus this year for the first time in eight years.

This is because demand for palladium has been impacted severely by the COVID-19 led crisis. Nornickel reduced its 2020 estimate of palladium consumption owing to weaker global car sales. Reflecting on 2011, Gokran, the Russian state reserve fund unexpectedly supplied about 750,000 ounces out of its own stockpile which was followed by three years of palladium’s price decline. The caveat is no one knows how big Gokran’s stockpile or whether they would use this current period of weak demand for palladium to build up stockpile.

No substitution so far, despite palladium’s price premium over platinum

The recent price correction has driven the palladium to platinum ratio down from its peak of 3.1x to 2.4x. Despite palladium’s price premium to platinum it is less likely for platinum to be substituted for palladium in auto catalysts. The chief reason for this is platinum’s lower thermal durability which curtails its use in the widespread adoption of three-way catalysts.

The implementation of Real-Driving Emissions (RDE) testing involves stricter test cycles with faster driving speeds and higher engine temperatures which poses technical hurdles to platinum’s adoption in the three-way catalysts. At high operating temperatures experienced in a gasoline car, platinum particles may sinter, resulting in loss of surface area and hence of catalytic activity according to Johnson Matthey. Compared to palladium-rhodium formulations, the effectiveness of platinum-containing catalysts tends to deteriorate more rapidly as they age. While there might be some near-term potential for platinum to substitute some of the palladium used in diesel catalyst, we do not see a substitution effect in gasoline catalysts this year.

Platinum and palladium have witnessed a sharp downward price correction in 2020 owing to weak sentiment emanating from dwindling demand in the auto industry. Intermediate supply disruptions should aid a short-term price recovery for the green metals. The roll out of more stringent emissions standards globally are also likely to require higher content of platinum and palladium per unit of vehicle which should help offset the impact of weaker demand from the auto industry. Platinum’s supply is more concentrated in South Africa due to which platinum appears more exposed to supply disruptions versus palladium. In addition, palladium derives most of its use from the auto industry in comparison to platinum has a more diversified demand base. Platinum stands to benefit more than palladium owing to the prospect of having a more diversified demand base coupled with the exposure to higher supply risks.

Relaterade ämnen:palladium platium wisdomtree

Nästa

Prices pull back as market awaits OPEC+ and demand signals

Missa inte

The crude oil market in June – Less of a crowded place

Fortsätt läsa

Annons

Analys

Crude oil comment: A little sideways with new tests towards the 80-line likely

Publicerat

1 dag sedan

den

17 januari, 2025

Redaktionen

Brent moves into sideways trading around USD 81.5/b with new tests to the 80-line likely. Brent crude traded down 0.9% yesterday to a close of USD 81.29/b and traded as low as USD 80.39/b within the day. This morning it is gaining 0.3% to USD 81.6/b. No obvious major driver for that and the move in oil is well in line with higher industrial metals this morning. The technical picture for Brent 1M is still overbought in terms of RSI at 70.2. But as Brent now has traded a bit sideways for some days the overbought bearish calculus has started to ease a bit. But new tests towards the 80-line seems likely with current RSI at 70.2.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Scott Bessent says he fully supports harder sanctions on Russian oil exports if Donald Trump wishes to use such a tool in the coming negotiations with Russia over Ukraine. That may add some support to oil this morning. The latest US sanctions towards Russia clearly have an effect with one example being the tanker Bhilva which has made a U-turn back towards Russia after having been on course to India (Bloomberg).

US EIA projects US liquids growth of 538 kb/d/y in 2025. The US EIA released its monthly STEO report earlier this week. What is clear is that the boom-years in US oil production are behind us for now. But exactly pinning down at what level US oil production will grow in 2025 is hard. The EIA forecast for US hydrocarbon liquids looks the following:

Estimated US crude oil production growth is projected to be virtually zero in 2026. But including all sources of liquids it still sums up to 312 kb/d y/y in growth. A lot or a little? If global oil demand in 2026 only grows with 1 mb/d in 2026, then the US will cover 30% of global demand growth. That is a lot. For 2025 the EIA expects a total growth in US liquids of 538 kb/d y/y.

Smaller losses in existing shale oil production. If we instead look at EIA estimates for US shale oil production right here and now and how its components are changing, we see that 1) New monthly production is 666 kb/d, 2) Losses in existing production is 622 kb/d and thus 3) Net monthly growth is 44 kb/d m/m which equals 4) A net marginal annualized growth of 12*44 of 523 kb/d/y. What stands out here is that the EIA in its December report estimated that this marginal annualization only equated to 378 kb/d/y. So, it has been lifted markedly in the latest report. It is however on a downward trajectory and as such the EIA estimate in the table above of y/y growth for US crude oil of 331 kb/d/y may be sensible.

US shale oil new production, losses in existing production, net new production and marginal, annualized production growth in kb/d/y.

Change in EIA STEO forecast from Dec-24 to Jan-25. What stands out is that estimated losses in existing production is adjusted lower by 16.8 kb/d since November. That is the marginal monthly change. In other words, production in existing production is falling less agressively than estimated in December. But a monthly decline of 622 kb/d/m is of course still massive.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Crude oil comment: The rally has legs, but it takes time to wash out ingrained bearish sentiment from H2-24

Publicerat

2 dagar sedan

den

16 januari, 2025

Redaktionen

Brent crude jumped jet another 2.7%. Brent crude jumped 2.7% yesterday to USD 82.03/b following a pull-back on Tuesday. Intraday it reached USD 82.63/b and its highest level since 26 July last year. Bullish US oil inventory data was a key reason for the jump higher yesterday coming on top of a steady tightening market since early December and fresh US sanctions on Russia last week.

