Analys
A two currency oil market
China today launched its long awaited yuan denominated oil contract at the International Energy Exchange (INE) in Shanghai. Seven crude streams from UAE, Qatar, Oman, Yemen Iraq and China will define the pricing of the contract. There is substantial scepticism towards the contract. Most of the sceptical arguments will in our view dissipate over time as rules, regulations and capital controls are adapted and adjusted as time goes by. The Chinese government likely has plenty of leverage to make the contract a success making it into an Asian oil benchmark representing a vibrant and growing oil demand which today accounts for 27% of global demand.
The launch of the contract will open up for international participation in China’s commodity market for the first time. International oil players will need to hold renminbi books reflecting an oil market which here onwards will roll on two currency wheels.
The rapidly rising risk that Donald, Mike and John will tear up the current Iranian nuclear deal in mid-May makes it likely that Iran will accept crude oil settlement in renminbi in not too long in order to avert the risk of renewed dollar sanctions which it experienced so painfully from 2012 to 2015.
Price action: Brent jumps while equities fall as Venezuela and Iran supply risk increases on John Bolton
The front month Brent crude oil contract jumped 2.2% on Friday to $70.45/bl on news that John Bolton was replacing Lt. Gen. H:R: McMaster as the US national security advisor. John Bolton is known to be abrasive, undiplomatic, deeply conservative and nationalistic with hawkish views on Iran and North Korea. As such he matches both Donald Trump and his new secretary of state Mike Pompeo. It is now difficult to see how the Iran Nuclear deal can survive beyond mid-May when a new round of US waivers is needed to carry the deal forward yet another quarter, unless of course the deal is significantly re-worked. Apparently however the non-US signatories to the Iran nuclear deal are still in the dark with respect to what and how Donald Trump want’s the deal to be re-written. The May waiver deadline is approaching rapidly and as far as we know there is no real work in progress in order to re-work the deal. The appointment of John Bolton also increases the risk for sanctions towards Venezuela. Venezuela’s oil production and export is already in free fall but hanging on a thread by US refineries who are supplying Venezuela with naphtha in exchange of heavy crude oil. Venezuela would not be able to export much oil without the naphtha or light crude which is critical for diluting its heavy crude to a quality which is exportable. Thus US oil sanctions towards Venezuela would cut the last thread.
A two currency oil market
After years and years of waiting the Chinese Yuan denominated oil contract quoted at the Shanghai International Energy Exchange (INE) is finally here. China did try to launch an oil futures contract back in 1993 but it basically blew up due to uncontrollable price volatility. This time around China has taken good time to prepare the launch of its new oil contract in order to make sure that there is no second round flop like in 1993. China last year became the world’s top oil importer with an average import of 8.4 m bl/d. At the same time it is also the world’s sixth biggest oil producer with an average production last year of 3.8 m bl/d.
Seven crude streams in the INE contract with characteristics close to the Dubai crude slate
Seven deliverable crude streams in Shanghai will be used to settle the INE crude oil contract. They originate from UAE, Oman, Qatar, Yemen and China itself. The crude streams are distinctly different from the light, sweet crude benchmarks of Brent crude and WTI. The INE crude streams are on average (across the different grades) required to have an API gravity of more than 29.6 and a sulphur content of less than 2%. In comparison the WTI benchmark is very light with an API of 39.6 and only about 0.24% sulphur. As such the INE benchmark is distinctly different from both Brent crude and WTI. It is however very close to the Dubai crude oil marker which has an API of 31 and a sulphur content of 2%. As such one could say that the INE contract is the Dubai marker in Asia quoted in renminbi.
The new INE contract could be a representation of 27 m bl/d of vibrant Asian oil demand
The new Chinese oil contract will likely over time come to represent Asian oil demand in general. In 2018 Asian demand is set to average 27 m bl/d (IEA) or 27% of global consumption. It has been argued that the new benchmark will be a bad price hedge for oil deliveries in other places in Asia than Shanghai. This is based on the assumption that the oil price fundamentally is set either in the US (WTI), in the Gulf (Dubai marker) or in Europe (Brent). And as such it should mathematically be better to hedge with one of these three price points rather than the new Chinese INE contract. However, if the driver of the global oil market and thus oil price dynamics is instead really set by the vibrant oil demand in Asia rather than the three mentioned oil price benchmarks then it would clearly be better to hedge with the INE contract.
In our view the new INE contract is not an effort to replace the existing global crude oil benchmarks. It is instead filling a needed vacuum in the global oil market: A marker for the Asian market. It has been argued that the existing crude benchmarks are successful since they are located at hubs with both large production and consumption. But this is also actually true for the new benchmark with China being the sixth largest oil producer in the world as well as the biggest oil importer in the world.
The INE contract has several disadvantages but these are likely to dissipate over time
To start with the INE contract seems to have several disadvantages. It will have limited trading hours with the last trading slot ending at 0700 am GMT and thus just before the London market opens. The Chinese government has also set crude oil storage costs at twice the global average level in order to avoid excessive price volatility due from potential games between the physical market and the new INE contract. Such high storage costs will be negative for the necessary interplay and price discovery between the local physical market (derived from storage economics) and the INE financial instruments. Another reason for the very high storage cost may be to avoid commodity storage games used for shadow financing and circumvention of capital controls which has flourished for other commodities traded in China. The quotation of the INE contract in renminbi will also be a negative as seen by most current oil market participants in the current dollar dominated oil market. And lastly Chinese capital controls and unpredictable regulations will also be a concern for many potential participants.
