Följ oss

Analys

Market likely to rewrite all Brent crude forecasts for 2018

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

SEB - Prognoser på råvaror - CommodityExactly two weeks ago we argued that Brent crude would probably reach $65/b before Christmas. And wow has that delivered quicker than we thought. Of course yesterday’s 3.5% jump to $54.27/b (intraday high of $54.44/b) did come on the back of the political events in Saudi Arabia. Princes, billionaires and ministers were arrested and accused of corruption while the real reason of course was to secure the way to the throne for Prince Mohammed Bin Salman (MBS). In our view the events in Saudi Arabia this weekend were merely a catalyst which drove the oil price higher and more quickly than expected. In general we see little reason to be concerned for the supply of Saudi Arabia’s production. That was probably also the main view by European traders yesterday as Brent crude traded only marginally up in the European season (aligned with some positive moves in metals) before US traders came into the market and kicked it higher.

What is really at the heart of why we think everyone now will revise their Brent crude forecasts for 2018 is the realisation that the Brent crude 1 month contract, the Brent “spot price”, is not really what the US shale oil players are getting for their crude oil. Whatever unhedged oil the US shale oil players currently are producing they will only get $57.3/b or the WTI 1 month price. And they won’t even get that as there is a transportation cost from the well-head to Cushing Oklahoma as a discount to that as well.

More importantly is what’s dictating shale oil players’ profitability for new investments, new drilling and additional wells. That is not the front month WTI price but the 1.5 year forward WTI price (the WTI 18 month contract) at which they can hedge new investments. And that price yesterday closed at only $53.3/bl. I.e. for new investments US shale oil players are only offered $53.3/bl for delivery at Cushing Oklahoma which is far away from the current Brent 1mth price of $64/b.

The WTI 18 mth contract traded as high as $57.4/b earlier in the year. So while the Brent 1mth price is rising to new highs of the year and highest since 2015, the WTI 18mth contract is still 3 dollar lower than its high this year and not at all giving a strong stimulating investment push for shale oil producers.

This is clearly a dream come true for OPEC. That they can have a high Brent 1mth price close to $65/b while at the same time not giving a strong price stimulus to US shale oil producers as they are only offered $53.3/bl on the curve. Yes, Christmas did indeed come early for OPEC this year! Then of course the question is whether Christmas will last all of 2018 or not. So what is at the heart of this Christmas present?

It is two-fold.

One is the increasing Brent crude oil backwardation with the Brent 1mth contract trading at a $5.1/bl premium to the the Brent 18mth contract. This comes partly as a result of the constant draw down in global crude oil inventories and partly due to the increasing net long Brent speculative positioning. And yes there is a relationship between backwardation and speculative length. When net length is increasing the backwardation is increasing.

At the moment net long Brent is at an all-time high. That will of course not last for ever. So in the next market turn when specs pull out the level of backwardation will soften somewhat as well. However, assume that OPEC+ will “hold” the market all through 2018 so that inventories continue yet lower. Not necessarily steeply lower but at least ticking lower. Then the Brent crude oil backwardation should not fall back to zero. Rather it should hold up at some level and then strengthen with declining stocks. In perspective the Brent 1 to 18 mth backwardation time spread traded around $7/b from mid-2011 to mid-2014 when Brent crude traded around $110/b. So the $5/b backwardation may be a bit rich as we are not quite back to a 2011-2014 situation quite yet.

The second and more important one is the increasing Brent to WTI spread we have witnessed this year. And it is not just in the front of the curves where the spread has widened out. It has happened all along the curve. In January the Brent 18mth to WTI 18 mth spread only traded at $1/b while it now trades at close to $6/bl.

When we look at global oil inventories they have been drawing down relentlessly since mid-March this year. In the US we have seen that oil product stocks have drawn down to normal with middle distillate stocks there down to below now ahead of winter. US crude stocks have however been a much more tedious and slow draw down as they in total still stand more than 100 mbl above a fair normal. However, if we split out the US mid-Continent which contains Cushing Oklahoma stocks where the WTI crude is priced we see that non-mid-Continent US crude stocks have been drawn down rapidly. The mid-Continent stocks however are actually now higher than a year ago and rising. And since this is where the WTI crude is priced it is holding down the WTI price.

The WTI crude curve is actually still in contango at the front end of the curve due to this. And since stocks in the mid-Continent are rising higher there is an increasing risk that the WTI crude price might break down into deeper front end contango and an even wider Brent to WTI spread and thus a lower WTI 1mth price.

