Analys
SEB Jordbruksprodukter, 6 maj 2013

USA var kallt och vått förra veckan, med frost och snö på många håll, ända nere i Texas. I torsdags fick norra Mellanvästern 35 cm snö. Höstvetets kondition försämrades i måndagens rapport från 35% ”good” och ”excellent condition” till 33% (redan innan förra veckans snö och frost). Sådden av majs ökade med bara 1% till veckan innan förra veckan, till rekordlåga 5%. Antagligen har väldigt lite blivit sått i veckan som gick. Det får vi facit på i kväll. Sojabönor har ännu inte kommit igång med sådden. Allt annat lika bör en allt för stor försening av majssådden leda till att sojabönor vinner areal.
WASDE-rapporten kommer på fredag och nästa veckas brev kommer därför att innehålla en genomgång av den.
Den som vill lyssna på en tvåtimmars genomgång av WASDE-rapporten, och hur man analyserar marknaden samt placerar framgångsrikt i marknaden genom certifikat, är välkommen till ett seminarium hos SEB i Malmö.
Odlingsväder
USA var kallt och vått med frost och snö ända nere i Texas. 35 cm snö föll i torsdags över norra Mellanvästern. Kanada var varmare och torrare. I Europa var det lite nederbörd i norr, men desto mer på den södra halvan av kontinenten. Australien var huvudsakligen fortsatt torrt.
Nedan ser vi prognostiserad avvikelse från normal temperatur i USA.
Nedan ser vi prognostiserad avvikelse från normal nederbörd i Europa.
World Ag Weather publicerar även avvikelser från det normala för regn och temperatur för viktiga jordbruksområden. De har till och med bemödat sig om att vikta avvikelsen efter jordbruksareal. Vi ser att större delen av jorden är kallare än normalt. Vissa delar av Argentina har fått väsentligt mycket mindre nederbörd än normalt och USA tvärtom mycket mer än normalt.
Vi noterar också att Kina är väsentligt mycket kallare än normalt. Eventuella negativa effekter av det på väntad skörd har än så länge inte blivit kända.
Vete
Priset på november (2013) har stabiliserat sig över 210 euro per ton. Trenden är alltjämt nedåtriktad, men den här sidledes rörelsen är ändå ett observandum. Det är möjligt att pristrenden nedåt håller på att förlora momentum och att en prisuppgång kan ta vid. Det beror helt på vädret. Möjligen kan WASDE-rapporten på fredag bli utslagsgivande.
Decemberkontraktet på CBOT har stigit upp till motståndet på 758 cent per ton. Vi ser att det finns ytterligare ett motstånd på ca 780 cent, om 758 skulle brytas.
Ser vi på den senaste veckan förändring av terminskurvorna, ser vi att priserna gått upp både i Europa och i USA och ungefär lika mycket på alla löptider.
Nedan ser vi Crop condition från förra måndagens rapport.
Måndagens Crop Progress rapport från USDA visar att tillståndet för det amerikanska höstvetet är fortsatt dystert. 35% klassas nu som ”poor/very poor”, en ökning med 2% från veckan innan och att jämföra med 10% vid samma tid förra året. Höstvete klassat som ”good/excellent” har minskat med samma mängd och uppgår nu till 33%, vilket är den lägsta nivån sedan 1996, medan förra årets siffra vid samma tid låg på 64%. Dessutom har endast 14% av höstvetet gått i ax, vilket är långt efter förra årets 55% vid samma tid. I Kansas, den största producenten av HRW vete, backade höstvete i kategorin ”good/excellent” med 3% till 27%.
Det blöta och kalla vädret fortsätter också att försena de amerikanska lantbrukarnas sådd av vårvete. Endast 12% av sådden var avklarad per den 29 april, vilket är långt under det femåriga genomsnittet på 37%.
Crop condition för vintervetet i USA ligger kvar på den historiskt låga nivån, som vi ser i diagrammet nedan. Y-axeln visar hur många procent av arealen som har vete i ”good” eller ”excellent condition”.
The Kansas Crop Tour publicerade sin gissning på skörden; endast 313 mbu mot 383 mbu förra året.
Oklahoma Wheat Commission publicerade sitt estimat till 85 mbu mot 155 mbu förra året.
Vi fortsätter, med det observandum vi nämnt ovan, att tro på sidledes eller lägre priser. Uppgångar bör ses som tillfällen att sälja.
Maltkorn
Priset på maltkorn med leverans i november har ännu en vecka fortsatt att visa mer styrka än höstvetet / kvarnvetet på Matif.
Majs
Majspriset (december 2013) steg kraftigt när vädret slog och om det visade sig att sådden blivit ytterligare försenad. Priset har åtminstone kortsiktigt etablerat sig över 550 cent. Det KAN bli en trendvändning uppåt. Det återstår att se.
Sådden ligger kraftigt efter i USA. Nedan ser vi såddens framåtskridande i USA. 6-årsintervallet sträcker sig från 2007 till 2012.
Medelvärdet för de sex åren 2006 – 2012 är 33% klart. Den långsammaste starten var 2008, när 10% var sått. Nu är det alltså bara 5%, en marginell ökning från 4% en vecka tidigare men fortfarande långt under förra årets 49% vid den här tiden och även under det genomsnittet. Iowa, den största producenten, har nu påbörjat sådden men endast 2% är avklarad så här långt – att jämföra med det femåriga genomsnittet på 36%. Sådden av majs i de två andra stora producentstaterna, Illinois och Indiana, står fortfarande och stampar på 1% då kraftiga regnskurar i kombination med kallare väder än normalt har gjort att många fält fortfarande är alltför blöta.
