Analys
US shale oil production growth slowing sharply


The US EIA yesterday released its monthly drilling and productivity data. It showed that US shale oil production is slowing down even faster than they assumed just one week ago in their monthly STEO oil market outlook. All through 2019 we have seen an ongoing sharp decline in drilling. The slowdown in production growth has however been much more muted as producers have been able to tap a large inventory of drilled but uncompleted wells (DUCs). The well-completion rate has been holding out at around 1350 to 1400 wells per month but now it suddenly fell off a cliff in November.

The number of usable wells in the DUC inventory has always been highly uncertain. We had expected the well-completion rate to hold out at around 1350 to 1400 until Feb/Mar next year before producers would be forced to reduce the completion rate in lack of usable wells in the DUC inventory. But now it is happening already in November. This could be noise, or it could be a sign that number of useful wells in the DUC inventory are fewer than expected.
Losses in existing production is still on the rise while new monthly production is in decline as fewer wells are completed. US shale oil production is now projected to grow by only 30 k bl/d in January (360 k bl/d annualized rate) and it is rapidly moving towards zero growth. If the well completion rate falls another 50-100 wells, we’ll have zero production growth in US shale oil production. Last week the US EIA projected that US shale oil production will be in contraction at the end of 2020 but still hold out at a 50 k bl/d production growth rate MoM through the first five months of 2020. Yesterday’s drilling and productivity data is probably indicating that these assumptions are too high, and that production is slowing down even faster than projected just one week ago. Our view is still that the US EIA is estimating drilling productivity at too high a level because the DUC inventory is being drawn down and thus crates an image of high production per drilling rig in operation.
In a nutshell the number of drilled wells went down by 79 wells, completed wells went down by 155, the DUC inventory declined by 131 wells, production growth fell in 5 out of 7 regions with only one region slightly higher and one unchanged. Non-Permian production will decline by 18 k bl/d MoM in January (216 k bl/d annualized decline rate) and total US shale oil production will only grow by 30 k bl/d in January (360 k bl/d annualized rate).
Across the raw material space, the mantra today is “profit, not volume”, so also in shale oil. It is lack of profitability which is driving down the activity in US shale oil production. It is not lack of ability to produce.
Yesterday’s data and reports from the US EIA is truly great reading for OPEC+. It makes the task of controlling the supply/demand balance in the global oil market next year so much easier. Rather than US shale oil flooding into the market at an increasing rate it is now instead rapidly moving towards zero growth. That makes it much more controllable for OPEC+.
The great thing about US shale oil seen in the eyes of OPEC is the sharp underlying decline rate. OPEC can at any time get back its lost market share probably within a year or so. All it needs to do is to let the oil price drop down deep for 6-12 months. US shale oil production would crash, demand would boom on low prices and voila OPEC’s market share would be back to normal.
So, in terms of market share OPEC has nothing to worry about. It can easily and quickly get it back again anytime it wants to. This would not have been the case if the new oil supply in the US had been more like classic oil which typically never goes away before 10 years or more have passed. A lower price would of course be the price to pay for getting back the lost market share. But time of getting it back would be quick.
Ch1: The number of completed shale oil wells in the US fell off a cliff in November. Much sooner than expected.
Ch2: If US shale oil producers reduce the number of completed wells by another 58 wells then US shale oil production will have zero growth in January rather than a projected growth rate of 30 k bl/d MoM as projected by the US EIA yesterday
Ch3: The US EIA is over-estimating the drilling productivity due to the DUC inventory draw
Ch4: The US shale oil DUC inventory is drawing down. We had expected that the draw down rate should accelerate with the DUC inventory then bottoming out at around 5,500 where it bottomed out last time. But the draw down slowed in November. Lack of good wells in the DUC inventory?
Ch5: SEB well productivity estimate
Ch6: The productive value of drilled wells has fallen for a long time as the number of drilled wells per month has declined along with a lower drilling rig count. New in November was that the completion rate also declined sharply. It was bound to happen sooner or later but now it happened sooner.
Ch7: Losses in existing production continued to rise while new production is declining. When they meet overall production growth will be zero and then rapidly decline as new production goes below losses in existing production. It’s like breaking off a stick in terms of production. That’s what we saw back in early 2015.
Ch8: US production growth is slowing down. Non-Permian shale oil production is now in decline by a marginal, annualized rate of 216 k bl/d/yr.
Analys
A deliberate measure to push oil price lower but it is not the opening of the floodgates

Hurt by US tariffs and more oil from OPEC+. Brent crude fell 2.1% yesterday to USD 71.62/b and is down an additional 0.9% this morning to USD 71/b. New tariff-announcements by Donald Trump and a decision by OPEC+ to lift production by 138 kb/d in April is driving the oil price lower.

