Analys
Kinafrossa inför 2018 – Råvaruplanket

Råvarupriser har stigit markant under 2017, främst är det basmetallkomplexet som handlas omkring 20% högre sedan Kinas ekonomi utvecklats starkt i bakvattnet av 2015 och 16 års stimulanser. Oljepriset har också stigit, dock bara 8% över året men 35% sedan årets botten i juni. För olja har de fallande globala lagernivåerna varit avgörande, marknadens betydande överskott ser ut att var under avveckling och balans närmar sig. OPEC har fått hela äran och förlängningen av OPEC-avtalet hyllades av marknaden.
Vi tror att Kinas pågående produktionsreform kommer vara en mer långsiktig, strukturell förändring i råvarumarknaden än vad som initialt annonserats. Genom att minska på överproduktionen av vissa råvaror kan Kina slå två flugor i en smäll: lönsamheten stiger för de producenter som får vara kvar och luften blir bättre vilket gynnar alla.
Trots det ser första halvåret 2018 kritiskt ut för Kina. Stimulansinjektionen har slutat verka, uppgången i bostadspriserna har stannat av i de stora städerna, investeringarna har minskat både från statliga och privata bolag. Mer stimulanser kommer säkert men först måste det blir sämre, vilket betyder att nästa stimulansvåg är att vänta tidigast andra halvåret 2018. Fram till dess ser vi risk för tillfällig dipp i basmetaller.
Motvind i öknen
Även oljepriset står inför en nedgång när säsongsmönstret för den påbörjade lagernedgången byter rikting och börjar stiga under första kvartalet. Skifferoljan står också inför ökad aktivitet när höstens högre oljepris slår igenom med början i fler riggar till fälten. Vi har ett oljepris på USD 51 för 2018.
Vår syn för Q1-Q2 2018:
Basmetaller
Striktare plan för luftföroreningar
Vi argumenterar för att när regeringen väl lyckats få en del av kapaciteten ur produktion så kommer den inte tillbaka. Det sammanfaller med regeringens långsiktiga mål att få bort olönsam småskalig produktion i miljöbelastande segment samtidigt som det gynnar de producenter som får vara kvar och säljer till högre pris.
Oron för Kina är makrobaserad och utbudsreformerna kommer sannolikt bara delvis hålla emot. Uppgången i fastighetspriserna har bromsat in, initialt kontrollerat, men nu växer oron för att de ska börja falla. Tillväxten i investeringar faller också efter snart två år utan stimulanser. Oron i investerarkollektivet växer då president Xi Jingping inte ”pratat upp” tillväxten, snarare motsatsen genom att säga att Kina prioriterar tillväxt av bättre kvalité.
Aluminium gynnas av produktionsreformer
Aluminium är den basmetall som gynnas mest av omstrukturering i Kinas produktion likt den i stålindustrin. Det skulle innebära mindre produktion från de olönsamma verken under den kommande vintern. Vi har USD 2175 som medelprognos för 2018.
Zinkrallyt har planat ut
Även för zink finns det viss påverkan från nedstängningar i Kina men med zink över USD 3000 ser vi ökad risk från mer produktion till marknaden plus makrorisk från Kina på efterfrågan. Vi har USD 2960 som medelprognos 2018.
Nickel – volatil men intressant
Bland metaller som både drabbas av Kinas stängningar och rider på elbilsrevolutionen finns en tydlig stjärna och det är nickel. Metallens höga volatilitet gör dock att det är en nervös exponering. Vi har USD 13000 som medelprognos 2018.
Koppar – stöd i cykeln men makroexponerad
Koppar är den basmetall där de senaste årens låga investeringar börjar göra sig påmind genom en allt tunnare projektpipeline. Tillsammans med en högre påverkan från utbudsstörningar tror vi att koppar, rent cykliskt kan få bättre stöd framöver. På den negativa sidan är koppar fortfarande den metall som har högst Kinaexponering och speciellt mot fastighetsmarknaden. Vi har USD 6325 som medelprognos 2018.
Energi
Sommarens amerikanska ”driving season” blev startskottet på höstens oljeprisuppgång. På grund av att USA är en så stor del av globala lager har även de globala fallit som konsekvens av USA:s driving season och ökade export. Trots det har inte lagernivåerna kommit ner till normala nivåer, som är OPEC:s mål i den nuvarande kampanjen. Dessutom har Venezuelas kaosartade finansiella situation och Kronprins MBS framfart under antikorruptionskampanjen adderat en ordentlig riskpremie i oljepriset.
Skifferoljan är vinnare
I vår modell, som tjänat oss väl sedan oljekollapsen 2014, kommer antalet riggar att öka framöver som effekt av oljepriset vände i juli. Oljepriset leder produktionen med omkring 160 dagar och antalet riggar i oljefälten leder produktionen med omkring 80 dagar. Båda dessa ledande indikatorer talat nu för att produktionen kommer stiga under H1 2018.
OPEC-avtalet en tom gest
