Analys

Extremely tight platinum and palladium markets

Publicerat

12 år sedan

den

3 april, 2014

The South African platinum mining industry has been affected by strikes for more than ten weeks now. Because stocks are dwindling, the mining companies concerned are finding it increasingly difficult to fulfil their contractual delivery obligations. The situation as regards palladium is dominated by concerns about how Russia might react if the West were to impose further-reaching sanctions on the country. At the same time, demand on both markets is robust, driven by the automotive industry. The situation appears to be tightening noticeably, which in our opinion suggests that platinum and palladium prices will rise.

Platinum came under pressure from the weak gold price in March and declined noticeably as a result. For a time it dropped below the $1,400 per troy ounce mark to a six-week low. Palladium fared somewhat better and trended sideways while fluctuating significantly. For the first time since August 2011, it actually exceeded the $800 per troy ounce mark for a while, though it was unable to maintain this level (Chart 1). We believe that both precious metal prices are too low from a fundamental viewpoint given the risks to supply. In this Commodity Spotlight we will be assessing the supply situation in South Africa, the world’s biggest platinum producer and the world’s number two palladium producer, as well as taking a look at Russia, the biggest supplier of palladium.

Platinum price

According to figures from Johnson Matthey, South Africa produced 4.12 million ounces of platinum and 2.35 million ounces of palladium last year, thus accounting for 72% of global platinum mining production and 37% of global palladium mining production (Chart 2). Palladium is generally mined together with platinum. However, a strike has been underway in the South African platinum mining industry since 23 January. The radical AMCU (Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union) called its members out on strike to lend emphasis to its calls for wage hikes. The union, which was established in 1998 and formally registered in 2001, represents the majority of workers in the platinum mining industry and has meanwhile overtaken the more moderate union NUM (National Union of Mineworkers) in terms of membership. The world’s three biggest platinum producers are affected: Anglo American Platinum, Impala Platinum and Lonmin, 87% of whose workers are union members. Accounting for 66% of these, the AMCU predominates (Chart 3). Over 70,000 workers went out on strike when called upon to do so. The strike is the biggest to hit the South African mining sector since the Apartheid regime ended in 1994. 350,000 workers took to the streets in 1987 to protest for better working conditions, though this strike was brought to an end after around three weeks and cost the mining companies around ZAR 250 million at the time, according to the NUM.

AMCU and platinum

Union and companies still far apart

The AMCU is calling for producers to increase wages significantly, its core demand being that entry-level salaries be doubled to ZAR 12,500 per month. Originally, the AMCU urged the mining companies to meet its demands immediately, though it has meanwhile shown itself willing to “make some concessions”. AMCU has “eased” its core demand in two stages, with the result that it now wishes to see wages doubled within four years. For their part, the companies have offered staggered wage increases over the course of three years – 9% in the first year, 8% in the second and 7.5% in the third. In February, the rate of inflation in South Africa was 5.9%. In other words, the two parties still maintain positions that are very far apart. To date, the state mediator engaged to help (CCMA – Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration) has failed to bring the two parties any closer together. In fact, talks were actually suspended for a time because the mediator saw no possibility of agreement.

Politicians exercise restraint ahead of elections

So far, politicians have chosen not to intervene in the strike, clearly because of the upcoming elections in South Africa. Parliamentary elections will be held on 7 May, with presidential elections to follow in the second half of the year. The mine workers make up a major group of voters which neither the governing party ANC (African National Congress) nor the opposition parties wish to alienate. Polls indicate that the ANC is likely to win the elections, though it remains to be seen whether this will subsequently result in the necessary reforms being implemented which would also steer the mining industry into calmer waters. Recently, the South African finance minister played down the strike’s negative impact on the local economy, claiming that the current strike is causing less damage than the industrial actions taken two years ago. In 2012, a series of strikes cost gold and platinum producers more than ZAR 16 billion.

High revenue losses for companies and lost earnings for workers

By their own account, the mining companies concerned are losing 9,900 ounces of platinum production every day – 4,000 ounces at Anglo American Platinum, 2,800 ounces at Impala Platinum and 3,100 ounces at Lonmin. Assuming that work generally continues in the mines seven days a week, the producers have thus lost nearly 700,000 ounces of production since the beginning of the strike. The companies claim that they have lost revenues totalling over ZAR 11 billion as a result. So far, workers who are not being paid while they are out on strike have lost earnings of around ZAR 5 billion.

