Analys
What is behind the recent fall in US crude oil stocks?
US crude oil stocks have fallen significantly during the summer months. This was mainly attributable to an increase in crude oil processing. In this way US refineries reacted to robust demand for middle distillates, which is reflected in low US distillate stocks and record US distillate exports. As crude oil processing declines, US crude oil stocks will likely rise again in the fourth quarter. Robust US distillate exports are exerting pressure on refinery margins in Europe, which will probably increase Europe’s dependency on imports of oil products.
US crude oil stocks have fallen significantly during the summer months. Since the end of June they have declined by 38m barrels and in mid-September reached their lowest level for 18 months. Destocking has been concentrated on two regions: in the Midwest (PADD 2) stocks have fallen by more than 20m barrels, and on the US Gulf Coast (PADD 3) by more than 14m barrels (chart 1). The lion’s share of the destocking in the Midwest related to the storage hub in Cushing, where stocks have fallen by a total of 16.5m barrels for 13 weeks in succession. What is the reason for this surprising trend and will the destocking continue?
The trend in stock levels can be divided into three sub-components: on the supply side are US oil production and US oil imports, and on the demand side, crude oil processing by refineries. US oil production has increased until recently. In mid-September it reached its highest level since May 1989 of more than 7.4m barrels per day. This component cannot therefore explain the destocking of recent weeks. On the other hand, imports of crude oil have fallen sharply. In the summer months they were, on average, 1m barrels per day lower than in the previous year. However, this will not be sufficient to balance out the simultaneous increase in US oil production. Between the end of June and mid-September this was, on average, 1.4m barrels per day above the previous year’s level. The trend on the supply side would therefore have been an indication of stockbuilding. The main reason for the significant destocking this summer is therefore to be found on the demand side, i.e. from the higher volumes of crude oil processed at refineries.
Crude oil processing in the USA was higher than usual this summer
US refineries stepped up crude oil processing much more significantly than usual this summer. Between the end of June and mid-September, an average of 16m barrels of crude oil was processed daily. This was 600,000 barrels per day more than in the corresponding period last year, and 900,000 barrels per day more than the long-term average level (chart 2). At the beginning of July, more crude oil was processed than at any time in the last eight years. It was also striking that refineries maintained processing rates at their high levels of July and August up to mid-September. Normally, refineries scale back their utilisation from the end of August as the summer driving season approaches an end. Refineries usually use the time in early autumn to carry out maintenance and to switch operations to the winter season. Hence, significantly more crude oil has been processed this summer than would otherwise be normal at this time of the year. This has only been possible by consistently dipping into crude oil stocks, although more crude oil has also been available as a result of the increased level of domestic oil production.
This cannot be explained with trends in the US gasoline market…
The fact that US refineries have increased their crude oil processing so strongly over an extended period this summer cannot be explained by trends in the US gasoline market, which is normally the most important driver of refinery activity in the summer months. Demand for gasoline in the US during the summer driving season showed virtually no increase compared to last year. US gasoline stocks have remained consistently 5 to 6 per cent above their long-term average for weeks with a few exceptions. US gasoline production was just slightly higher this summer than in the previous years. Moreover, the US exported less gasoline between March and July than one year ago, according to the EIA.
…but is attributable to distillate production in particular
The reason for the unusually high level of refinery activity over a prolonged period is above all attributable to middle distillates. US refineries have significantly increased the production of middle distillates in particular. This increased to an average of 5m barrels per day in the summer months, which was 13% higher than average for the last five years. More than half of the increase in crude oil processing this summer is therefore attributable to the middle distillates segment. The varying trend in processing margins is likely to have played a part here. While margins for gasoline production have fallen to the lowest level since end of 2011, they are still relatively high for middle distillates (chart 3). The fact that margins for middle distillates have held up much better is attributable to low US distillate stocks, which have remained well below their long-term average levels despite robust production of middle distillates.
Strong demand for distillates in and outside the USA
This is mainly the result of higher domestic demand and robust demand for distillates from abroad. Distillate demand from US consumers was 10% higher than last year during the summer months and 6% above the average of the last five years. Moreover, the USA exported 1.276m barrels of middle distillates per day on balance in July after having reached a level nearly as high in June (chart 4, page 3). Daily net distillate exports were almost twice as high in June and July as in the first four months of the year and also 26% above the same period last year. Weekly estimates from the US Energy Information Administration also indicate that distillate exports remained at a similarly high level in August and September.
