Analys
Will OPEC drop the ball in 2018?
OECD inventories rose 18.6 mb in April marginally up y/y. OPEC has not been able to draw OECD inventories down yet which is a disappointment to the market. Weekly data have shown a substantial draw since mid-March. Some of that draw has been in floating storage and have thus not shown up in the OECD inventories yet.
The IEA estimated that the need for OPEC’s oil was 32.1 mb/d in H1-17. This is more or less exactly what Bloomberg statistics tells us that OPEC produced on average year to May 2017. Thus no inventory draws or gains of any magnitude in H1-17.
For the second half of 2017 the IEA calculates that the market will need 33.4 mb/d of oil from OPEC, a full 1.3 mb/d higher than in H1-17 due to seasonal demand effects and refining maintenance seasonality. Maintenance of refineries has been unusually high so far this year. But these are now coming back in operation.
If we assume that OPEC keeps production at current production of 32.2 mb/d through H2-17 (baring potentially further production revival in Libya and Nigeria) then this will drive inventories some 200 mb lower in H2-17. OECD inventories currently have a surplus of some 300 mb above normal. Thus a drawdown of some 200 mb (if taken out of the OECD inventories) would drive inventories a good way towards normality and lead to a flatter crude oil price curve.
As we have argued many times it is the medium term WTI forward curve which tells the US shale oil players what kind of cash flow they can lock in with a forward hedge if they decide to drill an additional well. The medium term WTI forward curve (proxy 18 mth contract) is the real incentive lever.
Except for a brief flash sell-off in August 2016, the 18 mth forward WTI price has not touched down to $47/b since April 2016. It was when this forward contract broke enduringly above $47/b for more than 6 weeks last spring that the US oil rig count started to rise and has been rising continuously since then.
While the IEA implicitly predicts a substantial inventory draw in H2-17 they see a different picture for 2018 where they estimate that the need for OPEC’s oil is no more than 32.6 mb/d. OPEC now produces 32.2 mb/d while it holds back 1.2 mb/d and thus has a natural production of 33.4 mb/d. Thus OPEC will need to hold back at least 0.8 mb/d all through 2018 in order to prevent inventories from rising again. And if Iraq’s production capacity rises to 5 mb/d by the end of 2017 versus current production of 4.45 mb/d or if Libya’s and Nigeria’s production revives even further then OPEC will have to hold back more.
The IEA basically says that inventories will draw substantially in H2-17 due to OPEC cuts. Then however in 2018 OPEC will have to maintain more or less the same size of cuts just in order to prevent inventories from rising again.
Drawdown in inventories is likely to flatten the forward curve in H2-17. Currently there is a $3/b discount for the 1mth contract versus the 18 mth contract WTI crude. By the end of the year the 1mth contract is likely to trade much closer to the 18 mth contract or even above depending of the magnitude of drawdown.
The level of the WTI 18 mth contract which now currently trades at $47.5/b is however the big question. Will it shift higher as well? Usually the whole forward curve shifts higher when inventories draw down and the spot market firms up.
However, IEA is prediction that OPEC needs to cut production all through 2018 as well in order to prevent growing OECD inventories. Thus for every additional shale oil rig being activated through the next 6-12 months means that OPEC will have to hold back even more of its production in 2018.
In our view, while we have a more positive view of the supply/demand balance in 2018 than the IEA, we do not see the need for a single additional shale oil rig to be activated in the US over the next 12 months. In order for this to happen the WTI 18 mth contract needs to stay put at around $47/b over the next 6-12 months. Thus fundamentally, the WTI 18mth contract should not rise above the $47/b level over the next 12 months.
Every additional rig in the US over the next 12 mths is increasing the production-cut burden for OPEC in 2018. It is also increasing the need for the market to believe that OPEC will cut production all through 2018.
The market fear is that the production-cut burden will in the end become too large for OPEC and that it will drop the ball in 2018. Not prolonging the cuts beyond March 2018 and instead opt for volume over price again just as it did in 2014. That is an open question which is itching in the back head of the market.
Ch1: Deeper contango for crude curves
But front end likely to firm in H2-17 as inventories draw down
Ch2: OECD inventories increased in April – big dissapointment
Will decline substantially in H2-17
Ch3: Iraq crude production
It says that its production capacity will reach 5 mb/d end of 2017
Ch4: Nigeria and Libya crude production reviving
Libya NOC says more to come
Ch5: WTI 18 mth forward crude price heads for the US shale oil “price floor” (or rig versus price inflection point) from one year ago.
Is the inflection point still there or is it higher or lower?
The market is asking US shale oil players to stop adding more rigs.
How low will the price need to move in order to make them listen?
Ch6: Deeper rebate for 1mth to 18 mth Brent lately.
Likely to firm in H2-17
Kind regards
Bjarne Schieldrop
Chief analyst, Commodities
SEB Markets
Merchant Banking
Analys
Oil product price pain is set to rise as the Strait of Hormuz stays closed into summer
Market is starting to take US/Iran headlines with a pinch of salt. Brent crude rose $2.8/b yesterday to an official close of $112.1/b. But after that it traded as low as $108.05/b before ending late night at around $109.7/b. Through the day it traded in a range of $106.87 – 112.72/b amid a flurry of news or rumors from Iran and the US. ”US temporary sanctions during negotiations” (falls alarm). ”We will bomb Iran” (not anyhow),… etc. While the market is still fluctuating to this kind of news flow, it is starting to take such headlines with a pinch of salt.

