Analys
SEB – Råvarukommentarer, 16 september 2013

Rekommendationer
*) Avkastningen anges för 1:1 certifikaten där både BULL och 1:1 certifikat är angivna.
Inledning
Elmarknaden går kanske ner i veckan eftersom det ostadiga vädret har anlänt. Eftersom trenden är så tydligt positiv på marknaderna för kol och utsläppsrätter bör man ta ett sådant tillfälle i akt och köpa certifikat på el. Det kan bli en mycket bra affär.
De höga priserna på olja har fått oljeproducenter att sälja sin produkt på termin. Detta gör att avkastningen för dem som investerar i oljemarknaden via terminer erbjuds bra avkastning. Den rekyl nedåt som USA:s inställda angrepp på Syrien föranlett, är ett bra tillfälle att placera i oljemarknaden via certifikatet OLJA S.
USA:s jordbruksdepartement USDA publicerade sin månadsvisa uppdatering av utbud och efterfrågan på världsmarknaden. Den var negativ för priset på vete och majs, men neutral på soja. Sojapriset steg och det tror vi beror på att vissa aktörer lider av en psykologisk anspänning, snarare än något med grund i fakta. Vi upprepar vår säljrekommendation på soja och raps.
Två rapporter kom, i polemik med Czarnikows prognos om ett mindre överskott än väntat i sockermarknaden. Men kontentan var ändå att överskottet blir mindre än tidigare prognostiserats.
Råolja – Brent
Oljepriset föll tillbaka när det gick upp för alla – även de som inte läst det här veckobrevet – att USA inte skulle eskalera konflikten med Syrien. Som vi skrev för redan två veckor sedan var det uppenbart att USA:s president inte skulle fullfölja sitt hot. Syrienkonflikten skulle kunna ha påverkat producerande länder, så att oljepriset påverkats, men det finns även andra faktorer som faktiskt har en påverkan på oljepriset och som fått verka i det tysta. Libyens produktion har haft problem och efterfrågan har fått skjuts av den ekonomiska återhämtningen som sker i hela världen. Oljepriset befinner sig i en positiv trend rent tekniskt. Priset har gott stöd vid 110 dollar per fat, men motstånd vid 118 dollar ungefär. Fortfarande handlas oljepriset inom det prisintervall som varit rådande sedan tre år tillbaka.
Terminskurvorna för Brent (den översta) och den av lager- och transportkapacitet strypta marknaden för West Texas Intermediate ligger lite lägre.
Tidningen Energy Risk skrev i fredags en artikel om att de höga priserna lockat fram en våg av prissäkring från amerikanska oljebolag. Dessa säljer framtida produktion på termin och lyckas på så sätt minska risken i sin verksamhet. De gör detta trots att terminspriserna är lägre än spotpriserna därför att de vinner i minskad osäkerhet. De är med andra ord villiga att betala försäkringspremien till dem som köper terminerna – och bär risken i deras ställe.
För råvaruinvesterare är den här rabatten nu väldigt attraktiv. Man kan tjäna ca 7 – 10% extra på att äga råoljeterminer.
Råoljelagren fortsätter att minska i USA.
Importen år 2013 (röd) minskade i den senaste rapporten från DOE.
När nu priset fallit tillbaka och rabatten på terminer är så attraktiv, tycker vi att det är ett bra tillfälle att komma in i den lönsamma oljemarknaden och rekommenderar köp av OLJA S. Det är framförallt rabatten på terminerna vi vill komma åt och därför föredrar vi OLJA S framför t ex BULL OLJA X4 S.
Elektricitet
Nedan ser vi prisdiagrammet på det första kvartalets 2014 kontrakt. Det är det kontrakt som är underliggande för certifikaten sedan början på månaden.
Man har gjort försök att få igång O3:an i veckan, utan att lyckas. Finnarna har inte heller fått igång sin. Kärnkraften går just nu på halva sin installerade kapacitet.
Väderleksprognoserna visar fortsatt blött. Det ostadiga vädret väntas komma nu.
Tekniskt har motståndet vid 41.35 hållit stånd. Det är inte otänkbart att blötare väder och kärnkraftverk som kommer igång, kan få priset att rekylera ner från fredagens stängningspris på 41.90 euro per MWh. En sådan rekyl betraktar vi som ett utmärkt köptillfälle.
