Analys
OPEC and non-OPEC tighten their belts
Focusing on details was never likely at the spring OPEC meeting in Vienna. The group decided to extend the current cut by nine months. Instead of concentrating on specifics, the meeting and press conference seemed to be arranged to create the impression of a strong alliance between the world’s two largest crude oil producers, Saudi Arabia and Russia.
One man show: Al Falih
After one year in office and clearly the architect of the existing cutback strategy, Saudi Arabia’s oil minister, Al Falih, is now the protagonist at the OPEC Secretariat. Al Falih is working closely with his Russian counterpart, Novak. They raised market expectations ahead of the meeting through a joint press conference in China. After opening up for a ninemonth extension, other countries had little to do but follow. We believe Al Falih and Novak synchronised information leaks to the media. In addition, they arranged a joint session between OPEC and non- OPEC countries at the official OPEC meeting. To further spread the word of the new alliance, the world’s two mightiest oil men dined together in Vienna the day before the meeting. Naturally, they gave a short speech when ‘spotted’ by the media.
Mountain out of a molehill
“Too much talk, too little cutting production” is the reaction after the first round agreement on cutbacks. OPEC has failed to clear the market glut. However, we believe the curbs and conversations are working toward bulging the coffers of oil producing nations.
The size of the cut is only a fraction of the well planned/timed cutbacks of the Asian crisis in 1998, the dot com recession in 2001, and the global financial crisis in 2008. This time, weak oil prices stem from growing supply, rather than weaker demand, leaving the cartel toothless. If OPEC genuinely wants to drive oil prices, we believe it needs to make a deeper cut. At this stage, it appears it is not prepared to bare the cost.
In our view, shale oil is growing too fast and any OPEC change must be well balanced to further avoid accelerating growth in US crude oil production.
Same conditions
Iran, Nigeria and Libya are subject to the same exemption conditions as in the original accord. We believe Libya’s potential recovery is a possible risk, and could undermine cuts from the producer group. Libya and the US have so far erased the lion’s share of OPEC cuts in the first part of the accord.
Weak outlook
In our view, a rollover without a promise of further extension does not correspond to the “whatever it takes” assertion from Al-Falih. If the deal unravels, we believe the cut of more than 1.2 million bbl/d will flood back into market, causing prices to crash, again. The nine-month extension should help to bring about a modest deficit in the oil market, supporting a floor prices. We estimate USD 50 as a reasonable price during that time. However, ultimately, we believe the market will start to test OPEC’s endurance. In our view, prices will start drifting toward USD 40 once more, if the stock overhang persists.
Research disclaimer
Risk warning
All investments involve risks and investors are encouraged to make their own decision as to the appropriateness of an investment in any securities referred to in this report, based on their specific investment objectives, financial status and risk tolerance. The historical return of a financial instrument is not a guarantee of future return. The value of financial instruments can rise or fall, and it is not certain that you will get back all the capital you have invested.
Research disclaimers
Handelsbanken Capital Markets, a division of Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ) (collectively referred to herein as ‘SHB’), is responsible for the preparation of research reports. SHB is regulated in Sweden by the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority, in Norway by the Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway, in Finland by the Financial Supervisory Authority and in Denmark by the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority. All research reports are prepared from trade and statistical services and other information that SHB considers to be reliable. SHB has not independently verified such information and does not represent that such information is true, accurate or complete. Accordingly, to the extent permitted by law, neither SHB, nor any of its directors, officers or employees, nor any other person, accept any liability whatsoever for any loss, however it arises, from any use of such research reports or its contents or otherwise arising in connection therewith.
In no event will SHB or any of its affiliates, their officers, directors or employees be liable to any person for any direct, indirect, special or consequential damages arising out of any use of the information contained in the research reports, including without limitation any lost profits even if SHB is expressly advised of the possibility or likelihood of such damages.
The views contained in SHB research reports are the opinions of employees of SHB and its affiliates and accurately reflect the personal views of the respective analysts at this date and are subject to change. There can be no assurance that future events will be consistent with any such opinions. Each analyst identified in this research report also certifies that the opinions expressed herein and attributed to such analyst accurately reflect his or her individual views about the companies or securities discussed in the research report.