US crude stocks down 17.6 mb since mid-November and total US commercial stocks down 65 mb since mid-July. US crude stocks fell 2 mb last week to its lowest level since April 2022. US crude stocks have declined every week since mid-November with a total of 17.6 mb. Total US commercial oil inventories fell 3.4 mb last week and have been in steady decline of close to 300 kb/d since early July. These declines in US oil stocks are the proof of the pudding in terms of the balance of the global oil market and explains well the rising oil prices since early December.

The IEA estimates a 400 kb/d deficit in H2-24. If so, then all global draws took place in the US. The IEA released its monthly Oil Market Report (OMR) yesterday with an estimate that the global oil market ran a deficit of about 400 kb/d through H2-24. If so, then close to all inventory draws in the whole world solely took place in US inventories which drew down by around 300 kb/d. That is hard to believe.

If we assume that US inventory draws were proportional to the US demand share of the world (about 20%), then global inventory draws in H2-24 probably was closer to 0.3/20% which equals 1.5 mb/d. Maybe a bit high but estimates by FGE indicates that global inventory draws were close to 1.0 mb/d in H2-24 depending on whether you equate on apparent demand or real demand. Higher if equated on real demand.

IEA surplus in 2025 is adjusted down by 200 kb/d. In reality it is now only a surplus of 400 kb/d. We think this surplus estimate will erode further as demand will be adjusted yet higher and supply will be adjusted yet lower going forward. The IEA adjusted 2024 demand higher by 100 kb/d with base effect to 2025 with the same. It also adjusted its non-OPEC production estimate for 2025 down by 100 kb/d. The effect was that call-on-OPEC rose by 200 kb/d for 2025. The IEA still estimates that OPEC must reduce its production by 0.6 mb/d in 2025 to keep market balanced and prices steady. But within that estimate it assumes that FSU increases production by 200 kb/d as if it is not a part of OPEC+. IEA estimate for call-on-OPEC+ thus only declines by 400 kb/d y/y in 2025. We think that this surplus will evaporate as: 1) US production will likely deliver a bit lower than expected. 2) Supply will also disappoint here and there around the world. 3) Global demand estimates will be revised higher for 2024 and 2025.

The rally thus has legs, but the technical picture is still in overbought territory so there will be some pullbacks on the way higher. Unless of course we rally all the way to USD 95/b and THEN we get the technical pullback. The market still seems to have bearish skepticism deeply ingrained in its back following H2-24 doom and gloom and is partially reluctant to trade higher. But that is attitude and not fundamentals.

The Dubai 1-3 mth time-spread is going through the roof as Asian buyers scrambles for supply from the Middle East.

The average 1-3 mth time-spread of Dubai, Brent and WTI is now way up. Lots of room for Brent 1M to move USD 90-95/b

US crude stocks declined by 2 mb last week and total commercial stocks by 3.4 mb.

US commercial crude and product stocks in steady decline since June/July last year. Down 65 mb since mid-July.

US crude stocks at lowest level since 2022.

Brent 1M still overbought with RSI at 72.5. So, pullbacks will happen but from what level. On the upside the next targets are probably USD 87.95/b and USD 92.18/b.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Crude oil comment: Fundamentally very tight, but technically overbought

Publicerat

4 dagar sedan

den

14 januari, 2025

Redaktionen

Technical pullback this morning even as the dollar weakens. Brent crude gained another 1.6% yesterday with a close at USD 81.01/b and an intraday high of USD 81.68/b which was the highest level since mid-August. The gain yesterday was supported by strong, further gains in the 1-3 mth time-spreads. This morning Brent is pulling back 0.6% to USD 80.5/b even though the USD is weakening 0.4% while time-spreads are strengthening even further. This makes it look like a technical pullback.

Brent is trading very weak versus current time-spreads. The current price of Brent crude at USD 80.6/b is very low versus where the 1-3 mth time spreads are trading. Brent should typically have traded somewhere between USD 80-95/b with current time-spreads when we compare where this relationship has been trading since the start of 2023. Brent is now trading in the absolute lower range of that with lots of room on the upside.

How long will the new sanctions last? Natural questions are: How long will Donald Trump leave the new sanctions operational? How strictly will they be enforced? How easily could Russia circumvent them?

A bullish H1-25 if Donald Trump leaves sanctions intact to negotiate over Ukraine. If Brent continues to trade around USD 80/b and not much higher, then the underlying assumptions must be that the new sanctions will not be enforced harshly and that they will be lifted by Donald Trump within a couple of months max. Donald Trump could however keep them in place as a leverage versus Putin in the upcoming negotiations over Ukraine. If so, they could stay intact for maybe 6 months or more which would put H1-2025 on a very bullish footing.

Fundamentally very tight, but technically overbought. Market right now looks technically overbought with RSI at 72 but also fundamentally very tight with the Dubai 1-3 mth time-spread at USD 2.74/b, its highest level since September 2023. As such the Brent crude oil price has the potential to coil up for further gains following some washing out of technically overbought dynamics. But maybe the current Asian panic over access to medium sour crude oil fades a bit over time and time-spreads ease with it.

Brent has been on a strengthening path well before the new sanctions. Worth remembering though is that Brent crude has been on a rising trend along with tightening time-spreads since early December. The latest bullishness from new US sanctions comes on top of that. Brent moving higher into the 80ies thus seems highly likely following a near term washout of technical overbought dynamics.

1-3 mth time-spread (average of Dubai, Brent and WTI spreads) versus the Brent 1M price. Very strong, bullish signals from the time-spreads, but Brent 1M is trading at the very lower level of where this relationship has been since the start of 2023. So, plenty of room for Brent 1M to move higher.

Brent 1M is technically overbought with RSI at 73. Pullbacks are likely near term to wash that out. On the low side the USD 70/b line has given solid support since mid-2023.