Som nämnt ovan, har den nordiska kärnkraften fortsätta problem. I fredags producerades endast 51% av den installerade kapaciteten. OKG kommer att starta om Oskarshamn 3 klockan 15:00 på tisdag. Reaktorn har varit avstängd sedan den 1 september och tre försök att återstarta den har misslyckats. OKG har skjutit upp starten av Orskarshamn 1 från i torsdags till måndagen. Reaktorn har varit avstängd sedan den 9 juli pga ventilproblem. PVO kommer att återstarta Olkiluoto 2 på tisdag. Reaktorn stängdes i måndags förra veckan pga en överhettad generator. Ringhals 2, Ringhals 3, Orskarshamn 2 och Loviisa 2 var avstängda för det årliga underhållet.
Hydrologisk balans har fortsatt att försämras, särskilt prognosen.
Marginalkostnaden för att producera el bestäms av priset på kol och priset på utsläppsrätter. Nedan ser vi priset på utsläppsrätter i euro / ton. Notera den fortsatta prisuppgången.
Nedan ser vi terminspriset för månaden, på energikol i Rotterdam. Vi ser att marknaden har vänt uppåt. Trenden är bruten. Detta har indirekt, men helt säkert, en påverkan på prisnivån på nordisk elektricitet. Vi väntar oss en fortsatt återhämtning i kolpriset åtminstone upp till 95 dollar per ton. Och därmed motsvarande prisuppgång på nordisk elektricitet. Dessutom tror vi på en procentuellt sett väsentligt högre prisuppgång på utsläppsrätter.
Vi rekommenderar alltså köp av el, t ex EL S eller BULL EL X4 S.
Naturgas
Naturgaspriset studsade på 3.60 i veckan och stängde i fredags på 3.75. Tekniskt motstånd ligger på 3.80.
Vi har neutral rekommendation.
Guld & Silver
Guldpriset föll ned till stödet på 1300 dollar per troy uns, efter att ha brutit stödet för uppgången från juni / juli. Vi har tidigare sagt att vi betraktar hela uppgången från juni / juli som en rekyl mot den fallande trenden. Goldman Sachs publicerade en rapport i fredags, där de säger att priset på guld kan falla så långt som till 1000 dollar per troy uns. Goldman Sachs har emellertid en tendens att göra prognoser som påminner om rena extrapoleringar av trender. Det går sällan så långt som Goldman Sachs analytiker har förutspått. Vi delar dock vyn att priset på guld förmodligen kommer att falla vidare. I det riktigt korta perspektivet noterar vi dock att 1300 dollar är ett starkt tekniskt stöd, varifrån marknaden kan samla kraft och göra ett nytt försök uppåt.
Nedan ser vi kursdiagrammet för silver i dollar per troy ounce. Då och då ser man att handlare hänger upp sig på 55-dagars glidande medelvärde och priset studsade i fredags precis på den nivå som det ligger på, som vi ser i diagrammet nedan. Går priset under den nivån, kan priset gå till 20 dollar, annars kan det gå pp mot 24 dollar. Notera att toppen i slutat av augusti inte lyckades bryta motståndet för den fallande pristrenden. Vi är alltså fortfarande i en bear market för silver.
Nedan ser vi kvoten mellan guldpriset och silverpriset.
Silverpriset har i den allmänna prisnedgången, i vanlig ordning, fallit mer än guld.
Vi fortsätter att vara neutrala guld och silver och skulle inte vilja köpa någon av dem idag.
Platina & Palladium
Förra veckan skrev vi att platina då brutit stödet för uppgången. Resultatet ser vi nu, där priset fallit ordentligt, ned till nivåer som utgjorde stöd under juli – augusti. Det vore inte otänktbart med en rekyl uppåt i det riktigt korta perspektivet, men vi ser inte detta som en trendvändning, utan som en rekyl i en fallande pristrend.
Nedan ser i kvoten mellan platina och guld. I slutet av förra veckan steg platina i förhållande till guld, men vi ser detta som en kortsiktig ”blip” och tror att platina kan falla tillbaka.
Palladiumpriset är håller på att bryta ner från den triangel vi skrivit om tidigare. Kursfallet kan bli stort.
Vi är för närvarande neutrala platina och palladium, men om palladium skulle falla bara något lite ytterligare, skulle vi vilja haka på och ta en kort position via BEAR PALLAD X4 S. Vi skulle absolut inte vilja köpa någon av dem.
Koppar
Priset på koppar var i princip oförändrat i veckan som gick. Trenden är nedåtriktad, men priset är förhållandevis lågt. Vi fortsätter med neutral vy.
Det är en svårtolkad bild och vi rekommenderar neutral position.
Aluminium
Förra veckan noterade en marginell prisnedgång som stannade på 1812 dollar per ton. Stöd finns vid 1800 dollar. Går priset under den nivån skulle vi vilja vara korta, dvs köpta BEAR ALU X4 S.
Vi har neutral rekommendation, tidigare köp.