We are thus likely going to witness a yet widening divergence between Brent and WTI crude oil price. Especially in the front. That is also why the net long speculative positions in WTI is not at an all-time-high as is the case with Brent positions. And those with a long position in WTI are at risk for a break-down in the WTI prices as the mid-Continent stocks continues to rise.

A key question for us at the moment (which we are unable to answer) is whether the rising crude stocks in the US mid-Continent now is due to natural bottlenecks due to lack of pipeline investments or whether it is due to damaged infrastructure following the Hurricane Harvey.

If it is the first then the bottleneck is probably of a lasting character. Then US shale producers have probably reached the short/medium term transportation capacity of getting their oil to the market. It will of course not last for ever as there is always possible to lay more pipes, but it takes time. In that case the Brent crude oil price can continue to rally without having to worry too much because the WTI price which then is stuck in surplus in the mid-US Continent. Then there is no point for US shale oil producers to increase production as they cannot easily get it to market. And the subdued WTI price will be the one telling them not to invest more and not to produce more since it will be low due to high mid-Continent stocks.

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

If the rising mid-Continental stocks are due to Hurricane Harvey damages then it might be quicker to mend. Then the Brent to WTI spread should contract from current levels once the Harvey damage is mended.

Looking at the US mid-Continent stocks we see that they started to rise at the end of August which was right at the time of Hurricane Harvey and has gone up by some 10 mbl since then. However, this might not be a good indication that Harvey is the culprit as inventories normally rise some 4 mbl during this period anyhow.

We are not quite sure whether it is Hurricane Harvey damage which drives US mid-Continental stocks higher or whether it is structural under investments in pipelines. However, as US shale oil production continues to rise (as we think it will in 2018) the pressure in terms of utilization of US oil pipeline transportation capacities will be increasingly taxed which is likely to hold the Brent – WTI price spread high.

So Brent crude oil price forecasts for 2018 are likely going to be revised up across the board as they now are likely to incorporate a more substantial Brent – WTI 1mth price spread for 2018. Current Brent crude 2018 Bloomberg consensus forecast currently stand at $56/bl with market pricing at $62/bl while SEB’s standing forecast from September is $55/bl.

The fundamental assumption for most forecasting methodologies is still that US shale oil is on the margin. For a long time the assumption has been that US shale oil can deliver almost unlimited at WTI $50/b. That assumption is now breaking down. US shale oil producers have not made money this year with investors now DEMANDING that they deliver profits and not just promises. While it is difficult to say exactly at what level they will create profits it is natural to shift the shale oil base floor price assumption from $50/bl to $55/bl. I.e. assuming that US shale oil production is not going through the roof with a WTI 18 mth price at $55/b. I.e. the WTI price is allowed to trade at $55/bl both in spot and on the curve without creating surplus havoc in the global market.

We thus expect revisions of Brent crude oil forecasts to assume a WTI 1mth crude price delivered at around $55/bl next year and then with a Brent 1mth to WTI 1mth price spread to Brent on top of some $5-7/bl thus placing Brent forecasts for 2018 at around $60-62/bl. Such assumptions are likely to affect our own Brent crude oil forecast for 2018 when we revise it in February next year.

Ch1) US commercial crude oil stocks less the US mid-continent are drawing down rapidly
Getting close to normal by end of year

US commercial crude oil stocks less the US mid-continent are drawing down rapidly

Ch2) US mid-Continent stocks (Pad2) have however rising and above last year.
This is where WTI crude is priced in Cushing Oklahoma and is why the WTI crude curve has front end contango with risk for deeper contango

US mid-Continent stocks (Pad2) have however rising and above last year.

Ch3) US shale oil regions

US shale oil regions

Ch4) Not all shale oil producers need to pass through Cushing Oklahoma
But the exact magnitude and location of bottlenecks getting shale oil to the U.S. Gulf we don’t know.
Looks like Eagle Ford and Permian have more options to bypass Cushing getting right to the US Gulf.
Are Eagle Ford and Permian producers actually getting a price closer to seaborne crude prices than to WTI?

Not all shale oil producers need to pass through Cushing Oklahoma

Ch5) Brent and WTI crude curves moving higher over last two weeks

Brent and WTI crude curves moving higher over last two weeks

Ch6) Brent 1mth contract has rallied to close to $65/b.
Steepening Brent backwardation and widening Brent – WTI crude spreads has left the WTI 18 mth contract in the doldrums no higher than $53.3/b

Brent 1mth contract has rallied to close to $65/b.

