Analys
Market likely to rewrite all Brent crude forecasts for 2018

Exactly two weeks ago we argued that Brent crude would probably reach $65/b before Christmas. And wow has that delivered quicker than we thought. Of course yesterday’s 3.5% jump to $54.27/b (intraday high of $54.44/b) did come on the back of the political events in Saudi Arabia. Princes, billionaires and ministers were arrested and accused of corruption while the real reason of course was to secure the way to the throne for Prince Mohammed Bin Salman (MBS). In our view the events in Saudi Arabia this weekend were merely a catalyst which drove the oil price higher and more quickly than expected. In general we see little reason to be concerned for the supply of Saudi Arabia’s production. That was probably also the main view by European traders yesterday as Brent crude traded only marginally up in the European season (aligned with some positive moves in metals) before US traders came into the market and kicked it higher.
What is really at the heart of why we think everyone now will revise their Brent crude forecasts for 2018 is the realisation that the Brent crude 1 month contract, the Brent “spot price”, is not really what the US shale oil players are getting for their crude oil. Whatever unhedged oil the US shale oil players currently are producing they will only get $57.3/b or the WTI 1 month price. And they won’t even get that as there is a transportation cost from the well-head to Cushing Oklahoma as a discount to that as well.
More importantly is what’s dictating shale oil players’ profitability for new investments, new drilling and additional wells. That is not the front month WTI price but the 1.5 year forward WTI price (the WTI 18 month contract) at which they can hedge new investments. And that price yesterday closed at only $53.3/bl. I.e. for new investments US shale oil players are only offered $53.3/bl for delivery at Cushing Oklahoma which is far away from the current Brent 1mth price of $64/b.
The WTI 18 mth contract traded as high as $57.4/b earlier in the year. So while the Brent 1mth price is rising to new highs of the year and highest since 2015, the WTI 18mth contract is still 3 dollar lower than its high this year and not at all giving a strong stimulating investment push for shale oil producers.
This is clearly a dream come true for OPEC. That they can have a high Brent 1mth price close to $65/b while at the same time not giving a strong price stimulus to US shale oil producers as they are only offered $53.3/bl on the curve. Yes, Christmas did indeed come early for OPEC this year! Then of course the question is whether Christmas will last all of 2018 or not. So what is at the heart of this Christmas present?
It is two-fold.
One is the increasing Brent crude oil backwardation with the Brent 1mth contract trading at a $5.1/bl premium to the the Brent 18mth contract. This comes partly as a result of the constant draw down in global crude oil inventories and partly due to the increasing net long Brent speculative positioning. And yes there is a relationship between backwardation and speculative length. When net length is increasing the backwardation is increasing.
At the moment net long Brent is at an all-time high. That will of course not last for ever. So in the next market turn when specs pull out the level of backwardation will soften somewhat as well. However, assume that OPEC+ will “hold” the market all through 2018 so that inventories continue yet lower. Not necessarily steeply lower but at least ticking lower. Then the Brent crude oil backwardation should not fall back to zero. Rather it should hold up at some level and then strengthen with declining stocks. In perspective the Brent 1 to 18 mth backwardation time spread traded around $7/b from mid-2011 to mid-2014 when Brent crude traded around $110/b. So the $5/b backwardation may be a bit rich as we are not quite back to a 2011-2014 situation quite yet.
The second and more important one is the increasing Brent to WTI spread we have witnessed this year. And it is not just in the front of the curves where the spread has widened out. It has happened all along the curve. In January the Brent 18mth to WTI 18 mth spread only traded at $1/b while it now trades at close to $6/bl.
When we look at global oil inventories they have been drawing down relentlessly since mid-March this year. In the US we have seen that oil product stocks have drawn down to normal with middle distillate stocks there down to below now ahead of winter. US crude stocks have however been a much more tedious and slow draw down as they in total still stand more than 100 mbl above a fair normal. However, if we split out the US mid-Continent which contains Cushing Oklahoma stocks where the WTI crude is priced we see that non-mid-Continent US crude stocks have been drawn down rapidly. The mid-Continent stocks however are actually now higher than a year ago and rising. And since this is where the WTI crude is priced it is holding down the WTI price.
The WTI crude curve is actually still in contango at the front end of the curve due to this. And since stocks in the mid-Continent are rising higher there is an increasing risk that the WTI crude price might break down into deeper front end contango and an even wider Brent to WTI spread and thus a lower WTI 1mth price.
We are thus likely going to witness a yet widening divergence between Brent and WTI crude oil price. Especially in the front. That is also why the net long speculative positions in WTI is not at an all-time-high as is the case with Brent positions. And those with a long position in WTI are at risk for a break-down in the WTI prices as the mid-Continent stocks continues to rise.
