Följ oss

Analys

SEB – Råvarukommentarer, 12 november 2012

Publicerat

den

Sammanfattning av rekommendationer

SEB - Rekommenderingar om investeringar i råvaror

Råolja – Brent

Den gångna veckan har varit dramatisk i oljemarknaden. Brent har handlats, upp och ned, mellan 104.76 och 111.64 USD/fat. Flera olika faktorer har bidragit till volatiliteten,

  1. Stormen Sandy gjorde att stora delar av den amerikanska östkustens raffinaderier stängde. Efterfrågan på råolja sjönk tillfälligt medan efterfrågan på drivmedel sköt i höjden .
  2. Svag tysk ekonomisk statistik och oro över skuldkrisen i Europa pressade priset.
  3. Förnyade utbudsstörningar i Nordsjöfälten följer upp en höst med rekordlåg produktionsnivå.
  4. Geopolitisk oro i Mellanöstern med nya bombattentat i Damaskus och attentat och skador på viktiga oljeledningar.
  5. Presidentvalet i USA. När Barack Obama utropades till segrare utbröt ett veritabelt rally i de flesta tillgångsslag, inte minst olja. Effekten blev mycket kortlivad och redan samma dag följde ett lika kraftigt fall.
  6. Positiv ekonomisk data från USA och Kina. 7. Ledarskiftet i Kina väcker förhoppningar om utökade stimulanser.

Trots en oroväckande teknisk formation, se graf, där en stängning under 104.76 öppnar för ytterligare fall, så tycker vi att den nedre delen av veckans handelsintervall, kring 105-106 nivån, är köpvärd, då;

  • Vi det bedömer det som osannolikt att priset på råolja, varaktigt, kommer att falla under 105-nivån, såvida inte tillväxtprognoserna skrivs ned väsentligt. Den senaste statistiken från både Kina och USA indikerar att det värsta kanske ligger bakom oss. Samtidigt är situationen i Europa fortfarande illavarslande.
  • Oljepriset kommer att fortsätta vara väl understött av stora geopolitiska risker.
  • Det krävs ett högt oljepris för att stimulera tillräckliga investeringar i ny kapacitet.
  • Många producentländer behöver ett högt pris för att balansera budgeten.
  • Brent lämpar sig väl för produktion av mellandestillat som bensin och diesel. Lagren av mellandestillat är historiskt låga och den kommande vintern riskerar att urholka lagren ytterligare.
  • Produktionen i Nordsjön har, under hösten, varit kraftigt begränsad. Problemen skulle nu ha varit lösta men istället meddelas nu ytterligare störningar och förseningar.

Graf över prisutveckling på råolja

Elektricitet

Q1-2013 terminen på Nord Pool har sedan början av juni handlats i ett intervall mellan 39.60 och 44 EUR/MWh. God tillgång på vatten och lägre bränslepriser har pressat priset lägre.

Elpris och marginalkostnad på kolkraft - Diagram

I grafen är marginalkostnaden för kolkraft, blå linje, justerad. Verklig marginalkostnad är lägre.

Nu pekar ett antal faktorer mot en uppgång;

Kostnaden mellan att producera el i kolkraftverk vilket oftast är marginalprissättande och elterminerna, har under en tid varit ovanligt stor, se graf ovan. Därmed har det, tidigare, funnits mer fallhöjd i elterminerna. Sedan mitten av oktober har differensen successivt minskat, eftersom

  • Elpriset har fallit
  • Det europeiska priset på kol och utsläppsrätter har stigit.

Vid nuvarande differens ser vi potential för högre elterminspriser. Den utlösande faktorn för högre elpriser kommer sannolikt vara ett väderskifte. Sommaren och hösten har varit nederbördsrik. Blötvädret är redan inprisat, varför ett skifte till kallare och torrare väder bäddar för snabb uppgång. De båda uppgångar som skedde i oktober följde båda på moderata väderleksskiften, vilket visar på potentialen. Vår rekommendation är att ligga steget före, alltså att köpa innan ett eventuellt väderskifte, då det med stor sannolik kommer vara försent att agera när skiftet väl bekräftas.

Då utfallsrummet är begränsat (vi tror inte på priser över 44, så rekommenderar vi certifikatet Bull El X2 S, för att erhålla god utväxling på prisrörelsen.

SEB har följande börshandlade certifikat kopplade till elterminer på Nasdaq OMX.

