Analys
Market does not care about US shale, but it should. It is now growing as it did in 2014
Yesterday’s US EIA Drilling Productivity Report (DPR) showed that US crude oil production is now growing at a marginal rate of 1.3 mb/d/yr and as strongly as it did in 2014. If we adjust for increased well productivity then completions of wells in December stood 27% above the 2014 average. We estimate that volume drilling productivity rose 23% from 4Q16 to 4Q17. Drilling is still running well ahead of completions and we estimate that the number of rigs could decline by 200 rigs without hurting the current marginal production growth. Unless there is a significant set-back in global oil markets or sentiment or in the US shale space with a drop in completions per month we should see US crude production averaging close to 10.7 mb/d in 2018 thus growing 1.38 mb/d y/y average 2017 to average 2018. In addition comes US NGL’s growth of 0.5 mb/d y/y which will bring total US liquids growth to 1.88 mb/d for average 2017 to average 2018.
Yesterday’s US DPR report showed that shale oil production is growing as strongly now as it did in 2014 when it grew at a monthly rate of 114 k bl/d/mth (1.4 mb/d rate).
The EIA estimates that US shale oil production will grow by 110 k bl/d from Jan to Feb which is a marginal rate of 1.3 mb/d. This is in stark contrast to EIA’s latest monthly oil report which predicted crude oil production from US lower 48 states (ex Gulf of Mexico) would only grow at a rate of 33 k bl/d in 1Q18 and on average only 42 k bl/d through 2018.
Yesterday’s DPR report shows that US shale oil production is growing 160% faster than what the US EIA uses in its STEO report assumptions for 2018 forecast. It shows that the US EIA will have to revise its US crude oil production forecast for 2018 significantly higher. It has revised it upwards in its last four reports. It is far from done doing so in our view.
US shale oil volume productivity growth (new oil per rig in operation) is in our calculations up 23% y/y 4Q17 to 4Q16. This is in strong contrast to EIA’s official productivity measure of zero growth which is not taking account of the huge build-up of DUCs.
Drilling of wells is still running significantly ahead of completions with the inventory of uncompleted wells rising by 156 wells in December. Completions are struggling to catch up. Either drilling will have to fall or completions will have to speed up in order to prevent a further build-up of DUCs. Players should kick out 100 drilling rigs in order to get drilling in line with completions. In order to draw down the DUC inventory they should kick out another 100 rigs more and thus a total 200 rigs while keeping completions at current level. The market should thus not be optimistic on prices due to a decline in US drilling rig count.
Completions of wells rose to (1091) the highest level since April 2015. However, if the number of completions is adjusted for increasing well productivity then well completions in December 2017 came in at the highest level since these data started in Jan 2014 and 27% higher than well completions on average in 2014.
In our view it seems reasonable to assume that US shale oil production will grow at its current speed through 2018 which means a total growth of 1.32 mb/d from Dec-17 to Dec-18. In addition comes a growth of 180 k bl/d from non-shale bringing the total US crude oil growth in 2018 to 1.5 mb/d. This will place US crude oil production at 10.68 mb/d on average for 2018 which is up 1.38 mb/d from 2017 average of 9.3 mb/d. In addition comes a 0.5 mb/d growth in US NGLs bringing total US liquids growth to 1.88 mb/d y/y average 2017 to average 2018.
Chart 1: US shale oil production to a new all-time-high in February
Growing like it did in 2014.
Chart 2: US shale oil production growing as strongly as it did in 2014
Chart 3: The number of drilled but uncompleted wells is still growing briskly
Thus drilling is running ahead of completions. Completions trying to catch up.
Players should kick out 200 drilling rigs in order to draw down the DUCs
Chart 4: US volume drilling productivity is up 23% from 4Q16 to 4Q17 in our calculations
That is very different from the official US EIA drilling productivity measure which does not take account of the shifts in the DUC inventory
Chart 5: Thus US shale oil volume drilling productivity per rig never really declined y/y
Instead it has stayed at a pretty solid level of around +-20% y/y
Chart 6: Today’s drilling rig count is 21% above the average 2014 count in real terms
Adjusting historical rig count with today’s official US EIA drilling productivity
Official US drilling productivity is today 2.6 times as high as it was on average in 2014
Kind regards
Bjarne Schieldrop
Chief analyst, Commodities
SEB Markets
Merchant Banking
Analys
Oil product price pain is set to rise as the Strait of Hormuz stays closed into summer
Market is starting to take US/Iran headlines with a pinch of salt. Brent crude rose $2.8/b yesterday to an official close of $112.1/b. But after that it traded as low as $108.05/b before ending late night at around $109.7/b. Through the day it traded in a range of $106.87 – 112.72/b amid a flurry of news or rumors from Iran and the US. ”US temporary sanctions during negotiations” (falls alarm). ”We will bomb Iran” (not anyhow),… etc. While the market is still fluctuating to this kind of news flow, it is starting to take such headlines with a pinch of salt.

