Följ oss

Analys

The last hurrah from Vienna

Publicerat

den

Handelsbanken - Råvarubrevet - Nyhetsbrev om råvaror

Kvartalsrapport för råvaror från HandelsbankenWe see a close to 100% probability of an extension of oil production cuts from OPEC at the upcoming OPEC meeting in Vienna on May 25. For H2 2017, we see compliance with proposed cuts as a much more difficult issue than the deal itself. We think there is a 95% probability that Russia will sign on for a new six-month production cut period, but we see only a 30% probability that Russia will keep compliance for that period. Oil cuts during H2 2017 will come at a high cost due to seasonally higher production. We believe the next big price turn will come from non-compliance from Russia in particular but also other OPEC countries, as growing US production shows evidence of the futility of subsidising growth there by keeping production off stream. Saudi Arabia seems assured that production cuts at any price are the right way to go; it seems to us that the longer OPEC tries to keep production down, the more such measures backfire.

Core OPEC members give a good lead

Oil inventoriesThe OPEC and several other key producers including Russia have agreed to cut production by 1.8 million bbl/d for H1 2017 to reduce global glut, formally defined as retreating global stocks to normal levels, i.e. the five-year average. It is increasingly clear that the target will not be reached after the first six months of this year. Saudi Arabian oil minister Al-Falih opened up initially for an extension for H2 2017, and last week for nine months, including Q1 2018. Other core OPEC members have gradually confirmed the extension as well. We assume a Brent crude price of USD 50 fully reflects a six-month extension of OPEC production cuts.

Saudi Arabia supports extension

It has become obvious that Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, who has emerged as Saudi Arabia’s leading economic force, was the architect behind the Saudis’ policy U-turn in Doha, leading up to the cut at the official meeting in Vienna in November 2016. In our view, this was confirmed by the shuffle of the Kingdom’s oil minister, replacing Ali al-Naimi after two decades. If this were a game of chess, we would view this as a rokade.

Prince Mohammed has designated divesting Armaco at the top of his agenda, and that forms the basis of the Saudis’ policy and willingness to cut production in compensation for a short-term higher oil price.

Costly mistake

US oil productionThe savvy players recognise the danger of taking real action in cutting production. History is repeating itself. Higher prices have reversed the US production drop, extending the time it takes for the market to balance, and pushing the volume share away from OPEC and toward two non-cut participants, the US and lately also Libya.

We strongly argue it was too early for OPEC to take action. The rebalancing process had another year, perhaps two, before running its course. If OPEC had waited, a number of bankruptcies in the US energy sector would have played out, and some banks would have lost their faith in energy lending for a long time. Instead, US shale oil is growing at the same rate as it did before the 2014 oil slump and production is now higher than in 2014, which was about the time that OPEC initiated its strategy aimed at knocking off higher costs by flooding the market. Costs are dynamic, however, and the low-price era has pushed breakeven levels lower and provided a solid platform for future growth.

Shale oil growthRussia: biggest loser in extension deal

We base our strong opinion of a low 30% chance of an implemented cut during the second half on Russia’s seasonal oil production pattern. Russia has shown its usual low interest in active cuts, and takes its cut from a very high October 2016 production as a reference point for the curbs. Russia has cut about 250,000 bbl/d from its pledge of a 300,000 bbl/d cut, but production is still 1.6% higher than in 2016 and export are 2.14% higher than in March 2016. The first quarter is seasonally weak in Russian crude production, while the second half is stronger, and cuts in the seasonal peak require a strong commitment. We doubt that Russia will turn down additional market share for the sake of Saudi Arabia’s Aramco divestment.

 

Russian production

Russia has another reason to be careful in long-term cooperation with the Saudis. Russia has been successful in grabbing market share in China, the only oil consumer growing at any significant pace. This is not the right time to give up footprint anywhere, as competition will increase in all markets ahead.

“Everything is fine”

With little chance of action from Vienna on May 25, we think eroding compliance will set the tone after the May meeting. The oil price will likely hover at around USD 40/bbl when the agreement on production cuts vanishes, and an extension of production cuts will not come into question at the second OPEC meeting this year in November-December.

Saudi and Russia oil production

 

Research disclaimer

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Risk warning

All investments involve risks and investors are encouraged to make their own decision as to the appropriateness of an investment in any securities referred to in this report, based on their specific investment objectives, financial status and risk tolerance. The historical return of a financial instrument is not a guarantee of future return. The value of financial instruments can rise or fall, and it is not certain that you will get back all the capital you have invested.

Research disclaimers

Handelsbanken Capital Markets, a division of Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ) (collectively referred to herein as ‘SHB’), is responsible for the preparation of research reports. SHB is regulated in Sweden by the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority, in Norway by the Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway, in Finland by the Financial Supervisory Authority and in Denmark by the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority. All research reports are prepared from trade and statistical services and other information that SHB considers to be reliable. SHB has not independently verified such information and does not represent that such information is true, accurate or complete. Accordingly, to the extent permitted by law, neither SHB, nor any of its directors, officers or employees, nor any other person, accept any liability whatsoever for any loss, however it arises, from any use of such research reports or its contents or otherwise arising in connection therewith.

