Följ oss

Analys

SHB Råvarukommentar 19 februari 2016

Publicerat

den

Handelsbanken - Råvarubrevet - Nyhetsbrev om råvaror

Kvartalsrapport för råvaror från HandelsbankenOLJA

Brentoljan ser ut att sluta veckan i princip oförändrad, vilket dock döljer stor volatilitet i spåren av avtalet om att frysa produktionen. En uppgörelse mellan Saudiarabien, Ryssland, Venezuela och Qatar fick priset att stiga med 7% i onsdags. Vi bedömer att den prisuppgång som skett är en riskpremie för att Iran eller Irak ansluter sig. Saudiarabien fryser sin produktion på rekordnivåer men kungadömet konsumerar säsongsmässigt mer olja för kylbehov under sommaren och därmed finns det en risk att exporten blir något mindre under sommarmånaderna med avtalet på plats. Det kan dock komma att kompenseras av lägre konsumtion i spåren av budgetunderskott och senaste nedskärningarna på subventioner i el, vatten och petroleum.

Även Ryssland fryser på rekordnivåer men Ryssland har inte förutsättningar att öka produktionen under sanktionerna. Bibehållen produktion vore en positiv överraskning. Med budgetunderskott tror vi att fallande produktion ändå kan leda till stigande export, till priset av minskad inhemsk konsumtion.Qatar har relativt liten oljeproduktion, men är världens största exportör av naturgas som prisas mot olja. Qatar vill därför alltid medverka i prisstärkande aktiviteter på olja då inkomstbortfallet kompenseras flerfaldigat i högre pris på naturgasexporten. För Iran är det otänkbart att frysa produktionen då landet har ambitioner att återta sin förlorade marknad under sanktionerna men självklart kommer landet uttala sig positivt till att andra fryser.

Irak har relativt stora planer på att expandera produktionen i år. Projekten är redan upphandlade och under utbyggnad vilket gör att de inte går att avbryta. Att minska befintlig produktion samtidigt som man bygger ut ny verkar inte rimligt. Irak har också varit undantaget OPEC:s produktionskvot, när den fanns, för att kunna återuppbygga produktionen efter USA invasionen 2003.

Sammantaget tycker vi inte att avtalet har någon större innebörd och ser en risk att riskpremien från att Iran eller Irak ska ansluta sig till avtalet pyser ut nästa vecka. En viss riskpremie ser vi dock som motiverad av att Ryssland faktiskt slutit avtal med OPEC.

EL

Elpriset som fallit kraftigt under inledningen av året, -17 procent för Q216, vände denna vecka upp med närmare 2 euro till 16.50. Kallare väderutsikter framöver i kombination med stigande pris på tysk baskraft samt fossila bränslen är det som främst drivit uppgången. Även om de fossila bränslena fått stöd av den lite bredare uppgången befinner sig dock både kolet och gasen i en stark nedåtgående trend, kol har fallit 68% sedan toppen 2011 och gaspriset har nästan halverats. Svårt att se att någon av dessa faktorer kan generera någon större uppgång och inte heller från den hydrologiska balansen som visar på närmare 10 TWh överskott, men med stöd från en del ”bargain hunting” kan elpriset stiga ytterligare någon från dessa förhållandevis låga nivåer.

Guld

Guldpriset har fallit något under veckan när börsen rusat men har fortfarande stigit över 15% under 2016. Amerikanska centralbanken har tagit notis om senaste marknadsoron och marknaden har nu helt tappat tron på fler räntehöjningar det här året. Ytterligare räntehöjningar från Fed kan bromsa en uppgång för guldpriset, så en mindre hökaktig amerikansk centralbank är positivt.

Vi är fortsatt positiva på guld i den finansiellt oroliga miljö vi har, och guldet har i år stigit på egna meriter, inte enbart på en dollarförsvagning.

Basmetaller

Basmetaller har stigit över veckan, främst nickel som är upp med 7%. Huvudsakligen drivit av en omvändning i sentimentet kring råvaror men också förhoppningar om mer stimulanser i Kina efter svag makrodata.

Teknisk analys: Zink

Zink började året med en större uppgång från 1450-nivån. Den första uppgångsfasen ser ut att vara avslutad vid 1767, varefter zink har rekylerat. Rekylen stannade vid 38% rekyl av uppgången, en relativt vanlig fibonaccinivå. Detta skulle kunna innebära att rekylen ner är färdig och att zink kan vara på gång att göra en ny uppgångsfas. Ett vanligt samband för uppgångarna är att vi får en lika lång upprörelse som vi redan sett, vilket i det här fallet skulle innebära ett möjligt mål runt 1960 USD per ton.

