Analys
SEB – Råvarukommentarer, 5 november 2012
Sammanfattning av rekommendationer
Råolja – Brent
Vi fortsätter rekommendera köp av Bull Olja och Olja S vid nedgång på Brent kring $105/fat. Vi bedömer det som osannolikt att priset på råolja kommer att rasa lägre än så, såvida inte tillväxtprognoserna skrivs ned väsentligt. Vår uppfattning är att oljepriset kommer att fortsätta vara väl understött med tanke på stora geopolitiska risker, strama marknader för oljeprodukter, höga incitamentpriser för att stimulera till tillräckliga investeringar i ny kapacitet och behovet av att producentländer försvarar priser för att balansera budgetar.
Medan balansen på råoljemarknaden förbättrats något är situationen för mellandestillat fortsatt mer ansträngd. Lagren av mellandestillat är historiskt låga och en kallare än normal vinter kan komma försvåra situation ytterligare. Även under normala omständigheter har raffinaderierna problem att producera tillräckligt med mellandestillat under uppvärmningssäsongen. Det gör förråden till en nyckelfaktor för balanseringen av marknaden. Den långsiktiga strukturella balansen för marknaden för mellandestillat är också oroande eftersom det är där vi ser den enda konsumtionstillväxten i Europa.
Det som dominerat nyhetsflödet i veckan är stormen Sandy, vars framfart lett till stor förödelse, både mänskligt och materiellt. Kostnaden för Sandy beräknas nu vara uppe i 50 mdr dollar. Två tredjedelar av raffinaderierna på den amerikanska östkusten, den största oljeledningen, de flesta större hamnar samt vägar och flygplatser stängdes som en följd av Sandy. Efterfrågan minskade därmed på råolja, vilket pressat priset något. Rörelserna har ändå varit begränsade och råoljepriset ganska stabilt mellan 108 och 110 usd. För oljeprodukter, inte minst bensin, har Sandy istället lett till stora uppgångar, eftersom utbudet minskat då raffinaderikapaciteten minskat och människor hamstrat drivmedel.
Iran som är starkt pressat av sanktionerna mot landet har hittills inte gett efter för trycket från omvärlden men Irans försvarsminister uppges nu ha sagt att man inte har några planer på att stänga den vitala farleden genom Hormuzsundet då ”dessa två frågor (stängning av Hormuzsundet och sanktioner mot landet) är helt oberoende och inte relaterade till varandra”.
Vår rekommendation förblir att köpa BULL OLJA X4 S eller OLJA S om priset faller ned mot 105 dollar. På den nivån ser vi goda möjligheter att tjäna pengar.
Elektricitet
Förra veckan sänkte vi vår ingångsnivå för longa positioner till €39/MWh för Q1-2013-kontraktet på Nord Pool. Motivet var att marginalkostnaden för kolkraftproduktion fortsatt falla. Vi rekommenderar att handla kontraktet från köpsidan under november om denna utgångsnivå uppnås. Å andra sidan är €43/MWh till €44/MWh bra utgångspunkter för de som tar risken att handla vinterkontraktet NELFQ3 från säljsidan med BEAR EL X2 S eller med BEAR EL X4 S.
Situationen sedan förra veckan är i stort oförändrad. Det totala hydrologiska överskottet är 10-13 TWh över normalt samtidigt som kärnkraften har god tillgänglighet. Vi har därför länge argumenterat för att differensen mellan NELF3Q och vårt MCCP-index (.MCC1Q13) varit alltför stor. Nu har så en korrigering skett och differensen minskat en del. Q1-2013-kontraktet (NELF3Q) har, i takt med lägre marginalkostnad för kolkraft och fortsatt nederbördsrikt väder, pressats lägre och är senast omsatt på €40,50/MWh. Kontraktet har ändå lite ytterligare fallhöjd och ska, i rådande miljö, närma sig €39/MWh nivån innan vi tycker att kontraktet är köpvärt.
