Easing a bit towards the 80-line this morning following recent strong gains. Brent crude gained another 1.3% last week with a close of USD 80.79/b. It reached a high of USD 82.63/b last Wednesday. This morning it is inching down 0.3% to USD 80.5/b.

Donald needs a higher oil price to get another US shale oil production boom. Donald Trump declaring an energy emergency with promises of opening up federal land for oil exploration +++, may sound alarmingly bearish for oil. But the days when US oil production (shale) was booming at an average oil price of USD 58/b (2015-19) are behind us. Brent has averaged USD 81/b through 2023 and 2024, and US shale oil is now moving towards zero growth in 2026.

Donald Trump (and the US oil industry) needs a higher oil price to drive US oil production significantly higher over the next 4 years. The US oil industry also needs to know that there will be a sustainable need for higher US oil production. So, someone else in the oil market needs to exit to make room for more oil from the US. Iran and/or Venezuela will be the likely targets for Donald Trump in that respect. But it is still not obvious that the US oil industry will go for another period of strong oil supply growth with natural doubts over how lasting a possible outage from Iran and/or Venezuela would be.

Strong rise in speculative positions increases the risks for pullbacks below the 80-line. The new sanctions on Russia have pushed crude oil higher over the past weeks, but speculators have also helped to drive flat prices higher as well as driving the front-end of the crude curves into steeper backwardation. Speculators typically buy the front-end of the crude curves and thus tend to bend the forward curves into steeper backwardation whey they buy. So, curve shapes are not fully objective measures of tightness. Net-long speculative positions (Brent +WTI) rose 52.4 mb over the week to last Tuesday. In total they are up 415 mb to 577 mb versus the low point in the autumn of 162 mb in early September.

Brent crude has now technically pulled back from overbought with RSI at 65.2 and back below the 70-line. But washing out some long-specs with Brent trading sub-80 for a little while is probably in the cards still.

But this does not look like just a speculatively driven frothy flash-in-the-pan. But do not forget that time-spreads have been tightening since early December and flat prices have risen higher along with them. Thus, this is not just a speculatively driven frothy flash-in-the-pan. The new sanctions on Russia are also having a tightening effect on the market both on Crude, LNG and middle distillates. Add also in that Donald Trump needs a higher oil price to drive US oil production higher. So even if we find it likely that Brent crude will make a pullback below the 80-line, it does not mean that this is the end of the gains.

Net long speculative positions in Brent + WTI in million barrels

52-week ranking of speculative positions in Brent + WTI and 52-week ranking of 1-7mth Brent time-spread.

Brent crude 1mth vs. Dubai 1-3mth time spread. The Dubai time-spread is probably less impacted by speculative positions and thus a better reflection of actual physical conditions. This is rising yet a little more this morning.

Brent moves into sideways trading around USD 81.5/b with new tests to the 80-line likely. Brent crude traded down 0.9% yesterday to a close of USD 81.29/b and traded as low as USD 80.39/b within the day. This morning it is gaining 0.3% to USD 81.6/b. No obvious major driver for that and the move in oil is well in line with higher industrial metals this morning. The technical picture for Brent 1M is still overbought in terms of RSI at 70.2. But as Brent now has traded a bit sideways for some days the overbought bearish calculus has started to ease a bit. But new tests towards the 80-line seems likely with current RSI at 70.2.

Scott Bessent says he fully supports harder sanctions on Russian oil exports if Donald Trump wishes to use such a tool in the coming negotiations with Russia over Ukraine. That may add some support to oil this morning. The latest US sanctions towards Russia clearly have an effect with one example being the tanker Bhilva which has made a U-turn back towards Russia after having been on course to India (Bloomberg).

US EIA projects US liquids growth of 538 kb/d/y in 2025. The US EIA released its monthly STEO report earlier this week. What is clear is that the boom-years in US oil production are behind us for now. But exactly pinning down at what level US oil production will grow in 2025 is hard. The EIA forecast for US hydrocarbon liquids looks the following:

Estimated US crude oil production growth is projected to be virtually zero in 2026. But including all sources of liquids it still sums up to 312 kb/d y/y in growth. A lot or a little? If global oil demand in 2026 only grows with 1 mb/d in 2026, then the US will cover 30% of global demand growth. That is a lot. For 2025 the EIA expects a total growth in US liquids of 538 kb/d y/y. 