Company stocks dwindling

Although production has been at a standstill since the beginning of the strike, the companies have been able at least partly to fulfil their delivery obligations by drawing on stocks. By their own account, the producers had piled up considerable stocks in the run-up to the strike, which industrial sources estimated would last two months. The situation is not the same in all the companies, however. Anglo American Platinum had for example announced at the end of March that it had used up half of its 430,000 ounces of stocks up to that point, saying that material would be bought on the market if stocks ran out. By contrast, Impala Platinum had already declared “force majeure” in early March and has no longer been able to guarantee deliveries since the beginning of April. Impala is likewise considering buying in material on the market in order to meet its contractual obligations. Lonmin had also downwardly revised its sales forecasts for this year at an early stage.

Negative long-term impact cannot be excluded

Even if the strike can be brought to an end, it will take weeks if not months before platinum production achieves its pre-strike levels again. After all, the damage in shafts and galleries resulting from the lack of use first has to be identified and, most importantly of all, safety has to be restored. In some cases the companies are already talking about irreparable damage and are considering shutting down individual shafts entirely. There are also likely to be some redundancies because the companies claim that they will otherwise no longer be able to operate at a profit. This could spark renewed protests and set in motion a vicious circle which would harm the entire country.

Concers about supply outages in Russia

As far as palladium is concerned, we need to take a look at Russia. According to data from Johnson Matthey, Russia accounted for 42% of worldwide palladium supply in 2013 (primary production and reserve sales together totalling 2.7 million ounces) and for 14% of global platinum production (780,000 ounces), making the country the largest producer of palladium and the second-largest producer of platinum. The situation here is dominated by concerns about the extent to which possible sanctions imposed by the West on Russia could hit this sector and how Russia might react to further-reaching sanctions against its economy. That said, there are no signs so far that deliveries from Russia are at risk. According to the UK’s Financial Times, however, Norilsk Nickel, the world’s largest palladium producer, is currently negotiating longterm palladium and platinum supply contracts with Chinese and Japanese buyers. Although this might not mean anything, it could perhaps be viewed as a not particularly subtle hint to the West.

Robust demand from the automotive industry

Driven by the automotive industry, demand for both platinum and palladium is robust. March saw the seasonally adjusted annualized vehicle sales rate in the US rise to 16.33 million units, the highest figure since May 2007. At 3.16 million units, car sales in China in January and February combined were a good 11% up on the same period last year. It would therefore seem that the 2014 target of an increase in sales of up to 10%, set by the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, is achievable. The European auto industry may also have bottomed out, for car sales in February increased year-on-year for the sixth consecutive month (Chart 4).

New palladium ETF on the market

When it comes to investment demand, market participants evidently switched their allegiance from palladium to platinum in the first quarter. While the palladium ETFs tracked by Bloomberg recorded outflows of 51,900 ounces, the platinum ETFs saw inflows of 53,600 ounces. That said, the trend could soon be reversed in the case of palladium (Chart 5), for South African investment bank Absa Capital launched its long-awaited palladium ETF at the end of March. The ETF is listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange and solely sourced with palladium from South Africa. If the palladium ETF follows the same course as Absa Capital’s platinum ETF, which was launched at the end of April 2013, a great deal of supply could be stripped from the market. Within just four months of its launch, the platinum ETF became the world’s biggest platinum ETF and at the end of March had a market share of 37% with over 952,000 ounces. Holdings in all platinum ETFs combined are equivalent to more than five months of global mining production, while holdings in palladium ETFs equate to nearly four months of global production.

Higher prices expected during the course of the year

In our opinion, risks to supply in conjunction with robust demand point to higher platinum and palladium prices. According to data from Johnson Matthey, the supply-demand situation was already tight on both markets last year, the global platinum market showing a supply deficit of 605,000 ounces in 2013 and demand outstripping supply on the global palladium market by 740,000 ounces. Assuming the supply problems are not resolved in the near future and demand remains robust, the situation on both markets will doubtless tighten further. By year’s end we continue to envisage a platinum price of $1,600 per troy ounce, while palladium is likely to be trading at $825 per troy ounce.

Relaterade ämnen:commerzbank research palladium platinum

Nästa

SHB Råvarubrevet 4 april 2014

Missa inte

Orange juice: Will Brazil make up for the decline in US supply?

Fortsätt läsa

Annons

Analys

Oil market assigns limited risks to Iranian induced supply disruptions

Publicerat

1 vecka sedan

den

12 januari, 2026

Redaktionen

Falling back this morning. Brent crude traded from an intraday low of $59.75/b last Monday to an intraday high of $63.92/b on Friday and a close that day of $63.34/b. Driven higher by the rising riots in Iran. Brent is trading slightly lower this morning at $63.0/b.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Iranian riots and risk of supply disruption in the Middle East takes center stage. The Iranian public is rioting in response to rapidly falling living conditions. The current oppressive regime has been ruling the country for 46 years. The Iranian economy has rapidly deteriorated the latest years along with the mismanagement of the economy, a water crisis, encompassing corruption with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps at the center and with US sanctions on top. The public has had enough and is now rioting. SEB’s EM Strategist Erik Meyersson wrote the following on the Iranian situation yesterday: ”Iran is on the brink – but of what?” with one statement being ”…the regime seems to lack a comprehensive set of solutions to solve the socioeconomic problems”. That is of course bad news for the regime. What can it do? Erik’s takeaway is that it is an open question what this will lead to while also drawing up different possible scenarios.

