Följ oss

Analys

SEB – Råvarukommentarer, 4 november 2013

Publicerat

den

SEB Veckobrev med prognoser på råvaror

Rekommendationer

Vilka råvaror att köpa och sälja

*) Avkastningen anges för 1:1 certifikaten där både BULL och 1:1 certifikat är angivna.

Inledning

Vi har haft fel i att rekommendera köp efter bara en liten rekyl nedåt på elpriset för två veckor sedan. Rekylen från uppgången till 44.75 trodde vi skulle stanna på över 42, men priset fortsatte falla ner till 39. Fredagens stängningspris på 39.32 ligger faktiskt bara en hårsmån över den absoluta bottennoteringen på 38.24 euro som noterades den 21 juni. Rimligtvis måste det vara ett bra pris att köpa på. Trots att vi haft fel, måste vi återigen rekommendera köp av el på kort sikt. På en sikt av ett par år tror vi att konjunkturuppgången i världen har bidragit till att höja elpriset betydligt.

Priset på socker har fallit tillbaka till den tekniska utbrottsnivån och vi anser att detta är ett tillfälle att köpa SOCKER S eller BULL SOCKER X4 S (för den som vill ta mer risk).

Vi gör inga rekommendationsförändringar i raps förutom att vi går tillbaka till neutral rekommendation efter att i förra veckobrevet gjort en försiktig höjning till köp.

På fredag publicerar USDA sin första WASDE-rapport på två månader. Den väntas innehålla en stor uppjustering av hektarskörden för amerikansk majs. Förväntningarna om det har fått majspriset att gå ner den senaste tiden.

Råolja – Brent

Oljepriset backade med 1% i veckan, det mesta i fredags, som vi ser i diagrammet nedan. En viktig bidragande orsak bakom prisfallet på oljan var att dollarn stärktes mot europeiska valutor. Kursuppgången mot kronan är 3% sedan förra veckan. Tillsammans med andra faktorer som t ex intjänad rabatt på terminer, steg SEB:s certfikat på olja (OLJA S) med 4% i veckan.

Teknisk analys på brent-olja 4 november 2013

Nedanför ser vi kursutvecklingen på dollar mot kronor. Notera att hela kursfallet efter budgetbråket i USA är återhämtat. Orsakerna bakom dollarns styrka (och de europeiska valutornas svaghet) är att inköpschefsindex för USA kom in på 56.4 för oktober. Månaden innan låg indexet på 56.2, men analytiker hade väntat sig ett ISM på 55. Det skapades också förväntningar på att ECB ska sänka sin styrränta i veckan som kommer, då en rapport visade att EU närmast har deflation.

Valutadiagram för USDSEK

Onsdagens lagerstatistik från DOE i USA visade att råoljelagren i Cushing ökat med 2.18 miljoner fat till 35.5 miljoner. USA:s totala lager ökade med 4.09 miljoner fat till 383.9. Det är den högsta nivån sedan i juni.

Det finns flera tecken på ökat utbud av råolja. Alla känner till den ökade produktionen av olja med hjälp av horisontell borrning och hydraulisk sprängning, kallad ”fracking”. Vi har skrivit om Mexikos betydelsefulla kursändring vad gäller det nationella oljebolaget PEMEX. Nyheter om liberalisering av den Mexikanska marknaden fortsätter att komma.

Libyens produktion låg i slutet av veckan på 400,000 fat, rapporterade OPEC. Det är ca 100,000 fat mer än förra veckan och detta är ett tecken på att landet börjar få igång sin kapacitet, som före inbördeskriget var 1.5 – 2 miljoner fat.

Även Irak exporterar nu över 2 miljoner fat om dagen. Landet bör kunna fördubbla den volymen.

En majoritet av analytikerkåren tror på ett fallande oljepris i veckan som kommer, enligt en frågeundersökning gjord av Bloomberg.

Då rabatten på terminer alltjämt fortsätter att erbjuda en hög riskpremie på att äga oljeterminer via SEB:s certifikat OLJA S, är det en placering vi gillar, men den som är intresserad kanske bör avvakta med köp ifall priset faller i veckan.

Elektricitet

Elpriset lämnade tillbaka hela uppgången från botten. Vi hade inte väntat oss en så pass grundlig rekyl och beklagar att vi haft fel om djupet på rekylen. Eftersom vi anser att elpriset på en sikt av ett till två år bör vara betydligt högre därför att priset på kol är nedtryckt under en nivå där gruvbolagen långsiktigt kan täcka kostnaderna (95 dollar / ton) och priset på utsläppsrätter bör kunna återhämta sig väsentligt.

Vädret har varit onormalt blött i hela Europa, men nu på måndagsmorgonen kunde vi läsa om torrare prognoser. Det bör ge stöd för elmarknaden.

Nedan ser vi prisdiagrammet för det första kvartalet 2014:s kontrakt, uppdaterat till i fredags.

Diagram över elpriset för Q1 2014-kvartalet

Nedan ser vi priset på energikol, den närmaste månadens leveranstermin. Priset föll kraftigt med fem dollar per ton i slutet av förra veckan. Trenden är dock fortfarande uppåtgående och då måste man betrakta nedgången som en rekyl. 55-dagars glidande medelvärde pekar uppåt och marknaden har senast noterat en ny topp och en ny högre botten. 80 dollar per ton är ett tekniskt stöd, bevisat både i mars och i oktober.

Prisutveckling på energikol

Även årskontraktet på kol har stigit från 80 dollar till 83.70, som vi ser i diagrammet nedan.

Kolpriset

Priset på utsläppsrätter föll tillbaka förra veckan. Trenden, given av 55-dagars glidande medelvärde, är dock fortfarande uppåtriktad. Köpintressen vid 4.50 euro har tidigare hejdat prisnedgångar under den nivån.

Pris på utsläppsrätter

Vi rekommenderar alltså köp av EL S eller BULL EL X4 S.

Naturgas

Naturgaspriset föll kraftigt i veckan som gick, minus 5%. Det gör amerikansk naturgas till förloraren bland de råvaror som man kan placera i. BEAR NATGAS X4 S steg med 30% förra veckan och blev därmed det certifikat som ökade mest i värde förra veckan.

Vi har ingen insyn i den amerikanska marknaden för naturgas, en marknad som är strikt lokal till sin natur, men noterar att priset nu ligger nära bottennoteringen från augusti. En tidigare bottennotering brukar kunna utgöra en teknisk stödnivå, en prisnivå där en rekyl uppåt eventuellt kan ta sin utgångspunkt.