Nedan ser vi en karta över staterna i ”Corn belt”, färgkodade efter hur många procent som är sått och med procentsiffran på kartan.
Det sägs att den 10 maj är en slags deadline för sådden. Den majs som sås efter det datumet ger lägre avkastning. Farmdoc har emellertid skrivit att även om skörden blir 14% mindre än den skulle blivit enligt den hektarskörd som man räknat med, kommer majsen att räcka till efterfrågan. En av de efterfrågeposter som ökat de senaste åren är efterfrågan till etanol. Den kommer inte att öka i år, eftersom USA redan nått maximal inblandning i bensinen av etanol. Foderefterfrågan kommer också att vara tämligen konstant. Med 14% lägre skörd räcker majsen till efterfrågan och ger en viss ökning av utgående lager, enligt Farmdoc. Det finns alltså en hel del marginal i den väntade skördens storlek.
Sojabönor
Sojabönorna (november 2013) anser jag befinner sig i negativ trend och vi ser en rekyl upp från 1200 cent. En rekyl är en naturlig och temporär fluktuation mot trenden.
Exporten från Brasilien börjar ta mer fart nu, efter de initiala problemen att få ut nästan 20 miljoner ton mer än förra året. Kinas tillväxt håller på att bromsa in. Nya svaga siffror kom i veckan. Den senaste köttskandalen där fårkött i egentligen kommit från flera andra djur. Det enda som stack ut med sin frånvaro av förklarliga skäl var hund. De här skandalerna och den allt jämt pågående nya fågelinfluensan gör att efterfrågan på soja borde vara dämpad framöver i Kina.
Man kan spekulera i att sojaarealen i USA borde bli större när den inte kan sås med majs. Arealen är antagligen inte utbytbar 1:1, inte minst pga behovet av utsäde. Marken är visserligen kvävegödslad sedan länge, men detta är en ”sunk cost” och även om det inte är till stor nytta för sojabönorna, så är det i vart fall inte till nackdel. Blir det fortsatt kallt drabbar vädret dock även sojaarealen.
Jag skulle passa på och sälja sojabönor på högre priser, eftersom trenden och fundamenta så väl pekar på lägre priser. Jag har svårt att se hur WASDE-rapporten kan bli positiv för marknaden
Raps
I flera veckor har vi noterat att rapspriset byggt upp fallhöjd i förhållande till det allt lägre sojabönspriset. I veckan som gick orkade inte rapsmarknaden hålla emot den kraften med fallande pris som följd. Den lilla nedgång som hittills ägt rum tror vi bara är början på en nedgång, som gör att priset på raps hamnar i paritet med sojapriset igen. Nedan ser vi november-terminens kursutveckling.
Skulle det tekniska stödet på 415 euro brytas, är detta en rejäl säljsignal. Om WASDE-rapporten är riktigt negativ för sojabönor skulle detta kunna inträffa. I mellantiden vill jag vara fortsatt såld raps.
[box]SEB Veckobrev Jordbruksprodukter är producerat av SEB Merchant Banking och publiceras i samarbete och med tillstånd på Råvarumarknaden.se[/box]
Disclaimer
The information in this document has been compiled by SEB Merchant Banking, a division within Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) (“SEB”).
Opinions contained in this report represent the bank’s present opinion only and are subject to change without notice. All information contained in this report has been compiled in good faith from sources believed to be reliable. However, no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made with respect to the completeness or accuracy of its contents and the information is not to be relied upon as authoritative. Anyone considering taking actions based upon the content of this document is urged to base his or her investment decisions upon such investigations as he or she deems necessary. This document is being provided as information only, and no specific actions are being solicited as a result of it; to the extent permitted by law, no liability whatsoever is accepted for any direct or consequential loss arising from use of this document or its contents.
About SEB
SEB is a public company incorporated in Stockholm, Sweden, with limited liability. It is a participant at major Nordic and other European Regulated Markets and Multilateral Trading Facilities (as well as some non-European equivalent markets) for trading in financial instruments, such as markets operated by NASDAQ OMX, NYSE Euronext, London Stock Exchange, Deutsche Börse, Swiss Exchanges, Turquoise and Chi-X. SEB is authorized and regulated by Finansinspektionen in Sweden; it is authorized and subject to limited regulation by the Financial Services Authority for the conduct of designated investment business in the UK, and is subject to the provisions of relevant regulators in all other jurisdictions where SEB conducts operations. SEB Merchant Banking. All rights reserved.
Analys
Tariffs deepen economic concerns – significantly weighing on crude oil prices

