Analys
LME Week 2014 på tre minuter

LME veckan är dagarna då industrin för basmetaller samlas i London och försöker bilda sig en uppfattning om var priserna på metallerna ska ta vägen nästa år. Upptakten till årets konferens var allt annat än positivt när basmetallerna kommit ner i pris och investmentbankerna sänkt utsikterna inför nästa år. Hemma efter årets LME-vecka sammanfattar vi diskussioner, teman och frågor.
Förväntningar
Inför årets tillställning reste vi till London med förväntansbilden av att Indonesiens exportförbud skulle föra nickel till årets snackis, tätt följt av de fysiska premierna för aluminium och LME:s aktion att införa en börshandlad fysisk premie efter att ha misslyckats lösa situationen med de långa köerna för att få ut aluminium ur LME-lagerhusen. I vår förväntansbild fanns inte det generellt negativa sentimentet kring makroutsikterna och metallmarknaderna inför 2015. Att Kina bromsar in har vi haft i korten i flera år och borde inte vara en överraskning för någon i branschen.
LME-seminariet
LME:s Vd, Gary Jones adresserade problemet med köer till lagerhusen redan i öppningsanförandet. Stora ord krävdes för att klä arbetet med att ta bort köerna men de maskerade inte LME:s misslyckande och kvittot kom när LME lanserade ett kontrakt för den fysiska premien. På så vis kan metallhandlare handla risken för att köerna och därmed premierna ska gå upp eller ner. En häpnadsväckande raffinerad lösning på ett problem med att få ut metalltackor ur ett plåthus med en gaffeltruck.
Generella teman
- Utbudet är viktigare än efterfrågan för priserna 2015
- Ökad nationalisering av naturtillgångar (Indonesien, nickel)
- Metallerna divergerar med allt mer åtskiljd fundamenta
- Lägre energipriser sänker metallprisgolvet genom lägre produktionskostnad
- Kinas husmarknad största orosmolnet på makrosidan
- Ökad volatilitet efter lanseringen av minikontrakt för retailmarknaden i Kina via LME:s kommande Hong Kong-kontrakt
- Lagerstatistik har blivit svårtolkad då stora lager finns utanför LME-husen
- Konsensus förväntan på när underskott ska uppstå per metall:
LME Week metall för metall
Nedan sammanfattar vi intrycken från diskussionerna per metall. Av de tre, zink, aluminium och koppar, som avhandlades på det officiella LME-seminariet trodde åhörarna att risken för prisuppgång var störst för Zn 43 % följt av Al 42% och sist koppar med 15%.
Koppar
Alla metaller pressas av ökat utbud utom koppar som pressas av förväntan om ökat utbud. Utbudstoppen har flyttats från 2014 till 2015 efter flera förseningar bland de stora projekten och Grasbergs minskade export under 2014 under Indonesiens exportförbud. Riskerna för utbudstoppen nästa år är mycket mindre då 30% av den kommer från normalisering i produktionen i vissa stora gruvor (bland annat Grasberg), 35% infasning av nya gruvor som börjat producera (de är förbi det mest kritiska stadiet) och 35% från nya greenfield- eller brownfieldprojekt. Kinas årliga tillväxt i kopparimport väntas falla till den lägsta på 6 år och kombinationen gör att priserna väntas ner under 2015 men sedan åter upp 2016 då pipelinen för kopparprojekt är tunn längre fram. Viktigaste produktionsfaktorerna under 2015 är Sierra Goroda, Sisha, Oyu Tolgoi, Caserones, Toromocho och Mine minestro Hales. Vi håller kvar vårt scenario med en koppardipp till 5500 USD/ton 2015 men där medelpriset blir mellan 5750 USD/ton.
Aluminium
Första halvan av 2014 dominerades av uppskruvade förväntningar på efterfrågan från Amerikansk bilindustri. I kombination med mycket trendföljande spekulation steg priset snabbt. Utsikterna för aluminium i bilindustrin har sedan dess delvis grusats när nästa generations bilar verkar gå från aluminium till höghållfasta supertunna stål. Indonesiens exportförbud har inte drivit upp priset på råvaran bauxit och avställd smältverkskapacitet finns hela tiden i bilden, redo att kliva in och dämpa långsiktiga prisrallyn. Det finns ingen brist på aluminium globalt men en del vittnar om brist i statistiken med oväntade poster på 850 Kt i Mexico ämnad för amerikanska marknaden. Kina och resten av världen är delvis separerade men om ex Kina går i underskott kommer Kinas export av halvfabrikat täcka upp. Vi behåller vårt scenario för 2015 med aluminium mellan 1800-2000 och 1900 USD/ton i medelpris.
Zink
Annalkande gruvstängningar börjar etablera sig som tema och zink är nu nästa nickel i mångas sinne. Tesen fick dock visst motstånd där man menar att det visserligen ska stängas några få riktigt stora gruvor men det finns å andra sidan ett stort antal små gruvor som kommer expandera med strategin att ta marknadsandelar i bakvattnet av de utbrutna. Svårt att bedöma sannolikheten med många små expansioner men vi står kvar i relativt positiv syn på zink med 2250 USD/ton som medelpris 2015
Nickel
Tveklöst den metall där deltagarna har störst tro på högre priser inför 2015. Underliggande fundamenta har förvärrats under året och kunskapen kring Filipinernas säsongsmönster i exporten som har täckt upp för Indonesiens exportförbud så här lång börjar sprida sig. Filipinerna går nu in i monsunperioden då regnfall minskar möjligheterna att exportera malm radikalt. Deltagarna räknar med att nickelmarknaden hamnar i underskott nästa år och att lagernivåer kommer konsumeras för att balansera marknaden. Högre prisestimat är ett tema och vårt scenario med snittpris på 23 000 USD/ton är visserligen en stor rörelse men finner relativt god acceptans. Nickel är i våra ögon den enda basmetall som har risk för prisuppgång på mer än 50 % under 2015 från dagens nivåer.
Analys
Quadruple whammy! Brent crude down $13 in four days