We’ll see. Maybe, maybe not. The Brent M1 contract is trading at $110.2/b this morning which very close to the average ticks through yesterday of $110.4/b.
Trump with bearish, verbal intervention whenever Brent trades above $110/b it seems. What seems to be a pattern is that Trump states something like ”very good negotiations going on with Iran”, ”New leaders in Iran are great,..”, ”Great progress in negotiations,…”, ”Deal in sight,..” etc whenever the Brent M1 contract trades above $110/b. An effort to cool the market. These hot air verbal interventions from Trump used to have a heavy bearish impact on prices, but they now seems to have less and less effect unless they are backed by reality.
As far as we can see there has been no real progress in the negotiations between the US and Iran with both sides still standing by their previous demands.
Iran is getting stronger while the cease fire lasts making a return to war for Trump yet harder. Iran is naturally in constant preparation for a return to war given Trump’s steady threats of bombing Iran again. Iran is naturally doing what ever is possible to prepare for a return to war. And every day the cease fire lasts it is better prepared. This naturally makes it more and more difficult and dangerous for the US to return to warring activity versus Iran as the consequences for energy infrastructure in the Persian Gulf will be more and more severe the longer the cease fire lasts. Israel seems to see it this way as well. That the war is not won and that current frozen state of a cease fire gives Iran opportunity to rebuild military and politically.
Global inventories are drawing down day by day. How much? In the meantime the Strait of Hormuz stays closed. There is varying measures and estimates of how much global inventories are drawing down. Our rough estimate, back of the envelope, is that global inventories are drawing down by at least some 10 mb/d or about 300 mb/d in a balance between loss of supply versus demand destruction. Other estimates we see are a monthly draw of 250-270 mb/d. The IEA only ’measured’ a draw in global observable stocks of 117 mb in April with oil on water rising 53 mb while on shore stocks fell 170 mb. But global stocks are hard to measure with large invisible, unmeasured stocks. As such a back of the envelope approach may be better.
Oil products is what the world is consuming. Oil product prices likely to rise while product stocks fall. Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR) are predominantly crude oil. Discharging oil from OECD SPR stocks, a sharp reduction in Chinese crude imports and a reduction in global refinery throughput of 6-7 mb/d has helped to keep crude oil markets satisfactorily supplied. But global inventories are drawing down none the less. And oil products is really what the world is consuming. So if global refinery throughput stays subdued, then demand will eventually have to match the supply of oil products. The likely path forward this summer is a steady draw down in jet fuel, diesel and gasoline. Higher prices for these. Then, if possible, higher refinery throughput and higher usage of crude in response to very profitable refinery margins. And lastly sharper draw in crude stocks and higher prices for these. But some 6 mb/d of oil products used to be exported through the Strait of Hormuz. And it may not be so easy to ramp up refinery activity across the world to compensate. Especially as Ukraine continues to damage Russian refineries as well as Russian crude production and export facilities.
Watch oil product stocks and prices as well as Brent calendar 2027. What to watch for this summer is thus oil product inventories falling and oil product premiums to crude rising. Another measure to watch is the Brent crude 2027 contract as it rises steadily day by day as the Strait of Hormuz stays closed and global oil inventories decline. The latter is close to the highest level since the start of the war and keeps rising.
The Brent M1 contract and the Brent 2027 prices and current price of jet fuel in Europe (ARA). All in USD/b

Our back of the envelope calculation of the global shortage created by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Note that 3.5 mb/d of discharge from SPR is also a draw. Note also that ’Forced demand loss’ of 2.5 mb/d is probably temporary and will fall back towards zero as logistics are sorted out leaving ’Price demand loss’ to do the job of balancing the market. Thus a shortfall of at least 9 mb/d created by the closure. More if SPR discharge is included and more if Forced demand loss recedes.

Analys
Brent crude up USD 9/bl on the week… ”deal around the corner” narrative fades
Brent is climbing higher. Front-month is at USD 106.3/bl this morning, close to a weekly high and a USD 9/bl jump from Mondays open. This is the move we flagged as a risk earlier in the week: the market shifting from ”a deal is around the corner” to ”this is going to take longer than we thought”.

