Följ oss

Analys

You borrowed our market share – Now we want it back

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

From ”price over volume” to ”we want our market share back”. OPEC+ changed its wording big time last Sunday as it essentially shifted its strategy from ”price over volume” to instead ”price yes, but also volume”. OPEC+ has been regulating the supply oil oil since May 2020 when oil demand collapsed due to Covid-19. Since then the organisation has continuously been willing to adjust supply to whatever needed to balance the market. Oil market participants thus didn’t need to worry too much about changes in the outlook for global oil demand or non-OPEC+ supply growth as the oil cartel would adjust to balance the market whatever happened. That period has now come to an end. The oil price will now become much more sensitive to macro data related to economic growth and oil demand growth as well as changes in projections in non-OPEC+ production growth. 

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Little finesse when Saudi Arabia shifted from ”price” to ”volume” in 2014. Back in 2014 when Saudi Arabia decided that enough was enough in terms of losses in market share to booming US shale oil production it shifted tactics from ”price over volume” to ”market share” without much fines. Saudi Arabia then, without saying much, started to drop its Official Selling Prices sharply into the autumn of 2014. Finally in December 2014 it became official that OPEC would no longer shed market share to non-OPEC (essentially US shale) to defend the oil price.

This time however the shift in strategy is done with much more finesse and in a much more clever way. To start with OPEC+ is doing nothing what so ever in Q3-24. No change in production. As demand will seasonally rise a bit in Q3, this should ensure a fairly balanced market with no rise in inventories (maybe even a draw). At least according to estimated need for oil from OPEC+ (paper balances). The communicated plan is then to gradually add around 2 m b/d to the market from Q4-24 to Q3-25 with an increase of 750 k b/d already by January 2025. But the finesse is that the cartel is holding an open door to modify that plan by saying that ”if market circumstances do not allow it” they may not place the 2 m b/d of voluntary cuts back into the market from Q4-24 to Q3-25 anyhow. Anyhow they are making it clear that these volumes will eventually return to the market. And that is something which all non-OPEC+ producers will discuss at boardroom levels going forward.

IEA’s May report projects a decline in call-on-OPEC 2025 of 0.5 m b/d. Not acceptable for OPEC. The IEA, in its May report, is projecting that global demand will rise by 1.1 m b/d while non-OPEC supply will rise by 1.6 m b/d. The result is that OPEC will loose a market share of 0.5 m b/d in 2025 and thus have to cut the same to maintain market balance and prices. OPEC(+) is now saying that that is not a feasible path. They don’t want to cut yet more. Enough is enough.

No one believes that there is room for an additional 2 m b/d without crashing the price. No one believes that there is room in the global oil market for an additional 2 m b/d (the voluntary cuts) from OPEC+ from Q4-24 to Q3-25. At least not without crashing oil prices. The cartel probably doesn’t believe that either. And as a result it has left a backdoor open to modify their plans as they go by saying that they may modify these plans of added supply if market conditions do not allow the return of these volumes to the market.

The message is a warning shot to non-OPEC+ producers to scale back or face the consequences. The latest message from the cartel is a warning shot to non-OPEC+ producers. The market share that non-OPEC+ producers have grabbed since year 2020 is not for them to keep. The oil cartel want these volumes back. Preferably as fast as possible but with some levy with respect to time.

The cartel may hope to influence demand and non-OPEC+ supply for 2025. With its latest communication and actions the cartel may be hoping to modify the outcome for 2025 where the IEA is projecting that call-on-OPEC will decline by 0.5 m b/d. A little bit softer prices now, but no collapse, could help to ease inflation further, reduce interest rates faster, speed up global economic growth and thus potentially lift projected oil demand growth for 2025.

The messaging from the cartel will most likely also be widely discussed in non-OPEC+ oil producer boardrooms and not the least among shale oil producers. The natural conclusion they should arrive at is that they should ease back on production growth planes for 2025. Preferably by starting to shed some drilling and fracking activity already in H2-24.