Ch7) The WTI 18 mth forward price at $53.3/b still short of year high of $57.4/b

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

The WTI 18 mth forward price at $53.3/b still short of year high of $57.4/b

Ch8) Brent 1mth to WTI 1mth crude spread has blown out

Brent 1mth to WTI 1mth crude spread has blown out

Ch9) And US crude oil is flushing out of the US as exports as a result of the strong widening in Brent to WTI
But as we see above it is not flowing out of the US mid-Continent where WTI is priced

And US crude oil is flushing out of the US as exports as a result of the strong widening in Brent to WTI

Ch10) US shale oil players are kicking drilling rigs out of the US at a WTI 18mth curve price of $50/bl
They can of course drill more but then they are begging a higher forward WTI price.
Risk for a smoke and mirror in these statistics as shale players are currently running some 100 drilling rigs more than they need.
They need to kick they out in order to align drilling with completions which still ran at a surplus in September as they drilled more than they completed.
We expect shale players to kick out 5-10 rigs every week to Christmas.
It will be sentiment bullish, but unlikely to impact completions all that much in 2018 as they have a load full of DUCs they can complete in 2018

Rig count

US shale oil players are kicking drilling rigs out of the US at a WTI 18mth curve price of $50/bl

Ch11) US shale players kicking out rigs at a WTI18 curve price of $50/bl

US shale players kicking out rigs at a WTI18 curve price of $50/bl

Ch12) Will shale players hold their horses as the mid-term WTI forward price moves higher?
Good reasons to believe that they will kick out more drilling rigs at WTI curve $50/b as investors demand profits

Will shale players hold their horses as the mid-term WTI forward price moves higher?

Kind regards

Bjarne Schieldrop
Chief analyst, Commodities
SEB Markets
Merchant Banking

Analys

Tightening fundamentals – bullish inventories from DOE

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

The latest weekly report from the US DOE showed a substantial drawdown across key petroleum categories, adding more upside potential to the fundamental picture.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

Commercial crude inventories (excl. SPR) fell by 5.8 million barrels, bringing total inventories down to 415.1 million barrels. Now sitting 11% below the five-year seasonal norm and placed in the lowest 2015-2022 range (see picture below).

Product inventories also tightened further last week. Gasoline inventories declined by 2.1 million barrels, with reductions seen in both finished gasoline and blending components. Current gasoline levels are about 3% below the five-year average for this time of year.

Among products, the most notable move came in diesel, where inventories dropped by almost 4.1 million barrels, deepening the deficit to around 20% below seasonal norms – continuing to underscore the persistent supply tightness in diesel markets.

The only area of inventory growth was in propane/propylene, which posted a significant 5.1-million-barrel build and now stands 9% above the five-year average.

Total commercial petroleum inventories (crude plus refined products) declined by 4.2 million barrels on the week, reinforcing the overall tightening of US crude and products.

US DOE, inventories, change in million barrels per week
US crude inventories excl. SPR in million barrels
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Bombs to ”ceasefire” in hours – Brent below $70

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

A classic case of “buy the rumor, sell the news” played out in oil markets, as Brent crude has dropped sharply – down nearly USD 10 per barrel since yesterday evening – following Iran’s retaliatory strike on a U.S. air base in Qatar. The immediate reaction was: “That was it?” The strike followed a carefully calibrated, non-escalatory playbook, avoiding direct threats to energy infrastructure or disruption of shipping through the Strait of Hormuz – thus calming worst-case fears.

Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB
Ole R. Hvalbye, Analyst Commodities, SEB

After Monday morning’s sharp spike to USD 81.4 per barrel, triggered by the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, oil prices drifted sideways in anticipation of a potential Iranian response. That response came with advance warning and caused limited physical damage. Early this morning, both the U.S. President and Iranian state media announced a ceasefire, effectively placing a lid on the immediate conflict risk – at least for now.

As a result, Brent crude has now fallen by a total of USD 12 from Monday’s peak, currently trading around USD 69 per barrel.

Looking beyond geopolitics, the market will now shift its focus to the upcoming OPEC+ meeting in early July. Saudi Arabia’s decision to increase output earlier this year – despite falling prices – has drawn renewed attention considering recent developments. Some suggest this was a response to U.S. pressure to offset potential Iranian supply losses.

However, consensus is that the move was driven more by internal OPEC+ dynamics. After years of curbing production to support prices, Riyadh had grown frustrated with quota-busting by several members (notably Kazakhstan). With Saudi Arabia cutting up to 2 million barrels per day – roughly 2% of global supply – returns were diminishing, and the risk of losing market share was rising. The production increase is widely seen as an effort to reassert leadership and restore discipline within the group.

