Analys
Råvarudeskens Årskrönika 2013

”Tailrisk-tapering-flattening”
Året då stimulanserna tog slut
Under 2012 var ”tailrisk” modeordet som sammanfattade alla händelser av låg sannolikhet som skulle få stor inverkan om de inträffade. För råvarumarknaden var den mest uppenbara tailrisken konflikten mellan Israel och Iran. På makroplanet var riskerna kring EMU-zonen och USA:s konjunkturåterhämtning mest alarmerande tillsammans med Kinas inbromsning.
För att tysta Janne Korp* blandade USA, Kina och Europa ihop en trolldryck som hette duga. QE3 och Kinas sista egentliga stimulansinvesteringar kom under sensommaren 2012, medan 2013 har i mångt och mycket präglats av att stimulansfloden torkat upp. För USA:s del har episoden gått under namnet ”tapering” som också blev årets modeord. Bernankes ordlek kring när och hur tapering skulle uppstå har styrt marknadsrörelserna för att slutligen anlända som en vältimad julklapp i december. I Öst har de nytillträdda (inte nyvalda!) kinesiska ledarnas dito kommunikation kring tillväxtmålet som sänktes till 7,5 % och stimulansinvesteringar som nu skulle stabilisera och inte accelerera tillväxten haft minst lika stor påverkan på råvarupriserna.
Inget råvarurally
Fjolårets årskrönika titulerades ”Triskaidekafobia” – en grekisk ordlek med rädslan för den då stundande siffran 13. Otursnumret förde också ner råvarupriserna med besked. Vårt råvaruindex med 15 stycken råvaror tappade 8 % under året. Ingen av råvarusektorerna har stigit i värde. Energikorgen slutar precis under nollan på -1 % medan basmetaller, ädelmetaller och jordbruk föll med 12 %, 25 % och 8 %. Precis som i fjol ligger en jordbruksråvara i topp och på 2 av 3 bottenplatser. En tydlig erinran om vädergudens bidrag till volatiliteten i råvarupriserna. På samma tema finns majs och vete som fallit tillbaka efter fjolårets uppgång efter torkan i USA. Basmetallerna har dämpats efter att mycket av de högt ställda förväntningarna på produktionsökningar kommit till stånd. Ädelmetallerna har dock fallit mest, i egenskap av primär måltavla för årets modenyck – tapering.
Fallande priser har fått investerare att vikta ner råvaror medan våra industriella kunder utnyttjat de låga priserna på metaller för att säkra sina behov långt ut på kurvan. Elintensiva bolag kunde låsa in elpriset på 29,5öre/kWh 5 år framöver, vilket är det lägsta pris vi haft sedan 2005. Många lyckosamma jordbrukare sålde vete i grevens tid i början av året, innan den globala skörden på allvar fick priserna på fall.
* olyckskorpen i Fablernas värld, producerad 1968-1992
Guldet mitt i skottgluggen
Året började med en stark förbättring av konjunkturutsikterna när USA undvek en skarp inbromsning efter det fiskala stupet och riskerna för att Euron skulle brytas upp minskade. I kölvattnet av denna starka start ökade investerares riskaptit och både guld och silver såldes till fördel för aktier. När sedan den oortodoxa penningpolitiken åter skulle börja tvingas in ramen för ortodox politik hamnade guld och silver mitt i skottgluggen. Utflödena ur guld-ETF:er var lavinartade och guld har under 2013 tappat 28 %, det största raset på 30 år. Investerare har allt sedan Fed:s QE1-start 2008 köpt guld och silver som hedge mot det kommande inflationsspöket. Spöket kom visserligen men snarare under namnet deflationsspöke (USA+EMU) och när nu Feds stimulanser avtar finner många guldgrävare det smärtsamma slutet på epoken för ”råvaran som inte kan gå ned”. När 2014 ser ut att bli ett säkrare år för världskonjunkturen, eurozonen fortfarande är intakt och Iran har kommit till förhandlingsbordet tror vi att guldet fortsätter ner och investerare som vill ha en icke centralbanksknuten valuta väljer Bitcoins (!).
