Analys
Cutting supply of “black crude” will feel like more
The point is that all crudes are not created equal. US supply of ultralight crudes and NGLs is drowning the world with light end products. As a result the gasoline refinery crack has crashed to zero. At the same time however the world is getting starved for medium to heavy molecules leading to abnormally strong refinery mid. dist. margins.
When OPEC+ now is cutting supply of at least 1.2 m bl/d of crude they are primarily cutting supply of medium sour crude or “black crude”. In exchange the market is left to consume more light to ultralight US shale oil crude and NGLs.
US shale oil typically contains about 60% medium to heavy molecules. But if we also factor in the added supply of US liquids which is NGLs etc. which contains 0% such molecules then the total comes down to only 40%. I.e. average new liquids supply in the US only contains a 40% cut on average of medium to heavy molecules.
“Black crude” (medium sour) in comparison contains close to 80% medium to heavy molecules. I.e. twice as much as the new US liquids supply. So when OPEC+ now cuts 1.2 m bl/d of “black crude” it reduces supply of medium to heavy molecules by 0.93 m bl. To make up for this the US has to lift total liquids supply by 2.3 m bl/d.
You can always break apart longer hydrocarbon molecules to medium length molecules (mid-dist. and lighter). Yes, it is an expensive process but the equipment for splitting longer hydrocarbons is still widespread in the global refining system today. All from splitting VGO (Vacuum Gas Oil) to either Gasoline (by Fluid Catalytic Crackers (FCCs) or to middle distillates (by Hydrocrackers) to breaking apart vacuum residue in Cokers to mid and light products. But merging shorter molecules and converting them to middle distillates is way more difficult and expensive and is in general not done. The exception of this is Shell’s Perl, Gas To Liquids (GTL) plant in Qatar where natural gas is converted to diesel. But that is more one of a kind.
From end 2016 to end 2018 the US has increased its hydrocarbon liquids supply by 4.2 m bl/d consisting of 2.9 m bl/d of crude and 1.3 m bl/d non-crude (typically NGL’s). The later typically contains no medium to heavy molecules while the prior contains 59% such molecules or less. In total the 4.2 m bl/d of new liquids supply in the US has added 1.7 m bl/d of medium to heavy molecules or 0.4 m bl/d per m bl/d of additional US liquids. “Black crude” however typically contains close to 78% medium to heavy molecules.
The huge change in the oil market due to the arrival of booming US shale oil is many faceted and complex. The new molecule composition in US liquids supply growth is one of many. Of this aspect we have probably only seen the start. Most new refineries are in general geared towards Middle East medium sour crude or “black crude” and the new ultralight liquids supply from the US does not match these all that well. The new Chinese INE crude contract is typically defined as medium sour crude if we look at the crude streams going into the physical delivery of this contract. That is to match the Chinese refineries.
Again, when OPEC+ now is cutting 1.2 m bl/d of black crude it is more than meets the eye. The feel of this cut will be deeper than its headline number of 1.2 m bl/d and it may not lead to all that much of a blessing for US ultralight liquids supply as producers there hope for once the cut starts to bite.
Today at 16:30 CET we’ll have the US EIA oil inventory data. They are likely to be quite bearish. Given the US EIA’s drilling productivity report this Monday we are likely going to see that the EIA lifts US crude production by 100 to 200 k bl/d versus last week. The API yesterday indicated stock changes of US crude: +3.5 m bl, Gasoline: +1.8 and Distillates: -3.4 m bl. In total a rise and also bearish for crude if that is the outcome.
Positive note: Dimondback is cutting activity in the Permian basin in 2019 in response to lower crude prices and higher costs.
Ch1: US ultralight crude versus Brent crude and Oman crude. The difference is much larger if one also includes US supply growth in NGLs
Table 1: Ultralight US shale oil contains much less medium to heavy molecules
Ch2: Mid-dist and heavy ends; much more fun than gasoline lately versus what is usually the case. Probably just the beginning.
Ch3: Crude prices falling like a rock
Ch4: US EIA drilling productivity report on Monday. Only bearish reading as of yet: higher drilling, higher DUCs, higher production, higher productivity and a marginal, annualized production rate of 1.6 m bl/d per year. Lower crude oil prices have not yet started to impact activity in December and January. But news above from Dimondback shows that prices are starting to hurt.