Brent crude prices initially maintained the gains from late March and traded sideways during the first two trading days in April. Yesterday evening, the price even reached its highest point since mid-February, touching USD 75.5 per barrel.

However, after the U.S. president addressed the public and unveiled his new package of individual tariffs, the market reacted accordingly. Overnight, Brent crude dropped by close to USD 4 per barrel, now trading at USD 71.6 per barrel.
Key takeaways from the speech include a baseline tariff rate of 10% for all countries. Additionally, individual reciprocal tariffs will be imposed on countries with which the U.S. has the largest trade deficits. Many Asian economies end up at the higher end of the scale, with China facing a significant 54% tariff. In contrast, many North and South American countries are at the lower end, with a 10% tariff rate. The EU stands at 20%, which, while not unexpected given earlier signals, is still disappointing, especially after Trump’s previous suggestion that there might be some easing.
Once again, Trump has followed through on his promise, making it clear that he is serious about rebalancing the U.S. trade position with the world. While some negotiation may still occur, the primary objective is to achieve a more balanced trade environment. A weaker U.S. dollar is likely to be an integral part of this solution.
Yet, as the flow of physical goods to the U.S. declines, the natural question arises: where will these goods go? The EU may be forced to raise tariffs on China, mirroring U.S. actions to protect its industries from an influx of discounted Chinese goods.
Initially, we will observe the effects in soft economic data, such as sentiment indices reflecting investor, industry, and consumer confidence, followed by drops in equity markets and, very likely, declining oil prices. This will eventually be followed by more tangible data showing reductions in employment, spending, investments, and overall economic activity.
Ref oil prices moving forward, we have recently adjusted our Brent crude price forecast. The widespread imposition of strict tariffs is expected to foster fears of an economic slowdown, potentially reducing oil demand. Macroeconomic uncertainty, particularly regarding tariffs, warrants caution regarding the pace of demand growth. Our updated forecast of USD 70 per barrel for 2025 and 2026, and USD 75 per barrel for 2027, reflects a more conservative outlook, influenced by stronger-than-expected U.S. supply, a more politically influenced OPEC+, and an increased focus on fragile demand.
___
US DOE data:
Last week, U.S. crude oil refinery inputs averaged 15.6 million barrels per day, a decrease of 192 thousand barrels per day from the previous week. Refineries operated at 86.0% of their total operable capacity during this period. Gasoline production increased slightly, averaging 9.3 million barrels per day, while distillate (diesel) production also rose, averaging 4.7 million barrels per day.
U.S. crude oil imports averaged 6.5 million barrels per day, up by 271 thousand barrels per day from the prior week. Over the past four weeks, imports averaged 5.9 million barrels per day, reflecting a 6.3% year-on-year decline compared to the same period last year.
The focus remains on U.S. crude and product inventories, which continue to impact short-term price dynamics in both WTI and Brent crude. Total commercial petroleum inventories (excl. SPR) increased by 5.4 million barrels, a modest build, yet insufficient to trigger significant price movements.
Commercial crude oil inventories (excl. SPR) rose by 6.2 million barrels, in line with the 6-million-barrel build forecasted by the API. With this latest increase, U.S. crude oil inventories now stand at 439.8 million barrels, which is 4% below the five-year average for this time of year.
Gasoline inventories decreased by 1.6 million barrels, exactly matching the API’s reported decline of 1.6 million barrels. Diesel inventories rose by 0.3 million barrels, which is close to the API’s forecast of an 11-thousand-barrel decrease. Diesel inventories are currently 6% below the five-year average.
Over the past four weeks, total products supplied, a proxy for U.S. demand, averaged 20.1 million barrels per day, a 1.2% decrease compared to the same period last year. Gasoline supplied averaged 8.8 million barrels per day, down 1.9% year-on-year. Diesel supplied averaged 3.8 million barrels per day, marking a 3.7% increase from the same period last year. Jet fuel demand also showed strength, rising 4.2% over the same four-week period.