Prisutveckling på natural gas

Guld & Silver

Guldpriset (i dollar) orkade inte över motståndet vid 1350 dollar.

Våra vänner på Guldcentralen säger att det är stark efterfrågan på fysiskt investeringsguld och att leveranstiderna från grossisterna i utlandet har blivit längre – ett tecken på att det är allmänt stark efterfrågan. Samtidigt kan vi läsa att efterfrågan i Kina och Indien visar tecken på mättnad vid den här prisnivån efter att priset legat under 1400 dollar sedan i våras. När folk köper fysiskt guld gör man det med en lång eller mycket lång tidshorisont.

Tekniskt har priset som ovan nämnt vänt ner efter motståndet vid 1350 dollar. Sedan slutet av juni har den fallande trenden övergått i en konsolideringsfas. I det här läget går inte att säga om denna kommer att följas av en fortsättning på prisfallet eller om trenden kommer att vändas uppåt.

Teknisk anlays på gulpriset (gold spot)

Nedan ser vi kursdiagrammet för silver i dollar per troy ounce. Vi noterar att den fallande trendlinjen / motståndet från toppen för ett år sedan, inte har brutits ännu, även om det var nära förra veckan. Priset föll tillbaka till 22 dollar. I det här läget skulle en uppgång över 23 dollar signalera att den fallande trenden är bruten. I annat fall är den intakt.

Silverpriset tekniskt analyserat

Vi fortsätter att vara neutrala guld och silver. Silverprisets utveckling är särskilt intressant att följa nu, med tanke på att det är så nära till ett trendbrott uppåt.

Platina & Palladium

SEB:s certifikat PLATINA S steg med 3% den senaste veckan och PALLADIUM S med 2%. I dollartermer föll priset något, men eftersom dollarn stärktes, blev slutresultatet en uppgång.

Man kan se av CFTC:statistiken av non-commercials positioner att, dessa (hedgefonder) köper platina-terminer vid priser under 1500 dollar per troy uns. Smyckesefterfrågan anses avta vid priser över 1500 dollar.

Det är gruvarbetarkonflikt i luften i Sydafrika. Det finns två betydelsefulla fackföreningar: ACMU (Association of Miners and Construction Workers Union) och National Union of Mineworkers (NUM).

ACMU hotar att börja strejka vid Implats gruvor, vilket skulle kunna sprida sig till Amplats. Förhandlingar pågår med Lonmin.

NUM leder just nu kampviljan. I veckan som gick varslades om strejk vid Northam-Platinum i Limpopo. Från Johannesburg rapporterades på söndagskvällen att förhandlingar inte kommit igång. NUM:s chefsförhandlare Ecliff Tantsi sade på söndagseftermiddagen att gruvarbetarna inte kommer att gå på när nattskiftet börjar klockan 20:00 på söndagskvällen och att ingen kommer att komma till gruvan när dagskiftet börjar klockan 05:00 på måndagsmorgonen. Tantsi sade att de 7000 NUM-medlemmarna utgjorde 80% av arbetsstyrkan vid gruvan. Lönekravet är en höjning på mellan 22 och 43%, beroende på kategori. Bolaget meddelade förra månaden, i samband med samtal med ”the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration” att man planerar för en lönehöjning med 7 – 8% för år 2014

Analytiker som studerat leveranserna från Sydafrika till Schweiz hävdar att gruvbolagen har lager motsvarande en månads efterfrågan, som en buffert för eventuella strejker. Det krävs därför en långvarig konflikt för att påverka utbudet. Ju längre konflikten pågår, desto större effekt kan den alltså få på priset, i synnerhet om ACMU förverkligar sitt hot om strejk vid Implats gruvor.

Ingen av gruvorna går med vinst vid dagens lönenivå och prisnivå på platina.

Spotpriset på platina analyserat

Nedan ser vi frontmånadskontraktet på palladium. Palladium ligger fortfarande i en slags sidledes rörelse, utan trend.

Frontmånadskontraktet på palladium

Platina är vår favorit, inte minst med tanke på att strejksäsongen har börjat i Sydafrika. Vi rekommenderar köp av PLATINA S. Vi går också över till köp för palladium, som vi tycker att man kan försöka köpa vid nivåer vid 725 dollar per uns.

Koppar

Koppar har fortfarande inte brutit sig ur den triangelformation, som syns tydligt i kursdiagrammet. Kanske händer ingenting innan november månads prompt-dag, den tredje onsdagen i månaden. Med fallande lagernivåer och stigande ekonomisk aktivitet tror vi att brottet blir på uppsidan. Tekniskt motstånd finns vid 7500 dollar per ton. Vi fortsätter därför att rekommendera en köpt position i KOPPAR S.

Diagramanalys på kopparpris

Aluminium

Aluminiummarknaden tog sig upp till 1900 dollar per ton. Det är den övre delen av det intervall om 1800 – 1900 dollar, som vi tror att priset kommer att ligga inom. Mot slutet av förra veckan föll priset ner till 1843 dollar. Fundamentalt har inget hänt den senaste tiden. Vi tror att marknaden kommer att fortsätta handla inom intervallet 1800 – 1900 dollar.

Diagramanalys på aluminium

Vi har neutral rekommendation.

Zink

Zink gick upp till motstånden vid 1975 och föll därefter tillbaka mot slutet av förra veckan. Marknaden befinner sig fortfarande i konsolidering inför vad vi tror är en prisuppgång. Sedan i våras har zink handlats inom ett konsolideringsintervall på mellan 1825 – 2000 dollar per ton. Kan man komma in i ZINK S när zinkpriset är i den nedre halvan av det intervallet tror vi att man har goda chanser att göra en bra affär. Vi fortsätter att rekommendera köp av ZINK S (med det förbehållet).

Diagramanalys på zink

Nickel

Nickelmarknaden sätter sitt hopp till att Indonesien genomför sitt exportstopp av nickelmalm. Konsultfirman Wood MacKenzie estimerar att 40% av nickelindustrin går med förlust vid dagens priser. Priset passerade marginalkostnaden på uppskattningsvis 17000 dollar per ton under 2012. Det är av den här anledningen som Glencore Xstrata stängde sin Focandogruva i Dominikanska Republiken och det brasilianska bolaget Votoratim stängde sin gruva utanför Fortaleza. Samtidigt expanderar Vale sin produktion med sina nya projekt VNC, Koniambo, Abatovy, Ramu och Ravensthorpe. Alla utom Ravensthorpe är flera år försenade, men kommer nu alltså igång, vilket är oturligt med tanke på priset. De totalt sju projekt som nu successivt kommer igång tillför 275,000 ton nickel till marknaden per år med fullt genomslag 2017 – 2018. Det ska jämföras med överskottet i marknaden under 2008 – 2012 som uppgick till 319,000 ton.

