Analys
Ingen tvärbroms på råvarornas supercykel

När Kina ställer om ekonomin till att drivas mer av inhemsk konsumtion lär det leda till både lägre tillväxttal och ändrad råvarukonsumtion. Betyder det att råvarornas så kallade supercykel är över? Både ja och nej.
Kina håller i snabb takt på att ställa om ekonomin från infrastrukturinvesteringar och export av lågförädlade varor som största drivkrafter, till en mer uthållig tillväxt driven av inhemsk konsumtion. Det kommer att leda till lägre tillväxttal framöver, och till en helt annan profil på Kinas råvarukonsumtion.
I det stora perspektivet kan omställningen av Kinas tillväxtmodell bara beskrivas som helt naturlig. Det är en utveckling som ska komma när människor får det bättre, blir bättre utbildade, ökar medvetenheten om miljöpåverkan och så vidare. Drivkraften hos invånarna skiftar: Från att arbeta maximalt för att kunna skicka hem pengar till anhöriga, arbetar de för att njuta mer av livet eller kunna leva lite mer västerländskt.
Men utvecklingen har också lett till resonemang runt att råvarornas så kallade ”supercykel” (se faktaruta), skapad av Kinas oerhörda tillväxt de senaste tio åren, är över. Det finns ett väldigt tydligt samband mellan å ena sidan hur nationer tar sig ur fattigdom och utvecklar en medelklass, och å andra sidan hur efterfrågan på råvaror ser ut. Förenklat kan man säga att industrialisering leder till stigande ekonomiskt välstånd som bygger på att en fysisk infrastruktur utvecklas, med allt från bostäder och vägar till fabriker, bilar, broar, järnvägar och flygplatser. I Kina har dessa infrastrukturprojekt antagit närmast ofattbara proportioner under de senaste två decennierna. Det har skapat en gigantisk efterfrågan på råvaror, som i sin tur lett till kraftiga prisökningar. Det mest framträdande exemplet är koppar som under de senaste tio åren stigit med 390 procent.
Kina har under de senaste tio åren gått från cirka 3 000 dollar i BNP per capita till strax under 10 000 dollar. Just det intervallet brukar vara den mest råvaruintensiva fasen i ett lands utveckling. Efter att BNP per capita överstigit 12 000 dollar planar råvarukonsumtionen normalt ut, och ändrar framför allt karaktär.
Det kan dock visa sig vara lite tidigt att dra slutsatser angående den kinesiska drakens aptit på de mer basala råvarorna såsom metaller och annat som behövs för infrastrukturbyggen. Kina är som bekant en gigantisk nation. Det är dessutom en nation med stora regionala skillnader. Detta gör att det kan vara vanskligt att använda samma analys som i andra, mindre länder. De regioner i Kina som nått längst i ”industrialiseringen” och som vid utgången av 2012 låg över 20 000 dollar i BNP per capita är Beijing och Shanghai, samt de regioner som ligger i dessa megastäders närhet. Det är dock viktigt att ha i åtanke att i dessa regioner bor ”endast” cirka 60 miljoner invånare. Tittar man på hur stor del av Kinas befolkning som ligger över 12 000 dollar i BNP per capita så landar summan på strax under en halv miljard invånare. Det är närmast ofattbart stora siffror.
Men – det betyder i sin tur att 850 miljoner människor, framför allt i inlandet, ligger kvar på väldigt låga nivåer när det gäller välstånd, utveckling och urbanisering. Det är 100 miljoner fler invånare än vad som bor i hela Europa (inklusive Ryssland). Dessa 850 miljoner har inte gjort den resa som den mer utvecklade delen av Kina gjort, och det är dit som en allt större del av tillverkning och ysselsättning nu flyttar.
Megastäderna har nämligen blivit väldigt dyra för arbetssökande att flytta till, och löneinflationen har varit mycket hög i de heta regionerna. Det skapar ett tryck att utveckla nya regioner inne i landet, och öka urbaniseringsgraden där. Och just urbanisering är inte bara väldigt en väldig drivkraft i efterfrågan på råvaror – det är också en av de starkaste trender vi ser i världen. Enligt FN:s prognoser kommer det redan år 2030 finnas 221 städer i Kina som är större än Stockholm, och det kommer att finnas 23 städer med fler än fem miljoner invånare.
Urbaniseringstakten är i princip lika hög var man än tittar i Asien, oavsett urbaniseringsgraden. Med andra ord finns det få anledningar att tro att urbaniseringen i Kina ska avstanna, även om landet nu nått en bit över 50 procents urbaniseringsgrad. Som jämförelse ligger motsvarande siffra i Japan runt 90 procent, och där fortsätter folk att flytta till städer. Liksom här i Sverige…
Biltätheten, som är intimt knuten till den ekonomiska aktiviteten, är också den ojämnt spridd mellan den utvecklade delen av landet och de delar som inte kommit lika långt. En växande bilflotta kommer inte bara att påverka förbrukningen av bensin och diesel – den kräver också fortsatta stora investeringar i infrastruktur som vägar, broar och tunnlar.
Kinas enorma storlek i sig gör alltså att nationella jämförelser blir svåra. Skillnaderna mellan olika provinser är väldigt stora och skillnaderna mellan stad och landsbygd är enorma. Det finns all anledning att tro att Kina kommer att ha väldigt stor påverkan på den globala råvaruefterfrågan under lång tid ännu. Därför måste vi svara både ja och nej på frågan om supercykeln är över: Ja, den är över för de utvecklade och industrialiserade regionerna. Men också nej: För en gigantisk del av befolkningen har den bara börjat.
Analys
Quadruple whammy! Brent crude down $13 in four days