We’ll see. Maybe, maybe not. The Brent M1 contract is trading at $110.2/b this morning which very close to the average ticks through yesterday of $110.4/b.
Trump with bearish, verbal intervention whenever Brent trades above $110/b it seems. What seems to be a pattern is that Trump states something like ”very good negotiations going on with Iran”, ”New leaders in Iran are great,..”, ”Great progress in negotiations,…”, ”Deal in sight,..” etc whenever the Brent M1 contract trades above $110/b. An effort to cool the market. These hot air verbal interventions from Trump used to have a heavy bearish impact on prices, but they now seems to have less and less effect unless they are backed by reality.
As far as we can see there has been no real progress in the negotiations between the US and Iran with both sides still standing by their previous demands.
Iran is getting stronger while the cease fire lasts making a return to war for Trump yet harder. Iran is naturally in constant preparation for a return to war given Trump’s steady threats of bombing Iran again. Iran is naturally doing what ever is possible to prepare for a return to war. And every day the cease fire lasts it is better prepared. This naturally makes it more and more difficult and dangerous for the US to return to warring activity versus Iran as the consequences for energy infrastructure in the Persian Gulf will be more and more severe the longer the cease fire lasts. Israel seems to see it this way as well. That the war is not won and that current frozen state of a cease fire gives Iran opportunity to rebuild military and politically.
Global inventories are drawing down day by day. How much? In the meantime the Strait of Hormuz stays closed. There is varying measures and estimates of how much global inventories are drawing down. Our rough estimate, back of the envelope, is that global inventories are drawing down by at least some 10 mb/d or about 300 mb/d in a balance between loss of supply versus demand destruction. Other estimates we see are a monthly draw of 250-270 mb/d. The IEA only ’measured’ a draw in global observable stocks of 117 mb in April with oil on water rising 53 mb while on shore stocks fell 170 mb. But global stocks are hard to measure with large invisible, unmeasured stocks. As such a back of the envelope approach may be better.
Oil products is what the world is consuming. Oil product prices likely to rise while product stocks fall. Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR) are predominantly crude oil. Discharging oil from OECD SPR stocks, a sharp reduction in Chinese crude imports and a reduction in global refinery throughput of 6-7 mb/d has helped to keep crude oil markets satisfactorily supplied. But global inventories are drawing down none the less. And oil products is really what the world is consuming. So if global refinery throughput stays subdued, then demand will eventually have to match the supply of oil products. The likely path forward this summer is a steady draw down in jet fuel, diesel and gasoline. Higher prices for these. Then, if possible, higher refinery throughput and higher usage of crude in response to very profitable refinery margins. And lastly sharper draw in crude stocks and higher prices for these. But some 6 mb/d of oil products used to be exported through the Strait of Hormuz. And it may not be so easy to ramp up refinery activity across the world to compensate. Especially as Ukraine continues to damage Russian refineries as well as Russian crude production and export facilities.
Watch oil product stocks and prices as well as Brent calendar 2027. What to watch for this summer is thus oil product inventories falling and oil product premiums to crude rising. Another measure to watch is the Brent crude 2027 contract as it rises steadily day by day as the Strait of Hormuz stays closed and global oil inventories decline. The latter is close to the highest level since the start of the war and keeps rising.
The Brent M1 contract and the Brent 2027 prices and current price of jet fuel in Europe (ARA). All in USD/b

Our back of the envelope calculation of the global shortage created by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Note that 3.5 mb/d of discharge from SPR is also a draw. Note also that ’Forced demand loss’ of 2.5 mb/d is probably temporary and will fall back towards zero as logistics are sorted out leaving ’Price demand loss’ to do the job of balancing the market. Thus a shortfall of at least 9 mb/d created by the closure. More if SPR discharge is included and more if Forced demand loss recedes.

Analys
Brent crude up USD 9/bl on the week… ”deal around the corner” narrative fades
Brent is climbing higher. Front-month is at USD 106.3/bl this morning, close to a weekly high and a USD 9/bl jump from Mondays open. This is the move we flagged as a risk earlier in the week: the market shifting from ”a deal is around the corner” to ”this is going to take longer than we thought”.