Indonesien antog redan år 2009 en lag om att sluta exportera laterit nickel-malm, som försett Kinas verk med råvaran för att tillverka Nickel Pig Iron (NPI). Indonesien vill att malmen förädlas inom landet. Om Indonesien inte exporterat sin malm (och inte gjort något annat med den heller), skulle marknaden istället för ett överskott av nickel på 319,000 ton ha haft ett underskott på 221,000 ton. Priset på nickel hade då utvecklat sig helt annorlunda än det gjort. Ett dussintal kinesiska företag håller på att bygga fabriker i Indonesien för att på plats förädla malmen. Nickeljärn kommer sedan troligtvis att exporteras till Kina. Man kan därför inte bara hoppas att utbudet ska försvinna i och med Indonesiens exportförbud mot malm. Metallen kommer att komma ut ändå, givet att den inhemska produktionen kommer igång. Just nu ser det ut att det kommer att ta ett tag innan full kapacitet är på plats inom landet.

Till saken hör att Indonesien har ett stort underskott i bytesbalansen och verkligen behöver exportinkomsterna från malmen. Om den inhemska förädlingsindustrin inte finns på plats, ska man inte utesluta att exportstoppets startdatum (början på 2014) kan skjutas upp. Det kan knappast vara i landets intressen att få själva gruvorna att gå i konkurs.

Vi avråder bestämt från att köpa nickel med förhoppningen om att Indonesiens nickelkälla ska försvinna från marknaden. Det är rent önsketänkande. Samtidigt har vi en gruvindustri som går med förlust pga det låga priset. Man kan kanske tro att det är en situation som nickelmarknaden inte kan tolerera. En stor del av 1980-talet rådde emellertid just den situationen. Producenter drog sig för att stänga nya och moderna gruvor, trots att de gjorde förlust, med vissheten att nickel är en lyxprodukt, som allt rikare befolkningar gärna konsumerar mer av. Förr eller senare kommer efterfrågan ikapp. Dagens situation är snarlik, men miljökraven vid stängning av nickelgruvor är ännu mer kostsam. Någon återgång till 50,000 dollar per ton tror vi är helt uteslutet och vi tror att risken för besvikelser pga grund av Indonesiens aviserade exportstopp av malm är uppenbar.

Med det sagt, tror vi ändå, att nickelpriset har en botten etablerad vid 13,500 dollar per ton. En övre gräns är just nu 15,000 dollar per ton. Det krävs ytterligare drag i den globala ekonomin för att få priset att gå över den nivån. Det tror vi kommer att ske, men kanske inte just nu, när risken för besvikelse pga att Indonesiens regering kompromissar om exportstoppet till dess den inhemska produktionen är på plats, får priset att rekylera ner igen. Men den som köper nickel (NICKEL S) vid ett pris vid eller under 14,000 dollar per ton, gör sannolikt en god affär på sikt.

Nickelpriset analyserat

Med varning för att priset just nu är högt, är vår grundsyn att man bör försöka köpa nickel och rekommenderar köp av NICKEL S mot ovanstående bakgrund.

Kaffe

Kaffepriset föll 10% från drygt 115 cent till 105 cent sedan det förra veckobrevet. I Vietnam skördar kaffebönderna sin robusta just nu. Skörden väntas uppgå till rekordhöga 28 miljoner säckar (60 Kg), 10% mer än förra året.

USA:s jordbruksattaché i Bogota höjde skördeestimatet i landet med 1.5 miljoner säckar till 10.5 miljoner för 2013-14. Landets kaffeproduktion återhämtar sig alltså i snabbare takt än räknat med efter bladmögelangreppen.

Det finns alltså mycket gott om kaffe i världen, även om lagren av robusta är låga.

Priset är dock så lågt att det inte täcker kostnaderna. Vad som måste till, är att priset påverkar produktionen. Tvyärr har nu även Vietnam bestämt sig för att låta staten köpa upp kaffe till interventionslager. Detta kaffe utbud är dock bara lagrat och kommer ut på marknaden förr eller senare. Det är en kortsiktig lösning på ett långsiktigt problem – att det produceras för mycket kaffe i världen för att det ska vara en långsiktigt lönsam verksamhet. Kaffepriset är för lågt i ett långsiktigt perspektiv, men vändpunkten skjuts fram på grund av att marknadskrafterna sätts ur spel av stödprogram. I och för sig innebär detta att priset på världsmarknaden har potential att fall ännu längre ner från det långsiktiga jämviktspriset (där producenter långsiktigt får en rimlig vinst på produktionen.)

Oklar situation för kaffepriset

Vi behåller tills vidare neutral rekommendation, tills vi ser tecken på ett trendbrott.

[box]SEB Veckobrev Veckans råvarukommentar är producerat av SEB Merchant Banking och publiceras i samarbete och med tillstånd på Råvarumarknaden.se[/box]

Disclaimer

The information in this document has been compiled by SEB Merchant Banking, a division within Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) (“SEB”).

Opinions contained in this report represent the bank’s present opinion only and are subject to change without notice. All information contained in this report has been compiled in good faith from sources believed to be reliable. However, no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made with respect to the completeness or accuracy of its contents and the information is not to be relied upon as authoritative. Anyone considering taking actions based upon the content of this document is urged to base his or her investment decisions upon such investigations as he or she deems necessary. This document is being provided as information only, and no specific actions are being solicited as a result of it; to the extent permitted by law, no liability whatsoever is accepted for any direct or consequential loss arising from use of this document or its contents.

About SEB

SEB is a public company incorporated in Stockholm, Sweden, with limited liability. It is a participant at major Nordic and other European Regulated Markets and Multilateral Trading Facilities (as well as some non-European equivalent markets) for trading in financial instruments, such as markets operated by NASDAQ OMX, NYSE Euronext, London Stock Exchange, Deutsche Börse, Swiss Exchanges, Turquoise and Chi-X. SEB is authorized and regulated by Finansinspektionen in Sweden; it is authorized and subject to limited regulation by the Financial Services Authority for the conduct of designated investment business in the UK, and is subject to the provisions of relevant regulators in all other jurisdictions where SEB conducts operations. SEB Merchant Banking. All rights reserved.