Research reports are prepared by SHB for information purposes only. The information in the research reports does not constitute a personal recommendation or personalised investment advice and such reports or opinions should not be the basis for making investment or strategic decisions. This document does not constitute or form part of any offer for sale or subscription of or solicitation of any offer to buy or subscribe for any securities nor shall it or any part of it form the basis of or be relied on in connection with any contract or commitment whatsoever. Past performance may not be repeated and should not be seen as an indication of future performance. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may forfeit all principal originally invested. Investors are not guaranteed to make profits on investments and may lose money. Exchange rates may cause the value of overseas investments and the income arising from them to rise or fall. This research product will be updated on a regular basis.
No part of SHB research reports may be reproduced or distributed to any other person without the prior written consent of SHB. The distribution of this document in certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law and persons into whose possession this document comes should inform themselves about, and observe, any such restrictions.
The report does not cover any legal or tax-related aspects pertaining to any of the issuer’s planned or existing debt issuances.
Analys
Crude oil comment: Mixed U.S. data skews bearish – prices respond accordingly
Since market opening yesterday, Brent crude prices have returned close to the same level as 24 hours ago. However, before the release of the weekly U.S. petroleum status report at 17:00 CEST yesterday, we observed a brief spike, with prices reaching USD 73.2 per barrel. This morning, Brent is trading at USD 71.4 per barrel as the market searches for any bullish fundamentals amid ongoing concerns about demand growth and the potential for increased OPEC+ production in 2025, for which there currently appears to be limited capacity – a fact that OPEC+ is fully aware of, raising doubts about any such action.
It is also notable that the USD strengthened yesterday but retreated slightly this morning.
U.S. commercial crude oil inventories increased by 2.1 million barrels to 429.7 million barrels. Although this build brings inventories to about 4% below the five-year seasonal average, it contrasts with the earlier U.S. API data, which had indicated a decline of 0.8 million barrels. This discrepancy has added some downward pressure on prices.
On the other hand, gasoline inventories fell sharply by 4.4 million barrels, and distillate (diesel) inventories dropped by 1.4 million barrels, both now sitting around 4-5% below the five-year average. Total commercial petroleum inventories also saw a significant decline of 6.5 million barrels, helping to maintain some balance in the market.
Refinery inputs averaged 16.5 million barrels per day, an increase of 175,000 barrels per day from the previous week, with refineries operating at 91.4% capacity. Crude imports rose to 6.5 million barrels per day, an increase of 269,000 barrels per day.
Over the past four weeks, total products supplied averaged 20.8 million barrels per day, up 1.8% from the same period last year. Gasoline demand increased by 0.6%, while distillate (diesel) and jet fuel demand declined significantly by 4.0% and 4.6%, respectively, compared to the same period a year ago.
Overall, the report presents mixed signals but leans slightly bearish due to the increase in crude inventories and notably weaker demand for diesel and jet fuel. These factors somewhat overshadow the bullish aspects, such as the decline in gasoline inventories and higher refinery utilization.
Analys
Crude oil comment: Fundamentals back in focus, with OPEC+ strategy crucial for price direction
Since the market close on Monday, November 11, Brent crude prices have stabilized around USD 72 per barrel, after briefly dipping to a monthly low of USD 70.7 per barrel yesterday afternoon. The momentum has been mixed, oscillating between bearish and cautious optimism. This morning, Brent is trading at USD 71.9 per barrel as the market adopts a “wait and see” stance. The continued strength of the US dollar is exerting downward pressure on commodities overall, while ongoing concerns about demand growth are weighing on the outlook for crude.
As we noted in Tuesday’s crude oil comment, there has been an unusual silence from Iran, leading to a significant reduction in the geopolitical risk premium. According to the Washington Post, Israel has initiated cease-fire negotiations with Lebanon, influenced by the shifting political landscape following Trump’s potential return to the White House. As a result, the market is currently pricing in a reduced risk of further major escalations in the Middle East. However, while the geopolitical risk premium of around USD 4-5 per barrel remains in the background, it has been temporarily sidelined but could quickly resurface if tensions escalate.
