Analys
OPEC and non-OPEC tighten their belts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42a13/42a138eb792b8f725382e17b1074f82e249244b0" alt="Handelsbanken - Råvarubrevet - Nyhetsbrev om råvaror"
Focusing on details was never likely at the spring OPEC meeting in Vienna. The group decided to extend the current cut by nine months. Instead of concentrating on specifics, the meeting and press conference seemed to be arranged to create the impression of a strong alliance between the world’s two largest crude oil producers, Saudi Arabia and Russia.
One man show: Al Falih
After one year in office and clearly the architect of the existing cutback strategy, Saudi Arabia’s oil minister, Al Falih, is now the protagonist at the OPEC Secretariat. Al Falih is working closely with his Russian counterpart, Novak. They raised market expectations ahead of the meeting through a joint press conference in China. After opening up for a ninemonth extension, other countries had little to do but follow. We believe Al Falih and Novak synchronised information leaks to the media. In addition, they arranged a joint session between OPEC and non- OPEC countries at the official OPEC meeting. To further spread the word of the new alliance, the world’s two mightiest oil men dined together in Vienna the day before the meeting. Naturally, they gave a short speech when ‘spotted’ by the media.
Mountain out of a molehill
“Too much talk, too little cutting production” is the reaction after the first round agreement on cutbacks. OPEC has failed to clear the market glut. However, we believe the curbs and conversations are working toward bulging the coffers of oil producing nations.
The size of the cut is only a fraction of the well planned/timed cutbacks of the Asian crisis in 1998, the dot com recession in 2001, and the global financial crisis in 2008. This time, weak oil prices stem from growing supply, rather than weaker demand, leaving the cartel toothless. If OPEC genuinely wants to drive oil prices, we believe it needs to make a deeper cut. At this stage, it appears it is not prepared to bare the cost.
In our view, shale oil is growing too fast and any OPEC change must be well balanced to further avoid accelerating growth in US crude oil production.
Same conditions
Iran, Nigeria and Libya are subject to the same exemption conditions as in the original accord. We believe Libya’s potential recovery is a possible risk, and could undermine cuts from the producer group. Libya and the US have so far erased the lion’s share of OPEC cuts in the first part of the accord.
Weak outlook
In our view, a rollover without a promise of further extension does not correspond to the “whatever it takes” assertion from Al-Falih. If the deal unravels, we believe the cut of more than 1.2 million bbl/d will flood back into market, causing prices to crash, again. The nine-month extension should help to bring about a modest deficit in the oil market, supporting a floor prices. We estimate USD 50 as a reasonable price during that time. However, ultimately, we believe the market will start to test OPEC’s endurance. In our view, prices will start drifting toward USD 40 once more, if the stock overhang persists.
Research disclaimer
Risk warning
All investments involve risks and investors are encouraged to make their own decision as to the appropriateness of an investment in any securities referred to in this report, based on their specific investment objectives, financial status and risk tolerance. The historical return of a financial instrument is not a guarantee of future return. The value of financial instruments can rise or fall, and it is not certain that you will get back all the capital you have invested.
Research disclaimers
Handelsbanken Capital Markets, a division of Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ) (collectively referred to herein as ‘SHB’), is responsible for the preparation of research reports. SHB is regulated in Sweden by the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority, in Norway by the Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway, in Finland by the Financial Supervisory Authority and in Denmark by the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority. All research reports are prepared from trade and statistical services and other information that SHB considers to be reliable. SHB has not independently verified such information and does not represent that such information is true, accurate or complete. Accordingly, to the extent permitted by law, neither SHB, nor any of its directors, officers or employees, nor any other person, accept any liability whatsoever for any loss, however it arises, from any use of such research reports or its contents or otherwise arising in connection therewith.
In no event will SHB or any of its affiliates, their officers, directors or employees be liable to any person for any direct, indirect, special or consequential damages arising out of any use of the information contained in the research reports, including without limitation any lost profits even if SHB is expressly advised of the possibility or likelihood of such damages.
The views contained in SHB research reports are the opinions of employees of SHB and its affiliates and accurately reflect the personal views of the respective analysts at this date and are subject to change. There can be no assurance that future events will be consistent with any such opinions. Each analyst identified in this research report also certifies that the opinions expressed herein and attributed to such analyst accurately reflect his or her individual views about the companies or securities discussed in the research report.