In no event will SHB or any of its affiliates, their officers, directors or employees be liable to any person for any direct, indirect, special or consequential damages arising out of any use of the information contained in the research reports, including without limitation any lost profits even if SHB is expressly advised of the possibility or likelihood of such damages.

The views contained in SHB research reports are the opinions of employees of SHB and its affiliates and accurately reflect the personal views of the respective analysts at this date and are subject to change. There can be no assurance that future events will be consistent with any such opinions. Each analyst identified in this research report also certifies that the opinions expressed herein and attributed to such analyst accurately reflect his or her individual views about the companies or securities discussed in the research report.

Research reports are prepared by SHB for information purposes only. The information in the research reports does not constitute a personal recommendation or personalised investment advice and such reports or opinions should not be the basis for making investment or strategic decisions. This document does not constitute or form part of any offer for sale or subscription of or solicitation of any offer to buy or subscribe for any securities nor shall it or any part of it form the basis of or be relied on in connection with any contract or commitment whatsoever. Past performance may not be repeated and should not be seen as an indication of future performance. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may forfeit all principal originally invested. Investors are not guaranteed to make profits on investments and may lose money. Exchange rates may cause the value of overseas investments and the income arising from them to rise or fall. This research product will be updated on a regular basis.

No part of SHB research reports may be reproduced or distributed to any other person without the prior written consent of SHB. The distribution of this document in certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law and persons into whose possession this document comes should inform themselves about, and observe, any such restrictions.

The report does not cover any legal or tax-related aspects pertaining to any of the issuer’s planned or existing debt issuances.

Analys

Saudi won’t break with OPEC+ to head calls for more oil from Trump

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Rebounding after yesterday’s drop but stays within recent bearish trend. Brent crude sold off 1.8% yesterday with a close of USD 77.08/b. It hit a low on the day of USD 76.3/b. This morning it is rebounding 0.8% to USD 77.7/b. That is still below the 200dma at USD 78.4/b and the downward trend which started 16 January still looks almost linear. A stronger rebound than what we see this morning is needed to break the downward trend.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Saudi won’t break with OPEC+ to head calls for more oil from Trump. OPEC+ will likely stick to its current production plan as it meets next week. The current plan is steady production in February and March and then a gradual, monthly increase of 120 kb/d/mth for 18 months starting in April. These planned increases will however highly likely be modified along the way just as we saw the group’s plans change last year. When they are modified the focus will be to maintain current prices as the primary goal with production growth coming second in line. There is very little chance that Saudi Arabia will unilaterally increase production and break the OPEC+ cooperation in response to recent calls from Trump. If it did, then the rest of OPEC+ would have no choice but to line up and produce more as well with the result that the oil price would totally collapse.

US shale oil producers have no plans to ramp up activity in response to calls from Trump. There are no signs that Trump’s calls for more oil from US producers are bearing any fruits. US shale oil producers are aiming to slow down rather than ramp up activity as they can see the large OPEC+ spare capacity of 5-6 mb/d sitting idle on the sideline. Even the privately held US shale oil players who account for 27% of US oil production are planning to slow down activity this year according to Jefferies Financial Group. US oil drilling rig count falling 6 last week to lowest since Oct 2021 is a reflection of that.

The US EIA projects a problematic oil market from mid-2025. Stronger demand would be the savior. Looking at the latest forecast from the US EIA in its January STEO report one can see why US shale oil producers are reluctant to ramp up production activity. If EIA forecast pans out, then either OPEC+ has to reduce production or US shale oil producers have to if they want to keep current oil prices. The savior would be global economic acceleration and higher oil demand growth.

Saudi Arabia to lift prices for March amid tight Mid-East crude market. But right now, the market is very tight for Mid-East crude due to Biden-sanctions. The 1-3mth Dubai time-spread is rising yet higher this morning. Saudi Arabia will highly likely lift its Official Selling Prices for March in response.

US EIA January STEO report. Global demand and supply growth given as 3mth average y-y diff in mb/d and the outright 3mth average demand diff to 3mth average supply in mb/d. Projects a surplus market where either US shale oil producers have to produce less, or OPEC+ has to produce less.

Global demand and supply growth given as 3mth average y-y diff in mb/d and the outright 3mth average demand diff to 3mth average supply in mb/d.
Source: SEB graph and calculations, US EIA data

Forward prices for ICE gasoil swaps in USD/ton. Deferred contracts at very affordable levels.