Refinery activity is unlikely to sustain these exceptionally high levels
US refineries have benefited from cheaper crude oil from the country’s interior until recently, which, thanks to new pipeline capacity, can be transported to the US Gulf Coast, where roughly half of US refinery capacity is situated. This also enables US refineries to avoid the continuing restrictions on crude oil exports from the USA, since these restrictions do not apply to the export of oil products. Despite everything, US refineries are unlikely to maintain their distinctly high levels of crude oil processing of recent months, given lower margins. The EIA expects average crude oil processing of 15.3m barrels per day in the fourth quarter. This would still be more than 500,000 barrels per day above the average of the last five years, but some 600,000 barrels per day less than in the third quarter. The lower demand for crude oil from refineries indicates higher stock levels, if US oil imports are not being reduced markedly, as US oil production is likely to increase further as a result of the surge in shale oil production in North Dakota and Texas. In fact, the decline in US crude oil stocks seems to have come to an end. In the second half of September stocks were already increasing by roughly 8m barrels, due to lower volume of crude oil processing and higher oil imports.
Decline in crude oil stocks has recently also slowed at Cushing
The 13-week long decline in crude oil stocks at Cushing has also weakened visibly in recent weeks (chart 5). Whereas, between the beginning of July and the end of August, on balance an average of 1.36m barrels of crude oil per week were drained off Cushing, in September the figure had fallen to an average of less than 500,000 barrels per week. At the end of September, the decline in stocks at Cushing had almost come to an end. Should stocks be built up also at Cushing in the weeks ahead, this would not be attributable to a lack of transport or processing capacities. These are now sufficient – as the steady fall in Cushing stocks over the summer months despite rising shale oil production in the Midwest demonstrated. In fact, once the Southern leg of the Keystone XL pipeline is completed, additional transport capacities of 700,000 barrels per day will be available by year-end. A stock build-up would instead be attributable to lower crude oil processing at refineries. This should exert pressure on the WTI price in particular.
Record US distillate exports creating problems for refineries in Europe
What are the implications of these trends for Europe? According to data from the EIA, the USA was already exporting record volumes of middle distillates to Europe in May and June. Based on shipping data, this trend has continued in September. The high levels of US distillate exports will exert pressure on refinery margins in Europe. Despite low gasoil stocks, the price differential between gasoil and Brent oil has been moving in a narrow range around USD 15 per barrel for some months, which is hardly sufficient to offset the very low margins in gasoline production. The situation has been compounded by the fact that the USA itself has now become a net gasoline exporter. As a result the US market – formerly the most important sales market for European refineries – has been lost. At the same time, the USA is also competing in gasoline on other sales markets such as South America, for instance. Further refinery closures in Europe are thus on the cards, which would further increase Europe’s dependency on imports of oil products.
Held in check within a tight range. Brent managed to stage a small 0.4% gain yesterday. It closed at USD 69.56/b and traded within a range of USD 68.63 – 7.44/b. This morning it is adding another 0.4% to USD 69.8/b. Since 4 March it has closed within a tight range of USD 69.28 – 70.36/b and traded within a slightly wider range of USD 68.33 – 71.4/b.
Depressed by US equity market sell-off saying dark clouds are on the horizon. When we look at the dips to the 70-line and below since late 2021 we see that they have been very brief with little staying power at that level. Bouncing back up very quickly. Just a quick touch. This time however we have been staying down around the 70-line for 6-7 days. Despite the fact that the front-end 1-3mth time-spreads have held up and have not fallen off a cliff.
What stands out with the current selloff versus the previous selloffs is the sharp decline in the S&P 500 index. (SPX) Down 9.3% since 19 Feb. The SPX index is the ”canary in the coal mine”. It is all about the negative fallout from Trump-Tariff-Turmoil and all the other erratic and disrupting actions from Trump. The US equity market is saying that this is BAD for the US economy. And if so, it is usually also bad for the rest of the world in the old sense that ”when the US sneezes the rest of the world catches a cold”.
The implication of this is that if we now get an equity market rebound, then we are likely to get an oil price rebound as well since that is what seems to hold back the Brent crude oil price at the current level.
