Följ oss

Analys

Crude oil comment – Surplus stored here or there?

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror
  • SEB - Prognoser på råvaror - CommodityCrude oil comment – Surplus stored here or there?
  • Graph 1: Deep WTI contango – Costly or impractical to store oil in the US mid-continent
  • Graph 2: US crude, gasoline and distillate stocks

Crude oil comment – Surplus stored here or there?

Today we will have the publishing of US oil inventory data at 17.00 CET. Since the start of August last year total commercial US crude and product stocks have increased by 102 million barrels. During that period we have only seen 5 weeks with declines in the net change in stocks constituted by crude + gasoline + distillates. The general take has been that the US holds a substantial capacity of the yet remaining free storage capacity for oil globally. Thus not surprisingly that has also been where we have seen the solid accumulation in oil inventories. The US is a huge net importer of oil, still the second biggest oil importer in the world. Thus when we see consistently increasing oil inventories in the US it basically means that the US is importing more oil than it needs. This has of course been impacted by logistical issues within the US regarding location of production versus consumption and crude qualities and refinery specs in combination with the earlier crude oil export ban.

In last week’s data release we saw that the net increase of crude, gasoline and distillates only came in at a +1.8 mb gain. That was the lowest gain since late December since which the average weekly gain has been running at about +10 mb per week. The Bloomberg consensus for today’s US oil inventory data released points to a total rise of 2.4 mb. The partial data set aggregated by API from its members in the US oil space did however point to a solid total decline of 4.6 mb with a significant decline in US crude stocks as well as distillates:

Mb

So what is driving this change in pattern? No more stock building in the US? On paper it looks like the US Pad II should still hold a substantial amount of free, available storage capacity for both crude and products. However, what the deep contango in the WTI curve is telling us is that it is becoming very expensive to store oil in the US mid-continent. Yes, crude stocks in Cushing Oklahoma are close to full. As such the contango in the WTI crude oil curve should be deep. However, if there was a substantial amount of storage capacity which was low cost to use, easy logistics and easily operational readily available in the vicinity of Cushing and in the Pad II region, then the close to capacity and deep contango in the WTI curve should drive oil away from Cushing and into other storage facilities in Pad II. Thus again, the deep WTI contango probably tells the market that the remaining available storage capacity in Pad II in the US may not be very cheap to utilize. This could be thus be due to several issues like cumbersome logistics or old age or that storage space is there but it is not really operationally available.

Looking at the WTI forward curve in comparison with the Brent curve the WTI curve’s accelerating, deepening contango this year is basically shouting out: It is becoming increasingly expensive to store oil in the US mid-continent. Go and store oil somewhere else.

If we today see that total US oil stocks are actually declined in the US last week as indicated by the API numbers then it is likely to have a bullish impact on oil prices. Especially if it is combined with for example a further decline in US crude oil production (data to be published together with inventory data today) in combination with the current ongoing oil price rebound on the back of the OPEC + Russia talks on production freeze. It is going to be perceived as bullish partly because it may be interpreted as if the global oil market is less in surplus now than 3-4 weeks ago. This we think is the wrong interpretation. The market is still running a surplus of some 1.5 mbpd which needs to be stored somewhere. If stocks don’t continue to rise in the US it basically means that stocks will need to rise outside of the US. It does mean that the deep contango in the WTI curve may ease a bit while the contango in the Brent curve will deepen. As such it is on the margin supportive for the WTI front month prices versus a bearish impact for the Brent front month price.

Thus do not jump on the conclusion that declining stocks in the US means that there is no global surplus. It basically means that surplus is stored somewhere else.

Graph 1: Deep WTI contango – Costly or impractical to store oil in the US mid-continent

Deep WTI contango – Costly or impractical to store oil in the US mid-continent

Graph 2: US crude, gasoline and distillate stocks

Yellow line is if further inventory rise follows last year’s trende from here.
Normally total US crude, gasoline and distillate stocks don’t increase much.
Thus the increase last year and so far this year is a reflection of the global surplus
Thus if it is becoming increasingly costly to store oil in the US then the stock building has to take plase somewhere else.

US crude, gasoline and distillate stocks

Kind regards
Bjarne Schieldrop
Chief analyst, Commodities
SEB Markets
Merchant Banking

Analys

Quadruple whammy! Brent crude down $13 in four days

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent Crude prices continued their decline heading into the weekend. On Friday, the price fell another USD 4 per barrel, followed by a further USD 3 per barrel drop this morning. This means Brent crude oil prices have crashed by a whopping USD 13 per barrel (-21%) since last Wednesday high, marking a significant decline in just four trading days. As of now, Brent crude is trading at USD 62.8 per barrel, its lowest point since February 2021.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

The market has faced a ”quadruple whammy”:

#1: U.S. Tariffs: On Wednesday, the U.S. unveiled its new package of individual tariffs. The market reacted swiftly, as Trump followed through on his promise to rebalance the U.S. trade position with the world. His primary objective is a more balanced trade environment, which, naturally, weakened Brent crude prices. The widespread imposition of strict tariffs is likely to fuel concerns about an economic slowdown, which would weaken global oil demand. This macroeconomic uncertainty, especially regarding tariffs, calls for caution about the pace of demand growth.

