Följ oss

Analys

Brent crude in non-USD as expensive as in 2011 to 2014

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

SEB - Prognoser på råvaror - CommodityIn order to reach a consensus and keep the OPEC+ group united the latest proposal on the table for the upcoming meeting of OPEC+ on Friday and Saturday in Vienna is a modest increase of 300 to 600 k bl/d in 2H1. The proposal before the weekend by Saudi Arabia and Russia was an increase of 1.5 m bl/d. What is most imperative in our view is that the group is adaptive to market conditions going forward. Uncertainties on both the supply side and the demand side are significant. In the eyes of emerging markets (but also Norway) the oil price in local currency is today as high as it was when Brent traded at $110/bl from 2011 to 2014 with demand destruction naturally setting in at such a cost level. Rapidly escalating US – China trade tension is adding to global growth headwinds. With large uncertainties on the supply side the group should stay ready to increase production in order to avoid escalating pain for the consumers.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities at SEB

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities

It turns out that Donald Trump’s tweets over the past months that “OPEC is at it again creating artificially high prices” are not just a whim. It is actually one of his core views going back more than 30 years. US lawmakers have tried to pass the NOPEC bill (“Non Oil Producing and Exporting Cartels Act”) for years. It will allow the US Government to sue OPEC for oil market manipulation. Earlier attempts to pass the bill have been blocked by President vetoes. Donald is however one of the big supporters of the bill. This bill is now rolling towards OPEC+ and the group certainly do not want to stir the pot by holding back to much oil creating too high prices.

Price action – Rebounding 2.6% ydy as OPEC+ seen to aim for modest compromise. Sinking back on trade war today

Following Friday’s 3.3% sharp sell-off on the back of Saudi Arabia’s comment that an increase in production is “inevitable” the Brent price yesterday rebounded 2.6% to $75.34/bl as the group was seen to aim for a modest compromise. An increase of 1.5 m bl/d has earlier been seen as the proposal by Russia and Saudi Arabia while the latest proposal said to be discussed is an output hike of 300 to 600 k bl/d. This helped the Brent price to rebound yesterday. This morning Brent is pulling back 0.6% to $74.9/bl following the queue of the sharp sell-off in Asian equities on fear that Donald Trump will add tariffs on an additional $200 billion worth of Chinese goods exported to the US.

Aiming for a compromise but adaption to market conditions will be key

In order to hold the OPEC+ group together and appease Iran, Iraq and Venezuela who have strongly opposed any increase in production the group now seems to aim for a compromise of a modest increase of 300 to 600 k bl/d at the upcoming meeting on Friday and Saturday this week. It has all the time been argued that any revival in production will be gradual and adapted to market conditions. To be reactive and adaptive to market conditions seems to be even more important now due to significant uncertainties for both supply and demand.

The global economy ex the US has been cooling since the start of the year and the US – China trade tension is escalating rapidly with an additional $200 billion worth of exports to the US at risk of getting tariffs. This is not good for global growth and for oil demand growth. The strengthening of the USD, especially versus emerging markets is bad both for global growth and for oil demand growth. An oil price of $75/bl seems fairly modest, neither too hot nor too cold. However, if we measure it in local currencies like the Norwegian krone the oil price now is just as high as it was during the period 2011 to 2014 when Brent crude was trading at around $110/bl. The same goes if we take JPM’s EM currency index and adjust Brent crude prices from July 2010. So in the eyes of the emerging market consumers the oil price today is just as expensive as it was during the 2011 to 2014 period. That means that demand destruction is naturally setting in at these prices for the EM’s. And, since EM’s holds the lion’s share of the world’s oil demand growth this is probably not insignificant. It is thus highly important that OPEC+ is sensitive, adaptive and reactive to oil demand conditions going forward.

The supply side is of course just as challenging to gauge as production in Venezuela is declining rapidly but could as well disrupt entirely and unpredictably. US sanctions towards Iran, a sharp decline in Nigeria’s production in June and increasing violence in Libya where the destruction of two of five crude storage tanks at Ras Lanuf“ may take years” to rebuild are all contributing to a highly unpredictable supply.