Ska man sammanfatta elmarknaden, så är det att det stora prisfallet tycks vara över. Marknaden handlar ”sidledes” med 44 euro som övre gräns. Nu har vi sänkt den nedre gränsen till 39 euro från 40 euro. I den här typen av marknaden kan man försöka komma in med BULL EL X2 S nära 39 och försöka sälja nära 44 euro. Vice versa att då försöka köpa BEAR EL X4 S.
Guld och Silver
Ädelmetallerna har det jobbigt i nuvarande miljö. Som noterats de senaste två veckorna är statistiken ”för stark”. Fredagens arbetssiffra med påföljande dollarstyrka satte ordentlig press. Spotguld i London föll kraftigt från $1714 ned till $1678. Den mer volatila systermetallen silver föll procentuellt ungefär dubbelt så mycket. Vi håller oss neutrala på ädelmetaller, men det kan vara värt att börja leta köplägen. Tekniskt sett kan det fortsätta ner de närmsta dagarna, med nästa stora stödnivå för guld kring $1650.
Nedan ser vi kursdiagrammet för guld. Notera stödlinjen på 1630 dollar per uns. Om 1650 inte håller, finns nästa stöd på den nivån.
Nedan ser vi kursdiagrammet för silver i dollar per troy ounce. Vi ser att 35 dollar är ett viktigt motstånd och att 30 dollar är ett viktigt stöd. Vi skrev förra veckan att en fortsatt nedgång till 30 dollar skulle vara ett bra köptillfälle. En stopp-loss-order bör då placeras strax under 30 dollar. Detta gäller fortfarande.
Platina
Platina föll ungefär som guldet, dock något mindre strax under 2 %. Situationen i Sydafrika är lugnare, men problemen kvarstår och gruvorna har svårt med lönsamheten. Det allmänna stämningsläget kring både bas- och ädelmetaller är dock inte det bästa just nu. Vi rekommenderar att man försöker komma in på den långa sidan i platina. Risken är dock påtaglig att priset faller ner till 1500 dollar per uns. Det tror vi i så fall är ett bra pris att köpa på.
Nedan ser vi priset på guld dividerat med priset på platina. Platina har utvecklats bättre än guld. Det är en tendens vi ”borde” se mer av med tanke på att priset på guld stigit så mycket över den historiska relationen till platina och att platinagruvorna har problem med lönsamheten. Vi anser att detta är ett bra argument för att sälja guld och köpa platina, allt annat lika, eller att köpa platina enbart.
Koppar
Det är lite motsägelsefullt just nu. Fokus ligger på USA där det fortsätter att komma in positiv konjunkturdata, något som naturligtvis borde vara positivt för metallerna. Efterfrågan ökar igen. Problemet är bara att de som investerat i råvaror på basis av fortsatta penningpolitiska åtgärder från centralbanken, blir besvikna (sannolikheten minskar för ytterligare stimulanser i takt med att ekonomin återhämtar sig). Positioner som togs i september likvideras. Förra fredagen redovisades amerikansk BNP-tillväxt starkare än väntat för kvartal 3 på 2 %, jämfört med 1,3 % kvartalet före. Oro för stormen under veckans inledning lade sordin på stämningen och vi fick se ett prisfall på mellan 2 och 3 %. Kina stimulerar via marknadsoperationer vilket fick den korta inhemska räntan att falla kraftigt. Metallpriserna återhämtade i princip hela veckans fall och stod i torsdags oförändrade. På fredagen kom nästa ”kalldusch” med starka siffror. Arbetsmarknadsstatistik kom in mycket bättre än väntat, och på samma tema, d.v.s. minskad sannolikhet för ytterligare stimulanser från FED, så rasade priserna igen. Tendensen varierar mellan basmetallerna. Koppar och nickel tog mest stryk, medan zinken går mot strömmen och är faktiskt upp ett par procent i veckan. Aluminium stänger oförändrad.
Koppar
