Analys
US shale oil rigs keeps rolling in (oil price not yet low enough to reverse the inflow)

Crude oil price action – A marginal rebound this morning before selling down further
Brent crude traded down 2.5% w/w to Friday with a close of $46.71/b. From a high close of $49.68/b last Monday it was downhill all week with a selloff from Monday close to Friday close of a full 6%. Not even the report of a large inventory draw in US (Crude: -6.3 mb, Gasoline: -3.7 mb and Distillates: -1.9 mb) on Thursday was able to counter the bearish sell-off. This morning Brent crude rebounded 0.5% to $47.18/b before the selling continued. The invitation of Nigeria and Libya to OPEC & Co’s meeting in St. Petersburg, Russia on July 24th is put forward as the explanation for the rebound. Of course OPEC & Co would like to see a production cap on both Nigeria and Libya. It would of course be no problem for Libya to offer a production cap which would be 5% below its 1.6 mb/d capacity while it now is producing just above 1 mb/d and thus still a long way off from a potential cap of 1.5 mb/d (minus 5% versus capacity of 1.6 mb/d).
Further, what has now become entirely clear is that cutting production makes little sense as long as US drillers keeps adding +30 rigs each month.
Crude oil comment – US shale oil rigs keeps rolling in (oil price not yet low enough to reverse the inflow)
The number of US oil rigs rose by 7 last week and also by 7 for implied shale oil rigs. That is above the 10 week average of 5.8 rigs/week. The weekly average since start of June 2016 is 6.7 rigs/wk. There is typically a 6 week lag from price action to rig count change reaction. Six weeks ago the 18mth forward WTI price stood at around $49 – 50/b and thus above the $45-47/b empirical inflection point from one year ago (the price level where oil rigs neither increase nor decrease). Thus naturally rigs keep flowing into market. I.e. the oil price and the forward WTI crude curve were still too high six weeks ago.
The WTI 18 mth on Friday closed at $47.3/b and thus just touching down to the inflection point (empirical value from one year ago)
US oil rig inflow has not yet stopped and continues to flow into the market at a solid, steady rate as of yet.
The oil price needs to move lower in order to stem the inflow.
Over the past six weeks 35 shale oil rigs were added into active operation. So what is the productive impact of these extra 35 rigs? Our estimate is that today each active rig will lead to about 1200 b/d/mth of new production in a combination of [wells/rig/month] and [barrels/well/day/mth1]. That is 42,000 b/d/mth of new production for the 35 rigs. Today we assume a lag from rig activation to first oil of some 8 months due to pad drilling practice. The 35 rigs added over the past 6 weeks will thus be hitting the market with production in January/February 2018. From then onwards well will be stacked on well month after month. The staggering calculation is that by the end of 2018 these 35 rigs will add some 300 kb/d of production when the production of all these wells is stacked on top of each other (assuming 60% well production decline after 12mths).
Tomorrow the US EIA will release its monthly Short Term Energy Outlook (STEO) with a forecast stretching to end of 2019. The EIA has been lagging and under estimating US crude production consistently over the past year. As such they have revised US production forecast up, up, up every month with respect to 2017 and 2018 forecasts. Today their 2017 forecast is probably mostly correct. Their forecasts for 2018 and 2019 are however in our view hugely under estimated. As such we expect them to continue to revise their US crude production forecasts higher and that this will also be part of their message tomorrow at 1800 CET.
Table 1: US oil rig count up by 7 last week
Ch1: US shale oil rig count change versus oil prices 6 weeks ago
Ch2: As oil prices have a lagging impact we expect oil rigs to continue flowing into the market until late August
Ch3: Productive effect of the 35 shale oil rigs added last six weeks: +300 kb/d in December 2018
Assuming 1200 b/d/rig/mth1 and a well production decline of 60% after 12 mths
Ch4: The official US drilling productivity probably under estimates real productivity by some 40% to 60%
This is what we find when we combine wells/rig/mth with barrels/day/well/mth1
When the US EIA adjust for this in their models it should have a dramatic effect on their US oil production forecast.
Table2: Solid draw in inventories in last week’s data
Ch5: Inventories in weekly data back on track for decline – more to come in H2-17
At the moment the market doesn’t care.
The effect should be a tightening of the time spreads at the front end of the crude curve 1 to 3 mths and 1 to 18 months.
Ch6: WTI net long speculative positions slightly higher last week
Net long position still to the high side of neutral
Ch7: Crude forward curves close on Friday and one week ago
Kind regards
Bjarne Schieldrop
Chief analyst, Commodities
SEB Markets
Merchant Banking
Analys
Tightening fundamentals – bullish inventories from DOE