Analyst Commodities, SEB
During April, rest-of-year Brent remained remarkably stable around USD 90/bl. A stability which rested on one single assumption: the SoH reopens around 1 May. That assumption is now slowly falling apart.
As we highlighted yesterday: every week of delay beyond 1 May adds (theoretically) ish USD 5/bl to the rest-of-year average, as global inventories draw 100 million barrels per week. i.e., a mid-May reopening implies rest-of-year Brent closer to USD 100/bl, and anything pushing into June or July takes us meaningfully higher.
What’s changed in the last 48 hours:
#1: The US military has formally warned that clearing suspected sea mines from SoH could take up to six months. That is a completely different timescale from what the financial market is pricing. Even a political deal tomorrow does not immediately reopen the strait.
#2: Trump has shifted his tone from urgency to ”strategic patience”. In yesterday’s press conference: ”Don’t rush me… I want a great deal.” The market is reading this as a president no longer feeling pressured by timelines, with the naval blockade running in the background.
#3: So far, the military activity is escalating, not de-escalating. Axios reports Iran is laying more mines in SoH. The US 3rd carrier strike group (USS George H.W. Bush) is arriving with two countermine vessels. Trump yesterday ordered the US Navy to destroy any Iranian boats caught laying mines. While CNN reports that the Pentagon is actively drawing up plans to strike Iranian SoH capabilities and individual Iranian military leaders if the ceasefire collapses. i.e., NOT a attitude consistent with an imminent deal!
Spot crude and product prices eased off the early-April highs on a combination of system rerouting and deal optimism. Both now weakening. Goldman estimates April Gulf output is reduced by 14.5 mbl/d, or 57% of pre-war supply, a number that keeps getting worse the longer this drags on.
Demand-side adaptation is ongoing: S. Korea has cut its Middle East crude dependence from 69% to 56% by pulling more from the Americas and Africa, and Japan is kicking off a second round of SPR releases from 1 May. But SPRs are finite.
Ref. to the negotiations, we should not bet on speed. The current Iranian leadership is dominated by genuine hardliners willing to absorb economic pain and run the clock to extract concessions. That is not a setup for a rapid resolution. US/Israeli media briefings keep framing the delay as ”internal Iranian divisions”, the reality is more complicated and points toward weeks and months, not days.
Our point is that the complexity is large, and higher prices have only just started (given a scenario where the negotiations drag out in time). The market spent April leaning on the USD 90/bl rest-of-year assumption; that case is diminishing by the hour. If ”early May reopening” is replaced by ”June, July or later” over the next week or two, both crude and products have meaningful room to reprice higher from here. There is a high risk being short energy and betting on any immediate political resolution(!).
Analys
Market Still Betting on Timely Resolution, But Each Day Raises Shortage Risk
Down on Friday. Up on Monday. The Brent June crude oil contract traded down 5.1% last week to a close of $90.38/b. It reached a high of $103.87/b last Monday and a low of $86.09/b on Friday as Iran announced that the Strait of Hormuz was fully open for transit. That quickly changed over the weekend as the US upheld its blockade of Iranian oil exports while Iran naturally responded by closing the SoH again. The US blew a hole in the engine room of the Iranian ship TOUSKA and took custody of the ship on Sunday. Brent crude is up 5.6% this morning to $95.4/b.

The cease-fire is expiring tomorrow. The US has said it will send a delegation for a second round of negotiations in Islamabad in Pakistan. But Iran has for now rejected a second round of talks as it views US demands as unrealistic and excessive while the US is also blocking the Strait of Hormuz.
While Brent is up 5% this morning, the financial market is still very optimistic that progress will be made. That talks will continue and that the SoH will fully open by the start of May which is consistent with a rest-of-year average Brent crude oil price of around $90/b with the market now trading that balance at around $88/b.
Financial optimism vs. physical deterioration. We have a divergence where the financial market is trading negotiations, improvements and resolution while at the same time the physical market is deteriorating day by day. Physical oil flows remain constrained by disrupted flows, longer voyage times and elevated freight and insurance costs.
Financial markets are betting that a US/Iranian resolution will save us in time from violent shortages down the road. But every day that the SoH remains closed is bringing us closer to a potentially very painful point of shortages and much higher prices.
The US blockade is also a weapon of leverage against its European and Asian allies. When Iran closed the SoH it held the world economy as a hostage against the US. The US blockade of the SoH is of course blocking Iranian oil exports. But it is also an action of disruption directed towards Europe and Asia. The US has called for the rest of the world to engaged in the war with Iran: ”If you want oil from the Persian Gulf, then go and get it”. A risk is that the US plays brinkmanship with the global oil market directed towards its European and Asian allies and maybe even towards China to force them to engage and take part. Maybe unthinkable. But unthinkable has become the norm with Trump in the White House.