Efter fredagens statistik tappade kopparn 2 % vilket också blir veckans facit. De starkare amerikanska siffrorna stärker dollarn, vilket traditionellt är negativt för dollarnoterade råvaror. Effekten är särskilt tydlig för ädelmetaller, men koppar har svårt att stå emot när dollarrörelsen blir kraftig (EURUSD föll från 1,2930 till 1,2835 under fredagseftermiddagen). LME-lagret har ökat med nästan 10 % de två senaste veckorna. Det ska inte ses som alltför negativt, då det främst är en effekt av terminskurvan, som en tid har varit i s.k. backwardation (terminspriserna är lägre an spot). Detta ”lockar fram” fysisk vara som inte är ämnad för omedelbar konsumtion. Vad som oroar är börslagret i Shanghai, som också ökade under veckan med 1,5 %. Inte så mycket, men det tyder på att Kinas konsumtion inte riktigt vill komma igång. I nuvarande marknadssituation kan det vara värt att avvakta och hålla sig neutral, men vi kvarstår med bedömningen att koppar har en i grunden stark fundamenta med relativt små globala lagernivåer. Minsta tendens till stimulanspaket från Kina så vänder trenden väldigt snabbt. Den tekniska analysen indikerar fortsatt prispress nästa vecka. Vi har $7600 för LME-koppar i sikte som en första ”jämna” stödnivå. Om den nivån bryter får vi inte räkna bort möjligheten för en tillfällig botten ned till $7400.
Som man ser i diagrammet ovan, har mycket handel tidigare skett i ett område kring 7500 dollar. I det området låg handeln mellan maj och början på september. Före det var det ett bottenområde även för perioden september till december. Vi gissar att samma köpintressen som fanns då, nog kommer att finnas kvar även nu i november. Kommer priset ner till 7500 ska man nog anse det vara ett bra köptillfälle. Det man köper då är t ex KOPPAR S.
För spannmål och övriga jordbruksprodukter hänvisas till senaste utgåvan av veckobrevet om jordbruksprodukter.
[box]SEB Veckobrev Veckans råvarukommentar är producerat av SEB Merchant Banking och publiceras i samarbete och med tillstånd på Råvarumarknaden.se[/box]
Disclaimer
The information in this document has been compiled by SEB Merchant Banking, a division within Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) (“SEB”).
Opinions contained in this report represent the bank’s present opinion only and are subject to change without notice. All information contained in this report has been compiled in good faith from sources believed to be reliable. However, no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made with respect to the completeness or accuracy of its contents and the information is not to be relied upon as authoritative. Anyone considering taking actions based upon the content of this document is urged to base his or her investment decisions upon such investigations as he or she deems necessary. This document is being provided as information only, and no specific actions are being solicited as a result of it; to the extent permitted by law, no liability whatsoever is accepted for any direct or consequential loss arising from use of this document or its contents.
About SEB
SEB is a public company incorporated in Stockholm, Sweden, with limited liability. It is a participant at major Nordic and other European Regulated Markets and Multilateral Trading Facilities (as well as some non-European equivalent markets) for trading in financial instruments, such as markets operated by NASDAQ OMX, NYSE Euronext, London Stock Exchange, Deutsche Börse, Swiss Exchanges, Turquoise and Chi-X. SEB is authorized and regulated by Finansinspektionen in Sweden; it is authorized and subject to limited regulation by the Financial Services Authority for the conduct of designated investment business in the UK, and is subject to the provisions of relevant regulators in all other jurisdictions where SEB conducts operations. SEB Merchant Banking. All rights reserved.
Analys
How renewable fuels are accelerating the decarbonisation of transport