The decision by OPEC+ to lift production is a deliberate decision to get a lower oil price. All the members in OPEC+ wants to produce more as a general rule. Their plan and hope for a long time has been that they could gradually revive production back to a more normal level without pushing the oil price lower. As such they have postponed the planned production increases time and time again. Opting for price over volume. Waiting for the opportunity to lift production without pushing the price lower. And now it has suddenly changed. They start to lift production by 138 kb/d in April even if they know that the oil market this year then will run a surplus. Donald Trump is the reason.
Putin, Muhammed bin Salman (MBS) and Trump all met in Riyadh recently to discuss the war in Ukraine. They naturally discussed politics and energy and what is most important for each and one of them. Putin wants a favorable deal in Ukraine, MBS may want harsher measures towards Iran while Trump amongst other things want a lower oil price. The latter is to appease US consumers to which he has promised a lower oil price. A lower oil price over the coming two years could be good for Trump and the Republicans in the mid-term elections if a lower oil price makes US consumers happy. And a powerful Trump for a full four years is also good for Putin and MBS.
This is not the opening of the floodgates. It is not the start of blindly lifting production each month. It is still highly measured and controlled. It is about lowering the oil price to a level that is acceptable for Putin, MBS, Trump, US oil companies and the US consumers. Such an imagined ”target price” or common denominator is clearly not USD 50-55/b. US production would in that case fall markedly and the finances of Saudi Arabia and Russia would hurt too badly. The price is probably somewhere in the USD 60ies/b.
Brent crude averaged USD 99.5/b, USD 82/b and USD 80/b in 2022, 2023 and 2024 respectively. An oil price of USD 65/b is markedly lower in the sense that it probably would be positively felt by US consumers. The five-year Brent crude oil contract is USD 67/b. In a laxed oil market with little strain and a gradual rise in oil inventories we would see a lowering of the front-end of the Brent crude curve so that the front-end comes down to the level of the longer dated prices. The longer-dated prices usually soften a little bit as well when this happens. The five-year Brent contract could easily slide a couple of dollars down to USD 65/b versus USD 67/b.
Brent crude 1 month contract in USD/b. USD 68.68/b is the level to watch out for. It was the lowpoint in September last year. Breaking below that will bring us to lowest level since December 2021.

Analys
Brent whacked down yet again by negative Trump-fallout

Sharply lower yesterday with negative US consumer confidence. Brent crude fell like a rock to USD 73.02/b (-2.4%) yesterday following the publishing of US consumer confidence which fell to 98.3 in February from 105.3 in January (100 is neutral). Intraday Brent fell as low as USD 72.7/b. The closing yesterday was the lowest since late December and at a level where Brent frequently crossed over from September to the end of last year. Brent has now lost both the late December, early January Trump-optimism gains as well as the Biden-spike in mid-Jan and is back in the range from this Autumn. This morning it is staging a small rebound to USD 73.2/b but with little conviction it seems. The US sentiment readings since Friday last week is damaging evidence of the negative fallout Trump is creating.

Evidence growing that Trump-turmoil are having negative effects on the US economy. The US consumer confidence index has been in a seesaw pattern since mid-2022 and the reading yesterday was reached twice in 2024 and close to it also in 2023. But the reading yesterday needs to be seen in the context of Donald Trump being inaugurated as president again on 20 January. The reading must thus be interpreted as direct response by US consumers to what Trump has been doing since he became president and all the uncertainty it has created. The negative reading yesterday also falls into line with the negative readings on Friday, amplifying the message that Trump action will indeed have a negative fallout. At least the first-round effects of it. The market is staging a small rebound this morning to USD 73.3/b. But the genie is out of the bottle: Trump actions is having a negative effect on US consumers and businesses and thus the US economy. Likely effects will be reduced spending by consumers and reduced capex spending by businesses.
Brent crude falling lowest since late December and a level it frequently crossed during autumn.

White: US Conference Board Consumer Confidence (published yesterday). Blue: US Services PMI Business activity (published last Friday). Red: US University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment (published last Friday). All three falling sharply in February. Indexed 100 on Feb-2022.

Analys
Crude oil comment: Price reaction driven by intensified sanctions on Iran

Brent crude prices bottomed out at USD 74.20 per barrel at the close of trading on Friday, following a steep decline from USD 77.15 per barrel on Thursday evening (February 20th). During yesterday’s trading session, prices steadily climbed by roughly USD 1 per barrel (1.20%), reaching the current level of USD 75 per barrel.

Yesterday’s price rebound, which has continued into today, is primarily driven by recent U.S. actions aimed at intensifying pressure on Iran. These moves were formalized in the second round of sanctions since the presidential shift, specifically targeting Iranian oil exports. Notably, the U.S. Treasury Department has sanctioned several Iran-related oil companies, added 13 new tankers to the OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control) sanctions list, and sanctioned individuals, oil brokers, and terminals connected to Iran’s oil trade.
The National Security Presidential Memorandum 2 now calls for the U.S. to ”drive Iran’s oil exports to zero,” further asserting that Iran ”can never be allowed to acquire or develop nuclear weapons.” This intensified focus on Iran’s oil exports is naturally fueling market expectations of tighter supply. Yet, OPEC+ spare capacity remains robust, standing at 5.3 million barrels per day, with Saudi Arabia holding 3.1 million, the UAE 1.1 million, Iraq 600k, and Kuwait 400k. As such, any significant price spirals are not expected, given the current OPEC+ supply buffer.
Further contributing to recent price movements, OPEC has yet to decide on its stance regarding production cuts for Q2 2025. The group remains in control of the market, evaluating global supply and demand dynamics on a monthly basis. Given the current state of the market, we believe there is limited capacity for additional OPEC production without risking further price declines.
On a more bullish note, Iraq reaffirmed its commitment to the OPEC+ agreement yesterday, signaling that it would present an updated plan to compensate for any overproduction, which supports ongoing market stability.
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Belgien gör en u-sväng, går från att lägga ner kärnkraft till att bygga ny
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Priset på arabica-kaffebönor är nu över 4 USD per pund för första gången någonsin
-
Nyheter3 veckor sedan
Glansen är tillbaka på guldet
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
The Damocles Sword of OPEC+ hanging over US shale oil producers
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude oil comment: Balancing act
-
Analys4 veckor sedan
Crude oill comment: Caught between trade war fears and Iranian supply disruption risk
-
Nyheter4 veckor sedan
Guldpriset stiger till över 1 miljon kronor per kilo
-
Nyheter2 veckor sedan
Christian Kopfer om guld, olja och stål