Fortsätt läsa
Annons
3 Kommentarer

3 Comments

  1. BLDGR

    4 november, 2013 vid 12:22

    ”Trots att vi haft fel, måste vi återigen rekommendera köp av el på kort sikt.”
    Vad räknar ni som kort sikt? Till februari-mars?

    • Torbjörn

      4 november, 2013 vid 20:04

      Jag menade en till två veckor. Vi har en långsiktigt positiv syn på el (1 till 2 år) också. I fredags stängde priset på terminen för det första kvartalet bara en hårsmån över sommarens bottennotering och det kändes som en överreaktion på nedsidan, som borde föranleda en snabb prisuppgång ”på kort sikt”, på någon vecka, eller två, högst.

  2. BLDGR

    12 november, 2013 vid 13:10

    Tack Torbjörn!

Skriv ett svar

Din e-postadress kommer inte publiceras. Obligatoriska fält är märkta *

Analys

US inventories will likely rise less than normal in mths ahead and that is bullish

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

US commercial crude and product stocks will now most likely start to rise on a weekly basis and not really start to decline again before in week 38. We do however expect US inventories to rise less than normal in reflection of a global oil market in a slight deficit. This will likely hand support to the Brent crude oil price going forward.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities at SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Shedding some value along with bearish metals and China/HK equity losses. Brent crude has trailed lower since it jumped to an intraday high of USD 87.7/b on 19. March spurred by Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian refineries. Ydy if fell back 0.6% and today it is pulling back another 1% to USD 85.4/b. But the decline today is accompanied by declines in industrial metals together with a 1.3% decline in Chinese and Hong Kong equities. Thus more broad based forces are helping to pull the oil price lower.

US API indicated a 5.4 m b rise in US oil stocks last week. But rising stocks are normal now onwards. The US API ydy indicated that US crude stocks rose 9.3 m b last week while gasoline stocks declined 4.4 m b while distillates rose 0.5 m b. I.e. a total rise in crude and products of 5.4 m b (actual EIA data today at 15:30 CET). That may have helped to push Brent crude lower this morning. It is however very important to be aware that US inventories seasonally tend to rise from week 12 to week 38. And from week 12 to 24 the average weekly rise is 4.1 m b per week. The increase indicated by the US API ydy is thus not at all way out of line with what is normally taking place in the months to come. What really matters is how US commercial inventories do versus what is normal at the time of year.

US commercial stocks have fallen 17 m b more than normal since end of 2023. So far this year we have seen a draw of  39 m b vs the last week of 2023. The normal draw over this period is only -22 m b. I.e. US commercial inventories have drawn down 17 m b more than normal over this period. This has been the gradual, bullish nudge on oil prices. US commercial stocks should normally rise 63.5 m b from week 12 to week 38. What matters to oil prices is thus whether US inventories rise more or less than that over this period.

Drone attacks on Russian refineries was a catalyst to release Brent to higher levels. Brent crude broke out to the upside on 13 March along with the Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian refineries. Some 800 k b/d of refining capacity was hurt and probably went off line. But in the global scheme of things this is a mere 1% or so of total global refining capacity. And if we assume that it is off line for say 3 months, then it equates to maybe 0.25% impact on global refining activity in 2024 which is easy to adapt to. Refining margins have not moved  much at all. ARA spot diesel cracks are now USD 2.25/b lower than it was in 12 March 2024. Thus no crisis for refined products at all.

We’ll probably not return to pre-drone attack price level of USD 82/b any time soon. Though a dip to that price level is of course not at all out of the question. The oil market may send the oil price lower in the short term since very little material impact in the global scope of things seems to follow from the drone attacks on Russian refineries. Our view is however that the attacks were more like a catalyst to release the oil price to the upside following a steady and stronger than normal decline in US commercial inventories. I.e. the latest price gains in our view is not so much about an added risk premium in the oil price but more about oil price finally adjusting higher according to the fundamentals which have played out since the start of the year with stronger than normal declines in US commercial inventories. We thus see no immediate return to pre-drone-attack price level of USD 82/b. Rather we expect to see continued support to the upside through steady, gradual inventory erosion versus normal like we have seen so far this year.

Voluntary cuts by Russia in Q2-24 could be bullish if delivered as promised. Earlier in March we saw Russia’n willingness to cut back supply in Q2-24 in a mix of production restraints and export restraints. Saudi Arabia and Russia are equal partners in OPEC+ with equal magnitudes of production. In a reflection of this they set equal baselines in May 2020 of 11.0 m b/d. Saudi Arabia produced 9.0 m b/d in February while Russia produced 9.4 m b/d. This is probably why Russia in early March stated that they were willing to cut back in Q2-24. To align more with what Saudi Arabia is producing. It has been of huge importance that Saudi Arabia last year cut its production down to 9.0 m b/d and thus below Russian production. This reactivated Russia as a dynamic, proactive participant in OPEC+. The actual effect of proclaimed production/export cuts by Russia in Q2-24 remains to be seen, but calls for USD 100/b as a consequence of such cuts have surfaced.

So far we haven’t lost a single drop of oil due to Houthie attacks in the Red Sea. We have lost some up-time in Russia refining due to Ukrainian drone strikes lately. But nothing more than can be compensated elsewhere in the world. Temporarily reduced volumes of refined hydrocarbons from Russian will instead lead to higher exports of unrefined molecules (crude oil).

For now OPEC+ is comfortably controlling the oil market and the market will likely be running a slight deficit as a result with inventories getting a continued gradual widening, negative difference versus normal levels thus nudging the oil price yet higher. SEB’s forecast for Brent crude average 2024 is USD 85/b. This means that we’ll likely see both USD 90/b and maybe also USD 100/b some times during the year. But do make sure to evaluate changes in US oil inventories versus what is normal at the time of year. Rising inventories are bullish if they rise less than what is normal from now to week 38.

US commercial crude and product stocks will likely rise going forward. But since the global oil market is likely going to be in slight deficit we’ll likely see slower than normal rise in US inventories with an increasing negative difference to normal inventory levels.

