Analys
SHB Råvarukommentar 19 februari 2016

OLJA
Brentoljan ser ut att sluta veckan i princip oförändrad, vilket dock döljer stor volatilitet i spåren av avtalet om att frysa produktionen. En uppgörelse mellan Saudiarabien, Ryssland, Venezuela och Qatar fick priset att stiga med 7% i onsdags. Vi bedömer att den prisuppgång som skett är en riskpremie för att Iran eller Irak ansluter sig. Saudiarabien fryser sin produktion på rekordnivåer men kungadömet konsumerar säsongsmässigt mer olja för kylbehov under sommaren och därmed finns det en risk att exporten blir något mindre under sommarmånaderna med avtalet på plats. Det kan dock komma att kompenseras av lägre konsumtion i spåren av budgetunderskott och senaste nedskärningarna på subventioner i el, vatten och petroleum.
Även Ryssland fryser på rekordnivåer men Ryssland har inte förutsättningar att öka produktionen under sanktionerna. Bibehållen produktion vore en positiv överraskning. Med budgetunderskott tror vi att fallande produktion ändå kan leda till stigande export, till priset av minskad inhemsk konsumtion.Qatar har relativt liten oljeproduktion, men är världens största exportör av naturgas som prisas mot olja. Qatar vill därför alltid medverka i prisstärkande aktiviteter på olja då inkomstbortfallet kompenseras flerfaldigat i högre pris på naturgasexporten. För Iran är det otänkbart att frysa produktionen då landet har ambitioner att återta sin förlorade marknad under sanktionerna men självklart kommer landet uttala sig positivt till att andra fryser.
Irak har relativt stora planer på att expandera produktionen i år. Projekten är redan upphandlade och under utbyggnad vilket gör att de inte går att avbryta. Att minska befintlig produktion samtidigt som man bygger ut ny verkar inte rimligt. Irak har också varit undantaget OPEC:s produktionskvot, när den fanns, för att kunna återuppbygga produktionen efter USA invasionen 2003.
Sammantaget tycker vi inte att avtalet har någon större innebörd och ser en risk att riskpremien från att Iran eller Irak ska ansluta sig till avtalet pyser ut nästa vecka. En viss riskpremie ser vi dock som motiverad av att Ryssland faktiskt slutit avtal med OPEC.
EL
Elpriset som fallit kraftigt under inledningen av året, -17 procent för Q216, vände denna vecka upp med närmare 2 euro till 16.50. Kallare väderutsikter framöver i kombination med stigande pris på tysk baskraft samt fossila bränslen är det som främst drivit uppgången. Även om de fossila bränslena fått stöd av den lite bredare uppgången befinner sig dock både kolet och gasen i en stark nedåtgående trend, kol har fallit 68% sedan toppen 2011 och gaspriset har nästan halverats. Svårt att se att någon av dessa faktorer kan generera någon större uppgång och inte heller från den hydrologiska balansen som visar på närmare 10 TWh överskott, men med stöd från en del ”bargain hunting” kan elpriset stiga ytterligare någon från dessa förhållandevis låga nivåer.
Guld
Guldpriset har fallit något under veckan när börsen rusat men har fortfarande stigit över 15% under 2016. Amerikanska centralbanken har tagit notis om senaste marknadsoron och marknaden har nu helt tappat tron på fler räntehöjningar det här året. Ytterligare räntehöjningar från Fed kan bromsa en uppgång för guldpriset, så en mindre hökaktig amerikansk centralbank är positivt.
Vi är fortsatt positiva på guld i den finansiellt oroliga miljö vi har, och guldet har i år stigit på egna meriter, inte enbart på en dollarförsvagning.
Basmetaller
Basmetaller har stigit över veckan, främst nickel som är upp med 7%. Huvudsakligen drivit av en omvändning i sentimentet kring råvaror men också förhoppningar om mer stimulanser i Kina efter svag makrodata.
Teknisk analys: Zink
Zink började året med en större uppgång från 1450-nivån. Den första uppgångsfasen ser ut att vara avslutad vid 1767, varefter zink har rekylerat. Rekylen stannade vid 38% rekyl av uppgången, en relativt vanlig fibonaccinivå. Detta skulle kunna innebära att rekylen ner är färdig och att zink kan vara på gång att göra en ny uppgångsfas. Ett vanligt samband för uppgångarna är att vi får en lika lång upprörelse som vi redan sett, vilket i det här fallet skulle innebära ett möjligt mål runt 1960 USD per ton.
Ett möjligt problem med detta scenario är att den första rekylen på en uppgång ofta är mer än 38%, det är vanligare med 50% eller 62% rekyl. Detta skulle kunna innebära att idén att zink har mer uppsidepotential är korrekt, men att rekylen ner på den första uppgången inte är färdig. Dock var många av rekylerna uppåt i zinks tidigare nedgång också av ganska beskedlig magnitud, vilket skulle kunna vara ett argument för att det kanske räcker med den rekyl vi har sett.
Utifrån ett tekniskt perspektiv anser vi zink köpvärd kring dagens nivå vid 1640 USD per ton, med en stopploss under den senaste botten vid 1640 USD med ett mål runt 1960 USD om uppgångsscenariot är korrekt.
LME Zink, 4 timmarsgraf
[box]SHB Råvarukommentar är producerat av Handelsbanken och publiceras i samarbete och med tillstånd på Råvarumarknaden.se[/box]
Ansvarsbegränsning
Detta material är producerat av Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ) i fortsättningen kallad Handelsbanken. De som arbetar med innehållet är inte analytiker och materialet är inte oberoende investeringsanalys. Innehållet är uteslutande avsett för kunder i Sverige. Syftet är att ge en allmän information till Handelsbankens kunder och utgör inte ett personligt investeringsråd eller en personlig rekommendation. Informationen ska inte ensamt utgöra underlag för investeringsbeslut. Kunder bör inhämta råd från sina rådgivare och basera sina investeringsbeslut utifrån egen erfarenhet.
Informationen i materialet kan ändras och också avvika från de åsikter som uttrycks i oberoende investeringsanalyser från Handelsbanken. Informationen grundar sig på allmänt tillgänglig information och är hämtad från källor som bedöms som tillförlitliga, men riktigheten kan inte garanteras och informationen kan vara ofullständig eller nedkortad. Ingen del av förslaget får reproduceras eller distribueras till någon annan person utan att Handelsbanken dessförinnan lämnat sitt skriftliga medgivande. Handelsbanken ansvarar inte för att materialet används på ett sätt som strider mot förbudet mot vidarebefordran eller offentliggörs i strid med bankens regler.
Analys
Quadruple whammy! Brent crude down $13 in four days