Many of these negatives will however dissipate over time. Trading hours will expand, storage costs will normalize, general capital controls will ease and rules and regulations will stabilize. And lastly the renminbi will be more and more accepted currency world-wide. The Chinese government does have time to adjust and the current mode of the INE market is launch phase with some trail and error. The front month INE contract is actually the September 2018 contract allowing plenty of time for adjustment. So we do not think that one should judge the contract in the early phase on the many negative traits which have been highlighted.
Plenty of participants ready to transact – Open interest will be the measure of success
More than 6,000 trading accounts have been opened for the INE contract including China’s largest oil companies and 150 brokerage firms. Larger foreign financial institutions like J.P.Morgan have also opened accounts. To further attract foreign participants the Chinese Government has waived income taxes for foreign investors for the first three years. An addition attraction of the INE oil contract is that it will be the first time foreigners will be able to trade commodities in China.
We agree that over time it will be the size of the number of open contracts and not turnover per se which will be the sign of success for the contract. So the open interest in the INE contract will be the parameter to watch. It will be the fingerprint showing that the INE contract fills a need and is actively used as a hedging tool.
The Chinese government has power to tilt the market towards the new contract
The Chinese government has a lot of power in order to ensure that the INE contract becomes a success with widespread use. The easy way is of course to demand that all domestic crude oil purchasing is done with settlement versus the INE contract benchmark. In that way any oil producer who would like to sell oil to China would have to accept the INE contract and settlement in renminbi. China could of course also lean on the countries who cooperate with China on the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) with six major infrastructure projects in overdrive this year. Asking the involved countries in these BRI projects to use or support the new INE oil contract could be a natural request.
We think that the launch of the INE contract in China is a natural development reflecting that China is the world’s top oil importer, the sixth largest oil producer and a natural benchmark for oil prices in Asia. However, essentially what it all boils down to is that China wants to be able to purchase its oil in renminbi. There are several countries already on-board: Russia, Venezuela, Nigeria and Angola are all already selling oil to China in renminbi. We assume that UAE, Oman, Qatar, Yemen and Iraq also are accepting renminbi as payment for crude delivered to China since six of the seven crude streams in the INE contract originates from them.
No Iranian crude slates in the INE contract yet but Iran should be a natural participant
It is surprising to see that there are no crude oil streams from Iran in the new INE contract. The Iran Heavy crude stream with API = 30.2 and Sulphur = 1.8% should be a natural match the INE crude slate profile.
Iran is one of the countries which have been heavily hit by the weaponized USD. In 2012 the US applied pressure through the SWIFT system. It blocked clearing for every Iranian bank, froze $100 billion of Iranian assets which together with other measures helped to block Iranian oil exports which roughly dropped 1 m bl/d due to this.
US pressure is building up against the Iran nuclear deal – should naturally drive Iran towards the INE contract
Now pressure is rising rapidly towards Iran. In the US forces are gathering to tear apart the Iran nuclear deal with the recent appointment of Mike Pompeo as US secretary of state and John Bolton as the US national security advisor. Donald Trump together with these two now looks ready to tear apart the current Iran nuclear deal as waivers are up for renewal in mid-May. The Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman also seemed to apply pressure against Iran at his meeting with Donald Trump. Thus Saudi Arabia seems like it is sticking with the US while Iran, Iraq, Oman, UAE, Qatar and Yemen are drifting over towards China. China and the US are at the same time drifting apart amid increasing trade tensions with political tensions in the South China Sea being the icing on the cake so to speak. It seems highly plausible in our view that Iran in not too long with explicitly state that they also accept payment in renminbi for oil sales to China.
Saudi Arabia however seems for the time being to stick even tighter to the dollar-oil deal which the House of Saud presumably struck with Nixon and Kissinger back in 1974 in exchange for protection and geopolitical support.
Crude slates in the INE contract
Ch1: Yes, the INE September contract started to trade first time on 26 March 2018
Ch2: Brent crude went opposite of equities last week
Ch3: Weekly US, EU, Singapore and Floating stocks lower 2nd week
Analys
The price of crude oil in Europe today is $140/b
Last week’s oil price action distorted by rolling of the November contract last week. The December Brent crude oil contract rose $4.8/b, or 5% last week. Much of that gain was due to the roll-yield as the November contract rolled off as the M1 contract to be replaced by the Dec-26 contract. The backwardation between the Nov and the Dec contract averaged $6.5/b over the last three days before 1 October and the rolling of contract. The ”gain” over the week was thus not much of a gain at all. If we just look at the M1 contract it instead fell 2% Friday to Friday though that disguises the change in the underlying contract over the week. The Brent M1 contract closed the week at $102.25/b. The announcement of 100 mb of oil from G7 SPR helped to ease prices at the end of last week. Though that effect seems to have faded today.