For a large share of the world’s consumers the oil price is already as high as it was during 2011 to 2014 and OPEC+ does definitely not want to risk that the oil price moves yet higher as the world economy is already facing challenges. Thus adaptivity to market conditions must be the most imperative goal of OPEC+ at the upcoming meeting this week as the goal of getting OECD inventories down to the rolling five year average has been reached. Thus aim for moderate increase in 2H18, but increase more if needed.

Ch1: The oil price for emerging markets is just as high today as it was in 2011 to 2014
Thus demand destruction is naturally setting in at such a price level with weakness in demand as a result

The oil price for emerging markets is just as high today as it was in 2011 to 2014

Ch2: OPEC+ produced 2 m bl/d less in May than it did in October 2016

On average since the start of 2017 the group has delivered net cuts of 1.5 m bl/d and slightly less than the pledged 1.7 m bl/d

OPEC+ produced 2 m bl/d less in May than it did in October 2016

Ch3: But deliberate cuts were only 1.55 m bl/d while involuntary cuts amounted to 1.3 m bl/d

But deliberate cuts were only 1.55 m bl/d while involuntary cuts amounted to 1.3 m bl/d

Analys

Oil gains as sanctions bite harder than recession fears

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Higher last week and today as sanctions bite harder than recession fears. Brent crude gained 2% last week with a close on Friday of USD 73.63/b. It traded in a range of USD 71.8-74.17/b. It traded mostly higher through the week despite sharp, new selloffs in equities along with US consumer expectations falling to lowest level since 2013 (Consumer Conf. Board Expectations.) together with signals of new tariffs from the White House. Ahead this week looms the ”US Liberation Day” on April 2 when the White House will announce major changes in the country’s trade policy. Equity markets are down across the board this morning while Brent crude has traded higher and lower and is currently up 0.5% at USD 74.0/b at the moment.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

New US sanctions towards Iran and Venezuela and threats of new sanctions towards Russia. New sanctions on Venezuela and Iran are helping to keep the market tight. Oil production in Venezuela reached 980 kb/d in February following a steady rise from 310 kb/d in mid-2020 while it used to produce 2.3 mb/d up to 2016. Trump last week allowed Chevron to import oil from Venezuela until 27 May. But he also said that any country taking oil or gas from Venezuela after 2 April will face 25% tariffs on any goods exported into the US. Trump is also threatening to sanction Russian oil further if Putin doesn’t move towards a peace solution with Ukraine.

The OPEC+ to meet on Saturday 5 April to decide whether to lift production in May or not. The OPEC+ Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee will meet on Saturday 5 April to review market conditions, compliance by the members versus their production targets and most importantly decide whether they shall increase production further in May following first production hike in April. We find it highly likely that they will continue to lift production also in May.

OPEC(+) crashed the oil price twice to curb US shale, but it kicked back quickly. OPEC(+) has twice crashed the oil price in an effort to hurt and disable booming US shale oil production. First in 2014/15/16 and then in the spring of 2020. The first later led to the creation of OPEC+ through the Declaration of Cooperation (DoC) in the autumn of 2016. The second was in part driven by Covid-19 as well as a quarrel between Russia and Saudi Arabia over market strategy. But the fundamental reason for that quarrel and the crash in the oil price was US shale oil producers taking more and more market share.

The experience by OPEC+ through both of these two events was that US shale oil quickly kicked back even bigger and better yielding very little for OPEC+ to cheer about.

OPEC+ has harvested an elevated oil price but is left with a large spare capacity. The group has held back large production volumes since Spring 2020. It yielded the group USD 100/b in 2022 (with some help from the war in Ukraine), USD 81/b on average in 2023/24 and USD 75/b so far this year. The group is however left with a large spare capacity with little room to place it back into the market without crashing the price. It needs non-OPEC+ in general and US shale oil especially to yield room for it to re-enter. 

