Analys
The crude oil market in June – Less of a crowded place
Saudi Arabia today reduced its official selling prices (OSPs) to Asia in June and crude oil prices are bouncing 6-9% on the back of that news. It signals that Saudi Arabia sees the June crude oil market as less of a crowded place and that it will be easier for the producer to place its desired volumes into the market. In a slight parallel to this we think that it is unlikely to be a wall of surplus oil banging on the door of Cushing Oklahoma in June of a comparable magnitude of May. There is probably a limited risk for a repetition of the crash to -$40/bl for the WTI June contract when it rolls off in only 9 trading days on May 19.
Crude oil prices have today been trading a little higher and a little lower until they jumped up 6-9% as Saudi Arabia increased its official selling prices for June versus other benchmarks. Higher official selling prices (OSPs) signals that Saudi Arabia no longer is seeking to push oil into the market at almost any price.
We all know that Saudi Arabia is cutting production down to 8.5 m bl/d but what this is saying is that Saudi sees the June crude oil market as less of a crowded place than before. It will need to work less hard to get oil out the door in June in the amounts it desires.
The WTI May contract crashed oil prices on April 20th. Then prices fumbled around for a week or so before a rally kick-started at the very end of April on the back of emerging signs of demand recovery, cuts by OPEC+ and declines by non-OPEC+ producers. On Tuesday the Brent front-month contract closed above $30/bl for the first time since 13th April before taking a little breather yesterday.
It is now only 9 trading days left until the WTI June contract rolls off and expires on May 19. Attention is again coming back to what happened on April 20 when the WTI May contract expired and traded down to -$40/bl before closing at -$37/bl. The market is concerned that we might get the same kind of end-of-contract disturbances for the June contract as we got for the May contract.
If so, it is highly unlikely that we would see -$40/bl again since the market now is prepared and knows such an event might happen. It is still possible that the WTI June contract could come under intense selling pressure over the coming 9 trading days as long positions move to exit.
The special thing about the WTI contract is of course that it is based and priced in-land in Cushing Oklahoma in the US. It is land-locked with flows in and out of the storage hub going by pipelines. If inventories in Cushing are full and pipes out of Cushing are full then prices can crash.
Inventories in Cushing Oklahoma have been on a continuous rise for 9 weeks. Inventories there have risen 28 m bl over this period and as of last week they stood at 65.5 m bl which is slightly below the total capacity of 76.1 m bl and on par with levels in 2016 and early 2017. Last week inventories rose by 2.1 m bl in the hub. In all practical terms the hub is now more or less full.
The number of open positions in the WTI June contract yesterday stood at 239 m bl with a comparable amount of long versus short positions. If the 239 m bl long-side of this equation decides to take these contracts to delivery in June the holders of these contracts will actually receive physical volumes in the Cushing Oklahoma physical location.
When the WTI May contract crashed to -$40/bl on April 20 there was an open position of 109 m bl at the start of the trading day. There were basically no buyers for the long positions who wanted and needed to exit since inventories were more or less fully booked for May with nowhere to take physical delivery.
At the moment we see that Cushing inventories are close to full and still rising though the growth rate in inventories is slowing since we are moving towards total capacity.
The WTI June contract however is about June and not about May. The question is thus what are the storage needs in June? How are the bookings in June? Will surplus oil just continue to flush into Cushing also in June with all pipes in and out of the hub clogged by surplus? Probably not.
Delivered oil products in the US last week stood at 25% below last year which is equal to a decline of close to 5 m bl/d. This is terribly bad, but still better than a YoY decline of 6 m bl/d in mid-April.
But demand in the US is on its way back and demand will by June most definitely be better than it is now. Maybe down only 2-3 m bl/d YoY (which is still exceptionally weak).
Supply in the US and Canada is however declining rapidly and is expected to be down by 3.5 to 4.5 m bl/d versus pre-Corona levels already in the Month of May. It turns out that shutting down a shale oil well is easy, quick and is not damaging to the overall production of the well when it is opened at a later stage.
