Analys
LME Week 2014 på tre minuter
LME veckan är dagarna då industrin för basmetaller samlas i London och försöker bilda sig en uppfattning om var priserna på metallerna ska ta vägen nästa år. Upptakten till årets konferens var allt annat än positivt när basmetallerna kommit ner i pris och investmentbankerna sänkt utsikterna inför nästa år. Hemma efter årets LME-vecka sammanfattar vi diskussioner, teman och frågor.
Förväntningar
Inför årets tillställning reste vi till London med förväntansbilden av att Indonesiens exportförbud skulle föra nickel till årets snackis, tätt följt av de fysiska premierna för aluminium och LME:s aktion att införa en börshandlad fysisk premie efter att ha misslyckats lösa situationen med de långa köerna för att få ut aluminium ur LME-lagerhusen. I vår förväntansbild fanns inte det generellt negativa sentimentet kring makroutsikterna och metallmarknaderna inför 2015. Att Kina bromsar in har vi haft i korten i flera år och borde inte vara en överraskning för någon i branschen.
LME-seminariet
LME:s Vd, Gary Jones adresserade problemet med köer till lagerhusen redan i öppningsanförandet. Stora ord krävdes för att klä arbetet med att ta bort köerna men de maskerade inte LME:s misslyckande och kvittot kom när LME lanserade ett kontrakt för den fysiska premien. På så vis kan metallhandlare handla risken för att köerna och därmed premierna ska gå upp eller ner. En häpnadsväckande raffinerad lösning på ett problem med att få ut metalltackor ur ett plåthus med en gaffeltruck.
Generella teman
- Utbudet är viktigare än efterfrågan för priserna 2015
- Ökad nationalisering av naturtillgångar (Indonesien, nickel)
- Metallerna divergerar med allt mer åtskiljd fundamenta
- Lägre energipriser sänker metallprisgolvet genom lägre produktionskostnad
- Kinas husmarknad största orosmolnet på makrosidan
- Ökad volatilitet efter lanseringen av minikontrakt för retailmarknaden i Kina via LME:s kommande Hong Kong-kontrakt
- Lagerstatistik har blivit svårtolkad då stora lager finns utanför LME-husen
- Konsensus förväntan på när underskott ska uppstå per metall:
LME Week metall för metall
Nedan sammanfattar vi intrycken från diskussionerna per metall. Av de tre, zink, aluminium och koppar, som avhandlades på det officiella LME-seminariet trodde åhörarna att risken för prisuppgång var störst för Zn 43 % följt av Al 42% och sist koppar med 15%.
Koppar
Alla metaller pressas av ökat utbud utom koppar som pressas av förväntan om ökat utbud. Utbudstoppen har flyttats från 2014 till 2015 efter flera förseningar bland de stora projekten och Grasbergs minskade export under 2014 under Indonesiens exportförbud. Riskerna för utbudstoppen nästa år är mycket mindre då 30% av den kommer från normalisering i produktionen i vissa stora gruvor (bland annat Grasberg), 35% infasning av nya gruvor som börjat producera (de är förbi det mest kritiska stadiet) och 35% från nya greenfield- eller brownfieldprojekt. Kinas årliga tillväxt i kopparimport väntas falla till den lägsta på 6 år och kombinationen gör att priserna väntas ner under 2015 men sedan åter upp 2016 då pipelinen för kopparprojekt är tunn längre fram. Viktigaste produktionsfaktorerna under 2015 är Sierra Goroda, Sisha, Oyu Tolgoi, Caserones, Toromocho och Mine minestro Hales. Vi håller kvar vårt scenario med en koppardipp till 5500 USD/ton 2015 men där medelpriset blir mellan 5750 USD/ton.
