Analys

Orange juice: Declining supply meets weak demand

Publicerat

11 år sedan

den

26 augusti, 2014

In oranges and orange juice, the outlook for both supply and demand is dim. Especially in the US, a declining supply will meet with softening demand. Supply concerns were in focus for months, causing prices to rise. But disappointing US consumption data and a lack of strong storms in the south of the US turned the price movement around in the summer. Prices were able to regain ground recently as estimates see Florida’s harvest as from October at a 50-year low and California is supposed to harvest fewer oranges as well. The price for frozen concentrated orange juice, which strongly depends on the US market, will probably continue to fluctuate for a long while, driven by declining supply and similarly declining demand.

Prices for frozen concentrated orange juice on the New York exchange have not been able to sustain their month-long uptrend that was intact until June. Instead, they dropped by more than 15% between the middle of June and the first days of August. Only at the current margin could the quotations regain some ground, rising from 139 US cents to nearly 150 US cents per pound. Though the two-year high of mid-June at 167 US cents per pound is still some ways away (chart 1).

The focus was therefore very much on the supply side. The month-long price rise until June had been triggered by prospects of a lower US supply. In fact, the last harvest in the US was already unsatisfactory. In its July report the USDA once more reduced its estimate for the 2013/14 US harvest compared to its last forecast from January. It now envisages only 6.3 million tons of oranges, 16% less than in 2012/13 (chart 2). This is the second large consecutive decline. The plant disease citrus greening, which causes the fruit to drop prematurely, still maintains its grip on large parts of the growing regions. As a result of the lower harvest, US orange juice production should come in at 481,000 tons, 20% below 2012/13 levels, which were already lower than in the previous year.

Moreover, the drought in Brazil spurred doubts as to whether rising production in Brazil would be able to compensate for the decline in the US. For Brazil, the USDA had predicted in January that the 2013/14 orange harvest would increase by 8.5%, but this forecast was cut to 6% in July. This still remarkable rise is largely attributable to high yields. The quantity of oranges used for processing is seen to rise at a similarly strong rate. As a result, Brazil’s orange juice production, which had fallen massively by almost a quarter in 2012/13, is now expected to post a 12% increase.

Unlike global orange production itself, where growth not only in Brazil but also in China will probably more than offset the decline in the US, global orange juice production should stagnate in 2013/14 in the best case according to the USDA. Juice production had already declined in the two preceding years.

However, not only juice production but also the consumption of orange juice is lacking momentum. Global consumption has for years been fluctuating around the mark of 2 million tons (chart 3). Consumption is clearly declining in the US – the most important market alongside the EU. US per-capita consumption of orange juice has reportedly fallen from 46 litres ten years ago to only 35 litres in 2013. According to latest data, US retailers sold 9% less orange juice than one year before in the four weeks ending on 2 August 2014. A wide range of other juices and new developments in other beverages are now competing with orange juice. Also, many consumers prefer beverages with lower sugar content or lower prices. In other developed countries, too, the market for orange juice should be largely saturated. Double-digit growth rates in some other countries, such as China, for instance, cannot reverse this outlook, given the low absolute figures.

But the market is now looking less at the current year 2013/14 than at the coming season. The year 2014/2015 as measured by the USDA begins in October or November in countries in the northern hemisphere. In Brazil, by far the most important country in the southern hemisphere, it even only starts in July 2015. The first USDA forecasts are only expected for autumn. In the US, the orange harvest for 2014/15 should thus get underway in a few weeks. Prospects are far from promising. Estimates are circulating according to which Florida’s orange production, which normally accounts for about 70% of total US production, could fall to less than 90 million boxes of 90 pounds (or 40.8 kilograms) each. This would be less than 3.7 million tons, i.e. the lowest level since 1965. Since according to latest USDA data, Florida harvested 133.6 million boxes in 2012/13 and 104.4 million boxes in 2013/14, this would be a fall by about another 15% compared with the already weak current year. Not all watchers anticipate such a dramatic situation. But there is broad agreement that the harvest will likely remain below 100 million boxes. In California, the only other important growing state in the US, the drought will presumably leave its mark. The situation there has been difficult since 2012 and has become further exacerbated in recent weeks, and more than half of the acreage currently falls in the highest category of “exceptional drought”. The critical outlook for US production has recently given prices a bit of a lift.

It remains to be seen whether in the present situation of weak demand the continuing decline in supply can contribute to noticeable price rises on a lasting basis. We only expect this to happen if supply shortfalls attributable to storms or diseases turn out even larger than currently expected. Fears of a marked hurricane season have driven up prices often already. This year has been relatively calm so far, but the hurricane season only ends in November. Hence, stormrelated crop losses in Florida are still a possibility.