Gruvbolagen försöker vända skutan
Även utanför Sverige har gruvindustrin känt på prövningar under året som gått. I de tre stora gruvbolagen listade i London (Rio, BHP och Anglo America) har VD:n fått betala med sitt jobb när kostnadsstrukturen totalt missmatchat Kinas inbromsning och de lägre metallpriserna. Efterträdarna har målat upp bolagsstrategi i klassisk svångremsanda. Trendmässigt kan det vara ett tecken på att de senaste årens produktionsvåg huvudsakligen är över och för 2014 ser marknaden mer balanserad ut. Undantaget är järnmalm och koppar där en ny våg kommer under 2014.
Nedgången för basmetaller kom under första halvåret då Kinas inbromsning verkade ske helt okontrollerat. När Kinas nya ledare började stimulera för att stabilisera ekonomin stabiliserades också basmetallerna. Ett rally under december avslutade året klart över bottenkänningen kring midsommar.
Brent blev årets skidbacke
Under buller och bång har USA:s oljeproduktion stigit till 25 års högsta. På mindre än tre år har världens största oljekonsument vänt 40 år av fallande oljeproduktion till den största överraskningen i oljehistorien. Glädjande för oljepropagandamaskineriets fader, Obama, var också att under 2014 kommer importen för första gången på 20 år att vara lägre än produktionen. Denna utbudschock till trots har Brentoljan handlats i backwardation under hela året. USA:s stigande produktion har ganska precist kompenserats av den sammanlagda exportminskningen ifrån Iran, Libyen, Irak och Nigeria. De eviga produktionsstörningarna i områden med inverkan på Brentpriset (FOB Shetlandsöarna) har lett till en kraftig kurvlutning som gett investerare 12 % trots att Brent bara stigit med 6 %. USA-handlade WTI oljan har med stigande produktion istället legat i contango och givit dyr rullning för råvaruindex med WTI som underliggande oljetillgång.
Råolja och oljeprodukterna bensin och diesel slutar året svagt i dur medan el blev årets besvikelse och föll hämningslöst under årets sista kvartal. En mild början på vintern (trots alla granna rönnbärsträd i oktober), en snabb påfyllning av vattenmagasinen från ett underskott till normalnivå och en sällsynt välfungerande svensk kärnkraft utgjorde mixen bakom prisraset i el.
Torkan över för den här gången
Årets stora rörelse var återhämtningen i produktion av majs efter torkan i USA 2012. Priset föll som en sten och placerade majs i botten av all råvaror 2013. Vinnaren bland livsmedelsråvarorna blev kakao som fortsätter sin långa, efterfrågedrivna trend uppåt. Utsikterna för stigande kakaopriser är fortfarande goda och lämnar en bitter eftersmak för chokladälskare.
Nu börjar hästens år
Hästens år är sjunde året i den kinesiska zodiakens cykel om 12 år. Hästen står för det ädla och eleganta men också för snabbhet och uthållighet. Frågan är om den kinesiska ekonomin likaledes kommer uppvisa snabbhet och uthållighet under 2014? Troligen kommer den kinesiska ekonomin att hålla styrfart (>7 %) men uppsidan begränsas hela tiden av reformbehoven som ständigt aktualiseras när saker och ting ser ljusare ut. USA ska enligt Fed nu klara sig utan stimulanser medan Europa tragglar vidare precis norr om recession (1 %). Budskapet är tydligt; vi tror att ”flattening” kommer bli årets modeord 2014.
Analys
Quadruple whammy! Brent crude down $13 in four days

