Följ oss

Analys

Europe’s energy policy unravels a potential advantage for US energy over Europe

Publicerat

den

WisdomTree
WidsomTree

The clock is ticking for Europe to shield its economy amidst the current energy crisis. The cost of electricity across the European bloc is nearly 10 times the 10-year average in response to Russia cutting back natural gas supplies in retaliation to sanctions. There has been a substantial increase in the share of supply of Liquidifies Natural Gas (LNG) and alternative suppliers as a direct replacement of waning Russian gas supply.

Figure 1: Natural gas flows in the European market, first half 2022 versus first half 2021

Karta hur importen av naturgas till Europa har förändrats
Source: Bruegel, WisdomTree as of 6 September 2022. Please note: Arrows width indicates size of 2022 flow.

European leaders are racing to come up with a plan on energy intervention in the power markets. One of the measures being touted is imposing an energy windfall tax on oil and gas profits to help households and businesses survive this upcoming winter season. The plan is to re-channel these unexpected profits from the energy sector to help domestic consumers and companies pay these high bills. The windfall tax on the oil and gas companies should be treated as a “solidarity contribution,” according to European Commission (EC) President, Ursula von der Leyen.

Imposing a windfall tax on those profiting from the war

A windfall tax would impose a levy on the revenues generated by non-gas producing companies when market prices exceed €200 per megawatt hour (Mwh) and redistribute excess revenues to vulnerable companies and households. There has been greater consensus among other European Union (EU) countries on the windfall tax compared to other parts of the European Commission’s 5-point plan. This includes – setting a price cap on Russian gas, a mandatory reduction in peak electricity demand, funding for ailing utility companies, a windfall tax on fossil fuel companies and changes to collateral requirements for electricity companies. The EC’s plan will need to meet the approval of the bloc before being enforced. The most controversial issue remains the Russian price cap – aimed at penalising Russia for weaponising energy.

Coordinated energy policy needed despite different energy mix across EU bloc

There are major differences between member states based on those that rely on coal, nuclear or renewable power owing to which imposing a one energy policy will be challenging. Austria, Hungary, and Slovakia, known to import large amounts of Russian gas are against the price cap on Russian gas. On the other hand, a number of  EU countries including France, Italy, and Poland, support a cap, but argue it should apply to all imported forms of the fuel, including LNG. Germany is undecided but fears the disagreements on the price caps risk spoiling EU unity. Spain, a big generator of wind and solar power was quick to draw criticism of the proposed €200/Mwh as it does not correspond to the real costs and fails to support electrification and the deployment of renewables.

In the US, various Senators including Senate Finance Chair Ron Wyden, have proposed legislation that would double the tax rate of large oil and gas companies excess profits. However, given the current political climate it seems increasingly unlikely that these proposals would gain any traction in Congress.

Europe’s energy policy likely to put a strain on capex in the near term

Since the oil price plunge from 2014 to 2016 alongside climate change awareness and Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) mandates, the energy sector saw a sharp decline in capital expenditure (capex). Since then, capex in the global energy sector has failed to attain the levels last seen at the peak in 2014. While capex trends in Europe’s energy sector had begun to outpace that of the US, driven mainly by a rise in the share of spending on clean energy, we believe the impending energy crisis and energy policy including the national windfall levies in Europe are likely to disincentivise capex in Europe compared to the US over the medium term. High prices are encouraging several countries to step up fossil fuel investment, as they seek to secure and diversify their sources of supply.

Source: Bloomberg, WisdomTree as of 31 August 2022.

The divergent energy policies and prevalent supply situations in the US and Europe opens up a potential opportunity in the energy sector. The energy sector has been the unique bright spot in global equity markets in 2022 posting the strongest earnings results in H1 2022. Despite its strong price performance, the US energy sector trades at a price to earnings (P/E) ratio of 8x and has a dividend yield of 3%. In September 2008, the energy sector had a 12.5% weight in the S&P 500 and was the fourth largest sector by market capitalisation in the world’s largest economy and equity market. Fast forward to today, the energy sector accounts for only 4% of the S&P 500 Index. While the future trajectory is greener, the world has come to terms with the fact that we will require oil and gas in the interim in order to fulfil our energy requirements. Investment is increasing in all parts of the energy sector, but the main boost in recent years has come from the power sector – mainly in renewables and grids – and from increased spending on end-use efficiency. As Europe plans to reduce its reliance on Russian energy supply, it will become more reliant on US LNG imports. This should fuel further investment in the US energy sector in the interim.

Aneeka Gupta, Director, Macroeconomic Research, WisdomTree

Analys

Crude oil comment: Mixed U.S. data skews bearish – prices respond accordingly

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Since market opening yesterday, Brent crude prices have returned close to the same level as 24 hours ago. However, before the release of the weekly U.S. petroleum status report at 17:00 CEST yesterday, we observed a brief spike, with prices reaching USD 73.2 per barrel. This morning, Brent is trading at USD 71.4 per barrel as the market searches for any bullish fundamentals amid ongoing concerns about demand growth and the potential for increased OPEC+ production in 2025, for which there currently appears to be limited capacity – a fact that OPEC+ is fully aware of, raising doubts about any such action.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

It is also notable that the USD strengthened yesterday but retreated slightly this morning.

U.S. commercial crude oil inventories increased by 2.1 million barrels to 429.7 million barrels. Although this build brings inventories to about 4% below the five-year seasonal average, it contrasts with the earlier U.S. API data, which had indicated a decline of 0.8 million barrels. This discrepancy has added some downward pressure on prices.