So if as a result of all of this we get that global oil demand ends up growing 1.4 m b/d in 2025 rather than 1.1 m b/d in 2025 (IEA proj.) and non-OPEC+ production grows by 1.4 m b/d rather than by 1.6 m b/d (IEA proj.), then at least OPEC+ will be able to keep its market share in 2025 without further losses.

OPEC is now producing roughly 4 m b/d below normal production level. Not sustainable. Especially if it would need to cut yet further in 2025.

OPEC is now producing roughly 4 m b/d below normal production level.
Source: SEB graph and calculations, Blbrg data

Call-on-OPEC projected to fall from 27.4 m b/d in 2024 to 26.9 m b/d in 2025

Call-on-OPEC projected to fall from 27.4 m b/d in 2024 to 26.9 m b/d in 2025
Source: SEB graph, IEA data

Effective OPEC+ spare capacity close to 6 m b/d sitting idele.

Effective OPEC+ spare capacity close to 6 m b/d sitting idele.
Source:  Source: SEB graph, IEA data

Analys

Crude oil comment: Deferred contracts still at very favorable levels as latest rally concentrated at front-end

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Bouncing up again after hitting the 200dma. Bitter cold winter storm in Texas adding to it. Brent crude continued its pullback yesterday with a decline of 1.1% to USD 79.29/b trading as low as USD 78.45/b during the day dipping below the 200dma line while closing above. This morning it has been testing the downside but is now a little higher at USD 79.6/b. A bitter cold winter storm is hitting Texas to Floriday. It is going to disrupt US nat gas exports and possibly also US oil production and exports. This may be part of the drive higher for oil today. But maybe also just a bounce up after it tested the 200dma yesterday.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Some of the oomph from the Biden-sanctions on Russia has started to defuse with arguments running that these sanctions will only delay exports of Russian crude and products rather than disrupt them. The effects of sanctions historically tend to dissipate over time as the affected party finds ways around them.

Donald criticizing Putin. Biden-sanctions may not be removed so easily. In a surprising comment, Donald Trump has criticized Putin saying that he is ”destroying Russia” and that ”this is no way to run a country”. Thus, Donald Trump coming Putin to the rescue, removing the recent Biden-sanctions and handing him a favorable peace deal with Ukraine, no longer seems so obvious.

Deeper and wider oil sanctions from Trump may lift deferred contracts. Trump may see that he has the stronger position while Putin is caught in a quagmire of a war in Ukraine. Putin in response seems to seek closer relationship with Iran. That may not be the smart move as the US administration is working on a new set of sanctions towards Iranian oil industry. We expect Donald Trump to initiate new sanctions towards Iran and Venezuela in order to make room for higher US oil production and exports. That however will also require a higher oil price to be realized. On the back of the latest comments from Donald Trump one might wonder whether also Russia will end up with harder sanctions from the US and lower Russian exports as a result and not just Iran and Venezuela. Such sanctions could lift deferred prices.

Deferred crude oil prices are close to the 70-line and are still good buys for oil consumers as uplift in prices have mostly taken place at the front-end of the curves. Same for oil products including middle distillates like ICE Gas oil. But deeper and lasting sanctions towards Iran, Venezuela and potentially also Russia could lift deferred prices higher.

The recent rally in the Dubai 1-3 mth time-spread has pulled back a little. But it has not collapsed and is still very, very strong in response to previous buyers of Russian crude turning to the Middle East.

The recent rally in the Dubai 1-3 mth time-spread has pulled back a little.
Source: SEB graph and calculations, Bloomberg data

The backwardation in crude is very sharp and front-loaded. The deferred contracts can still be bought at close to the 70-line for Brent crude. The rolling Brent 24mth contract didn’t get all that much lower over the past years except for some brief dips just below USD 70/b

The backwardation in crude is very sharp and front-loaded.
Source: SEB graph and calculations, Bloomberg data

ICE Gasoil rolling forward 12mths and 24mths came as low as USD 640/ton in 2024. Current price is not much higher at USD 662/ton and the year 2027 can be bought at USD 658/ton. Even after the latest rally in the front end of crude and mid-dist curves. Deeper sanctions towards Iran, Russia and Venezuela could potentially lift these higher.