Personally I fear that this may end very badly for the rioters. That the regime will use absolute force to quash the riots. Kill many, many more and arrest and torture anyone who still dare to protest. I do not have high hopes for a transition to another regime. I bet that Iranian’s telephone lines to its diverse group of autocratic friends currently are running red-hot with ”friendly” recommendations of how to quash the riots. This could easily become the ”Tiananmen Square” moment (1989) for the current Iranian regime.

The risks to the oil market are:

1) The current regime applies absolute force. The riots die out and oil production and exports continue as before. Continued US and EU sanctions with Iranian oil mostly going to China. No major loss of supply to the global market in total. Limited impact on oil prices. Current risk premium fades. Economically the Iranian regime continues to limp forward at a deteriorating path.

2) The regime applies absolute force as in 1), but the US intervenes kinetically. Escalation ensues in the Middle East to the point that oil exports out of the Strait of Hormuz are curbed. The price of oil shots above $150/b.

3) Riots spreads to affect Iranian oil production/exports. The current regime does not apply sufficient absolute force. Riots spreads further to affect oil production and export facilities with the result that the oil market loses some 1.5 mb/d to 2.0 mb/d of exports from Iran. Thereafter a messy aftermath regime wise.

Looking at the oil market today the Brent crude oil price is falling back 0.6% to $63/b. As such the oil market is assigning very low risk for scenario 2) and probably a very high probability for scenario 1).

Venezuela: Heavy sour crude and product prices falls sharply on prospect of reduced US sanctions on Venezuelan oil exports. The oil market take on Venezuela has quickly shifted from fear of losing what was left of its production and exports to instead expecting more heavy oil from Venezuela to be released into the market. Not at least easier access to Venezuelan heavy crude for USGC refineries. The US has started to partially lift sanctions on Venezuelan crude oil exports with the aim of releasing 30mn-50mn bl of Venezuelan crude from onshore and offshore stocks according to the US energy secretary Chris Wright. But a significant increase in oil production and exports is far away. It is estimated that it will take $10bn in capex spending every year for 10 years to drive its production up by 1.5 mb/d to a total of 2.5 mb/d. That is not moving the needle a lot for the US which has a total hydrocarbon liquids production today of 23.6 mb/d (2025 average). At the same time US oil majors are not all that eager to invest in Venezuela as they still hold tens of billions of dollars in claims against the nation from when it confiscated their assets in 2007. Prices for heavy crude in the USGC have however fallen sharply over the prospect of getting easier access to more heavy crude from Venezuela. The relative price of heavy sour crude products in Western Europe versus Brent crude have also fallen sharply into the new year.

Iran officially exported 1.75 mb/d of crude on average in 2025 falling sharply to 1.4 mb/d in December. But it also produces condensates. Probably in the magnitude of 0.5-0.6 mb/d. Total production of crude and condensates probably close to 3.9 mb/d.

The price of heavy, sour fuel oil has fallen sharply versus Brent crude the latest days in response to the prospect of more heavy sour crude from Venezuela.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

The oil market in 2026 will not be about Venezuela but about OPEC+ cutting or not

Publicerat

2 veckor sedan

den

5 januari, 2026

Redaktionen

Lower this morning as Rodriguez opens for US cooperation. Brent crude is down 1.4% to USD 69.95/b this morning. The acting president in Venezuela, Delcy Rodriguez, has struck a much more conciliatory tone and offered to cooperate with the US. This reduces the risk for an extended embargo on Venezuelan oil exports with oil potentially flowing freely out of Venezuela in not too long if Rodriguez actually do cooperate as the US whishes.

Venezuela is not a big oil producer today. It produced 960 kb/d in November. At the same time it consumes some 400 kb/d with net to the world exports of only 560 kb/d. Supply risk to the global oil market is thus very limited as it stands today.

Venezuela produced closer to 2.4 mb/d in 2015. But years of corruption plus US sanctions has eroded production capacity. Its oil infrastructure is worn down. Engineers who could get jobs in other countries have left.

What makes everyone lift their eyebrows over Venezuela with respect to oil is that it has the world’s largest oil reserves. The idea is that US capital coupled with Venezuelan oil reserves could lead to a major upturn in oil production. But it will require billions and billions of dollar and also time to drive production higher.

China has poured billions into infrastructure in Venezuela with most of it lost due to corruption. While Rodriguez now has opened for cooperation with the US, the corrupt regime under Maduro is probably still fully intact. It may not be all that safe for US oil majors to pour billions in capex into Venezuela.