A quick crash and painful blow to US shale oil is no longer the strategy. The strategy this time is clearly very different from the previous two times. It is no longer about trying to give US shale oil producers a quick, painful blow in the hope that the sector will stay down for an extended period. It is instead a lengthier process of finding the pain-point of US shale oil players (and other non-OPEC+ producers) through a gradual increase in production by OPEC+ and a gradual decline in the oil price down to the point where non-OPEC+ in general and US liquids production especially will gradually tick lower and yield room to the reentry of OPEC+ spare capacity. It does not look like a plan for a crash and a rush, but instead a tedious process where OPEC+ will gradually force its volumes back into the market.

Where is the price pain-point for US shale oil players? The Brent crude oil price dropped from USD 84/b over the year to September last year to USD 74/b on average since 1 September. The values for US WTI were USD 79/b and USD 71/b respectively. A drop of USD 9/b for both crudes. There has however been no visible reaction in the US drilling rig count following the USD 9/b fall. The US drilling rig count has stayed unchanged at around 480 rigs since mid-2024 with the latest count at 484 operating rigs. While US liquids production growth is slowing, it is still set to grow by 580 kb/d in 2025 and 445 kb/d in 2026 (US EIA).

US shale oil average cost-break-even at sub USD 50/b (BNEF). Industry says it is USD 65/b. BNEF last autumn estimated that all US shale oil production fields had a cost-break-even below USD 60/b with a volume weighted average just below USD 50/b while conventional US onshore oil had a break-even of USD 65/b. A recent US Dallas Fed report which surveyed US oil producers did however yield a response that the US oil industry on average needed USD 65/b to break even. That is more than USD 15/b higher than the volume weighted average of the BNEF estimates.

The WTI 13-to-24-month strip is at USD 64/b. Probably the part of the curve controlling activity. As such it needs to move lower to curb US shale oil activity. The WTI price is currently at USD 69.7/b. But the US shale oil industry today works on a ”12-month drilling first, then fracking after” production cycle. When it considers whether to drill more or less or not, it is typically on a deferred 12-month forward price basis. The average WTI price for months 13 to 24 is today USD 64/b. The price signal from this part of the curve is thus already down at the pain-point highlighted by the US shale oil industry. In order to yield zero growth and possibly contraction in US shale oil production, this part of the curve needs to move below that point.

The real pain-point is where we’ll see US drilling rig count starting to decline. We still don’t know whether the actual average pain-point is around USD 50/b as BNEF estimate it is or whether it is closer to USD 65/b which the US shale oil bosses say it is. The actual pain-point is where we’ll see further decline in US drilling rig count. And there has been no visible change in the rig count since mid-2024. The WTI 13-to-24-month prices need to fall further to reveal where the US shale oil industry’ actual pain-point is. And then a little bit more in order to slow production growth further and likely into some decline to make room for reactivation of OPEC+ spare capacity.

The WTI forward price curve. The average of 13 to 24 month is now USD 64.3/b.

The WTI forward price curve. The average of 13 to 24 month is now USD 64.3/b.
Source: SEB graph and highlights, Bloomberg data

The average 13-to-24-month prices on the WTI price curve going back to primo January 2022. Recently dropping below USD 65/b for some extended period.

The average 13-to-24-month prices on the WTI price curve going back to primo January 2022. Recently dropping below USD 65/b for some extended period.
Source: SEB graph and highlights, Bloomberg data
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Brent Edges Lower After Resisting Equity Slump – Sanctions, Saudi Pricing in Focus

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent has defied bearish equities for three days but is losing its stamina today. Brent gained 0.3% yesterday with a close of USD 74.03/b, the highest close since 27 February and almost at the high of the day. It traded as low as USD 73.23/b. Brent has now defied the equity selloff three days in a row by instead ticking steadily higher. A sign of current spot tightness. This morning however it is losing some of its stamina and is down 0.5% at USD 73.7/b along with negative equities and yet higher gold prices.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

The new US Iran sanctions is creating frictions in getting its oil to market and helps keeping oil market tight. Part of the current tightness is due to the new US sanctions on Iran which. Ships containing 17 mb of its oil now sits idle east of Malaysia waiting (Bloomberg) for ship-to-ship transfers with China teapot refineries the normal final destination. But the latest US sanctions has probably made these refineries much more cautious. More friction before Iranian oil is reaching its final destination if at all. Tighter market.