ICE Gasoil rolling forward 12mths and 24mths came as low as USD 640/ton in 2024.
Source: SEB graph and calculations, Bloomberg data

Forward curves for Brent crude swaps and ICE gasoil swaps.

Forward curves for Brent crude swaps and ICE gasoil swaps.
Source: SEB graph and highlights, Bloomberg data

Nat gas front-month getting costlier than Brent crude and fuel oil. Likely shifting some demand away from nat gas to instead oil substitutes.

Nat gas front-month getting costlier than Brent crude and fuel oil.
Source: SEB graph and calculations, Bloomberg data
Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Crude oil comment: Big money and USD 80/b

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Brent crude was already ripe for a correction lower. Brent closed down 0.8% yesterday at USD 80.15/b and traded as low as USD 79.42/b intraday. Brent is trading down another 0.4% this morning to USD 79.9/b. It is hard to track and assign exactly what from Donald Trump’s announcements yesterday which was impacting crude oil prices in different ways. But crude oil was already ripe for a correction lower as it recently went into strongly overbought territory. So, Brent would probably have sold off a bit anyhow, even without any announcements from Trump.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Extending the life of US oil and gas. The Brent 5-year contract rose yesterday. For sure he wants to promote and extend the life of US oil and gas.  Longer dated Brent prices (5-yr) rose 0.5% yesterday to USD 68.77/b. Maybe in a reflection of that.

Lifting the freeze on LNG exports will be good for US gas producers and global consumers in five years. Trumps lifting of Bidens freeze on LNG exports will is positive for global nat gas consumers which may get lower prices, but negative for US consumers which likely will get higher prices. Best of all is it for US nat gas producers which will get an outlet for their nat gas into the international market. They will produce more and get higher prices both domestically and internationally. But it takes time to build LNG export terminals. So immediate effect on markets and prices. But one thing that is clear is that Donald Trump by this takes the side of rich US nat gas producers and not the average man in the street in the US which will have to pay higher nat gas prices down the road.

Removing restrictions on federal land and see will likely not boost US production. But maybe extend it. Donald Trump will likely remove restrictions on leasing of federal land and waters for the purpose of oil and gas exploration and production. But this process will likely take time and then yet more time before new production appears. It will likely extend the life of the US fossil industry rather than to boost production to higher levels. If that is, if the president coming after Trump doesn’t reverse it again.

Donald to fill US Strategic Reserves to the brim. But they are already filled at maximum rate. Donald Trump wants to refill the US Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR) to the brim. Currently standing at 394 mb. With a capacity of around 700 mb it means that another 300 mb can be stored there. But Donald Trump’s order will likely not change anything. Biden was already refilling US SPR at its maximum rate of 3 mb per month. The discharge rate from SPR is probably around 1 mb/d, but the refilling capacity rate is much, much lower. One probably never imagined that refilling quickly would be important. The solution would be to rework the pumping stations going to the SPR facilities. 

New sanctions towards Iran and Venezuela in the cards but will likely be part of a total strategic puzzle involving Russia/Ukraine war, Biden-sanctions on Russia and new sanctions on Iran and Venezuela. All balanced to end the Russia/Ukraine war, improve the relationship between Putin and Trump, keep the oil price from rallying while making room for more oil exports of US crude oil into the global market. Though Donald Trump looks set to also want to stay close to Muhammed Bin Salman of Saudi Arabia. So, allowing more oil to flow from both Russia, Saudi Arabia and the US while also keeping the oil price above USD 80/b should make everyone happy including the US oil and gas sector. Though Iran and Venezuela may not be so happy. Trumps key advisers are looking at a big sanctions package to hit Iran’s oil industry which could possibly curb Iranian oil exports by up to 1 mb/d. Donald Trump is also out saying that the US probably will stop buying oil from Venezuela. Though US refineries really do want that type of oil to run their refineries. 