US commercial crude and product stocks
Source: SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data feed, EIA data

Total US crude and product stocks incl. SPR are now 4 m b below the low-point from December 2022

Total US crude and product stocks incl. SPR
Source: SEB graph and calculations, Blbrg data feed, EIA data
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

From surge to slump for natural gas: Navigating the new normal in Europe

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Over the past 4-5 months, EU natural gas prices, indicated by the TTF benchmark, have plummeted by 50% from an October high of EUR 56/MWh to the current EUR 28/MWh for the front-month contract, defying expectations of seasonal price increases. This downturn can be attributed to robust EU inventories at 59% capacity and persistently subdued natural gas demand, down by 11% compared to historical norms. Mild weather in Northwest Europe and a prolonged industrial recession have suppressed consumption, resulting in a significant gas surplus despite nearing the end of the winter heating season (90% complete). These factors collectively exert downward pressure on prices.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

The correlation between Brent and TTF prices remains from times partly “fluid”. In our December 2023 natural gas price update, we predicted a constrained global natural gas market, anticipating a swift resurgence in demand following a decline in gas prices. Our projections were underpinned by a robust Brent Crude price outlook, set at USD 85/bl, USD 87.5/bl, and USD 90/bl for 2024, 2025, and 2026 respectively, with a Crude-to-gas rate of 80%. However, this scenario has yet to materialize as the anticipated demand recovery has been notably delayed, requiring even lower prices than initially predicted for its realization—a phenomenon unique in recent memory.

Achieving a global natural gas price convergence towards levels more aligned with Brent Crude appears plausible, signaling a return to a measure of normalcy. The absence of a winter premium during the 2023/24 winter season suggests a healthier outlook for Q2-24, mitigating the risk of substantial short-term price spikes in European gas markets. The sporadic spikes witnessed in 2022 and partially in 2023 are now a thing of the past, indicating a change from the volatility experienced in recent years.

Short-term EU gas prices hinge heavily on immediate weather patterns and industrial gas demand, both exerting considerable influence on inventory levels, which serve as a critical gauge of supply and demand dynamics. Looking further ahead, the trajectory of prices is linked with the global LNG balance, particularly contingent upon factors such as projected US natural gas production and the capacity of US LNG exports to the global market.

Moreover, the declining influence of Russia on the European gas market is notable, with sporadic gas export halts from the former energy powerhouse carrying reduced impact. Global market recalibrations indicate a sustained elevation in price levels, with EUR 30/MWh emerging as a feasible benchmark for the foreseeable future. We also call “the end of the energy crisis”, as the worst is history. Reflecting on the current year, EU TTF prices hit the lowest point in late February, with expectations of a potential slide/climb from current prices at EUR 28/MWh.

In essence, our current natural gas price forecast hinges on a delicate equilibrium among three pivotal factors. Firstly, the TTF price must strike a balance, remaining sufficiently low to stimulate a resurgence in demand. For context, the historical average real price hovers around EUR 27/MWh, with EUR 30/MWh anticipated to gradually encourage demand recovery, thereby mitigating the effects of demand destruction. Secondly, the TTF price should maintain a relatively ”normal” relationship with Crude prices, as historical trends indicate a natural correlation between the two. A notably low rate would invariably attract heightened interest from Asian markets, as LNG emerges as a cost-effective alternative to oil in terms of energy content. Lastly, the TTF price must also exhibit a level of elevation to cover the expenses associated with producing and transporting US natural gas to the European market. This entails factoring in costs related to Henry Hub, tolling fees, liquefaction, transportation, and regasification, among other associated expenses. Achieving a delicate equilibrium among these factors is vital for ensuring the stability and sustainability of natural gas pricing dynamics in the European market.

Consequently, our current stance reflects a delicate balancing act among these three critical factors. Settling on EUR 30/MWh, we predict that prices lower than this threshold would catalyze a swifter demand resurgence, while simultaneously enhancing the appeal of natural gas against oil as the spread widens. Moreover, importation from the USA would encounter mounting challenges as prices decline, particularly approaching the EUR 25/MWh mark when landed in ARA.

The TTF market has been complexly interlinked with the global LNG market at the margins since 2015, many years before the energy crisis. While the proportion of LNG consumed in Europe has surged significantly, the concept of LNG prices influencing TTF prices at the margin is not new. However, in terms of volume, the current situation declares us notably more vulnerable than in previous years.

In our updated projections, we have revised our price forecasts downward, particularly notable at the front end, encompassing Q2-24, Q3-24, and the Full-year (FY) 2024. Other adjustments, though marginally smaller, remain for FY 2025, 2026, and 2027. Despite these reductions, we anticipate a trajectory of increasing European natural gas prices from their current levels. Notably, Q1-24 is now expected to average EUR 27/MWh, followed by predictions of EUR 25/MWh, EUR 28/MWh, and EUR 32/MWh for Q2-24, Q3-24, and Q4-24 respectively. Consequently, the average for FY 2024 is forecasted at EUR 28/MWh, marking a notable decline from the previous estimate of EUR 40/MWh.

In our outlook for longer-term pricing, we anticipate an average of EUR 30/MWh for the years 2025, 2026, and 2027—a reduction of EUR 10/MWh compared to our previous update in December 2023, which projected EUR 40/MWh. This long-term forecast only sits marginally higher, by EUR 3-4/MWh, than the historical average real price of approximately EUR 27/MWh. Such pricing aligns intending to stimulate further demand recovery and maintain consumer affordability within the European economy. Reflecting on historical trends, previous price levels in the European market might be seen as reliant on potentially risky agreements with Russia. Consequently, the era of exceptionally low-cost energy is drawing to a close, indicating a new paradigm where European gas and power are priced slightly higher, establishing a ”new normal” for the foreseeable future.

TTF spot prices

PRICE ACTION

The absence of a winter premium for global natural gas is notable. Our longer-term natural gas price projection, set at EUR 30/MWh, demonstrates resilience compared to historical market norms. Last quarter (Q4-23) closed at EUR 43/MWh for the front-month contract, a figure approximately EUR 10/MWh lower than our recent expectations. Noteworthy market adjustments have transpired not only within the European gas market but also on a global scale. This ongoing adaptation is expected to continue influencing the gas market into 2024, resulting in fewer severe price spikes and a return to more normal price differentials.

Global natural gas prices, EUR/MWh

Maintaining our gas price forecast at EUR 30/MWh for 2025 suggests an expectation for European natural gas prices to stabilize at current market rates. This projection extends to 2026 and 2027, which stand roughly 30% higher than historical norms – a contrast to the previous era of favorable deals with Russia flooding European consumers with low-cost piped natural gas.