To all we can see however, Donald Trump does not seem to back off. He is steamrolling ahead. Drugged by his own power and assumed infallibility. The fear by investors which the SPX index is signaling aren’t going to go away except for temporary rebounds. Instead, we are likely to see increasing negative readings in a range of macro variables going forward as a consequence of what Trump is currently doing. The single reason for why we at all doubt that this will be the case is because we have never, ever seen anything like this out of the US in some 100 years or more.
US EIA says, ”all is good” while US oil veteran says, ”prepare for USD 50-60/b”. The US EIA ydy published its monthly oil market report (STEO). It projects a smaller surplus in 2025 with Brent crude averaging USD 74/b this year and USD 68/b next year. Fundamental to this forecast is that all is good and well with global oil demand growing by 1.4 mb/d this year and by 1.6 mb/d in 2026. No negative fallout with respect to global oil demand there reflecting the potential negative economic fallout from Trump-Turmoil.
The US shale oil pioneer Scott Sheffield on the other hand says that ”you’ve really got to hunker down” and prepare for oil to drop to USD 50-60/b as non-US production grows while China demand peaks. That is even without taking any note on possible negative fallout from current Trump actions. What Scott is saying here is echoed by the US Energy Secretary Chris Wright, the previous CEO of Liberty Energy, North America’s second largest hydraulic fracturing company, who has recently said that we’ll likely see a period of industry disruption ahead similar to the price war between OPEC and US shale oil producers in 2014.
These statements from US shale oil veterans in combination with the current vote of no confidence by US equity investors should be taken very seriously.
But then OPEC+ is always a wildcard and can counter oil price declines due to global macro weakness quite quickly as the group today meets on a regular monthly basis.
The Brent 1mth contract has been trading in a very tight range and for significant longer than the previous dips to the 70-line since late 2021 which lasted for only a day or two.
The Brent crude 1mth contract is probably currently held down and in check just below the 70-line because of the ”canary in the coal mine” SPX selloff signaling dark clouds on the horizon.
If the oil market was inherently bearishly fragile it should have sold off much more yesterday. Brent crude fell 1.5% yesterday to USD 69.28/b amid an overall very bearish market sentiment where the SPX index fell 2.7% amid increasing concerns for the damages Trump is doing to the US economy and the increasing risks for a US recession with Trump himself saying that a recession is possible but that in the longer-term everything will be better. Amid such an overall bearish market sentiment one could argue that the 1.5% decline in Brent crude yesterday was a fairly limited decline. Maybe because Brent has sold off so extensively since mid-January and thus has taken out a lot of downside action already. This morning Brent is up 0.3% to USD 69.5/b. Though still below the magical USD 70/b, but not much. If the oil market was inherently bearishly fragile it should have sold off much more yesterday.
A weakening of the 1-3mth time-spreads probably needed for Brent 1M to move lower. The 1-3mth time-spreads are holding quite steady. No rapid deterioration to be seen yet. And the flat price Brent 1mth contract is trading weakly versus the average 1-3mth time-spread of Brent, WTI and Dubai with Dubai the strongest. To see further aggressive downside price action, we probably need to see further deterioration in the front-end time-spreads.
A period of industry disruption ahead says US Energy secretary. The US Energy secretary Chris Wright has told the Financial Times that we’ll likely see a period of industry disruption ahead similar to the price war between OPEC and US shale oil producers in 2014. But that the US shale oil industry will come out stronger and with much lower costs than before. This is definitely not what the market is pricing in today. It can only take place if either OPEC+ or US shale oil producers boosts production or if we get a global recession. OPEC+ looks set for a controlled and gradual lifting of production and US shale oil players looks set for a very careful production growth. With such signals from Crish Wright one should think that US shale oil players will play an even more defensive game in fear of possibly tumbling prices. The signals from Crish Wright are chilling to say the least, but it is highly unclear how he is going to pull it off.
Brent 1mth has taken out the USD 68.68/b but has still not followed through to yet lower levels than the recent USD 68.33/b.
1-3mth time spreads of Brent, WTI and Dubai have recovered since mid-Feb and are holding out quite strongly. No deterioration to been seen at the moment.
The average 1-3mth time-spreads of Brent, WTI and Dubai versus the Brent 1mth contract.
The average Brent 1mth price at current 1-3mth time-spreads at current level historically.
