Följ oss

Analys

One year after USD -37.63/bl

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror
SEB - Prognoser på råvaror - Commodity

It is exactly one year since WTI crashed to USD -37.63/bl. Yes, it was probably trading games involved. Yes, it was highly specific to storage and pipeline constraints at the pricing point of WTI in Cushing Oklahoma as Brent crude only fell to USD 19.33/bl. Yes, it was a price war between Russia and Saudi Arabia which broke out after the 6 March meeting. Yes, it was Covid-19 lock-downs which killed demand. But what really stands out looking back was that you don’t steal from the King. You don’t steal from OPEC. You don’t steal market shares from the world’ lowest cost producers. Try that again and you’ll get punished again.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities at SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

The price war between Russia and Saudi Arabia which broke out after the 6 March meeting last year looked like an ill considered tantrum from a hot tempered Muhammed bin Salman in Saudi Arabia lashing out against Russia which did not want to play the ”hold back production, loose market share, get higher prices” game any more. And maybe such a tantrum was really what happen. Who knows.

But the underlying fundamentals story here was that US liquids production was growing like crazy. From Sep 2016 to Jan 2020 it grew by 6.6 m bl/d. And Russia was sick of holding back production forever while seeing US taking more and more market share. The only reason for why this could go on as long as it did was because there was an almost comparable large decline in supply from the key OPEC producers being Venezuela, Iran and Libya which lost 4.5 m bl/d from mid-2017 to mid-2020. Thus yielding room for the incredible US production growth.

It was like the business strategy of US shale oil players was: ”Let’s steel market share from the lowest cost producers in the world being OPEC/OPEC+. Fundamentally that is a no-go strategy to start. Though it can go on for a little while before it falls apart. And it did go on for a little while but largely because of the very large decline from Venezuela, Libya and Iran. But looking back it is obvious that it had to end.

OPEC knows very well that the oil price is all about controlling supply. There is an infinite amount of oil under ground. Make sure it is not too much above ground and you’ll get rich. I.e. control your capex spending. US shale oil players obviously have been nowhere near thinking along such lines.

Looking forward is not all such a great picture if we base it on 1) The ongoing return of production from Iran and Libya. I.e. the reversal of the losses within OPEC from mid-2017 which enabled the US shale oil boom to go on as long as it did and 2) The projected non-OPEC production growth from the US EIA in its March STEO pointing to a very strong rebound in both US shale oil and total non-OPEC production towards the end of 2022.

The key message from 20 April 2020 is: Do not steal from the King. Do not try to steal market shares from the worlds lowest cost producers (it is stupid). If you do you will get punished again. In a world where oil demand is growing at around 1% over the coming years you should not lay plans for growing your production at 2% or 5% or 10% per year. Because if you do it fundamentally means that you must steel market share from someone. It for sure won’t be the lowest cost producers.

The end-game though could be that there is only one way to tame the production from non-OPEC and that is a lower price.

Brent and WTI crude prices and the crazy WTI crash to USD -37.63/bl. The recovery since then is all due to deep cuts in production by OPEC+ and still is. If OPEC+ hadn’t still been holding back significant volumes then we would have had no more than USD 30-40/bl today.

Brent and WTI crude prices

Crazy US hydrocarbon liquids growth. From a low in Sep-2016 it grew by 6.6 m bl/d before the collapse in Q1-2020. According to the EIA’s STEO from March it is set to revive and reach the same gain at the end of 2022 though the EIA STEO from April has modified that a bit lower again.

The same chart for changes in total non-OPEC production since Sep-2016 gives much the same picture. What we see is that it is not only US production which increased but also other non-OPEC producers lifted increased production in this period. But mostly it is US.

And the maga-growth in non-OPEC production did of course take their market share from OPEC. Massive decline in production by three OPEC members Iran, Venezuela and Iran. Libya has now kicked back with more to come and Iran is just about to move into the market again as signals from the ongoing Vienna talks on the revival of JCPOA (Iran nuclear deal) are positive with all sides at the table wanting the same thing. Saudi Arabia, Israel and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard may not want success but they are not sitting at the negotiation table in Vienna. A strong rebound in non-OPEC production as envisioned by the EIA March STEO forecast will be outright impossible with a production revival from these three countries.