Zink
Priset på zink har i nästan två års tid legat inom ett intervall mellan 1718.50 dollar per ton och 2200 dollar per ton, som vi ser nedan. Den röda linjen visar lagren av zink vid LME. Vi ser att marknaden börjat komma mer i balans. Detta fortsatte i veckan som gick. De rekordstora lagren har börjat minska. Det finns en förväntan om en stor inleverans till tredje onsdagen i september, den 18 september, eftersom detta skett både i maj och i juli. Analytiker har noterat att detta kan hänga ihop med lagerfinansieringsaffärer utanför LME-systemet.
Den senaste ILZG-rapporten indikerar dock att det finns en starkare efterfrågan och att balansen förbättras, vilket gör ett aluminium-scenario mindre sannolikt. Stöd finns vid 1850 dollar per ton, som vi tror att marknaden håller sig över.
Vi fortsätter med en försiktig köprekommendation, av ZINK S.
Nickel
Nickelpriset följde den generella tendensen under veckan och stängde på veckans lägsta nivå, där priset balanserar på det tekniska stödet 13675 dollar per ton. Marknaden förväntar sig en återhämtning av fysisk efterfrågan under årets sista kvartal, huvudsakligen drivet av Kina. Produktionen av rostfritt stål steg med 11% i Kina under det första halvåret i år, huvudsakligen från 300-serien, som innehåller 8 – 10% nickel, enligt CRU. Efter en långsammare takt under det tredje kvartalet, tror CRU på en återhämtning under det fjärde. Det skulle innebära en ökning av efterfrågan på 13% i årstakt. Med det stora lager som finns skulle detta verkligen behövas för att få marknaden i balans. En faktor som skulle kunna leda till ökad efterfrågan är den premie för nickel i nickel pig iron vi nämnde i förra veckans brev. Att vi ser att cancellerade warrants (lagerbevis) vid LME nu uppgår till 20% av LME:s lager, kan vara ett tecken på ökad efterfrågan på primärnickel. Nya ”cancellations” rapporteras från Malaysia, där allt nickel i lager har levererats in från Kina. Det är nu möjligt att det här lagret går tillbaka till Kina. Det finns alltså några tecken på förbättringar i marknadsläget, men nickel har förmodligen en lång väg att gå innan vi ser en rejäl återhämtning.
[box]SEB Veckobrev Veckans råvarukommentar är producerat av SEB Merchant Banking och publiceras i samarbete och med tillstånd på Råvarumarknaden.se[/box]
Disclaimer
The information in this document has been compiled by SEB Merchant Banking, a division within Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) (“SEB”).
Opinions contained in this report represent the bank’s present opinion only and are subject to change without notice. All information contained in this report has been compiled in good faith from sources believed to be reliable. However, no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made with respect to the completeness or accuracy of its contents and the information is not to be relied upon as authoritative. Anyone considering taking actions based upon the content of this document is urged to base his or her investment decisions upon such investigations as he or she deems necessary. This document is being provided as information only, and no specific actions are being solicited as a result of it; to the extent permitted by law, no liability whatsoever is accepted for any direct or consequential loss arising from use of this document or its contents.
About SEB
SEB is a public company incorporated in Stockholm, Sweden, with limited liability. It is a participant at major Nordic and other European Regulated Markets and Multilateral Trading Facilities (as well as some non-European equivalent markets) for trading in financial instruments, such as markets operated by NASDAQ OMX, NYSE Euronext, London Stock Exchange, Deutsche Börse, Swiss Exchanges, Turquoise and Chi-X. SEB is authorized and regulated by Finansinspektionen in Sweden; it is authorized and subject to limited regulation by the Financial Services Authority for the conduct of designated investment business in the UK, and is subject to the provisions of relevant regulators in all other jurisdictions where SEB conducts operations. SEB Merchant Banking. All rights reserved.
Analys
Not below USD 70/b and aiming for USD 80/b