Lång positionKort position

EL S – – – – – – –  Bear El X2 S
Bull El X2 S — Bear El X4 S
Bull El X4 S

Väderprognoserna är, i högsta grad, fortsatt blöta och milda men vi tror att nästa skifte till torrare, kallare väder, kortsiktigt kommer skicka marknaden högre. Inte minst om det kombineras med högre kol och CO2 priser, där det nu alltså finns tecken på att marknaden kanske har vänt. Vi rekommenderar därför att man agerar på det.

Guld och Silver

Guld har rekylerat upp. Marknaden tolkar valet av en fortsättning av ”change” i USA, som mer pengar i systemet, vilket talar för guld. Tekniskt ser diagrammet nedan dock inte fullt så positivt ut. 55-dagars glidande medelvärde fungerar då och då som ett motstånd och det ser ut att göra det nu. 1750, en nivå strax ovanför dagens kursnivå ser också ut att vara ett visst tekniskt motstånd. Vi rekommenderar dock köp av guld och silver, men vill då också gärna ha en stop-loss. En nivå man skulle kunna lägga en sådan är vid 1670, som markerar botten vid nedgången i början av november.

Spot gold pris - Diagram

Nedan ser vi kursdiagrammet för silver i dollar per troy ounce. Situationen är identisk med den för guld.

Kursdiagrammet för silver i dollar per troy ounce

Platina

Platina har fallit tillbaka med övriga metaller. Vi bedömer att dagens kursnivå är ett köptillfälle. Men de senaste dagarnas sidledes rörelse kan också vara en teknisk flagga, halvvägs ner från toppnoteringen i oktober. 1530 är en nivå som om den bryts, signalerar ytterligare nedgång. Det är därmed en nivå man bör ha sin stop-loss på.

Vi tror på ädelmetaller som placering i nuvarande makromiljö. Den oroliga utvecklingen i Sydafrika har redan påverkat utbudet märkbart. Vi tror att platina priset kommer att utmana igen och återgå till ”normaltillståndet”, d.v.s. att vara dyrare än guld.

Kursutveckling på platina under 2012 tom november

Basmetaller

I marknadsbrevet kommer vi från och med nu följa fler metaller: koppar, aluminium, zink och nickel. På London Metal Exchange (LME) handlas också traditionellt bly och tenn, vilka än så länge röner begränsat intresse i vår del av världen, både från industri och investerare. LME har relativt nyligen introducerat molybden och kobolt (s.k. minor metals) efter stor efterfrågan från industrin, men den finansiella handeln har inte riktigt kommit igång ännu. Situationen är liknande för LME:s stålkontrakt för Steel Billets.

Tillbaka till de stora kontrakten. Koppar är ”flaggskeppet” och har handlats sedan LME:s begynnelse för 130 år sedan. Aluminium, nickel och zink är nyare kontrakt som introducerades först på 70 och 80-talen. Alla fyra är nu helt accepterade av den globala metallindustrin, och LME:s officiella noteringar är prisbas för all fysisk handel, både primärt, i halvfabrikat och på återvunnen råvara (skrot i dagligt tal).

Den fundamentala och trendmässiga situationen varierar lite mellan metallerna. Vi har tidigare skrivit om koppar, vilken generellt bedöms ha den mest positiva fundamentala situationen, med stark underliggande efterfrågan i kombination med eftersläpande utbud. Det har lett till en nästan kroniskt tight marknad.

Aluminium drivs av stark efterfrågan. Ännu starkare än för koppar då metallen konstant hittar nya användningsområden. Aluminiums egenskaper bl.a. när det gäller vikt, gör att den tar marknadsandelar. Produktionen ökar också i hög takt. Tillgången på råvaran bauxit är mer eller mindre obegränsad (och billig) vilket borgar för ett stabilt utbud. Den trånga sektorn är energi, den största kostnaden vid framställning av aluminium.

Det största användningsområdet för zink är ytbehandling av stål, som drivs av tillväxtmarknadernas starka efterfrågan. Utbudet har kommit ikapp de senaste åren med följd att lagren ökat kraftigt. De är snart färdigbrutet i flera stora gruvor världen över. Ny kapacitet släpar efter, så zinken kan hamna i ett betydligt stramare läge de kommande åren.

60 % av allt nickel går till produktion rostfritt stål, vars marknad i genomsnitt vuxit med 5 % de senaste 25-30 åren. Utbudet av nickel har traditionellt hållits i några få händer varför det ofta uppstår brist (och höga priser). Produktionen ökar, delvis via produktion av tackjärn i Kina med högt nickelinnehåll, s.k. Nickel Pig Iron, som används vid som substitut till skrot.