Analys
Brent on a rollercoaster between bullish sanctions and bearish tariffs. Tariffs and demand side fears in focus today

Brent crude rallied to a high of USD 75.29/b yesterday, but wasn’t able to hold on to it and closed the day at USD 74.49/b. Brent crude has now crossed above both the 50- and 100-day moving average with the 200dma currently at USD 76.1/b. This morning it is trading a touch lower at USD 74.3/b

Brent riding a rollercoaster between bullish sanctions and bearish tariffs. Biden sanctions drove Brent to USD 82.63/b in mid-January. Trump tariffs then pulled it down to USD 68.33/b in early March with escalating concerns for oil demand growth and a sharp selloff in equities. New sanctions from Trump on Iran, Venezuela and threats of such also towards Russia then drove Brent crude back up to its recent high of USD 75.29/b. Brent is currently driving a rollercoaster between new demand damaging tariffs from Trump and new supply tightening sanctions towards oil producers (Iran, Venezuela, Russia) from Trump as well.
’Liberation day’ is today putting demand concerns in focus. Today we have ’Liberation day’ in the US with new, fresh tariffs to be released by Trump. We know it will be negative for trade, economic growth and thus oil demand growth. But we don’t know how bad it will be as the effects comes a little bit down the road. Especially bad if it turns into a global trade war escalating circus.
Focus today will naturally be on the negative side of demand. It will be hard for Brent to rally before we have the answer to what the extent these tariffs will be. Republicans lost the Supreme Court race in Wisconsin yesterday. So maybe the new Tariffs will be to the lighter side if Trump feels that he needs to tread a little bit more carefully.
OPEC+ controlling the oil market amid noise from tariffs and sanctions. In the background though sits OPEC+ with a huge surplus production capacity which it now will slice and dice out with gradual increases going forward. That is somehow drowning in the noise from sanctions and tariffs. But all in all, it is still OPEC+ who is setting the oil price these days.
US oil inventory data likely to show normal seasonal rise. Later today we’ll have US oil inventory data for last week. US API indicated last night that US crude and product stocks rose 4.4 mb last week. Close to the normal seasonal rise in week 13.
Analys
Oil gains as sanctions bite harder than recession fears

Higher last week and today as sanctions bite harder than recession fears. Brent crude gained 2% last week with a close on Friday of USD 73.63/b. It traded in a range of USD 71.8-74.17/b. It traded mostly higher through the week despite sharp, new selloffs in equities along with US consumer expectations falling to lowest level since 2013 (Consumer Conf. Board Expectations.) together with signals of new tariffs from the White House. Ahead this week looms the ”US Liberation Day” on April 2 when the White House will announce major changes in the country’s trade policy. Equity markets are down across the board this morning while Brent crude has traded higher and lower and is currently up 0.5% at USD 74.0/b at the moment.