Aluminium
Första halvan av 2014 dominerades av uppskruvade förväntningar på efterfrågan från Amerikansk bilindustri. I kombination med mycket trendföljande spekulation steg priset snabbt. Utsikterna för aluminium i bilindustrin har sedan dess delvis grusats när nästa generations bilar verkar gå från aluminium till höghållfasta supertunna stål. Indonesiens exportförbud har inte drivit upp priset på råvaran bauxit och avställd smältverkskapacitet finns hela tiden i bilden, redo att kliva in och dämpa långsiktiga prisrallyn. Det finns ingen brist på aluminium globalt men en del vittnar om brist i statistiken med oväntade poster på 850 Kt i Mexico ämnad för amerikanska marknaden. Kina och resten av världen är delvis separerade men om ex Kina går i underskott kommer Kinas export av halvfabrikat täcka upp. Vi behåller vårt scenario för 2015 med aluminium mellan 1800-2000 och 1900 USD/ton i medelpris.
Zink
Annalkande gruvstängningar börjar etablera sig som tema och zink är nu nästa nickel i mångas sinne. Tesen fick dock visst motstånd där man menar att det visserligen ska stängas några få riktigt stora gruvor men det finns å andra sidan ett stort antal små gruvor som kommer expandera med strategin att ta marknadsandelar i bakvattnet av de utbrutna. Svårt att bedöma sannolikheten med många små expansioner men vi står kvar i relativt positiv syn på zink med 2250 USD/ton som medelpris 2015
Nickel
Tveklöst den metall där deltagarna har störst tro på högre priser inför 2015. Underliggande fundamenta har förvärrats under året och kunskapen kring Filipinernas säsongsmönster i exporten som har täckt upp för Indonesiens exportförbud så här lång börjar sprida sig. Filipinerna går nu in i monsunperioden då regnfall minskar möjligheterna att exportera malm radikalt. Deltagarna räknar med att nickelmarknaden hamnar i underskott nästa år och att lagernivåer kommer konsumeras för att balansera marknaden. Högre prisestimat är ett tema och vårt scenario med snittpris på 23 000 USD/ton är visserligen en stor rörelse men finner relativt god acceptans. Nickel är i våra ögon den enda basmetall som har risk för prisuppgång på mer än 50 % under 2015 från dagens nivåer.
Analys
Oil product price pain is set to rise as the Strait of Hormuz stays closed into summer
Market is starting to take US/Iran headlines with a pinch of salt. Brent crude rose $2.8/b yesterday to an official close of $112.1/b. But after that it traded as low as $108.05/b before ending late night at around $109.7/b. Through the day it traded in a range of $106.87 – 112.72/b amid a flurry of news or rumors from Iran and the US. ”US temporary sanctions during negotiations” (falls alarm). ”We will bomb Iran” (not anyhow),… etc. While the market is still fluctuating to this kind of news flow, it is starting to take such headlines with a pinch of salt.

We’ll see. Maybe, maybe not. The Brent M1 contract is trading at $110.2/b this morning which very close to the average ticks through yesterday of $110.4/b.
Trump with bearish, verbal intervention whenever Brent trades above $110/b it seems. What seems to be a pattern is that Trump states something like ”very good negotiations going on with Iran”, ”New leaders in Iran are great,..”, ”Great progress in negotiations,…”, ”Deal in sight,..” etc whenever the Brent M1 contract trades above $110/b. An effort to cool the market. These hot air verbal interventions from Trump used to have a heavy bearish impact on prices, but they now seems to have less and less effect unless they are backed by reality.
As far as we can see there has been no real progress in the negotiations between the US and Iran with both sides still standing by their previous demands.
Iran is getting stronger while the cease fire lasts making a return to war for Trump yet harder. Iran is naturally in constant preparation for a return to war given Trump’s steady threats of bombing Iran again. Iran is naturally doing what ever is possible to prepare for a return to war. And every day the cease fire lasts it is better prepared. This naturally makes it more and more difficult and dangerous for the US to return to warring activity versus Iran as the consequences for energy infrastructure in the Persian Gulf will be more and more severe the longer the cease fire lasts. Israel seems to see it this way as well. That the war is not won and that current frozen state of a cease fire gives Iran opportunity to rebuild military and politically.