So, if US demand is back up to within 2-3 m bl/d versus normal in June and supply in the US and Canada is down by 3.5 to 4.5 m bl/d already in May, then there shouldn’t be a massive wall of oil banging on the door of Cushing Oklahoma to get in in June as was the case in May. As such bookings for Cushing Oklahoma inventory in June should be much less strained in June than in May even if we still see rising inventories there right now.
This lowers the risk significantly for a price crash repetition on the 19th of May when the June contract rolls off comparable to what happened to the WTI May contract on the 20th of April.
US Cushing Oklahoma oil inventories rose another 2.1 m bl/d last week to 65.5 m bl which is on par with levels from 2016 and 2017 and only about 10 m bl below max storage capacity of 76.1 m bl. Inventories are in all practical terms full.
Analys
Brent prices slip on USD surge despite tight inventory conditions
Brent crude prices dropped by USD 1.4 per barrel yesterday evening, sliding from USD 74.2 to USD 72.8 per barrel overnight. However, prices have ticked slightly higher in early trading this morning and are currently hovering around USD 73.3 per barrel.
Yesterday’s decline was primarily driven by a significant strengthening of the U.S. dollar, fueled by expectations of fewer interest rate cuts by the Fed in the coming year. While the Fed lowered borrowing costs as anticipated, it signaled a more cautious approach to rate reductions in 2025. This pushed the U.S. dollar to its strongest level in over two years, raising the cost of commodities priced in dollars.
Earlier in the day (yesterday), crude prices briefly rose following reports of continued declines in U.S. commercial crude oil inventories (excl. SPR), which fell by 0.9 million barrels last week to 421.0 million barrels. This level is approximately 6% below the five-year average for this time of year, highlighting persistently tight market conditions.
In contrast, total motor gasoline inventories saw a significant build of 2.3 million barrels but remain 3% below the five-year average. A closer look reveals that finished gasoline inventories declined, while blending components inventories increased.
Distillate (diesel) fuel inventories experienced a substantial draw of 3.2 million barrels and are now approximately 7% below the five-year average. Overall, total commercial petroleum inventories recorded a net decline of 3.2 million barrels last week, underscoring tightening market conditions across key product categories.
Despite the ongoing drawdowns in U.S. crude and product inventories, global oil prices have remained range-bound since mid-October. Market participants are balancing a muted outlook for Chinese demand and rising production from non-OPEC+ sources against elevated geopolitical risks. The potential for stricter sanctions on Iranian oil supply, particularly as Donald Trump prepares to re-enter the White House, has introduced an additional layer of uncertainty.
We remain cautiously optimistic about the oil market balance in 2025 and are maintaining our Brent price forecast of an average USD 75 per barrel for the year. We believe the market has both fundamental and technical support at these levels.
Analys
Oil falling only marginally on weak China data as Iran oil exports starts to struggle
Up 4.7% last week on US Iran hawkishness and China stimulus optimism. Brent crude gained 4.7% last week and closed on a high note at USD 74.49/b. Through the week it traded in a USD 70.92 – 74.59/b range. Increased optimism over China stimulus together with Iran hawkishness from the incoming Donald Trump administration were the main drivers. Technically Brent crude broke above the 50dma on Friday. On the upside it has the USD 75/b 100dma and on the downside it now has the 50dma at USD 73.84. It is likely to test both of these in the near term. With respect to the Relative Strength Index (RSI) it is neither cold nor warm.
Lower this morning as China November statistics still disappointing (stimulus isn’t here in size yet). This morning it is trading down 0.4% to USD 74.2/b following bearish statistics from China. Retail sales only rose 3% y/y and well short of Industrial production which rose 5.4% y/y, painting a lackluster picture of the demand side of the Chinese economy. This morning the Chinese 30-year bond rate fell below the 2% mark for the first time ever. Very weak demand for credit and investments is essentially what it is saying. Implied demand for oil down 2.1% in November and ytd y/y it was down 3.3%. Oil refining slipped to 5-month low (Bloomberg). This sets a bearish tone for oil at the start of the week. But it isn’t really killing off the oil price either except pushing it down a little this morning.