The latest weekly report from the US DOE showed a substantial drawdown across key petroleum categories, adding more upside potential to the fundamental picture.

Commercial crude inventories (excl. SPR) fell by 5.8 million barrels, bringing total inventories down to 415.1 million barrels. Now sitting 11% below the five-year seasonal norm and placed in the lowest 2015-2022 range (see picture below).
Product inventories also tightened further last week. Gasoline inventories declined by 2.1 million barrels, with reductions seen in both finished gasoline and blending components. Current gasoline levels are about 3% below the five-year average for this time of year.
Among products, the most notable move came in diesel, where inventories dropped by almost 4.1 million barrels, deepening the deficit to around 20% below seasonal norms – continuing to underscore the persistent supply tightness in diesel markets.
The only area of inventory growth was in propane/propylene, which posted a significant 5.1-million-barrel build and now stands 9% above the five-year average.
Total commercial petroleum inventories (crude plus refined products) declined by 4.2 million barrels on the week, reinforcing the overall tightening of US crude and products.


Analys
Bombs to ”ceasefire” in hours – Brent below $70

A classic case of “buy the rumor, sell the news” played out in oil markets, as Brent crude has dropped sharply – down nearly USD 10 per barrel since yesterday evening – following Iran’s retaliatory strike on a U.S. air base in Qatar. The immediate reaction was: “That was it?” The strike followed a carefully calibrated, non-escalatory playbook, avoiding direct threats to energy infrastructure or disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz – thus calming worst-case fears.

After Monday morning’s sharp spike to USD 81.4 per barrel, triggered by the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, oil prices drifted sideways in anticipation of a potential Iranian response. That response came with advance warning and caused limited physical damage. Early this morning, both the U.S. President and Iranian state media announced a ceasefire, effectively placing a lid on the immediate conflict risk – at least for now.
As a result, Brent crude has now fallen by a total of USD 12 from Monday’s peak, currently trading around USD 69 per barrel.
Looking beyond geopolitics, the market will now shift its focus to the upcoming OPEC+ meeting in early July. Saudi Arabia’s decision to increase output earlier this year – despite falling prices – has drawn renewed attention considering recent developments. Some suggest this was a response to U.S. pressure to offset potential Iranian supply losses.
However, consensus is that the move was driven more by internal OPEC+ dynamics. After years of curbing production to support prices, Riyadh had grown frustrated with quota-busting by several members (notably Kazakhstan). With Saudi Arabia cutting up to 2 million barrels per day – roughly 2% of global supply – returns were diminishing, and the risk of losing market share was rising. The production increase is widely seen as an effort to reassert leadership and restore discipline within the group.
That said, the FT recently stated that, the Saudis remain wary of past missteps. In 2018, Riyadh ramped up output at Trump’s request ahead of Iran sanctions, only to see prices collapse when the U.S. granted broad waivers – triggering oversupply. Officials have reportedly made it clear they don’t intend to repeat that mistake.
The recent visit by President Trump to Saudi Arabia, which included agreements on AI, defense, and nuclear cooperation, suggests a broader strategic alignment. This has fueled speculation about a quiet “pump-for-politics” deal behind recent production moves.
Looking ahead, oil prices have now retraced the entire rally sparked by the June 13 Israel–Iran escalation. This retreat provides more political and policy space for both the U.S. and Saudi Arabia. Specifically, it makes it easier for Riyadh to scale back its three recent production hikes of 411,000 barrels each, potentially returning to more moderate increases of 137,000 barrels for August and September.
In short: with no major loss of Iranian supply to the market, OPEC+ – led by Saudi Arabia – no longer needs to compensate for a disruption that hasn’t materialized, especially not to please the U.S. at the cost of its own market strategy. As the Saudis themselves have signaled, they are unlikely to repeat previous mistakes.
Conclusion: With Brent now in the high USD 60s, buying oil looks fundamentally justified. The geopolitical premium has deflated, but tensions between Israel and Iran remain unresolved – and the risk of missteps and renewed escalation still lingers. In fact, even this morning, reports have emerged of renewed missile fire despite the declared “truce.” The path forward may be calmer – but it is far from stable.
Analys
A muted price reaction. Market looks relaxed, but it is still on edge waiting for what Iran will do