On 16 November 2022, UK’s Royal Air Force (RAF) Voyager aircraft, the military variant of the Airbus A330, took to the skies for 90 minutes over Oxfordshire. What looked like a routine test flight in its outward appearance was ultimately deemed ground-breaking. Why? It was a world-first military transporter aircraft flight, and the first of any aircraft type in the UK to be completed using 100% sustainable jet fuel.

What are renewable fuels?
Renewable hydrocarbon biofuels (also called green or drop-in biofuels) are fuels produced from biomass sources through a variety of biological, thermal, and chemical processes. These products are chemically identical to petroleum gasoline, diesel, or jet fuel.
In other words, renewable fuels are sources of energy chemically identical to fossil fuels but produced from domestic, commercial, or agricultural waste (see Figure 1 below).
Figure 1: Converting waste into energy

Why the excitement?
Renewable fuels, like renewable diesel and sustainable jet fuel, can reduce greenhouse gas emissions by around 80-90% compared to fossil fuels. And because they burn much cleaner, engine filters remain cleaner for longer reducing the need for maintenance. Furthermore, given used cooking oil, vegetable oil, processing waste, and animal fat waste are used as inputs, the production of these fuels reduces biowaste, thereby cutting emissions from landfills.
This makes renewable fuels a key component of the circular economy. Humans have largely operated on the linear model historically when it comes to utilising natural resources. The circular model, in contrast, is much less wasteful and seeks to recycle as much as possible (see Figure 2 below).
Figure 2: The Circular Economy

The most exciting thing about renewable fuels is the immediacy with which they can make an impact. The reason why they are referred to as drop-in fuels is that they can replace fossil fuels in internal combustion engines with little or no modification required. So, if supply was abundant enough, forms of transport which cannot be electrified easily like heavy duty trucks, ships, and aeroplanes can be switched across to renewable fuels making a significant improvement to the environmental footprint. According to BP, “A return flight between London and San Francisco has a carbon footprint per economy ticket of nearly 1 tonne of CO2 equivalent. With the aviation industry expected to double to over 8 billion passengers by 2050, it is essential that we act to reduce aviation’s carbon emissions.”
The challenge
Renewable fuels or biofuels are still in their infancy. This means the obvious hurdle to overcome is cost competitiveness with fossil fuels. Cost estimates vary, but figures from the International Air Transport Association (IATA) provide a useful sense for the ballpark. In May 2022, IATA stated that the average worldwide price of jet fuel is about $4.15 per gallon compared to the US average price of a gallon of sustainable aviation fuel, which is about $8.67.
So, roughly double the price of the incumbent polluting technology. This is not a bad starting point at all. Considering how rapidly the cost of energy storage in batteries has fallen in the last decade, renewable fuels could become competitive quite soon if sufficient investment is made and economies of scale are achieved. IATA also predicts that renewable fuels could make up 2% of all aviation fuels by 2025, which could become a tipping point in their competitiveness.
Businesses are acting
Businesses pursuing their own net zero targets have already started exploring renewable fuels to minimise their waste. Darling Ingredients Inc, which produces its trademark Diamond Green Diesel from recycled animal fats, inedible corn oil, and used cooking oil, was chosen by fast food chain Chick-fil-A in March 2022 to turn its used cooking oil into clean transportation fuel.
Similarly, McDonald’s entered into a partnership with Neste Corporation in 2020 to convert its used vegetable oil into renewable diesel and fuel the trucks that make deliveries to its restaurants. According to TortoiseEcofin, both Darling Ingredients and Neste have a net negative carbon footprint given emissions produced by these businesses are lower that the emissions avoided because of their renewable fuels.
A final word
Renewable fuels alone will not tackle climate change. No single solution can. But they can help us make meaningful progress. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) emphasises how crucial it is for the world to halve its greenhouse gas emissions this decade to at least have a chance of limiting global warming to 1.5oC. This means that solutions with an immediate effect have an important role to play. Biofuels can cut emissions from waste in landfills and provide much cleaner alternatives to fossil fuels to help accelerate the world’s decarbonisation efforts. They don’t require different engines to be of use. They just need funding to reach scale.
Mobeen Tahir, Director, Macroeconomic Research & Tactical Solutions, WisdomTree
Analys
SEB Metals Weekly: China Covid exit is bullish for metals

