Analys
Trump holds the key for commodities

In a summer when investors have been caught off guard by everything from emerging market woes and the dollar’s tailwind to a brewing trade war, commodity markets have once again appeared in the crosshairs in terms of market turbulence. This time, it is not China, OPEC or oil which are central to crisis, but rather it is the USD-financed emerging markets and their mined metal and soft commodity production. We do not think the emerging markets crisis will be a China crisis and we believe that copper and zinc are set to rebound.
Starting point is Trump’s politics
Three major President Trump-related developments are having a significant impact on the commodity universe right now. First, the US decision to leave the Iran agreement and impose sanctions in two stages against Tehran laid the ground for a more direct market pricing of any similar actions against other countries.
Second, sanctions were imposed on Russia, and and most recently, US import tariffs on steel and aluminium were doubled on Turkey.
Third, on top of sanctions, developments in the trade war stalled during the summer and the positions of the various sides appeared to become locked.
These developments served to illustrate the US approach to emerging markets, in our view, and changed market pricing, kicking off a divergence between the pricing of US assets and those of emerging markets.
Turkey will not spread to Asia
If the Turkish currency crisis is not staved off, the risk of a financial system meltdown and, ultimately, a government debt default is high. But even though Spanish banks are vulnerable, Turkey’s problems should not hurt the overall eurozone economy to a significant degree. Euro weakness and European stock market declines due to the escalation of Turkey’s crisis therefore seem to be overdone. However, Turkey is far from out of the woods yet and the situation might need to worsen still to convince Turkey to adopt a painful, but more sustainable, path toward regaining financial markets’ trust. Other emerging markets with similar challenges, such as South Africa, Argentina and Pakistan, also face tough times ahead.
China stands out
What ties the affected emerging market countries together this time is expensive USD financing. China is not among them. This is can be seen clearly by studying developments in the cost of credit default swaps, or CDS.
China has barely moved while Turkey and Argentina have gone through the roof. Among the worst hit are Brazil, South Africa and Russia. These countries have also seen their currencies underperform along with their local equity markets.
As currencies have fallen, investors have started to anticipate an increase in the export of commodities to secure income. We have seen agricultural commodities trading lower, as seasonal stockpiles are expected to be shipped at a higher rate than normal.
Numbers point to a brighter future
The idea that fear is stronger than greed is relevant here, in our view. We think the first phase of President Trump’s threatening of the emerging markets is over. Running the numbers on the impact of tariffs still points to a bright future. It is hard to prove that tariffs will take a meaningful toll on growth in consumption, we believe. The impact on corporate investment is more difficult to judge. Typically, there are many negative assumptions made ahead of investments decisions. After President Trump’s “flip flop” policies, there is scope for many more multinational companies. Our base case is that President Trump will sign a deal with China in November, in time to influence the midterm elections. In such a scenario, we think base metals would recover, especially copper. Within base metals, it is clear that those more exposed to the Asian construction sector, e.g. copper and zinc, have been the greatest losers, while nickel has done much better, supported by a larger share of demand coming from the US and Europe, posting positive data during the summer.
Oil is all about Iran
The first phase of the new US sanctions against Iran came into force in August. Among other things, this means that Iran cannot use USD. However, sanctions on oil exports will not come into effect until November. These sanctions will probably not hit the country as hard as the previous ones, as they do not have the support of the rest of the world.
Oil prices rose after, among other things, the French oil company Total announced at the OPEC meeting in June that it had already stopped buying oil from Iran. This decision was a typical action in line with American sanctions, whereby a company safeguards its activities in the US and prioritises trade with the US as the larger market. President Trump also always has the option of taking sanctions against Iran to the next level. As with the last occasion that the US used sanctions against Iran, the country could forbid all companies that trade with Iran from having access to the huge US market, and prevent dollar funding. This makes the US sanctions very effective.
In the first half of the year, leaders from the EU tried to get the US to remain in the Iran agreement and presented a series of measures to instead put pressure on Iran, including closing down the missile programme. The Trump administration considered the measures to be insufficient, and chose to withdraw from the agreement. Now, the administration has urged Iran to return to the negotiating table to formulate a more comprehensive agreement than the previous one; however, Iran has stated that the US must first revert to the agreement before negotiations can recommence.
In our view, the current sanctions are fully accounted for in the oil price and a certain amount of ‘over-compliance’, such as in the example of Total, is also priced in. However, what has not been included in the oil price, in our view, is the reality of President Trump taking a step further and cutting off Iran from the global economy completely. In that case, for example, China would not be able to import oil from Iran. The latest decrease in the oil price (from around USD 78/barrel in early July to USD 72) can mainly be attributed to the escalating trade war between the US and China, in our view, but this does not mean that the situation with Iran has become any less significant.
Sparkling electricity market
Power markets have surged during the summer as because of weak hydro supply and high temperatures (Nordic reservoirs now 18% below seasonal norm). Prices also supported by strong fuels complex and Emission Rights hitting a 7-year high EUR 19.33 at the time of this being published.
Analys
Tightening fundamentals – bullish inventories from DOE