Brent Crude prices continued their decline heading into the weekend. On Friday, the price fell another USD 4 per barrel, followed by a further USD 3 per barrel drop this morning. This means Brent crude oil prices have crashed by a whopping USD 13 per barrel (-21%) since last Wednesday high, marking a significant decline in just four trading days. As of now, Brent crude is trading at USD 62.8 per barrel, its lowest point since February 2021.

The market has faced a ”quadruple whammy”:
#1: U.S. Tariffs: On Wednesday, the U.S. unveiled its new package of individual tariffs. The market reacted swiftly, as Trump followed through on his promise to rebalance the U.S. trade position with the world. His primary objective is a more balanced trade environment, which, naturally, weakened Brent crude prices. The widespread imposition of strict tariffs is likely to fuel concerns about an economic slowdown, which would weaken global oil demand. This macroeconomic uncertainty, especially regarding tariffs, calls for caution about the pace of demand growth.
#2: OPEC+ hike: Shortly after, OPEC+ announced plans to raise production in May by 41,000 bpd, exceeding earlier expectations with a three-monthly increment. OPEC emphasized that strong market fundamentals and a positive outlook were behind the decision. However, the decision likely stemmed from frustration within the cartel, particularly after months of excess production from Kazakhstan and Iraq. Saudi Arabia’s Energy Minister seemed to have reached his limit, emphasizing that the larger-than-expected May output hike would only be a “prelude” if those countries didn’t improve their performance. From Saudi Arabia’s perspective, this signals: ”All comply, or we will drag down the price.”
#3: China’s retaliation: Last Friday, even though the Chinese market was closed, firm indications came from China on how it plans to handle the U.S. tariffs. China is clearly meeting force with force, imposing 34% tariffs on all U.S. goods. This move raises fears of an economic slowdown due to reduced global trade, which would consequently weaken global oil demand going forward.
#4: Saudi price cuts: At the start of this week, oil prices continued to drop after Saudi Arabia slashed its flagship crude price by the most in over two years. Saudi Arabia reduced the Arab Light OSP by USD 2.3 per barrel for Asia in May, while prices to Europe and the U.S. were also cut.
These four key factors have driven the massive price drop over the last four trading days. The overarching theme is the fear of weaker demand and stronger supply. The escalating trade war has raised concerns about a potential global recession, leading to weaker demand, compounded by the surprisingly large output hike from OPEC+.
That said, it’s worth questioning whether the market is underestimating the risk of a U.S.-Iran conflict this year.
U.S. military mobilization and Iran’s resistance to diplomacy have raised the risk of conflict. Efforts to neutralize the Houthis suggest a buildup toward potential strikes on Iran. The recent Liberation Day episode further underscores that economic fallout is not a constraint for Trump, and markets may be underestimating the threat of war in the Middle East.
With this backdrop, we continue to forecast USD 70 per barrel for this year (2025). For reference, Brent crude averaged USD 75 per barrel in Q1-2025.
Analys
Lowest since Dec 2021. Kazakhstan likely reason for OPEC+ surprise hike in May