China Covid exit is bullish for metals
Softer inflation, slight macro-optimism, and China taking a rapid exit from Covid restrictions. Markets have become more optimistic. Inflation indices have eased and that has created some hopes that central banks won’t lift interest to a level that will kill the economy in 2023. Natural gas prices in Europe have fallen sharply. This has suddenly reduced energy-inflationary pressure and removed the direst downside economic risks for the region. But general market optimism is far from super-strong yet. The S&P 500 index has only gained 1.9% since our previous forecast on 1 Nov 2021, and oil prices are down nearly 10% in a reflection of concerns for global growth. China has however removed all Covid-restrictions almost overnight. It is now set to move out of its three years of Covid-19 isolation and lockdowns at record speed. Industrial metals are up 20% and the Hong Kong equity index is up 40% as a result (since 1 Nov-22). China’s sudden and rapid Covid-19 exit is plain and simply bullish for the Chinese economy to the point that mobility indices are already rebounding quickly. SEB’s general view is that inflation impulses will fade quickly. No need then for central banks across the world to kill the global economy with further extreme rate hikes. These developments have removed much of the downside price risks for metals in 2023 and we have to a large degree shifted our 2024 forecast to 2023.
Lower transparency, more geopolitics, more borders, and higher prices and exponential spikes. The first decade of this century was about emerging markets, the BRICs, the commodity price boom, the commodity investment boom, and free markets with free flow of commodities and labor with China and Russia hand in hand with western countries walking towards the future. High capex spending in the first decade led to plentiful supply and low prices for commodities from 2011 to 2020. A world of plenty, friends everywhere, free flow of everything, and no need to worry. The coming decade will likely be very different. Supply growth will struggle due to mediocre capex spending over the past 10 years. Prices will on average be significantly higher. There will be frequent exponential price spikes whenever demand hits supply barriers. Price transparency will be significantly reduced due to borders, taxes, sanctions, geopolitical alignments, and carbon intensities. Prices will be much less homogenous. Aluminium will no longer be just one price and one quality. Who made it, where was it made, where will it be consumed and what the carbon content will create a range of prices. Same for most other metals.
Copper: Struggling supply and China revival propel copper prices higher. Unrest in Peru is creating significant supply risks for copper as the country accounts for 10% of the global supply. Chile accounts for 27% of global production. Production there is disappointing with Codelco, the Chilean state-owned copper mining company, struggling to hit production targets. The Cobre Panama mine in Panama is at risk of being closed over a tax dispute between Quantum and the government. Cobre Panama is one of the biggest new mines globally over the past 10 years. The rapid exit from Covid restrictions in China is bullish for the Chinese economy and thus for copper demand and it has helped to propel prices higher along with the mentioned supply issues. The Chinese property market will continue to struggle, and it normally accounts for 20% of global copper demand while China accounted for 55% of global copper demand in 2021. While China is no longer prioritizing the housing market it is full speed ahead for solar, wind, EVs, and electrification in general. So, weakening Chinese copper demand from housing will likely be replaced by the new prioritized growth sectors. Global supply growth is likely going to be muted in the decade to come while demand growth will be somewhere between a normal 3% pa. to a strong 4% pa. to a very strong 5% pa. Copper prices will be high, and demand will hit the supply barrier repeatedly with exponential spikes as the world is working hard to accelerate the energy transition. Copper prices could easily spike to USD 15-16,000/ton nearest years.
