Analys
Cyklisk rotation driver rekordstora inflöden till olje-ETPer och utflöden från guld

Råvaror fortsatte att prestera dåligt under Q4 2014 och året som helhet är det sämsta för tillgångsklassen sedan finanskrisen. En perfekt storm av faktorer – starkt utbud inom de flesta råvarusektorerna, oro över efterfrågan från Kina och en starkare amerikansk dollar – ligger bakom de låga råvarupriserna och att det globala förvaltade kapitalet sjönk till 101,5 miljarder dollar i Q4, en minskning med 9,2 miljarder dollar jämfört med Q3. Nettoflödena till råvaru-ETPer var neutrala och minskningen av förvaltat kapital bestod i sin helhet av prisändringar. Investerarna tycks se det nuvarande läget som ett tillfälle att öka sin exponering mot cykliska råvarutillgångar och rotera bort från mer defensiva exponeringar som guld.
Det rekordstora inflödet till energisektorn vägde i stort sett upp det stora utflödet från guld-ETPer i Q4 2014 och resultatet blev ett nettoutflöde för råvaru-ETPer på måttliga 30 miljoner dollar. Guld-ETPer hade det största kvartalsutflödet på ett år, totalt 3,1 miljarder dollar, och flödena kom framförallt från amerikanska investerare (78 %) som fått ökat förtroende för USAs återhämtning. Amerikanska investerare drev även det starka inflödet till energi-ETPer och stod för 85 % av det totala inflödet på 3,2 miljarder dollar.
”Investerarna återvänder till råvaror, attraherade av priser som ligger på eller under produktionskostnaden. I det korta perspektivet kan företag och gruvor fortsätta producera trots att priserna ligger under produktionskostnaden, men det är inte hållbart i längden. Om vi inte börjar se en prisuppgång snart kommer produktionen förr eller senare sjunka. Minskat utbud kommer resultera i högre råvarupriser under 2015”, säger Peter Lidblom, Nordenchef på ETF Securities.
Den starka amerikanska dollarn har också bidragit till att dämpa råvarupriserna. Dollarns framfart är dock pådriven av en stark amerikansk ekonomisk tillväxt vilket i grunden är positivt för efterfrågan på råvaror. Samtidigt förväntas beslutsfattare i både Kina och Europa fortsätta reagera starkt på den senaste tidens svaga ekonomiska utveckling i de båda regionerna.
Cykliska råvaror förväntas bli de stora vinnarna av den ekonomiska återhämtningen i USA och Kina under 2015. Kina fortsätter stimulera sin ekonomi och planerar fler råvaruintensiva infrastrukturinvesteringar under 2015 vilket kommer ha en positiv inverkan på de råvaror som är beroende av ekonomisk aktivitet. De bästa investeringsmöjligheterna inför 2015 finns inom cykliska tillgångar givet den tilltagande globala återhämtningen. Men det finns risker, inte minst gällande svagare tillväxt och hot om deflation i Euroområdet och Japan, samt den trögare ekonomiska återhämtningen i Storbritannien. Våra främsta tips inför 2015 är råvarusektorer med exponering mot industrin, som till exempel metaller och energi.
Sammanfattning av de främsta trenderna under 2014:
Förvaltat kapital i råvaru-ETPer sjönk med 20,6 miljarder dollar till 101,5 miljarder dollar i slutet av 2014. En stark amerikansk dollar och oro över tillväxten i Kina och Europa pressade ner många råvarupriser under produktionskostnad.
