Analys
Defensive Assets: Gold, a precious ally in the fight against equity drawdown

In the previous instalments of this blog series, we highlighted the defensive behaviour of quality and high dividend equities, long duration government bonds and safe haven currencies as an asset, as well as an overlay to other asset classes. The last few weeks really put investors’ portfolio to the test and the least we can say is that those defensive assets did very well. While Global Equities (MSCI World net TR) lost 17.91% from the most recent tops on 12th February up to 9th March, Long Duration Treasuries (proxied by the Bloomberg Barclays US Treasury 10+) have return an incredible +21.99%. In the same period, Japanese Yen was up 7.54% versus the US Dollar and Quality stocks (proxied by the WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth net TR) did cushion the fall, losing 15.73% and therefore outperforming the market by 2.27%1.
This week, our journey takes us to a fourth asset class, Commodities. Using our defensive framework, we will assess how single commodities or commodity sectors react to equity downturn. In particular, we will highlight how:
- precious metals such as Gold can bring potential diversification and defensiveness to a portfolio as well as act as inflation hedge on the upside. Gold was up 6.96% from 12th February to 9th March 2020;
- Broad commodities could act as a diversifier in a multi asset portfolio.
In the following, we analyse traditional Commodity benchmarks that use front month futures to invest in the different commodities in the universe (being commodities in general or sectors). The only exception are precious metals, were physical investments are considered (physical bullions in vaults for Gold for example). Enhanced commodities are meant to represent “smart beta” in commodities where the strategy can invest further along the curve (i.e. not always in the front month future) to improve the roll yield available to the investor while delivering similar spot and collateral returns. More information on this topic is available on our website. Those strategies have historically delivered strong outperformance over time while keeping the correlation with the benchmark very high.
Precious Metals stands out in Commodities
Our framework focuses on 4 characteristics, risk reduction, asymmetry of returns, diversification and valuation. Starting with drawdown protection in Figure 1, it is pretty clear that broad commodities and most commodities sectors are cyclical in nature. Enhanced Commodities fare better than traditional benchmark overall, but the standout defensive asset is precious metals and in particular Gold. In 5 out of the 6 drawdown periods, Gold performed positively, delivering 14.4% per year on average. To put this result in perspective, over those 6 periods, European equities have delivered -35.2%, Min Volatility equities -17.8%, Cash +2.8%, EUR Treasury AAA 8.4% and USD Treasury 11.3%2.
It is worth noting, however, that Energy can also deliver some downside protection when the equity downturn is the result of external shocks such as geopolitical uncertainties. In such, cases Energy and Oil, in particular, tend to react on the upside providing some protection aligned with Gold.

Looking further at the performance of Precious Metals in periods of drawdown we observe in figure 2 that over the 10 worst quarters for European equities in the last 20 years, Gold has 7 quarters of positive performance – a rate of 70%. On average gold outperformed equities by 19% in those quarters. Silver provides results that are more mixed despite outperforming equities by 14% on average. While over the full period commodities didn’t provide a positive return, in 8 of the 10 periods they outperformed equity markets by 8% on average proving that they are still a powerful diversifier. Enhanced Commodities fared even better outperforming equities by 9.6% on average per quarter.

Commodities a chief diversifier
In fact, the rolling 3Y correlation between commodities and equities remains consistently below 50% with long periods where it is nil or even negative. From a pure portfolio construction point of view, this is very exciting as it hands us a diversifying asset that can help reduce the overall volatility of the portfolio.

Gold, a precious tool to build defensive portfolios
From a more macroeconomic perspective and looking at Commodities performance across business cycles, it is again very clear that Precious Metals offer a protection in economic slowdown or recession. In Figure 3, we have split the last 20 years in 4 types of periods using the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) Composite Leading indicator (“CLI”). The CLI has been designed to decrease a few months before economy start to slow down or increase before the economy restarts. So, a strong decline in CLI tends to indicate a probable downturn in equity markets for example.