Även om OPEC har överraskat både oss och marknaden med bättre genomförande av de avtalade produktionssänkningarna än historiskt så tycker vi allt för mycket av lagernedgången tillskrivs OPEC. Ryssland sänker från rekordhöga nivåer som referenspunkt och mycket av sänkningarna utanför Saudiarabien är mer att betrakta som passiva sänkningar än aktiva. De fallande lagren är också en säsongsfaktor som kommer jobba mot OPEC under första kvartalet och vi tror då att oljan handlas ner mot USD 50 igen.
Slutet på avtalet under 2018
Under nästa år kommer fokus på tiden efter OPEC-avtalet att växa: Ryssland har understrukit att man vill ut ur avtalet så fort marknaden är i balans. Vårt mer negativa makroscenario för Kina kommer också att underminera priset när efterfrågan där inte motsvara förväntningarna. Vårt huvudscenario för nästa år är att USA adderar omkring 10 riggar per vecka under första halvåret, OPEC tar ingen ny riktning vid nästa OPEC-möte den 22a juni. Vid OPEC mötet i nov/dec avslutas avtalet och vi tror Brentoljan handlas på USD 51/fat i medel. Den största risken för vårt scenario ser vi i en finansiell kollaps i Venezuela som spiller över på oljeproduktionen eller mer aktivt motstånd bland saudiske prins MBS rivaler.
Ädelmetaller
Guldpriset har stigit 8% i år och fått en mycket tydligare koppling till risk och oro. Största hickan på senare år kom 2016 under Brexitomröstningen men utan stöd av vidare oro i aktiemarknaden har guld fallit tillbaka igen. Nordkoreas vapenskrammel har också fått guld att stiga men senaste tiden har guld pressats av en allt starkare USD och fortsatt frammarsch med räntehöjningar från Fed. Nästa val i raden är Italien som ska vara klart senast i maj nästa år men konsensusbilden verkar vara att det kommer inträffa i april. Just nu verkar Italiensk politik vara utanför marknadens radar då Italiensk statistik varit relativt bra på senaste tiden. Vi ser dock en tydlig risk att italiensk, EU-fientlig politik blossar upp igen i början av nästa år.
Utkonkurrerad av Bitcoin
Under det senaste året har dock guld fått stark konkurrens av bitcoin som alternativ tillgång och motvikt till det etablerade monetära systemet. Bitcoins har stigit på ett vis som inte går att relatera till traditionella risktillgångar och tilltalar delvis en liknande publik som guldinvesterare.
Fed höjer vidare
USA tror vi har mindre betydelse för guld framöver. Fed har genomfört fem höjningar som passerat marknaden utan något problem. Trots Fed:s optimistiska syn på konjunkturen räknar vi med att de finansiella förhållandena försämras framöver. Vår prognos är att Fed slutar höja styrräntan 2018 efter höjning i mars och september, därefter drabbas USA av lågkonjunktur 2019. I det scenariot står guld kvar som en fast tillgång som investerare gillar.
Jordbruk
Under de senaste två åren har vi argumenterat för att riskerna inför skörd skapar en osäkerhet som driver riskpremien för högt och när skörden väl landat i lagerhusen pyser riskpremien ut igen. Temat upprepade sig och vi handlar nu väldigt nära vårt riktmärke för decemberterminen i intervallet mot 160-165 EUR/ton.
Ryssland fortsätter sätta press
Förra året blev Rysslands höga veteexport ett sänke för MATIF-priserna. Det blev en repris i år. Vi ser också en stor sannolikhet för en repris 2018. USA kommer visserligen minska arealen ytterligare med kanske 2-3% efter att ha minskat den med 8,5% i år. Ryssland kommer å andra sidan odla konstant areal och skicket på höstsådda vetet är bättre än vid samma tid förra året. Australiens avkastning blev i år 40% lägre, 1,69 ton/ha mot 2,5 normalt. Vi tror att den skörden kommer normaliseras och sammantaget talar därför utsikterna för 2018 för en repris där decemberterminen förfaller omkring 160 EUR/ton även 2018.
[box]Handelsbankens råvarukommentar är producerad av Handelsbanken och publiceras i samarbete och med tillstånd på Råvarumarknaden.se[/box]
Ansvarsbegränsning
Handelsbanken Capital Markets, som är en division inom Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ) (i fortsättningen kallad ”SHB”), är ansvarig för sammanställningen av analysrapporter. I Sverige står SHB under tillsyn av Finansinspektionen, i Norge av norska Finansinspektionen, i Finland av finska Finansinspektionen och i Danmark av danska Finansinspektionen. Alla analysrapporter bygger på information från handels- och statistiktjänster och annan information som SHB bedömt vara tillförlitlig. SHB har emellertid inte själv verifierat informationen och kan inte garantera att informationen är sann, korrekt eller fullständig. I den mån lagen tillåter tar varken SHB, styrelseledamöter, tjänstemän eller medarbetare, eller någon annan person, ansvar för någon som helst förlust, oavsett om den uppstår till följd av användning av en analysrapport eller dess innehåll eller på annat sätt uppstår i anslutning till något i denna.
Analys
How renewable fuels are accelerating the decarbonisation of transport