Analys
OPEC+ can probably stomach a flat to slight contango market during a period where they lift production
Brent fell 3.9% as OPEC+ will produce more in April. Brent crude fell 3.9% last week to USD 70.36/b. Following a low of USD 68.33/b, the lowest since December 2021, it rebounded on Friday with an intraday high that day of USD 71.4/b. The message from OPEC+ at the end of February that they will start to lift production from April was the main bearish driver.
Net long specs are folding their cards as bullish prospects fade. Net long speculative positions in Brent and WTI fell 73.8 mb to 344 mb over the week to Tuesday April 4. It is still well above the 162 mb length on 10 Sep when Brent bottomed at USD 68.68/b. I.e. we came to a lower price level this time around with higher specs than on 10 Sep. Speculators thus has potential to shed more length if the bearish sentiment continuous.
Weakening of the crude curve – how far? OPEC+ preference is flat to backwardated. But the group can probably stomach flat to slight contango during a period where they lift production. The Brent crude structure has been in steady decline since the Brent 1mth to 60mth price spread peaked at USD 47.4/b on 10 June 2022. The latest signal from OPEC+ of more oil supply into a period of projected surplus calls for yet softer crude curve structure as rising inventories naturally should drive it into contango with front-end discount to longer dated prices. But OPEC+ has a natural distaste for a contango market as they then sell their oil at a discount to assumed non-OPEC+ marginal costs.
The 1mth to 60mth time spread has gone into deep contango three times over the past 20 years. Negative macro shocks in 2008/09 and in 2020 were countered by OPEC(+). But it took some time to drive the Brent curve back to flat/backwardated. In 2014/15 it was deliberate action by OPEC in order to ”kill US shale oil producers” but OPEC policy was reversed in 2016, and OPEC+ was created.
OPEC+ is unlikely to repeat 2014/15. The group is still in full control. It can probably accept a flat curve and stomach a little contango for a while. But deep contango like in 2008/09 and in 2020 will require a negative macro-shock. A flat curve implies a Brent 1mth at USD 67/b (= five year contract). But longer dated contracts have a tendency to weaken a little when the front-end weakens.
Brent crude 1mth down to USD 68.33/b last week and lowest since Dec 2021.
A substantial weakening of the Brent crude oil curve since July 2024. Still front-end backwardation. Longer dated price holding steady around USD 67/b. But it was closer to USD 70/b in July 2024.
The Brent 1mth still holds a small premium of USD 3.2/b over the 60mth contract. But clear fading since 2022.
The Brent 1mth to 60mth price spread. Deep contango three times over past 20 years. Deliberate by OPEC in 2014/15. But negative macro shock in 2008/09 and 2020. OPEC+ can probably accept a flat curve and stomach a light contango over a little period while they place some of their volumes back into the market. But deep contango requires a sharp, negative macro shock.
Net long speculative positions fell 73.8 mb last week. Still some length to shed if bearish sentiment persists.
52 week ranking of Brent 1 to 7 mth curve structure and net long speculative positions in Brent + WTI.
Crude oil comment: Unable to rebound as the US SPX is signaling dark clouds on the horizon
Crude oil comment: Not so fragile yet. If it was it would have sold off more yesterday
OPEC+ can probably stomach a flat to slight contango market during a period where they lift production
Oversold. Rising 1-3mth time-spreads. Possibly rebounding to USD 73.5/b before downside ensues
A deliberate measure to push oil price lower but it is not the opening of the floodgates
Glansen är tillbaka på guldet
Hemp Innovation skriver off-take-avtal för industriell hampafiber
Christian Kopfer om guld, olja och stål
I mars offentliggör EU en lista på prioriterade gruvprojekt, betydelsefullt för Norra Kärr
Crude oil comment: Tariffs spark small reactions, but price gains hold steady
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanGlansen är tillbaka på guldet
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedanHemp Innovation skriver off-take-avtal för industriell hampafiber
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanChristian Kopfer om guld, olja och stål
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedanI mars offentliggör EU en lista på prioriterade gruvprojekt, betydelsefullt för Norra Kärr
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Tariffs spark small reactions, but price gains hold steady
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Stronger inventory build than consensus, diesel demand notable
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan70 procent av världens koboltproduktion exportstoppas i fyra månader
-
Analys2 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Price reaction driven by intensified sanctions on Iran