Massive decline in production by three OPEC members Iran, Venezuela and Iran.

Analys

Brent crude ticks higher on tension, but market structure stays soft

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent crude has climbed roughly USD 1.5-2 per barrel since Friday, yet falling USD 0.3 per barrel this mornig and currently trading near USD 67.25/bbl after yesterday’s climb. While the rally reflects short-term geopolitical tension, price action has been choppy, and crude remains locked in a broader range – caught between supply-side pressure and spot resilience.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

Prices have been supported by renewed Ukrainian drone strikes targeting Russian infrastructure. Over the weekend, falling debris triggered a fire at the 20mtpa Kirishi refinery, following last week’s attack on the key Primorsk terminal.

Argus estimates that these attacks have halted ish 300 kbl/d of Russian refining capacity in August and September. While the market impact is limited for now, the action signals Kyiv’s growing willingness to disrupt oil flows – supporting a soft geopolitical floor under prices.

The political environment is shifting: the EU is reportedly considering sanctions on Indian and Chinese firms facilitating Russian crude flows, while the U.S. has so far held back – despite Bessent warning that any action from Washington depends on broader European participation. Senator Graham has also publicly criticized NATO members like Slovakia and Hungary for continuing Russian oil imports.

It’s worth noting that China and India remain the two largest buyers of Russian barrels since the invasion of Ukraine. While New Delhi has been hit with 50% secondary tariffs, Beijing has been spared so far.

Still, the broader supply/demand balance leans bearish. Futures markets reflect this: Brent’s prompt spread (gauge of near-term tightness) has narrowed to the current USD 0.42/bl, down from USD 0.96/bl two months ago, pointing to weakening backwardation.

This aligns with expectations for a record surplus in 2026, largely driven by the faster-than-anticipated return of OPEC+ barrels to market. OPEC+ is gathering in Vienna this week to begin revising member production capacity estimates – setting the stage for new output baselines from 2027. The group aims to agree on how to define “maximum sustainable capacity,” with a proposal expected by year-end.

While the IEA pegs OPEC+ capacity at 47.9 million barrels per day, actual output in August was only 42.4 million barrels per day. Disagreements over data and quota fairness (especially from Iraq and Nigeria) have already delayed this process. Angola even quit the group last year after being assigned a lower target than expected. It also remains unclear whether Russia and Iraq can regain earlier output levels due to infrastructure constraints.

Also, macro remains another key driver this week. A 25bp Fed rate cut is widely expected tomorrow (Wednesday), and commodities in general could benefit a potential cut.

Summing up: Brent crude continues to drift sideways, finding near-term support from geopolitics and refining strength. But with surplus building and market structure softening, the upside may remain capped.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Volatile but going nowhere. Brent crude circles USD 66 as market weighs surplus vs risk

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent crude is essentially flat on the week, but after a volatile ride. Prices started Monday near USD 65.5/bl, climbed steadily to a mid-week high of USD 67.8/bl on Wednesday evening, before falling sharply – losing about USD 2/bl during Thursday’s session.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

Brent is currently trading around USD 65.8/bl, right back where it began. The volatility reflects the market’s ongoing struggle to balance growing surplus risks against persistent geopolitical uncertainty and resilient refined product margins. Thursday’s slide snapped a three-day rally and came largely in response to a string of bearish signals, most notably from the IEA’s updated short-term outlook.

The IEA now projects record global oversupply in 2026, reinforcing concerns flagged earlier by the U.S. EIA, which already sees inventories building this quarter. The forecast comes just days after OPEC+ confirmed it will continue returning idle barrels to the market in October – albeit at a slower pace of +137,000 bl/d. While modest, the move underscores a steady push to reclaim market share and adds to supply-side pressure into year-end.

Thursday’s price drop also followed geopolitical incidences: Israeli airstrikes reportedly targeted Hamas leadership in Doha, while Russian drones crossed into Polish airspace – events that initially sent crude higher as traders covered short positions.

Yet, sentiment remains broadly cautious. Strong refining margins and low inventories at key pricing hubs like Europe continue to support the downside. Chinese stockpiling of discounted Russian barrels and tightness in refined product markets – especially diesel – are also lending support.