Considerable attention is drawn to the relationship between gas and oil prices. With our oil market outlook projecting USD 85/bl, USD 87.5/bl, and USD 90/bl for 2024, 2025, and 2026 respectively, the convergence of gas prices to more normal circumstances implies a corresponding alignment with oil prices. Historically, EU natural gas prices have traded at 0.55-0.6 times Brent crude prices, a figure that is expected to converge closer to historical norms. However, our forecasts for 2024, 2025, and 2026 slightly exceed historical norms, at 0.62 x Brent, 0.65 x Brent, and 0.62 x Brent respectively, reflecting a tighter natural gas balance in the coming years.

The transformation of global LNG trade, from roughly 5% spot and short-term LNG trade in 2000 to roughly 30% in 2023, underscores a higher degree of flexibility in negotiating spot and short-term LNG contracts. This evolution suggests a shift towards contracts potentially decoupled from Brent indexations, challenging the conventional reliance on oil prices as a benchmarking tool for global natural gas prices.


US LNG

A significant surge in global liquefaction (export) capacity is anticipated from the US and Qatar starting in 2026 and beyond. These large-scale liquefaction projects typically entail long-term contracts with predefined off-takers or demand centers, primarily serving power plants or industrial applications. The transportation of substantial LNG volumes from the US to Europe underscores strategic economic and energy considerations. The US, propelled by abundant shale gas resources and extensive LNG liquefaction infrastructure, has emerged as a major LNG exporter. Europe, seeking to diversify energy sources and reduce dependence on Russia, offers an attractive market for American LNG. Additionally, LNG’s flexibility as a cleaner-burning fuel aligns with Europe’s environmental sustainability objectives and transition away from coal.

The transatlantic LNG trade between the US and Europe capitalizes on arbitrage opportunities driven by regional gas price variations and demand-supply imbalances. This flow not only enhances energy security for European nations but also aids NE Asia in meeting environmental obligations.

The US-Europe netback for LNG cargo depends on various economic factors, including global natural gas prices, US regional supply and demand dynamics, and fluctuations in shipping costs.

The competitiveness of US LNG in the European market is influenced by several factors, including the US benchmark price for domestic natural gas (Henry Hub), source gas costs, voyage costs, shipping costs, and regasification costs at the destination.

In more detail the competitiveness of US LNG in the European market is influenced by factors such as the US benchmark price for domestic natural gas (Henry Hub); Source gas cost (Henry Hub + Tolling fee and liquefaction fee); voyage cost (Insurance, port, canal, boil-off, and fuel cost); shipping cost at day rate; and regasification cost in the other end.

A simplified calculation demonstrates the US-EU arbitrage opportunity. At current market figures, the total cost of delivering LNG from the US to Europe is roughly USD 7.05/MMBtu or approximately EUR 22/MWh. Comparatively, the EU TTF front-month contract trades at EUR 28/MWh, indicating an average EUR 6/MWh arbitrage opportunity and an equal profit margin for traders. However, with state-of-the-art LNG vessels, the total cost could decrease significantly, resulting in a substantial profit margin for traders.

The calculation (with current market figures all in USD per MMBtu as a standard unit):
Front-month Henry Hub (1.65) + 15% tolling fee (0.25) and liquefaction fee for conventional LNG ships (2.5) + Insurance, port, and canal (on average 0.33) + boil-off and fuel cost (on average 1.2) + regasification (0.5) + shipping cost at current day rate (0.62).

i.e., for total cost from the US to Europe we get 1.65 + 0.25 + 2.5 + 0.33 + 1.2 + 0.5 + 0.62 = USD 7.05/MMBtu – or roughly EUR 22/MWh. At the time of writing, the EU TTF front-month contract is trading at EUR 28/MWh. Hence, in the current spot market, the US-EU arbitrage is at roughly on average EUR 6/MWh and equally EUR 6/MWh profit to trader. However, this is a conservative estimate. In a situation with a state-of-the-art MEGI / X-DF LNG vessel, we would have a lower liquefaction fee and per unit insurance, boil-off, and fuel cost, which would imply a total cost of USD 6.0/MMBtu (EUR 18.5/MWh) – consequently, a massive EUR 9.5/MWh profit to the trader. Understating the massive economic argument in shipping LNG from the US to the EU (at current market rates).

But even though a substantial arrival of LNG export capacity in the US is approaching, it is not like the US has unlimited natural gas production, or unlimited LNG capacity to feed the global thirst for LNG. Hence, it is not like the EU TTF will plunge to levels comparable to the US Henry Hub + all associated costs for delivering to the EU.

A substantial surge in LNG export capacity is imminent, fueled by significant investments totaling USD 235 billion directed towards upcoming super-chilled fuel projects since 2019. The majority of these projects are slated to come online from the second half of 2025 onward, with an additional USD 55 billion investment expected by 2025, driving a remarkable 45% surge in LNG liquefaction capacity by the end of the decade.

Currently, the global LNG export market boasts a total capacity of approximately 420 million tonnes, projected to expand significantly to 610 million tonnes by 2030. The bulk of this expansion will stem from Qatar, Russia, and the US, with capacities increasing by roughly 23, 26, and 117 million tonnes respectively from 2024 to 2030.

However, it’s worth noting that on January 26, 2024, the Biden Administration paused LNG exports to non-FTA countries, awaiting updated analyses by the DOE. This affects 4 major projects and risks WTO challenges. The DOE cites outdated assessments, signaling a policy shift and raising market uncertainties.

This pause could have significant geopolitical and trade implications, as it also becomes an election issue. Stakeholders, including exporters and developers, now face uncertainties and must review agreements. Overall, the pause prompts a broader review of LNG export policies, impacting domestic and international markets. However, it’s too early to fully assess its impact, so the aforementioned capacity forecast remains firm for now.

The industry’s confidence is underpinned by the anticipation of rising LNG demand, driven by Europe’s efforts to reduce reliance on Russian gas and Asia’s shift away from coal, particularly in China. Yet, this expansion is not merely speculative; it represents a long-term commitment between suppliers and off-takers. These projects typically entail long-term contracts of 20+ years, often supplying power plants or industrial applications. Consequently, the new LNG export capacity is expected to match a similar scale of demand.

The significant export ventures from the United States to Qatar will further cement LNG’s role in the global energy landscape, with contracts extending well into the 2050s, even surpassing some carbon-neutral targets.

Moreover, there remains ample room for natural gas in the long run. The COP28 acknowledged that transitional fuels like LNG can facilitate the energy transition, signaling implicit support for LNG over dirtier fossil fuels.