Collapsing after Trump tariffs and large surprise production hike by OPEC+ in May. Brent crude collapsed yesterday following the shock of the Trump tariffs on April 2 and even more so due to the unexpected announcement from OPEC+ that they will lift production by 411 kb/d in May which is three times as much as expected. Brent fell 6.4% yesterday with a close of USD 70.14/b and traded to a low of USD 69.48/b within the day. This morning it is down another 2.7% to USD 68.2/b. That is below the recent low point in early March of USD 68.33/b. Thus, a new ”lowest since December 2021” today.

Kazakhstan seems to be the problem and the reason for the unexpected large hike by OPEC+ in May. Kazakhstan has consistently breached its production cap. In February it produced 1.83 mb/d crude and 2.12 mb/d including condensates. In March its production reached a new record of 2.17 mb/d. Its crude production cap however is 1.468 mb/d. In February it thus exceeded its production cap by 362 kb/d.
Those who comply are getting frustrated with those who don’t. Internal compliance is an important and difficult issue when OPEC+ is holding back production. The problem naturally grows the bigger the cuts are and the longer they last as impatience grows over time. The cuts have been large, and they have lasted for a long time. And now some cracks are appearing. But that does not mean they cannot be mended. And it does not imply either that the group is totally shifting strategy from Price to Volume. It is still a measured approach. Also, by lifting all caps across the voluntary cutters, Kazakhstan becomes less out of compliance. Thus, less cuts by Kazakhstan are needed in order to become compliant.
While not a shift from Price to Volume, the surprise hike in May is clearly a sign of weakness. The struggle over internal compliance has now led to a rupture in strategy and more production in May than what was previously planned and signaled to the market. It is thus natural to assign a higher production path from the group for 2025 than previously assumed. Do however remember how quickly the price war between Russia and Saudi Arabia ended in the spring of 2020.
Higher production by OPEC+ will be partially countered by lower production from Venezuela and Iran. The new sanctions towards Iran and Venezuela can to a large degree counter the production increase from OPEC+. But to what extent is still unclear.
Buy some oil calls. Bullish risks are never far away. Rising risks for US/Israeli attack on Iran? The US has increased its indirect attacks on Iran by fresh attacks on Syria and Yemen lately. The US has also escalated sanctions towards the country in an effort to force Iran into a new nuclear deal. The UK newspaper TheSun yesterday ran the following story: ”ON THE BRINK US & Iran war is ‘INEVITABLE’, France warns as Trump masses huge strike force with THIRD of America’s stealth bombers”. This is indeed a clear risk which would lead to significant losses of supply of oil in the Middle East and probably not just from Iran. So, buying some oil calls amid the current selloff is probably a prudent thing to do for oil consumers.
Brent crude is rejoining the US equity selloff by its recent collapse though for partially different reasons. New painful tariffs from Trump in combination with more oil from OPEC+ is not a great combination.

Analys
Tariffs deepen economic concerns – significantly weighing on crude oil prices