Enhanced Commodities behaved very well compared to front month commodities, cutting significantly the downside in negative economic environments and doing better in positive ones. It is worth noting as well the extent to which commodities and enhanced commodities perform when the economic signals are strong. This is linked to the well documented properties of commodities as an inflation hedge. Precious Metals exhibit a very strong and versatile profile driven mainly by gold.
It is interesting to note that Gold has outperformed very strongly in very negative or negative economic scenarios but also has done very well in periods of strong economic rebound, buoyed by its inflation hedge proprieties. This makes Gold a pretty asymmetric asset with strong positive performance in difficult economic periods but also good performance in strong rebound and when yields are expected to increase. Silver, similarly to palladium and platinum, offers also an interesting payoff, behaving part like a precious metal and part like an industrial metal. In periods where the economy is strong, it benefits from being used in the industry and behave more pro cyclically than gold. However, in economic downturn, it benefits from its status as a precious metal and delivers some protection.
This brings us to our fourth pillar in our framework: valuation. WisdomTree issued its quarterly outlook for Gold in January 2020, offering a number of scenarios fo the metal this year. In “Gold: how we value the precious metal”, we explain how we characterise gold’s past behaviour. Unlike other commodities where the balance of physical supply and demand influence the price, gold behaves more like a pseudo currency, driven by more macroeconomic variables like the interest rate environment, inflation, exchange rates and sentiment. Characterising gold’s past behaviour allows us to project where gold could go in the future (assuming it maintains consistent behaviour) using an internal model. In recent weeks, given the sharp rise in volatility of many asset markets and decisive action by a number of central banks across the globe, we are treading a path that looks like the bull case scenario presented our January 2020 outlooks. That scenario would see gold prices head over US$2000/oz by the end of the year. In that scenario, the Federal Reserve of the US embarks on policy easing (which has already started), that drives Treasury yields lower than where they were in December 2019 (Treasury yields have already broken new all-time lows of 0.35% on March 10th 2020). Inflation in that scenario is at an elevated 2.5% (which is in line with the January 2020 actual reading). Lastly, speculative positioning in gold futures markets remains elevated throughout the course of the year (at 350k contracts net long). In February 2020, we saw speculative positioning hit fresh highs (388k) and at the time of writing (10th March 2020), it remains above the 350k. We caution that if the current shock we are experiencing is temporary, we could get the recent interest rate cuts reversed, Treasury yields could rise to 2% and positing in gold futures could head back to more normal levels (closer to 120k). That was what we presented as a base case in January, where gold would end the year at US$1640/oz. So the downside from the levels ate the time of writing is somewhat limited (with gold trading at US$1650/oz at the time of writing) even if we end up in what was the base case.
This concludes our 6 weeks grand tour of the “natural” defensive assets among the main 4 asset classes. Next week we will start focusing on portfolio construction and on different ideas to design defensive and versatile portfolios.