On 16 November 2022, UK’s Royal Air Force (RAF) Voyager aircraft, the military variant of the Airbus A330, took to the skies for 90 minutes over Oxfordshire. What looked like a routine test flight in its outward appearance was ultimately deemed ground-breaking. Why? It was a world-first military transporter aircraft flight, and the first of any aircraft type in the UK to be completed using 100% sustainable jet fuel.

What are renewable fuels?
Renewable hydrocarbon biofuels (also called green or drop-in biofuels) are fuels produced from biomass sources through a variety of biological, thermal, and chemical processes. These products are chemically identical to petroleum gasoline, diesel, or jet fuel.
In other words, renewable fuels are sources of energy chemically identical to fossil fuels but produced from domestic, commercial, or agricultural waste (see Figure 1 below).
Figure 1: Converting waste into energy

Why the excitement?
Renewable fuels, like renewable diesel and sustainable jet fuel, can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by around 80-90% compared to fossil fuels. And because they burn much cleaner, engine filters remain cleaner for longer reducing the need for maintenance. Furthermore, given used cooking oil, vegetable oil, processing waste, and animal fat waste are used as inputs, the production of these fuels reduces biowaste, thereby cutting emissions from landfills.
This makes renewable fuels a key component of the circular economy. Humans have largely operated on the linear model historically when it comes to utilising natural resources. The circular model, in contrast, is much less wasteful and seeks to recycle as much as possible (see Figure 2 below).
Figure 2: The Circular Economy

The most exciting thing about renewable fuels is the immediacy with which they can make an impact. The reason why they are referred to as drop-in fuels is that they can replace fossil fuels in internal combustion engines with little or no modification required. So, if supply was abundant enough, forms of transport which cannot be electrified easily like heavy duty trucks, ships, and aeroplanes can be switched across to renewable fuels making a significant improvement to the environmental footprint. According to BP, “A return flight between London and San Francisco has a carbon footprint per economy ticket of nearly 1 tonne of CO2 equivalent. With the aviation industry expected to double to over 8 billion passengers by 2050, it is essential that we act to reduce aviation’s carbon emissions.”
The challenge
Renewable fuels or biofuels are still in their infancy. This means the obvious hurdle to overcome is cost competitiveness with fossil fuels. Cost estimates vary, but figures from the International Air Transport Association (IATA) provide a useful sense for the ballpark. In May 2022, IATA stated that the average worldwide price of jet fuel is about $4.15 per gallon compared to the US average price of a gallon of sustainable aviation fuel, which is about $8.67.
So, roughly double the price of the incumbent polluting technology. This is not a bad starting point at all. Considering how rapidly the cost of energy storage in batteries has fallen in the last decade, renewable fuels could become competitive quite soon if sufficient investment is made and economies of scale are achieved. IATA also predicts that renewable fuels could make up 2% of all aviation fuels by 2025, which could become a tipping point in their competitiveness.
Businesses are acting
Businesses pursuing their own net zero targets have already started exploring renewable fuels to minimise their waste. Darling Ingredients Inc, which produces its trademark Diamond Green Diesel from recycled animal fats, inedible corn oil, and used cooking oil, was chosen by fast food chain Chick-fil-A in March 2022 to turn its used cooking oil into clean transportation fuel.
Similarly, McDonald’s entered into a partnership with Neste Corporation in 2020 to convert its used vegetable oil into renewable diesel and fuel the trucks that make deliveries to its restaurants. According to TortoiseEcofin, both Darling Ingredients and Neste have a net negative carbon footprint given emissions produced by these businesses are lower that the emissions avoided because of their renewable fuels.
A final word
Renewable fuels alone will not tackle climate change. No single solution can. But they can help us make meaningful progress. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) emphasises how crucial it is for the world to halve its greenhouse gas emissions this decade to at least have a chance of limiting global warming to 1.5oC. This means that solutions with an immediate effect have an important role to play. Biofuels can cut emissions from waste in landfills and provide much cleaner alternatives to fossil fuels to help accelerate the world’s decarbonisation efforts. They don’t require different engines to be of use. They just need funding to reach scale.
Mobeen Tahir, Director, Macroeconomic Research & Tactical Solutions, WisdomTree
Analys
SEB Metals Weekly: China Covid exit is bullish for metals