Lower Saudi OSPs for May is expected. A signal of a softer market ahead as OPEC+ lifts production. Saudi Aramco is expected to reduce it official selling price (OSPs) for Arab Light to Asia for May deliveries by USD 2/b. A measure to make its oil more competitive in relative to other crudes suppliers. It is also a sign of a softer market ahead. Naturally so since OPEC+ is set to lift production in April and also most likely in May. If Saudi Aramco reduces its OSPs to Asia for May across its segments of crudes, then it is a signal it is expecting softer oil market conditions. But news today is only discussing Arab Light while the main tightness int the market today is centered around medium sour crude segment. A lowering of the OSPs for the heavier and more sour grades will thus be a more forceful bearish signal.

Front-end backwardation may ease as the Brent May contract rolls off early next week. The Brent May future will roll off early next week. It will be interesting to see how that affects the front-end 1-3mth backwardation as it is shifted out into summer where a softer market is expected.

Brent is boring like crazy with 30dma annualized volatility of just 21%. Waiting for something to happen.

Brent is boring like crazy with 30dma annualized volatility of just 21%. Waiting for something to happen.
Source: SEB graph and calculations, Bloomberg data

Brent crude has defied three days of bearish equity markets and ticked higher instead. Caving in a bit this morning with yet another day of bearish equities and bullish gold.

Brent crude has defied three days of bearish equity markets and ticked higher instead. Caving in a bit this morning with yet another day of bearish equities and bullish gold.
Source: Bloomberg graph with SEB highlights.
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Crude inventories fall, but less than API signal

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Last week, U.S. crude oil refinery inputs averaged 15.8 million barrels per day, an increase of 87k bl/day from the previous week. Refineries operated at 87% of their total operable capacity during the period. Gasoline production declined, averaging 9.2 million barrels per day (m bl/d), while distillate (diesel) production also edged lower to 4.5 m bl/d.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

U.S. crude oil imports averaged 6.2 m bl/d, up 810k barrels from the prior week. Over the past four weeks, imports have averaged 5.7 m bl/d, representing an 11% YoY decline compared to the same period last year.

Where we place most of our attention – and what continues to influence short-term price dynamics in both WTI and Brent crude – remains U.S. crude and product inventories. Total commercial petroleum inventories (excl. SPR) rose by 3.2 m bl, a relatively modest build that is unlikely to trigger major price reactions. Brent crude traded at around USD 73.9 per barrel when the data was released yesterday afternoon (16:30 CEST) and has since slid by USD 0.4/bl to USD 73.5/bl this morning, still among the highest price levels seen in March 2025.

Commercial crude oil inventories (excl. SPR) fell by 3.3 m bl, contrasting with last week’s build and offering some price support, though the draw was less severe than the API’s reported -4.6 m bl. Crude inventories now stand at 433.6 m bl, about 5% below the five-year average for this time of year. Gasoline inventories declined by 1.4 m bl (API: -3.3 m bl), though they remain 2% above the five-year average. Diesel inventories fell by 0.4 m bl (API: -1.3 m bl), leaving them 7% below seasonal norms.

Over the past four weeks, total products supplied – a proxy for U.S. demand – averaged 20.2 m bl/d, up 0.5% compared to the same period last year. Gasoline supplied averaged 8.9 m bl/d, down 0.2%, while diesel supplied came in at 3.9 m bl/d, up 1.8%. Jet fuel demand also showed strength, rising 3.9% over the same four-week period.

USD DOE Inventories
US Crude Inventories exkl SPR in million barrels
Fortsätt läsa

Centaur

Guldcentralen

Fokus

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Populära