Brent crude prices initially maintained the gains from late March and traded sideways during the first two trading days in April. Yesterday evening, the price even reached its highest point since mid-February, touching USD 75.5 per barrel.
However, after the U.S. president addressed the public and unveiled his new package of individual tariffs, the market reacted accordingly. Overnight, Brent crude dropped by close to USD 4 per barrel, now trading at USD 71.6 per barrel.
Key takeaways from the speech include a baseline tariff rate of 10% for all countries. Additionally, individual reciprocal tariffs will be imposed on countries with which the U.S. has the largest trade deficits. Many Asian economies end up at the higher end of the scale, with China facing a significant 54% tariff. In contrast, many North and South American countries are at the lower end, with a 10% tariff rate. The EU stands at 20%, which, while not unexpected given earlier signals, is still disappointing, especially after Trump’s previous suggestion that there might be some easing.
Once again, Trump has followed through on his promise, making it clear that he is serious about rebalancing the U.S. trade position with the world. While some negotiation may still occur, the primary objective is to achieve a more balanced trade environment. A weaker U.S. dollar is likely to be an integral part of this solution.
Yet, as the flow of physical goods to the U.S. declines, the natural question arises: where will these goods go? The EU may be forced to raise tariffs on China, mirroring U.S. actions to protect its industries from an influx of discounted Chinese goods.
Initially, we will observe the effects in soft economic data, such as sentiment indices reflecting investor, industry, and consumer confidence, followed by drops in equity markets and, very likely, declining oil prices. This will eventually be followed by more tangible data showing reductions in employment, spending, investments, and overall economic activity.
Ref oil prices moving forward, we have recently adjusted our Brent crude price forecast. The widespread imposition of strict tariffs is expected to foster fears of an economic slowdown, potentially reducing oil demand. Macroeconomic uncertainty, particularly regarding tariffs, warrants caution regarding the pace of demand growth. Our updated forecast of USD 70 per barrel for 2025 and 2026, and USD 75 per barrel for 2027, reflects a more conservative outlook, influenced by stronger-than-expected U.S. supply, a more politically influenced OPEC+, and an increased focus on fragile demand.
___
US DOE data:
Last week, U.S. crude oil refinery inputs averaged 15.6 million barrels per day, a decrease of 192 thousand barrels per day from the previous week. Refineries operated at 86.0% of their total operable capacity during this period. Gasoline production increased slightly, averaging 9.3 million barrels per day, while distillate (diesel) production also rose, averaging 4.7 million barrels per day.
U.S. crude oil imports averaged 6.5 million barrels per day, up by 271 thousand barrels per day from the prior week. Over the past four weeks, imports averaged 5.9 million barrels per day, reflecting a 6.3% year-on-year decline compared to the same period last year.
The focus remains on U.S. crude and product inventories, which continue to impact short-term price dynamics in both WTI and Brent crude. Total commercial petroleum inventories (excl. SPR) increased by 5.4 million barrels, a modest build, yet insufficient to trigger significant price movements.
Commercial crude oil inventories (excl. SPR) rose by 6.2 million barrels, in line with the 6-million-barrel build forecasted by the API. With this latest increase, U.S. crude oil inventories now stand at 439.8 million barrels, which is 4% below the five-year average for this time of year.
Gasoline inventories decreased by 1.6 million barrels, exactly matching the API’s reported decline of 1.6 million barrels. Diesel inventories rose by 0.3 million barrels, which is close to the API’s forecast of an 11-thousand-barrel decrease. Diesel inventories are currently 6% below the five-year average.
Over the past four weeks, total products supplied, a proxy for U.S. demand, averaged 20.1 million barrels per day, a 1.2% decrease compared to the same period last year. Gasoline supplied averaged 8.8 million barrels per day, down 1.9% year-on-year. Diesel supplied averaged 3.8 million barrels per day, marking a 3.7% increase from the same period last year. Jet fuel demand also showed strength, rising 4.2% over the same four-week period.
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Ticking higher as tariff-panic eases. Demand growth and OPEC+ will be key
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude prices hold gains amid fresh tariff threats
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Ett samtal om råvarorna som behövs för batterier
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Tysklands SEFE skriver avtal om att köpa 1,5 miljarder ton LNG per år från Delfin i USA
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
700 timmar med negativa elpriser och dyrare biobränsle gav lägre resultat för Jämtkraft
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Danska Seaborg Technologies siktar på serieproduktion av smältsaltsreaktorer till mitten av 2030-talet
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Brent Edges Lower After Resisting Equity Slump – Sanctions, Saudi Pricing in Focus
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Oljepriserna slaktas på samtidiga negativa faktorer