That said, the FT recently stated that, the Saudis remain wary of past missteps. In 2018, Riyadh ramped up output at Trump’s request ahead of Iran sanctions, only to see prices collapse when the U.S. granted broad waivers – triggering oversupply. Officials have reportedly made it clear they don’t intend to repeat that mistake.

The recent visit by President Trump to Saudi Arabia, which included agreements on AI, defense, and nuclear cooperation, suggests a broader strategic alignment. This has fueled speculation about a quiet “pump-for-politics” deal behind recent production moves.

Looking ahead, oil prices have now retraced the entire rally sparked by the June 13 Israel–Iran escalation. This retreat provides more political and policy space for both the U.S. and Saudi Arabia. Specifically, it makes it easier for Riyadh to scale back its three recent production hikes of 411,000 barrels each, potentially returning to more moderate increases of 137,000 barrels for August and September.

In short: with no major loss of Iranian supply to the market, OPEC+ – led by Saudi Arabia – no longer needs to compensate for a disruption that hasn’t materialized, especially not to please the U.S. at the cost of its own market strategy. As the Saudis themselves have signaled, they are unlikely to repeat previous mistakes.

Conclusion: With Brent now in the high USD 60s, buying oil looks fundamentally justified. The geopolitical premium has deflated, but tensions between Israel and Iran remain unresolved – and the risk of missteps and renewed escalation still lingers. In fact, even this morning, reports have emerged of renewed missile fire despite the declared “truce.” The path forward may be calmer – but it is far from stable.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

A muted price reaction. Market looks relaxed, but it is still on edge waiting for what Iran will do

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent crossed the 80-line this morning but quickly fell back assigning limited probability for Iran choosing to close the Strait of Hormuz. Brent traded in a range of USD 70.56 – 79.04/b last week as the market fluctuated between ”Iran wants a deal” and ”US is about to attack Iran”. At the end of the week though, Donald Trump managed to convince markets (and probably also Iran) that he would make a decision within two weeks. I.e. no imminent attack. Previously when when he has talked about ”making a decision within two weeks” he has often ended up doing nothing in the end. The oil market relaxed as a result and the week ended at USD 77.01/b which is just USD 6/b above the year to date average of USD 71/b.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Brent jumped to USD 81.4/b this morning, the highest since mid-January, but then quickly fell back to a current price of USD 78.2/b which is only up 1.5% versus the close on Friday. As such the market is pricing a fairly low probability that Iran will actually close the Strait of Hormuz. Probably because it will hurt Iranian oil exports as well as the global oil market.

It was however all smoke and mirrors. Deception. The US attacked Iran on Saturday. The attack involved 125 warplanes, submarines and surface warships and 14 bunker buster bombs were dropped on Iranian nuclear sites including Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. In response the Iranian Parliament voted in support of closing the Strait of Hormuz where some 17 mb of crude and products is transported to the global market every day plus significant volumes of LNG. This is however merely an advise to the Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the Supreme National Security Council which sits with the final and actual decision.

No supply of oil is lost yet. It is about the risk of Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz or not. So far not a single drop of oil supply has been lost to the global market. The price at the moment is all about the assessed risk of loss of supply. Will Iran choose to choke of the Strait of Hormuz or not? That is the big question. It would be painful for US consumers, for Donald Trump’s voter base, for the global economy but also for Iran and its population which relies on oil exports and income from selling oil out of that Strait as well. As such it is not a no-brainer choice for Iran to close the Strait for oil exports. And looking at the il price this morning it is clear that the oil market doesn’t assign a very high probability of it happening. It is however probably well within the capability of Iran to close the Strait off with rockets, mines, air-drones and possibly sea-drones. Just look at how Ukraine has been able to control and damage the Russian Black Sea fleet.

What to do about the highly enriched uranium which has gone missing? While the US and Israel can celebrate their destruction of Iranian nuclear facilities they are also scratching their heads over what to do with the lost Iranian nuclear material. Iran had 408 kg of highly enriched uranium (IAEA). Almost weapons grade. Enough for some 10 nuclear warheads. It seems to have been transported out of Fordow before the attack this weekend. 

The market is still on edge. USD 80-something/b seems sensible while we wait. The oil market reaction to this weekend’s events is very muted so far. The market is still on edge awaiting what Iran will do. Because Iran will do something. But what and when? An oil price of 80-something seems like a sensible level until something do happen.

Fortsätt läsa

Centaur

Guldcentralen

Fokus

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Populära