Nickel: Tight high-quality nickel market but a surplus for a low-quality nickel. Nickel production is growing aggressively in Indonesia. The country is projected to account for 60-70% of global supply in 2030. This will become a huge and extremely concentrated geopolitical risk for the world’s consumers of nickel. Indonesia has an abundance of low-grade C2 nickel. The challenge is to convert low-quality C2 nickel to high-quality C1. We are set for a surplus of C2 nickel but the market for C1 nickel will depend strongly on the conversion capacity for C2 to C1. Low price transparency will also help to send prices flying between USD 20,000/ton and USD 30,000/ton. Strong growth in nickel production in Indonesia should initially call for prices down to USD 20,000/ton. But Indonesia is a price setter. It will account for 50% of global supply in 2023. It doesn’t make sense for Indonesia to kill the nickel price. If the nickel price drops, then Indonesia could quickly regulate supply. There should be a premium to nickel due to this. As a result, we expect the nickel price to average USD 24,000/ton in 2023. C2 to C1 conversion capacity may be strained and there should also be a monopoly premium due to the size of Indonesia. Converting C2 to C1 is however extremely carbon intensive and that could be an increasing issue in the years to come.
Zinc: Super-tight global market. European LME inventories are ZERO and zinc smelters there are still closed. European zinc smelters account for 16% of global zinc smelter capacity. Most of this was closed over the past year due to extremely high energy prices. European LME zinc stockpiles are now down to a stunning zero! The global zinc market is extremely tight. Reopening of European zinc smelting seems unlikely in H1-23 with a continued super-tight market as a result both in Europe and globally.
Aluminium: Price likely to be in the range of USD 2400 – 3200/ton and line with coal prices in China. Aluminium prices have historically been tightly tied to the price of coal. But coal prices have been all over the place since the start of 2021 with huge price differences between Amsterdam, Australia, and domestic Chinese coal prices which are now largely state-controlled. China banning imports of Australian coal, the Chinese energy crisis in 2021, and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 are ingredients here. This sent aluminium prices flying high and low. Coal prices in China today imply a price of aluminium between USD 2400/ton and 3150/ton with the LME 3mth aluminium price nicely in between at USD 2590/ton. The global coal market should now become more orderly as China now again is accepting Australian coal. Energy costs have fallen sharply in Europe and some producers in the Netherlands have talked about possible restarts of production. China is likely to reduce its exports of primary aluminium. Energy security of supply is high on the agenda in China, and it makes no sense to emit lots of CO2 in China and indirectly export energy in the form of primary aluminium. Growth in non-China aluminium demand in the years to come will have to be covered by non-China producers which have the potential to force prices higher and away from coal as the price driver. While LME has one price for the 3mth aluminium price we’ll likely get larger and larger price differences across the world in the form of possibly extreme price premiums for example in the EU and the US.