More barrels from Strategic Petroleum Reserves or really barrels which were supposed to be released previously? Nonetheless, Trump seems to be content and is backing down from diesel export ban. Trump threatened the world, but especially Europe with a US diesel export ban unless Europe agreed to release diesel from strategic reserves. G7 last week decided to release 100 million barrels of oil from strategic reserves. But here the obscurity starts. How much of that will be diesel? ”Substantial release of diesel within 20 days” was the statement. If it happens late in this 20 day period, it would bring us very close to the US midterm elections which of course is what Trump is worried about here. IEA members promised to release 425 mb of oil from strategic reserves of which 125 mb was to be oil products. But a significant portion of that was never really released. The question is thus whether these ”new” 100 mb release will really be new or if the lion’s share of the ”new” 100 mb is really just part of the old 425 not yet fully released. Well, it looks like the promise, irrespectively what it really is, has averted a US diesel export ban for now. And it did also help to ease prices a bit at the end of last week. An effect which looks like it has mostly faded this Monday.
$140/b is the price of crude oil in Europe today. Back to the complete distortion of oil and product prices in time and geography. The Dated Brent ”spot” price averaged $123.3/b last week. But that is really the average Day_10 to Day_20 of the ”daily Dated Brent” forward curve. But since this curve is in very steep backwardation, the real prices for physical oil cargoes at the very front-end of this daily curve sits well above the average of this daily curve. The physical premiums for Oseberg and for Fortis crude takes this steep backwardation into account. The full price average for Oseberg and Fortis last week were thus $142.5/b and $140.2/b. That is way, way higher than both the Dated Brent ”spot” price last week and the average of the Brent futures price, the M1 contract, which averaged $103.2/b last week and is trading at $102.4/b
Extreme prompt tightness may fade or get much worse. The extreme prompt tightness and backwardation we see in the market today is a display of today’s prompt situation and not necessarily a guide for the future. The much more relaxed Brent M1 contract (today December) at $102.4/b is maybe a reflection of an oil market either betting or expecting that today’s problems will be resolved somehow over the coming three months. Or, that the current flow of oil out of the SoH at 17.5 mb/d (close to normal) will be sustained or even increase over time. But we don’t know exactly why the flow of crude, products and LNG out of the SoH has been able to sustain at around 17.5 mb/d since mid-September (it seems). Is it because shippers are better at managing the risk or more willing to take the risk of transiting? Is it because the US military assistance is better? Or is it because Iran is paid by exporters and is allowing exports out through the SoH? It seems plausible that Iran expects the US to attack again after the US midterm elections. If so, then Iran may engage with fresh attacks before that date. Physical crude in Europe today is $140/b, or 2x the ”normal” price of $70/b. But if tightness escalates further, then price of crude in Europe could go to 3x, 4x or even 5x the normal level. Let’s hope that the US is able to keep the SoH ”open” at a rate of 17.5 mb/d and that another 100 mb of oil from G7 helps to shield against that upside risk.
The global oil-stock cushion is getting ”scarily thin”. Looking at the Brent M1 Dec-26 contract, one gets the impression that risks may be fairly contained. Looking at physical spot prices in Europe however of around $140/b, the sense of stress rises substantially. The latter better reflects Amin Nasser, CEO of Saudi Aramco, when he recently said that the cushion capacity of global oil stocks are getting ”scarily thin”.
Some key questions helping to keep the Brent M1 price above $100/b: Will Iran initiate fresh attacks before the US midterm elections? Will the US attack Iran after the elections? Will the US be able to keep the SoH close to open at 17.5 mb/d? Will the Houthis re-attack the Saudi east-west pipeline and ships trying to traverse the Bab-el Mandeb Strait as the Saudi-backed Yemen government tries to retake areas along the Red Sea recently taken by the Houthis? How far will this have to go before China finally decides to step in as a peacemaker in ME negotiations?
ARA Crude oil, diesel and nat gas prices in USD/boe