Venezuela has the potential to produce significantly more oil. But lots of money and time to materialize it. Yes, it has the world’s largest oil reserves, but the world is full of oil reserves. The key question is thus more about where do you want to place your capex? What reserves will yield the greatest returns and the lowest risks versus corruption and geopolitics? Impressions from latest headlines is that US money is already knocking on the door in Venezuela, but it is too early to say whether such a dollar-flow will really materialize in the end or not.

The global oil market in 2026 will not be about Venezuela. It will be about OPEC+ balancing act between oil price and market share. Making cuts or not. The IEA projected in December that the world will only need 25.6 mb/d from OPEC in 2026 versus a production in November of 29.1 mb/d. If the IEA is correct then the OPEC will need to cut production by 3.5 mb/d to keep the oil market balanced.

Brent crude is at USD 69.95/b and OPEC+ confirmed this weekend that it will keep production unchanged in Q1-26. The consequence is that the oil price is heading lower by the week. We expect OPEC+ to shift from ”hold” to ”cut” as Brent crude moves to the low 50ies.

Venezuela crude oil production in mb/d

Production by OPEC versus what IEA projects is needed by the group in 2026.

Global observable oil inventory level according to the IEA in December.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Brent calendar 2026 on sale for $40.0/b (in 2008-dollar)

Publicerat

1 månad sedan

den

15 december, 2025

Redaktionen

A great bearish week last week for the world’s oil consumers. Brent fell 4.1% and closed the week at $61.12/b and not too far from the low of the week at $60.77/b. Continued Russia/Ukraine peace negotiations helped to keep a bearish tone in the market. Renewed bearish outlook for 2026 by the IEA which basically stated that if OPEC want a balanced market in2026 they’ll need to cut production by 3.5 mb/d from current level. On 10 December the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control issued an extension to 17. January of the deadline for compliance to the sanctions connected to Rosneft and Lukoil. The US essentially do not want any disruption to the flow of oil out of Russia. Further extensions again and again is likely with no real disruption to the flow of oil to markets. Except some friction.

The Brent 2026 is trading at $60.7/b at the moment. A great price for the consumers of the world. But not a lot of buying interest it seems. Though we do know that most of our consuming clients just love this price level. Thus on a general basis they’ll buy at this price any day. But outlooks for 2026 oil are of course very bearish (Ref IEA last week) and the general economic and political outlook for 2026 is a real headscratcher for most. So many consumers naturally sit back carefully waiting.

Brent 2026 at $60.7/b is only $40.0/b in 2008 dollar! But to get a sense of how cheap $60.7/b for Brent 2026 really is it is good to take a look at it in 2008-dollar for which the price is no more than $40/b! Of course the price is what it is and 2008 is a long time ago. But still we can’t help being amazed over how cheap it is. Due to incredible, continuous oil productivity since then of course as we wrote about in a recent note. To the joy for consumers and to the despair for OPEC.

Cheap oil and gas is a great vitamin injection for the world economy in 2026. But another aspect of cheap oil in 2026 is of course how incredibly positive it is for the global economy. This is juice and vitamins in bundles! Add in natural gas in the global LNG market which for 2026 is trading at only $53/boe! Down from around $72/boe on average in 2025 (and more than $200/boe in 2022). It will be the lowest cost level for natural gas for global LNG importers since 2021! Add in lower US interest rates and a yet softer USD as Trump gets control of the new Fed chair. This is all juice and steroids for the global economy. If the world also can start to reap productivity rewards from the utilization of AI then that is another positive. So solid economic growth and with it solid demand growth for oil and gas most likely.

Huge surplus in 2026? China will horde and OPEC+ will adjust. And what about the 3.5 mb/d which OPEC will have to cut to balance the market in 2026 according to the IEA? Well, China will likely continue to buy a lot of oil for strategic stock building as huge oil imports is one of its weakest geopolitical points. Building strategic reserves is also a good alternative to FX reserves now that US treasuries are not so much in favor by China and EM central banks. China has to buy something for its $1trn trade surplus and oil for strategic reserves is a natural and easy choice. And, OPEC(+) will cut a bit as well.

OPEC+ has already taken a half-turn as it has shifted from monthly increases to ”no change” in Q1-26. The next message will likely be ”cut”. One should possibly by oil forward before such a message hits the headlines. But of course, if OPEC+ sits back and closes its eyes and do no changes to its production, then the oil price will likely totally crash. We do however think that the group’s eyes are wide open.

OPEC production in mb/d versus IEA’s call-on-OPEC for 2026. To get a balanced market in 2026 the group needs to cut 3.5 mb/d from current level. But the group needs money too and not just market share.