Brent Crude prices continued their decline heading into the weekend. On Friday, the price fell another USD 4 per barrel, followed by a further USD 3 per barrel drop this morning. This means Brent crude oil prices have crashed by a whopping USD 13 per barrel (-21%) since last Wednesday high, marking a significant decline in just four trading days. As of now, Brent crude is trading at USD 62.8 per barrel, its lowest point since February 2021.

The market has faced a ”quadruple whammy”:
#1: U.S. Tariffs: On Wednesday, the U.S. unveiled its new package of individual tariffs. The market reacted swiftly, as Trump followed through on his promise to rebalance the U.S. trade position with the world. His primary objective is a more balanced trade environment, which, naturally, weakened Brent crude prices. The widespread imposition of strict tariffs is likely to fuel concerns about an economic slowdown, which would weaken global oil demand. This macroeconomic uncertainty, especially regarding tariffs, calls for caution about the pace of demand growth.
#2: OPEC+ hike: Shortly after, OPEC+ announced plans to raise production in May by 41,000 bpd, exceeding earlier expectations with a three-monthly increment. OPEC emphasized that strong market fundamentals and a positive outlook were behind the decision. However, the decision likely stemmed from frustration within the cartel, particularly after months of excess production from Kazakhstan and Iraq. Saudi Arabia’s Energy Minister seemed to have reached his limit, emphasizing that the larger-than-expected May output hike would only be a “prelude” if those countries didn’t improve their performance. From Saudi Arabia’s perspective, this signals: ”All comply, or we will drag down the price.”
#3: China’s retaliation: Last Friday, even though the Chinese market was closed, firm indications came from China on how it plans to handle the U.S. tariffs. China is clearly meeting force with force, imposing 34% tariffs on all U.S. goods. This move raises fears of an economic slowdown due to reduced global trade, which would consequently weaken global oil demand going forward.
#4: Saudi price cuts: At the start of this week, oil prices continued to drop after Saudi Arabia slashed its flagship crude price by the most in over two years. Saudi Arabia reduced the Arab Light OSP by USD 2.3 per barrel for Asia in May, while prices to Europe and the U.S. were also cut.
These four key factors have driven the massive price drop over the last four trading days. The overarching theme is the fear of weaker demand and stronger supply. The escalating trade war has raised concerns about a potential global recession, leading to weaker demand, compounded by the surprisingly large output hike from OPEC+.
That said, it’s worth questioning whether the market is underestimating the risk of a U.S.-Iran conflict this year.
U.S. military mobilization and Iran’s resistance to diplomacy have raised the risk of conflict. Efforts to neutralize the Houthis suggest a buildup toward potential strikes on Iran. The recent Liberation Day episode further underscores that economic fallout is not a constraint for Trump, and markets may be underestimating the threat of war in the Middle East.
With this backdrop, we continue to forecast USD 70 per barrel for this year (2025). For reference, Brent crude averaged USD 75 per barrel in Q1-2025.
Analys
Lowest since Dec 2021. Kazakhstan likely reason for OPEC+ surprise hike in May