China Covid exit is bullish for metals
Softer inflation, slight macro-optimism, and China taking a rapid exit from Covid restrictions. Markets have become more optimistic. Inflation indices have eased and that has created some hopes that central banks won’t lift interest to a level that will kill the economy in 2023. Natural gas prices in Europe have fallen sharply. This has suddenly reduced energy-inflationary pressure and removed the direst downside economic risks for the region. But general market optimism is far from super-strong yet. The S&P 500 index has only gained 1.9% since our previous forecast on 1 Nov 2021, and oil prices are down nearly 10% in a reflection of concerns for global growth. China has however removed all Covid-restrictions almost overnight. It is now set to move out of its three years of Covid-19 isolation and lockdowns at record speed. Industrial metals are up 20% and the Hong Kong equity index is up 40% as a result (since 1 Nov-22). China’s sudden and rapid Covid-19 exit is plain and simply bullish for the Chinese economy to the point that mobility indices are already rebounding quickly. SEB’s general view is that inflation impulses will fade quickly. No need then for central banks across the world to kill the global economy with further extreme rate hikes. These developments have removed much of the downside price risks for metals in 2023 and we have to a large degree shifted our 2024 forecast to 2023.
Lower transparency, more geopolitics, more borders, and higher prices and exponential spikes. The first decade of this century was about emerging markets, the BRICs, the commodity price boom, the commodity investment boom, and free markets with free flow of commodities and labor with China and Russia hand in hand with western countries walking towards the future. High capex spending in the first decade led to plentiful supply and low prices for commodities from 2011 to 2020. A world of plenty, friends everywhere, free flow of everything, and no need to worry. The coming decade will likely be very different. Supply growth will struggle due to mediocre capex spending over the past 10 years. Prices will on average be significantly higher. There will be frequent exponential price spikes whenever demand hits supply barriers. Price transparency will be significantly reduced due to borders, taxes, sanctions, geopolitical alignments, and carbon intensities. Prices will be much less homogenous. Aluminium will no longer be just one price and one quality. Who made it, where was it made, where will it be consumed and what the carbon content will create a range of prices. Same for most other metals.
Copper: Struggling supply and China revival propel copper prices higher. Unrest in Peru is creating significant supply risks for copper as the country accounts for 10% of the global supply. Chile accounts for 27% of global production. Production there is disappointing with Codelco, the Chilean state-owned copper mining company, struggling to hit production targets. The Cobre Panama mine in Panama is at risk of being closed over a tax dispute between Quantum and the government. Cobre Panama is one of the biggest new mines globally over the past 10 years. The rapid exit from Covid restrictions in China is bullish for the Chinese economy and thus for copper demand and it has helped to propel prices higher along with the mentioned supply issues. The Chinese property market will continue to struggle, and it normally accounts for 20% of global copper demand while China accounted for 55% of global copper demand in 2021. While China is no longer prioritizing the housing market it is full speed ahead for solar, wind, EVs, and electrification in general. So, weakening Chinese copper demand from housing will likely be replaced by the new prioritized growth sectors. Global supply growth is likely going to be muted in the decade to come while demand growth will be somewhere between a normal 3% pa. to a strong 4% pa. to a very strong 5% pa. Copper prices will be high, and demand will hit the supply barrier repeatedly with exponential spikes as the world is working hard to accelerate the energy transition. Copper prices could easily spike to USD 15-16,000/ton nearest years.