Relaterade ämnen:commerzbank research orange juice

Nästa

Handelsbanken Jordbruk, 28 augusti 2014

Missa inte

Six consecutive weeks of flows into long gold and oil ETPs

Fortsätt läsa

Annons

Analys

Quadruple whammy! Brent crude down $13 in four days

Publicerat

3 dagar sedan

den

7 april, 2025

Redaktionen

Brent Crude prices continued their decline heading into the weekend. On Friday, the price fell another USD 4 per barrel, followed by a further USD 3 per barrel drop this morning. This means Brent crude oil prices have crashed by a whopping USD 13 per barrel (-21%) since last Wednesday high, marking a significant decline in just four trading days. As of now, Brent crude is trading at USD 62.8 per barrel, its lowest point since February 2021.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

The market has faced a ”quadruple whammy”:

#1: U.S. Tariffs: On Wednesday, the U.S. unveiled its new package of individual tariffs. The market reacted swiftly, as Trump followed through on his promise to rebalance the U.S. trade position with the world. His primary objective is a more balanced trade environment, which, naturally, weakened Brent crude prices. The widespread imposition of strict tariffs is likely to fuel concerns about an economic slowdown, which would weaken global oil demand. This macroeconomic uncertainty, especially regarding tariffs, calls for caution about the pace of demand growth.

#2: OPEC+ hike: Shortly after, OPEC+ announced plans to raise production in May by 41,000 bpd, exceeding earlier expectations with a three-monthly increment. OPEC emphasized that strong market fundamentals and a positive outlook were behind the decision. However, the decision likely stemmed from frustration within the cartel, particularly after months of excess production from Kazakhstan and Iraq. Saudi Arabia’s Energy Minister seemed to have reached his limit, emphasizing that the larger-than-expected May output hike would only be a “prelude” if those countries didn’t improve their performance. From Saudi Arabia’s perspective, this signals: ”All comply, or we will drag down the price.”

#3: China’s retaliation: Last Friday, even though the Chinese market was closed, firm indications came from China on how it plans to handle the U.S. tariffs. China is clearly meeting force with force, imposing 34% tariffs on all U.S. goods. This move raises fears of an economic slowdown due to reduced global trade, which would consequently weaken global oil demand going forward.

#4: Saudi price cuts: At the start of this week, oil prices continued to drop after Saudi Arabia slashed its flagship crude price by the most in over two years. Saudi Arabia reduced the Arab Light OSP by USD 2.3 per barrel for Asia in May, while prices to Europe and the U.S. were also cut.

These four key factors have driven the massive price drop over the last four trading days. The overarching theme is the fear of weaker demand and stronger supply. The escalating trade war has raised concerns about a potential global recession, leading to weaker demand, compounded by the surprisingly large output hike from OPEC+.

That said, it’s worth questioning whether the market is underestimating the risk of a U.S.-Iran conflict this year.

U.S. military mobilization and Iran’s resistance to diplomacy have raised the risk of conflict. Efforts to neutralize the Houthis suggest a buildup toward potential strikes on Iran. The recent Liberation Day episode further underscores that economic fallout is not a constraint for Trump, and markets may be underestimating the threat of war in the Middle East.

With this backdrop, we continue to forecast USD 70 per barrel for this year (2025). For reference, Brent crude averaged USD 75 per barrel in Q1-2025.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Lowest since Dec 2021. Kazakhstan likely reason for OPEC+ surprise hike in May

Publicerat

6 dagar sedan

den

4 april, 2025

Redaktionen

Collapsing after Trump tariffs and large surprise production hike by OPEC+ in May. Brent crude collapsed yesterday following the shock of the Trump tariffs on April 2 and even more so due to the unexpected announcement from OPEC+ that they will lift production by 411 kb/d in May which is three times as much as expected. Brent fell 6.4% yesterday with a close of USD 70.14/b and traded to a low of USD 69.48/b within the day. This morning it is down another 2.7% to USD 68.2/b. That is below the recent low point in early March of USD 68.33/b. Thus, a new ”lowest since December 2021” today.

Kazakhstan seems to be the problem and the reason for the unexpected large hike by OPEC+ in May. Kazakhstan has consistently breached its production cap. In February it produced 1.83 mb/d crude and 2.12 mb/d including condensates. In March its production reached a new record of 2.17 mb/d. Its crude production cap however is 1.468 mb/d. In February it thus exceeded its production cap by 362 kb/d.

Those who comply are getting frustrated with those who don’t. Internal compliance is an important and difficult issue when OPEC+ is holding back production. The problem naturally grows the bigger the cuts are and the longer they last as impatience grows over time. The cuts have been large, and they have lasted for a long time. And now some cracks are appearing. But that does not mean they cannot be mended. And it does not imply either that the group is totally shifting strategy from Price to Volume. It is still a measured approach. Also, by lifting all caps across the voluntary cutters, Kazakhstan becomes less out of compliance. Thus, less cuts by Kazakhstan are needed in order to become compliant.

While not a shift from Price to Volume, the surprise hike in May is clearly a sign of weakness. The struggle over internal compliance has now led to a rupture in strategy and more production in May than what was previously planned and signaled to the market. It is thus natural to assign a higher production path from the group for 2025 than previously assumed. Do however remember how quickly the price war between Russia and Saudi Arabia ended in the spring of 2020.