Taktiska investerare har varit aktiva i råvaror under hela 2014 och investerarnas uthållighet reflekterar den strategiska karaktären hos innehavare av råvaru-ETPer.
Nästan 100 % av nedgången i förvaltat kapital för råvaror under 2014 berodde på prisfall. Nettoutflödet uppgick till måttliga 30 miljoner dollar vilket visar att investerarna verkar rotera in i mer cykliska råvaruexponeringar.
Många råvaror handlas nu på eller under produktionskostnaden. Detta lockar ett antal långsiktiga värdeinvesterare till enskilda råvaror och sektorer där prisnedgången varit särskilt aggressiv.
Ädelmetall-ETPer stod för över 70 % av nedgången i förvaltat kapital för råvaror under 2014. Det förvaltade kapitalet i ädelmetall-ETPer uppgick i slutet av året till 79 miljarder dollar, efter en minskning på 14,8 miljarder dollar under 2014. Utflödena från guld kom huvudsakligen från amerikanska investerare, troligen som ett resultat av mindre defensiva portföljpositioneringar.
Palladium var den enda ädelmetallen som gick mot trenden med ökat förvaltat kapital på 0,9 miljarder dollar. Bakom ökningen låg hotet om utbudsstörningar och en positiv efterfråga vilket höll priserna uppe under 2014. Ökningen i förvaltat kapital bestod till hälften av inflöden.
Guld undantaget hade alla ädelmetaller nettoinflöden under året. Platina och palladium gynnades av potentiella utbudsstörningar i Sydafrika och Ryssland och hade de största inflödena på 432 respektive 376 miljoner dollar.
Energi-ETPer hade starka inflöden under 2014, framförallt under de sista tre månaderna då prisfallet för råolja och naturgas upplevdes överdrivet. Råolja hade den största andelen inflöden medan naturgas stod för runt 25 %. De globala inflödena var mestadels drivna av amerikanska investerare som stod för runt 85 %. Hela inflödet till naturgas kom från amerikanska investerare då stora lager och milt väder tvingade ner priserna på den lägsta nivån sedan 2012.
Näst efter energisektorn hade breda råvaruindex-ETPer de största inflödena (1,1 miljarder dollar) under 2014. Detta indikerar att investerarna börjar se råvaror som en tillgångsklass med högt relativt värde när värderingarna på aktie- och räntemarknaderna skjutit i höjden samtidigt som råvarupriserna gått ner.
Investerarna eftersökte större exponering mot korn, vilket delvis kompenserade utflöden från breda jordbruks-ETPer under 2014. Låga priser på majs och vete attraherade långsiktiga investerare som tror att odlingsförhållandena sannolikt inte kommer vara lika goda den här säsongen som förra. Kaffe hade det största utflödet eftersom möjligheten att El-Nino inträffar under 2015 skulle kunna öka utbudet.
Industrimetaller hade blandade flöden och slutade året med ett utflöde på måttliga 2 miljoner dollar. Problem på utbudssidan gjorde att nickel hade inflöden under varje kvartal under 2014, totalt 122 miljoner dollar. Oro över Kinesisk efterfrågan och ökad finansieringsrisk fick investerarna att dra sig ur koppar-ETPer (52 miljoner dollar). Diversifierade industrimetaller och zink-ETPer hade också utflöden.
Analys
Unusual strong bearish market conviction but OPEC+ market strategy is always a wildcard

