Följ oss

Analys

Going green? The unexpected investments helping to reduce vehicle emissions

Publicerat

den

WisdomTree
WisdomTree

Globally about 15% of the world’s Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions come from the transportation sector. Despite improving fuel efficiency in cars over the past seven decades, the fact that more people in the world use cars means that global emissions from the transport sector continue to rise. However, pollution abatement equipment can help reduce emissions from cars. Autocatalysts are a key technology in this regard. 

Platinum and palladium in autocatalysts 

Nitesh Shah, Director, Research, WisdomTree
Nitesh Shah, Director, Research, WisdomTree

An autocatalyst is a device installed in internal combustion engine cars that converts harmful pollutants into safer gases. Platinum group metals (PGM) including platinum, palladium and rhodium are key ingredients in the autocatalysts that generate this chemical conversion. Autocatalysts were first introduced in the mid-1970s and today, are used in almost all internal combustion engine vehicles (including hybrid vehicles). In addition, fuel cell vehicles also use platinum (not palladium or rhodium) as the main catalyst in the reactions to produce electricity and water from hydrogen fuel and water. 

How important are autocatalysts for PGM demand?   

In 2019, automobiles accounted for 34% of platinum demand and 84% of palladium demand. So, the auto industry is the key driver of demand for both platinum and palladium.  

Vehicle sales versus regulation 

Tightening emission regulations generally increases the demand for the platinum group metals. Demand for platinum group metals will also vary with the volume of vehicle sales. Historically it has been emission regulation that has had a greater influence on demand. According to World Platinum Investment Council’s calculations, global vehicle sales between 1990 and 2019 rose by 1.6 times whereas the combined demand for platinum, palladium and rhodium in cars rose by 6.2 times. The fact that the rise in automobile platinum group metal demand was more than the increase in car sales indicates that higher loadings have been the chief driver of demand growth. Emission regulations are continuing to tighten globally for both passenger and commercial vehicles. 

Gasoline vs. diesel cars 

Today, there are higher loadings of palladium in gasoline autocatalysts and higher loadings of platinum in diesel autocatalysts. However, both autocatalysts carry some loadings of each metal. The catalytic efficiency of each metal is influenced by engine temperature, fuel type, all fuel quality and durability of the autocatalyst’s washcoat. Diesel engines operate at lower temperatures than gasoline engines and run with a leaner gas stream containing lots of oxygen. Under these conditions, platinum is a more active catalyst for the conversion of carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrocarbons (HC) to harmless emissions. However, the addition of some palladium to the platinum catalyst can improve its thermal stability. This is an advantage when reducing diesel particulate matter from the exhaust. This process involves trapping the particulate matter in a filter and then raising the temperature of the system to oxidise the matter to CO2. At these higher temperatures, palladium improves the thermal durability of the catalyst, helping it perform optimally for the lifetime of the vehicle. 

Diesel cars falling out of favour 

Europe is the largest diesel passenger car market in the world. In most of the rest of the world, gasoline cars dominate. However, even in Europe, diesel cars have fallen out of favour following ‘Dieselgate’ and tightening particulate emissions standards across Europe, where diesel cars do not perform as well as their gasoline equivalents (see figure 01 below).

New passenger cars by fuel type in the European Union
Source: European Automobile Manufacturers Association. Data as of September 2020.

Platinum versus palladium price 

In 2010, platinum used to trade close to 3 times the price of palladium. Dieselgate accelerated the trend of rising palladium relative to platinum prices. Today, platinum trades below half the price of palladium. Palladium’s growing demand and tightening supply have been a boon for prices (see figure 02 below).

Source: Bloomberg. Data from 01 September 2010 to 01 September 2020.

Economical to substitute? 

With such a wide price differential between platinum and palladium, it’s a natural question to ask if platinum can be substituted for palladium? Industry experts including Johnson Matthey, believe there is some limited scope for substitution. Not necessarily in gasoline cars but more in terms of substituting out palladium in diesel cars with higher loadings of platinum. However, auto manufacturers are notoriously secretive about their technologies which makes it difficult to comment on what scale this will occur. In addition, it is rumoured that auto manufacturers are using their scarce engineers to develop electric vehicles and so auto manufacturers are averse to divert them to PGM substitution projects. 

