Analys

OPEC sänker produktionen

Publicerat

8 år sedan

den

1 december, 2016

Handelsbanken - Råvarubrevet - Nyhetsbrev om råvaror

Opec beslutade idag att för första gången på åtta år sänka produktionen frivilligt för att försöka höja priset. Gruppen sänker produktionen med 1,2 Mbpd och icke Opec-länder kommer bidra med ytterligare 0,6 Mbpd, varav Ryssland står för 0,3 Mbpd. Knäckfrågan verkar ha varit Irak och Iran som slutligen kom till förhandlingsbordet och gick med på Saudiarabiens inslagna väg för att stabilisera oljemarknaden. Iran får som enda medlem lov att öka produktionen och Ryssland anslöt sig till en sänkning trots att man tidigare enbart sträckt sig till att frysa produktionen.

Enkel plan

Planen ser ganska enkel ut i backspegeln. Opec vill att de globala lagernivåerna ska falla. Lägre lager betyder att mycket av den kraftiga lutningen I terminskurvan försvinner. Hittills har terminer med leverans i framtiden handlats md en kraftig premie gentemot spot. Den premien har varit en huvudvärk för Opec då den oproportionell gynnar USA:s skifferproducenter. Dessa har korta ledtider och en extremt kort återbetalningstid på nya produktionsprojekt. Därmed kan de utnyttja kortvariga prisuppgångar och säkra sin produktion med hjälp av den premium de får i terminsmarknaden. Opec vill helt enkelt stänga den dörren.

Detaljerna

Venezuela, Nigeria och Libyen tillåts stå utanför avtalet. Dessa länder kan alltså öka sin produktion efter bästa förmåga.

Iran får lov att öka sin produktion med 90 kbpd från september månads nivåer inom sex månader. Kan de inte öka omedelbart har de alltså den produktionen i ”reserv”.

Nästa möte hålls den 25e maj. Avtalet gäller fram till dess men med intentionen att förlängas ytterligare sex månader om det fungerat väl.

Indonesien fryser sitt medlemskap i Opec efter att landet svängt till att bli nettoimportör. Indonesien ingår i gruppens produktionsmål på 32,5 Mbpd men kommer inte delta i en produktionssänkning.

Skifferoljans respons

Även på andra sidan Atlanten är det Opec:s besked en stor nyhet. Nu återstår det att se hur skifferproducenterna kommer respondera om Opec lyckas hålla priserna på en högre nivå.

[box]Research disclaimers[/box]

Handelsbanken Capital Markets, a division of Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ) (collectively referred to herein as ‘SHB’), is responsible for the preparation of research reports. SHB is regulated in Sweden by the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority, in Norway by the Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway, in Finland by the Financial Supervisory Authority and in Denmark by the Danish Financial Supervisory Authority. All research reports are prepared from trade and statistical services and other information that SHB considers to be reliable. SHB has not independently verified such information and does not represent that such information is true, accurate or complete. Accordingly, to the extent permitted by law, neither SHB, nor any of its directors, officers or employees, nor any other person, accept any liability whatsoever for any loss, however it arises, from any use of such research reports or its contents or otherwise arising in connection therewith.

In no event will SHB or any of its affiliates, their officers, directors or employees be liable to any person for any direct, indirect, special or consequential damages arising out of any use of the information contained in the research reports, including without limitation any lost profits even if SHB is expressly advised of the possibility or likelihood of such damages.

The views contained in SHB research reports are the opinions of employees of SHB and its affiliates and accurately reflect the personal views of the respective analysts at this date and are subject to change. There can be no assurance that future events will be consistent with any such opinions. Each analyst identified in this research report also certifies that the opinions expressed herein and attributed to such analyst accurately reflect his or her individual views about the companies or securities discussed in the research report.