Europe Equities is proxied by the STOXX Europe 600 net total return index. Broad Commodities (Commo) is proxied by the Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index. Enhanced Commodities is proxied by Optimized Roll Commodity Total Return Index. Energy is proxied by the Bloomberg Energy subindex Total Return Index. Precious Metals is proxied by the Bloomberg Precious Metals subindex Total Return Index. Industrial Metals is proxied by the Bloomberg Industrial Metals subindex Total Return Index. Livestock is proxied by the Bloomberg Livestock subindex Total Return Index. Softs is proxied by the Bloomberg Softs subindex Total Return Index. Grains is proxied by the Bloomberg Grains subindex Total Return Index. Gold is proxied by the LBMA Gold Price PM Index. Silver is proxied by the LBMA Silver Price index.
By: Pierre Debru, Director, Research
Source
1 WisdomTree, Bloomberg. In EUR.
2 WisdomTree, Bloomberg. In EUR. Europe Equities is proxied by the STOXX Europe 600 net total return index. Min Vol is proxied by MSCI World Min Volatility net total return index. Cash Euro is proxied by a series of daily compounded Eonia. EUR Treasury AAA is proxied by the Bloomberg Barclays EUR Aggregate Treasury AAA total return index. USD Treasury is proxied by the Bloomberg Barclays USD Treasury total return index.
Analys
Likely road ahead: a) Brent tumbles to low 50ies. b) OPEC+ steps in with cuts
Brent fell 2% yesterday to $62.49/b and is trading slightly lower this morning at $62.4/b. It is being pushed towards the 60-line by the booming amount of oil at sea. Oil at sea has increased by 2.5 million barrels every day since mid August and it keeps on moving higher. Last week it increased by 2.0 mb/d and stands at 1398 mb and the highest since Vortexa data in Bloomberg started in 2016. Higher than the previous peak in May 2020 when both Russia and Saudi Arabia had opened their taps on full throttle during that spring while global demand collapsed due to Covid-19.
The only reason why Brent crude hasn’t fallen faster and deeper is because of the US sanctions related to Rosneft and Lukoil which were announced on 22 October. Brent touched down to the 60-line only two days ahead of that announcement with almost all front-end backwardation in the Brent curve gone on 20 October. These new sanctions didn’t prevent Russian oil from coming onto water, but it added a lot of friction to the offtake of Russian crude oil. Brent crude bounced to $66.78/b just a few days after the sanctions were announced and the front-end backwardation strengthened again. Lots of oil at sea, and rising, but much of it hard to touch as they were Russian barrels.
But these sanctions are predominantly just friction. Russian crude keeps flowing into the global market and from there it gradually merges into the general stream of oil in the global market with ship to ship transferers and blending in pools of other oil. Frictions and delays, but it keeps flowing.
The global market has implicitly been running a surplus of 2.5 mb/d since mid-August. The easy read of the oil at sea from Vortexa is that the global oil market has been running a surplus of some 2.5 mb/d since mid-August and that the market keeps running a surplus of such magnitude.
The blob of oil at sea will eventually come on shore. Eventually the current huge blob of oil at sea will move onshore where the sensation of rising crude oil stocks will be more tangible and explicit.
Yet higher stock build in Q1 as global demand falls by 1.5 mb/d. Global demand in Q4 is usually weaker than in Q3 and Q1 demand is usually significantly weaker than Q4. Thus the rate of increase in oil at sea or oil in onshore stocks will likely be an even stronger force as we move into Q1-26 when global demand is about 1.5 mb/d lower than in Q4-25.
First price tumbles. The OPEC+ steps in with cuts. The rapid rise in crude stocks at sea or onshore is set to continue until OPEC+ says ”STOP”. The order of events is: a) The price tumbles into the low 50ies and then b) OPEC+ steps in with fresh cuts. Typically in that sequence.
And yes, we do expect OPEC+ to make adjustments and cutbacks in production when the Brent crude oil price tumbles to the low 50ies.
Crude oil at sea shooting higher at an average rate of 2.5 mb/d since mid-August and 2.0 mb/d last week. Increasingly pushing Brent crude lower but with friction and delay as much of the oil at sea is Russian or Iranian oil with sanctions attached.

