Följ oss

Analys

Brent crude in non-USD as expensive as in 2011 to 2014

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

SEB - Prognoser på råvaror - CommodityIn order to reach a consensus and keep the OPEC+ group united the latest proposal on the table for the upcoming meeting of OPEC+ on Friday and Saturday in Vienna is a modest increase of 300 to 600 k bl/d in 2H1. The proposal before the weekend by Saudi Arabia and Russia was an increase of 1.5 m bl/d. What is most imperative in our view is that the group is adaptive to market conditions going forward. Uncertainties on both the supply side and the demand side are significant. In the eyes of emerging markets (but also Norway) the oil price in local currency is today as high as it was when Brent traded at $110/bl from 2011 to 2014 with demand destruction naturally setting in at such a cost level. Rapidly escalating US – China trade tension is adding to global growth headwinds. With large uncertainties on the supply side the group should stay ready to increase production in order to avoid escalating pain for the consumers.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities at SEB

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities

It turns out that Donald Trump’s tweets over the past months that “OPEC is at it again creating artificially high prices” are not just a whim. It is actually one of his core views going back more than 30 years. US lawmakers have tried to pass the NOPEC bill (“Non Oil Producing and Exporting Cartels Act”) for years. It will allow the US Government to sue OPEC for oil market manipulation. Earlier attempts to pass the bill have been blocked by President vetoes. Donald is however one of the big supporters of the bill. This bill is now rolling towards OPEC+ and the group certainly do not want to stir the pot by holding back to much oil creating too high prices.

Price action – Rebounding 2.6% ydy as OPEC+ seen to aim for modest compromise. Sinking back on trade war today

Following Friday’s 3.3% sharp sell-off on the back of Saudi Arabia’s comment that an increase in production is “inevitable” the Brent price yesterday rebounded 2.6% to $75.34/bl as the group was seen to aim for a modest compromise. An increase of 1.5 m bl/d has earlier been seen as the proposal by Russia and Saudi Arabia while the latest proposal said to be discussed is an output hike of 300 to 600 k bl/d. This helped the Brent price to rebound yesterday. This morning Brent is pulling back 0.6% to $74.9/bl following the queue of the sharp sell-off in Asian equities on fear that Donald Trump will add tariffs on an additional $200 billion worth of Chinese goods exported to the US.

Aiming for a compromise but adaption to market conditions will be key

In order to hold the OPEC+ group together and appease Iran, Iraq and Venezuela who have strongly opposed any increase in production the group now seems to aim for a compromise of a modest increase of 300 to 600 k bl/d at the upcoming meeting on Friday and Saturday this week. It has all the time been argued that any revival in production will be gradual and adapted to market conditions. To be reactive and adaptive to market conditions seems to be even more important now due to significant uncertainties for both supply and demand.

The global economy ex the US has been cooling since the start of the year and the US – China trade tension is escalating rapidly with an additional $200 billion worth of exports to the US at risk of getting tariffs. This is not good for global growth and for oil demand growth. The strengthening of the USD, especially versus emerging markets is bad both for global growth and for oil demand growth. An oil price of $75/bl seems fairly modest, neither too hot nor too cold. However, if we measure it in local currencies like the Norwegian krone the oil price now is just as high as it was during the period 2011 to 2014 when Brent crude was trading at around $110/bl. The same goes if we take JPM’s EM currency index and adjust Brent crude prices from July 2010. So in the eyes of the emerging market consumers the oil price today is just as expensive as it was during the 2011 to 2014 period. That means that demand destruction is naturally setting in at these prices for the EM’s. And, since EM’s holds the lion’s share of the world’s oil demand growth this is probably not insignificant. It is thus highly important that OPEC+ is sensitive, adaptive and reactive to oil demand conditions going forward.

The supply side is of course just as challenging to gauge as production in Venezuela is declining rapidly but could as well disrupt entirely and unpredictably. US sanctions towards Iran, a sharp decline in Nigeria’s production in June and increasing violence in Libya where the destruction of two of five crude storage tanks at Ras Lanuf“ may take years” to rebuild are all contributing to a highly unpredictable supply.

For a large share of the world’s consumers the oil price is already as high as it was during 2011 to 2014 and OPEC+ does definitely not want to risk that the oil price moves yet higher as the world economy is already facing challenges. Thus adaptivity to market conditions must be the most imperative goal of OPEC+ at the upcoming meeting this week as the goal of getting OECD inventories down to the rolling five year average has been reached. Thus aim for moderate increase in 2H18, but increase more if needed.

Ch1: The oil price for emerging markets is just as high today as it was in 2011 to 2014
Thus demand destruction is naturally setting in at such a price level with weakness in demand as a result

The oil price for emerging markets is just as high today as it was in 2011 to 2014

Ch2: OPEC+ produced 2 m bl/d less in May than it did in October 2016

On average since the start of 2017 the group has delivered net cuts of 1.5 m bl/d and slightly less than the pledged 1.7 m bl/d

OPEC+ produced 2 m bl/d less in May than it did in October 2016

Ch3: But deliberate cuts were only 1.55 m bl/d while involuntary cuts amounted to 1.3 m bl/d

But deliberate cuts were only 1.55 m bl/d while involuntary cuts amounted to 1.3 m bl/d

Analys

June OPEC+ quota: Another triple increase or sticking to plan with +137 kb/d increase?