Annons

Research reports are prepared by SHB for information purposes only. The information in the research reports does not constitute a personal recommendation or personalised investment advice and such reports or opinions should not be the basis for making investment or strategic decisions. This document does not constitute or form part of any offer for sale or subscription of or solicitation of any offer to buy or subscribe for any securities nor shall it or any part of it form the basis of or be relied on in connection with any contract or commitment whatsoever. Past performance may not be repeated and should not be seen as an indication of future performance. The value of investments and the income from them may go down as well as up and investors may forfeit all principal originally invested. Investors are not guaranteed to make profits on investments and may lose money. Exchange rates may cause the value of overseas investments and the income arising from them to rise or fall. This research product will be updated on a regular basis.

No part of SHB research reports may be reproduced or distributed to any other person without the prior written consent of SHB. The distribution of this document in certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law and persons into whose possession this document comes should inform themselves about, and observe, any such restrictions.

Please be advised of the following important research disclosure statements:

SHB employees, including analysts, receive compensation that is generated by overall firm profitability. Analyst compensation is not based on specific corporate finance or debt capital markets services. No part of analysts’ compensation has been, is or will be directly or indirectly related to specific recommendations or views expressed within research reports.

From time to time, SHB and/or its affiliates may provide investment banking and other services, including corporate banking services and securities advice, to any of the companies mentioned in our research.

According to the Bank’s Ethical Guidelines for the Handelsbanken Group, the board and all employees of the Bank must observe high standards of ethics in carrying out their responsibilities at the Bank, as well as other assignments. The Bank has also adopted Guidelines concerning Research which are intended to ensure the integrity and independence of research analysts and the research department, as well as to identify actual or potential conflicts of interests relating to analysts or the Bank and to resolve any such conflicts by eliminating or mitigating them and/or making such disclosures as may be appropriate. As part of its control of conflicts of interests, the Bank has introduced restrictions (“Information barriers”) on communications between the Research department and other departments of the Bank. In addition, in the Bank’s organisational structure, the Research department is kept separate from the Corporate Finance department and other departments with similar remits. The Guidelines concerning Research also include regulations for how payments, bonuses and salaries may be paid out to analysts, what marketing activities an analyst may participate in, how analysts are to handle their own securities transactions and those of closely related persons, etc. In addition, there are restrictions in communications between analysts and the subject company. For full information on the Bank’s ethical guidelines please see the Bank’s website www.handelsbanken.com and click through to About the bank – Investor relations – Corporate social responsibility – Ethical guidelines.

Handelsbanken has a ZERO tolerance of bribery and corruption. This is established in the Bank’s Group Policy on Bribery and Corruption. The prohibition against bribery also includes the soliciting, arranging or accepting bribes intended for the employee’s family, friends, associates or acquaintances.

Relaterade ämnen:handelsbanken analys olja

Nästa

SEB Råvarubrev 6 december 2016

Missa inte

SEB Råvarubrev 29 november 2016

Fortsätt läsa

Annons

Analys

June OPEC+ quota: Another triple increase or sticking to plan with +137 kb/d increase?

Publicerat

2 dagar sedan

den

2 maj, 2025

Redaktionen

Rebounding from the sub-60-line for a second time. Following a low of USD 59.3/b, the Brent July contract rebounded and closed up 1.8% at USD 62.13/b. This was the second test of the 60-line with the previous on 9 April when it traded to a low of USD 58.4/b. But yet again it defied a close below the 60-line. US ISM Manufacturing fell to 48.7 in April from 49 in March. It was still better than the feared 47.9 consensus. Other oil supportive elements for oil yesterday were signs that there are movements towards tariff negotiations between the US and China, US crude oil production in February was down 279 kb/d versus December and that production by OPEC+ was down 200 kb/d in April rather than up as expected by the market and planned by the group.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

All eyes on OPEC+ when they meet on Monday 5 May. What will they decide to do in June? Production declined by 200 kb/d in April (to 27.24 mb/d) rather than rising as the group had signaled and the market had expected. Half of it was Venezuela where Chevron reduced activity due to US sanctions. Report by Bloomberg here. Saudi Arabia added only 20 kb/d in April. The plan is for the group to lift production by 411 kb/d in May which is close to 3 times the monthly planned increases. But the actual increase will be much smaller if the previous quota offenders, Kazakhstan, Iraq and UAE restrain their production to compensate for previous offences.