Brent Crude prices continued their decline heading into the weekend. On Friday, the price fell another USD 4 per barrel, followed by a further USD 3 per barrel drop this morning. This means Brent crude oil prices have crashed by a whopping USD 13 per barrel (-21%) since last Wednesday high, marking a significant decline in just four trading days. As of now, Brent crude is trading at USD 62.8 per barrel, its lowest point since February 2021.

The market has faced a ”quadruple whammy”:
#1: U.S. Tariffs: On Wednesday, the U.S. unveiled its new package of individual tariffs. The market reacted swiftly, as Trump followed through on his promise to rebalance the U.S. trade position with the world. His primary objective is a more balanced trade environment, which, naturally, weakened Brent crude prices. The widespread imposition of strict tariffs is likely to fuel concerns about an economic slowdown, which would weaken global oil demand. This macroeconomic uncertainty, especially regarding tariffs, calls for caution about the pace of demand growth.
#2: OPEC+ hike: Shortly after, OPEC+ announced plans to raise production in May by 41,000 bpd, exceeding earlier expectations with a three-monthly increment. OPEC emphasized that strong market fundamentals and a positive outlook were behind the decision. However, the decision likely stemmed from frustration within the cartel, particularly after months of excess production from Kazakhstan and Iraq. Saudi Arabia’s Energy Minister seemed to have reached his limit, emphasizing that the larger-than-expected May output hike would only be a “prelude” if those countries didn’t improve their performance. From Saudi Arabia’s perspective, this signals: ”All comply, or we will drag down the price.”
#3: China’s retaliation: Last Friday, even though the Chinese market was closed, firm indications came from China on how it plans to handle the U.S. tariffs. China is clearly meeting force with force, imposing 34% tariffs on all U.S. goods. This move raises fears of an economic slowdown due to reduced global trade, which would consequently weaken global oil demand going forward.
#4: Saudi price cuts: At the start of this week, oil prices continued to drop after Saudi Arabia slashed its flagship crude price by the most in over two years. Saudi Arabia reduced the Arab Light OSP by USD 2.3 per barrel for Asia in May, while prices to Europe and the U.S. were also cut.
These four key factors have driven the massive price drop over the last four trading days. The overarching theme is the fear of weaker demand and stronger supply. The escalating trade war has raised concerns about a potential global recession, leading to weaker demand, compounded by the surprisingly large output hike from OPEC+.
That said, it’s worth questioning whether the market is underestimating the risk of a U.S.-Iran conflict this year.
U.S. military mobilization and Iran’s resistance to diplomacy have raised the risk of conflict. Efforts to neutralize the Houthis suggest a buildup toward potential strikes on Iran. The recent Liberation Day episode further underscores that economic fallout is not a constraint for Trump, and markets may be underestimating the threat of war in the Middle East.
With this backdrop, we continue to forecast USD 70 per barrel for this year (2025). For reference, Brent crude averaged USD 75 per barrel in Q1-2025.
Analys
Lowest since Dec 2021. Kazakhstan likely reason for OPEC+ surprise hike in May