Saudi Arabia again reminded the global oil market who is king. Oil price is ticking carefully upwards today as investors are cautious after having burned their fingers in the production cut induced rally to (almost) USD 90/b which later faltered. We expect more upside price action later today in the US session. The 1 m b/d Saudi cut in July is a good tactic for the OPEC+ meeting on 4-6 July. Unwind if not needed or force all of OPEC+ to formal cut or else….Saudi could unwind in August. The cut will unite Saudi/Russia and open for joint cuts if needed. I.e. it could move Russia from involuntary reductions to deliberate reductions

Adjusting base-lines and formalizing and extending May cuts to end of 2024. OPEC+ this weekend decided to extend and formalize the voluntary agreement of cuts in May. These cuts will now be and overall obligation for the group to produce 40.5 m b/d on average in 2024 (not including natural gas liquids). There were some adjustments to reference production levels where African members got lower references as they have been unable to fill their quotas. UAE on the other hand got a 200 k b/d increase in its reference production level to match actual capacity increases. It was also a discussion of whether to change the baseline for Russia’s production. But these changes in baselines won’t make any immediate changes to production.
Unilateral cut of 1 m b/d by Saudi in July. The big surprise to the market was the unilateral 1 m b/d cut of Saudi Arabia for July. To start with it is for July only though it could be extended. The additional cut will
1) Make sure the oil price won’t fall below 70
2) Prevent inventories from rising
3) Help prevent capex spending in upstream oil and gas globally is not getting yet another trough
4) Make for a great tactical negotiation setup for next OPEC+ meeting on 4-6 July
a) If the 1 m b/d July cut is unnecessary, then it will be un-winded for August
b) If it indeed was needed then Saudi can strong-arm rest of OPEC+ to make a combined cut from August. Else Saudi could revive production by 1 m b/d from August and price will fall.
5) It is roughly aligning actual production by Russia and Saudi Arabia. Actually it is placing Saudi production below Russian production. But basically it is again placing the two core OPEC+ members on equal footing. Thus opening the door for combined Saudi/Russia cuts going forward if needed.
Saudi produced / will produce /Normal production:
April: 10.5
May: 10.0
June: 10.0
July: 9.0
Normal prod: 10.1
Oil price to strengthen further. Especially into the US session today. We expect crude oil prices to strengthen further and especially into the US session today. Price action has been quite careful in response to the surprise 1 m b/d cut by Saudi Arabia so far today. Maybe it is because it is only for one month. But mostly it is probably because the market in recent memory experienced that the surprise cut for May sent the Dated Brent oil price to USD 88.6/b in mid-April before it again trailed down to almost USD 70/b. So those who joined the rally last time got burned. They are much more careful this time around.
USD 80/b is the new USD 60/b and that is probably what Saudi Arabia is aiming for. Not just because that is what Saudi Arabia needs but also because that is what the market needs. We have seen a sharp decline in US oil rig count since early December last year and that has taken place at an average WTI price of USD 76/b and Brent average of USD 81/b. Previously the US oil rig count used to expand strongly with oil prices north of USD 45/b. Now instead it is declining at prices of USD 75-80/b. Big difference. Another aspect is of course inflation. US M2 has expanded by 35% since Dec 2019 and so far US CPI has increased by 17% since Dec 2019. Assume that it will rise altogether by 30% before all the stimulus money has been digested. If the old oil price normal was USD 60/b then the new should be closer to USD 80/b if adjusting for a cumulative inflation increase of 30%. But even if we just look at nominal average prices we still have USD 80/b as a nominal average from 2007-2019. But that is of course partially playing with numbers.
Still lots of concerns for a global recession, weakening oil demand and lower oil prices due to the extremely large and sharp rate hikes over the past year. That is the reason for bearish speculators. But OPEC+ has the upper hand. This is what we wrote recently on that note: ”A recession is no match for OPEC+”
Aligning Saudi production with Russia. Russian production has suffered due to sanctions. With a 1 m b/d cut in July Saudi will be below Russia for the first time since late 2021. Russia and Saudi will again be equal partners. This opens up for common agreements of cuts. Reduced production by Russia since the invasion has been involuntary. Going forward Russia could make deliberate cuts together with Saudi.

