Analys
LME Week 2013 på en sida
LME-veckan är dagarna då industrin för basmetaller samlas i London och försöker bilda sig en uppfattning om var priserna på metallerna ska ta vägen. Hemma efter årets LME-vecka sammanfattar vi diskussioner, teman och frågor.
Lagerköer
För tredje året i rad, och med eskalerande intensitet diskuterades problemet med köer för att få ut metall ur LME:s lagerhus. LME:s karismatiske ledare Charles Li adresserade problemet med eftertryck (precis som förra året) men mellan orden ekade det tomt. Intet nytt under solen alltså när det gäller LME:s förmåga att få bukt med problemet att få ut metall ur lagerhusen. Situationen förklarar mycket av de höga premier på fysisk metall som vi sett under 2013. Zink och aluminium handlas omkring sina 10 års medelvärde men premien för fysisk metall ligger omkring 50-100 % över 10 års-snittet.
CFTC
”Commitment of Traders Report” har varit hett i försnacket inför veckan. Rapporteringen för råvaror handlade i USA ger en föredömlig översikt hur investerare är positionerade i respektive råvara. Trycket ökar på LME att avlägga motsvaran de data för de LME-handlade metallerna och Charles Li sade sig välkomna initiativet. LME har nog mycket att vinna på ökad transparens. LME säger att handelsvolymerna är 7 % högre hittills i år men de flesta metallhandlare vi talar med vittnar om lägre handlade volymer. En märklig diskrepans.
Överskott puttar ner koppar från tronen
LME index handlas 8 procent lägre under årets konferens än under 2012 års dito. Koppar har gått från att under 2012 vara den starkaste metallen till att hittills i år falla med 12 %. Starkare utsikter för ökad produktion är huvudskälet. Bland de metaller som fallit mest av samma skäl hittar vi nickel som tappat 19 % i år. Tenn är den enda basmetall som stigit hittills i år. Handlarna återspeglar också marknaden; bly och tenn var de metaller som flest trodde skulle stiga kommande 12 månader. En plats som koppar haft under de senaste åren. Favoritmetall att vara kort var återigen aluminium. Överskottet på metallmarknaden verkar vara det som plågar flest av deltagarna, främst på stål där antalet handelstvister (AD/ CVD) ökar kraftigt och utgör ett hot mot den öppna marknaden trots ett globalt kapacitetsutnyttjande om ca 75 %.
Olönsam produktion
Den senaste tiden har tvingat flera producenter att stänga produktion på grund av de låga priserna. Glencore:s nickelgruva Falcondo med kapacitet för 30 kt Nickel per år i Dominikanska rep är ett bra exempel. Alcoa och Rusal har stängt ner viss aluminiumproduktion. Stängningarna har varit inom nickel och aluminium, de två metaller som har högst lager och störst överskott. Ser vi till stål är efterfrågan i EU ned 30 % utan några större stängningar. Ca 5-7 ugnar kan tvingas stänga inom EU vilket blir en het politisk fråga precis som med Ilvas verk i Taranto.
Firm floor & soft ceiling
Supercykeln på råvaror är långt från över, kanske om man ser till cykeln av kraftiga prisrörelser, men fokus förflyttas till alla utmaningar på utbudssidan för att möta efterfrågan på längre sikt. Kraftigt ökade kostnader (vikande halter, geografiska och teknologiska utmaningar, miljöavgifter, brist på kvalificerad arbetskraft etc.) och svårigheter att få finansiering är oroande. Stora nedskrivningar av tillgångsvärden har gjort att investerarkollektivet fokuserar mer på projekt med starka kassaflöden och undviker projekt i riskzoner.
Fjolårets kinafokus fanns kvar men det rådde större tillit till landets framtid efter årets ledarskapsskifte. I likhet med vår egen tro på en starkare kinesisk utveckling de kommande 6 månaderna så får Kinesisk makro representera det mest positiva inslaget från dagarna i London.
Analys
Brent prices slip on USD surge despite tight inventory conditions
Brent crude prices dropped by USD 1.4 per barrel yesterday evening, sliding from USD 74.2 to USD 72.8 per barrel overnight. However, prices have ticked slightly higher in early trading this morning and are currently hovering around USD 73.3 per barrel.
Yesterday’s decline was primarily driven by a significant strengthening of the U.S. dollar, fueled by expectations of fewer interest rate cuts by the Fed in the coming year. While the Fed lowered borrowing costs as anticipated, it signaled a more cautious approach to rate reductions in 2025. This pushed the U.S. dollar to its strongest level in over two years, raising the cost of commodities priced in dollars.
Earlier in the day (yesterday), crude prices briefly rose following reports of continued declines in U.S. commercial crude oil inventories (excl. SPR), which fell by 0.9 million barrels last week to 421.0 million barrels. This level is approximately 6% below the five-year average for this time of year, highlighting persistently tight market conditions.
In contrast, total motor gasoline inventories saw a significant build of 2.3 million barrels but remain 3% below the five-year average. A closer look reveals that finished gasoline inventories declined, while blending components inventories increased.
Distillate (diesel) fuel inventories experienced a substantial draw of 3.2 million barrels and are now approximately 7% below the five-year average. Overall, total commercial petroleum inventories recorded a net decline of 3.2 million barrels last week, underscoring tightening market conditions across key product categories.
Despite the ongoing drawdowns in U.S. crude and product inventories, global oil prices have remained range-bound since mid-October. Market participants are balancing a muted outlook for Chinese demand and rising production from non-OPEC+ sources against elevated geopolitical risks. The potential for stricter sanctions on Iranian oil supply, particularly as Donald Trump prepares to re-enter the White House, has introduced an additional layer of uncertainty.