Collapsing after Trump tariffs and large surprise production hike by OPEC+ in May. Brent crude collapsed yesterday following the shock of the Trump tariffs on April 2 and even more so due to the unexpected announcement from OPEC+ that they will lift production by 411 kb/d in May which is three times as much as expected. Brent fell 6.4% yesterday with a close of USD 70.14/b and traded to a low of USD 69.48/b within the day. This morning it is down another 2.7% to USD 68.2/b. That is below the recent low point in early March of USD 68.33/b. Thus, a new ”lowest since December 2021” today.

Kazakhstan seems to be the problem and the reason for the unexpected large hike by OPEC+ in May. Kazakhstan has consistently breached its production cap. In February it produced 1.83 mb/d crude and 2.12 mb/d including condensates. In March its production reached a new record of 2.17 mb/d. Its crude production cap however is 1.468 mb/d. In February it thus exceeded its production cap by 362 kb/d.
Those who comply are getting frustrated with those who don’t. Internal compliance is an important and difficult issue when OPEC+ is holding back production. The problem naturally grows the bigger the cuts are and the longer they last as impatience grows over time. The cuts have been large, and they have lasted for a long time. And now some cracks are appearing. But that does not mean they cannot be mended. And it does not imply either that the group is totally shifting strategy from Price to Volume. It is still a measured approach. Also, by lifting all caps across the voluntary cutters, Kazakhstan becomes less out of compliance. Thus, less cuts by Kazakhstan are needed in order to become compliant.
While not a shift from Price to Volume, the surprise hike in May is clearly a sign of weakness. The struggle over internal compliance has now led to a rupture in strategy and more production in May than what was previously planned and signaled to the market. It is thus natural to assign a higher production path from the group for 2025 than previously assumed. Do however remember how quickly the price war between Russia and Saudi Arabia ended in the spring of 2020.
Higher production by OPEC+ will be partially countered by lower production from Venezuela and Iran. The new sanctions towards Iran and Venezuela can to a large degree counter the production increase from OPEC+. But to what extent is still unclear.
Buy some oil calls. Bullish risks are never far away. Rising risks for US/Israeli attack on Iran? The US has increased its indirect attacks on Iran by fresh attacks on Syria and Yemen lately. The US has also escalated sanctions towards the country in an effort to force Iran into a new nuclear deal. The UK newspaper TheSun yesterday ran the following story: ”ON THE BRINK US & Iran war is ‘INEVITABLE’, France warns as Trump masses huge strike force with THIRD of America’s stealth bombers”. This is indeed a clear risk which would lead to significant losses of supply of oil in the Middle East and probably not just from Iran. So, buying some oil calls amid the current selloff is probably a prudent thing to do for oil consumers.
Brent crude is rejoining the US equity selloff by its recent collapse though for partially different reasons. New painful tariffs from Trump in combination with more oil from OPEC+ is not a great combination.