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Rebounding from the sub-60-line for a second time. Following a low of USD 59.3/b, the Brent July contract rebounded and closed up 1.8% at USD 62.13/b. This was the second test of the 60-line with the previous on 9 April when it traded to a low of USD 58.4/b. But yet again it defied a close below the 60-line. US ISM Manufacturing fell to 48.7 in April from 49 in March. It was still better than the feared 47.9 consensus. Other oil supportive elements for oil yesterday were signs that there are movements towards tariff negotiations between the US and China, US crude oil production in February was down 279 kb/d versus December and that production by OPEC+ was down 200 kb/d in April rather than up as expected by the market and planned by the group.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

All eyes on OPEC+ when they meet on Monday 5 May. What will they decide to do in June? Production declined by 200 kb/d in April (to 27.24 mb/d) rather than rising as the group had signaled and the market had expected. Half of it was Venezuela where Chevron reduced activity due to US sanctions. Report by Bloomberg here. Saudi Arabia added only 20 kb/d in April. The plan is for the group to lift production by 411 kb/d in May which is close to 3 times the monthly planned increases. But the actual increase will be much smaller if the previous quota offenders, Kazakhstan, Iraq and UAE restrain their production to compensate for previous offences.

The limited production increase from Saudi Arabia is confusing as it gives a flavor that the country deliberately aimed to support the price rather than to revive the planned supply. Recent statements from Saudi officials that the country is ready and able to sustain lower prices for an extended period instead is a message that reviving supply has priority versus the price.

OPEC+ will meet on Monday 5 May to decide what to do with production in June. The general expectation is that the group will lift quotas according to plans with 137 kb/d. But recent developments add a lot of uncertainty to what they will decide. Another triple quota increase as in May or none at all. Most likely they will stick to the original plan and decide lift by 137 kb/d in June.

US production surprised on the downside in February. Are prices starting to bite? US crude oil production fell sharply in January, but that is often quite normal due to winter hampering production. What was more surprising was that production only revived by 29 kb/d from January to February. Weekly data which are much more unreliable and approximate have indicated that production rebounded to 13.44 mb/d after the dip in January. The official February production of 13.159 mb/d is only 165 kb/d higher than the previous peak from November/December 2019. The US oil drilling rig count has however not change much since July last year and has been steady around 480 rigs in operation. Our bet is that the weaker than expected US production in February is mostly linked to weather and that it will converge to the weekly data in March and April.

Where is the new US shale oil price pain point? At USD 50/b or USD 65/b? The WTI price is now at USD 59.2/b and the average 13 to 24 mth forward WTI price has averaged USD 61.1/b over the past 30 days. The US oil industry has said that the average cost break even in US shale oil has increased from previous USD 50/b to now USD 65/b with that there is no free cashflow today for reinvestments if the WTI oil price is USD 50/b. Estimates from BNEF are however that the cost-break-even for US shale oil is from USD 40/b to US 60/b with a volume weighted average of around USD 50/b. The proof will be in the pudding. I.e. we will just have to wait and see where the new US shale oil ”price pain point” really is. At what price will we start to see US shale oil rig count starting to decline. We have not seen any decline yet. But if the WTI price stays sub-60, we should start to see a decline in the US rig count.

US crude oil production. Monthly and weekly production in kb/d.

US crude oil production. Monthly and weekly production in kb/d.
Source: SEB graph and highlights, Bloomberg data feed.
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Unusual strong bearish market conviction but OPEC+ market strategy is always a wildcard

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent crude falls with strong conviction that trade war will hurt demand for oil. Brent crude sold off 2.4% yesterday to USD 64.25/b along with rising concerns that the US trade war with China will soon start to visibly hurt oil demand or that it has already started to happen. Tariffs between the two are currently at 145% and 125% in the US and China respectively which implies a sharp decline in trade between the two if at all. This morning Brent crude (June contract) is trading down another 1.2% to USD 63.3/b. The June contract is rolling off today and a big question is how that will leave the shape of the Brent crude forward curve. Will the front-end backwardation in the curve evaporate further or will the July contract, now at USD 62.35/b, move up to where the June contract is today?

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

The unusual ”weird smile” of Brent forward curve implies unusual strong bearish conviction amid current prompt tightness. the The Brent crude oil forward curve has displayed a very unusual shape lately with front-end backwardation combined with deferred contango. Market pricing tightness today but weakness tomorrow. We have commented on this several times lately and Morgan Stanly highlighted how unusual historically this shape is. The reason why it is unusual is probably because markets in general have a hard time pricing a future which is very different from the present. Bearishness in the oil market when it is shifting from tight to soft balance usually comes creeping in at the front-end of the curve. A slight contango at the front-end in combination with an overall backwardated curve. Then this slight contango widens and in the end the whole curve flips to full contango. The current shape of the forward curve implies a very, very strong conviction by the market that softness and surplus is coming. A conviction so strong that it overrules the present tightness. This conviction flows from the fundamental understanding that ongoing trade war is bad for the global economy, for oil demand and for the oil price.