Critics argue that natural gas isn’t the most environmentally friendly fossil fuel due to potential methane leakage along the supply chain. However, such concerns arise belatedly as the wave of new facilities is already underway. With oil demand reaching its peak and coal declining gradually, gas is expected to maintain its prominence in the energy mix.


SUPPLY & DEMAND

In the short term, the winter wildcard/premium is gone, pointing to a healthier Q2 2024. We have, a while back, pinpointed that the European natural gas market is in a limbo state between supply uncertainties and demand uncertainties. With a consequence of a winter wildcard largely being balanced by the short/medium-term weather and withdrawal rate of European natural gas inventories.

Recent weather forecasts predict slightly colder temperatures in early April across Northwest Europe, but the preceding winter months saw normal to milder conditions, resulting in lower-than-expected inventory drawdowns and weak price trends.

Looking ahead, forecasts for April to June 2024 suggest above-normal temperatures in Northwest Europe, reducing heating and power demand and maintaining subdued gas consumption. Prices in Q2-24 are forecasted to average around EUR 25/MWh.

Daily LNG imports - Europe

Furthermore, it is easy to think of the faded energy crisis as a European crisis. But the adaptation for global gas markets has been equally/more important. Very high global gas prices have resulted in adaption in all corners of the globe, consequently, easing the global natural gas balance and freeing more gas volumes to the highest bidder at more “reasonable” prices. During the peak of the crisis, the highest bidder was naturally Europe which was sucking up all excess global LNG volumes. However, at the current price levels, the “three importing giants”, namely China, South Korea, and Japan have finally woken up, and are no longer “re-routing” their LNG cargos, while also actively participating in the short-term/spot market.

Russia’s grip over the EU is expected to weaken in the spring/summer of 2024. Since February/March 2022, President Putin sought to balance revenue generation and geopolitical pressure by controlling the energy supply to the EU. This strategy faced challenges: reducing exports to zero would jeopardize revenue, while high exports would alleviate the EU’s energy crisis, as seen in winter 2022/23. Despite efforts, Putin’s goal of using natural gas as a strategic tool faltered in winter 2023/24.

Russia - Europe pipeline flow of natural gas

Market adaptation ensued. Since December 2022, Russian piped gas supply to Europe has fluctuated between 10-25% of historical averages, currently nearing 20%. To intensify geopolitical pressure, Russia may need to further reduce flows, possibly to around 10% in winter 2024/25. Despite the distant outlook, the market has already factored in potential price increases for next winter.

Two main pipelines deliver Russian gas to Europe: ”Turkstream,” to Turkey, and the ”Brotherhood,” through Ukraine to Slovakia. These pipelines each contribute roughly 50% of the 0.75 TWh per day flow. The pipeline via Ukraine faces physical risks, and a supply halt is likely next winter as the transit agreement between Gazprom and Naftogaz expires in December 2024, with little chance of renewal.


EU INVENTORIES

The trajectory of EU natural gas inventories for the upcoming summer is primarily influenced by both the global LNG market and European natural gas demand. In Q2-23 (one year ago), inventories commenced the injection season at an all-time high, leading to the current record-high inventory status. These comfortable inventories suggest the EU has the situation under control as it emerges from the winter season. Currently, inventories stand at 59%, a substantial 25% above the 2015-2022 average.

European natural gas inventories

Despite missing out on over 1,000 TWh of natural gas imports from Russia compared to historical levels, the mild winter of 2022/23, reduced demand due to high prices, and increased LNG imports compensated with an additional 1,400 TWh. This over-compensation of 400 TWh in Q1-23 facilitated an unprecedented injection rate into European inventories during Q1 and Q2 2023. As a result, European inventories shifted from a deficit of 180 TWh in January 2022 to a surplus of 259 TWh in April 2023, leading to the current record-high levels.

However, if NE Asia, predominantly led by China, continues to outbid the EU for LNG cargo and industrial gas demand increases due to favorable long-term hedging levels, current comfortable inventory levels will gradually return to normal. This suggests EU TTF prices will slowly climb towards over EUR 30/MWh by the next heating season, a trend partly factored into current pricing.

While the crisis urgency has faded, market adjustments now activate at lower price thresholds. Nonetheless, we anticipate slightly higher long-term price levels (EUR 30/MWh) due to increasing LNG bids from China (+NE Asia), a rebound in EU demand, and reduced LNG imports influenced by lower prices. This will result in a slower inventory build during Q2-24 and Q3-24 compared to last year. Despite diminishing supply from Russia, the EU remains focused on maintaining preparedness for future winters, leading to a new normal in natural gas inventory levels throughout the year.

The European energy crisis has significantly eased during 2023 and Q1-24. Softened front-end prices influence longer-dated prices, with the winter premium/seasonality fully washed out during the ongoing heating season. Healthy EU natural gas inventories, currently at 59% capacity (675 TWh) and surpassing the European Commission’s target of reaching 90% storage fullness by 1 November, contribute to this subsiding crisis. Continued subdued European consumption (11% below historical averages) and robust LNG imports set a ceiling on short-term prices, although increased EU demand could quickly alter this scenario, as EU demand has proven stickier than anticipated.

DEMAND RECOVERY

Reduced uncertainty and lower prices are expected to lead to more long-term hedging. Since the start of Q1 2024 (year-to-date), the TTF spot has averaged EUR 27/MWh, approximately USD 50/boe, only marginally below the ’historical norm’ when adjusted for inflation. Despite these price levels, a resurgence in European industrial gas consumption during the winter is not straightforward.

EU natura gas demand recuction vs normal

Industrial gas demand remains subdued, sitting 11% below historical averages. While this marks an improvement from the 25-30% drop experienced in mid-summer 2022 – a period characterized as the ”peak of the crisis” – when spot prices consistently traded at EUR 150/MWh (USD 255/boe).

The slower-than-expected recovery is largely attributed to industries hesitating to commit to longer-term prices. For example, during Q4 2023, despite tumbling spot prices, futures prices remained strong. In mid-October, gas for delivery in January 2024 was priced at EUR 55/MWh (USD 103/boe). Thus, during Q4 2023, peak-winter prices maintained a considerable premium over spot prices to a large extent.

However, the current landscape has changed. The winter premium has diminished as we exit the heating season, and weak spot prices predominantly drive forward. This reflects a market that is more certain and willing to forecast futures during a less turbulent phase. The convergence and narrowing gap between spot and long-term prices signify that ”peak natural gas has passed.” Major consumers in Europe are expected to adopt more long-term hedging for longer-term prices, ideally hedging these futures close to current spot prices. This suggests that current market prices will likely trigger increased consumption compared to Q3 and Q4 2023, although a full-scale comeback will take time.