Trucking industry 

While globally more passenger cars use gasoline than diesel, trucks generally use more diesel. Emission standards for trucks are tightening. Notably in India the government has tightened regulations to broadly match European standards in 20205. China will implement similar standards phased between 2021 and 2023. This is likely to be a strong catalyst for platinum demand. 

Car sales in COVID-19 era 

Passenger car sales had fallen hard during the COVID-19 pandemic, but as lockdown conditions ease, car sales appear to be rebounding strongly in China, Europe, and US (see figure 03 below). China and US are predominantly gasoline markets so the rebound in sales there mainly helps boost palladium prices. The rebound in European car sales should also help platinum prices.

New passenger car registrations
Source: WisdomTree, Bloomberg. Data to 31 July 2020.

The concentration in supply 

Supply in both platinum and palladium is highly concentrated. South Africa accounts for nearly 70% of platinum’s global supply while South Africa and Russia collectively provide around 70% of palladium supply globally. While platinum is expected to be in a slight supply surplus this year, palladium continues to be in an acute supply deficit with demand continuing to grow and supply relatively stable.  

Conclusions 

Both platinum and palladium are important materials for pollution abatement technology in cars. Platinum, which has been heavily utilised in diesel passenger cars, has fallen out of favour in recent years. However, with tightening regulations for commercial vehicles globally we are likely to see that demand rise. Palladium, which has seen growing demand and is in a supply deficit is likely to see constructive fundamentals for years to come.

Fortsätt läsa
Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Analys

Buy Brent Dec-2026 calls with strike $150/b!

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Closing at highest since Aug 2022. Brent crude gained 9.2% yesterday. The trading range was limited to $95.2 – 101.85/b with a close at $100.46/b and higher than the Monday close of $98.96/b. Ydy close was the highest close since August 2022. This morning Brent is up 2% to $102.4/b and is trading at the highest intraday level since Monday when it high an intraday high of $119.5/b.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

A military hit at Iran’s Kharg island would be a big, big bang for the oil price. The big, big risk for the weekend is that oil infrastructure could be damaged. For example Iran’s Kharg island which is Iran’s major oil export hub. If damaged we would have a longer lasting loss of supply stretching way beyond Trump’s announced ”two more weeks”. It will make the spot price spike higher and it will lift the curve. Brent crude 2027 swap would jump above $80/b immediately. An attack on Kharg island would naturally lead Iran to strike back at other oil infrastructures in the Gulf. Especially those belonging to countries who harbor US military bases. I.e. countries who essentially are supporting the attack by US and Israel towards Iran. Though if not in spirit, then in practical operational terms. An attack on Kharg island would not just lead to a lasting outage of supply from Iran until it would be repaired. It would immediately endanger other oil infrastructure in the region as well and additional lasting loss of supply.

No one in their right mind would dare to sit short oil over the coming weekend. Oil is thus set to close the week at a very strong note today. 

Prepare for another 400 mb SPR release next week. This week’s announcement of a 400 mb release from Strategic Oil Reserves totally underwhelmed the market with the oil price going higher rather than lower following the announcement. For one it means that the market expects the war and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz to last longer than Trump’s recent announced ”two more weeks”. 400 mb only amounts to 20 days of lost supply to the world through Hormuz and we are already at day 14. So next week when we are getting close to the 20 day mark, we are likely to see another announcement of another 400 mb release of SPR stocks to the market. Preparing for the next 20 days of war. 

Global oil logistics in total disarray. We have previously addressed the issue of the huge logistical web of the global oil market which is now in total disarray. The logistical disruption started to fry the oil market at the end of last week. Helped to spike the oil market on Monday. What we hear from our shipping clients is that the problems with supply of fuels locally in Korea, Singapore, India and Africa are getting worse with physical availability of fuels there drying up. It is getting increasingly difficult to find physical supply of bunker oil with local, physical prices shooting way higher than financial benchmarks. To the point that biofuels have become the cheap option many places. Availability of fuels in the US is still good. Not so surprising as the US is self-sufficient with crude and refineries. 