Global inventories are drawing down day by day. How much? In the meantime the Strait of Hormuz stays closed. There is varying measures and estimates of how much global inventories are drawing down. Our rough estimate, back of the envelope, is that global inventories are drawing down by at least some 10 mb/d or about 300 mb/d in a balance between loss of supply versus demand destruction. Other estimates we see are a monthly draw of 250-270 mb/d. The IEA only ’measured’ a draw in global observable stocks of 117 mb in April with oil on water rising 53 mb while on shore stocks fell 170 mb. But global stocks are hard to measure with large invisible, unmeasured stocks. As such a back of the envelope approach may be better.
Oil products is what the world is consuming. Oil product prices likely to rise while product stocks fall. Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR) are predominantly crude oil. Discharging oil from OECD SPR stocks, a sharp reduction in Chinese crude imports and a reduction in global refinery throughput of 6-7 mb/d has helped to keep crude oil markets satisfactorily supplied. But global inventories are drawing down none the less. And oil products is really what the world is consuming. So if global refinery throughput stays subdued, then demand will eventually have to match the supply of oil products. The likely path forward this summer is a steady draw down in jet fuel, diesel and gasoline. Higher prices for these. Then, if possible, higher refinery throughput and higher usage of crude in response to very profitable refinery margins. And lastly sharper draw in crude stocks and higher prices for these. But some 6 mb/d of oil products used to be exported through the Strait of Hormuz. And it may not be so easy to ramp up refinery activity across the world to compensate. Especially as Ukraine continues to damage Russian refineries as well as Russian crude production and export facilities.
Watch oil product stocks and prices as well as Brent calendar 2027. What to watch for this summer is thus oil product inventories falling and oil product premiums to crude rising. Another measure to watch is the Brent crude 2027 contract as it rises steadily day by day as the Strait of Hormuz stays closed and global oil inventories decline. The latter is close to the highest level since the start of the war and keeps rising.
The Brent M1 contract and the Brent 2027 prices and current price of jet fuel in Europe (ARA). All in USD/b

Our back of the envelope calculation of the global shortage created by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Note that 3.5 mb/d of discharge from SPR is also a draw. Note also that ’Forced demand loss’ of 2.5 mb/d is probably temporary and will fall back towards zero as logistics are sorted out leaving ’Price demand loss’ to do the job of balancing the market. Thus a shortfall of at least 9 mb/d created by the closure. More if SPR discharge is included and more if Forced demand loss recedes.

Analys
Brent crude up USD 9/bl on the week… ”deal around the corner” narrative fades
Brent is climbing higher. Front-month is at USD 106.3/bl this morning, close to a weekly high and a USD 9/bl jump from Mondays open. This is the move we flagged as a risk earlier in the week: the market shifting from ”a deal is around the corner” to ”this is going to take longer than we thought”.

Analyst Commodities, SEB
During April, rest-of-year Brent remained remarkably stable around USD 90/bl. A stability which rested on one single assumption: the SoH reopens around 1 May. That assumption is now slowly falling apart.
As we highlighted yesterday: every week of delay beyond 1 May adds (theoretically) ish USD 5/bl to the rest-of-year average, as global inventories draw 100 million barrels per week. i.e., a mid-May reopening implies rest-of-year Brent closer to USD 100/bl, and anything pushing into June or July takes us meaningfully higher.
What’s changed in the last 48 hours:
#1: The US military has formally warned that clearing suspected sea mines from SoH could take up to six months. That is a completely different timescale from what the financial market is pricing. Even a political deal tomorrow does not immediately reopen the strait.
#2: Trump has shifted his tone from urgency to ”strategic patience”. In yesterday’s press conference: ”Don’t rush me… I want a great deal.” The market is reading this as a president no longer feeling pressured by timelines, with the naval blockade running in the background.