The latest weekly report from the US DOE showed a substantial drawdown across key petroleum categories, adding more upside potential to the fundamental picture.

Commercial crude inventories (excl. SPR) fell by 5.8 million barrels, bringing total inventories down to 415.1 million barrels. Now sitting 11% below the five-year seasonal norm and placed in the lowest 2015-2022 range (see picture below).
Product inventories also tightened further last week. Gasoline inventories declined by 2.1 million barrels, with reductions seen in both finished gasoline and blending components. Current gasoline levels are about 3% below the five-year average for this time of year.
Among products, the most notable move came in diesel, where inventories dropped by almost 4.1 million barrels, deepening the deficit to around 20% below seasonal norms – continuing to underscore the persistent supply tightness in diesel markets.
The only area of inventory growth was in propane/propylene, which posted a significant 5.1-million-barrel build and now stands 9% above the five-year average.
Total commercial petroleum inventories (crude plus refined products) declined by 4.2 million barrels on the week, reinforcing the overall tightening of US crude and products.


Analys
Bombs to ”ceasefire” in hours – Brent below $70

A classic case of “buy the rumor, sell the news” played out in oil markets, as Brent crude has dropped sharply – down nearly USD 10 per barrel since yesterday evening – following Iran’s retaliatory strike on a U.S. air base in Qatar. The immediate reaction was: “That was it?” The strike followed a carefully calibrated, non-escalatory playbook, avoiding direct threats to energy infrastructure or disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz – thus calming worst-case fears.

After Monday morning’s sharp spike to USD 81.4 per barrel, triggered by the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, oil prices drifted sideways in anticipation of a potential Iranian response. That response came with advance warning and caused limited physical damage. Early this morning, both the U.S. President and Iranian state media announced a ceasefire, effectively placing a lid on the immediate conflict risk – at least for now.
As a result, Brent crude has now fallen by a total of USD 12 from Monday’s peak, currently trading around USD 69 per barrel.
Looking beyond geopolitics, the market will now shift its focus to the upcoming OPEC+ meeting in early July. Saudi Arabia’s decision to increase output earlier this year – despite falling prices – has drawn renewed attention considering recent developments. Some suggest this was a response to U.S. pressure to offset potential Iranian supply losses.
However, consensus is that the move was driven more by internal OPEC+ dynamics. After years of curbing production to support prices, Riyadh had grown frustrated with quota-busting by several members (notably Kazakhstan). With Saudi Arabia cutting up to 2 million barrels per day – roughly 2% of global supply – returns were diminishing, and the risk of losing market share was rising. The production increase is widely seen as an effort to reassert leadership and restore discipline within the group.
That said, the FT recently stated that, the Saudis remain wary of past missteps. In 2018, Riyadh ramped up output at Trump’s request ahead of Iran sanctions, only to see prices collapse when the U.S. granted broad waivers – triggering oversupply. Officials have reportedly made it clear they don’t intend to repeat that mistake.
The recent visit by President Trump to Saudi Arabia, which included agreements on AI, defense, and nuclear cooperation, suggests a broader strategic alignment. This has fueled speculation about a quiet “pump-for-politics” deal behind recent production moves.
Looking ahead, oil prices have now retraced the entire rally sparked by the June 13 Israel–Iran escalation. This retreat provides more political and policy space for both the U.S. and Saudi Arabia. Specifically, it makes it easier for Riyadh to scale back its three recent production hikes of 411,000 barrels each, potentially returning to more moderate increases of 137,000 barrels for August and September.
In short: with no major loss of Iranian supply to the market, OPEC+ – led by Saudi Arabia – no longer needs to compensate for a disruption that hasn’t materialized, especially not to please the U.S. at the cost of its own market strategy. As the Saudis themselves have signaled, they are unlikely to repeat previous mistakes.
Conclusion: With Brent now in the high USD 60s, buying oil looks fundamentally justified. The geopolitical premium has deflated, but tensions between Israel and Iran remain unresolved – and the risk of missteps and renewed escalation still lingers. In fact, even this morning, reports have emerged of renewed missile fire despite the declared “truce.” The path forward may be calmer – but it is far from stable.
Analys
A muted price reaction. Market looks relaxed, but it is still on edge waiting for what Iran will do