Analys
Crude oil comment: A little sideways with new tests towards the 80-line likely
Brent moves into sideways trading around USD 81.5/b with new tests to the 80-line likely. Brent crude traded down 0.9% yesterday to a close of USD 81.29/b and traded as low as USD 80.39/b within the day. This morning it is gaining 0.3% to USD 81.6/b. No obvious major driver for that and the move in oil is well in line with higher industrial metals this morning. The technical picture for Brent 1M is still overbought in terms of RSI at 70.2. But as Brent now has traded a bit sideways for some days the overbought bearish calculus has started to ease a bit. But new tests towards the 80-line seems likely with current RSI at 70.2.
Scott Bessent says he fully supports harder sanctions on Russian oil exports if Donald Trump wishes to use such a tool in the coming negotiations with Russia over Ukraine. That may add some support to oil this morning. The latest US sanctions towards Russia clearly have an effect with one example being the tanker Bhilva which has made a U-turn back towards Russia after having been on course to India (Bloomberg).
US EIA projects US liquids growth of 538 kb/d/y in 2025. The US EIA released its monthly STEO report earlier this week. What is clear is that the boom-years in US oil production are behind us for now. But exactly pinning down at what level US oil production will grow in 2025 is hard. The EIA forecast for US hydrocarbon liquids looks the following:
Estimated US crude oil production growth is projected to be virtually zero in 2026. But including all sources of liquids it still sums up to 312 kb/d y/y in growth. A lot or a little? If global oil demand in 2026 only grows with 1 mb/d in 2026, then the US will cover 30% of global demand growth. That is a lot. For 2025 the EIA expects a total growth in US liquids of 538 kb/d y/y.
Smaller losses in existing shale oil production. If we instead look at EIA estimates for US shale oil production right here and now and how its components are changing, we see that 1) New monthly production is 666 kb/d, 2) Losses in existing production is 622 kb/d and thus 3) Net monthly growth is 44 kb/d m/m which equals 4) A net marginal annualized growth of 12*44 of 523 kb/d/y. What stands out here is that the EIA in its December report estimated that this marginal annualization only equated to 378 kb/d/y. So, it has been lifted markedly in the latest report. It is however on a downward trajectory and as such the EIA estimate in the table above of y/y growth for US crude oil of 331 kb/d/y may be sensible.
US shale oil new production, losses in existing production, net new production and marginal, annualized production growth in kb/d/y.
Change in EIA STEO forecast from Dec-24 to Jan-25. What stands out is that estimated losses in existing production is adjusted lower by 16.8 kb/d since November. That is the marginal monthly change. In other words, production in existing production is falling less agressively than estimated in December. But a monthly decline of 622 kb/d/m is of course still massive.
Analys
Crude oil comment: The rally has legs, but it takes time to wash out ingrained bearish sentiment from H2-24
Brent crude jumped jet another 2.7%. Brent crude jumped 2.7% yesterday to USD 82.03/b following a pull-back on Tuesday. Intraday it reached USD 82.63/b and its highest level since 26 July last year. Bullish US oil inventory data was a key reason for the jump higher yesterday coming on top of a steady tightening market since early December and fresh US sanctions on Russia last week.
US crude stocks down 17.6 mb since mid-November and total US commercial stocks down 65 mb since mid-July. US crude stocks fell 2 mb last week to its lowest level since April 2022. US crude stocks have declined every week since mid-November with a total of 17.6 mb. Total US commercial oil inventories fell 3.4 mb last week and have been in steady decline of close to 300 kb/d since early July. These declines in US oil stocks are the proof of the pudding in terms of the balance of the global oil market and explains well the rising oil prices since early December.
The IEA estimates a 400 kb/d deficit in H2-24. If so, then all global draws took place in the US. The IEA released its monthly Oil Market Report (OMR) yesterday with an estimate that the global oil market ran a deficit of about 400 kb/d through H2-24. If so, then close to all inventory draws in the whole world solely took place in US inventories which drew down by around 300 kb/d. That is hard to believe.
If we assume that US inventory draws were proportional to the US demand share of the world (about 20%), then global inventory draws in H2-24 probably was closer to 0.3/20% which equals 1.5 mb/d. Maybe a bit high but estimates by FGE indicates that global inventory draws were close to 1.0 mb/d in H2-24 depending on whether you equate on apparent demand or real demand. Higher if equated on real demand.
IEA surplus in 2025 is adjusted down by 200 kb/d. In reality it is now only a surplus of 400 kb/d. We think this surplus estimate will erode further as demand will be adjusted yet higher and supply will be adjusted yet lower going forward. The IEA adjusted 2024 demand higher by 100 kb/d with base effect to 2025 with the same. It also adjusted its non-OPEC production estimate for 2025 down by 100 kb/d. The effect was that call-on-OPEC rose by 200 kb/d for 2025. The IEA still estimates that OPEC must reduce its production by 0.6 mb/d in 2025 to keep market balanced and prices steady. But within that estimate it assumes that FSU increases production by 200 kb/d as if it is not a part of OPEC+. IEA estimate for call-on-OPEC+ thus only declines by 400 kb/d y/y in 2025. We think that this surplus will evaporate as: 1) US production will likely deliver a bit lower than expected. 2) Supply will also disappoint here and there around the world. 3) Global demand estimates will be revised higher for 2024 and 2025.