#3: So far, the military activity is escalating, not de-escalating. Axios reports Iran is laying more mines in SoH. The US 3rd carrier strike group (USS George H.W. Bush) is arriving with two countermine vessels. Trump yesterday ordered the US Navy to destroy any Iranian boats caught laying mines. While CNN reports that the Pentagon is actively drawing up plans to strike Iranian SoH capabilities and individual Iranian military leaders if the ceasefire collapses. i.e., NOT a attitude consistent with an imminent deal!
Spot crude and product prices eased off the early-April highs on a combination of system rerouting and deal optimism. Both now weakening. Goldman estimates April Gulf output is reduced by 14.5 mbl/d, or 57% of pre-war supply, a number that keeps getting worse the longer this drags on.
Demand-side adaptation is ongoing: S. Korea has cut its Middle East crude dependence from 69% to 56% by pulling more from the Americas and Africa, and Japan is kicking off a second round of SPR releases from 1 May. But SPRs are finite.
Ref. to the negotiations, we should not bet on speed. The current Iranian leadership is dominated by genuine hardliners willing to absorb economic pain and run the clock to extract concessions. That is not a setup for a rapid resolution. US/Israeli media briefings keep framing the delay as ”internal Iranian divisions”, the reality is more complicated and points toward weeks and months, not days.
Our point is that the complexity is large, and higher prices have only just started (given a scenario where the negotiations drag out in time). The market spent April leaning on the USD 90/bl rest-of-year assumption; that case is diminishing by the hour. If ”early May reopening” is replaced by ”June, July or later” over the next week or two, both crude and products have meaningful room to reprice higher from here. There is a high risk being short energy and betting on any immediate political resolution(!).
Analys
Market Still Betting on Timely Resolution, But Each Day Raises Shortage Risk
Down on Friday. Up on Monday. The Brent June crude oil contract traded down 5.1% last week to a close of $90.38/b. It reached a high of $103.87/b last Monday and a low of $86.09/b on Friday as Iran announced that the Strait of Hormuz was fully open for transit. That quickly changed over the weekend as the US upheld its blockade of Iranian oil exports while Iran naturally responded by closing the SoH again. The US blew a hole in the engine room of the Iranian ship TOUSKA and took custody of the ship on Sunday. Brent crude is up 5.6% this morning to $95.4/b.

The cease-fire is expiring tomorrow. The US has said it will send a delegation for a second round of negotiations in Islamabad in Pakistan. But Iran has for now rejected a second round of talks as it views US demands as unrealistic and excessive while the US is also blocking the Strait of Hormuz.
While Brent is up 5% this morning, the financial market is still very optimistic that progress will be made. That talks will continue and that the SoH will fully open by the start of May which is consistent with a rest-of-year average Brent crude oil price of around $90/b with the market now trading that balance at around $88/b.
Financial optimism vs. physical deterioration. We have a divergence where the financial market is trading negotiations, improvements and resolution while at the same time the physical market is deteriorating day by day. Physical oil flows remain constrained by disrupted flows, longer voyage times and elevated freight and insurance costs.
Financial markets are betting that a US/Iranian resolution will save us in time from violent shortages down the road. But every day that the SoH remains closed is bringing us closer to a potentially very painful point of shortages and much higher prices.
The US blockade is also a weapon of leverage against its European and Asian allies. When Iran closed the SoH it held the world economy as a hostage against the US. The US blockade of the SoH is of course blocking Iranian oil exports. But it is also an action of disruption directed towards Europe and Asia. The US has called for the rest of the world to engaged in the war with Iran: ”If you want oil from the Persian Gulf, then go and get it”. A risk is that the US plays brinkmanship with the global oil market directed towards its European and Asian allies and maybe even towards China to force them to engage and take part. Maybe unthinkable. But unthinkable has become the norm with Trump in the White House.