Brent crossed the 80-line this morning but quickly fell back assigning limited probability for Iran choosing to close the Strait of Hormuz. Brent traded in a range of USD 70.56 – 79.04/b last week as the market fluctuated between ”Iran wants a deal” and ”US is about to attack Iran”. At the end of the week though, Donald Trump managed to convince markets (and probably also Iran) that he would make a decision within two weeks. I.e. no imminent attack. Previously when when he has talked about ”making a decision within two weeks” he has often ended up doing nothing in the end. The oil market relaxed as a result and the week ended at USD 77.01/b which is just USD 6/b above the year to date average of USD 71/b.

Brent jumped to USD 81.4/b this morning, the highest since mid-January, but then quickly fell back to a current price of USD 78.2/b which is only up 1.5% versus the close on Friday. As such the market is pricing a fairly low probability that Iran will actually close the Strait of Hormuz. Probably because it will hurt Iranian oil exports as well as the global oil market.
It was however all smoke and mirrors. Deception. The US attacked Iran on Saturday. The attack involved 125 warplanes, submarines and surface warships and 14 bunker buster bombs were dropped on Iranian nuclear sites including Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. In response the Iranian Parliament voted in support of closing the Strait of Hormuz where some 17 mb of crude and products is transported to the global market every day plus significant volumes of LNG. This is however merely an advise to the Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the Supreme National Security Council which sits with the final and actual decision.
No supply of oil is lost yet. It is about the risk of Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz or not. So far not a single drop of oil supply has been lost to the global market. The price at the moment is all about the assessed risk of loss of supply. Will Iran choose to choke of the Strait of Hormuz or not? That is the big question. It would be painful for US consumers, for Donald Trump’s voter base, for the global economy but also for Iran and its population which relies on oil exports and income from selling oil out of that Strait as well. As such it is not a no-brainer choice for Iran to close the Strait for oil exports. And looking at the il price this morning it is clear that the oil market doesn’t assign a very high probability of it happening. It is however probably well within the capability of Iran to close the Strait off with rockets, mines, air-drones and possibly sea-drones. Just look at how Ukraine has been able to control and damage the Russian Black Sea fleet.
What to do about the highly enriched uranium which has gone missing? While the US and Israel can celebrate their destruction of Iranian nuclear facilities they are also scratching their heads over what to do with the lost Iranian nuclear material. Iran had 408 kg of highly enriched uranium (IAEA). Almost weapons grade. Enough for some 10 nuclear warheads. It seems to have been transported out of Fordow before the attack this weekend.
The market is still on edge. USD 80-something/b seems sensible while we wait. The oil market reaction to this weekend’s events is very muted so far. The market is still on edge awaiting what Iran will do. Because Iran will do something. But what and when? An oil price of 80-something seems like a sensible level until something do happen.
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
USA slår nytt produktionsrekord av naturgas
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
All eyes on OPEC V8 and their July quota decision on Saturday
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Stor uppsida i Lappland Guldprospekterings aktie enligt analys
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Brookfield ska bygga ett AI-datacenter på hela 750 MW i Strängnäs
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Sommaren inleds med sol och varierande elpriser
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
OPEC+ ökar oljeproduktionen trots fallande priser
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Silverpriset släpar efter guldets utveckling, har mer uppsida
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Brent needs to fall to USD 58/b to make cheating unprofitable for Kazakhstan