Brent crude falls with strong conviction that trade war will hurt demand for oil. Brent crude sold off 2.4% yesterday to USD 64.25/b along with rising concerns that the US trade war with China will soon start to visibly hurt oil demand or that it has already started to happen. Tariffs between the two are currently at 145% and 125% in the US and China respectively which implies a sharp decline in trade between the two if at all. This morning Brent crude (June contract) is trading down another 1.2% to USD 63.3/b. The June contract is rolling off today and a big question is how that will leave the shape of the Brent crude forward curve. Will the front-end backwardation in the curve evaporate further or will the July contract, now at USD 62.35/b, move up to where the June contract is today?

The unusual ”weird smile” of Brent forward curve implies unusual strong bearish conviction amid current prompt tightness. the The Brent crude oil forward curve has displayed a very unusual shape lately with front-end backwardation combined with deferred contango. Market pricing tightness today but weakness tomorrow. We have commented on this several times lately and Morgan Stanly highlighted how unusual historically this shape is. The reason why it is unusual is probably because markets in general have a hard time pricing a future which is very different from the present. Bearishness in the oil market when it is shifting from tight to soft balance usually comes creeping in at the front-end of the curve. A slight contango at the front-end in combination with an overall backwardated curve. Then this slight contango widens and in the end the whole curve flips to full contango. The current shape of the forward curve implies a very, very strong conviction by the market that softness and surplus is coming. A conviction so strong that it overrules the present tightness. This conviction flows from the fundamental understanding that ongoing trade war is bad for the global economy, for oil demand and for the oil price.
Will OPEC+ switch to cuts or will it leave balancing to a lower price driving US production lower? Add of course also in that OPEC+ has signaled that it will lift production more rapidly and is currently no longer in the mode of holding back to keep Brent at USD 75/b due to an internal quarrel over quotas. That stand can of course change from one day to the next. That is a very clear risk to the upside and oil consumers around should keep that in the back of their minds that this could happen. Though we are not utterly convinced of the imminent risk of this. Before such a pivot happens, Iraq and Kazakhstan probably have to prove that they can live up to their promised cuts. And that will take a few months. Also, OPEC+ might also like to see where the pain-point for US shale oil producers’ price-vise really is today. So far, we have seen no decline in the number of US oil drilling rigs in operation which have steadily been running at around 480 rigs.
With a surplus oil market on the horizon, OPEC+ will have to make a choice. How shale this coming surplus be resolved? Shall OPEC+ cut in order to balance the market or shall lower oil prices drive pain and lower production in the US which then will result in a balanced market? Maybe it is the first or maybe the latter. The group currently has a bloated surplus balance which it needs to slim down at some point. And maybe now is the time. Allowing the oil price to slide. Economic pain for US shale oil producers to rise and US oil production to fall in order to balance the market and make room OPEC+ to redeploy its previous cuts back into the market.
Surplus is not yet here. US oil inventories likely fell close to 2 mb last week. US API yesterday released indications that US crude and product inventories fell 1.8 mb last week with crude up 3.8 mb, gasoline down 3.1 mb and distillates down 2.5 mb. So, in terms of a crude oil contango market (= surplus and rising inventories) we have not yet moved to the point where US inventories are showing that the global oil market now indeed is in surplus. Though Chinese purchases to build stocks may have helped to keep the market tight. Indications that Saudi Arabia may lift June Official Selling Prices is a signal that the oil market may not be all that close to unraveling in surplus.
The low point of the Brent crude oil curve is shifting closer to present. A sign that the current front-end backwardation of the Brent crude oil curve is about to evaporate.

Brent crude versus US Russel 2000 equity index. Is the equity market too optimistic or the oil market too bearish?

Analys
Oil demand at risk as US consumers soon will face hard tariff-realities

Muted sideways trading. Brent crude traded mostly sideways last week, but due to a relatively strong close on the Friday before, it ended the week down 1.6% at USD 66.87/b with a high-low range of USD 65.29 – 68.65/b. So muted price range action. Brent crude is trading marginally higher, up 0.3%, this morning amid mixed equity and commodity markets.

Strong Chinese buying in April as oil prices dipped. Chinese imports of crude continued to accelerate in April following a surge in March with data from Kepler indicating that Chinese imports averaged near 11 mb/d in April. That is an 18mth high and strongly up versus only 8.9 mb/d in January (FT.com today). That has most certainly helped to stem the rot in the oil price which bottomed at an intraday low of USD 58.4/b on 9 April. It has probably also helped to keep the front-end of the Brent crude oil forward curve in consistent backwardation. The strong buying from China is both opportunistic stockpiling due to the price slump but also rebuilding of oil inventories in general.
Oil speculators are cautious with oil demand at risk as US consumers soon will face hard tariff-realities. But oil market speculators are far from bullish. While net long speculative positions are up 52.2 mb over the week to last Tuesday, it is still only the 15th lowest speculative positioning over the past 52 weeks. The underlying concern is of course the US tariffs which is crippling exports of goods from China to the US with bookings of container freight down by 30% according to Hapag-Lloyd. Bloomberg’s Chief US economist, Anna Wong, is saying that empty shelves in US shops will soon be the reality. Thus US-China trade relations need to be fixed quickly to avoid hard realities for US consumers. The lead-times are long and the current tariffs and uncertainty around these is now risking availability for US consumer goods for the holiday seasons in H2-25. Tariff realities for US consumers are increasingly just around the corner. ”Rubber will hit the road” very soon and that is when we might see weaker oil demand as well.
Brent crude traded mostly sideways last week though ended down 1.6% in the end.