Big money and USD 80/b or higher. Donald Trump holding hands with US oil industry, Putin and Muhammed Bin Salman. They all want to produce more if possible. But more importantly they all want an oil price of USD 80/b or higher. Big money and politics will probably talk louder than the average man in the street who want a lower oil price. And when it comes to it, a price of USD 80/b isn’t much to complain about given that the 20-year average nominal Brent crude oil price is USD 77/b, and the inflation adjusted price is USD 102/b.

Fortsätt läsa

Analys

Donald needs a higher price to drive US oil production significantly higher

Publicerat

den

SEB - analysbrev på råvaror

Easing a bit towards the 80-line this morning following recent strong gains. Brent crude gained another 1.3% last week with a close of USD 80.79/b. It reached a high of USD 82.63/b last Wednesday. This morning it is inching down 0.3% to USD 80.5/b.

Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB
Bjarne Schieldrop, Chief analyst commodities, SEB

Donald needs a higher oil price to get another US shale oil production boom. Donald Trump declaring an energy emergency with promises of opening up federal land for oil exploration +++, may sound alarmingly bearish for oil. But the days when US oil production (shale) was booming at an average oil price of USD 58/b (2015-19) are behind us. Brent has averaged USD 81/b through 2023 and 2024, and US shale oil is now moving towards zero growth in 2026.

Donald Trump (and the US oil industry) needs a higher oil price to drive US oil production significantly higher over the next 4 years. The US oil industry also needs to know that there will be a sustainable need for higher US oil production. So, someone else in the oil market needs to exit to make room for more oil from the US. Iran and/or Venezuela will be the likely targets for Donald Trump in that respect. But it is still not obvious that the US oil industry will go for another period of strong oil supply growth with natural doubts over how lasting a possible outage from Iran and/or Venezuela would be.

Strong rise in speculative positions increases the risks for pullbacks below the 80-line. The new sanctions on Russia have pushed crude oil higher over the past weeks, but speculators have also helped to drive flat prices higher as well as driving the front-end of the crude curves into steeper backwardation. Speculators typically buy the front-end of the crude curves and thus tend to bend the forward curves into steeper backwardation whey they buy. So, curve shapes are not fully objective measures of tightness. Net-long speculative positions (Brent +WTI) rose 52.4 mb over the week to last Tuesday. In total they are up 415 mb to 577 mb versus the low point in the autumn of 162 mb in early September.

Brent crude has now technically pulled back from overbought with RSI at 65.2 and back below the 70-line. But washing out some long-specs with Brent trading sub-80 for a little while is probably in the cards still.

But this does not look like just a speculatively driven frothy flash-in-the-pan. But do not forget that time-spreads have been tightening since early December and flat prices have risen higher along with them. Thus, this is not just a speculatively driven frothy flash-in-the-pan. The new sanctions on Russia are also having a tightening effect on the market both on Crude, LNG and middle distillates. Add also in that Donald Trump needs a higher oil price to drive US oil production higher. So even if we find it likely that Brent crude will make a pullback below the 80-line, it does not mean that this is the end of the gains.

Net long speculative positions in Brent + WTI in million barrels

Net long speculative positions in Brent + WTI in million barrels
Source: SEB calculations and graph, Bloomberg data

52-week ranking of speculative positions in Brent + WTI and 52-week ranking of 1-7mth Brent time-spread.

52-week ranking of speculative positions in Brent + WTI and 52-week ranking of 1-7mth Brent time-spread.
Source: SEB calculations and graph, Bloomberg data

Brent crude 1mth vs. Dubai 1-3mth time spread. The Dubai time-spread is probably less impacted by speculative positions and thus a better reflection of actual physical conditions. This is rising yet a little more this morning.

Brent crude 1mth vs. Dubai 1-3mth time spread.
Source: SEB calculations and graph, Bloomberg data
Fortsätt läsa

Centaur

Guldcentralen

Fokus

Annons

Gratis uppdateringar om råvarumarknaden

*

Populära