Priserna ligger nu vid produktionskostnadsnivå

Aluminium, zink och nickel handlas, ur ett produktionskostnadsperspektiv, till väldigt låga nivåer. Priserna ”tuggar sig” ner i marginalkostnadskurvan. Ur det perspektivet talar mycket för en ytterst begränsad nedsida. Starkare konjunktur kan snabbt vända trenderna. Timingen beror mycket på lagersituationen, som varierar mellan metallerna. P.g.a. koppars, sedan många år, väldigt tighta läge har priset aldrig fallit tillbaka till marginalkostnadsnivå, av fundamentala skäl. Det finns en ”inbyggd” premie p.g.a. Kinas stora behov (geologiska förutsättningar saknas för tillräckligt stor inhemsk produktion), i kombination med minskande kopparhalter i de Chilenska gruvorna (landet står för 20-25 % av världsutbudet).

Vi följer upp kopparn i detta brev, och återkommer med löpande kommentarer på övriga metaller i kommande marknadsbrev.

Först vår generella syn på basmetaller just nu som sammanfattas nedan:

  • Stimulanspaketen startade septemberrallyt (QE3, ECB obligationsköp, infrastrukturinvesteringar i Kina 157 Mdr USD). Priserna steg 15-25 %.
  • Marknaden diskonterade ökad industriell efterfrågan som ännu inte har materialiserats.
  • Amerikansk statistik starkare än väntat de senaste veckorna (husmarknad, industriproduktion, arbetsmarknad). Marknaden har tolkat detta som att sannolikheten för ytterligare stimulanser minskar. Dessutom var ett presidentbyte en möjlighet vilket marknaden tolkade som risk för ny centralbankschef och därmed mindre monetära stimulanser.
  • Fonder likviderade – priserna tillbaka på ”ruta ett”.

Vart går marknaden härifrån?

  • Förväntade konsumtionsinriktade stimulanser i Kina.
  • Stora nya infrastrukturinvesteringar är också en möjlighet efter maktskiftet i Kina.
  • Fortsatt hög sannolikhet för penningpolitiska stimulanser i USA, Japan och Europa
  • Låga lager i industrin. Ett ”hand to mouth” beteende bland metallinköpare. Lagerbyggnad (ökad efterfrågan) förväntas nu när osäkerheten inför det amerikanska valet är över.
  • Många basmetaller är på historiskt på låga nivåer (nickel, aluminium och zink), på eller nära marginalkostnaden.
  • Vi tror på en positiv pristrend på 12 månaders sikt, med möjliga uppgångar på minst 25 %. Priserna kan vända redan före årsskiftet, men kommer troligtvis att accelerera först under Q1 och Q2 2013.

Koppar

Kopparn följde i mångt och mycket börserna och övriga finansiella marknader under veckan. Onsdagens kraftiga uppgång efter det amerikanska valet kom av sig i takt med att börserna föll tillbaka. LME-koppar noterades som högst i $7800 efter att börjat veckan på $7700, men stänger ned 1,6 % på nivåer kring $7600. Veckans lägsta såg vi på $7500. Vi varnade för den tekniska bilden som för tillfället har överhanden. Det påtalades då att ett brott av 7600 kan signalera ytterligare nedgång till den stora stödnivån 7400. Vi får inte räkna bort den risken.

Fundamentalt kvarstår vi med bedömningen att potentialen är större på uppsidan, och att vi snart kan komma i riktigt bra köplägen. Fler tecken i veckan tyder på vändning i Kina. Industriproduktion, detaljhandel och inflation kom in bättre än väntat. Inköpsindex har etablerat sig över 50 igen. Prisskillnaden mellan LME och Shanghai har nu, i och med LME:s nedgång, krympt varför fysiska aktörer tror på ökad import, kommande månader. Lagret om ca 700 tton, som enligt uppgift finns i kinesiska frihamnslager (det globala lagret av koppar beräknas till ca 1 Mton, ca 5 % av världsproduktionen), bedöms sitta på relativt fasta händer (som säkerhet för olika finansieringslösningar). Maktskiftet i Kina kan skapa ett visst vakuum den närmsta tiden då många aktörer väntar på finansiering för redan beslutade infrastrukturprojekt. Det som verkligen talar för koppar i detta sammanhang är det stora behovet av kapacitetsutbyggnad för elöverföring (kablar). Kina använder traditionellt mycket kopparkabel (en tendens i övriga världen är annars ökad användning av aluminium i kablar av kostnadsskäl).