Nickel: Tight high-quality nickel market but a surplus for a low-quality nickel. Nickel production is growing aggressively in Indonesia. The country is projected to account for 60-70% of global supply in 2030. This will become a huge and extremely concentrated geopolitical risk for the world’s consumers of nickel. Indonesia has an abundance of low-grade C2 nickel. The challenge is to convert low-quality C2 nickel to high-quality C1. We are set for a surplus of C2 nickel but the market for C1 nickel will depend strongly on the conversion capacity for C2 to C1. Low price transparency will also help to send prices flying between USD 20,000/ton and USD 30,000/ton. Strong growth in nickel production in Indonesia should initially call for prices down to USD 20,000/ton. But Indonesia is a price setter. It will account for 50% of global supply in 2023. It doesn’t make sense for Indonesia to kill the nickel price. If the nickel price drops, then Indonesia could quickly regulate supply. There should be a premium to nickel due to this. As a result, we expect the nickel price to average USD 24,000/ton in 2023. C2 to C1 conversion capacity may be strained and there should also be a monopoly premium due to the size of Indonesia. Converting C2 to C1 is however extremely carbon intensive and that could be an increasing issue in the years to come.
Zinc: Super-tight global market. European LME inventories are ZERO and zinc smelters there are still closed. European zinc smelters account for 16% of global zinc smelter capacity. Most of this was closed over the past year due to extremely high energy prices. European LME zinc stockpiles are now down to a stunning zero! The global zinc market is extremely tight. Reopening of European zinc smelting seems unlikely in H1-23 with a continued super-tight market as a result both in Europe and globally.
Aluminium: Price likely to be in the range of USD 2400 – 3200/ton and line with coal prices in China. Aluminium prices have historically been tightly tied to the price of coal. But coal prices have been all over the place since the start of 2021 with huge price differences between Amsterdam, Australia, and domestic Chinese coal prices which are now largely state-controlled. China banning imports of Australian coal, the Chinese energy crisis in 2021, and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 are ingredients here. This sent aluminium prices flying high and low. Coal prices in China today imply a price of aluminium between USD 2400/ton and 3150/ton with the LME 3mth aluminium price nicely in between at USD 2590/ton. The global coal market should now become more orderly as China now again is accepting Australian coal. Energy costs have fallen sharply in Europe and some producers in the Netherlands have talked about possible restarts of production. China is likely to reduce its exports of primary aluminium. Energy security of supply is high on the agenda in China, and it makes no sense to emit lots of CO2 in China and indirectly export energy in the form of primary aluminium. Growth in non-China aluminium demand in the years to come will have to be covered by non-China producers which have the potential to force prices higher and away from coal as the price driver. While LME has one price for the 3mth aluminium price we’ll likely get larger and larger price differences across the world in the form of possibly extreme price premiums for example in the EU and the US.