We remain cautiously optimistic about the oil market balance in 2025 and are maintaining our Brent price forecast of an average USD 75 per barrel for the year. We believe the market has both fundamental and technical support at these levels.
Analys
Oil falling only marginally on weak China data as Iran oil exports starts to struggle
Up 4.7% last week on US Iran hawkishness and China stimulus optimism. Brent crude gained 4.7% last week and closed on a high note at USD 74.49/b. Through the week it traded in a USD 70.92 – 74.59/b range. Increased optimism over China stimulus together with Iran hawkishness from the incoming Donald Trump administration were the main drivers. Technically Brent crude broke above the 50dma on Friday. On the upside it has the USD 75/b 100dma and on the downside it now has the 50dma at USD 73.84. It is likely to test both of these in the near term. With respect to the Relative Strength Index (RSI) it is neither cold nor warm.
Lower this morning as China November statistics still disappointing (stimulus isn’t here in size yet). This morning it is trading down 0.4% to USD 74.2/b following bearish statistics from China. Retail sales only rose 3% y/y and well short of Industrial production which rose 5.4% y/y, painting a lackluster picture of the demand side of the Chinese economy. This morning the Chinese 30-year bond rate fell below the 2% mark for the first time ever. Very weak demand for credit and investments is essentially what it is saying. Implied demand for oil down 2.1% in November and ytd y/y it was down 3.3%. Oil refining slipped to 5-month low (Bloomberg). This sets a bearish tone for oil at the start of the week. But it isn’t really killing off the oil price either except pushing it down a little this morning.
China will likely choose the US over Iranian oil as long as the oil market is plentiful. It is becoming increasingly apparent that exports of crude oil from Iran is being disrupted by broadening US sanctions on tankers according to Vortexa (Bloomberg). Some Iranian November oil cargoes still remain undelivered. Chinese buyers are increasingly saying no to sanctioned vessels. China import around 90% of Iranian crude oil. Looking forward to the Trump administration the choice for China will likely be easy when it comes to Iranian oil. China needs the US much more than it needs Iranian oil. At leas as long as there is plenty of oil in the market. OPEC+ is currently holds plenty of oil on the side-line waiting for room to re-enter. So if Iran goes out, then other oil from OPEC+ will come back in. So there won’t be any squeeze in the oil market and price shouldn’t move all that much up.
Analys
Brent crude inches higher as ”Maximum pressure on Iran” could remove all talk of surplus in 2025
Brent crude inch higher despite bearish Chinese equity backdrop. Brent crude traded between 72.42 and 74.0 USD/b yesterday before closing down 0.15% on the day at USD 73.41/b. Since last Friday Brent crude has gained 3.2%. This morning it is trading in marginal positive territory (+0.3%) at USD 73.65/b. Chinese equities are down 2% following disappointing signals from the Central Economic Work Conference. The dollar is also 0.2% stronger. None of this has been able to pull oil lower this morning.
”Maximum pressure on Iran” are the signals from the incoming US administration. Last time Donald Trump was president he drove down Iranian oil exports to close to zero as he exited the JCPOA Iranian nuclear deal and implemented maximum sanctions. A repeat of that would remove all talk about a surplus oil market next year leaving room for the rest of OPEC+ as well as the US to lift production a little. It would however probably require some kind of cooperation with China in some kind of overall US – China trade deal. Because it is hard to prevent oil flowing from Iran to China as long as China wants to buy large amounts.
Mildly bullish adjustment from the IEA but still with an overall bearish message for 2025. The IEA came out with a mildly bullish adjustment in its monthly Oil Market Report yesterday. For 2025 it adjusted global demand up by 0.1 mb/d to 103.9 mb/d (+1.1 mb/d y/y growth) while it also adjusted non-OPEC production down by 0.1 mb/d to 71.9 mb/d (+1.7 mb/d y/y). As a result its calculated call-on-OPEC rose by 0.2 mb/d y/y to 26.3 mb/d.
Overall the IEA still sees a market in 2025 where non-OPEC production grows considerably faster (+1.7 mb/d y/y) than demand (+1.1 mb/d y/y) which requires OPEC to cut its production by close to 700 kb/d in 2025 to keep the market balanced.
The IEA treats OPEC+ as it if doesn’t exist even if it is 8 years since it was established. The weird thing is that the IEA after 8 full years with the constellation of OPEC+ still calculates and argues as if the wider organisation which was established in December 2016 doesn’t exist. In its oil market balance it projects an increase from FSU of +0.3 mb/d in 2025. But FSU is predominantly part of OPEC+ and thus bound by production targets. Thus call on OPEC+ is only falling by 0.4 mb/d in 2025. In IEA’s calculations the OPEC+ group thus needs to cut production by 0.4 mb/d in 2024 or 0.4% of global demand. That is still a bearish outlook. But error of margin on such calculations are quite large so this prediction needs to be treated with a pinch of salt.
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: OPEC+ meeting postponement adds new uncertainties
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Vad den stora uppgången i guldpriset säger om Kina
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Meta vill vara med och bygga 1-4 GW kärnkraft, begär in förslag från kärnkraftsutvecklare
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Kina gör stor satsning på billig kol i Xinjiang
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
OPEC takes center stage, but China’s recovery remains key
-
Analys2 veckor sedan
Brent crude rises 0.8% on Syria but with no immediate risk to supply
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
De tre bästa aktierna inom olja, gas och råvaror enligt Rick Rule
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Christian Kopfer ger sin syn på den stora affären mellan Boliden och Lundin Mining