Rapporter gör gällande att Kinas ”National Development and Reform Commission” som har ett mandat för strategiska råvaruinköp, har utrymme för, och planerar nya inköp av basmetaller. När det gäller koppar ryktas det om ca 200 tton. Historiskt sett har detta skett från tid till annan och det får utan tvekan stor prispåverkan. När och om Kina köper strategiskt, är naturligtvis omöjligt att sia om. Men bara ryktesspridningen och marknadens tidigare erfarenhet av dessa köp, kommer enligt vår uppfattning (i kombination med ovanstående faktorer) att ge stöd till kopparmarknaden.

Den tekniska bilden gör oss fortsatt avvaktande, men det letas köplägen, i synnerhet vid en fortsatt rörelse ned mot nivån $7400.

Teknisk prognos på kopparpriset den 12 november 2012

Kaffe

Kaffepriset (mars 2013) har konsoliderat sig strax under ett motstånd. Det ser onekligen ut som om marknaden gärna ”vill” handla upp priset, men det finns som vi ser ett starkt motstånd precis på den nivå som priset ligger nu. 160 cent per pund borde också vara ett starkt motstånd.

Kaffepriset har starka motstånd

För spannmål och övriga jordbruksprodukter hänvisas till veckans nyhetsbrev om jordbruksprodukter.

[box]SEB Veckobrev Veckans råvarukommentar är producerat av SEB Merchant Banking och publiceras i samarbete och med tillstånd på Råvarumarknaden.se[/box]

Disclaimer

The information in this document has been compiled by SEB Merchant Banking, a division within Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB (publ) (“SEB”).

Opinions contained in this report represent the bank’s present opinion only and are subject to change without notice. All information contained in this report has been compiled in good faith from sources believed to be reliable. However, no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made with respect to the completeness or accuracy of its contents and the information is not to be relied upon as authoritative. Anyone considering taking actions based upon the content of this document is urged to base his or her investment decisions upon such investigations as he or she deems necessary. This document is being provided as information only, and no specific actions are being solicited as a result of it; to the extent permitted by law, no liability whatsoever is accepted for any direct or consequential loss arising from use of this document or its contents.

About SEB

SEB is a public company incorporated in Stockholm, Sweden, with limited liability. It is a participant at major Nordic and other European Regulated Markets and Multilateral Trading Facilities (as well as some non-European equivalent markets) for trading in financial instruments, such as markets operated by NASDAQ OMX, NYSE Euronext, London Stock Exchange, Deutsche Börse, Swiss Exchanges, Turquoise and Chi-X. SEB is authorized and regulated by Finansinspektionen in Sweden; it is authorized and subject to limited regulation by the Financial Services Authority for the conduct of designated investment business in the UK, and is subject to the provisions of relevant regulators in all other jurisdictions where SEB conducts operations. SEB Merchant Banking. All rights reserved.

Fortsätt läsa
Annons
Klicka för att kommentera

Skriv ett svar

Din e-postadress kommer inte publiceras. Obligatoriska fält är märkta *

Analys

[If demand] ”comes around as forecast, Hallelujah, we can produce more”

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Saudi Arabia’s oil minister, Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman, last week stated at a conference in Calgary: ”I believe it when I see it. When reality comes around as it’s been forecast, Hallelujah, we can produce more” (Reuters, John Kemp). So Saudi Arabia wants to and will produce more once it is confident that there really is demand for additional crude. Saudi Arabia has good reason to be concerned for global oil demand. It is not the only one struggling to predict global demand amid the haze and turmoil in the global oil market following the Russian invasion of Ukraine and sanctions towards Russian crude and product stocks. Add a shaky Chinese housing market and the highest US rates since 2001. Estimates for global oil demand in Q4-23 are ranging from 100.6 m b/d to 104.7 m b/d with many estimates in between. Current crude and mid-dist inventories are low. Supply/demand is balanced to tight and clearly very tight for mid-dists (diesel, jet fuel, gasoil). But amid current speculative bullishness it is important to note that Saudi Arabia can undo the current upwards price journey just as quickly as it created the current bull-market as it drop in production from 10.5 m b/d in April to only 9.0 m b/d since July. Quickly resolving the current mid-dist crisis is beyond the powers of Saudi Arabia. But China could come to the rescue if increased oil product export quotas as it holds spare refining capacity. 