Analys
Soon into the $50ies/b unless OPEC+ flips to production cuts
Brent crude fell 3.8% yesterday to $62.71/b. With that Brent has eradicated most of the gains it got when the US announced sanctions related to oil sales by Rosneft and Lukeoil on 22 October. Just before that it traded around $61/b and briefly touched $60.07/b. The US sanctions then distorted the reality of a global market in surplus. But reality has now reemerged. We never held much belief that 1) The sanctions would prevent Russian oil from flowing to the market via the dark fleet and diverse ship to ship transferee. Russia and the world has after all perfected this art since 2022. Extra friction in oil to market, yes, but no real hinderance. And 2) That Trump/US would really enforce these sanctions which won’t really kick in before 21 November. And post that date they will likely be rolled forward or discarded. So now we are almost back to where we were pre the US sanctions announcement.

OPEC revising (and admitting) that the global oil market was running a surplus of 0.5 mb/d in Q3-25 probably helped to drive Brent crude lower yesterday. The group has steadfastly promoted a view of very strong demand while IEA and EIA have estimated supply/demand surpluses. Given OPEC’s heavy role in the physical global oil market the group has gotten the benefit of the doubt of the market. I.e. the group probably knows what it is talking about given its massive physical presence in the global oil market. The global oil market has also gotten increasingly less transparent over the past years as non-OECD increasingly holds the dominant share of global consumption. And visibility there is low.
US EIA report: US liquids production keeps growing by 243 kb/d YoY in 2026. Brent = $55/b in 2026. The monthly energy report from the US energy department was neither a joy for oil prices yesterday. It estimated that total US hydrocarbon liquids production would grow by 243 kb/d YoY to 2026 to a total of 23.8 mb/d. It has upped its 2026 forecast from 23.4 mb/d in September to 23.6 mb/d in October and now 23.8 mb/d. For now prices are ticking lower while US EIA liquids production estimates keeps ticking higher. EIA expects Brent to average $55/b in 2026.
IEA OMR today. Call-on-OPEC 2026 at only 25.4 mb/d. I.e. OPEC needs to cut production by 3.7 mb/d if it wants to balance the market. The IEA estimated in its Monthly Oil Market Report that a balanced oil market in 2026 would require OPEC to produce only 25.4 mb/d. That is 3.7 mb/d less than the group’s production of 29.1 mb/d in October.
OPEC+ now has to make some hard choices. Will it choose market share or will it choose price? Since August there has been no further decline in US shale oil drilling rig count. It has instead ticked up 4 to now 414 rigs. A lower oil price is thus needed to drive US production lower and make room for OPEC+. Down in the 50ies we need to go for that to happen. We think that first into the 50ies. Then lower US oil rig count. Then lastly OPEC+ action to stabilize the market.
Analys
Trump’s China sanctions stance outweighs OPEC+ quota halt for Q1-26
Easing last week and lower this morning as Trump ”non-enforcement of sanctions towards China” carries more weight than halt in OPEC+ quotas in Q1-26. Brent crude calmed and fell back 1.3% to $65.07/b last week following the rally the week before when it touched down to $60.07/b before rising to a high of $66.78/b on the back of new US sanctions on Rosneft and Lukeoil. These new sanctions naturally affect the biggest buyers of Russian crude oil which are India and China. Trump said after his meeting last week with Xi Jinping that: ”we didn’t really discuss the oil”. China has stated explicitly that it opposes the new unilateral US sanctions with no basis in international law. There is thus no point for Trump to try to enforce the new sanctions versus China. The meeting last week showed that he didn’t even want to talk to Xi Jinping about it. Keeping these sanctions operational on 21 November onwards when they kick into force will be an embarrassment for Donald Trump. Come that date, China will likely explicitly defy the new US sanctions in yet another show of force versus the US.

Halt in OPEC+ quotas shows that 2026 won’t be a bloodbath for oil. Though still surplus in the cards. Brent crude started up 0.4% this morning on the news that OPEC+ will keep quotas unchanged in Q1-26 following another increase of 137k b/d in December. But following a brief jump it has fallen back and is now down slightly at $64.7/b. The halt in quotas for Q1-26 doesn’t do anything to projected surplus in Q1-26. So rising stocks and a pressure towards the downside for oil is still the main picture ahead. But it shows that OPEC+ hasn’t forgotten about the price. It still cares about price. It tells us that 2026 won’t be a bloodbath or graveyard for oil with an average Brent crude oil price of say $45/b. The year will be controlled by OPEC+ according to how it wants to play it in a balance between price and volume where the group is in a process of taking back market share.
Better beyond the 2026 weakness. Increasing comments in the market that the oil market it will be better later. After some slight pain and surplus in 2026. This is definitely what it looks like. The production forecast for non-OPEC+ production by the US EIA is basically sideways with no growth from September 2025. Thus beyond surplus 2026, this places OPEC+ in a very comfortable situation and with good market control.
US IEA October forecast for US liquids and non-OPEC+, non-US production. No net production growth outside of OPEC+ from September 2025 to end of 2026. OPEC+ is already in good position to control the market. It still want’s to take back some more market share. Thus still 2026 weakness.

-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanZenith Energy tar historiskt kliv, får klartecken för prospektering av Italiens största uranfyndigheter
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan2026 blir ett år med låga oljepriser, men om ett par år blir priserna högre
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedanTuff marknad för stål, SSAB hanterar situationen
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedanVenezuela har världens störta oljereserv, men producerar lite
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedanZenith Energy väcker Italiens uranarv till liv – ”Vi är egentligen redan i förproduktionsfas”
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedanDenison Mines stärker greppet om Athabasca, köper in sig i Skyharbours uranprojekt vid Russell Lake
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedanTyskland ska bygga 10 GW nya gaskraftverk
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanÖkad efterfrågan på olja och naturgas fram till 2050 enligt IEA