The EIA reports that India has now become the primary source of oil demand growth in Asia, as China’s consumption weakens due to its economic slowdown and rising electric vehicle sales. This highlights growing concerns over China’s diminishing role in the global oil market.
From a fundamental perspective, we expect Brent crude to remain well above USD 70 per barrel in the near term, but the outlook hinges largely on the upcoming OPEC+ meeting in early December. So far, the cartel, led by Saudi Arabia and Russia, has twice postponed its plans to increase production this year. This decision was made in response to weakening demand from China and increasing US oil supplies, which have dampened market sentiment. The cartel now plans to implement the first in a series of monthly hikes starting in January 2025, after originally planning them for October. Given the current supply dynamics, there appears to be limited room for additional OPEC volumes at this time, and the situation will likely be reassessed at their December 1st meeting.
The latest report from the US API showed a decline in US crude inventories of 0.8 million barrels last week, with stockpiles at the Cushing, Oklahoma hub falling by a substantial 1.9 million barrels. The “official” figures from the US DOE are expected to be released today at 16:30 CEST.
In conclusion, over the past month, global crude oil prices have fluctuated between gains and losses as market participants weigh US monetary policy (particularly in light of the election), concerns over Chinese demand, and the evolving supply strategy of OPEC+. The coming weeks will be critical in shaping the near-term outlook for the oil market.
Analys
Crude oil comment: Iran’s silence hints at a new geopolitical reality
Since the market opened on Monday, November 11, Brent crude prices have declined sharply, dropping nearly USD 2.2 per barrel in just over a day. The positive momentum seen in late October and early November has largely dissipated, with Brent now trading at USD 71.9 per barrel.
Several factors have contributed to the recent price decline. Most notably, the continued strengthening of the U.S. dollar remains a key driver, as it gained further overnight. Meanwhile, U.S. government bond yields showed mixed movements: the 2-year yield rose, while the 10-year yield edged slightly lower, indicating larger uncertainty.
Adding to the downward pressure is ongoing concern over weak Chinese crude demand. The market reacted negatively to the absence of a consumer-focused stimulus package, which has led to persistent pricing in of subdued demand from China – the world’s largest crude importer and second-largest crude consumer. However, we anticipate that China recognizes the significance of the situation, and a substantial stimulus package is imminent once the country emerges from its current balance sheet recession: where businesses and households are currently prioritizing debt reduction over spending and investment, limiting immediate economic recovery.
Lastly, the geopolitical risk premium appears to be fading due to the current silence from Iran. As we have highlighted previously, when a “scheduled” retaliatory strike does not materialize quickly, it reduces any built-in price premium. With no visible retaliation from Iran yesterday, and likely none today or tomorrow, the market is pricing in diminished geopolitical risk. Furthermore, the outcome of the U.S. with a Trump victory may have altered the dynamics of the conflict entirely. It is plausible that Iran will proceed cautiously, anticipating a harsh response (read sanctions) from the U.S. should tensions escalate further.
Looking ahead, the market will be closely monitoring key reports this week: the EIA’s Weekly Petroleum Status Report on Wednesday and the IEA’s Oil Market Report on Thursday.
In summary, we believe that while the demand outlook will eventually stabilize, the strong oil supply continues to act as a suppressing force on prices. Given the current supply environment, there appears to be little room for additional OPEC volumes at this time, a situation the cartel will likely assess continuously on a monthly basis going forward.
With this context, we maintain moderately bullish for next year and continue to see an average Brent price of USD 75 per barrel.
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Market battling between spike-risk versus 2025 surplus
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Uniper har säkrat 175 MW elektricitet i Östersund för e-metanol
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Guldpriset passerar 2700 USD till sin högsta nivå någonsin
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
District Metals prospekterar uran i Sverige, nu noteras även aktierna här
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: It takes guts to hold short positions
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Guldpriset stiger hela tiden till nya rekord
-
Analys2 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: A price rise driven by fundamentals
-
Analys2 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Recent ’geopolitical relief’ seems premature