Ett möjligt problem med detta scenario är att den första rekylen på en uppgång ofta är mer än 38%, det är vanligare med 50% eller 62% rekyl. Detta skulle kunna innebära att idén att zink har mer uppsidepotential är korrekt, men att rekylen ner på den första uppgången inte är färdig. Dock var många av rekylerna uppåt i zinks tidigare nedgång också av ganska beskedlig magnitud, vilket skulle kunna vara ett argument för att det kanske räcker med den rekyl vi har sett.

Utifrån ett tekniskt perspektiv anser vi zink köpvärd kring dagens nivå vid 1640 USD per ton, med en stopploss under den senaste botten vid 1640 USD med ett mål runt 1960 USD om uppgångsscenariot är korrekt.

LME Zink, 4 timmarsgraf

Teknisk analys på zink-priset (LME)

[box]SHB Råvarukommentar är producerat av Handelsbanken och publiceras i samarbete och med tillstånd på Råvarumarknaden.se[/box]

Ansvarsbegränsning

Detta material är producerat av Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ) i fortsättningen kallad Handelsbanken. De som arbetar med innehållet är inte analytiker och materialet är inte oberoende investeringsanalys. Innehållet är uteslutande avsett för kunder i Sverige. Syftet är att ge en allmän information till Handelsbankens kunder och utgör inte ett personligt investeringsråd eller en personlig rekommendation. Informationen ska inte ensamt utgöra underlag för investeringsbeslut. Kunder bör inhämta råd från sina rådgivare och basera sina investeringsbeslut utifrån egen erfarenhet.

Informationen i materialet kan ändras och också avvika från de åsikter som uttrycks i oberoende investeringsanalyser från Handelsbanken. Informationen grundar sig på allmänt tillgänglig information och är hämtad från källor som bedöms som tillförlitliga, men riktigheten kan inte garanteras och informationen kan vara ofullständig eller nedkortad. Ingen del av förslaget får reproduceras eller distribueras till någon annan person utan att Handelsbanken dessförinnan lämnat sitt skriftliga medgivande. Handelsbanken ansvarar inte för att materialet används på ett sätt som strider mot förbudet mot vidarebefordran eller offentliggörs i strid med bankens regler.

Fortsätt läsa
Annons
Klicka för att kommentera

Skriv ett svar

Din e-postadress kommer inte publiceras. Obligatoriska fält är märkta *

Analys

Diesel concerns drags Brent lower but OPEC+ will still get the price it wants in Q3

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent rallied 2.5% last week on bullish inventories and bullish backdrop. Brent crude gained 2.5% last week with a close of the week of USD 89.5/b which also was the highest close of the week. The bullish drivers were: 1) Commercial crude and product stocks declined 3.8 m b versus a normal seasonal rise of 4.4 m b, 2) Solid gains in front-end Brent crude time-spreads indicating a tight crude market, and 3) A positive backdrop of a 2.7% gain in US S&P 500 index.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Brent falling back 1% on diesel concerns this morning. But positive backdrop may counter it later. This morning Brent crude is pulling back 0.9% to USD 88.7/b counter to the fact that the general backdrop is positive with a weaker USD, equity gains both in Asia and in European and US futures and not the least also positive gains in industrial metals with copper trading up 0.4% at USD 10 009/ton. This overall positive market backdrop clearly has the potential to reverse the initial bearish start of the week as we get a little further into the Monday trading session.

Diesel concerns at center stage. The bearish angle on oil this morning is weak diesel demand with diesel forward curves in front-end contango and predictions for lower refinery runs in response this down the road. I.e. that the current front-end strength in crude curves (elevated backwardation) reflecting a current tight crude market will dissipate in not too long due to likely lower refinery runs. 

But gasoline cracks have rallied. Diesel weakness is normal this time of year. Overall refining margin still strong. Lots of focus on weakness in diesel demand and cracks. But we need to remember that we saw the same weakness last spring in April and May before the diesel cracks rallied into the rest of the year. Diesel cracks are also very seasonal with natural winter-strength and likewise natural summer weakness. What matters for refineries is of course the overall refining margin reflecting demand for all products. Gasoline cracks have rallied to close to USD 24/b in ARA for the front-month contract. If we compute a proxy ARA refining margin consisting of 40% diesel, 40% gasoline and 20% bunkeroil we get a refining margin of USD 14/b which is way above the 2015-19 average of only USD 6.5/b. This does not take into account the now much higher costs to EU refineries of carbon prices and nat gas prices. So the picture is a little less rosy than what the USD 14/b may look like.

