Analys
Defensive Assets: Gold, a precious ally in the fight against equity drawdown
In the previous instalments of this blog series, we highlighted the defensive behaviour of quality and high dividend equities, long duration government bonds and safe haven currencies as an asset, as well as an overlay to other asset classes. The last few weeks really put investors’ portfolio to the test and the least we can say is that those defensive assets did very well. While Global Equities (MSCI World net TR) lost 17.91% from the most recent tops on 12th February up to 9th March, Long Duration Treasuries (proxied by the Bloomberg Barclays US Treasury 10+) have return an incredible +21.99%. In the same period, Japanese Yen was up 7.54% versus the US Dollar and Quality stocks (proxied by the WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth net TR) did cushion the fall, losing 15.73% and therefore outperforming the market by 2.27%1.
This week, our journey takes us to a fourth asset class, Commodities. Using our defensive framework, we will assess how single commodities or commodity sectors react to equity downturn. In particular, we will highlight how:
- precious metals such as Gold can bring potential diversification and defensiveness to a portfolio as well as act as inflation hedge on the upside. Gold was up 6.96% from 12th February to 9th March 2020;
- Broad commodities could act as a diversifier in a multi asset portfolio.
In the following, we analyse traditional Commodity benchmarks that use front month futures to invest in the different commodities in the universe (being commodities in general or sectors). The only exception are precious metals, were physical investments are considered (physical bullions in vaults for Gold for example). Enhanced commodities are meant to represent “smart beta” in commodities where the strategy can invest further along the curve (i.e. not always in the front month future) to improve the roll yield available to the investor while delivering similar spot and collateral returns. More information on this topic is available on our website. Those strategies have historically delivered strong outperformance over time while keeping the correlation with the benchmark very high.
Precious Metals stands out in Commodities
Our framework focuses on 4 characteristics, risk reduction, asymmetry of returns, diversification and valuation. Starting with drawdown protection in Figure 1, it is pretty clear that broad commodities and most commodities sectors are cyclical in nature. Enhanced Commodities fare better than traditional benchmark overall, but the standout defensive asset is precious metals and in particular Gold. In 5 out of the 6 drawdown periods, Gold performed positively, delivering 14.4% per year on average. To put this result in perspective, over those 6 periods, European equities have delivered -35.2%, Min Volatility equities -17.8%, Cash +2.8%, EUR Treasury AAA 8.4% and USD Treasury 11.3%2.
It is worth noting, however, that Energy can also deliver some downside protection when the equity downturn is the result of external shocks such as geopolitical uncertainties. In such, cases Energy and Oil, in particular, tend to react on the upside providing some protection aligned with Gold.
Looking further at the performance of Precious Metals in periods of drawdown we observe in figure 2 that over the 10 worst quarters for European equities in the last 20 years, Gold has 7 quarters of positive performance – a rate of 70%. On average gold outperformed equities by 19% in those quarters. Silver provides results that are more mixed despite outperforming equities by 14% on average. While over the full period commodities didn’t provide a positive return, in 8 of the 10 periods they outperformed equity markets by 8% on average proving that they are still a powerful diversifier. Enhanced Commodities fared even better outperforming equities by 9.6% on average per quarter.
Commodities a chief diversifier
In fact, the rolling 3Y correlation between commodities and equities remains consistently below 50% with long periods where it is nil or even negative. From a pure portfolio construction point of view, this is very exciting as it hands us a diversifying asset that can help reduce the overall volatility of the portfolio.
Gold, a precious tool to build defensive portfolios
From a more macroeconomic perspective and looking at Commodities performance across business cycles, it is again very clear that Precious Metals offer a protection in economic slowdown or recession. In Figure 3, we have split the last 20 years in 4 types of periods using the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) Composite Leading indicator (“CLI”). The CLI has been designed to decrease a few months before economy start to slow down or increase before the economy restarts. So, a strong decline in CLI tends to indicate a probable downturn in equity markets for example.
Enhanced Commodities behaved very well compared to front month commodities, cutting significantly the downside in negative economic environments and doing better in positive ones. It is worth noting as well the extent to which commodities and enhanced commodities perform when the economic signals are strong. This is linked to the well documented properties of commodities as an inflation hedge. Precious Metals exhibit a very strong and versatile profile driven mainly by gold.
It is interesting to note that Gold has outperformed very strongly in very negative or negative economic scenarios but also has done very well in periods of strong economic rebound, buoyed by its inflation hedge proprieties. This makes Gold a pretty asymmetric asset with strong positive performance in difficult economic periods but also good performance in strong rebound and when yields are expected to increase. Silver, similarly to palladium and platinum, offers also an interesting payoff, behaving part like a precious metal and part like an industrial metal. In periods where the economy is strong, it benefits from being used in the industry and behave more pro cyclically than gold. However, in economic downturn, it benefits from its status as a precious metal and delivers some protection.