The disruption in global oil logistics doesn’t seem to improve. Rather the opposite. If you cannot get fuel to run your ships, then how can you distribute fuels to where it is needed.

Buy Brent Dec-2026 calls with strike $150/b!! As the days goes by the oil price is ticking higher while Trump is getting one day closer to US midterm elections. Trump was betting that he could put this war to bead well before November. But that will probably not be up to him to decide. It will be up to Iran to decide when to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. It is very hard to imagine that Iran will let Trump easily off the hock after he has killed its Supreme Leader. This will likely go all the way to November. Buy Brent Dec-2026 calls with strike $150/b!!

Brent closed at highest since 2022 ydy. Will end this Friday at a very strong note! Consumers still dreaming of $60/b oil

Brent closed at highest since 2022 ydy. Will end this Friday at a very strong note! Consumers still dreaming of $60/b oil
Source: Bloomberg
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Brent near USD 100 again(!)… SPR headlines cannot replace Hormuz flows

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent crude is trading higher overnight, up roughly USD 4.5/bl from yesterday’s close. That said, prices were at one point up nearly USD 8/bl during the night before easing back this morning. Brent is currently hovering around USD 98/bl.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye,
Analyst Commodities, SEB

This week has been extraordinarily volatile. We have seen intraday highs at USD 119.5/bl and intraday lows at USD 81.16/bl: all within roughly 38 hours. Every headline is being parsed for signs of escalation or de-escalation, and price action reflects exactly that.

The latest political headlines do little to calm the market. President Trump told Axios on Wednesday that the war with Iran will end “soon” because there is “practically nothing left to target.” On the surface, that sounds like an attempt to signal that the campaign is nearing its end.

Yet, the rest of the reporting points in the opposite direction. According to the same article, neither US nor Israeli officials have received any internal guidance on when military operations are expected to stop. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said the war will continue “without any time limit” for as long as necessary to achieve its objectives. In parallel, both US and Israeli officials are reportedly preparing for at least two more weeks of strikes inside Iran.

That is a major mismatch. Trump is talking as if the campaign is close to completion, while those involved operationally appear to be preparing for something much more prolonged. For the oil market, that alone is enough to keep prices elevated. Even if the White House wants to calm expectations, the underlying signal is still that this may not be over anytime soon.

The “at least two more weeks of strikes” headline matters when you put the numbers into context. We have already had roughly 11-12 days of conflict. Add another 14 days, and we are suddenly looking at around 25 days in total. Apply that to roughly 20 million bl/d of flows through the Strait of Hormuz, and you are talking about something close to 500 million barrels of disrupted supply to global markets.

That is where the 400-million-barrel SPR release headline needs to be understood properly. Yes, 400 million barrels sounds huge. But the key issue is not the total volume (it is the daily release rate). The maximum sustainable release rate is roughly 2 million barrels per day, meaning a 400-million-barrel release would take around 200 days to fully hit the market.

So even though the headline number looks impressive, the short-term offset is limited. If a major disruption removes 15-18 million bl/d from the market, roughly the scale tied to Hormuz flows, then a 2 million bl/d emergency release barely scratches the surface.

i.e., SPR releases are likely more to signal and calm market psychology than replacing lost supply.

There has also been some confusion around the US reserve-release headlines. The 172 million barrels referenced in some reports are not additional barrels on top of the 400 million already announced, they are part of the same broader release package.

Our base view remains that Trump will want this war to end. Oil prices and the approaching midterm elections will push him in that direction. But the much harder question is what it would take for Iran to “reopen” Hormuz fully and safely afterwards. Compensation for rebuilding damaged infrastructure? Guarantees against renewed attacks? Some broader political or security arrangement? That remains completely unclear.