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities at SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

The oil market is well aware that the main reasons for why oil has rallied 25% over the past months is  reduced production by Saudi Arabia and Russia, global oil demand holding up better than feared together with still declining US shale oil activity. US oil drilling rig count fell by 8 rigs last week to 507 rigs which is the lowest since Feb 2022.

The big question is how strong is global oil demand and how will it hold up or even maybe increase in the coming quarters? And here the spread of estimates are still all over the place. For Q4-23 we have the following range of estimates for global oil demand in m b/d: 100.6; 101.8; 103.1; 103.2 and 104.7 from main oil market research providers. This wide spread of estimates is mindbogglingly and head-scratching both for analysts and for oil producers. It leads to a wide spread in estimates for Call-on-OPEC. Some say the current market is in a 2-3 m b/d deficit while others calculate that the global oil market today is nicely balanced.

The sanctions towards Russian crude and oil product exports with a ban on imports to the EU and UK has led to a large reshuffling of the global oil market flows which again has created a haze through which it is hard to gauge the correct state of the global oil market. 

We have previously argued that there may be a significant amount of ”pent-up-demand” following the Covid-years with potential for global oil demand to surprise on the upside versus most demand forecasts. But there are also good reasons to be cautious to demand given Chinese property market woes and the highest US interest rates since 2001!

The uncertainty in global oil demand is clearly at the heart of Saudi Arabia’s production cuts since April this year. Saudi Arabia’s Energy Minister, Prince Abulaziz bin Salman, last week stated at a conference in Calgary: ”I believe it when I see it. When reality comes around as it’s been forecast, Hallelujah, we can produce more” (Reuters, John Kemp).

So if it turns out that demand is indeed stronger than Saudi Arabia fears, then we should see increased production from Saudi Arabia. Saudi could of course then argue that yes, it is stronger than expected right now, but tomorrow may be worse. Also, the continued decline in US oil drilling rig count is a home-free card for continued low production from Saudi Arabia.

Both crude stocks and mid-dist stocks (diesel, jet fuel, gasoil) are still significantly below normal and the global oil market is somewhere between balanced, mild deficit or large deficit (-2-3 m b/d). The global oil market is as such stressed due to low inventories and potentially in either mild or large deficit on top. The latter though can be undone by higher production from Saudi Arabia whenever it chooses to do so.

What is again getting center stage are the low mid-dist stocks ahead of winter. The war in Ukraine and the sanctions towards Russian crude and product stocks created chaos in the global oil product market. Refining margins went crazy last year. But they are still crazy. The global refining system got reduced maintenance in 2020 and 2021 due to Covid-19 and low staffing. Following decades of mediocre margins and losses, a lot of older refineries finally decided to close down for good during Covid as refining margins collapsed as the world stopped driving and flying. The global refining capacity contracted in 2021 for the first time in 30 years as a result. Then in 2022 refining margins exploded along with reviving global oil demand and the invasion of Ukraine. Refineries globally then ran  as hard as they could, eager to make money, and reduced maintenance to a minimum for a third year in a row. Many refineries are now prone for technical failures following three years of low maintenance. This is part of the reason why mid-dist stocks struggle to rebuild. The refineries which can run however are running as hard as they can. With current refining margins they are pure money machines.

Amid all of this, Russia last week imposed an export ban for gasoline and diesel products to support domestic consumers with lower oil product prices. Russia normally exports 1.1 m b/d of diesel products and 0.2 m b/d of gasoline. The message is that it is temporary and this is also what the market expects. Russia has little oil product export storage capacity. The export ban will likely fill these up within a couple of weeks. Russia will then either have to close down refineries or restart its oil product exports.

The oil market continues in a very bullish state with stress both in crude and mid-dists. Speculators continues to roll into the market with net long positions in Brent crude and WTI increasing by 29 m b over the week to last Tuesday. Since the end of June it has increased from 330 m b to now 637 m b. Net-long speculative positions are now at the highest level in 52 weeks.

The market didn’t believe Saudi Arabia this spring when it warned speculators about being too bearish on oil and that they would burn their fingers. And so they did. After having held production at 9 m b/d since July, the market finally believes in Saudi Arabia. But the market still doesn’t quite listen when Saudi says that its current production is not about driving the oil price to the sky (and beyond). It’s about concerns for global oil demand amid many macro economic challenges. It’s about being preemptive versus weakening demand. The current oil rally can thus be undone by Saudi Arabia just as it was created by Saudi Arabia. The current refinery stress is however beyond the powers of Saudi Arabia. But China could come to the rescue as it holds spare refining capacity. It could increase export quotas for oil products and thus alleviate global mid-dist shortages. The first round effect of this would however be yet stronger Chinese crude oil imports. 