China will likely choose the US over Iranian oil as long as the oil market is plentiful. It is becoming increasingly apparent that exports of crude oil from Iran is being disrupted by broadening US sanctions on tankers according to Vortexa (Bloomberg). Some Iranian November oil cargoes still remain undelivered. Chinese buyers are increasingly saying no to sanctioned vessels. China import around 90% of Iranian crude oil. Looking forward to the Trump administration the choice for China will likely be easy when it comes to Iranian oil. China needs the US much more than it needs Iranian oil. At leas as long as there is plenty of oil in the market. OPEC+ is currently holds plenty of oil on the side-line waiting for room to re-enter. So if Iran goes out, then other oil from OPEC+ will come back in. So there won’t be any squeeze in the oil market and price shouldn’t move all that much up.
Analys
Brent crude inches higher as ”Maximum pressure on Iran” could remove all talk of surplus in 2025
Brent crude inch higher despite bearish Chinese equity backdrop. Brent crude traded between 72.42 and 74.0 USD/b yesterday before closing down 0.15% on the day at USD 73.41/b. Since last Friday Brent crude has gained 3.2%. This morning it is trading in marginal positive territory (+0.3%) at USD 73.65/b. Chinese equities are down 2% following disappointing signals from the Central Economic Work Conference. The dollar is also 0.2% stronger. None of this has been able to pull oil lower this morning.
”Maximum pressure on Iran” are the signals from the incoming US administration. Last time Donald Trump was president he drove down Iranian oil exports to close to zero as he exited the JCPOA Iranian nuclear deal and implemented maximum sanctions. A repeat of that would remove all talk about a surplus oil market next year leaving room for the rest of OPEC+ as well as the US to lift production a little. It would however probably require some kind of cooperation with China in some kind of overall US – China trade deal. Because it is hard to prevent oil flowing from Iran to China as long as China wants to buy large amounts.
Mildly bullish adjustment from the IEA but still with an overall bearish message for 2025. The IEA came out with a mildly bullish adjustment in its monthly Oil Market Report yesterday. For 2025 it adjusted global demand up by 0.1 mb/d to 103.9 mb/d (+1.1 mb/d y/y growth) while it also adjusted non-OPEC production down by 0.1 mb/d to 71.9 mb/d (+1.7 mb/d y/y). As a result its calculated call-on-OPEC rose by 0.2 mb/d y/y to 26.3 mb/d.
Overall the IEA still sees a market in 2025 where non-OPEC production grows considerably faster (+1.7 mb/d y/y) than demand (+1.1 mb/d y/y) which requires OPEC to cut its production by close to 700 kb/d in 2025 to keep the market balanced.
The IEA treats OPEC+ as it if doesn’t exist even if it is 8 years since it was established. The weird thing is that the IEA after 8 full years with the constellation of OPEC+ still calculates and argues as if the wider organisation which was established in December 2016 doesn’t exist. In its oil market balance it projects an increase from FSU of +0.3 mb/d in 2025. But FSU is predominantly part of OPEC+ and thus bound by production targets. Thus call on OPEC+ is only falling by 0.4 mb/d in 2025. In IEA’s calculations the OPEC+ group thus needs to cut production by 0.4 mb/d in 2024 or 0.4% of global demand. That is still a bearish outlook. But error of margin on such calculations are quite large so this prediction needs to be treated with a pinch of salt.
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: OPEC+ meeting postponement adds new uncertainties
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Oklart om drill baby drill-politik ökar USAs oljeproduktion
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Vad den stora uppgången i guldpriset säger om Kina
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Meta vill vara med och bygga 1-4 GW kärnkraft, begär in förslag från kärnkraftsutvecklare
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Kina gör stor satsning på billig kol i Xinjiang
-
Analys2 veckor sedan
Brent crude rises 0.8% on Syria but with no immediate risk to supply
-
Analys2 veckor sedan
OPEC takes center stage, but China’s recovery remains key
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Ytterligare tolv stora industriföretag ansluter till Industrikraft för bygga ny elproduktion i Sverige