Följ oss

Analys

Elpriset – Hur ser situation ut för nästkommande kvartal?

Publicerat

den

Modity Energy Trading - Energimarknaden

Bakgrundsdata

Bakgrundsdata på elpriset

Dagens situation och hydrobalans

Modity Energy Trading om elpriset

Vi har idag en hydrobalans (inkl. 10 dagars prognos) på ca -18 TWh. Skulle vi utgå från att hydrobalansen blir ca -15 TWh under Q1-14 så har vi två år bakom oss att titta på: 2009 och 2013. Båda dessa år var marginalkostnaden för kol något högre än prognoserna visar idag; ca €31/MWh mot dagens ca €28/MWh. Vi borde alltså, fundamentalt med dessa traditionella faktorer i bakgrunden, få något lägre priser i Q1-14 än vi hade under dessa två år. Terminspriset ligger idag dock ca €5/MWh högre än utfallet i Q1-09 och ca €1/MWh högre än utfallet i Q1-13. Vi hade under dessa år en mycket hög tillgänglighet på kärnkraft så för att det här ska stämma så måste också kärnkrafttillgängligheten ligga runt 90% under första kvartalet 2014. Vi har haft en del strul med kärnkraftkraften och nu har vi en tillgänglighet på drygt 80%, vi bör dock vara uppe i 90% när Ringhals 3 kommer in till november. Detta är dock en osäkerhet som bör speglas i priset vilket gör att det är rimligt att vi ligger lika eller till och med någon euro över utfallet Q1-09 , alltså som vi gör idag.

Om hydrobalansen försämras…

Sedan är det dock så att de senaste 5 åren så har hydroläget försämrats sedan v.44 hösten innan till kvartal 1 året efter, de flesta år med mellan 10-20 TWh. Trenden pekar alltså på att vi skulle få ett försämrat hydrologiskt läge till Q1-14. Detta skulle isåfall betyda att det finns fog för betydligt högre priser under Q1-14 än om vi tittar endast på nuvarande situation.

Skulle vi, efter en torr höst och start på vinter, landa på en hydrologisk balans runt -35 TWh under Q1-14 så hamnar vi i samma läge som vi hade år 2010 och 2011. Dessa år hade vi en marginalkostnad för kol på €34/MWh respektive €47/MWh, alltså betydligt högre än dagens €28/MWh. 2010 är väl isåfall det år som liknar nuvarande situation bäst då vi hade ett kolpris på ungefär samma nivå som idag men ett CO2 pris på ca €12/MWh. Detta år trodde man i oktober på ett spotpris under Q1 på ca €37/MWh men det blev hela €59,5/MWh! Tyskland (base) landade dock ca €18/MWh under vårt nordiska spotpris. Med vårt dåliga hydrologiska läge fick vi alltså importera kraft till tyska peaknivåer.

Sammanfattningsvis kan man alltså säga att Q1-14 verkar rimligt prissatt idag om det hydrologiska läget stannar på ca -15 TWh men att det finns en betydande uppsida om hydrologin försämras mot -30 TWh. Flera analytiker menar dessutom att vi kan räkna med att priserna i Tyskland under fler timmar än tidigare kan gå upp till marginalkostnaden för gas (ca €50-55/MWh och upp till €70/MWh för kortsiktig uppstart) då den är mer lättreglerad än kol vilket behövs när inte den förnybara kraften räcker till. Generellt så ser vi att spotpriserna i allt större utsträckning påverkas av sol- och vindförhållanderna på kontinenten. Vi har också frågan om CO2 där normalt €1/t uppgång i priset på utsläppsrätter påverkar det nordiska elpriset med ca €0,8/MWh.

Hydrobalans och NP-systempris - Diagram med utveckling

Hur ser då utsikterna ut?

Så hur ser det nu ut, vad är sannolikheten för att vi ska få en torr fortsättning på hösten och början på vintern? Lutar det åt en kall eller mild vinter? Kan vi se ökade CO2 priser redan innan årsskiftet? Det är naturligtvis omöjligt att sia om vädret så här tidigt men Georg Müller, meteorolog på Thomson Reuters Point Carbon, och flera med honom menar att vi nog kan få se en relativt mild och våt november medan december och januari troligen kommer bli mer åt det kalla och torra hållet. Vi ser inga tecken på en uppgång i bränslepriser under de närmaste två kvartalen och kärnkraftprognserna pekar på ca 90% tillgänglighet under vintern. Hur mycket vind och sol vi kommer se i Tyskland är tyvärr mycket svårt att ha en prognos på för så lång sikt. När det gäller CO2 så räknar man med att få ett beslut kring ”back-loading” av utsläppsrätter i slutet av året och det verkar i nuläget bli ett positivt utslag vilket troligen kommer få priserna att stiga ett par euro, alltså även här är risken på uppsidan. Vi räknar dock inte med något mer klargörande kring en mer långsiktig lösning på de låga CO2 priserna denna sida av årsskiftet.