Brent crude and ARA diesel refining premiums/margins. It is easy to see when Russia invaded Ukraine. Diesel margins then exploded. The market is not taking the latest Russian export ban on diesel and gasoline too seriously. Not very big moves last week.

Brent crude and ARA diesel refining premiums/margins
Source: SEB graph and calculations, Blbrg data

ARA mid-dist margins still exceptionally high at USD 35-40/b versus a more normal USD 12-15/b. We are now heading into the heating season, but the summer driving season is fading and so are gasoline margins.

ARA refinary crack margin
Source: SEB graph and calculations, Blbrg data

ARA mid-dist margins still exceptionally high at USD 35-40/b versus a more normal USD 12-15/b. Here same graph as above but with longer perspective to show how extreme the situation is.

ARA refinary crack
Source: SEB graph and calculations, Blbrg data

US crude and product stocks vs. the 2015-19 average. Very low mid-dist stocks.

US crude and product stocks vs. the 2015-19 average
Source: SEB graph and calculations, Blbrg data

Speculators are rolling into long positions. Now highest net long spec in 52 weeks.

Speculators are rolling into long positions
Source: SEB graph and calculations, Blbrg data
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

The ”normal” oil price is USD 97/b

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

The Dated Brent crude oil price ydy closed at USD 96/b. Wow, that’s a high price! This sensation however depends on what you think is ”normal”. And normal in the eyes of most market participants today is USD 60/b. But this perception is probably largely based on the recent experience of the market. The average Brent crude oil price from 2015-2019 was USD 58.5/b. But that was a period of booming non-OPEC supply, mostly shale oil. But booming shale oil supply is now increasingly coming towards an end. Looking more broadly at the last 20 years the nominal average price was USD 75/b. But in inflation adjusted terms it was actually USD 97/b.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities at SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Saudi Arabia’s oil minister, Abdulaziz bin Salman, yesterday stated that its production cuts was not about driving the price up but instead it was preemptive versus the highly uncertain global economic development. In that respect it has a very good point. The US 2yr government bond rate has rallied to 5.06% which is the highest since 2006 and just a fraction away of being the highest since December 2000. The Chinese property market is struggling and global PMIs have been downhill since mid-2021 with many countries now at contractive, sub-50 level. Thus a deep concern for the health of the global economy and thus oil demand going forward is absolutely warranted. And thus the preemptive production cuts by Saudi Arabia. But killing the global economy off while it is wobbling with an oil price of USD 110-120/b or higher is of course not a smart thing to do either.

At the same conference in Canada yesterday the CEO of Aramco, Amin H. Nasser, said that he expected global oil demand to reach 110 m b/d in 2030 and that talk about a near term peak in global oil demand was ”driven by policies, rather than the proven combination of markets, competitive economics and technology” (Reuters).

With a demand outlook of 110 m b/d in 2030 the responsible thing to do is of course to make sure that the oil price stays at a level where investments are sufficient to cover both decline in existing production as well as future demand growth.

In terms of oil prices we tend to think about recent history and also in nominal terms. Most market participants are still mentally thinking of the oil prices we have experienced during the shale oil boom years from 2015-2019. The average nominal Brent crude price during that period was USD 58.5/b. This is today often perceived as ”the normal price”. But it was a very special period with booming non-OPEC supply whenever the WTI price moved above USD 45/b. But that period is increasingly behind us. While we could enjoy fairly low oil prices during this period it also left the world with a legacy: Subdued capex spending in upstream oil and gas all through these years. Then came the Covid-years which led to yet another trough in capex spending. We are soon talking close to 9 years of subdued capex spending.

If Amin H. Nasser is ballpark correct in his prediction that global oil demand will reach 110 m b/d in 2030 then the world should better get capex spending rolling. There is only one way to make that happen: a higher oil price. If the global economy now runs into an economic setback or recession and OPEC allows the oil price to drop to say USD 50/b, then we’d get yet another couple of years with subdued capex spending on top of the close to 9 years with subdued spending we already have behind us. So in the eyes of Saudi Arabia, Amin H. Nasser and Abdulaziz bin Salman, the responsible thing to do is to make sure that the oil price stays up at a sufficient level to ensure that capex spending stays up even during an economic downturn.