Collapsing after Trump tariffs and large surprise production hike by OPEC+ in May. Brent crude collapsed yesterday following the shock of the Trump tariffs on April 2 and even more so due to the unexpected announcement from OPEC+ that they will lift production by 411 kb/d in May which is three times as much as expected. Brent fell 6.4% yesterday with a close of USD 70.14/b and traded to a low of USD 69.48/b within the day. This morning it is down another 2.7% to USD 68.2/b. That is below the recent low point in early March of USD 68.33/b. Thus, a new ”lowest since December 2021” today.

Kazakhstan seems to be the problem and the reason for the unexpected large hike by OPEC+ in May. Kazakhstan has consistently breached its production cap. In February it produced 1.83 mb/d crude and 2.12 mb/d including condensates. In March its production reached a new record of 2.17 mb/d. Its crude production cap however is 1.468 mb/d. In February it thus exceeded its production cap by 362 kb/d.
Those who comply are getting frustrated with those who don’t. Internal compliance is an important and difficult issue when OPEC+ is holding back production. The problem naturally grows the bigger the cuts are and the longer they last as impatience grows over time. The cuts have been large, and they have lasted for a long time. And now some cracks are appearing. But that does not mean they cannot be mended. And it does not imply either that the group is totally shifting strategy from Price to Volume. It is still a measured approach. Also, by lifting all caps across the voluntary cutters, Kazakhstan becomes less out of compliance. Thus, less cuts by Kazakhstan are needed in order to become compliant.
While not a shift from Price to Volume, the surprise hike in May is clearly a sign of weakness. The struggle over internal compliance has now led to a rupture in strategy and more production in May than what was previously planned and signaled to the market. It is thus natural to assign a higher production path from the group for 2025 than previously assumed. Do however remember how quickly the price war between Russia and Saudi Arabia ended in the spring of 2020.
Higher production by OPEC+ will be partially countered by lower production from Venezuela and Iran. The new sanctions towards Iran and Venezuela can to a large degree counter the production increase from OPEC+. But to what extent is still unclear.
Buy some oil calls. Bullish risks are never far away. Rising risks for US/Israeli attack on Iran? The US has increased its indirect attacks on Iran by fresh attacks on Syria and Yemen lately. The US has also escalated sanctions towards the country in an effort to force Iran into a new nuclear deal. The UK newspaper TheSun yesterday ran the following story: ”ON THE BRINK US & Iran war is ‘INEVITABLE’, France warns as Trump masses huge strike force with THIRD of America’s stealth bombers”. This is indeed a clear risk which would lead to significant losses of supply of oil in the Middle East and probably not just from Iran. So, buying some oil calls amid the current selloff is probably a prudent thing to do for oil consumers.
Brent crude is rejoining the US equity selloff by its recent collapse though for partially different reasons. New painful tariffs from Trump in combination with more oil from OPEC+ is not a great combination.