Short specs in Brent and WTI at 205 m barrels as of Tuesday last week. They will likely exit shorts and force the oil price higher.

Long vs. Short specs in Brent and WTI at very low level as of Tuesday last week. Will probably bounce back up.

US oil rig count has declined significantly since early Dec-2022 at WTI prices of USD 76/b and Brent of USD 81/b (average since Dec-2022).

Historical oil prices in nominal and CPI adjusted terms. Recent market memory is USD 57.5/b average from 2015-2019. But that was an extremely bearish period with booming US shale oil production.

Analys
A recession is no match for OPEC+

History shows that OPEC cuts work wonderfully. When OPEC acts it changes the market no matter how deep the crisis. Massive 9.7 m b/d in May 2020. Large cuts in Dec 2008. And opposite: No-cuts in 2014 crashed the price. OPEC used to be slow and re-active. Now they are fast and re-active. Latest cut indicates a ”reaction-function” with a floor price of USD 70/b. Price could move lower than that in May, but JMMC meeting on 4 June and full OPEC+ meeting on 5-6 July would then change the course. Fresh cuts now in May will likely drive market into deficit, inventory draws, stronger prices. Sell-offs in May should be a good buying opportunities

Production cuts by OPEC+ do work. They work wonderfully. Deep cuts announced by OPEC in December 2008 made the oil price bottom at USD 33.8/b on Christmas Eve. That is USD 48.3/b adj. for CPI. The oil price then collapsed in 2014 when it became increasingly clear during the autumn that OPEC would NOT defend the oil price with confirmation of no-cuts in December that year. The creation of OPEC+ in the autumn of 2016 then managed to drive the oil price higher despite booming US shale oil production. A massive 9.7 m b/d cut in production in May 2020 onward made the oil price shoot higher after the trough in April 2020.
Historical sequence pattern is first a price-trough, then cuts, then rebound. This history however points to a typical sequence of events. First we have a trough in prices. Then we get cuts by OPEC(+) and then the oil price shoots back up. This probably creates an anticipation by the market of a likewise sequence this time. I.e. that the oil price first is going to head to USD 40/b, then deep cuts by OPEC+ and then the rebound. If we get an ugly recession.
But OPEC+ is faster and much more vigilant today. Historically OPEC met every half year. Assessed the situation and made cuts or no cuts in a very reactive fashion. That always gave the market a long lead-time both in terms of a financial sell-off and a potential physical deterioration before OPEC would react.
But markets are faster today as well with new information spreading to the world almost immediately. Impact of that is both financial and physical. The financial sell-off part is easy to understand. The physical part can be a bit more intricate. Fear itself of a recession can lead to a de-stocking of the oil supply chain where everyone suddenly starts to draw down their local inventories of crude and products with no wish to buy new supplies as demand and prices may be lower down the road. This can then lead to a rapid build-up of crude stocks in the hubs and create a sense of very weak physical demand for oil even if it is still steady.
Deep trough in prices is possible but would not last long. Faster markets and faster OPEC+ action means we could still have a deep trough in prices but they would not last very long. Oil inventories previously had time to build up significantly when OPEC acted slowly. When OPEC then finally made the cuts it would take some time to reverse the inventory build-up. So prices would stay lower for longer. Rapid action by OPEC+ today means that inventories won’t have time to build up to the same degree if everything goes wrong with the economy. Thus leading to much briefer sell-offs and sharper and faster re-bounds.
OPEC+ hasn’t really even started cutting yet. Yes, we have had some cuts announced with 1.5 m b/d reduction starting now in May. But this is only bringing Saudi Arabia’s oil production back to roughly its normal level around 10 m b/d following unusually high production of 11 m b/d in Sep 2022. So OPEC+ has lots of ”dry powder” for further cuts if needed.
OPEC reaction function: ”USD 70/b is the floor”. The most recent announced production cut gave a lot of information. It was announced on 2nd of April and super-fast following the 20th of March when Dated Brent traded to an intraday low of USD 69.27/b.
JMMC on 4 June and OPEC+ meeting on 5-6 July. Will cut if needed. OPEC+ will now spend the month of May to assess the effects of the newest cuts. The Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee (JMMC) will then meet on 4 June and make a recommendation to the group. If it becomes clear at that time that further cuts are needed then we’ll likely get verbal intervention during June in the run-up to 5-6 July and then fresh cuts if needed.
Oil man Biden wants a price floor of USD 70/b as well. The US wants to rebuild its Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR) which now has been drawn down to about 50%. It stated in late 2022 that it wanted to buy if the oil price fell down to USD 67 – 72/b. Reason for this price level is of course that if it falls below that then US shale oil production would/could start to decline with deteriorating energy security for the US. Latest signals from the US administration is that the rebuilding of the SPR could start in Q3-23.
A note on shale oil activity vs. oil price. The US oil rig count has been falling since early December 2022 and has been doing so during a period when the Dated Brent price has been trading around USD 80/b.
IMF estimated social cost-break-even oil price for the different Middle East countries. As long as US shale oil production is not booming there should be lots of support within OPEC+ to cut production in order to maintain the oil price above USD 70/b. Thus the ”OPEC+ reaction-function” of a USD 70/b floor price. But USD 80/b would even satisfy Saudi Arabia.