This brings us back to the question of what is a high oil price. We remember the shale oil boom years with an average nominal price of USD 58.5/b. We tend to think of it as the per definition ”normal” price. But we should instead think of it as the price depression period. A low-price period during which non-OPEC production boomed. Also, adjusting it for inflation, the real average price during this period was actually USD 72.2/b and not USD 58.5/b. If we however zoom out a little and look at the last 20 years then we get a nominal average of USD 75/b. The real, average inflation adjusted price over the past 20 years is however USD 97/b. The Dated Brent crude oil price yesterday closed at USD 96/b.

Worth noting however is that for such inflation adjustment to make sense then the assumed cost of production should actually rise along with inflation and as such create a ”rising floor price” to oil based on rising real costs. If costs in real terms instead are falling due to productivity improvements, then such inflation adjusted prices will have limited bearing for future prices. What matters more specifically is the development of real production costs for non-OPEC producers and the possibility to ramp up such production. Environmental politics in OECD countries is of course a clear limiting factor for non-OPEC oil production growth and possibly a much more important factor than the production cost it self.  

But one last note on the fact that Saudi Arabia’s energy minister, Abdulaziz bin Salman, is emphasizing that the cuts are preemptive rather then an effort to drive the oil price to the sky while Amin H. Nasser is emphasizing that we need to be responsible. It means that if it turns out that the current cuts have indeed made the global oil market too tight with an oil price spiraling towards USD 110-120/b then we’ll highly likely see added supply from Saudi Arabia in November and December rather than Saudi sticking to 9.0 m b/d. This limits the risk for a continued unchecked price rally to such levels.

Oil price perspectives. We tend to think that the nominal average Brent crude oil price of USD 58.5/b during the shale oil boom years from 2015-19 is per definition the ”normal” price. But that period is now increasingly behind us. Zoom out a little to the real, average, inflation adjusted price of the past 20 years and we get USD 97/b. In mathematical terms it is much more ”normal” than the nominal price during the shale oil boom years 

The new normal oil price
Source: SEB graph and calculations, Bloomberg data feed.

Is global oil demand about to peak 1: OECD and non-OECD share of global population

OECD and non-OECD share of global population
Source: SEB graph and calculations, UN population data

Is global oil demand about to peak 2: Oil demand per capita per year

Oil demand per capita per year
Source: SEB graph and calculations, BP oil data
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

USD 100/b in sight but oil product demand may start to hurt

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Some crude oil grades have already traded above USD 100/b. Tapis last week at USD 101.3/b. Dated Brent is trading at USD 95.1/b. No more than some market noise is needed to drive it above USD 100/b. But a perceived and implied oil market deficit of 1.5 to 2.5 m b/d may be closer to balance than a deficit. And if so the reason is probably that oil product demand is hurting. Refineries are running hard. They are craving for crude and converting it to oil products. Crude stocks in US, EU16 and Japan fell 23 m b in August as a result of this and amid continued restraint production by Saudi/Russia. But oil product stocks rose 20.3 m b with net draws in crude and products of only 2.7 m b for these regions. Thus indicating more of a balanced market than a deficit. Naturally there has been strong support for crude prices while oil product refinery margins have started to come off. Saudi/Russia is in solid control of the market. Both crude and product stocks are low while the market is either in deficit or at best in balance. So there should be limited down side price risk. But oil product demand is likely to hurt more if Brent crude rises to USD 110-120/b and such a price level looks excessive.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities at SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Crude oil prices have been on a relentless rise since late June when it became clear that Saudi Arabia would keep its production at 9 m b/d not just in July but also in August. Then later extended to September and then lately to the end of the year. On paper this has placed the market into a solid deficit. Total OPEC production was 27.8 m b/d in August and likely more or less the same in September. OPEC estimates that the need for oil from OPEC in Q3-23 is 29.2 m b/d which places the global market in a 1.4 m b/d deficit when OPEC produces 27.8 m b/d.

The proof of the pudding is of course that inventories actually draws down when there is a deficit. A 1.4 m b/d of deficit for 31 days in August implies a global inventory draw of 43.4 m b/d. If we assume that OECD countries accounts for 46% of global oil demand then OECD could/should have had a fair share of inventory rise of say 20 m b in August. Actual inventory data are however usually a lagging set of data so we have to work with sub sets of data being released on a higher frequency. And non-OECD demand and inventory data are hard to come by.

