Analys
One year after USD -37.63/bl
It is exactly one year since WTI crashed to USD -37.63/bl. Yes, it was probably trading games involved. Yes, it was highly specific to storage and pipeline constraints at the pricing point of WTI in Cushing Oklahoma as Brent crude only fell to USD 19.33/bl. Yes, it was a price war between Russia and Saudi Arabia which broke out after the 6 March meeting. Yes, it was Covid-19 lock-downs which killed demand. But what really stands out looking back was that you don’t steal from the King. You don’t steal from OPEC. You don’t steal market shares from the world’ lowest cost producers. Try that again and you’ll get punished again.
The price war between Russia and Saudi Arabia which broke out after the 6 March meeting last year looked like an ill considered tantrum from a hot tempered Muhammed bin Salman in Saudi Arabia lashing out against Russia which did not want to play the ”hold back production, loose market share, get higher prices” game any more. And maybe such a tantrum was really what happen. Who knows.
But the underlying fundamentals story here was that US liquids production was growing like crazy. From Sep 2016 to Jan 2020 it grew by 6.6 m bl/d. And Russia was sick of holding back production forever while seeing US taking more and more market share. The only reason for why this could go on as long as it did was because there was an almost comparable large decline in supply from the key OPEC producers being Venezuela, Iran and Libya which lost 4.5 m bl/d from mid-2017 to mid-2020. Thus yielding room for the incredible US production growth.
It was like the business strategy of US shale oil players was: ”Let’s steel market share from the lowest cost producers in the world being OPEC/OPEC+. Fundamentally that is a no-go strategy to start. Though it can go on for a little while before it falls apart. And it did go on for a little while but largely because of the very large decline from Venezuela, Libya and Iran. But looking back it is obvious that it had to end.
OPEC knows very well that the oil price is all about controlling supply. There is an infinite amount of oil under ground. Make sure it is not too much above ground and you’ll get rich. I.e. control your capex spending. US shale oil players obviously have been nowhere near thinking along such lines.
Looking forward is not all such a great picture if we base it on 1) The ongoing return of production from Iran and Libya. I.e. the reversal of the losses within OPEC from mid-2017 which enabled the US shale oil boom to go on as long as it did and 2) The projected non-OPEC production growth from the US EIA in its March STEO pointing to a very strong rebound in both US shale oil and total non-OPEC production towards the end of 2022.
The key message from 20 April 2020 is: Do not steal from the King. Do not try to steal market shares from the worlds lowest cost producers (it is stupid). If you do you will get punished again. In a world where oil demand is growing at around 1% over the coming years you should not lay plans for growing your production at 2% or 5% or 10% per year. Because if you do it fundamentally means that you must steel market share from someone. It for sure won’t be the lowest cost producers.
The end-game though could be that there is only one way to tame the production from non-OPEC and that is a lower price.
Brent and WTI crude prices and the crazy WTI crash to USD -37.63/bl. The recovery since then is all due to deep cuts in production by OPEC+ and still is. If OPEC+ hadn’t still been holding back significant volumes then we would have had no more than USD 30-40/bl today.
Crazy US hydrocarbon liquids growth. From a low in Sep-2016 it grew by 6.6 m bl/d before the collapse in Q1-2020. According to the EIA’s STEO from March it is set to revive and reach the same gain at the end of 2022 though the EIA STEO from April has modified that a bit lower again.
The same chart for changes in total non-OPEC production since Sep-2016 gives much the same picture. What we see is that it is not only US production which increased but also other non-OPEC producers lifted increased production in this period. But mostly it is US.
And the maga-growth in non-OPEC production did of course take their market share from OPEC. Massive decline in production by three OPEC members Iran, Venezuela and Iran. Libya has now kicked back with more to come and Iran is just about to move into the market again as signals from the ongoing Vienna talks on the revival of JCPOA (Iran nuclear deal) are positive with all sides at the table wanting the same thing. Saudi Arabia, Israel and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard may not want success but they are not sitting at the negotiation table in Vienna. A strong rebound in non-OPEC production as envisioned by the EIA March STEO forecast will be outright impossible with a production revival from these three countries.
Analys
Crude oil comment: A little sideways with new tests towards the 80-line likely
Brent moves into sideways trading around USD 81.5/b with new tests to the 80-line likely. Brent crude traded down 0.9% yesterday to a close of USD 81.29/b and traded as low as USD 80.39/b within the day. This morning it is gaining 0.3% to USD 81.6/b. No obvious major driver for that and the move in oil is well in line with higher industrial metals this morning. The technical picture for Brent 1M is still overbought in terms of RSI at 70.2. But as Brent now has traded a bit sideways for some days the overbought bearish calculus has started to ease a bit. But new tests towards the 80-line seems likely with current RSI at 70.2.