A key question for us at the moment (which we are unable to answer) is whether the rising crude stocks in the US mid-Continent now is due to natural bottlenecks due to lack of pipeline investments or whether it is due to damaged infrastructure following the Hurricane Harvey.
If it is the first then the bottleneck is probably of a lasting character. Then US shale producers have probably reached the short/medium term transportation capacity of getting their oil to the market. It will of course not last for ever as there is always possible to lay more pipes, but it takes time. In that case the Brent crude oil price can continue to rally without having to worry too much because the WTI price which then is stuck in surplus in the mid-US Continent. Then there is no point for US shale oil producers to increase production as they cannot easily get it to market. And the subdued WTI price will be the one telling them not to invest more and not to produce more since it will be low due to high mid-Continent stocks.
If the rising mid-Continental stocks are due to Hurricane Harvey damages then it might be quicker to mend. Then the Brent to WTI spread should contract from current levels once the Harvey damage is mended.
Looking at the US mid-Continent stocks we see that they started to rise at the end of August which was right at the time of Hurricane Harvey and has gone up by some 10 mbl since then. However, this might not be a good indication that Harvey is the culprit as inventories normally rise some 4 mbl during this period anyhow.
We are not quite sure whether it is Hurricane Harvey damage which drives US mid-Continental stocks higher or whether it is structural under investments in pipelines. However, as US shale oil production continues to rise (as we think it will in 2018) the pressure in terms of utilization of US oil pipeline transportation capacities will be increasingly taxed which is likely to hold the Brent – WTI price spread high.
So Brent crude oil price forecasts for 2018 are likely going to be revised up across the board as they now are likely to incorporate a more substantial Brent – WTI 1mth price spread for 2018. Current Brent crude 2018 Bloomberg consensus forecast currently stand at $56/bl with market pricing at $62/bl while SEB’s standing forecast from September is $55/bl.
The fundamental assumption for most forecasting methodologies is still that US shale oil is on the margin. For a long time the assumption has been that US shale oil can deliver almost unlimited at WTI $50/b. That assumption is now breaking down. US shale oil producers have not made money this year with investors now DEMANDING that they deliver profits and not just promises. While it is difficult to say exactly at what level they will create profits it is natural to shift the shale oil base floor price assumption from $50/bl to $55/bl. I.e. assuming that US shale oil production is not going through the roof with a WTI 18 mth price at $55/b. I.e. the WTI price is allowed to trade at $55/bl both in spot and on the curve without creating surplus havoc in the global market.
We thus expect revisions of Brent crude oil forecasts to assume a WTI 1mth crude price delivered at around $55/bl next year and then with a Brent 1mth to WTI 1mth price spread to Brent on top of some $5-7/bl thus placing Brent forecasts for 2018 at around $60-62/bl. Such assumptions are likely to affect our own Brent crude oil forecast for 2018 when we revise it in February next year.
Ch1) US commercial crude oil stocks less the US mid-continent are drawing down rapidly
Getting close to normal by end of year
Ch2) US mid-Continent stocks (Pad2) have however rising and above last year.
This is where WTI crude is priced in Cushing Oklahoma and is why the WTI crude curve has front end contango with risk for deeper contango
Ch3) US shale oil regions
Ch4) Not all shale oil producers need to pass through Cushing Oklahoma
But the exact magnitude and location of bottlenecks getting shale oil to the U.S. Gulf we don’t know.
Looks like Eagle Ford and Permian have more options to bypass Cushing getting right to the US Gulf.
Are Eagle Ford and Permian producers actually getting a price closer to seaborne crude prices than to WTI?
Ch5) Brent and WTI crude curves moving higher over last two weeks
Ch6) Brent 1mth contract has rallied to close to $65/b.
Steepening Brent backwardation and widening Brent – WTI crude spreads has left the WTI 18 mth contract in the doldrums no higher than $53.3/b
Ch7) The WTI 18 mth forward price at $53.3/b still short of year high of $57.4/b
Ch8) Brent 1mth to WTI 1mth crude spread has blown out
Ch9) And US crude oil is flushing out of the US as exports as a result of the strong widening in Brent to WTI
But as we see above it is not flowing out of the US mid-Continent where WTI is priced
Ch10) US shale oil players are kicking drilling rigs out of the US at a WTI 18mth curve price of $50/bl
They can of course drill more but then they are begging a higher forward WTI price.
Risk for a smoke and mirror in these statistics as shale players are currently running some 100 drilling rigs more than they need.
They need to kick they out in order to align drilling with completions which still ran at a surplus in September as they drilled more than they completed.
We expect shale players to kick out 5-10 rigs every week to Christmas.
It will be sentiment bullish, but unlikely to impact completions all that much in 2018 as they have a load full of DUCs they can complete in 2018
Ch11) US shale players kicking out rigs at a WTI18 curve price of $50/bl
Ch12) Will shale players hold their horses as the mid-term WTI forward price moves higher?
Good reasons to believe that they will kick out more drilling rigs at WTI curve $50/b as investors demand profits
Kind regards
Bjarne Schieldrop
Chief analyst, Commodities
SEB Markets
Merchant Banking
Analys
Crude inventories builds, diesel remain low

