Följ oss

Analys

Handelsbanken Jordbruk, 29 september 2014

Publicerat

den

Handelsbanken - Råvarubrevet - Nyhetsbrev om råvaror

Kvartalsrapport för råvaror från HandelsbankenSpecifikationer för kvarnvete MATIF

Hela hösten har det spekulerats vilt om huruvida det vete som handlas på börsen i Paris verkligen representerar ett kvarnvete eller ej. Osäkerheten grundar sig i att i börsens kravspecifikation för vete som går till leverans finns inget skrivet om falltal utan endast följande:

Rymdvikt 76 kg/hl, vattenhalt 15%, skadade kärnor 4%, grodda kärnor 2% och renhet 2%. Därtill regler om t.ex. mykotoxinnivå och europeiskt ursprung men alltså inget om falltal och inte heller protein. Dock står det att de företag som driver för leverans godkända silos kan applicera ytterligare och mer restriktiva krav – vilket de gör.

Ett av dessa företag är Senalia. De använder sig normalt, så även i år, av följande modell för prisjustering utifrån proteinhalt med bas 11%:

Prisjustering utifrån proteinhalt

skörden nådde detta krav. Ett så bra år finns inga skäl för Senalia att godkänna annat än vete med falltal över 220. I diskussion i helgen med Laurent Martel, chef för Senalia, sa Laurent att de främst sätter sina krav utifrån hur efterfrågan på exportmarknaden ser ut och att det viktigaste för honom är att upprätthålla omsättning – alltså ta in vete som lever upp till kundernas behov. Men Senalia är ett företag som tjänar sina pengar på lagring och omsättning av vete och vill således ha så mycket volym som möjligt, och justerar därför sina krav utifrån rådande marknadssituation – vilken påverkas inte bara av efterfrågan men även av utbudet.

I år håller det franska vetet överlag en klart sämre kvalitet, åtminstone vad gäller falltal – bara 46% av landets vete håller, enligt officiell statistik, ett falltal över 220. Och Senalia har i år också sänkt sina falltalskrav, till som lägst 170.

Vete

Förmodligen är inte exportmöjligheterna speciellt stora för vete med falltal 170 – stora köpare som Egypten kräver som lägst 200 och Algeriet vill ha vete med falltal lägst 230. Men genom att sänka kraven på vete för att mer motsvara utbudet i landet får Senalia lättare att upprätthålla volym. Och helt klart kommer de att försöka blanda in detta vete i partier med bättre kvalitet så att även delar av denna volym når exportmarknaden – vilket nog inte är en helt olönsam affär ett år som detta med stor prisskillnad mellan olika kvaliteter.

Det är också rimligt att anta att om leverans kan ske av MATIF-vete med falltal på 170 så lär ingen i år låta sina kontrakt gå till leverans om det vete de innehar är av bättre kvalitet. Såvida inte leverans av MATIF-vetet var förenat även med prisjustering för falltal – vilket det alltså inte verkar vara idag. Så var det åtminstone år 1989 med prisavdrag på 1/1000 per sekund med maximalt 15 sekunder i avvikelse.

MATIF-vetet bör alltså idag rimligen prisas som ett vete med, förutom övriga kriterier, ett falltal på 170. På vissa marknader anses detta vara mer ett fodervete men på den franska kvarnmarknaden ses även detta vete som ett kvarnvete. Om än inte av bästa kvalitet men det duger för landets kvarnindustris generellt sett relativt låga krav med stor produktion av mjöl till kakor och baguetter. Svaret på den inledande frågan är alltså enligt vår uppfattning att MATIF-vetet representerar franskt kvarnvete, förutom övriga kriterier, när det är som sämst falltalsmässigt – vilket i år alltså är sämre än t.ex. förra året och normalåret.

Den stora frågan är sen om priset på MATIF-vetet idag är prisat rätt utifrån ett vete med falltal på 170? Fysiska priser i Frankrike noteras kring EUR 140 per ton för ren fodervete och kvarnvete med falltal 220 kring dryga EUR 160 per ton. MATIF-vetet handlas idag ganska så exakt i mitten av dessa två – vilket som vi uppfattar MATIF-vetet inte känns helt orimligt. Märk dock att detta gäller terminer för årets skörd. Vid prisande av terminer kopplade till 2015 års skörd bör marknaden rimligen anta en återgång till en mer normal fransk veteproduktion med högre falltal och en situation där Senalia inte godkänner falltal på 170 – dessa terminer handlas också till ett klart högre pris.