US implied demand and products delivered is holding up nicely YoY and on par with 2019. So far at least. Seen from an aggregated level.

Total US crude and product stocks including SPR. Ticking lower. Could fall faster from May onward due to fresh cuts by OPEC+ of 1.5 m b/d

An oil price of USD 95/b in 2023 would place cost of oil to the global economy at 3.3% of Global GDP which is equal to the 2000 – 2019 average.

Analys
Mixed signals on demand but world will need more oil from OPEC but the group is cutting

A world where OPEC(+) is in charge is a very different world than we are used to during the ultra-bearish 2015-19 period where US shale AND offshore non-OPEC production both were booming. Brent averaged USD 58/b nominal and USD 70/b in real terms that period. The Brent 5yr contract is trading at USD 66/b nominal or USD 58.6/b in real-terms assuming no market power to OPEC+ in 2028. Could be, but we don’t think so as US Permian shale is projected by major players to peak next 5yrs. When OPEC(+) is in charge the group will cut according to needs. For Saudi that is around USD 85/b but maybe as high as USD 97/b if budget costs rise with inflation

No major revisions to outlook by the IEA last week in its monthly Oil Market Report.
Total demand to rise 2 m b/d, 90% of demand growth from non-OECD and 57% from Jet fuel. Total demand to rise by 2 m b/d YoY to 101.9 m b/d where 90% of the gain is non-OECD. Jet fuel demand to account for 57% of demand growth as global aviation continues to normalize post Covid-19. Demand for 2022 revised down by 0.1 m b/d and as a result so was the 2023 outlook (to 101.9 m b/d). Non-OPEC supply for 2023 was revised up by 0.1 m b/d. Call-on-OPEC 2023 was reduced by 0.2 m b/d as a result to 29.5 m b/d. Call-on-OPEC was 28.8 m b/d in Q4-22. The group produced 28.94 m b/d in Mar (Argus).
World will need more oil from OPEC. Call-on-OPEC to rise 1.6 m b/d from Q4-22 to Q4-23. IEA is forecasting a call-on-OPEC in Q4-23 of 30.4 m b/d. The world will thus need 1.6 m b/d more oil from OPEC YoY in Q4-23 and 0.46 m b/d more than it produced in March. Counter to this though the OPEC group decided to cut production by 1 m b/d from May to the end of the year. So from May onward the group will produce around 28 m b/d while call-on-OPEC will be 29.1 m b/d, 30.3 m b/d and 30.4 m b/d in Q2,3,4-23.
If the IEA is right about demand then the coming OPEC cuts should drive inventories significantly lower and oil prices higher.
But the market doesn’t quite seem to buy into this outlook. If it had then prices would have moved higher. Prices bumped up to USD 87.49/b intraday on 12 April but have since fallen back and Brent is falling back half a percent today to USD 85.9/b.
Market is concerned for declining OECD manufacturing PMI’s. It is of course the darkening clouds on the macro-sky which is making investors concerned about the outlook for oil products demand and thus crude oil demand. Cross-currents in global oil product demand is making the situation difficult to assess. On the one hand there are significant weakening signals in global diesel demand along with falling manufacturing PMIs. The stuff which makes the industrial world go round. Manufacturing, trucking, mining and heavy duty vehicles all need diesel. (Great Blbrg story on diesel here.) Historically recessions implies a cyclical trough in manufacturing activity, softer diesel demand and falling oil prices. So oil investors are naturally cautious about buying into the bull-story based on OPEC cuts alone.
Cross-currents is making demand growth hard to assess. But the circumstances are much more confusing this time around than in normal recession cycles because: 1) Global Jet fuel demand is reviving/recovering post Covid-19 and along with China’s recent reopening. IEA’s assessment is that 57% of global demand growth this year will be from Jet fuel. And 2) Manufacturing PMIs in China and India are rising while OECD PMIs are falling.