The limited production increase from Saudi Arabia is confusing as it gives a flavor that the country deliberately aimed to support the price rather than to revive the planned supply. Recent statements from Saudi officials that the country is ready and able to sustain lower prices for an extended period instead is a message that reviving supply has priority versus the price.

OPEC+ will meet on Monday 5 May to decide what to do with production in June. The general expectation is that the group will lift quotas according to plans with 137 kb/d. But recent developments add a lot of uncertainty to what they will decide. Another triple quota increase as in May or none at all. Most likely they will stick to the original plan and decide lift by 137 kb/d in June.

US production surprised on the downside in February. Are prices starting to bite? US crude oil production fell sharply in January, but that is often quite normal due to winter hampering production. What was more surprising was that production only revived by 29 kb/d from January to February. Weekly data which are much more unreliable and approximate have indicated that production rebounded to 13.44 mb/d after the dip in January. The official February production of 13.159 mb/d is only 165 kb/d higher than the previous peak from November/December 2019. The US oil drilling rig count has however not change much since July last year and has been steady around 480 rigs in operation. Our bet is that the weaker than expected US production in February is mostly linked to weather and that it will converge to the weekly data in March and April.

Where is the new US shale oil price pain point? At USD 50/b or USD 65/b? The WTI price is now at USD 59.2/b and the average 13 to 24 mth forward WTI price has averaged USD 61.1/b over the past 30 days. The US oil industry has said that the average cost break even in US shale oil has increased from previous USD 50/b to now USD 65/b with that there is no free cashflow today for reinvestments if the WTI oil price is USD 50/b. Estimates from BNEF are however that the cost-break-even for US shale oil is from USD 40/b to US 60/b with a volume weighted average of around USD 50/b. The proof will be in the pudding. I.e. we will just have to wait and see where the new US shale oil ”price pain point” really is. At what price will we start to see US shale oil rig count starting to decline. We have not seen any decline yet. But if the WTI price stays sub-60, we should start to see a decline in the US rig count.

US crude oil production. Monthly and weekly production in kb/d.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Unusual strong bearish market conviction but OPEC+ market strategy is always a wildcard

Publicerat

4 dagar sedan

den

30 april, 2025

Redaktionen

Brent crude falls with strong conviction that trade war will hurt demand for oil. Brent crude sold off 2.4% yesterday to USD 64.25/b along with rising concerns that the US trade war with China will soon start to visibly hurt oil demand or that it has already started to happen. Tariffs between the two are currently at 145% and 125% in the US and China respectively which implies a sharp decline in trade between the two if at all. This morning Brent crude (June contract) is trading down another 1.2% to USD 63.3/b. The June contract is rolling off today and a big question is how that will leave the shape of the Brent crude forward curve. Will the front-end backwardation in the curve evaporate further or will the July contract, now at USD 62.35/b, move up to where the June contract is today?

The unusual ”weird smile” of Brent forward curve implies unusual strong bearish conviction amid current prompt tightness. the The Brent crude oil forward curve has displayed a very unusual shape lately with front-end backwardation combined with deferred contango. Market pricing tightness today but weakness tomorrow. We have commented on this several times lately and Morgan Stanly highlighted how unusual historically this shape is. The reason why it is unusual is probably because markets in general have a hard time pricing a future which is very different from the present. Bearishness in the oil market when it is shifting from tight to soft balance usually comes creeping in at the front-end of the curve. A slight contango at the front-end in combination with an overall backwardated curve. Then this slight contango widens and in the end the whole curve flips to full contango. The current shape of the forward curve implies a very, very strong conviction by the market that softness and surplus is coming. A conviction so strong that it overrules the present tightness. This conviction flows from the fundamental understanding that ongoing trade war is bad for the global economy, for oil demand and for the oil price.