Forward prices for ICE gasoil swaps in USD/ton.
Source: SEB graph and highlights, Bloomberg data
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Brent rebound is likely as Biden-sanctions are creating painful tightness

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Bearish week last week and dipping lower this morning on China manufacturing and Trump-tariffs. Brent crude traded down 4 out of five days last week and lost 2.8% on a Friday-to-Friday basis with a close of USD 78.5/b. It hit the low of USD 77.8/b on Friday while it managed to make a small 0.3% gain at the end of the week with a close that was marginally below the 200dma. This morning it is trading down 0.4% at USD 78.2/b amid general market bearishness. China manufacturing PMI down to 49.1 for January versus 50.1 in December is pulling copper down 1.3%. Trump threatening Colombia with tariffs.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Rebound in crude prices likely as Dubai time-spreads rises further. The Dubai 1-3mth time-spread is rising to a new high this morning of USD 3.7/b. It is a sign that the Biden-sanctions towards Russia is making the medium sour crude market very tight. Brent crude is unlikely to fall much lower as long as these sanctions are in place. Will likely rebound.

Asian buyers turning to the Mid-East to replace Russian barrels. Amin Nasser, CEO of Saudi Aramco, said that the new sanctions are affecting 2 out of 3.4 mb/d of Russian seaborne crude oil exports. Strong bids for Iraqi medium and heavy crudes are sending spot prices to Asia to highest premiums versus formula pricing since August 2023. And Europe is seeing spot premiums to formula pricing at highest since 2021 (Argus).  

Strong rise in US oil production is a losing hand. A lot of Trump-talk about a 3 mb/d increase in US oil production. Occidental Petroleum CEO Vicki Hollub commented in Davos that it is possible given the US resource base, but it is not the right thing to do since the global market is oversupplied (Argus). Everyone knows that OPEC+ has a spare capacity of 5-6 mb/d on hand. The comfort zone is probably to have a spare capacity of around 3 mb/d. FIRST the group needs to re-deploy some 3 mb/d of its current spare capacity and THEN the US and the rest of non-OPEC+ can start to think about acceleration in supply growth again. Vicki Hollub understands this and highly likely all the other oil CEOs in the US understands this as well. Donald Trump calling for more US oil will not be met before market circumstances allows it. Even sanctions on Iran forcing 1.5-2.0 mb/d of its crude exports out of the market will first be covered by existing surplus spare capacity within OPEC6+ and not the US.

US oil drilling rig count fell by 6 to 472 last week and lowest since October 2021. Current decline could be due to winter weather in the US but could also be like Hollub commented in Davos arguing that US oil production growth is not the right thing to do.

1-3mth time-spreads in USD/b. Dubai to yet higher level this morning. Even Brent and WTI are rebounding. Could be some extra spike since we are moving towards the end of the month. But it is still indicating a very tight market for medium sour crude as a result of the latest Biden-sanctions.

1-3mth time-spreads in USD/b. Dubai to yet higher level this morning. Even Brent and WTI are rebounding.
Source: SEB graph, calculations and highlights, Bloomberg data

US oil drilling rig count down 6 last week to lowest level since October 2021

US oil drilling rig count down 6 last week to lowest level since October 2021
Source: Bloomberg

Non-OPEC, non-FSU production to grow 1.4 mb/d in 2025. Third weakest in 4 years. Though still a bit more than total expected global oil demand growth of 1.1 mb/d/y (IEA)

Non-OPEC, non-FSU production to grow 1.4 mb/d in 2025.
Source: SEB graph and calculations, IEA data
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Brent testing the 200dma at USD 78.6/b with API indicating rising US oil inventories

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent touching down to the 200dma. Brent crude traded down for a fifth day yesterday with a decline of 0.4% to USD 70/b.  This morning it has traded as low as USD 78.6/b and touched down and tested the 200dma at USD 78.6/b before jumping back up and is currently trading up 0.2% on the day at USD 79.1/b.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

The Dubai 1-3mth time-spread is holding up close to recent highs. The 1-3mth time spreads for WTI and Brent crude have eased significantly. The Dubai 1-3mth spread is however holding up close to latest high. Indian refiner Bharat is reported to struggle to get Russian crude for March delivery (Blbrg). The Biden-sanctions are clearly having physical market effects. So, the Dubai 1-3mth time-spread holding on to recent high makes a lot of sense. I.e. it was not just a spike on fears.

US oil inventories may have risen 6 mb last week (API). Actual data later today. The US DOE will release US oil data for last week later today. The US API last night indicated that US crude and product stocks may have risen close to 6 mb last week. This may be weighing on the oil price today.

Brent and WTI 1-3mths time-spreads have fallen back while Dubai is holding up

Brent and WTI 1-3mths time-spreads have fallen back while Dubai is holding up
Source: SEB graph and calculations, Bloomberg data

Brent crude is no longer overbought. Down touching the 200dma before bouncing back up a lilttle.

Brent crude is no longer overbought. Down touching the 200dma before bouncing back up a lilttle.
Source: Bloomberg graph
Fortsätt läsa

Centaur

Guldcentralen

Fokus

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Populära