Framtida förändringar?

Börsen, Euronext, säger sig överväga framtida tillägg i kravspecifikationer framöver – vilket dock så fall får verkan först på kontrakt med förfall efter maj 2017 då ändringar inte kan göras i kontrakt med öppna positioner. Kanske vore ändå en modell där de mottagande siloföretagen inför prisjusteringar utifrån falltalsnivå och rådande marknadsläge för året i Frankrike, eller ännu hellre Europa med fler leveranspunkter, att föredra – där MATIF-vetet i grunden är ett kvarnvete med falltal 220 men där prisjustering nedåt sker utifrån fastställd skala under onormala år med sänkta falltalskrav som 2014.

[box]Handelsbanken Jordbruk är producerat av Handelsbanken och publiceras i samarbete och med tillstånd på Råvarumarknaden.se[/box]

Ansvarsbegränsning

Detta material är producerat av Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ) i fortsättningen kallad Handelsbanken. De som arbetar med innehållet är inte analytiker och materialet är inte oberoende investeringsanalys. Innehållet är uteslutande avsett för kunder i Sverige. Syftet är att ge en allmän information till Handelsbankens kunder och utgör inte ett personligt investeringsråd eller en personlig rekommendation. Informationen ska inte ensamt utgöra underlag för investeringsbeslut. Kunder bör inhämta råd från sina rådgivare och basera sina investeringsbeslut utifrån egen erfarenhet.

Informationen i materialet kan ändras och också avvika från de åsikter som uttrycks i oberoende investeringsanalyser från Handelsbanken. Informationen grundar sig på allmänt tillgänglig information och är hämtad från källor som bedöms som tillförlitliga, men riktigheten kan inte garanteras och informationen kan vara ofullständig eller nedkortad. Ingen del av förslaget får reproduceras eller distribueras till någon annan person utan att Handelsbanken dessförinnan lämnat sitt skriftliga medgivande. Handelsbanken ansvarar inte för att materialet används på ett sätt som strider mot förbudet mot vidarebefordran eller offentliggörs i strid med bankens regler.

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Analys

Quadruple whammy! Brent crude down $13 in four days

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent Crude prices continued their decline heading into the weekend. On Friday, the price fell another USD 4 per barrel, followed by a further USD 3 per barrel drop this morning. This means Brent crude oil prices have crashed by a whopping USD 13 per barrel (-21%) since last Wednesday high, marking a significant decline in just four trading days. As of now, Brent crude is trading at USD 62.8 per barrel, its lowest point since February 2021.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

The market has faced a ”quadruple whammy”:

#1: U.S. Tariffs: On Wednesday, the U.S. unveiled its new package of individual tariffs. The market reacted swiftly, as Trump followed through on his promise to rebalance the U.S. trade position with the world. His primary objective is a more balanced trade environment, which, naturally, weakened Brent crude prices. The widespread imposition of strict tariffs is likely to fuel concerns about an economic slowdown, which would weaken global oil demand. This macroeconomic uncertainty, especially regarding tariffs, calls for caution about the pace of demand growth.

#2: OPEC+ hike: Shortly after, OPEC+ announced plans to raise production in May by 41,000 bpd, exceeding earlier expectations with a three-monthly increment. OPEC emphasized that strong market fundamentals and a positive outlook were behind the decision. However, the decision likely stemmed from frustration within the cartel, particularly after months of excess production from Kazakhstan and Iraq. Saudi Arabia’s Energy Minister seemed to have reached his limit, emphasizing that the larger-than-expected May output hike would only be a “prelude” if those countries didn’t improve their performance. From Saudi Arabia’s perspective, this signals: ”All comply, or we will drag down the price.”

#3: China’s retaliation: Last Friday, even though the Chinese market was closed, firm indications came from China on how it plans to handle the U.S. tariffs. China is clearly meeting force with force, imposing 34% tariffs on all U.S. goods. This move raises fears of an economic slowdown due to reduced global trade, which would consequently weaken global oil demand going forward.