Research reports are prepared by SHB for information purposes only. The information in the research reports does not constitute a personal recommendation or personalised investment advice and such reports or opinions should not be the basis for making investment or strategic decisions. This document does not constitute or form part of any offer for sale or subscription of or solicitation of any offer to buy or subscribe for any securities nor shall it or any part of it form the basis of or be relied on in connection with any contract or commitment whatsoever. Past performance may not be repeated and should not be seen as an indication of future performance. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may forfeit all principal originally invested. Investors are not guaranteed to make profits on investments and may lose money. Exchange rates may cause the value of overseas investments and the income arising from them to rise or fall. This research product will be updated on a regular basis.
No part of SHB research reports may be reproduced or distributed to any other person without the prior written consent of SHB. The distribution of this document in certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law and persons into whose possession this document comes should inform themselves about, and observe, any such restrictions.
The report does not cover any legal or tax-related aspects pertaining to any of the issuer’s planned or existing debt issuances.
Analys
Stronger inventory build than consensus, diesel demand notable
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdf51/fdf51d67b2ed538e3c73d6a9a29862e948ef5457" alt="SEB - analysbrev på råvaror"
Yesterday’s US DOE report revealed an increase of 4.6 million barrels in US crude oil inventories for the week ending February 14. This build was slightly higher than the API’s forecast of +3.3 million barrels and compared with a consensus estimate of +3.5 million barrels. As of this week, total US crude inventories stand at 432.5 million barrels – ish 3% below the five-year average for this time of year.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c68bd/c68bd78bd0caa5fa0f53630da6c1ce1a0f045535" alt="Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB"
In addition, gasoline inventories saw a slight decrease of 0.2 million barrels, now about 1% below the five-year average. Diesel inventories decreased by 2.1 million barrels, marking a 12% drop from the five-year average for this period.
Refinery utilization averaged 84.9% of operable capacity, a slight decrease from the previous week. Refinery inputs averaged 15.4 million barrels per day, down by 15 thousand barrels per day from the prior week. Gasoline production decreased to an average of 9.2 million barrels per day, while diesel production increased to 4.7 million barrels per day.
Total products supplied (implied demand) over the last four-week period averaged 20.4 million barrels per day, reflecting a 3.7% increase compared to the same period in 2024. Specifically, motor gasoline demand averaged 8.4 million barrels per day, up by 0.4% year-on-year, and diesel demand averaged 4.3 million barrels per day, showing a strong 14.2% increase compared to last year. Jet fuel demand also rose by 4.3% compared to the same period in 2024.
Analys
Higher on confidence OPEC+ won’t lift production. Taking little notice of Trump sledgehammer to global free trade
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdf51/fdf51d67b2ed538e3c73d6a9a29862e948ef5457" alt="SEB - analysbrev på råvaror"
Ticking higher on confidence that OPEC+ won’t lift production in April. Brent crude gained 0.8% yesterday with a close of USD 75.84/b. This morning it is gaining another 0.7% to USD 76.3/b. Signals the latest days that OPEC+ is considering a delay to its planned production increase in April and the following months is probably the most important reason. But we would be surprised if that wasn’t fully anticipated and discounted in the oil price already. News this morning that there are ”green shots” to be seen in the Chinese property market is macro-positive, but industrial metals are not moving. It is naturally to be concerned about the global economic outlook as Donald Trump takes a sledgehammer smashing away at the existing global ”free-trade structure” with signals of 25% tariffs on car imports to the US. The oil price takes little notice of this today though.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9ff5/b9ff59a962c4e8b24310d176e8e3f659a8a6b368" alt="Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB"
Kazakhstan CPC crude flows possibly down 30% for months due to damaged CPC pumping station. The Brent price has been in steady decline since mid-January but seems to have found some support around the USD 74/b mark, the low point from Thursday last week. Technically it is inching above the 50dma today with 200dma above at USD 77.64/b. Oil flowing from Kazakhstan on the CPC line may be reduced by 30% until the Krapotkinskaya oil pumping station is repaired. That may take several months says Russia’s Novak. This probably helps to add support to Brent crude today.