The Russia/Ukraine oil product shock has not yet fully dissipated. What stands out though is that the oil product shock from the Russian war on Ukraine has dissipated significantly, but it is still clearly there. Looking at below graphs on oil product cracks the Russian attack on Ukraine stands out like day and night in February 2022 and oil product markets have still not fully normalized.

Oil market gazing towards OPEC+ meeting in June. OPEC+ will adjust to get the price they want. Oil markets are increasingly gazing towards the OPEC+ meeting in June when the group will decide what to do with production in Q3-24. Our view is that the group will adjust production as needed to gain the oil price it wants which typically is USD 85/b or higher. This is probably also the general view in the market.

Change in US oil inventories was a bullish driver last week.

Change in US oil inventories was a bullish driver last week.
Source: SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data, US EIA

Crude oil time-spreads strengthened last week

Crude oil time-spreads strengthened last week
Source:  SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data

ICE gasoil forward curve has shifted from solid backwardation to front-end contango signaling diesel demand weakness. Leading to concerns for lower refinery runs and softer crude oil demand by refineries down the road.

ICE gasoil forward curve
Source: Blbrg

ARA gasoline crack has rallied towards while Gasoil crack has fallen back. Not a totally unusual pattern.

ARA gasoline crack has rallied towards while Gasoil crack has fallen back. Not a totally unusual pattern.
Source:  SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data

Proxy ARA refining margin with 40% gasoil crack, 40% gasoline crack and 20% bunker oil crack.

Proxy ARA refining margin with 40% gasoil crack, 40% gasoline crack and 20% bunker oil crack.
Source:  SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data

ARA diesel cracks saw the exact same pattern last year. Dipping low in April and May before rallying into the second half of the year. Diesel cracks have fallen back but are still clearly above normal levels both in spot and on the forward curve. I.e. the ”Russian diesel stress” hasn’t fully dissipated quite yet.

ARA diesel cracks
Source:  SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data

Net long specs fell back a little last week.

Net long specs fell back a little last week.
Source:  SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data

52-week ranking of net long speculative positions in Brent and WTI as well as 52-week ranking of the strength of the Brent 1-7 mth backwardation

52-week ranking of net long speculative positions in Brent and WTI as well as 52-week ranking of the strength of the Brent 1-7 mth backwardation
Source:  SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

’wait and see’ mode

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

So far this week, Brent Crude prices have strengthened by USD 1.3 per barrel since Monday’s opening. While macroeconomic concerns persist, they have somewhat abated, resulting in muted price reactions. Fundamentals predominantly influence global oil price developments at present. This week, we’ve observed highs of USD 89 per barrel yesterday morning and lows of USD 85.7 per barrel on Monday morning. Currently, Brent Crude is trading at a stable USD 88.3 per barrel, maintaining this level for the past 24 hours.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

Additionally, there has been no significant price reaction to Crude following yesterday’s US inventory report (see page 11 attached):

  • US commercial crude inventories (excluding SPR) decreased by 6.4 million barrels from the previous week, standing at 453.6 million barrels, roughly 3% below the five-year average for this time of year.
  • Total motor gasoline inventories decreased by 0.6 million barrels, approximately 4% below the five-year average.
  • Distillate (diesel) inventories increased by 1.6 million barrels but remain weak historically, about 7% below the five-year average.
  • Total commercial petroleum inventories (crude + products) decreased by 3.8 million barrels last week.

Regarding petroleum products, the overall build/withdrawal aligns with seasonal patterns, theoretically exerting limited effect on prices. However, the significant draw in commercial crude inventories counters the seasonality, surpassing market expectations and API figures released on Tuesday, indicating a draw of 3.2 million barrels (compared to Bloomberg consensus of +1.3 million). API numbers for products were more in line with the US DOE.

Against this backdrop, yesterday’s inventory report is bullish, theoretically exerting upward pressure on crude prices.

Yet, the current stability in prices may be attributed to reduced geopolitical risks, balanced against demand concerns. Markets are adopting a wait-and-see approach ahead of Q1 US GDP (today at 14:30) and the Fed’s preferred inflation measure, “core PCE prices” (tomorrow at 14:30). A stronger print could potentially dampen crude prices as market participants worry over the demand outlook.