This brings us to our fourth pillar in our framework: valuation. WisdomTree issued its quarterly outlook for Gold in January 2020, offering a number of scenarios fo the metal this year. In “Gold: how we value the precious metal”, we explain how we characterise gold’s past behaviour. Unlike other commodities where the balance of physical supply and demand influence the price, gold behaves more like a pseudo currency, driven by more macroeconomic variables like the interest rate environment, inflation, exchange rates and sentiment. Characterising gold’s past behaviour allows us to project where gold could go in the future (assuming it maintains consistent behaviour) using an internal model. In recent weeks, given the sharp rise in volatility of many asset markets and decisive action by a number of central banks across the globe, we are treading a path that looks like the bull case scenario presented our January 2020 outlooks. That scenario would see gold prices head over US$2000/oz by the end of the year. In that scenario, the Federal Reserve of the US embarks on policy easing (which has already started), that drives Treasury yields lower than where they were in December 2019 (Treasury yields have already broken new all-time lows of 0.35% on March 10th 2020). Inflation in that scenario is at an elevated 2.5% (which is in line with the January 2020 actual reading). Lastly, speculative positioning in gold futures markets remains elevated throughout the course of the year (at 350k contracts net long). In February 2020, we saw speculative positioning hit fresh highs (388k) and at the time of writing (10th March 2020), it remains above the 350k. We caution that if the current shock we are experiencing is temporary, we could get the recent interest rate cuts reversed, Treasury yields could rise to 2% and positing in gold futures could head back to more normal levels (closer to 120k). That was what we presented as a base case in January, where gold would end the year at US$1640/oz. So the downside from the levels ate the time of writing is somewhat limited (with gold trading at US$1650/oz at the time of writing) even if we end up in what was the base case.
This concludes our 6 weeks grand tour of the “natural” defensive assets among the main 4 asset classes. Next week we will start focusing on portfolio construction and on different ideas to design defensive and versatile portfolios.
Europe Equities is proxied by the STOXX Europe 600 net total return index. Broad Commodities (Commo) is proxied by the Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index. Enhanced Commodities is proxied by Optimized Roll Commodity Total Return Index. Energy is proxied by the Bloomberg Energy subindex Total Return Index. Precious Metals is proxied by the Bloomberg Precious Metals subindex Total Return Index. Industrial Metals is proxied by the Bloomberg Industrial Metals subindex Total Return Index. Livestock is proxied by the Bloomberg Livestock subindex Total Return Index. Softs is proxied by the Bloomberg Softs subindex Total Return Index. Grains is proxied by the Bloomberg Grains subindex Total Return Index. Gold is proxied by the LBMA Gold Price PM Index. Silver is proxied by the LBMA Silver Price index.
By: Pierre Debru, Director, Research
Source
1 WisdomTree, Bloomberg. In EUR.
2 WisdomTree, Bloomberg. In EUR. Europe Equities is proxied by the STOXX Europe 600 net total return index. Min Vol is proxied by MSCI World Min Volatility net total return index. Cash Euro is proxied by a series of daily compounded Eonia. EUR Treasury AAA is proxied by the Bloomberg Barclays EUR Aggregate Treasury AAA total return index. USD Treasury is proxied by the Bloomberg Barclays USD Treasury total return index.
After a positive start to the week, crude oil prices rose on Monday and Tuesday, with Brent peaking at USD 66.8 per barrel on Tuesday evening. Since then, prices have drifted lower, declining by roughly 5% to around USD 63.5 per barrel – below where the week began during Monday’s opening.
Iran is currently in the spotlight, having signaled its willingness to sign a nuclear deal with the U.S. in exchange for lifting economic sanctions. Ali Shamkhani, a senior political, military, and nuclear adviser, spoke publicly about the ongoing negotiations. He indicated that Iran would commit to never developing nuclear weapons and could dismantle its stockpile of highly enriched uranium – provided there is immediate sanctions relief. While nothing is finalized, the rhetoric is notable and could theoretically lead to additional Iranian barrels entering the global market.
It’s worth recalling that in mid-March, Iran’s Oil Minister declared that the country’s oil exports were “unstoppable”, and that Iran would not relinquish its share of the global oil market – even in the face of new U.S. sanctions introduced earlier this year. In practice, however, this claim has proven exaggerated.