Analys
Solid demand growth and strained supply to push Brent above USD 100/b


Brent crude had a strong end of the year as it traded at the highest level since 1 December. It is a slow start to the new year due to bank holidays and Dated Brent trades close to USD 85/b. It averaged USD 99.9/b in 2022. We expect it to average more than USD 100/b on average for the coming year amid strained supply and rebounding demand. Chinese oil demand is set to recover strongly along with re-openings while non-OECD will continue to move higher. At the moment oil looks absurdly cheap as it is cheaper than natural gas in both EU and Japan and also cheaper than coal in Australia.
Some price strength at the end of the year. The Dated Brent crude oil price index gained 2.3% on Friday with a close at USD 84.97/b. It was the highest close since 1 December. This morning it is trading slightly lower at USD 84.8/b but the market is basically void of action due to bank holidays.

Gloom and doom but IEA, OPEC and US EIA project global crude oil demand to rise between 1 m b/d and 2.2 m b/d YoY in 2023. They also expect call-on-OPEC to rise between 0.3 m b/d and 1.0 m b/d. The US EIA projects demand to increase 1 m b/d in 2023 on the back of a growth of 1.3 m b/d in non-OECD where demand in India rises by 0.2 m b/d and China by 0.6 m b/d. In China this is of course to a large degree due to re-opening after Covid-19 lock-downs. But it is still a good reminder of the low base of oil demand in non-OECD versus OECD. India last year consumed 5 m b/d which only amounts to 1.3 b/capita/year versus a world average of 4.5 b/capita/year and European demand of 10 b/capita/year. Even China is still below the world average as its demand in 2022 stood at 15.2 m b/d or 4.0 b/capita/yr. Non-OECD oil demand thus still has a long way to go in terms of oil demand and that is probably one of the things we’ll be reminded of in 2023 as Covid-19 lock-downs disappear entirely.
Solid demand growth in the face of strained supply. Important to remember is that the world has lost a huge amount of fossil supply from Russia due to the war in Ukraine. First in terms of natural gas where supply to the EU and thus to the world has declined by some 2.5 m boe/d versus pre-war levels. Secondly in terms of crude and products. The latter is of course a constant guessing game in terms of how much Russian crude and product exports has declined. The US EIA however projects that crude oil production in the Former Soviet Union will be down 2 m b/d in 2023 versus pre-Covid levels and down 1.3 m b/d YoY from 2022 to 2023. We are thus talking up to 4.5 m boe/d of lost supply from Russia/FSU. That is a huge loss. It is the reason why coal prices are still trading at USD 200 – 400/ton versus normal USD 85/ton as coal is an alternative to very expensive natural gas.
Overall for 2023 we are looking at a market where we’ll have huge losses in supply of fossil energy supply from Russia while demand for oil is set to rebound solidly (+1.0 – 2.2 m b/d) along with steady demand growth in non-OECD plus a jump in demand from China due to Covid-19 reopening. Need for oil from OPEC is set to rise by up to 1.0 m b/d YoY while the group’s spare capacity is close to exhausted.
We expect Brent crude to average more than USD 100/b in 2023. Despite all the macro economic gloom and doom due to inflation and rising interest rates we cannot help having a positive view for crude oil prices for the year to come due to the above reasons. The Dated Brent crude oil price index averaged USD 99.9/b in 2022. We think Brent crude will average more than USD 100/b in 2023. Oil is today absurdly cheap at USD 85/b. It is cheaper than both coal in Australia and natural gas both in Japan and the EU. This is something you hardly ever see. The energy market will work hard to consume more what is cheap (oil) and less of what is expensive (nat gas and coal).
Latest forecasts by IEA, OPEC and US EIA for oil demand growth and call-on-OPEC YoY for 2023. Solid demand growth and rising need for oil from OPEC.

Oil demand projections from the main agencies and estimated call-on-OPEC. More demand and higher need for oil from OPEC

EIA STEO projected change in oil demand for different countries and regions YoY to 2023

US EIA Dec STEO forecast for FSU oil production. Solid decline projected for 2023.

US commercial crude and product stocks still below normal

Total US crude and product stocks including SPR. Declining, declining, declining.

US crude and product inventories both excluding and including Strategic Petroleum Reserves

US oil sales from US SPR is now coming to an end. Will make the market feel much tighter as it really is.

Brent crude oil is absurdly cheap as it today trades below both Australian coal and natural gas in both Japan and the EU. Coal and natural gas prices should trade lower while oil should trade higher.

EU diesel prices versus natural gas prices. Could start to move towards a more natural price-balance in terms of substitution.

-
Nyheter4 veckor ago
Oljepriset ser ut att vända uppåt i mars-april
-
Nyheter5 dagar ago
Oljepriset lägre än intervallet där USA ska köpa tillbaka olja – över hela terminskurvan
-
Nyheter4 veckor ago
Ryssland har stoppat oljeleveranserna till Polen via Druzhba-ledningen
-
Nyheter4 veckor ago
Priset på naturgas i USA nere på 2 USD
-
Nyheter4 dagar ago
Oman tar ett stort steg i att bli en stor producent av vätgas
-
Nyheter2 dagar ago
Den stora oljeoptimisten Goldman Sachs tror inte längre på 100 USD-olja i år
-
Nyheter3 veckor ago
Den sämsta apelsinskörden på 90 år i Florida
-
Nyheter3 veckor ago
USA inför en enorm tull på rysk aluminium