Analys
Tariffs deepen economic concerns – significantly weighing on crude oil prices

Brent crude prices initially maintained the gains from late March and traded sideways during the first two trading days in April. Yesterday evening, the price even reached its highest point since mid-February, touching USD 75.5 per barrel.
However, after the U.S. president addressed the public and unveiled his new package of individual tariffs, the market reacted accordingly. Overnight, Brent crude dropped by close to USD 4 per barrel, now trading at USD 71.6 per barrel.
Key takeaways from the speech include a baseline tariff rate of 10% for all countries. Additionally, individual reciprocal tariffs will be imposed on countries with which the U.S. has the largest trade deficits. Many Asian economies end up at the higher end of the scale, with China facing a significant 54% tariff. In contrast, many North and South American countries are at the lower end, with a 10% tariff rate. The EU stands at 20%, which, while not unexpected given earlier signals, is still disappointing, especially after Trump’s previous suggestion that there might be some easing.
Once again, Trump has followed through on his promise, making it clear that he is serious about rebalancing the U.S. trade position with the world. While some negotiation may still occur, the primary objective is to achieve a more balanced trade environment. A weaker U.S. dollar is likely to be an integral part of this solution.
Yet, as the flow of physical goods to the U.S. declines, the natural question arises: where will these goods go? The EU may be forced to raise tariffs on China, mirroring U.S. actions to protect its industries from an influx of discounted Chinese goods.
Initially, we will observe the effects in soft economic data, such as sentiment indices reflecting investor, industry, and consumer confidence, followed by drops in equity markets and, very likely, declining oil prices. This will eventually be followed by more tangible data showing reductions in employment, spending, investments, and overall economic activity.
Ref oil prices moving forward, we have recently adjusted our Brent crude price forecast. The widespread imposition of strict tariffs is expected to foster fears of an economic slowdown, potentially reducing oil demand. Macroeconomic uncertainty, particularly regarding tariffs, warrants caution regarding the pace of demand growth. Our updated forecast of USD 70 per barrel for 2025 and 2026, and USD 75 per barrel for 2027, reflects a more conservative outlook, influenced by stronger-than-expected U.S. supply, a more politically influenced OPEC+, and an increased focus on fragile demand.
___
US DOE data:
Last week, U.S. crude oil refinery inputs averaged 15.6 million barrels per day, a decrease of 192 thousand barrels per day from the previous week. Refineries operated at 86.0% of their total operable capacity during this period. Gasoline production increased slightly, averaging 9.3 million barrels per day, while distillate (diesel) production also rose, averaging 4.7 million barrels per day.
U.S. crude oil imports averaged 6.5 million barrels per day, up by 271 thousand barrels per day from the prior week. Over the past four weeks, imports averaged 5.9 million barrels per day, reflecting a 6.3% year-on-year decline compared to the same period last year.
The focus remains on U.S. crude and product inventories, which continue to impact short-term price dynamics in both WTI and Brent crude. Total commercial petroleum inventories (excl. SPR) increased by 5.4 million barrels, a modest build, yet insufficient to trigger significant price movements.
Commercial crude oil inventories (excl. SPR) rose by 6.2 million barrels, in line with the 6-million-barrel build forecasted by the API. With this latest increase, U.S. crude oil inventories now stand at 439.8 million barrels, which is 4% below the five-year average for this time of year.
Gasoline inventories decreased by 1.6 million barrels, exactly matching the API’s reported decline of 1.6 million barrels. Diesel inventories rose by 0.3 million barrels, which is close to the API’s forecast of an 11-thousand-barrel decrease. Diesel inventories are currently 6% below the five-year average.
Over the past four weeks, total products supplied, a proxy for U.S. demand, averaged 20.1 million barrels per day, a 1.2% decrease compared to the same period last year. Gasoline supplied averaged 8.8 million barrels per day, down 1.9% year-on-year. Diesel supplied averaged 3.8 million barrels per day, marking a 3.7% increase from the same period last year. Jet fuel demand also showed strength, rising 4.2% over the same four-week period.
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Ticking higher as tariff-panic eases. Demand growth and OPEC+ will be key
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude prices hold gains amid fresh tariff threats
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Ett samtal om råvarorna som behövs för batterier
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Tysklands SEFE skriver avtal om att köpa 1,5 miljarder ton LNG per år från Delfin i USA
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
700 timmar med negativa elpriser och dyrare biobränsle gav lägre resultat för Jämtkraft
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Danska Seaborg Technologies siktar på serieproduktion av smältsaltsreaktorer till mitten av 2030-talet
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Brent Edges Lower After Resisting Equity Slump – Sanctions, Saudi Pricing in Focus
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Oljepriserna slaktas på samtidiga negativa faktorer