On the other hand, gasoline inventories fell sharply by 4.4 million barrels, and distillate (diesel) inventories dropped by 1.4 million barrels, both now sitting around 4-5% below the five-year average. Total commercial petroleum inventories also saw a significant decline of 6.5 million barrels, helping to maintain some balance in the market.

Refinery inputs averaged 16.5 million barrels per day, an increase of 175,000 barrels per day from the previous week, with refineries operating at 91.4% capacity. Crude imports rose to 6.5 million barrels per day, an increase of 269,000 barrels per day.

Over the past four weeks, total products supplied averaged 20.8 million barrels per day, up 1.8% from the same period last year. Gasoline demand increased by 0.6%, while distillate (diesel) and jet fuel demand declined significantly by 4.0% and 4.6%, respectively, compared to the same period a year ago.

Overall, the report presents mixed signals but leans slightly bearish due to the increase in crude inventories and notably weaker demand for diesel and jet fuel. These factors somewhat overshadow the bullish aspects, such as the decline in gasoline inventories and higher refinery utilization.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Crude oil comment: Fundamentals back in focus, with OPEC+ strategy crucial for price direction

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Since the market close on Monday, November 11, Brent crude prices have stabilized around USD 72 per barrel, after briefly dipping to a monthly low of USD 70.7 per barrel yesterday afternoon. The momentum has been mixed, oscillating between bearish and cautious optimism. This morning, Brent is trading at USD 71.9 per barrel as the market adopts a “wait and see” stance. The continued strength of the US dollar is exerting downward pressure on commodities overall, while ongoing concerns about demand growth are weighing on the outlook for crude.

As we noted in Tuesday’s crude oil comment, there has been an unusual silence from Iran, leading to a significant reduction in the geopolitical risk premium. According to the Washington Post, Israel has initiated cease-fire negotiations with Lebanon, influenced by the shifting political landscape following Trump’s potential return to the White House. As a result, the market is currently pricing in a reduced risk of further major escalations in the Middle East. However, while the geopolitical risk premium of around USD 4-5 per barrel remains in the background, it has been temporarily sidelined but could quickly resurface if tensions escalate.

The EIA reports that India has now become the primary source of oil demand growth in Asia, as China’s consumption weakens due to its economic slowdown and rising electric vehicle sales. This highlights growing concerns over China’s diminishing role in the global oil market.

From a fundamental perspective, we expect Brent crude to remain well above USD 70 per barrel in the near term, but the outlook hinges largely on the upcoming OPEC+ meeting in early December. So far, the cartel, led by Saudi Arabia and Russia, has twice postponed its plans to increase production this year. This decision was made in response to weakening demand from China and increasing US oil supplies, which have dampened market sentiment. The cartel now plans to implement the first in a series of monthly hikes starting in January 2025, after originally planning them for October. Given the current supply dynamics, there appears to be limited room for additional OPEC volumes at this time, and the situation will likely be reassessed at their December 1st meeting.

The latest report from the US API showed a decline in US crude inventories of 0.8 million barrels last week, with stockpiles at the Cushing, Oklahoma hub falling by a substantial 1.9 million barrels. The “official” figures from the US DOE are expected to be released today at 16:30 CEST.

In conclusion, over the past month, global crude oil prices have fluctuated between gains and losses as market participants weigh US monetary policy (particularly in light of the election), concerns over Chinese demand, and the evolving supply strategy of OPEC+. The coming weeks will be critical in shaping the near-term outlook for the oil market.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Crude oil comment: Iran’s silence hints at a new geopolitical reality

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Since the market opened on Monday, November 11, Brent crude prices have declined sharply, dropping nearly USD 2.2 per barrel in just over a day. The positive momentum seen in late October and early November has largely dissipated, with Brent now trading at USD 71.9 per barrel.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

Several factors have contributed to the recent price decline. Most notably, the continued strengthening of the U.S. dollar remains a key driver, as it gained further overnight. Meanwhile, U.S. government bond yields showed mixed movements: the 2-year yield rose, while the 10-year yield edged slightly lower, indicating larger uncertainty.

Adding to the downward pressure is ongoing concern over weak Chinese crude demand. The market reacted negatively to the absence of a consumer-focused stimulus package, which has led to persistent pricing in of subdued demand from China – the world’s largest crude importer and second-largest crude consumer. However, we anticipate that China recognizes the significance of the situation, and a substantial stimulus package is imminent once the country emerges from its current balance sheet recession: where businesses and households are currently prioritizing debt reduction over spending and investment, limiting immediate economic recovery.

Lastly, the geopolitical risk premium appears to be fading due to the current silence from Iran. As we have highlighted previously, when a “scheduled” retaliatory strike does not materialize quickly, it reduces any built-in price premium. With no visible retaliation from Iran yesterday, and likely none today or tomorrow, the market is pricing in diminished geopolitical risk. Furthermore, the outcome of the U.S. with a Trump victory may have altered the dynamics of the conflict entirely. It is plausible that Iran will proceed cautiously, anticipating a harsh response (read sanctions) from the U.S. should tensions escalate further.

Looking ahead, the market will be closely monitoring key reports this week: the EIA’s Weekly Petroleum Status Report on Wednesday and the IEA’s Oil Market Report on Thursday.

In summary, we believe that while the demand outlook will eventually stabilize, the strong oil supply continues to act as a suppressing force on prices. Given the current supply environment, there appears to be little room for additional OPEC volumes at this time, a situation the cartel will likely assess continuously on a monthly basis going forward.

With this context, we maintain moderately bullish for next year and continue to see an average Brent price of USD 75 per barrel.

Fortsätt läsa

Centaur

Guldcentralen

Fokus

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Populära