Analys
Solid demand growth and strained supply to push Brent above USD 100/b


Brent crude had a strong end of the year as it traded at the highest level since 1 December. It is a slow start to the new year due to bank holidays and Dated Brent trades close to USD 85/b. It averaged USD 99.9/b in 2022. We expect it to average more than USD 100/b on average for the coming year amid strained supply and rebounding demand. Chinese oil demand is set to recover strongly along with re-openings while non-OECD will continue to move higher. At the moment oil looks absurdly cheap as it is cheaper than natural gas in both EU and Japan and also cheaper than coal in Australia.
Some price strength at the end of the year. The Dated Brent crude oil price index gained 2.3% on Friday with a close at USD 84.97/b. It was the highest close since 1 December. This morning it is trading slightly lower at USD 84.8/b but the market is basically void of action due to bank holidays.

Gloom and doom but IEA, OPEC and US EIA project global crude oil demand to rise between 1 m b/d and 2.2 m b/d YoY in 2023. They also expect call-on-OPEC to rise between 0.3 m b/d and 1.0 m b/d. The US EIA projects demand to increase 1 m b/d in 2023 on the back of a growth of 1.3 m b/d in non-OECD where demand in India rises by 0.2 m b/d and China by 0.6 m b/d. In China this is of course to a large degree due to re-opening after Covid-19 lock-downs. But it is still a good reminder of the low base of oil demand in non-OECD versus OECD. India last year consumed 5 m b/d which only amounts to 1.3 b/capita/year versus a world average of 4.5 b/capita/year and European demand of 10 b/capita/year. Even China is still below the world average as its demand in 2022 stood at 15.2 m b/d or 4.0 b/capita/yr. Non-OECD oil demand thus still has a long way to go in terms of oil demand and that is probably one of the things we’ll be reminded of in 2023 as Covid-19 lock-downs disappear entirely.
Solid demand growth in the face of strained supply. Important to remember is that the world has lost a huge amount of fossil supply from Russia due to the war in Ukraine. First in terms of natural gas where supply to the EU and thus to the world has declined by some 2.5 m boe/d versus pre-war levels. Secondly in terms of crude and products. The latter is of course a constant guessing game in terms of how much Russian crude and product exports has declined. The US EIA however projects that crude oil production in the Former Soviet Union will be down 2 m b/d in 2023 versus pre-Covid levels and down 1.3 m b/d YoY from 2022 to 2023. We are thus talking up to 4.5 m boe/d of lost supply from Russia/FSU. That is a huge loss. It is the reason why coal prices are still trading at USD 200 – 400/ton versus normal USD 85/ton as coal is an alternative to very expensive natural gas.
Overall for 2023 we are looking at a market where we’ll have huge losses in supply of fossil energy supply from Russia while demand for oil is set to rebound solidly (+1.0 – 2.2 m b/d) along with steady demand growth in non-OECD plus a jump in demand from China due to Covid-19 reopening. Need for oil from OPEC is set to rise by up to 1.0 m b/d YoY while the group’s spare capacity is close to exhausted.
We expect Brent crude to average more than USD 100/b in 2023. Despite all the macro economic gloom and doom due to inflation and rising interest rates we cannot help having a positive view for crude oil prices for the year to come due to the above reasons. The Dated Brent crude oil price index averaged USD 99.9/b in 2022. We think Brent crude will average more than USD 100/b in 2023. Oil is today absurdly cheap at USD 85/b. It is cheaper than both coal in Australia and natural gas both in Japan and the EU. This is something you hardly ever see. The energy market will work hard to consume more what is cheap (oil) and less of what is expensive (nat gas and coal).
Latest forecasts by IEA, OPEC and US EIA for oil demand growth and call-on-OPEC YoY for 2023. Solid demand growth and rising need for oil from OPEC.

Oil demand projections from the main agencies and estimated call-on-OPEC. More demand and higher need for oil from OPEC

EIA STEO projected change in oil demand for different countries and regions YoY to 2023

US EIA Dec STEO forecast for FSU oil production. Solid decline projected for 2023.

US commercial crude and product stocks still below normal

Total US crude and product stocks including SPR. Declining, declining, declining.

US crude and product inventories both excluding and including Strategic Petroleum Reserves

US oil sales from US SPR is now coming to an end. Will make the market feel much tighter as it really is.

Brent crude oil is absurdly cheap as it today trades below both Australian coal and natural gas in both Japan and the EU. Coal and natural gas prices should trade lower while oil should trade higher.

EU diesel prices versus natural gas prices. Could start to move towards a more natural price-balance in terms of substitution.

-
Nyheter4 veckor ago
Lundin Mining är ett diversifierat gruvbolag med en betydande kopparproduktion
-
Nyheter3 veckor ago
Oljepriset ser ut att vända uppåt i mars-april
-
Nyheter4 veckor ago
Fallande naturgaspriser i USA hjälper till att sänka inflationen
-
Nyheter4 dagar ago
Oljepriset lägre än intervallet där USA ska köpa tillbaka olja – över hela terminskurvan
-
Nyheter3 veckor ago
Ryssland har stoppat oljeleveranserna till Polen via Druzhba-ledningen
-
Nyheter4 veckor ago
Priset på naturgas i USA nere på 2 USD
-
Nyheter3 dagar ago
Oman tar ett stort steg i att bli en stor producent av vätgas
-
Nyheter2 dagar ago
Den stora oljeoptimisten Goldman Sachs tror inte längre på 100 USD-olja i år