Brent Crude prices continued their decline heading into the weekend. On Friday, the price fell another USD 4 per barrel, followed by a further USD 3 per barrel drop this morning. This means Brent crude oil prices have crashed by a whopping USD 13 per barrel (-21%) since last Wednesday high, marking a significant decline in just four trading days. As of now, Brent crude is trading at USD 62.8 per barrel, its lowest point since February 2021.

The market has faced a ”quadruple whammy”:
#1: U.S. Tariffs: On Wednesday, the U.S. unveiled its new package of individual tariffs. The market reacted swiftly, as Trump followed through on his promise to rebalance the U.S. trade position with the world. His primary objective is a more balanced trade environment, which, naturally, weakened Brent crude prices. The widespread imposition of strict tariffs is likely to fuel concerns about an economic slowdown, which would weaken global oil demand. This macroeconomic uncertainty, especially regarding tariffs, calls for caution about the pace of demand growth.
#2: OPEC+ hike: Shortly after, OPEC+ announced plans to raise production in May by 41,000 bpd, exceeding earlier expectations with a three-monthly increment. OPEC emphasized that strong market fundamentals and a positive outlook were behind the decision. However, the decision likely stemmed from frustration within the cartel, particularly after months of excess production from Kazakhstan and Iraq. Saudi Arabia’s Energy Minister seemed to have reached his limit, emphasizing that the larger-than-expected May output hike would only be a “prelude” if those countries didn’t improve their performance. From Saudi Arabia’s perspective, this signals: ”All comply, or we will drag down the price.”
#3: China’s retaliation: Last Friday, even though the Chinese market was closed, firm indications came from China on how it plans to handle the U.S. tariffs. China is clearly meeting force with force, imposing 34% tariffs on all U.S. goods. This move raises fears of an economic slowdown due to reduced global trade, which would consequently weaken global oil demand going forward.
#4: Saudi price cuts: At the start of this week, oil prices continued to drop after Saudi Arabia slashed its flagship crude price by the most in over two years. Saudi Arabia reduced the Arab Light OSP by USD 2.3 per barrel for Asia in May, while prices to Europe and the U.S. were also cut.
These four key factors have driven the massive price drop over the last four trading days. The overarching theme is the fear of weaker demand and stronger supply. The escalating trade war has raised concerns about a potential global recession, leading to weaker demand, compounded by the surprisingly large output hike from OPEC+.
That said, it’s worth questioning whether the market is underestimating the risk of a U.S.-Iran conflict this year.
U.S. military mobilization and Iran’s resistance to diplomacy have raised the risk of conflict. Efforts to neutralize the Houthis suggest a buildup toward potential strikes on Iran. The recent Liberation Day episode further underscores that economic fallout is not a constraint for Trump, and markets may be underestimating the threat of war in the Middle East.
With this backdrop, we continue to forecast USD 70 per barrel for this year (2025). For reference, Brent crude averaged USD 75 per barrel in Q1-2025.
Analys
Lowest since Dec 2021. Kazakhstan likely reason for OPEC+ surprise hike in May

Collapsing after Trump tariffs and large surprise production hike by OPEC+ in May. Brent crude collapsed yesterday following the shock of the Trump tariffs on April 2 and even more so due to the unexpected announcement from OPEC+ that they will lift production by 411 kb/d in May which is three times as much as expected. Brent fell 6.4% yesterday with a close of USD 70.14/b and traded to a low of USD 69.48/b within the day. This morning it is down another 2.7% to USD 68.2/b. That is below the recent low point in early March of USD 68.33/b. Thus, a new ”lowest since December 2021” today.

Kazakhstan seems to be the problem and the reason for the unexpected large hike by OPEC+ in May. Kazakhstan has consistently breached its production cap. In February it produced 1.83 mb/d crude and 2.12 mb/d including condensates. In March its production reached a new record of 2.17 mb/d. Its crude production cap however is 1.468 mb/d. In February it thus exceeded its production cap by 362 kb/d.
Those who comply are getting frustrated with those who don’t. Internal compliance is an important and difficult issue when OPEC+ is holding back production. The problem naturally grows the bigger the cuts are and the longer they last as impatience grows over time. The cuts have been large, and they have lasted for a long time. And now some cracks are appearing. But that does not mean they cannot be mended. And it does not imply either that the group is totally shifting strategy from Price to Volume. It is still a measured approach. Also, by lifting all caps across the voluntary cutters, Kazakhstan becomes less out of compliance. Thus, less cuts by Kazakhstan are needed in order to become compliant.
While not a shift from Price to Volume, the surprise hike in May is clearly a sign of weakness. The struggle over internal compliance has now led to a rupture in strategy and more production in May than what was previously planned and signaled to the market. It is thus natural to assign a higher production path from the group for 2025 than previously assumed. Do however remember how quickly the price war between Russia and Saudi Arabia ended in the spring of 2020.
Higher production by OPEC+ will be partially countered by lower production from Venezuela and Iran. The new sanctions towards Iran and Venezuela can to a large degree counter the production increase from OPEC+. But to what extent is still unclear.
Buy some oil calls. Bullish risks are never far away. Rising risks for US/Israeli attack on Iran? The US has increased its indirect attacks on Iran by fresh attacks on Syria and Yemen lately. The US has also escalated sanctions towards the country in an effort to force Iran into a new nuclear deal. The UK newspaper TheSun yesterday ran the following story: ”ON THE BRINK US & Iran war is ‘INEVITABLE’, France warns as Trump masses huge strike force with THIRD of America’s stealth bombers”. This is indeed a clear risk which would lead to significant losses of supply of oil in the Middle East and probably not just from Iran. So, buying some oil calls amid the current selloff is probably a prudent thing to do for oil consumers.
Brent crude is rejoining the US equity selloff by its recent collapse though for partially different reasons. New painful tariffs from Trump in combination with more oil from OPEC+ is not a great combination.