The rally thus has legs, but the technical picture is still in overbought territory so there will be some pullbacks on the way higher. Unless of course we rally all the way to USD 95/b and THEN we get the technical pullback. The market still seems to have bearish skepticism deeply ingrained in its back following H2-24 doom and gloom and is partially reluctant to trade higher. But that is attitude and not fundamentals.
The Dubai 1-3 mth time-spread is going through the roof as Asian buyers scrambles for supply from the Middle East.
The average 1-3 mth time-spread of Dubai, Brent and WTI is now way up. Lots of room for Brent 1M to move USD 90-95/b
US crude stocks declined by 2 mb last week and total commercial stocks by 3.4 mb.
US commercial crude and product stocks in steady decline since June/July last year. Down 65 mb since mid-July.
US crude stocks at lowest level since 2022.
Brent 1M still overbought with RSI at 72.5. So, pullbacks will happen but from what level. On the upside the next targets are probably USD 87.95/b and USD 92.18/b.
Analys
Crude oil comment: Fundamentally very tight, but technically overbought
Technical pullback this morning even as the dollar weakens. Brent crude gained another 1.6% yesterday with a close at USD 81.01/b and an intraday high of USD 81.68/b which was the highest level since mid-August. The gain yesterday was supported by strong, further gains in the 1-3 mth time-spreads. This morning Brent is pulling back 0.6% to USD 80.5/b even though the USD is weakening 0.4% while time-spreads are strengthening even further. This makes it look like a technical pullback.
Brent is trading very weak versus current time-spreads. The current price of Brent crude at USD 80.6/b is very low versus where the 1-3 mth time spreads are trading. Brent should typically have traded somewhere between USD 80-95/b with current time-spreads when we compare where this relationship has been trading since the start of 2023. Brent is now trading in the absolute lower range of that with lots of room on the upside.
How long will the new sanctions last? Natural questions are: How long will Donald Trump leave the new sanctions operational? How strictly will they be enforced? How easily could Russia circumvent them?
A bullish H1-25 if Donald Trump leaves sanctions intact to negotiate over Ukraine. If Brent continues to trade around USD 80/b and not much higher, then the underlying assumptions must be that the new sanctions will not be enforced harshly and that they will be lifted by Donald Trump within a couple of months max. Donald Trump could however keep them in place as a leverage versus Putin in the upcoming negotiations over Ukraine. If so, they could stay intact for maybe 6 months or more which would put H1-2025 on a very bullish footing.
Fundamentally very tight, but technically overbought. Market right now looks technically overbought with RSI at 72 but also fundamentally very tight with the Dubai 1-3 mth time-spread at USD 2.74/b, its highest level since September 2023. As such the Brent crude oil price has the potential to coil up for further gains following some washing out of technically overbought dynamics. But maybe the current Asian panic over access to medium sour crude oil fades a bit over time and time-spreads ease with it.
Brent has been on a strengthening path well before the new sanctions. Worth remembering though is that Brent crude has been on a rising trend along with tightening time-spreads since early December. The latest bullishness from new US sanctions comes on top of that. Brent moving higher into the 80ies thus seems highly likely following a near term washout of technical overbought dynamics.
1-3 mth time-spread (average of Dubai, Brent and WTI spreads) versus the Brent 1M price. Very strong, bullish signals from the time-spreads, but Brent 1M is trading at the very lower level of where this relationship has been since the start of 2023. So, plenty of room for Brent 1M to move higher.
Brent 1M is technically overbought with RSI at 73. Pullbacks are likely near term to wash that out. On the low side the USD 70/b line has given solid support since mid-2023.
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Kina har förbjudit exporten av gallium till USA, Neo Performance Materials är den enda producenten i Nordamerika
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Turbulent elår avslutas med lugnare julvecka
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Solenergi i Danmark katastrofalt olönsam, största aktören har havererat
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Priset på nötkreatur det högsta någonsin i USA
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Uranbrytning ska bli tillåtet i Sverige
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Tuffa tider för stål i Europa
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Europa är den dominerande köparen av olja från USA
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Brent prices slip on USD surge despite tight inventory conditions