Brent crossed the 80-line this morning but quickly fell back assigning limited probability for Iran choosing to close the Strait of Hormuz. Brent traded in a range of USD 70.56 – 79.04/b last week as the market fluctuated between ”Iran wants a deal” and ”US is about to attack Iran”. At the end of the week though, Donald Trump managed to convince markets (and probably also Iran) that he would make a decision within two weeks. I.e. no imminent attack. Previously when when he has talked about ”making a decision within two weeks” he has often ended up doing nothing in the end. The oil market relaxed as a result and the week ended at USD 77.01/b which is just USD 6/b above the year to date average of USD 71/b.

Brent jumped to USD 81.4/b this morning, the highest since mid-January, but then quickly fell back to a current price of USD 78.2/b which is only up 1.5% versus the close on Friday. As such the market is pricing a fairly low probability that Iran will actually close the Strait of Hormuz. Probably because it will hurt Iranian oil exports as well as the global oil market.
It was however all smoke and mirrors. Deception. The US attacked Iran on Saturday. The attack involved 125 warplanes, submarines and surface warships and 14 bunker buster bombs were dropped on Iranian nuclear sites including Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. In response the Iranian Parliament voted in support of closing the Strait of Hormuz where some 17 mb of crude and products is transported to the global market every day plus significant volumes of LNG. This is however merely an advise to the Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the Supreme National Security Council which sits with the final and actual decision.
No supply of oil is lost yet. It is about the risk of Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz or not. So far not a single drop of oil supply has been lost to the global market. The price at the moment is all about the assessed risk of loss of supply. Will Iran choose to choke of the Strait of Hormuz or not? That is the big question. It would be painful for US consumers, for Donald Trump’s voter base, for the global economy but also for Iran and its population which relies on oil exports and income from selling oil out of that Strait as well. As such it is not a no-brainer choice for Iran to close the Strait for oil exports. And looking at the il price this morning it is clear that the oil market doesn’t assign a very high probability of it happening. It is however probably well within the capability of Iran to close the Strait off with rockets, mines, air-drones and possibly sea-drones. Just look at how Ukraine has been able to control and damage the Russian Black Sea fleet.
What to do about the highly enriched uranium which has gone missing? While the US and Israel can celebrate their destruction of Iranian nuclear facilities they are also scratching their heads over what to do with the lost Iranian nuclear material. Iran had 408 kg of highly enriched uranium (IAEA). Almost weapons grade. Enough for some 10 nuclear warheads. It seems to have been transported out of Fordow before the attack this weekend.
The market is still on edge. USD 80-something/b seems sensible while we wait. The oil market reaction to this weekend’s events is very muted so far. The market is still on edge awaiting what Iran will do. Because Iran will do something. But what and when? An oil price of 80-something seems like a sensible level until something do happen.
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
USA slår nytt produktionsrekord av naturgas
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
All eyes on OPEC V8 and their July quota decision on Saturday
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Stor uppsida i Lappland Guldprospekterings aktie enligt analys
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Brookfield ska bygga ett AI-datacenter på hela 750 MW i Strängnäs
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Sommaren inleds med sol och varierande elpriser
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
OPEC+ ökar oljeproduktionen trots fallande priser
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Silverpriset släpar efter guldets utveckling, har mer uppsida
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Tradingfirman XTX Markets bygger datacenter i finska Kajana för 1 miljard euro