Net long speculative positions in Brent and WTI up 52.2 mb over week to last Tuesday but still at 15-week low over past 52 weeks.

Analys
Brent crude is now trading below its nominal 2018-19 average in EUR/barrel terms

Brent crude gained a meager 0.65% yesterday with a close of USD 66.55/b. That was not much given that US equity markets rallied 2% yesterday with Nasdaq now is almost back to its pre ”Liberation Day” level. Brent crude is trading unchanged this morning with little impulse to do anything it seems.

Equity markets have gotten a boost along with easing US tariff rhetoric. The Brent crude oil price has however not gotten the same rebound and is today still trading USD 8.5/b lower than its USD 75/b level from 2 April.
Two factors at hand here: Expectations of softer growth and more oil from OPEC+. One is that global growth in 2025 will still take a hit with softer growth and thus softer oil demand growth due to the US tariff-turmoil. Even if rhetoric has eased. The second is that OPEC+ has upped its production plans with a softer market as a result going forward. The latter message to the market happened almost at the same time as the ”Liberation Day” on 2 April.
Spot market still as tight as it was on 2 April. Still, the front-end market is more or less equally tight today as it was on 2 April. The average Brent, WTI and Dubai 1-3mth time-spread is USD 1.4/b today versus USD 1.5/b on 2. April.
The market setup/pricing is thus that the market is still tight, but that surplus will come. Either because global growth will slow due to US Tariff-turmoil or because OPEC+ will add more barrels.
Will OPEC+ resolve its internal quarrels? Worth remembering on the latter is that the latest more aggressive OPEC+ production growth plan is due to internal quarrels over quota breaches by Iraq and Kazakhstan. OPEC+ could potentially ease those growth plans just as quickly if the internal quarrel is resolved.
Brent crude in EUR/barrel is now trading at the nominal level from 2018-2019. That is nominal! Not taking account of any kind of inflation which cumulatively is up 20-30% since primo 2018. The average, nominal Brent crude oil price in 2018-2019 was EUR 59.1/b. The front-month Brent crude oil price is now EUR 58.4/b. And Brent forward 36mth is only EUR 55.5/b and in real terms one could subtract some 5-10% for the next three years from that nominal forward price. Quite sweet for consumers!
Brent has rebounded along with equities (here US Russel 2000 index in orange), but the rebound in oil has become more hesitant the latest days. Brent still trading USD 8.5/b below its pre ”Liberation Day” of USD 75/b
Brent crude forward curves. Today versus 2 April (’Liberation Day’). Still a tight current market but now with expectation that surplus is coming.
The Brent crude oil price versus the average Brent, WTI and Dubai 1-3mth time-spread. The latter is today on par with where it was on 2 April while the Brent 1mth price is down USD 8.5/b.
Brent crude in EUR/b is down to its 2018-2019 nominal price level. Not bad for euro-based oil consumers!!
Yearly averages for Brent crude in EUR/barrel. The Brent 1mth in EUR/barrel is today trading below its nominal average from 2018-2019 of EUR 59.1/b. And 36mth forward Brent is trading at only EUR 55.5/b. And that is nominally both ways. Add in some 20-30% inflation since primo 2018 and 5-10% additional inflation next three years. Think real terms!
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Oljepriserna slaktas på samtidiga negativa faktorer
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Guld kostar över 3100 USD per uns och 1 miljoner kronor per kilo
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Tariffs deepen economic concerns – significantly weighing on crude oil prices
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Två samtal om det aktuella läget på råvarumarknaden
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Quadruple whammy! Brent crude down $13 in four days
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Lowest since Dec 2021. Kazakhstan likely reason for OPEC+ surprise hike in May
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Brent on a rollercoaster between bullish sanctions and bearish tariffs. Tariffs and demand side fears in focus today
-
Nyheter1 vecka sedan
Ingenting stoppar guldets uppgång, nu 3400 USD per uns