Will OPEC+ switch to cuts or will it leave balancing to a lower price driving US production lower? Add of course also in that OPEC+ has signaled that it will lift production more rapidly and is currently no longer in the mode of holding back to keep Brent at USD 75/b due to an internal quarrel over quotas. That stand can of course change from one day to the next. That is a very clear risk to the upside and oil consumers around should keep that in the back of their minds that this could happen. Though we are not utterly convinced of the imminent risk of this. Before such a pivot happens, Iraq and Kazakhstan probably have to prove that they can live up to their promised cuts. And that will take a few months. Also, OPEC+ might also like to see where the pain-point for US shale oil producers’ price-vise really is today. So far, we have seen no decline in the number of US oil drilling rigs in operation which have steadily been running at around 480 rigs.

With a surplus oil market on the horizon, OPEC+ will have to make a choice. How shale this coming surplus be resolved? Shall OPEC+ cut in order to balance the market or shall lower oil prices drive pain and lower production in the US which then will result in a balanced market? Maybe it is the first or maybe the latter. The group currently has a bloated surplus balance which it needs to slim down at some point. And maybe now is the time. Allowing the oil price to slide. Economic pain for US shale oil producers to rise and US oil production to fall in order to balance the market and make room OPEC+ to redeploy its previous cuts back into the market.

Surplus is not yet here. US oil inventories likely fell close to 2 mb last week. US API yesterday released indications that US crude and product inventories fell 1.8 mb last week with crude up 3.8 mb, gasoline down 3.1 mb and distillates down 2.5 mb. So, in terms of a crude oil contango market (= surplus and rising inventories) we have not yet moved to the point where US inventories are showing that the global oil market now indeed is in surplus. Though Chinese purchases to build stocks may have helped to keep the market tight. Indications that Saudi Arabia may lift June Official Selling Prices is a signal that the oil market may not be all that close to unraveling in surplus.

The low point of the Brent crude oil curve is shifting closer to present. A sign that the current front-end backwardation of the Brent crude oil curve is about to evaporate.

The low point of the Brent crude oil curve is shifting closer to present.
Source: Bloomberg graph and data, SEB highlights

Brent crude versus US Russel 2000 equity index. Is the equity market too optimistic or the oil market too bearish?

Brent crude versus US Russel 2000 equity index. Is the equity market too optimistic or the oil market too bearish?
Source: Bloomberg graph and data, SEB highlights

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Oil demand at risk as US consumers soon will face hard tariff-realities

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Muted sideways trading. Brent crude traded mostly sideways last week, but due to a relatively strong close on the Friday before, it ended the week down 1.6% at USD 66.87/b with a high-low range of USD 65.29 – 68.65/b. So muted price range action. Brent crude is trading marginally higher, up 0.3%, this morning amid mixed equity and commodity markets.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Strong Chinese buying in April as oil prices dipped. Chinese imports of crude continued to accelerate in April following a surge in March with data from Kepler indicating that Chinese imports averaged near 11 mb/d in April. That is an 18mth high and strongly up versus only 8.9 mb/d in January (FT.com today). That has most certainly helped to stem the rot in the oil price which bottomed at an intraday low of USD 58.4/b on 9 April. It has probably also helped to keep the front-end of the Brent crude oil forward curve in consistent backwardation. The strong buying from China is both opportunistic stockpiling due to the price slump but also rebuilding of oil inventories in general.

Oil speculators are cautious with oil demand at risk as US consumers soon will face hard tariff-realities. But oil market speculators are far from bullish. While net long speculative positions are up 52.2 mb over the week to last Tuesday, it is still only the 15th lowest speculative positioning over the past 52 weeks. The underlying concern is of course the US tariffs which is crippling exports of goods from China to the US with bookings of container freight down by 30% according to Hapag-Lloyd. Bloomberg’s Chief US economist, Anna Wong, is saying that empty shelves in US shops will soon be the reality. Thus US-China trade relations need to be fixed quickly to avoid hard realities for US consumers. The lead-times are long and the current tariffs and uncertainty around these is now risking availability for US consumer goods for the holiday seasons in H2-25. Tariff realities for US consumers are increasingly just around the corner.  ”Rubber will hit the road” very soon and that is when we might see weaker oil demand as well.

Brent crude traded mostly sideways last week though ended down 1.6% in the end.

Brent crude traded mostly sideways last week though ended down 1.6% in the end.
Source: Bloomberg graph and data

Net long speculative positions in Brent and WTI up 52.2 mb over week to last Tuesday but still at 15-week low over past 52 weeks.

Net long speculative positions in Brent and WTI up 52.2 mb over week to last Tuesday but still at 15-week low over past 52 weeks.
Source: SEB graph and calculations, Bloomberg data
Fortsätt läsa

Centaur

Guldcentralen

Fokus

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Populära