As previously noted, substantial demand destruction occurred not only in Europe but also globally, particularly in Asia. Over the last couple of years, demand destruction amounted to approximately 800 TWh per year, while the normal growth rate in the global LNG market is 200 TWh per annum. This indicates that most of the demand will eventually return, although the timing remains uncertain. 


NE ASIAN LNG

EUR 25/MWh presents a favorable ”buy opportunity,” and prices are expected to either slide or climb from this point. The decline in prices can be attributed to sustained low demand and high inventories. We anticipate prices to either slide or increase from here, with minimal downside, as prices are likely to find support around EUR 25/MWh.

Forward prices for both JKM and TTF indicate that the NE Asian LNG market will remain a preferred destination for marginal LNG cargo in the near term. While the EU previously heavily relied on NE Asia, the European market can no longer solely depend on the economic vulnerabilities of NE Asia or China.

LNG arbitrage

A long-awaited pent-up demand for energy in China would lead to increased demand for goods and services, consequently boosting energy consumption, particularly natural gas, primarily in the form of LNG. In such a scenario, the JKM may command a larger premium over the TTF than the existing EUR 2.5/MWh (3-month rolling contract). This would divert LNG spot cargoes away from Europe, further reducing the EU’s natural gas surplus. Thus, the ongoing recovery in China’s economy is likely to stimulate Asia’s demand for natural gas, potentially resulting in EU LNG purchasers paying a premium to secure essential LNG imports in the future.

Daily LNG imports NE Asia

With current prices, we anticipate an increase in EU demand coupled with a decrease in EU LNG imports. This trend may persist until we observe a slight shortfall in compensation relative to the natural gas deficit from Russia, which could drive prices upward during the summer.


KEY TAKEAWAYS

The ongoing transition from coal to natural gas signifies a significant shift in the global energy landscape. Natural gas emerges as a crucial bridging technology, offering a cleaner alternative to coal and facilitating the transition toward widespread adoption of renewable energy sources. This transition underscores the environmental benefits of natural gas, positioning it as a pivotal component in mitigating climate change and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Despite challenges such as the reduction in Russian gas supply, the natural gas market is adapting rapidly. Europe, in particular, faces competition for global LNG volumes, primarily sourced from the US and Qatar. The market’s ability to swiftly adjust reflects its adaptability and resilience on a global scale, highlighting the importance of diversifying energy sources and supply routes.

Our current natural gas price forecast relies on achieving a delicate equilibrium among key factors. This includes stimulating demand, maintaining a correlation with crude prices, and ensuring cost coverage for US natural gas transportation. Striking this balance is essential for maintaining stability and sustainability in European gas pricing dynamics, ensuring energy security.

In response to changing market conditions, we have revised our price outlook downward for the short term, notably for Q2-24, Q3-24, and FY 2024. Specifically, Q1-24 is forecasted to average EUR 27/MWh, followed by predictions of EUR 25/MWh for Q2-24, EUR 28/MWh for Q3-24, and EUR 32/MWh for Q4-24. However, prices are expected to gradually increase over the longer term, with an average forecast of EUR 30/MWh for the years 2025, 2026, and 2027, slightly higher than historical averages.

This revised outlook reflects the evolving nature of the natural gas market and the need for flexibility in response to changing geopolitical landscapes and supply dynamics. Looking ahead, natural gas remains a crucial bridge over coal, facilitating the transition towards cleaner energy sources.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Fed cuts ahead bolstering oil prices

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Initially, Brent Crude experienced a decline yesterday following the release of US crude inventories data. However, nationwide US crude inventories, excluding those held in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), saw a decline for the second consecutive week, remaining below the five-year seasonal average. Additionally, there was a larger-than-expected decline in gasoline holdings. While the overall draw presents a bullish narrative, it required some support from yesterday’s Federal Reserve announcement to trend in a positive direction.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

The Brent Crude front-month contract strengthened before yesterday’s close and has continued this positive momentum into today, currently trading at USD 86.5 per barrel. This reflects an increase of roughly USD 1 per barrel (1%) compared to yesterday evening’s low point.

The Federal Reserve signaled its intention to adhere to its outlook for three rate cuts this year, boosting both risk appetite and weakening the US dollar, which has benefited global crude prices.

In our analysis, global crude prices are currently supported by strong fundamentals. Demand growth remains robust, complemented by significant production cuts by OPEC+ and subdued output from US shale oil producers. Consequently, the global oil market is operating at a slight deficit, resulting in a gradual depletion of oil inventories, as evidenced by the recent declines in US crude and product inventories (further details below). This trend is expected to provide support for oil prices and potentially drive them sideways to upwards, with limited downside risks.

However, it’s important to note that while fundamentals appear promising and the oil market has found some reassurance in yesterday’s Federal Reserve announcement, expectations for enduring inflation may act as a headwind for oil prices over the longer term, potentially capping a significant oil price rally.

As a reminder, our assumptions for Brent oil prices have remained firm since September 2023. We anticipate Brent Crude to average USD 85/bl and USD 87.5/bl for 2024 and 2025, respectively, with projections of USD 90/bl for 2026 and 2027.


Yet another week of drawdown in US inventories. Commercial crude oil inventories in the U.S., excluding those held in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, decreased by 2.0 million barrels from the previous week, reaching a total of 445.0 million barrels. This figure is approximately 3% below the five-year average for this time of year.

Total motor gasoline inventories saw a significant decline of 3.3 million barrels from the previous week, now standing approximately 2% below the five-year average. However, distillate fuel inventories experienced a marginal increase of 0.6 million barrels, remaining roughly 5% below the five-year average. Meanwhile, propane/propylene inventories rose by 0.4 million barrels, reaching a notable 9% above the five-year average.

Overall commercial petroleum inventories witnessed a decrease of 6.1 million barrels last week. Total products supplied over the last four-week period averaged 20.1 million barrels per day, indicating a 2.2% increase from the same period last year.

Motor gasoline product supplied averaged 8.8 million barrels per day over the past four weeks, showing a marginal increase of 0.3% from the same period last year. Conversely, distillate fuel product supplied averaged 3.7 million barrels per day, down by 1.9% from the same period last year. Jet fuel product supplied experienced a slight decrease of 0.2% compared to the same four-week period last year.

Fortsätt läsa

Populära