Physical crude oil premiums for Fortis and Oseberg in the NSea in USD/b premium over the Dated Brent index

Analys
Oil prices are rising, but a picture of the future ME order may start to emerge
Spot crude oil prices at very high levels. The Brent 1M (November) contract yesterday traded between $103.76 – 108.83/b before settling the day at $105.28/b. This morning it is trading up 1.4% to $106.8/b. That is not much of a price given that the ME crisis has been ongoing since 28 February. The Dated Brent spot price however settled yesterday at $123.78/b and averaged $120.6/b last week. Even stronger were the individual North Sea spot crude prices where Johan Sverdrup crude averaged $144/b from 21 to 24 September. And Johan Castberg was said to have traded at a premium of $32/b to the Dated Brent price last week which potentially would have placed it closer to $150/b.

A steady trend higher since $70/b in early July. Crude oil prices have been on a steady trend upwards since they bottomed out at around $70/b in early July following the discharge of some 200 million barrels of crude, products and liquids from the Persian Gulf during a two week MoU window. from 20 June to 7 July when hostilities again resumed.
The oil market today is split apart in time, space and molecules. Financial crude oil prices for November delivery are trading at $106/b (Brent) and $93.3/b (US WTI) and $107/b (Oman). But spot crude oil prices are much higher at $120-150/b as described above. But consumers do not consume crude oil, they consume diesel and gasoline and other products. And diesel prices are closer to $200/b in ARA due to destruction of Russian refineries and locked-in refineries in the Persian Gulf. Oil markets are very stressed with respect to products, but not so stressed with respect to crude oil. But refineries are eager to pay up for crude deliveries right here and now so they can convert that crude to products and make a killing profit. They are not willing to pay up for November crude deliveries in the same way as uncertainties on the Middle East situation is so high. Exorbitantly expensive VLCC freight rates is also driving prices apart. VLCC freight rates are today running at 500,000 to 1,000,000 dollar a day rather than the normal 20,000 a day. This typically adds $10-20/b for crude oil between the point of origin and the point of delivery some 30-50 days out in time when the crude is delivered. This creates a lot of confusion of what really is the price of crude oil these days. Prices are very different in time and space.
Bonds and equity markets are starting to feel the heat. The Middle East crisis is starting to feed risk and pain into financial markets where the US 10-year rate is rising along with crude and product prices with equity market indices starting to pull back in response.
The risk is rising that the ”Trump war” in the Middle East may lead to the ”Trump recession”. A legacy Trump would not likely want to have. Feed-through to financial markets, rising risks for US financial and economic recession, rising risk to Trump’s legacy, declining US stocks of Patriot and THAAD rockets could be forcing mechanisms towards a resolution of the Middle East crisis.
A picture of the future Middle East order is starting to emerge. There seems to be a lot of discussions between different parties going on and a picture of a new Middle East order is starting to emerge. A post Middle East pax Americana order. Where the different countries in the Middle East are taking much more responsibility for the security order in the region. The US provides intelligence and sell weapons to the region but is reducing its military presence. Iran is recognized as a regional power, but not the dominant one and is part of the security order in some ways. Trump can say that he reshaped the Middle East order. Exports of oil restored. The region now paying for its own defense. US soldiers pulled out to a minimum. China part of the diplomatic solution and taking some responsibility for keeping Iran in check.
Time to some kind of ME resolution? Forcing mechanisms: Declining stocks of defensive US rockets + rising crude and product prices + rising economic and financial pain and rising risk to Trump’s legacy. A window of resolution could be November to January maybe. Markets will likely increasingly price in a resolution as the picture of the future security order in the Middle East emerges further.
Crude and diesel prices in USD/b

European M1 refinery margins at record high.