#2: OPEC+ hike: Shortly after, OPEC+ announced plans to raise production in May by 41,000 bpd, exceeding earlier expectations with a three-monthly increment. OPEC emphasized that strong market fundamentals and a positive outlook were behind the decision. However, the decision likely stemmed from frustration within the cartel, particularly after months of excess production from Kazakhstan and Iraq. Saudi Arabia’s Energy Minister seemed to have reached his limit, emphasizing that the larger-than-expected May output hike would only be a “prelude” if those countries didn’t improve their performance. From Saudi Arabia’s perspective, this signals: ”All comply, or we will drag down the price.”

#3: China’s retaliation: Last Friday, even though the Chinese market was closed, firm indications came from China on how it plans to handle the U.S. tariffs. China is clearly meeting force with force, imposing 34% tariffs on all U.S. goods. This move raises fears of an economic slowdown due to reduced global trade, which would consequently weaken global oil demand going forward.

#4: Saudi price cuts: At the start of this week, oil prices continued to drop after Saudi Arabia slashed its flagship crude price by the most in over two years. Saudi Arabia reduced the Arab Light OSP by USD 2.3 per barrel for Asia in May, while prices to Europe and the U.S. were also cut.

These four key factors have driven the massive price drop over the last four trading days. The overarching theme is the fear of weaker demand and stronger supply. The escalating trade war has raised concerns about a potential global recession, leading to weaker demand, compounded by the surprisingly large output hike from OPEC+.

That said, it’s worth questioning whether the market is underestimating the risk of a U.S.-Iran conflict this year.

U.S. military mobilization and Iran’s resistance to diplomacy have raised the risk of conflict. Efforts to neutralize the Houthis suggest a buildup toward potential strikes on Iran. The recent Liberation Day episode further underscores that economic fallout is not a constraint for Trump, and markets may be underestimating the threat of war in the Middle East.

With this backdrop, we continue to forecast USD 70 per barrel for this year (2025). For reference, Brent crude averaged USD 75 per barrel in Q1-2025.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Lowest since Dec 2021. Kazakhstan likely reason for OPEC+ surprise hike in May

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Collapsing after Trump tariffs and large surprise production hike by OPEC+ in May. Brent crude collapsed yesterday following the shock of the Trump tariffs on April 2 and even more so due to the unexpected announcement from OPEC+ that they will lift production by 411 kb/d in May which is three times as much as expected. Brent fell 6.4% yesterday with a close of USD 70.14/b and traded to a low of USD 69.48/b within the day. This morning it is down another 2.7% to USD 68.2/b. That is below the recent low point in early March of USD 68.33/b. Thus, a new ”lowest since December 2021” today.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Kazakhstan seems to be the problem and the reason for the unexpected large hike by OPEC+ in May. Kazakhstan has consistently breached its production cap. In February it produced 1.83 mb/d crude and 2.12 mb/d including condensates. In March its production reached a new record of 2.17 mb/d. Its crude production cap however is 1.468 mb/d. In February it thus exceeded its production cap by 362 kb/d.

Those who comply are getting frustrated with those who don’t. Internal compliance is an important and difficult issue when OPEC+ is holding back production. The problem naturally grows the bigger the cuts are and the longer they last as impatience grows over time. The cuts have been large, and they have lasted for a long time. And now some cracks are appearing. But that does not mean they cannot be mended. And it does not imply either that the group is totally shifting strategy from Price to Volume. It is still a measured approach. Also, by lifting all caps across the voluntary cutters, Kazakhstan becomes less out of compliance. Thus, less cuts by Kazakhstan are needed in order to become compliant.

While not a shift from Price to Volume, the surprise hike in May is clearly a sign of weakness. The struggle over internal compliance has now led to a rupture in strategy and more production in May than what was previously planned and signaled to the market. It is thus natural to assign a higher production path from the group for 2025 than previously assumed. Do however remember how quickly the price war between Russia and Saudi Arabia ended in the spring of 2020.

Higher production by OPEC+ will be partially countered by lower production from Venezuela and Iran. The new sanctions towards Iran and Venezuela can to a large degree counter the production increase from OPEC+. But to what extent is still unclear.