These cross-currents in the demand picture is what makes the current oil market so difficult to assess for everyone and why oil prices are not rallying directly to + USD 100/b. Investors are cautious. Though net-long specs have rallied 137 m b to 509 m b since the recent OPEC cuts were announced.
The world will need more oil from OPEC in 2023 but OPEC is cutting. The IEA is projecting that non-OPEC+ supply will grow by 1.9 m b/d YoY and OPEC+ will decline by 0.8 m b/d and in total that global supply will rise 1.2 m b/d in 2023. In comparison global demand will rise by 2.0 m b/d. At the outset this is a very bullish outlook but the global macro-backdrop could of course deteriorate further thus eroding the current projected demand growth of 2 m b/d. But OPEC can cut more if needed since latest cuts have only brought Saudi Arabia’s production down to its normal level.
OPEC has good reasons to cut production if it can. IEA expects global oil demand to rise 2 m b/d YoY in 2023 and that call-on-OPEC will lift 1.6 m b/d from Q4-22 to Q4-23. I.e. the world needs more oil from OPEC in 2023. But OPEC will likely produce closer to 28 m b/d from May to Dec following latest announced production cuts

Market has tightened with stronger backwardation and investors have increased their long positions

Net long specs in Brent + WTI has bounced since OPEC announcement on coming cuts.

Saudi Arabia’s fiscal cost-break-even was USD 85/b in 2021 projected the IMF earlier. Don’t know when it was projected, but looks like it was before 2020 and thus before the strong rise in inflation. If we add 15% US inflation to the 2021 number we get USD 97/b. Inflation should lift budget costs in Saudi Arabia as it is largely a USD based economy. Though Saudi Arabia’s inflation since Q4-19 is reported as 8% to data while Saudi cost-of-living-index is up by 11%. Good reason for Saudi Arabia to cut if it can cut without loosing market share to US shale.

Adjusting for inflation both on a backward and forward basis. The 5yr Brent price is today at USD 66.3/b but if we adjust for US 5yr inflation it is USD 58.6/b in real terms. That is basically equal to the average Brent spot price from 2015-2019 which was very bearish with booming shale and booming offshore non-OPEC. Market is basically currently pricing that Brent oil market in 5yrs time will be just as bearish as the ultra-bearish period from 2015-2019. It won’t take a lot to beat that when it comes to actual delivery in 2028.

Nominal Brent oil prices and 5yr Brent adj. for 5yr forward inflation expectations only

ARA Diesel cracks to Brent were exceptionally low in 2020/21 and exceptionally high in 2022. Now they are normalizing. Large additions to refining capacity through 2023 will increase competition in refining and reduce margins. Cuts by OPEC+ will at the same time make crude oil expensive. But diesel cracks are still significantly higher than normal. So more downside before back to normal is achieved.

-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Lundin-familjen har sålt allt i Africa Oil
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Dansk kärnkraft ska producera 1 miljon ton koldioxidfritt gödningsmedel per år i Indonesien
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Guldpriset nära sin högsta nivå någonsin
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Koppar gynnas av den gröna omställningen
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Ryssland förstör Saudiarabiens oljeförsäljning i Asien
-
Nyheter2 dagar sedan
Exxon Mobil ska dubbla utvinningen av olja från skifferfälten med teknisk utveckling
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Priset på olivolja det högsta någonsin
-
Nyheter1 vecka sedan
Så ser planen ut för ny kärnkraft i Sverige enligt Vattenfall