Risker på nedsidan

Riskerna på nedsidan är att det blir en betydligt våtare höst/start på vinter än väntat och att hydroläget då förbättras till runt normalen. Då kan vi se lägre terminspriser på Q1-14, ev. ner till runt €40/MWh nivån. Trots att vi, när vi fundamentalt jämför oss med tidigare år, borde kunna ligga ytterligare något lägre så finns där en riskpremie för dålig tillgång på förnyelsebar kraft. Dåligt med vindkraft i Norden och vind– och solkraft på kontinenten skulle innebära tillfälliga importbehov där den reglerbara gaskraften är prissättande. När det gäller leverans så kan spotpriserna under Q1-14 dock mycket väl bli än lägre vid en hydrologi runt normalen, bra med kärnkraft och relativt milt väder. 2012 hade vi t.ex. ett genomsnittligt spotpris under jan-mars på €38,2/ MWh (i linje med dåvarande marginalkostnad på kol) trots ett underskott på -7 TWh. Vi hade då 85 % kärnkrafttillgänglighet i Sverige.

Kort slutsats

Hur sammanfattar vi då allt det här? Jo, vi anser i nuläget att riskerna på uppsidan för terminskontraktet Q1-14 är större än på nedsidan. Får vi se samma utveckling som flera tidigare år där hydrobalansen försämrats kraftigt fram till årsskiftet, prognoser pekar på en kall vinter och om dessutom kärnkraften skulle fortsätta strula kan vi mycket väl närma oss tyska peakpriser runt €50-55/MWh.

Författare: Mia Bodin

[box]Denna artikel om elpriset publiceras på Råvarumarknaden.se med tillstånd och i samarbete med Modity Energy Trading.[/box]

Ansvarsfriskrivning

Energimarknadskommentaren har producerats av Modity Energy Trading. Informationen är rapporterad i god tro och speglar de aktuella åsikterna hos medarbetarna, dessa kan ändras utan varsel. Modity Energy Trading tar inget ansvar för handlingar baserade på informationen.

Om Modity Energy Trading

Modity Energy Trading erbjuder energibolag och större företag den erfarenhet, kompetens och analysredskap som krävs för en trygg och effektiv förvaltning av energiportföljen. Modity bedriver handel med allt från el, gas och biobränslen till elcertifikat, valutor och utsläppsrätter. Företagets kunder får dessutom ta del av deras analysprodukter som t.ex det fullständiga marknadsbrevet med ytterligare kommentarer och prognoser. För ytterligare information se hemsidan.

Fortsätt läsa
Annons
Klicka för att kommentera

Skriv ett svar

Din e-postadress kommer inte publiceras. Obligatoriska fält är märkta *

Analys

Diesel concerns drags Brent lower but OPEC+ will still get the price it wants in Q3

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent rallied 2.5% last week on bullish inventories and bullish backdrop. Brent crude gained 2.5% last week with a close of the week of USD 89.5/b which also was the highest close of the week. The bullish drivers were: 1) Commercial crude and product stocks declined 3.8 m b versus a normal seasonal rise of 4.4 m b, 2) Solid gains in front-end Brent crude time-spreads indicating a tight crude market, and 3) A positive backdrop of a 2.7% gain in US S&P 500 index.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Brent falling back 1% on diesel concerns this morning. But positive backdrop may counter it later. This morning Brent crude is pulling back 0.9% to USD 88.7/b counter to the fact that the general backdrop is positive with a weaker USD, equity gains both in Asia and in European and US futures and not the least also positive gains in industrial metals with copper trading up 0.4% at USD 10 009/ton. This overall positive market backdrop clearly has the potential to reverse the initial bearish start of the week as we get a little further into the Monday trading session.

Diesel concerns at center stage. The bearish angle on oil this morning is weak diesel demand with diesel forward curves in front-end contango and predictions for lower refinery runs in response this down the road. I.e. that the current front-end strength in crude curves (elevated backwardation) reflecting a current tight crude market will dissipate in not too long due to likely lower refinery runs. 