Will OPEC+ switch to cuts or will it leave balancing to a lower price driving US production lower? Add of course also in that OPEC+ has signaled that it will lift production more rapidly and is currently no longer in the mode of holding back to keep Brent at USD 75/b due to an internal quarrel over quotas. That stand can of course change from one day to the next. That is a very clear risk to the upside and oil consumers around should keep that in the back of their minds that this could happen. Though we are not utterly convinced of the imminent risk of this. Before such a pivot happens, Iraq and Kazakhstan probably have to prove that they can live up to their promised cuts. And that will take a few months. Also, OPEC+ might also like to see where the pain-point for US shale oil producers’ price-vise really is today. So far, we have seen no decline in the number of US oil drilling rigs in operation which have steadily been running at around 480 rigs.

With a surplus oil market on the horizon, OPEC+ will have to make a choice. How shale this coming surplus be resolved? Shall OPEC+ cut in order to balance the market or shall lower oil prices drive pain and lower production in the US which then will result in a balanced market? Maybe it is the first or maybe the latter. The group currently has a bloated surplus balance which it needs to slim down at some point. And maybe now is the time. Allowing the oil price to slide. Economic pain for US shale oil producers to rise and US oil production to fall in order to balance the market and make room OPEC+ to redeploy its previous cuts back into the market.

Surplus is not yet here. US oil inventories likely fell close to 2 mb last week. US API yesterday released indications that US crude and product inventories fell 1.8 mb last week with crude up 3.8 mb, gasoline down 3.1 mb and distillates down 2.5 mb. So, in terms of a crude oil contango market (= surplus and rising inventories) we have not yet moved to the point where US inventories are showing that the global oil market now indeed is in surplus. Though Chinese purchases to build stocks may have helped to keep the market tight. Indications that Saudi Arabia may lift June Official Selling Prices is a signal that the oil market may not be all that close to unraveling in surplus.

The low point of the Brent crude oil curve is shifting closer to present. A sign that the current front-end backwardation of the Brent crude oil curve is about to evaporate.

Brent crude versus US Russel 2000 equity index. Is the equity market too optimistic or the oil market too bearish?

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Oil demand at risk as US consumers soon will face hard tariff-realities

Publicerat

6 dagar sedan

den

28 april, 2025

Redaktionen

Muted sideways trading. Brent crude traded mostly sideways last week, but due to a relatively strong close on the Friday before, it ended the week down 1.6% at USD 66.87/b with a high-low range of USD 65.29 – 68.65/b. So muted price range action. Brent crude is trading marginally higher, up 0.3%, this morning amid mixed equity and commodity markets.

Strong Chinese buying in April as oil prices dipped. Chinese imports of crude continued to accelerate in April following a surge in March with data from Kepler indicating that Chinese imports averaged near 11 mb/d in April. That is an 18mth high and strongly up versus only 8.9 mb/d in January (FT.com today). That has most certainly helped to stem the rot in the oil price which bottomed at an intraday low of USD 58.4/b on 9 April. It has probably also helped to keep the front-end of the Brent crude oil forward curve in consistent backwardation. The strong buying from China is both opportunistic stockpiling due to the price slump but also rebuilding of oil inventories in general.

Oil speculators are cautious with oil demand at risk as US consumers soon will face hard tariff-realities. But oil market speculators are far from bullish. While net long speculative positions are up 52.2 mb over the week to last Tuesday, it is still only the 15th lowest speculative positioning over the past 52 weeks. The underlying concern is of course the US tariffs which is crippling exports of goods from China to the US with bookings of container freight down by 30% according to Hapag-Lloyd. Bloomberg’s Chief US economist, Anna Wong, is saying that empty shelves in US shops will soon be the reality. Thus US-China trade relations need to be fixed quickly to avoid hard realities for US consumers. The lead-times are long and the current tariffs and uncertainty around these is now risking availability for US consumer goods for the holiday seasons in H2-25. Tariff realities for US consumers are increasingly just around the corner. ”Rubber will hit the road” very soon and that is when we might see weaker oil demand as well.

Brent crude traded mostly sideways last week though ended down 1.6% in the end.