Another important point is that two more weeks of strikes also mean two more weeks of risk for lasting damage to oil infrastructure. Even if the conflict eventually de-escalates, the market may still have to deal with damaged loading facilities, terminals, pipelines or shipping routes. That is part of what makes this more serious than a simple headline-driven spike.

At the same time, some of the “lost” supply may in practice be delayed rather than permanently destroyed. Oil has been built up inside the Gulf during the disruption, and some of those barrels would start flowing back to global markets once the Gulf reopens. So, part of the current shock could later reverse as trapped supply is released.

Overnight headlines underline just how nervous the market remains. Trump said he wants to refill the SPR quickly, Oman reportedly began evacuating ships from Mina al Fahal, and Brent briefly moved back above USD 100/bl as disruption hit a key Omani port. In addition, China has reportedly told refiners to suspend all refined fuel export cargoes: another sign that governments are shifting into supply-security mode.

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Another thing often overlooked in these situations is hoarding behavior. If governments or market participants start stockpiling aggressively, the effect can make the situation worse. That is exactly what happened during the 1970s oil crisis, when precautionary buying added roughly 2-3 million bl/d of extra demand on top of the underlying supply shock. That kind of behavior can amplify price spikes very quickly. China has already been building inventories over the past year, and there are signs that other large importers such as Japan and South Korea are also securing as many barrels as they can.

Finally, on naval escorts: we have highlighted before that even if they are introduced, flows would still likely remain well below normal. Lloyd’s estimates that naval escorts could in theory protect enough ships to keep some traffic moving, but that this would require more naval assets than are currently available. Even in that best-case scenario, less than 10% of normal traffic may get through, and realistically, even that may prove optimistic.

In short, inventory releases may help at the margin, but they are nowhere near large enough to offset a major physical disruption. The real issue is not the headline volume of reserves; it is whether physical flows through Hormuz can resume in a credible and sustained way.

_______________

Yesterday’s US DOE report was somewhat mixed, but with the key point being that commercial crude inventories rose by 3.8 m bl on the week to 443.1 m bl. Even after the build, crude inventories still sit around 2% below the five-year average for this time of year.

On the products side, the picture was more constructive. Gasoline inventories fell 3.7 m bl, while distillates declined 1.3 m bl. Gasoline stocks remain about 5% above the five-year average, but distillates are now roughly 2% below. Total commercial petroleum inventories fell by 2.0 m bl on the week, which softens the bearish read from the crude build alone.

Refinery activity picked up further, with crude runs increasing by 328 k bl/d to 16.2 m bl/d, while utilisation rose to 90.8%. Product output also moved higher, with gasoline production at 9.9 m bl/d and distillate production at 4.9 m bl/d.

On the demand side, the four-week averages remain reasonably supportive. Total products supplied are running 1.9% above the same period last year, with gasoline up 0.8%, distillates up 0.4%, and jet fuel showing the strongest growth at +7.3% YoY.

i.e., the crude build is the headline, but the broader inventory picture is less bearish than that suggests. Product draws continue, total commercial inventories fell, and crude stocks remain slightly below normal for the time of year.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

It is like the market believes in magic. That makes Brent 2027 such a bargain

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

IEA Proposes Largest Ever Oil Release From Strategic Reserves (WSJ). Brent up 3.3%. Doesn’t look like the oil market thinks that ”largest ever” release of strategic reserves will help much against current crisis. Brent up 4% to $91.3/b. 

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Buy Brent 2027 at close to ”neutral price”. Brent crude for year 2027 is trading at $71.6/b. That is just $3.6/b above the ”neutral price” of $68/b. When the global oil market fluctuates between surplus and deficit, the Brent spot price will swing below or above this ”neutral price” of $68/b. Sometimes way below as in spring of 2020 and sometimes way above.

Brent spot is trading $22/b above the ”neutral price” of $68/b. The Brent 1M price is trading at $90/b this morning and $22/b above the ”neutral price” in an expression of risk, stress and disruption of oil logistics as the Persian Gulf is closed. But the market is pricing Brent Y2027 at $71.6/b and a premium of only $3.6/b above the neutral price. Implicitly assuming that the oil market will be normal in 2027 with normal inventories and normal supply. Everything restored.