But gasoline cracks have rallied. Diesel weakness is normal this time of year. Overall refining margin still strong. Lots of focus on weakness in diesel demand and cracks. But we need to remember that we saw the same weakness last spring in April and May before the diesel cracks rallied into the rest of the year. Diesel cracks are also very seasonal with natural winter-strength and likewise natural summer weakness. What matters for refineries is of course the overall refining margin reflecting demand for all products. Gasoline cracks have rallied to close to USD 24/b in ARA for the front-month contract. If we compute a proxy ARA refining margin consisting of 40% diesel, 40% gasoline and 20% bunkeroil we get a refining margin of USD 14/b which is way above the 2015-19 average of only USD 6.5/b. This does not take into account the now much higher costs to EU refineries of carbon prices and nat gas prices. So the picture is a little less rosy than what the USD 14/b may look like.

The Russia/Ukraine oil product shock has not yet fully dissipated. What stands out though is that the oil product shock from the Russian war on Ukraine has dissipated significantly, but it is still clearly there. Looking at below graphs on oil product cracks the Russian attack on Ukraine stands out like day and night in February 2022 and oil product markets have still not fully normalized.

Oil market gazing towards OPEC+ meeting in June. OPEC+ will adjust to get the price they want. Oil markets are increasingly gazing towards the OPEC+ meeting in June when the group will decide what to do with production in Q3-24. Our view is that the group will adjust production as needed to gain the oil price it wants which typically is USD 85/b or higher. This is probably also the general view in the market.

Change in US oil inventories was a bullish driver last week.

Change in US oil inventories was a bullish driver last week.
Source: SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data, US EIA

Crude oil time-spreads strengthened last week

Crude oil time-spreads strengthened last week
Source:  SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data

ICE gasoil forward curve has shifted from solid backwardation to front-end contango signaling diesel demand weakness. Leading to concerns for lower refinery runs and softer crude oil demand by refineries down the road.

ICE gasoil forward curve
Source: Blbrg

ARA gasoline crack has rallied towards while Gasoil crack has fallen back. Not a totally unusual pattern.

ARA gasoline crack has rallied towards while Gasoil crack has fallen back. Not a totally unusual pattern.
Source:  SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data

Proxy ARA refining margin with 40% gasoil crack, 40% gasoline crack and 20% bunker oil crack.

Proxy ARA refining margin with 40% gasoil crack, 40% gasoline crack and 20% bunker oil crack.
Source:  SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data

ARA diesel cracks saw the exact same pattern last year. Dipping low in April and May before rallying into the second half of the year. Diesel cracks have fallen back but are still clearly above normal levels both in spot and on the forward curve. I.e. the ”Russian diesel stress” hasn’t fully dissipated quite yet.

ARA diesel cracks
Source:  SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data

Net long specs fell back a little last week.

Net long specs fell back a little last week.
Source:  SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data

52-week ranking of net long speculative positions in Brent and WTI as well as 52-week ranking of the strength of the Brent 1-7 mth backwardation

52-week ranking of net long speculative positions in Brent and WTI as well as 52-week ranking of the strength of the Brent 1-7 mth backwardation
Source:  SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

’wait and see’ mode

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

So far this week, Brent Crude prices have strengthened by USD 1.3 per barrel since Monday’s opening. While macroeconomic concerns persist, they have somewhat abated, resulting in muted price reactions. Fundamentals predominantly influence global oil price developments at present. This week, we’ve observed highs of USD 89 per barrel yesterday morning and lows of USD 85.7 per barrel on Monday morning. Currently, Brent Crude is trading at a stable USD 88.3 per barrel, maintaining this level for the past 24 hours.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

Additionally, there has been no significant price reaction to Crude following yesterday’s US inventory report (see page 11 attached):

  • US commercial crude inventories (excluding SPR) decreased by 6.4 million barrels from the previous week, standing at 453.6 million barrels, roughly 3% below the five-year average for this time of year.
  • Total motor gasoline inventories decreased by 0.6 million barrels, approximately 4% below the five-year average.
  • Distillate (diesel) inventories increased by 1.6 million barrels but remain weak historically, about 7% below the five-year average.
  • Total commercial petroleum inventories (crude + products) decreased by 3.8 million barrels last week.

Regarding petroleum products, the overall build/withdrawal aligns with seasonal patterns, theoretically exerting limited effect on prices. However, the significant draw in commercial crude inventories counters the seasonality, surpassing market expectations and API figures released on Tuesday, indicating a draw of 3.2 million barrels (compared to Bloomberg consensus of +1.3 million). API numbers for products were more in line with the US DOE.

Against this backdrop, yesterday’s inventory report is bullish, theoretically exerting upward pressure on crude prices.

Yet, the current stability in prices may be attributed to reduced geopolitical risks, balanced against demand concerns. Markets are adopting a wait-and-see approach ahead of Q1 US GDP (today at 14:30) and the Fed’s preferred inflation measure, “core PCE prices” (tomorrow at 14:30). A stronger print could potentially dampen crude prices as market participants worry over the demand outlook.