Buy some oil calls. Bullish risks are never far away. Rising risks for US/Israeli attack on Iran? The US has increased its indirect attacks on Iran by fresh attacks on Syria and Yemen lately. The US has also escalated sanctions towards the country in an effort to force Iran into a new nuclear deal. The UK newspaper TheSun yesterday ran the following story: ON THE BRINK US & Iran war is ‘INEVITABLE’, France warns as Trump masses huge strike force with THIRD of America’s stealth bombers”. This is indeed a clear risk which would lead to significant losses of supply of oil in the Middle East and probably not just from Iran. So, buying some oil calls amid the current selloff is probably a prudent thing to do for oil consumers.

Brent crude is rejoining the US equity selloff by its recent collapse though for partially different reasons. New painful tariffs from Trump in combination with more oil from OPEC+ is not a great combination.

Brent crude is rejoining the US equity selloff by its recent collapse though for partially different reasons.
Source: SEB selection and highlights, Bloomberg graph and data
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Tariffs deepen economic concerns – significantly weighing on crude oil prices

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent crude prices initially maintained the gains from late March and traded sideways during the first two trading days in April. Yesterday evening, the price even reached its highest point since mid-February, touching USD 75.5 per barrel.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

However, after the U.S. president addressed the public and unveiled his new package of individual tariffs, the market reacted accordingly. Overnight, Brent crude dropped by close to USD 4 per barrel, now trading at USD 71.6 per barrel.

Key takeaways from the speech include a baseline tariff rate of 10% for all countries. Additionally, individual reciprocal tariffs will be imposed on countries with which the U.S. has the largest trade deficits. Many Asian economies end up at the higher end of the scale, with China facing a significant 54% tariff. In contrast, many North and South American countries are at the lower end, with a 10% tariff rate. The EU stands at 20%, which, while not unexpected given earlier signals, is still disappointing, especially after Trump’s previous suggestion that there might be some easing.

Once again, Trump has followed through on his promise, making it clear that he is serious about rebalancing the U.S. trade position with the world. While some negotiation may still occur, the primary objective is to achieve a more balanced trade environment. A weaker U.S. dollar is likely to be an integral part of this solution.

Yet, as the flow of physical goods to the U.S. declines, the natural question arises: where will these goods go? The EU may be forced to raise tariffs on China, mirroring U.S. actions to protect its industries from an influx of discounted Chinese goods.

Initially, we will observe the effects in soft economic data, such as sentiment indices reflecting investor, industry, and consumer confidence, followed by drops in equity markets and, very likely, declining oil prices. This will eventually be followed by more tangible data showing reductions in employment, spending, investments, and overall economic activity.

Ref oil prices moving forward, we have recently adjusted our Brent crude price forecast. The widespread imposition of strict tariffs is expected to foster fears of an economic slowdown, potentially reducing oil demand. Macroeconomic uncertainty, particularly regarding tariffs, warrants caution regarding the pace of demand growth. Our updated forecast of USD 70 per barrel for 2025 and 2026, and USD 75 per barrel for 2027, reflects a more conservative outlook, influenced by stronger-than-expected U.S. supply, a more politically influenced OPEC+, and an increased focus on fragile demand.

___

US DOE data:

Last week, U.S. crude oil refinery inputs averaged 15.6 million barrels per day, a decrease of 192 thousand barrels per day from the previous week. Refineries operated at 86.0% of their total operable capacity during this period. Gasoline production increased slightly, averaging 9.3 million barrels per day, while distillate (diesel) production also rose, averaging 4.7 million barrels per day.

U.S. crude oil imports averaged 6.5 million barrels per day, up by 271 thousand barrels per day from the prior week. Over the past four weeks, imports averaged 5.9 million barrels per day, reflecting a 6.3% year-on-year decline compared to the same period last year.

The focus remains on U.S. crude and product inventories, which continue to impact short-term price dynamics in both WTI and Brent crude. Total commercial petroleum inventories (excl. SPR) increased by 5.4 million barrels, a modest build, yet insufficient to trigger significant price movements.

Commercial crude oil inventories (excl. SPR) rose by 6.2 million barrels, in line with the 6-million-barrel build forecasted by the API. With this latest increase, U.S. crude oil inventories now stand at 439.8 million barrels, which is 4% below the five-year average for this time of year.

Gasoline inventories decreased by 1.6 million barrels, exactly matching the API’s reported decline of 1.6 million barrels. Diesel inventories rose by 0.3 million barrels, which is close to the API’s forecast of an 11-thousand-barrel decrease. Diesel inventories are currently 6% below the five-year average.

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Over the past four weeks, total products supplied, a proxy for U.S. demand, averaged 20.1 million barrels per day, a 1.2% decrease compared to the same period last year. Gasoline supplied averaged 8.8 million barrels per day, down 1.9% year-on-year. Diesel supplied averaged 3.8 million barrels per day, marking a 3.7% increase from the same period last year. Jet fuel demand also showed strength, rising 4.2% over the same four-week period.

USD DOE invetories
US crude inventories
Fortsätt läsa

Centaur

Guldcentralen

Fokus

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Populära