If global stocks draws down 500 mb, then $80/b 2027 is the price. More if oil infrastructure damaged. Brent averaged $81/b in 2023/24. Then global visible stocks rose 500 mb in 2025. Mostly east of Suez. Brent then averaged $63/b in 4Q25. If the Strait of Hormuz is closed for 25 days, then global stocks will draw down by 500 mb. Brent should then trade around $80/b just due to the inventory drawdown. Higher if inventories are drawn down more and yet higher if installations of oil production, processing, refining or shipping logistics are damaged. Takes significant time to repair and restore.

When the market now prices Brent 2027 at only $71.2/b it thus assumes that inventories will only draw down by some 250 mb. Ops, we are already there as the Strait of Hormuz now has been closed for 11-12 days. It also assumes that there will be absolutely no lasting damage to oil infrastructure in the Persian Gulf.

Risk that Israel will damage Iranian oil infrastructure. It is increasingly argued that Israel and the US have different strategic goals. The US/Trump wants to end this as quickly as possible. Wants to see oil prices fall quickly back to normal. Israel however probably wants to use this once in a lifetime opportunity to totally destroy and degrade Iran altogether. High or ultrahigh oil price not so important. Leaving Iran with no water, no oil, no money, no economy and very limited capability to rebuild its country (and weapons systems and nuclear facilities) after the war.

Brent 2027 is just one Israeli bomb away from jumping to $80/b or higher. Brent crude calendar 2027 today trading at $71.6/b is just one Israeli bomb (hitting Iranian oil infrastructure) away from trading at $80/b or higher. Global inventories have already suffered 11-12 days of Hormuz closure. I.e. the world has lost 220 – 240 mb of oil stocks. And as stated above, the price of $71.6/b is only $3.6/b above the ”everything is normal price”. What a bargain. Buy it!

Fear is starting to rush through the veins Birol. Looking back at recent events. Fathi Birol (IEA) last week: ”Plenty of oil in the market. No need to release strategic reserves.” Then G7 preparing for release. And now ”IEA Proposes Largest Ever Oil Release From Strategic Reserves (WSJ)”. This shows how the sense of fear is starting to rush through the veins Birol.

Oil price spike forced Trump to the podium. Another is on Monday. Brent spiked to $119.5/b. That forced Trump to jump to the podium reading a statement (quite rare that he reads a pre-written note) of how great everything is going. That all will soon be over. Any issues with the oil market and oil prices will be solved. Trump has the oil markets back. Market believed him and Brent fell sharply. This shows the power of oil. It makes even the most powerful person in the world jump to the podium in an effort to try to talk away the physical problems of the world. It shows that Trump is not in control. Iran declared right after the speech that it is not up to Trump to decide when the war is over. Iran will decide when it is over. Trump might declare victory, pack up and go home. That will however not give any guarantees for the opening of the Strait of Hormuz. That is up to Iran.

Iran has the upper hand. They control the Strait of Hormuz. They control the oil. Trump, Birol and the rest are basically talking about it.

No signs that the world is able to open the Strait of Hormuz by force as promised. We have seen reassurances over the past week that insurance schemes will be set up to cover the war risks so that ships can go through. And that warships will provide safe passage in convoys. Nothing of that so far. It doesn’t take very expensive weapons (Iran has loads of Shahed drones) to shoot at the VLCCs going through. A drone now and then will keep flow of oil through the Strait of Hormuz muted if not fully closed.  

Oil for all or oil for no one. “Strait of Hormuz will either be a Strait of peace and prosperity for all,” Ali Larijani, Iran’s top national security official, said in a social media post on Tuesday. “Or it will be a Strait of defeat and suffering for warmongers.”

Brent Y2027 and beyond is such a bargain!

Source: SEB graph and highlights, Bloomberg data
Fortsätt läsa

Guldcentralen

Aktier

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Populära