On the demand side, the IEA revised up its 2025 global demand growth forecast by 60,000 bl/d to 740,000 bl/d YoY, while leaving 2026 unchanged at 698,000 bl/d. Interestingly, the agency also signaled that its next long-term report could show global oil demand rising through 2050.

Meanwhile, OPEC offered a contrasting view in its latest Monthly Oil Market Report, maintaining expectations for a supply deficit both this year and next, even as its members raise output. The group kept its demand growth estimates for 2025 and 2026 unchanged at 1.29 million bl/d and 1.38 million bl/d, respectively.

We continue to watch whether the bearish supply outlook will outweigh geopolitical risk, and if Brent can continue to find support above USD 65/bl – a level increasingly seen as a soft floor for OPEC+ policy.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Waiting for the surplus while we worry about Israel and Qatar

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent crude makes some gains as Israel’s attack on Hamas in Qatar rattles markets. Brent crude spiked to a high of USD 67.38/b yesterday as Israel made a strike on Hamas in Qatar. But it  wasn’t able to hold on to that level and only closed up 0.6% in the end at USD 66.39/b. This morning it is starting on the up with a gain of 0.9% at USD 67/b. Still rattled by Israel’s attack on Hamas in Qatar yesterday. Brent is getting some help on the margin this morning with Asian equities higher and copper gaining half a percent. But the dark cloud of surplus ahead is nonetheless hanging over the market with Brent trading two dollar lower than last Tuesday.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Geopolitical risk premiums in oil rarely lasts long unless actual supply disruption kicks in. While Israel’s attack on Hamas in Qatar is shocking, the geopolitical risk lifting crude oil yesterday and this morning is unlikely to last very long as such geopolitical risk premiums usually do not last long unless real disruption kicks in.

US API data yesterday indicated a US crude and product stock build last week of 3.1 mb. The US API last evening released partial US oil inventory data indicating that US crude stocks rose 1.3 mb and middle distillates rose 1.5 mb while gasoline rose 0.3 mb. In total a bit more than 3 mb increase. US crude and product stocks usually rise around 1 mb per week this time of year. So US commercial crude and product stock rose 2 mb over the past week adjusted for the seasonal norm. Official and complete data are due today at 16:30.

A 2 mb/week seasonally adj. US stock build implies a 1 – 1.4 mb/d global surplus if it is persistent. Assume that if the global oil market is running a surplus then some 20% to 30% of that surplus ends up in US commercial inventories. A 2 mb seasonally adjusted inventory build equals 286 kb/d. Divide by 0.2 to 0.3 and we get an implied global surplus of 950 kb/d to 1430 kb/d. A 2 mb/week seasonally adjusted build in US oil inventories is close to noise unless it is a persistent pattern every week.

US IEA STEO oil report: Robust surplus ahead and Brent averaging USD 51/b in 2026. The US EIA yesterday released its monthly STEO oil report. It projected a large and persistent surplus ahead. It estimates a global surplus of 2.2 m/d from September to December this year. A 2.4 mb/d surplus in Q1-26 and an average surplus for 2026 of 1.6 mb/d resulting in an average Brent crude oil price of USD 51/b next year. And that includes an assumption where OPEC crude oil production only averages 27.8 mb/d in 2026 versus 27.0 mb/d in 2024 and 28.6 mb/d in August.

Brent will feel the bear-pressure once US/OECD stocks starts visible build. In the meanwhile the oil market sits waiting for this projected surplus to materialize in US and OECD inventories. Once they visibly starts to build on a consistent basis, then Brent crude will likely quickly lose altitude. And unless some unforeseen supply disruption kicks in, it is bound to happen.

US IEA STEO September report. In total not much different than it was in January

US IEA STEO September report. In total not much different than it was in January
Source: SEB graph. US IEA data

US IEA STEO September report. US crude oil production contracting in 2026, but NGLs still growing. Close to zero net liquids growth in total.

US IEA STEO September report. US crude oil production contracting in 2026, but NGLs still growing. Close to zero net liquids growth in total.
Source: SEB graph. US IEA data
Fortsätt läsa

Guldcentralen

Aktier

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Populära