Analys
Tariffs deepen economic concerns – significantly weighing on crude oil prices

Brent crude prices initially maintained the gains from late March and traded sideways during the first two trading days in April. Yesterday evening, the price even reached its highest point since mid-February, touching USD 75.5 per barrel.
However, after the U.S. president addressed the public and unveiled his new package of individual tariffs, the market reacted accordingly. Overnight, Brent crude dropped by close to USD 4 per barrel, now trading at USD 71.6 per barrel.
Key takeaways from the speech include a baseline tariff rate of 10% for all countries. Additionally, individual reciprocal tariffs will be imposed on countries with which the U.S. has the largest trade deficits. Many Asian economies end up at the higher end of the scale, with China facing a significant 54% tariff. In contrast, many North and South American countries are at the lower end, with a 10% tariff rate. The EU stands at 20%, which, while not unexpected given earlier signals, is still disappointing, especially after Trump’s previous suggestion that there might be some easing.
Once again, Trump has followed through on his promise, making it clear that he is serious about rebalancing the U.S. trade position with the world. While some negotiation may still occur, the primary objective is to achieve a more balanced trade environment. A weaker U.S. dollar is likely to be an integral part of this solution.
Yet, as the flow of physical goods to the U.S. declines, the natural question arises: where will these goods go? The EU may be forced to raise tariffs on China, mirroring U.S. actions to protect its industries from an influx of discounted Chinese goods.
Initially, we will observe the effects in soft economic data, such as sentiment indices reflecting investor, industry, and consumer confidence, followed by drops in equity markets and, very likely, declining oil prices. This will eventually be followed by more tangible data showing reductions in employment, spending, investments, and overall economic activity.
Ref oil prices moving forward, we have recently adjusted our Brent crude price forecast. The widespread imposition of strict tariffs is expected to foster fears of an economic slowdown, potentially reducing oil demand. Macroeconomic uncertainty, particularly regarding tariffs, warrants caution regarding the pace of demand growth. Our updated forecast of USD 70 per barrel for 2025 and 2026, and USD 75 per barrel for 2027, reflects a more conservative outlook, influenced by stronger-than-expected U.S. supply, a more politically influenced OPEC+, and an increased focus on fragile demand.
___
US DOE data:
Last week, U.S. crude oil refinery inputs averaged 15.6 million barrels per day, a decrease of 192 thousand barrels per day from the previous week. Refineries operated at 86.0% of their total operable capacity during this period. Gasoline production increased slightly, averaging 9.3 million barrels per day, while distillate (diesel) production also rose, averaging 4.7 million barrels per day.
U.S. crude oil imports averaged 6.5 million barrels per day, up by 271 thousand barrels per day from the prior week. Over the past four weeks, imports averaged 5.9 million barrels per day, reflecting a 6.3% year-on-year decline compared to the same period last year.
The focus remains on U.S. crude and product inventories, which continue to impact short-term price dynamics in both WTI and Brent crude. Total commercial petroleum inventories (excl. SPR) increased by 5.4 million barrels, a modest build, yet insufficient to trigger significant price movements.
Commercial crude oil inventories (excl. SPR) rose by 6.2 million barrels, in line with the 6-million-barrel build forecasted by the API. With this latest increase, U.S. crude oil inventories now stand at 439.8 million barrels, which is 4% below the five-year average for this time of year.
Gasoline inventories decreased by 1.6 million barrels, exactly matching the API’s reported decline of 1.6 million barrels. Diesel inventories rose by 0.3 million barrels, which is close to the API’s forecast of an 11-thousand-barrel decrease. Diesel inventories are currently 6% below the five-year average.
Over the past four weeks, total products supplied, a proxy for U.S. demand, averaged 20.1 million barrels per day, a 1.2% decrease compared to the same period last year. Gasoline supplied averaged 8.8 million barrels per day, down 1.9% year-on-year. Diesel supplied averaged 3.8 million barrels per day, marking a 3.7% increase from the same period last year. Jet fuel demand also showed strength, rising 4.2% over the same four-week period.
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Ticking higher as tariff-panic eases. Demand growth and OPEC+ will be key
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Crude prices hold gains amid fresh tariff threats
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Oil prices climb, but fundamentals will keep rallies in check
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Ett samtal om råvarorna som behövs för batterier
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Tysklands SEFE skriver avtal om att köpa 1,5 miljarder ton LNG per år från Delfin i USA
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
700 timmar med negativa elpriser och dyrare biobränsle gav lägre resultat för Jämtkraft
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Priset på koppar skiljer sig åt efter tariffer
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Danska Seaborg Technologies siktar på serieproduktion av smältsaltsreaktorer till mitten av 2030-talet