Analys
Tariffs deepen economic concerns – significantly weighing on crude oil prices

Brent crude prices initially maintained the gains from late March and traded sideways during the first two trading days in April. Yesterday evening, the price even reached its highest point since mid-February, touching USD 75.5 per barrel.
However, after the U.S. president addressed the public and unveiled his new package of individual tariffs, the market reacted accordingly. Overnight, Brent crude dropped by close to USD 4 per barrel, now trading at USD 71.6 per barrel.
Key takeaways from the speech include a baseline tariff rate of 10% for all countries. Additionally, individual reciprocal tariffs will be imposed on countries with which the U.S. has the largest trade deficits. Many Asian economies end up at the higher end of the scale, with China facing a significant 54% tariff. In contrast, many North and South American countries are at the lower end, with a 10% tariff rate. The EU stands at 20%, which, while not unexpected given earlier signals, is still disappointing, especially after Trump’s previous suggestion that there might be some easing.
Once again, Trump has followed through on his promise, making it clear that he is serious about rebalancing the U.S. trade position with the world. While some negotiation may still occur, the primary objective is to achieve a more balanced trade environment. A weaker U.S. dollar is likely to be an integral part of this solution.
Yet, as the flow of physical goods to the U.S. declines, the natural question arises: where will these goods go? The EU may be forced to raise tariffs on China, mirroring U.S. actions to protect its industries from an influx of discounted Chinese goods.
Initially, we will observe the effects in soft economic data, such as sentiment indices reflecting investor, industry, and consumer confidence, followed by drops in equity markets and, very likely, declining oil prices. This will eventually be followed by more tangible data showing reductions in employment, spending, investments, and overall economic activity.
Ref oil prices moving forward, we have recently adjusted our Brent crude price forecast. The widespread imposition of strict tariffs is expected to foster fears of an economic slowdown, potentially reducing oil demand. Macroeconomic uncertainty, particularly regarding tariffs, warrants caution regarding the pace of demand growth. Our updated forecast of USD 70 per barrel for 2025 and 2026, and USD 75 per barrel for 2027, reflects a more conservative outlook, influenced by stronger-than-expected U.S. supply, a more politically influenced OPEC+, and an increased focus on fragile demand.
___
US DOE data:
Last week, U.S. crude oil refinery inputs averaged 15.6 million barrels per day, a decrease of 192 thousand barrels per day from the previous week. Refineries operated at 86.0% of their total operable capacity during this period. Gasoline production increased slightly, averaging 9.3 million barrels per day, while distillate (diesel) production also rose, averaging 4.7 million barrels per day.
U.S. crude oil imports averaged 6.5 million barrels per day, up by 271 thousand barrels per day from the prior week. Over the past four weeks, imports averaged 5.9 million barrels per day, reflecting a 6.3% year-on-year decline compared to the same period last year.
The focus remains on U.S. crude and product inventories, which continue to impact short-term price dynamics in both WTI and Brent crude. Total commercial petroleum inventories (excl. SPR) increased by 5.4 million barrels, a modest build, yet insufficient to trigger significant price movements.
Commercial crude oil inventories (excl. SPR) rose by 6.2 million barrels, in line with the 6-million-barrel build forecasted by the API. With this latest increase, U.S. crude oil inventories now stand at 439.8 million barrels, which is 4% below the five-year average for this time of year.
Gasoline inventories decreased by 1.6 million barrels, exactly matching the API’s reported decline of 1.6 million barrels. Diesel inventories rose by 0.3 million barrels, which is close to the API’s forecast of an 11-thousand-barrel decrease. Diesel inventories are currently 6% below the five-year average.
Over the past four weeks, total products supplied, a proxy for U.S. demand, averaged 20.1 million barrels per day, a 1.2% decrease compared to the same period last year. Gasoline supplied averaged 8.8 million barrels per day, down 1.9% year-on-year. Diesel supplied averaged 3.8 million barrels per day, marking a 3.7% increase from the same period last year. Jet fuel demand also showed strength, rising 4.2% over the same four-week period.
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Ticking higher as tariff-panic eases. Demand growth and OPEC+ will be key
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude prices hold gains amid fresh tariff threats
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Ett samtal om råvarorna som behövs för batterier
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Tysklands SEFE skriver avtal om att köpa 1,5 miljarder ton LNG per år från Delfin i USA
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
700 timmar med negativa elpriser och dyrare biobränsle gav lägre resultat för Jämtkraft
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Danska Seaborg Technologies siktar på serieproduktion av smältsaltsreaktorer till mitten av 2030-talet
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Brent Edges Lower After Resisting Equity Slump – Sanctions, Saudi Pricing in Focus
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Oljepriserna slaktas på samtidiga negativa faktorer