In February 2025, Iran’s crude production rose to 3.3 million barrels per day (bpd), staying above 3 million bpd since September 2023. Of this, approximately 1.74 million bpd were exported – primarily to Chinese private refiners (”teapots”). Early in the year, shipments to these teapots continued largely uninterrupted, as they have limited exposure to the U.S. financial system and remained willing buyers despite sanctions.
However, Washington’s “maximum pressure” campaign has gradually constrained Iran’s ability to ship crude to China. By March 2025, Chinese imports of Iranian oil peaked at approximately 1.8 million bpd. In April, imports dropped sharply to around 1.3 million bpd, reflecting stricter U.S. sanctions targeting Chinese refineries and port operators involved in handling Iranian crude. Preliminary data for May suggest a further decline, with Iranian oil arrivals potentially falling to 1.0–1.2 million bpd, as Chinese refiners adopt a more cautious stance.
As a result, any immediate sanctions relief stemming from a nuclear agreement could unlock an additional 0.8 million bpd of Iranian crude for the global market – an undeniably bearish development for prices.
On the other hand, failure to reach a deal would likely mean continued or even intensified U.S. pressure under the Trump administration. In a worst-case scenario – where Iran loses its remaining 1.0–1.2 million bpd of exports – and if Saudi Arabia or other major producers do not promptly step in to offset the shortfall, global oil prices could experience an immediate upside of USD 4–6 per barrel.
Meanwhile, both OPEC and the IEA expect the oil market to remain well-supplied in 2025, with supply growth exceeding demand. OPEC holds its demand growth forecast at 1.3 million bpd, driven mainly by emerging markets in Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America. In contrast, the IEA sees more modest growth of 740,000 bpd, citing macroeconomic challenges and accelerating electric vehicle adoption – particularly in China, where petrochemical demand is now the primary growth engine.
On the supply side, OPEC has revised down its non-OPEC+ growth estimate to 800,000 bpd, citing weaker prices and reduced upstream investment. The IEA, however, expects global supply to expand by 1.6 million bpd, led by the U.S., Canada, Brazil, Guyana, and Argentina. Should OPEC+ proceed with unwinding voluntary cuts, the IEA warns that the market could face a surplus of up to 1.4 million bpd in 2025 – potentially exerting renewed downward pressure on prices.
_______________
EIA data released yesterday showed U.S. Crude inventories unexpectedly rose 3.45 million barrels with a drop in exports and despite a larger than expected increase in refinery runs.
U.S. commercial crude oil inventories (excl. SPR) rose by 3.45 million barrels last week, reaching 441.8 million barrels – approximately 6% below the five-year seasonal average. Total gasoline inventories declined by 1 million barrels and now sit around 3% below the five-year average. Distillate (diesel) fuel inventories fell by 3.2 million barrels and remain roughly 16% below the seasonal norm. Meanwhile, propane/propylene inventories climbed by 2.2 million barrels but are still 9% below their five-year average. Overall, total commercial petroleum inventories rose by 4.9 million barrels over the week – overall a neutral report with limited immediate price impacts.
After a sharp selloff in late April and early May, Brent crude prices bottomed out at USD 58.5 per barrel on Monday, May 5th – the lowest level since April 9th. This was a natural reaction to higher-than-expected OPEC+ supply for both May and June.
Over the past week, however, oil prices have rebounded strongly, climbing by USD 7.9 per barrel on a week-over-week basis. Brent peaked at USD 66.4 per barrel yesterday afternoon before sliding slightly to USD 65 per barrel this morning.
Markets across the board saw significant moves yesterday after the U.S. and China agreed to temporarily lower tariffs and ease export restrictions for 90 days. Scott Bessent announced, the U.S. will lower its tariffs on Chinese goods to 30%, while China will reduce its tariffs on U.S. goods to 10%. While this is a temporary measure, the intent to reach a longer-term agreement is clearly gaining momentum. That said, the U.S. administration has layered tariffs extensively, making the exact average rate hard to pin down – estimates suggest it now sits around 20%.
In short, the macroeconomic outlook improved swiftly: equities rallied, long-term interest rates climbed, gold prices declined, and the USD strengthened. By yesterday’s close, the S&P 500 rose 3.3% and the Nasdaq jumped 4.4%, essentially recovering the losses sustained since April 2nd.
That said, some form of positive news was expected from the weekend meeting, and now oil markets appear to be pausing after three days of strong gains. Attention is shifting from U.S.-China trade de-escalation back toward market fundamentals and geopolitical developments in the Middle East.
On the supply side, the market is pricing in relaxed restrictions on Iranian crude exports after President Trump signaled progress in nuclear negotiations over the weekend. Further talks are expected within the next week.