Geopolitical “risk premiums” have decreased from last week, although concerns persist, highlighted by Ukraine’s strikes on two Russian oil depots in western Russia and Houthis’ claims of targeting shipping off the Yemeni coast yesterday.

With a relatively calmer geopolitical landscape, the market carefully evaluates data and fundamentals. While the supply picture appears clear, demand remains the predominant uncertainty that the market attempts to decode.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Also OPEC+ wants to get compensation for inflation

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent crude has fallen USD 3/b since the peak of Iran-Israel concerns last week. Still lots of talk about significant Mid-East risk premium in the current oil price. But OPEC+ is in no way anywhere close to loosing control of the oil market. Thus what will really matter is what OPEC+ decides to do in June with respect to production in Q3-24 and the market knows this very well. Saudi Arabia’s social cost-break-even is estimated at USD 100/b today. Also Saudi Arabia’s purse is hurt by 21% US inflation since Jan 2020. Saudi needs more money to make ends meet. Why shouldn’t they get a higher nominal pay as everyone else. Saudi will ask for it

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Brent is down USD 3/b vs. last week as the immediate risk for Iran-Israel has faded. But risk is far from over says experts. The Brent crude oil price has fallen 3% to now USD 87.3/b since it became clear that Israel was willing to restrain itself with only a muted counter attack versus Israel while Iran at the same time totally played down the counterattack by Israel. The hope now is of course that that was the end of it. The real fear has now receded for the scenario where Israeli and Iranian exchanges of rockets and drones would escalate to a point where also the US is dragged into it with Mid East oil supply being hurt in the end. Not everyone are as optimistic. Professor Meir Javedanfar who teaches Iranian-Israeli studies in Israel instead judges that ”this is just the beginning” and that they sooner or later will confront each other again according to NYT. While the the tension between Iran and Israel has faded significantly, the pain and anger spiraling out of destruction of Gaza will however close to guarantee that bombs and military strifes will take place left, right and center in the Middle East going forward.

Also OPEC+ wants to get paid. At the start of 2020 the 20 year inflation adjusted average Brent crude price stood at USD 76.6/b. If we keep the averaging period fixed and move forward till today that inflation adjusted average has risen to USD 92.5/b. So when OPEC looks in its purse and income stream it today needs a 21% higher oil price than in January 2020 in order to make ends meet and OPEC(+) is working hard to get it.

Much talk about Mid-East risk premium of USD 5-10-25/b. But OPEC+ is in control so why does it matter. There is much talk these days that there is a significant risk premium in Brent crude these days and that it could evaporate if the erratic state of the Middle East as well as Ukraine/Russia settles down. With the latest gains in US oil inventories one could maybe argue that there is a USD 5/b risk premium versus total US commercial crude and product inventories in the Brent crude oil price today. But what really matters for the oil price is what OPEC+ decides to do in June with respect to Q3-24 production. We are in no doubt that the group will steer this market to where they want it also in Q3-24. If there is a little bit too much oil in the market versus demand then they will trim supply accordingly.

Also OPEC+ wants to make ends meet. The 20-year real average Brent price from 2000 to 2019 stood at USD 76.6/b in Jan 2020. That same averaging period is today at USD 92.5/b in today’s money value. OPEC+ needs a higher nominal price to make ends meet and they will work hard to get it.

Price of brent crude
Source: SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data

Inflation adjusted Brent crude price versus total US commercial crude and product stocks. A bit above the regression line. Maybe USD 5/b risk premium. But type of inventories matter. Latest big gains were in Propane and Other oils and not so much in crude and products

Inflation adjusted Brent crude price versus total US commercial crude and product stocks.
Source:  SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data

Total US commercial crude and product stocks usually rise by 4-5 m b per week this time of year. Gains have been very strong lately, but mostly in Propane and Other oils

Total US commercial crude and product stocks usually rise by 4-5 m b per week this time of year. Gains have been very strong lately, but mostly in Propane and Other oils
Source:  SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data

Last week’s US inventory data. Big rise of 10 m b in commercial inventories. What really stands out is the big gains in Propane and Other oils

US inventory data
Source:  SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data

Take actual changes minus normal seasonal changes we find that US commercial crude and regular products like diesel, gasoline, jet and bunker oil actually fell 3 m b versus normal change. 

Take actual changes minus normal seasonal changes we find that US commercial crude and regular products like diesel, gasoline, jet and bunker oil actually fell 3 m b versus normal change.
Source:  SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data
Fortsätt läsa

Populära