#4: Saudi price cuts: At the start of this week, oil prices continued to drop after Saudi Arabia slashed its flagship crude price by the most in over two years. Saudi Arabia reduced the Arab Light OSP by USD 2.3 per barrel for Asia in May, while prices to Europe and the U.S. were also cut.

These four key factors have driven the massive price drop over the last four trading days. The overarching theme is the fear of weaker demand and stronger supply. The escalating trade war has raised concerns about a potential global recession, leading to weaker demand, compounded by the surprisingly large output hike from OPEC+.

That said, it’s worth questioning whether the market is underestimating the risk of a U.S.-Iran conflict this year.

U.S. military mobilization and Iran’s resistance to diplomacy have raised the risk of conflict. Efforts to neutralize the Houthis suggest a buildup toward potential strikes on Iran. The recent Liberation Day episode further underscores that economic fallout is not a constraint for Trump, and markets may be underestimating the threat of war in the Middle East.

With this backdrop, we continue to forecast USD 70 per barrel for this year (2025). For reference, Brent crude averaged USD 75 per barrel in Q1-2025.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Lowest since Dec 2021. Kazakhstan likely reason for OPEC+ surprise hike in May

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Collapsing after Trump tariffs and large surprise production hike by OPEC+ in May. Brent crude collapsed yesterday following the shock of the Trump tariffs on April 2 and even more so due to the unexpected announcement from OPEC+ that they will lift production by 411 kb/d in May which is three times as much as expected. Brent fell 6.4% yesterday with a close of USD 70.14/b and traded to a low of USD 69.48/b within the day. This morning it is down another 2.7% to USD 68.2/b. That is below the recent low point in early March of USD 68.33/b. Thus, a new ”lowest since December 2021” today.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Kazakhstan seems to be the problem and the reason for the unexpected large hike by OPEC+ in May. Kazakhstan has consistently breached its production cap. In February it produced 1.83 mb/d crude and 2.12 mb/d including condensates. In March its production reached a new record of 2.17 mb/d. Its crude production cap however is 1.468 mb/d. In February it thus exceeded its production cap by 362 kb/d.

Those who comply are getting frustrated with those who don’t. Internal compliance is an important and difficult issue when OPEC+ is holding back production. The problem naturally grows the bigger the cuts are and the longer they last as impatience grows over time. The cuts have been large, and they have lasted for a long time. And now some cracks are appearing. But that does not mean they cannot be mended. And it does not imply either that the group is totally shifting strategy from Price to Volume. It is still a measured approach. Also, by lifting all caps across the voluntary cutters, Kazakhstan becomes less out of compliance. Thus, less cuts by Kazakhstan are needed in order to become compliant.

While not a shift from Price to Volume, the surprise hike in May is clearly a sign of weakness. The struggle over internal compliance has now led to a rupture in strategy and more production in May than what was previously planned and signaled to the market. It is thus natural to assign a higher production path from the group for 2025 than previously assumed. Do however remember how quickly the price war between Russia and Saudi Arabia ended in the spring of 2020.

Higher production by OPEC+ will be partially countered by lower production from Venezuela and Iran. The new sanctions towards Iran and Venezuela can to a large degree counter the production increase from OPEC+. But to what extent is still unclear.

Buy some oil calls. Bullish risks are never far away. Rising risks for US/Israeli attack on Iran? The US has increased its indirect attacks on Iran by fresh attacks on Syria and Yemen lately. The US has also escalated sanctions towards the country in an effort to force Iran into a new nuclear deal. The UK newspaper TheSun yesterday ran the following story: ON THE BRINK US & Iran war is ‘INEVITABLE’, France warns as Trump masses huge strike force with THIRD of America’s stealth bombers”. This is indeed a clear risk which would lead to significant losses of supply of oil in the Middle East and probably not just from Iran. So, buying some oil calls amid the current selloff is probably a prudent thing to do for oil consumers.

Brent crude is rejoining the US equity selloff by its recent collapse though for partially different reasons. New painful tariffs from Trump in combination with more oil from OPEC+ is not a great combination.