U.S. commercial crude inventories posted a 3-million-barrel build last week, according to the DOE, bringing total stocks to 426.7 million barrels – now 6% below the five-year seasonal average. The official figure came in above Tuesday’s API estimate of a 1.5-million-barrel increase.

Gasoline inventories fell by 0.8 million barrels, bringing levels roughly in line with the five-year norm. The composition was mixed, with finished gasoline stocks rising, while blending components declined.
Diesel inventories rose by 0.7 million barrels, broadly in line with the API’s earlier reading of a 0.3-million-barrel increase. Despite the weekly build, distillate stocks remain 15% below the five-year average, highlighting continued tightness in diesel supply.
Total commercial petroleum inventories (crude and products combined, excluding SPR) rose by 7.5 million barrels on the week, bringing total stocks to 1,267 million barrels. While inventories are improving, they remain below historical norms – especially in distillates, where the market remains structurally tight.
Analys
OPEC+ will have to make cuts before year end to stay credible

Falling 8 out of the last 10 days with some rebound this morning. Brent crude fell 0.7% yesterday to USD 65.63/b and traded in an intraday range of USD 65.01 – 66.33/b. Brent has now declined eight out of the last ten days. It is now trading on par with USD 65/b where it on average traded from early April (after ’Liberation day’) to early June (before Israel-Iran hostilities). This morning it is rebounding a little to USD 66/b.

Russia lifting production a bit slower, but still faster than it should. News that Russia will not hike production by more than 85 kb/d per month from July to November in order to pay back its ’production debt’ due to previous production breaches is helping to stem the decline in Brent crude a little. While this kind of restraint from Russia (and also Iraq) has been widely expected, it carries more weight when Russia states it explicitly. It still amounts to a total Russian increase of 425 kb/d which would bring Russian production from 9.1 mb/d in June to 9.5 mb/d in November. To pay back its production debt it shouldn’t increase its production at all before January next year. So some kind of in-between path which probably won’t please Saudi Arabia fully. It could stir some discontent in Saudi Arabia leading it to stay the course on elevated production through the autumn with acceptance for lower prices with ’Russia getting what it is asking for’ for not properly paying down its production debt.
OPEC(+) will have to make cuts before year end to stay credible if IEA’s massive surplus unfolds. In its latest oil market report the IEA estimated a need for oil from OPEC of 27 mb/d in Q3-25, falling to 25.7 mb/d in Q4-25 and averaging 25.7 mb/d in 2026. OPEC produced 28.3 mb/d in July. With its ongoing quota unwind it will likely hit 29 mb/d later this autumn. Staying on that level would imply a running surplus of 3 mb/d or more. A massive surplus which would crush the oil price totally. Saudi Arabia has repeatedly stated that OPEC+ it may cut production again. That this is not a one way street of higher production. If IEA’s projected surplus starts to unfold, then OPEC+ in general and Saudi Arabia specifically must make cuts in order to stay credible versus what it has now repeatedly stated. Credibility is the core currency of Saudi Arabia and OPEC(+). Without credibility it can no longer properly control the oil market as it whishes.
Reactive or proactive cuts? An important question is whether OPEC(+) will be reactive or proactive with respect to likely coming production cuts. If reactive, then the oil price will crash first and then the cuts will be announced.
H2 has a historical tendency for oil price weakness. Worth remembering is that the oil price has a historical tendency of weakening in the second half of the year with OPEC(+) announcing fresh cuts towards the end of the year in order to prevent too much surplus in the first quarter.
Analys
What OPEC+ is doing, what it is saying and what we are hearing