Smaller losses in existing shale oil production. If we instead look at EIA estimates for US shale oil production right here and now and how its components are changing, we see that 1) New monthly production is 666 kb/d, 2) Losses in existing production is 622 kb/d and thus 3) Net monthly growth is 44 kb/d m/m which equals 4) A net marginal annualized growth of 12*44 of 523 kb/d/y. What stands out here is that the EIA in its December report estimated that this marginal annualization only equated to 378 kb/d/y. So, it has been lifted markedly in the latest report. It is however on a downward trajectory and as such the EIA estimate in the table above of y/y growth for US crude oil of 331 kb/d/y may be sensible.

US shale oil new production, losses in existing production, net new production and marginal, annualized production growth in kb/d/y.

Change in EIA STEO forecast from Dec-24 to Jan-25. What stands out is that estimated losses in existing production is adjusted lower by 16.8 kb/d since November. That is the marginal monthly change. In other words, production in existing production is falling less agressively than estimated in December. But a monthly decline of 622 kb/d/m is of course still massive.

Brent crude jumped jet another 2.7%. Brent crude jumped 2.7% yesterday to USD 82.03/b following a pull-back on Tuesday. Intraday it reached USD 82.63/b and its highest level since 26 July last year. Bullish US oil inventory data was a key reason for the jump higher yesterday coming on top of a steady tightening market since early December and fresh US sanctions on Russia last week.

US crude stocks down 17.6 mb since mid-November and total US commercial stocks down 65 mb since mid-July. US crude stocks fell 2 mb last week to its lowest level since April 2022. US crude stocks have declined every week since mid-November with a total of 17.6 mb. Total US commercial oil inventories fell 3.4 mb last week and have been in steady decline of close to 300 kb/d since early July. These declines in US oil stocks are the proof of the pudding in terms of the balance of the global oil market and explains well the rising oil prices since early December.

The IEA estimates a 400 kb/d deficit in H2-24. If so, then all global draws took place in the US. The IEA released its monthly Oil Market Report (OMR) yesterday with an estimate that the global oil market ran a deficit of about 400 kb/d through H2-24. If so, then close to all inventory draws in the whole world solely took place in US inventories which drew down by around 300 kb/d. That is hard to believe.

If we assume that US inventory draws were proportional to the US demand share of the world (about 20%), then global inventory draws in H2-24 probably was closer to 0.3/20% which equals 1.5 mb/d. Maybe a bit high but estimates by FGE indicates that global inventory draws were close to 1.0 mb/d in H2-24 depending on whether you equate on apparent demand or real demand. Higher if equated on real demand.

IEA surplus in 2025 is adjusted down by 200 kb/d. In reality it is now only a surplus of 400 kb/d. We think this surplus estimate will erode further as demand will be adjusted yet higher and supply will be adjusted yet lower going forward. The IEA adjusted 2024 demand higher by 100 kb/d with base effect to 2025 with the same. It also adjusted its non-OPEC production estimate for 2025 down by 100 kb/d. The effect was that call-on-OPEC rose by 200 kb/d for 2025. The IEA still estimates that OPEC must reduce its production by 0.6 mb/d in 2025 to keep market balanced and prices steady. But within that estimate it assumes that FSU increases production by 200 kb/d as if it is not a part of OPEC+. IEA estimate for call-on-OPEC+ thus only declines by 400 kb/d y/y in 2025. We think that this surplus will evaporate as: 1) US production will likely deliver a bit lower than expected. 2) Supply will also disappoint here and there around the world. 3) Global demand estimates will be revised higher for 2024 and 2025.

The rally thus has legs, but the technical picture is still in overbought territory so there will be some pullbacks on the way higher. Unless of course we rally all the way to USD 95/b and THEN we get the technical pullback. The market still seems to have bearish skepticism deeply ingrained in its back following H2-24 doom and gloom and is partially reluctant to trade higher. But that is attitude and not fundamentals.

The Dubai 1-3 mth time-spread is going through the roof as Asian buyers scrambles for supply from the Middle East.

The average 1-3 mth time-spread of Dubai, Brent and WTI is now way up. Lots of room for Brent 1M to move USD 90-95/b

US crude stocks declined by 2 mb last week and total commercial stocks by 3.4 mb.

US commercial crude and product stocks in steady decline since June/July last year. Down 65 mb since mid-July.

US crude stocks at lowest level since 2022.

Brent 1M still overbought with RSI at 72.5. So, pullbacks will happen but from what level. On the upside the next targets are probably USD 87.95/b and USD 92.18/b.