Analys
Dated Brent and Oman crude are showing the way higher
Dated Brent and Oman crude are showing the way higher. The Brent crude M1 contract (October) gained another 0.75% yesterday. It traded in a range of $95.97-95.06/b and closed at $97.0/b. This morning it gains another 1.4% to $98.4/b. The Dubai M1 contract which is settled in November is showing the way at $105/b while Dated Brent settled ydy at $106.8/b. Brent crude M1 is now well above both the 50dma, 100dma and 200dma and is heading towards the 61.8% Fibo level of $100.55/b with $110.44/b next in line technical level thereafter.

Tight oil product markets are helping to drive crude oil prices higher as well. The strong push upwards for the Dated Brent price with ydy price reaching $106.8/b. Behind that drive upwards it very tight oil product markets with balance of month diesel refining margins in ARA now close to $90/b and gasoil cracks have been reported to top $100/b for the first time ever. That means extreme profitability for refineries. In response refineries here, there and everywhere want to get their hands on physical crude as quickly as possible. Convert it to oil products and sell the products into the ultra-tight spot oil product markets. Especially the diesel segment (Jet, diesel, gasoil). The economic incentive is huge for refineries.
This drive by refineries to process more crude in response to high refining margins, usually kicks in at much lower levels. Thereby normally transferring tightness from the oil product market over to the crude oil market. That normal mechanism hasn’t really worked properly in this crisis so far since there hasn’t been all that much spare refining capacity left as Ukraine is constantly damaging Russian refineries while the semi-closure of the SoH has sharply reduced oil product exports.
Stronger Chinese crude oil imports but higher oil product exports as well. Chines crude imports rose 6.2% MoM in August to 9.21 mb/d. That was still 2.9 mb/d below the 2025 average of 12.1 mb/d. But China’s net oil product exports rose to 0.91 mb/d in August which is the highest level since February 2023. As a result, Chinese imports of crude and oil products was still 3.5 mb/d below the 2025 average versus 3.6 mb/d in July. That is a strengthening of net imports of only 0.1 mb/d. Not much change in total. But it shows that Chinese refineries, probably with the blessing of government, are importing more crude and re-export these as oil products. That helps to transfer oil product tightness to crude oil tightness. India is doing the same. In July it exported about 1.4 mb/d of oil products and the highest since September.
The Iran-Oman deal on the SoH will give China a forceful political option. The Iran-Oman agreement over how to operate the SoH is just days away from finalization says Iran. The IMO and the US is said to have been involved in the process. Once it is agreed and published, China will have the option to sail a Chinese flagged VLCC through the SoH according to the new, official regulation of the SoH, load oil at Kharg Island and take it back to China. That is a very forceful option for China.
Oil and the SoH will for sure be a hot topic when Trump and Xi Jinping meets in the US on 25 September. And China will have some forceful bargaining chips to play versus Donald Trump regarding the SoH and oil.
ARA balance of month refining margins at close to $90/b giving refineries strong incentives to run hard converting crude to products = stronger refinery crude oil demand

Dated Brent and Oman crude (settled outside of the Persian Gulf) are showing the way upwards

Chinese crude (crude) and net crude and oil product imports (red) versus the 2025 average. Net crude and oil product imports was 3.5 mb/d below the 2025 average in August and 3.6 mb/d below in July. Almost the same. Stronger crude imports but also higher oil product exports

Chinese oil product exports rose to 0.91 mb/d in August and highest since Feb 2023. (numbers in reverse)

-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanPriset på diesel når sin högsta nivå någonsin i USA
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanBrentolja med fysisk leverans i närtid kostar nu 120 USD per fat
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanFinska kärnkraftverket Loviisa förlänger livstiden till 2050 med hjälp av Google
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedanÅr 2035 kan datacenter i USA förbruka mer naturgas än Japan och Tyskland tillsammans
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanSvenska gurkor växer flexibelt med tillgången på elektricitet
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedanVarför det en gång så mäktiga OPEC förlorar inflytande
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedanDieselpriset i USA passerade idag upp över 200 USD per fat
-
Analys4 veckor sedanDated Brent and Oman crude are showing the way higher