Down 4.4% last week with more from OPEC+, a possible truce in Ukraine and weak US data. Brent crude fell 4.4% last week with a close of the week of USD 66.59/b and a range of USD 65.53-69.98/b. Three bearish drivers were at work. One was the decision by OPEC+ V8 to lift its quotas by 547 kb/d in September and thus a full unwind of the 2.2 mb/d of voluntary cuts. The second was the announcement that Trump and Putin will meet on Friday 15 August to discuss the potential for cease fire in Ukraine (without Ukraine). I.e. no immediate new sanctions towards Russia and no secondary sanctions on buyers of Russian oil to any degree that matters for the oil price. The third was the latest disappointing US macro data which indicates that Trump’s tariffs are starting to bite. Brent is down another 1% this morning trading close to USD 66/b. Hopes for a truce on the horizon in Ukraine as Putin meets with Trump in Alaska in Friday 15, is inching oil lower this morning.

Trump – Putin meets in Alaska. The potential start of a process. No disruption of Russian oil in sight. Trump has invited Putin to Alaska on 15 August to discuss Ukraine. The first such invitation since 2007. Ukraine not being present is bad news for Ukraine. Trump has already suggested ”swapping of territory”. This is not a deal which will be closed on Friday. But rather a start of a process. But Trump is very, very unlikely to slap sanctions on Russian oil while this process is ongoing. I.e. no disruption of Russian oil in sight.
What OPEC+ is doing, what it is saying and what we are hearing. OPEC+ V8 is done unwinding its 2.2 mb/d in September. It doesn’t mean production will increase equally much. Since it started the unwind and up to July (to when we have production data), the increase in quotas has gone up by 1.4 mb/d, while actual production has gone up by less than 0.7 mb/d. Some in the V8 group are unable to increase while others, like Russia and Iraq are paying down previous excess production debt. Russia and Iraq shouldn’t increase production before Jan and Mar next year respectively.
We know that OPEC+ has spare capacity which it will deploy back into the market at some point in time. And with the accelerated time-line for the redeployment of the 2.2 mb/d voluntary cuts it looks like it is happening fast. Faster than we had expected and faster than OPEC+ V8 previously announced.
As bystanders and watchers of the oil market we naturally combine our knowledge of their surplus spare capacity with their accelerated quota unwind and the combination of that is naturally bearish. Amid this we are not really able to hear or believe OPEC+ when they say that they are ready to cut again if needed. Instead we are kind of drowning our selves out in a combo of ”surplus spare capacity” and ”rapid unwind” to conclude that we are now on a highway to a bear market where OPEC+ closes its eyes to price and blindly takes back market share whatever it costs. But that is not what the group is saying. Maybe we should listen a little.
That doesn’t mean we are bullish for oil in 2026. But we may not be on a ”highway to bear market” either where OPEC+ is blind to the price.
Saudi OSPs to Asia in September at third highest since Feb 2024. Saudi Arabia lifted its official selling prices to Asia for September to the third highest since February 2024. That is not a sign that Saudi Arabia is pushing oil out the door at any cost.
Saudi Arabia OSPs to Asia in September at third highest since Feb 2024

-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
USA inför 93,5 % tull på kinesisk grafit
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Fusionsföretag visar hur guld kan produceras av kvicksilver i stor skala – alkemidrömmen ska bli verklighet
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Kopparpriset i fritt fall i USA efter att tullregler presenterats
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Lundin Gold rapporterar enastående borrresultat vid Fruta del Norte
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Ryska militären har skjutit ihjäl minst 11 guldletare vid sin gruva i Centralafrikanska republiken
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Stargate Norway, AI-datacenter på upp till 520 MW etableras i Narvik
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Kina skärper kontrollen av sällsynta jordartsmetaller, vill stoppa olaglig export
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Kina har ökat sin produktion av naturgas enormt, men konsumtionen har ökat ännu mer