New US sanctions towards Iran and Venezuela and threats of new sanctions towards Russia. New sanctions on Venezuela and Iran are helping to keep the market tight. Oil production in Venezuela reached 980 kb/d in February following a steady rise from 310 kb/d in mid-2020 while it used to produce 2.3 mb/d up to 2016. Trump last week allowed Chevron to import oil from Venezuela until 27 May. But he also said that any country taking oil or gas from Venezuela after 2 April will face 25% tariffs on any goods exported into the US. Trump is also threatening to sanction Russian oil further if Putin doesn’t move towards a peace solution with Ukraine.
The OPEC+ to meet on Saturday 5 April to decide whether to lift production in May or not. The OPEC+ Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee will meet on Saturday 5 April to review market conditions, compliance by the members versus their production targets and most importantly decide whether they shall increase production further in May following first production hike in April. We find it highly likely that they will continue to lift production also in May.
OPEC(+) crashed the oil price twice to curb US shale, but it kicked back quickly. OPEC(+) has twice crashed the oil price in an effort to hurt and disable booming US shale oil production. First in 2014/15/16 and then in the spring of 2020. The first later led to the creation of OPEC+ through the Declaration of Cooperation (DoC) in the autumn of 2016. The second was in part driven by Covid-19 as well as a quarrel between Russia and Saudi Arabia over market strategy. But the fundamental reason for that quarrel and the crash in the oil price was US shale oil producers taking more and more market share.
The experience by OPEC+ through both of these two events was that US shale oil quickly kicked back even bigger and better yielding very little for OPEC+ to cheer about.
OPEC+ has harvested an elevated oil price but is left with a large spare capacity. The group has held back large production volumes since Spring 2020. It yielded the group USD 100/b in 2022 (with some help from the war in Ukraine), USD 81/b on average in 2023/24 and USD 75/b so far this year. The group is however left with a large spare capacity with little room to place it back into the market without crashing the price. It needs non-OPEC+ in general and US shale oil especially to yield room for it to re-enter.
A quick crash and painful blow to US shale oil is no longer the strategy. The strategy this time is clearly very different from the previous two times. It is no longer about trying to give US shale oil producers a quick, painful blow in the hope that the sector will stay down for an extended period. It is instead a lengthier process of finding the pain-point of US shale oil players (and other non-OPEC+ producers) through a gradual increase in production by OPEC+ and a gradual decline in the oil price down to the point where non-OPEC+ in general and US liquids production especially will gradually tick lower and yield room to the reentry of OPEC+ spare capacity. It does not look like a plan for a crash and a rush, but instead a tedious process where OPEC+ will gradually force its volumes back into the market.
Where is the price pain-point for US shale oil players? The Brent crude oil price dropped from USD 84/b over the year to September last year to USD 74/b on average since 1 September. The values for US WTI were USD 79/b and USD 71/b respectively. A drop of USD 9/b for both crudes. There has however been no visible reaction in the US drilling rig count following the USD 9/b fall. The US drilling rig count has stayed unchanged at around 480 rigs since mid-2024 with the latest count at 484 operating rigs. While US liquids production growth is slowing, it is still set to grow by 580 kb/d in 2025 and 445 kb/d in 2026 (US EIA).
US shale oil average cost-break-even at sub USD 50/b (BNEF). Industry says it is USD 65/b. BNEF last autumn estimated that all US shale oil production fields had a cost-break-even below USD 60/b with a volume weighted average just below USD 50/b while conventional US onshore oil had a break-even of USD 65/b. A recent US Dallas Fed report which surveyed US oil producers did however yield a response that the US oil industry on average needed USD 65/b to break even. That is more than USD 15/b higher than the volume weighted average of the BNEF estimates.
The WTI 13-to-24-month strip is at USD 64/b. Probably the part of the curve controlling activity. As such it needs to move lower to curb US shale oil activity. The WTI price is currently at USD 69.7/b. But the US shale oil industry today works on a ”12-month drilling first, then fracking after” production cycle. When it considers whether to drill more or less or not, it is typically on a deferred 12-month forward price basis. The average WTI price for months 13 to 24 is today USD 64/b. The price signal from this part of the curve is thus already down at the pain-point highlighted by the US shale oil industry. In order to yield zero growth and possibly contraction in US shale oil production, this part of the curve needs to move below that point.
The real pain-point is where we’ll see US drilling rig count starting to decline. We still don’t know whether the actual average pain-point is around USD 50/b as BNEF estimate it is or whether it is closer to USD 65/b which the US shale oil bosses say it is. The actual pain-point is where we’ll see further decline in US drilling rig count. And there has been no visible change in the rig count since mid-2024. The WTI 13-to-24-month prices need to fall further to reveal where the US shale oil industry’ actual pain-point is. And then a little bit more in order to slow production growth further and likely into some decline to make room for reactivation of OPEC+ spare capacity.
The WTI forward price curve. The average of 13 to 24 month is now USD 64.3/b.

The average 13-to-24-month prices on the WTI price curve going back to primo January 2022. Recently dropping below USD 65/b for some extended period.

-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
USA är världens största importör av aluminium
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Oversold. Rising 1-3mth time-spreads. Possibly rebounding to USD 73.5/b before downside ensues
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Unable to rebound as the US SPX is signaling dark clouds on the horizon
-
Analys3 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Not so fragile yet. If it was it would have sold off more yesterday
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Priset på koppar skiljer sig åt efter tariffer
-
Analys2 veckor sedan
Oil prices climb, but fundamentals will keep rallies in check
-
Analys1 vecka sedan
Crude oil comment: Ticking higher as tariff-panic eases. Demand growth and OPEC+ will be key
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
På 15 år eldar Kina lika mycket kol som USA gjort under hela sin historia