The Brent crude 1mth contract with 50dma, 100dma, 200dma and RSI. Nothing on the horizon at the moment which makes us expect any imminent break above USD 80/b
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f2a2/2f2a25cb39d682ad23a1ea233432c53d66ec0866" alt="The Brent crude 1mth contract with 50dma, 100dma, 200dma and RSI. Nothing on the horizon at the moment which makes us expect any imminent break above USD 80/b"
Analys
Brent looks to US production costs. Taking little notice of Trump-tariffs and Ukraine peace-dealing
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdf51/fdf51d67b2ed538e3c73d6a9a29862e948ef5457" alt="SEB - analysbrev på råvaror"
Brent crude hardly moved last week taking little notice of neither tariffs nor Ukraine peace-dealing. Brent crude traded up 0.1% last week to USD 74.74/b trading in a range of USD 74.06 – 77.29/b. Fluctuations through the week may have been driven by varying signals from the Putin-Trump peace negotiations over Ukraine. This morning Brent is up 0.4% to USD 75/b. Gain is possibly due to news that a Caspian pipeline pumping station has been hit by a drone with reduced CPC (Kazaksthan) oil flows as a result.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9ff5/b9ff59a962c4e8b24310d176e8e3f659a8a6b368" alt="Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB"
Brent front-month contract rock solid around the USD 75/b mark. The Brent crude price level of around USD 75/b hardly moved an inch week on week. Fear that Trump-tariffs will hurt global economic growth and oil demand growth. No impact. Possibility that a peace deal over Ukraine will lead to increased exports of oil from Russia. No impact. On the latter. Russian oil production at 9 mb/band versus a more normal 10 mb/d and comparably lower exports is NOT due to sanctions by the EU and the US. Russia is part of OPEC+, and its production is aligned with Saudi Arabia at 9 mb/d and the agreement Russia has made with Saudi Arabia and OPEC+ under the Declaration of Cooperation (DoC). Though exports of Russian crude and products has been hampered a little by the new Biden-sanctions on 10 January, but that effect is probably fading by the day as oil flows have a tendency to seep through the sanction barriers over time. A sharp decline in time-spreads is probably a sign of that.
Longer-dated prices zoom in on US cost break-evens with 5yr WTI at USD 63/b and Brent at USD 68-b. Argus reported on Friday that a Kansas City Fed survey last month indicated an average of USD 62/b for average drilling and oil production in the US to be profitable. That is down from USD 64/b last year. In comparison the 5-year (60mth) WTI contract is trading at USD 62.8/b. Right at that level. The survey response also stated that an oil price of sub-USD 70/b won’t be enough over time for the US oil industry to make sufficient profits with decline capex over time with sub-USD 70/b prices. But for now, the WTI 5yr is trading at USD 62.8/b and the Brent crude 5-yr is trading at USD 67.7/b.
Volatility comes in waves. Brent crude 30dma annualized volatility.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1362/e13627d21e366e7a4dcb020090ecb11af60e5e0a" alt="Volatility comes in waves. Brent crude 30dma annualized volatility."
1 to 3 months’ time-spreads have fallen back sharply. Crude oil from Russia and Iran may be seeping through the 10 Jan Biden-sanctions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45211/45211dfbec8c39a16a6aea6cd6118ac3ba068388" alt="1 to 3 months' time-spreads have fallen back sharply. Crude oil from Russia and Iran may be seeping through the 10 Jan Biden-sanctions."
Brent crude 1M, 12M, 24M and Y2027 prices.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a2e1/1a2e1b7eea2d7e119a1f62ff1ea6c5cd73879713" alt="Brent crude 1M, 12M, 24M and Y2027 prices."
ARA Jet 1M, 12M, 24M and Y2027 prices.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77d87/77d8789a983b8abdb92d69e0a2a20eebb0880c9c" alt="ARA Jet 1M, 12M, 24M and Y2027 prices."
ICE Gasoil 1M, 12M, 24M and Y2027 prices.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8f14/b8f14f8aeb0b5b56b021503caa208da412e1c0c5" alt="ICE Gasoil 1M, 12M, 24M and Y2027 prices."
Rotterdam Fuel oil 0.5% 1M, 12M, 24M and Y2027 prices.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22e64/22e64b029c66c7407a09f001aae6cb52de383fb2" alt="Rotterdam Fuel oil 0.5% 1M, 12M, 24M and Y2027 prices."
Rotterdam Fuel oil 3.5% 1M, 12M, 24M and Y2027 prices.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af1ef/af1efeccbae2553b0f92730d6490d53c351651c1" alt="Rotterdam Fuel oil 3.5% 1M, 12M, 24M and Y2027 prices."
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Belgien gör en u-sväng, går från att lägga ner kärnkraft till att bygga ny
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Fondförvaltare köper aktier i kanadensiska guldproducenter när valutan faller
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Brent rebound is likely as Biden-sanctions are creating painful tightness
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Prisskillnaden mellan råoljorna WCS och WTI vidgas med USA:s tariffkrig
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Priset på arabica-kaffebönor är nu över 4 USD per pund för första gången någonsin
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
På lördag inför USA tariff på 25 procent för import från Kanada, olja kan dock undantas
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Virke, råvaran som är Kanadas trumfkort mot USA
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
The Damocles Sword of OPEC+ hanging over US shale oil producers