Scott Bessent says he fully supports harder sanctions on Russian oil exports if Donald Trump wishes to use such a tool in the coming negotiations with Russia over Ukraine. That may add some support to oil this morning. The latest US sanctions towards Russia clearly have an effect with one example being the tanker Bhilva which has made a U-turn back towards Russia after having been on course to India (Bloomberg).
US EIA projects US liquids growth of 538 kb/d/y in 2025. The US EIA released its monthly STEO report earlier this week. What is clear is that the boom-years in US oil production are behind us for now. But exactly pinning down at what level US oil production will grow in 2025 is hard. The EIA forecast for US hydrocarbon liquids looks the following:
Estimated US crude oil production growth is projected to be virtually zero in 2026. But including all sources of liquids it still sums up to 312 kb/d y/y in growth. A lot or a little? If global oil demand in 2026 only grows with 1 mb/d in 2026, then the US will cover 30% of global demand growth. That is a lot. For 2025 the EIA expects a total growth in US liquids of 538 kb/d y/y.
Smaller losses in existing shale oil production. If we instead look at EIA estimates for US shale oil production right here and now and how its components are changing, we see that 1) New monthly production is 666 kb/d, 2) Losses in existing production is 622 kb/d and thus 3) Net monthly growth is 44 kb/d m/m which equals 4) A net marginal annualized growth of 12*44 of 523 kb/d/y. What stands out here is that the EIA in its December report estimated that this marginal annualization only equated to 378 kb/d/y. So, it has been lifted markedly in the latest report. It is however on a downward trajectory and as such the EIA estimate in the table above of y/y growth for US crude oil of 331 kb/d/y may be sensible.
US shale oil new production, losses in existing production, net new production and marginal, annualized production growth in kb/d/y.
Change in EIA STEO forecast from Dec-24 to Jan-25. What stands out is that estimated losses in existing production is adjusted lower by 16.8 kb/d since November. That is the marginal monthly change. In other words, production in existing production is falling less agressively than estimated in December. But a monthly decline of 622 kb/d/m is of course still massive.
Analys
Crude oil comment: The rally has legs, but it takes time to wash out ingrained bearish sentiment from H2-24
Brent crude jumped jet another 2.7%. Brent crude jumped 2.7% yesterday to USD 82.03/b following a pull-back on Tuesday. Intraday it reached USD 82.63/b and its highest level since 26 July last year. Bullish US oil inventory data was a key reason for the jump higher yesterday coming on top of a steady tightening market since early December and fresh US sanctions on Russia last week.
US crude stocks down 17.6 mb since mid-November and total US commercial stocks down 65 mb since mid-July. US crude stocks fell 2 mb last week to its lowest level since April 2022. US crude stocks have declined every week since mid-November with a total of 17.6 mb. Total US commercial oil inventories fell 3.4 mb last week and have been in steady decline of close to 300 kb/d since early July. These declines in US oil stocks are the proof of the pudding in terms of the balance of the global oil market and explains well the rising oil prices since early December.
The IEA estimates a 400 kb/d deficit in H2-24. If so, then all global draws took place in the US. The IEA released its monthly Oil Market Report (OMR) yesterday with an estimate that the global oil market ran a deficit of about 400 kb/d through H2-24. If so, then close to all inventory draws in the whole world solely took place in US inventories which drew down by around 300 kb/d. That is hard to believe.
If we assume that US inventory draws were proportional to the US demand share of the world (about 20%), then global inventory draws in H2-24 probably was closer to 0.3/20% which equals 1.5 mb/d. Maybe a bit high but estimates by FGE indicates that global inventory draws were close to 1.0 mb/d in H2-24 depending on whether you equate on apparent demand or real demand. Higher if equated on real demand.
IEA surplus in 2025 is adjusted down by 200 kb/d. In reality it is now only a surplus of 400 kb/d. We think this surplus estimate will erode further as demand will be adjusted yet higher and supply will be adjusted yet lower going forward. The IEA adjusted 2024 demand higher by 100 kb/d with base effect to 2025 with the same. It also adjusted its non-OPEC production estimate for 2025 down by 100 kb/d. The effect was that call-on-OPEC rose by 200 kb/d for 2025. The IEA still estimates that OPEC must reduce its production by 0.6 mb/d in 2025 to keep market balanced and prices steady. But within that estimate it assumes that FSU increases production by 200 kb/d as if it is not a part of OPEC+. IEA estimate for call-on-OPEC+ thus only declines by 400 kb/d y/y in 2025. We think that this surplus will evaporate as: 1) US production will likely deliver a bit lower than expected. 2) Supply will also disappoint here and there around the world. 3) Global demand estimates will be revised higher for 2024 and 2025.