Brent crude is rejoining the US equity selloff by its recent collapse though for partially different reasons.
Source: SEB selection and highlights, Bloomberg graph and data
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Tariffs deepen economic concerns – significantly weighing on crude oil prices

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent crude prices initially maintained the gains from late March and traded sideways during the first two trading days in April. Yesterday evening, the price even reached its highest point since mid-February, touching USD 75.5 per barrel.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

However, after the U.S. president addressed the public and unveiled his new package of individual tariffs, the market reacted accordingly. Overnight, Brent crude dropped by close to USD 4 per barrel, now trading at USD 71.6 per barrel.

Key takeaways from the speech include a baseline tariff rate of 10% for all countries. Additionally, individual reciprocal tariffs will be imposed on countries with which the U.S. has the largest trade deficits. Many Asian economies end up at the higher end of the scale, with China facing a significant 54% tariff. In contrast, many North and South American countries are at the lower end, with a 10% tariff rate. The EU stands at 20%, which, while not unexpected given earlier signals, is still disappointing, especially after Trump’s previous suggestion that there might be some easing.

Once again, Trump has followed through on his promise, making it clear that he is serious about rebalancing the U.S. trade position with the world. While some negotiation may still occur, the primary objective is to achieve a more balanced trade environment. A weaker U.S. dollar is likely to be an integral part of this solution.

Yet, as the flow of physical goods to the U.S. declines, the natural question arises: where will these goods go? The EU may be forced to raise tariffs on China, mirroring U.S. actions to protect its industries from an influx of discounted Chinese goods.

Initially, we will observe the effects in soft economic data, such as sentiment indices reflecting investor, industry, and consumer confidence, followed by drops in equity markets and, very likely, declining oil prices. This will eventually be followed by more tangible data showing reductions in employment, spending, investments, and overall economic activity.

Ref oil prices moving forward, we have recently adjusted our Brent crude price forecast. The widespread imposition of strict tariffs is expected to foster fears of an economic slowdown, potentially reducing oil demand. Macroeconomic uncertainty, particularly regarding tariffs, warrants caution regarding the pace of demand growth. Our updated forecast of USD 70 per barrel for 2025 and 2026, and USD 75 per barrel for 2027, reflects a more conservative outlook, influenced by stronger-than-expected U.S. supply, a more politically influenced OPEC+, and an increased focus on fragile demand.

___

US DOE data:

Last week, U.S. crude oil refinery inputs averaged 15.6 million barrels per day, a decrease of 192 thousand barrels per day from the previous week. Refineries operated at 86.0% of their total operable capacity during this period. Gasoline production increased slightly, averaging 9.3 million barrels per day, while distillate (diesel) production also rose, averaging 4.7 million barrels per day.

U.S. crude oil imports averaged 6.5 million barrels per day, up by 271 thousand barrels per day from the prior week. Over the past four weeks, imports averaged 5.9 million barrels per day, reflecting a 6.3% year-on-year decline compared to the same period last year.

The focus remains on U.S. crude and product inventories, which continue to impact short-term price dynamics in both WTI and Brent crude. Total commercial petroleum inventories (excl. SPR) increased by 5.4 million barrels, a modest build, yet insufficient to trigger significant price movements.

Commercial crude oil inventories (excl. SPR) rose by 6.2 million barrels, in line with the 6-million-barrel build forecasted by the API. With this latest increase, U.S. crude oil inventories now stand at 439.8 million barrels, which is 4% below the five-year average for this time of year.

Gasoline inventories decreased by 1.6 million barrels, exactly matching the API’s reported decline of 1.6 million barrels. Diesel inventories rose by 0.3 million barrels, which is close to the API’s forecast of an 11-thousand-barrel decrease. Diesel inventories are currently 6% below the five-year average.

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Over the past four weeks, total products supplied, a proxy for U.S. demand, averaged 20.1 million barrels per day, a 1.2% decrease compared to the same period last year. Gasoline supplied averaged 8.8 million barrels per day, down 1.9% year-on-year. Diesel supplied averaged 3.8 million barrels per day, marking a 3.7% increase from the same period last year. Jet fuel demand also showed strength, rising 4.2% over the same four-week period.

USD DOE invetories
US crude inventories
Fortsätt läsa

Centaur

Guldcentralen

Fokus

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Populära