Analyst Commodities, SEB
During April, rest-of-year Brent remained remarkably stable around USD 90/bl. A stability which rested on one single assumption: the SoH reopens around 1 May. That assumption is now slowly falling apart.
As we highlighted yesterday: every week of delay beyond 1 May adds (theoretically) ish USD 5/bl to the rest-of-year average, as global inventories draw 100 million barrels per week. i.e., a mid-May reopening implies rest-of-year Brent closer to USD 100/bl, and anything pushing into June or July takes us meaningfully higher.
What’s changed in the last 48 hours:
#1: The US military has formally warned that clearing suspected sea mines from SoH could take up to six months. That is a completely different timescale from what the financial market is pricing. Even a political deal tomorrow does not immediately reopen the strait.
#2: Trump has shifted his tone from urgency to ”strategic patience”. In yesterday’s press conference: ”Don’t rush me… I want a great deal.” The market is reading this as a president no longer feeling pressured by timelines, with the naval blockade running in the background.
#3: So far, the military activity is escalating, not de-escalating. Axios reports Iran is laying more mines in SoH. The US 3rd carrier strike group (USS George H.W. Bush) is arriving with two countermine vessels. Trump yesterday ordered the US Navy to destroy any Iranian boats caught laying mines. While CNN reports that the Pentagon is actively drawing up plans to strike Iranian SoH capabilities and individual Iranian military leaders if the ceasefire collapses. i.e., NOT a attitude consistent with an imminent deal!
Spot crude and product prices eased off the early-April highs on a combination of system rerouting and deal optimism. Both now weakening. Goldman estimates April Gulf output is reduced by 14.5 mbl/d, or 57% of pre-war supply, a number that keeps getting worse the longer this drags on.
Demand-side adaptation is ongoing: S. Korea has cut its Middle East crude dependence from 69% to 56% by pulling more from the Americas and Africa, and Japan is kicking off a second round of SPR releases from 1 May. But SPRs are finite.
Ref. to the negotiations, we should not bet on speed. The current Iranian leadership is dominated by genuine hardliners willing to absorb economic pain and run the clock to extract concessions. That is not a setup for a rapid resolution. US/Israeli media briefings keep framing the delay as ”internal Iranian divisions”, the reality is more complicated and points toward weeks and months, not days.
Our point is that the complexity is large, and higher prices have only just started (given a scenario where the negotiations drag out in time). The market spent April leaning on the USD 90/bl rest-of-year assumption; that case is diminishing by the hour. If ”early May reopening” is replaced by ”June, July or later” over the next week or two, both crude and products have meaningful room to reprice higher from here. There is a high risk being short energy and betting on any immediate political resolution(!).
Analys
Market Still Betting on Timely Resolution, But Each Day Raises Shortage Risk
Down on Friday. Up on Monday. The Brent June crude oil contract traded down 5.1% last week to a close of $90.38/b. It reached a high of $103.87/b last Monday and a low of $86.09/b on Friday as Iran announced that the Strait of Hormuz was fully open for transit. That quickly changed over the weekend as the US upheld its blockade of Iranian oil exports while Iran naturally responded by closing the SoH again. The US blew a hole in the engine room of the Iranian ship TOUSKA and took custody of the ship on Sunday. Brent crude is up 5.6% this morning to $95.4/b.

The cease-fire is expiring tomorrow. The US has said it will send a delegation for a second round of negotiations in Islamabad in Pakistan. But Iran has for now rejected a second round of talks as it views US demands as unrealistic and excessive while the US is also blocking the Strait of Hormuz.
While Brent is up 5% this morning, the financial market is still very optimistic that progress will be made. That talks will continue and that the SoH will fully open by the start of May which is consistent with a rest-of-year average Brent crude oil price of around $90/b with the market now trading that balance at around $88/b.
Financial optimism vs. physical deterioration. We have a divergence where the financial market is trading negotiations, improvements and resolution while at the same time the physical market is deteriorating day by day. Physical oil flows remain constrained by disrupted flows, longer voyage times and elevated freight and insurance costs.
Financial markets are betting that a US/Iranian resolution will save us in time from violent shortages down the road. But every day that the SoH remains closed is bringing us closer to a potentially very painful point of shortages and much higher prices.
The US blockade is also a weapon of leverage against its European and Asian allies. When Iran closed the SoH it held the world economy as a hostage against the US. The US blockade of the SoH is of course blocking Iranian oil exports. But it is also an action of disruption directed towards Europe and Asia. The US has called for the rest of the world to engaged in the war with Iran: ”If you want oil from the Persian Gulf, then go and get it”. A risk is that the US plays brinkmanship with the global oil market directed towards its European and Asian allies and maybe even towards China to force them to engage and take part. Maybe unthinkable. But unthinkable has become the norm with Trump in the White House.
-
Analys4 veckor sedanBrent crude up USD 9/bl on the week… ”deal around the corner” narrative fades
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedanSolkraften pressar elpriserna dagtid
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedanMichel Gubel ger sin syn på oljemarknaden
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedanSvag vårflod dubblar elpriserna
-
Analys2 dagar sedanOil product price pain is set to rise as the Strait of Hormuz stays closed into summer