The rally thus has legs, but the technical picture is still in overbought territory so there will be some pullbacks on the way higher. Unless of course we rally all the way to USD 95/b and THEN we get the technical pullback. The market still seems to have bearish skepticism deeply ingrained in its back following H2-24 doom and gloom and is partially reluctant to trade higher. But that is attitude and not fundamentals.
The Dubai 1-3 mth time-spread is going through the roof as Asian buyers scrambles for supply from the Middle East.
The average 1-3 mth time-spread of Dubai, Brent and WTI is now way up. Lots of room for Brent 1M to move USD 90-95/b
US crude stocks declined by 2 mb last week and total commercial stocks by 3.4 mb.
US commercial crude and product stocks in steady decline since June/July last year. Down 65 mb since mid-July.
US crude stocks at lowest level since 2022.
Brent 1M still overbought with RSI at 72.5. So, pullbacks will happen but from what level. On the upside the next targets are probably USD 87.95/b and USD 92.18/b.
Analys
Crude oil comment: Fundamentally very tight, but technically overbought
Technical pullback this morning even as the dollar weakens. Brent crude gained another 1.6% yesterday with a close at USD 81.01/b and an intraday high of USD 81.68/b which was the highest level since mid-August. The gain yesterday was supported by strong, further gains in the 1-3 mth time-spreads. This morning Brent is pulling back 0.6% to USD 80.5/b even though the USD is weakening 0.4% while time-spreads are strengthening even further. This makes it look like a technical pullback.
Brent is trading very weak versus current time-spreads. The current price of Brent crude at USD 80.6/b is very low versus where the 1-3 mth time spreads are trading. Brent should typically have traded somewhere between USD 80-95/b with current time-spreads when we compare where this relationship has been trading since the start of 2023. Brent is now trading in the absolute lower range of that with lots of room on the upside.
How long will the new sanctions last? Natural questions are: How long will Donald Trump leave the new sanctions operational? How strictly will they be enforced? How easily could Russia circumvent them?
A bullish H1-25 if Donald Trump leaves sanctions intact to negotiate over Ukraine. If Brent continues to trade around USD 80/b and not much higher, then the underlying assumptions must be that the new sanctions will not be enforced harshly and that they will be lifted by Donald Trump within a couple of months max. Donald Trump could however keep them in place as a leverage versus Putin in the upcoming negotiations over Ukraine. If so, they could stay intact for maybe 6 months or more which would put H1-2025 on a very bullish footing.
Fundamentally very tight, but technically overbought. Market right now looks technically overbought with RSI at 72 but also fundamentally very tight with the Dubai 1-3 mth time-spread at USD 2.74/b, its highest level since September 2023. As such the Brent crude oil price has the potential to coil up for further gains following some washing out of technically overbought dynamics. But maybe the current Asian panic over access to medium sour crude oil fades a bit over time and time-spreads ease with it.
Brent has been on a strengthening path well before the new sanctions. Worth remembering though is that Brent crude has been on a rising trend along with tightening time-spreads since early December. The latest bullishness from new US sanctions comes on top of that. Brent moving higher into the 80ies thus seems highly likely following a near term washout of technical overbought dynamics.
1-3 mth time-spread (average of Dubai, Brent and WTI spreads) versus the Brent 1M price. Very strong, bullish signals from the time-spreads, but Brent 1M is trading at the very lower level of where this relationship has been since the start of 2023. So, plenty of room for Brent 1M to move higher.
Brent 1M is technically overbought with RSI at 73. Pullbacks are likely near term to wash that out. On the low side the USD 70/b line has given solid support since mid-2023.
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Kina har förbjudit exporten av gallium till USA, Neo Performance Materials är den enda producenten i Nordamerika
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Turbulent elår avslutas med lugnare julvecka
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Solenergi i Danmark katastrofalt olönsam, största aktören har havererat
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Priset på nötkreatur det högsta någonsin i USA
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Uranbrytning ska bli tillåtet i Sverige
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Tuffa tider för stål i Europa
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Europa är den dominerande köparen av olja från USA
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Brent prices slip on USD surge despite tight inventory conditions