Higher production by OPEC+ will be partially countered by lower production from Venezuela and Iran. The new sanctions towards Iran and Venezuela can to a large degree counter the production increase from OPEC+. But to what extent is still unclear.

Buy some oil calls. Bullish risks are never far away. Rising risks for US/Israeli attack on Iran? The US has increased its indirect attacks on Iran by fresh attacks on Syria and Yemen lately. The US has also escalated sanctions towards the country in an effort to force Iran into a new nuclear deal. The UK newspaper TheSun yesterday ran the following story: ”ON THE BRINK US & Iran war is ‘INEVITABLE’, France warns as Trump masses huge strike force with THIRD of America’s stealth bombers”. This is indeed a clear risk which would lead to significant losses of supply of oil in the Middle East and probably not just from Iran. So, buying some oil calls amid the current selloff is probably a prudent thing to do for oil consumers.

Brent crude is rejoining the US equity selloff by its recent collapse though for partially different reasons. New painful tariffs from Trump in combination with more oil from OPEC+ is not a great combination.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Tariffs deepen economic concerns – significantly weighing on crude oil prices

Publicerat

7 dagar sedan

den

3 april, 2025

Redaktionen

Brent crude prices initially maintained the gains from late March and traded sideways during the first two trading days in April. Yesterday evening, the price even reached its highest point since mid-February, touching USD 75.5 per barrel.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

However, after the U.S. president addressed the public and unveiled his new package of individual tariffs, the market reacted accordingly. Overnight, Brent crude dropped by close to USD 4 per barrel, now trading at USD 71.6 per barrel.

Key takeaways from the speech include a baseline tariff rate of 10% for all countries. Additionally, individual reciprocal tariffs will be imposed on countries with which the U.S. has the largest trade deficits. Many Asian economies end up at the higher end of the scale, with China facing a significant 54% tariff. In contrast, many North and South American countries are at the lower end, with a 10% tariff rate. The EU stands at 20%, which, while not unexpected given earlier signals, is still disappointing, especially after Trump’s previous suggestion that there might be some easing.

Once again, Trump has followed through on his promise, making it clear that he is serious about rebalancing the U.S. trade position with the world. While some negotiation may still occur, the primary objective is to achieve a more balanced trade environment. A weaker U.S. dollar is likely to be an integral part of this solution.

Yet, as the flow of physical goods to the U.S. declines, the natural question arises: where will these goods go? The EU may be forced to raise tariffs on China, mirroring U.S. actions to protect its industries from an influx of discounted Chinese goods.

Initially, we will observe the effects in soft economic data, such as sentiment indices reflecting investor, industry, and consumer confidence, followed by drops in equity markets and, very likely, declining oil prices. This will eventually be followed by more tangible data showing reductions in employment, spending, investments, and overall economic activity.

Ref oil prices moving forward, we have recently adjusted our Brent crude price forecast. The widespread imposition of strict tariffs is expected to foster fears of an economic slowdown, potentially reducing oil demand. Macroeconomic uncertainty, particularly regarding tariffs, warrants caution regarding the pace of demand growth. Our updated forecast of USD 70 per barrel for 2025 and 2026, and USD 75 per barrel for 2027, reflects a more conservative outlook, influenced by stronger-than-expected U.S. supply, a more politically influenced OPEC+, and an increased focus on fragile demand.

___

US DOE data:

Last week, U.S. crude oil refinery inputs averaged 15.6 million barrels per day, a decrease of 192 thousand barrels per day from the previous week. Refineries operated at 86.0% of their total operable capacity during this period. Gasoline production increased slightly, averaging 9.3 million barrels per day, while distillate (diesel) production also rose, averaging 4.7 million barrels per day.

U.S. crude oil imports averaged 6.5 million barrels per day, up by 271 thousand barrels per day from the prior week. Over the past four weeks, imports averaged 5.9 million barrels per day, reflecting a 6.3% year-on-year decline compared to the same period last year.

The focus remains on U.S. crude and product inventories, which continue to impact short-term price dynamics in both WTI and Brent crude. Total commercial petroleum inventories (excl. SPR) increased by 5.4 million barrels, a modest build, yet insufficient to trigger significant price movements.

Commercial crude oil inventories (excl. SPR) rose by 6.2 million barrels, in line with the 6-million-barrel build forecasted by the API. With this latest increase, U.S. crude oil inventories now stand at 439.8 million barrels, which is 4% below the five-year average for this time of year.

Gasoline inventories decreased by 1.6 million barrels, exactly matching the API’s reported decline of 1.6 million barrels. Diesel inventories rose by 0.3 million barrels, which is close to the API’s forecast of an 11-thousand-barrel decrease. Diesel inventories are currently 6% below the five-year average.

Annons

Over the past four weeks, total products supplied, a proxy for U.S. demand, averaged 20.1 million barrels per day, a 1.2% decrease compared to the same period last year. Gasoline supplied averaged 8.8 million barrels per day, down 1.9% year-on-year. Diesel supplied averaged 3.8 million barrels per day, marking a 3.7% increase from the same period last year. Jet fuel demand also showed strength, rising 4.2% over the same four-week period.