If we look at oil inventory data for US, EU16 and Japan we see that crude stocks fell 23 m b in August while product stocks rose 20.3 m b with a total crude and product draw of only 2.7 m b. I.e. indicating close to a balanced market in August rather than a big deficit. But it matters that crude stocks fell 23 m b. That is a tight crude market where refineries are craving and bidding for crude oil together with speculators who are buying paper-oil. So refineries worked hard to buy crude oil and converting it to oil products in August. But these additional oil products weren’t gobbled up by consumers but instead went into inventories.

Rising oil product inventories is of course  a good thing since these inventories in general are low. And also oil product stocks are low. The point is more that the world did maybe not run a large supply/demand deficit of 1.5 to 2.5 m b/d in August but rather had a more balanced market. A weaker oil product demand than anticipated would then likely be the natural explanation for this. Strong refinery demand for crude oil, crude oil inventory draws amid a situation where crude inventories already are low is of course creating an added sense of bullishness for crude oil.

On the one hand strong refinery demand for crude oil has helped to drive crude oil prices higher amid continued production cuts by Saudi Arabia. Rising oil product stocks have on the other hand eased the pressure on oil products and thus softened the oil product refinery margins.

The overall situation is that Saudi Arabia together with Russia are in solid control of the oil market. Further that the global market is either balanced or in deficit and that both crude and product stocks are still low. Thus we have a tight market both in terms of supplies and inventories. So there should be limited downside in oil prices. We are highly likely to see Dated Brent moving above USD 100/b. It is now less than USD 5/b away from that level and only noise is needed to bring it above. Tupis crude oil in Asia traded at USD 101.3/b last week. So some crude benchmarks are already above the USD 100/b mark.

While Dated Brent looks set to hit USD 100/b in not too long we are skeptical with respect to further price rises to USD 110-120/b as oil product demand likely increasingly would start to hurt. Unless of course if we get some serious supply disruptions. But Saudi Arabia now has several million barrels per day of reserve capacity as it today only produces 9.0 m b/d. Thus disruptions can be countered. Oil product demand, oil product cracks and oil product inventories is a good thing to watch going forward. An oil price of USD 85-95/b is probably much better than USD 110-120/b for a world where economic activity is likely set to slow rather than accelerate following large interest rate hikes over the past 12-18 months.

OPEC’s implied call-on-OPEC crude oil. If OPEC’s production stays at 27.8 m b/d throughout Q3-23 and Q4-23 then OPECs numbers further strong inventory draws to the end of the year.

OPEC's implied call-on-OPEC crude oil.
Source: SEB graph and calculations. Call-on-OPEC as calculated by OPEC in its Sep report.

Net long speculative positions in Brent crude and WTI. Speculators have joined the price rally since end of June.

Graph of net long speculative positions in Brent crude and WTI.
Source: SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data

End of month crude and product stocks in m b in EU16, US and Japan. Solid draw in crude stocks but also solid rise in product stocks. In total very limited inventory draw. Refineries ran hard to convert crude to oil products but these then went straight into inventories alleviating low oil product inventories there.

End of month crude and product stocks
Source: SEB table, Argus data

ARA oil product refinery margins have come off their highs for all products as the oil product situation has eased a bit. Especially so for gasoline with now fading summer driving. But also HFO 3.5% cracks have eased back a little bit. But to be clear, diesel cracks and mid-dist cracks are still exceptionally high. And even gasoline crack down to USD 17.6/b is still very high this time of year.

ARA oil product refinery margins
Source: SEB graph and calculations

ARA diesel cracks in USD/b. Very, very high in 2022. Almost normal in Apr and May. Now very high vs. normal though a little softer than last year.

ARA diesel cracks in USD/b.
Source: SEB graph and calculations, Blbrg data

US crude and product stocks vs. 2015-2019 average. Still very low mid-dist inventories (diesel) and also low crude stocks but not all that low gasoline inventories.

US crude and product stocks vs. 2015-2019 average.
Source: SEB graph and calculations, Blbrg data feed

US crude and product stocks vs. 2015-2019 averages. Mid-dist stocks have stayed persistently low while gasoline stocks suddenly have jumped as gasoline demand seems to have started to hurt due to higher prices.

US crude and product stocks vs. 2015-2019 averages.
Source: SEB calculations and graph, Blbrg data feed.

Total commercial US crude and product stocks in million barrels. Rising lately. If large, global deficit they should have been falling sharply. Might be a blip?

Total commercial US crude and product stocks in million barrels.
Source: SEB graph and calculations, Blbrg data feed, EIA data
Fortsätt läsa

Populära