Geopolitical “risk premiums” have decreased from last week, although concerns persist, highlighted by Ukraine’s strikes on two Russian oil depots in western Russia and Houthis’ claims of targeting shipping off the Yemeni coast yesterday.

With a relatively calmer geopolitical landscape, the market carefully evaluates data and fundamentals. While the supply picture appears clear, demand remains the predominant uncertainty that the market attempts to decode.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Also OPEC+ wants to get compensation for inflation

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent crude has fallen USD 3/b since the peak of Iran-Israel concerns last week. Still lots of talk about significant Mid-East risk premium in the current oil price. But OPEC+ is in no way anywhere close to loosing control of the oil market. Thus what will really matter is what OPEC+ decides to do in June with respect to production in Q3-24 and the market knows this very well. Saudi Arabia’s social cost-break-even is estimated at USD 100/b today. Also Saudi Arabia’s purse is hurt by 21% US inflation since Jan 2020. Saudi needs more money to make ends meet. Why shouldn’t they get a higher nominal pay as everyone else. Saudi will ask for it

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Brent is down USD 3/b vs. last week as the immediate risk for Iran-Israel has faded. But risk is far from over says experts. The Brent crude oil price has fallen 3% to now USD 87.3/b since it became clear that Israel was willing to restrain itself with only a muted counter attack versus Israel while Iran at the same time totally played down the counterattack by Israel. The hope now is of course that that was the end of it. The real fear has now receded for the scenario where Israeli and Iranian exchanges of rockets and drones would escalate to a point where also the US is dragged into it with Mid East oil supply being hurt in the end. Not everyone are as optimistic. Professor Meir Javedanfar who teaches Iranian-Israeli studies in Israel instead judges that ”this is just the beginning” and that they sooner or later will confront each other again according to NYT. While the the tension between Iran and Israel has faded significantly, the pain and anger spiraling out of destruction of Gaza will however close to guarantee that bombs and military strifes will take place left, right and center in the Middle East going forward.

Also OPEC+ wants to get paid. At the start of 2020 the 20 year inflation adjusted average Brent crude price stood at USD 76.6/b. If we keep the averaging period fixed and move forward till today that inflation adjusted average has risen to USD 92.5/b. So when OPEC looks in its purse and income stream it today needs a 21% higher oil price than in January 2020 in order to make ends meet and OPEC(+) is working hard to get it.

Much talk about Mid-East risk premium of USD 5-10-25/b. But OPEC+ is in control so why does it matter. There is much talk these days that there is a significant risk premium in Brent crude these days and that it could evaporate if the erratic state of the Middle East as well as Ukraine/Russia settles down. With the latest gains in US oil inventories one could maybe argue that there is a USD 5/b risk premium versus total US commercial crude and product inventories in the Brent crude oil price today. But what really matters for the oil price is what OPEC+ decides to do in June with respect to Q3-24 production. We are in no doubt that the group will steer this market to where they want it also in Q3-24. If there is a little bit too much oil in the market versus demand then they will trim supply accordingly.

Also OPEC+ wants to make ends meet. The 20-year real average Brent price from 2000 to 2019 stood at USD 76.6/b in Jan 2020. That same averaging period is today at USD 92.5/b in today’s money value. OPEC+ needs a higher nominal price to make ends meet and they will work hard to get it.

Price of brent crude
Source: SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data

Inflation adjusted Brent crude price versus total US commercial crude and product stocks. A bit above the regression line. Maybe USD 5/b risk premium. But type of inventories matter. Latest big gains were in Propane and Other oils and not so much in crude and products

Inflation adjusted Brent crude price versus total US commercial crude and product stocks.
Source:  SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data

Total US commercial crude and product stocks usually rise by 4-5 m b per week this time of year. Gains have been very strong lately, but mostly in Propane and Other oils

Total US commercial crude and product stocks usually rise by 4-5 m b per week this time of year. Gains have been very strong lately, but mostly in Propane and Other oils
Source:  SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data

Last week’s US inventory data. Big rise of 10 m b in commercial inventories. What really stands out is the big gains in Propane and Other oils

US inventory data
Source:  SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data

Take actual changes minus normal seasonal changes we find that US commercial crude and regular products like diesel, gasoline, jet and bunker oil actually fell 3 m b versus normal change. 

Take actual changes minus normal seasonal changes we find that US commercial crude and regular products like diesel, gasoline, jet and bunker oil actually fell 3 m b versus normal change.
Source:  SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data
Fortsätt läsa

Populära