Meanwhile, President Trump is visiting Saudi Arabia today – the key OPEC+ player – which has ramped up production to discipline non-compliant members by pressuring oil prices. This aligns well with U.S. interests, especially with the administration pushing for lower crude and refined product prices for its US domestic voters.
With Brent hovering around USD 65, it’s unlikely that oil prices will dominate the agenda during the Saudi visit. Instead, discussions are expected to focus on broader geopolitical issues in the Middle East.
Looking ahead, OPEC+ is expected to continue with its monthly meetings and market assessments. The group appears focused on navigating internal disputes and responding to shifts in global demand. Importantly, the recent increase in output doesn’t suggest an oversupplied market here and now – seasonal demand in the region also rises during the summer months, absorbing some of the additional barrels.
Strong rebound yesterday with further gains today. Brent crude rallied 3.2% with a close of USD 62.15/b yesterday and a high of the day of USD 62.8/b. This morning it is gaining another 0.9% to USD 62.7/b with signs that US and China may move towards trade talks.
Brent went lower on 9 April than on Monday. Looking back at the latest trough on Monday it traded to an intraday low of USD 58.5/b. In comparison it traded to an intraday low of USD 58.4/b on 9 April. While markets were in shock following 2 April (’Liberation Day’) one should think that the announcement from OPEC+ this weekend of a production increase of some 400 kb/d also in June would have chilled the oil market even more. But no.
’ Technically overbought’ may be the explanation. ’Technically overbought’ has been the main explanation for the rebound since Monday. Maybe so. But the fact that it went lower on 9 April than on Monday this week must imply that markets aren’t totally clear over what OPEC+ is currently doing and is planning to do. Is it the start of a flood or a brief period where disorderly members need to be whipped into line?
The official message is that this is punishment versus quota cheaters Iraq, UAE and Kazakhstan. Makes a lot of sense since it is hard to play as a team if the team strategy is not followed by all players. If the May and June hikes is punishment to force the cheaters into line, then there is very real possibility that they actually will fall in line. And voila. The May and June 4x jumps is what we got and then we are back to increases of 137 kb/d per month. Or we could even see a period with no increase at all or even reversals and cuts.
OPEC+ has after all not officially abandoned cooperation. It has not abandoned quotas. It is still an overall orderly agenda and message to the market. This isn’t like 2014/15 with ’no quotas’. Or like full throttle in spring 2020. The latter was resolved very quickly along with producer pain from very low prices. It is quite clear that Saudi Arabia was very angry with the quota cheaters when the production for May was discussed at the end of March. And that led to the 4x hike in May. And the same again this weekend as quota offenders couldn’t prove good behavior in April. But if the offenders now prove good behavior in May, then the message for July production could prove a very different message than the 4x for May and June.
Trade talk hopes, declining US crude stocks, backwardated Brent curve and shale oil pain lifts price. If so, then we are left with the risk for a US tariff war induced global recession. And with some glimmers of hope now that US and China will start to talk trade, we see Brent crude lifting higher today. Add in that US crude stocks indicatively fell 4.5 mb last week (actual data later today), that the Brent crude forward curve is still in front-end backwardation (no surplus quite yet) and that US shale oil production is starting to show signs of pain with cuts to capex spending and lowering of production estimates.
Oil slips as Iran signals sanctions breakthrough
Rebound to $65: trade tensions ease, comeback in fundamentals
Stark affär för Pan American – men MAG Silvers aktieägare kan bli förlorare
Anton Löf kommenterar industrimetaller, tillståndsprocesser och svenska gruvor
Nystart för koppargruvan Viscaria i Kiruna – en av Europas största
Crude oil comment: The forward curve is pricing tightness today and surplus tomorrow
Ingenting stoppar guldets uppgång, nu 3400 USD per uns
Samtal om läget för guld, kobolt och sällsynta jordartsmetaller
Agnico Eagle siktar på toppen – två av världens största guldgruvor i sikte
Lägre elpriser och många minustimmar fram till midsommar
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: The forward curve is pricing tightness today and surplus tomorrow
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanIngenting stoppar guldets uppgång, nu 3400 USD per uns
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedanSamtal om läget för guld, kobolt och sällsynta jordartsmetaller
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedanAgnico Eagle siktar på toppen – två av världens största guldgruvor i sikte
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedanLägre elpriser och många minustimmar fram till midsommar
-
Analys2 veckor sedan
June OPEC+ quota: Another triple increase or sticking to plan with +137 kb/d increase?
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedanSaudiarabien informerar att man är ok med ett lägre oljepris
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedanUtbudsunderskott och stigande industriell efterfrågan av silver på marknaden