Analys
US crude recovery could cover all OPEC cuts
Over the last two weeks Brent crude has fallen close to $4/b. Market perception has shifted from “OPEC will do the job and US crude production will recover gradually” to instead “Can OPEC do the job? and US production is rebounding strongly”. The hypothesis that US crude oil production will only recover gradually and slowly as long as the oil price stays below $60/b has clearly fallen. The US EIA projects that US crude production will move above its April 2015 peak of 9.6 mb/d in February 2018. We think that this will happen already in October 2017. However, if we extrapolate the average weekly increase since the start of 2017 (+33.9 kb/d/week) we get that with a starting point of 9.1 mb/d on the 10th of March then US crude production will pass the 9.6 mb/d already in June 2017. Thus full attention to the US EIA’s weekly publishing of US crude production is clearly warranted.
If US production had only recovered slowly as long as the oil price stayed below $60/b, then it would easily have been in OPEC’s power to drive the oil price rather quickly back to $60/b. However, US shale oil rig count rose by 7 rigs per week in H2-17 when the WTI 15mth forward price averaged around $52/b in H2-16. When that part of the forward curve was pushed up to $55-56/b following OPEC’s decision to cut it lifted the weekly rig count additions to 9.2 rigs/week on average so far in 2017. Along with the latest sell-off the WTI 15mths price has now fallen back to $50.5/b. This can be interpreted as an effort by the market to push back the current acceleration in shale oil investments. If this price stays at this level of about $50/b then we won’t know the effect of this before some 6-8 weeks down the road which is the typical lag between price action to rig count reaction. Thus the growth in US shale oil rig count is likely to continue unabated all through April.
OPEC will meet on the 25th of May this year to discuss whether to continue its cuts or not. US crude oil production stood at 8.7 mb/d when OPEC decided to cut at its 30th November meeting in 2016. That was only 0.25 mb/b above the US crude production trough of 8.45 mb/d in July/August 2016. The general view then was clearly that US crude production would recover gradually. There would not be much acceleration unless the oil price moved up to $60/b. OPEC decided to cut 1.16 mb/d from its October production level which lead to a production target of 31.8 mb/d for H1-17. So far OPEC has cut 0.4 mb/d less than planned with an averaged Jan/Feb production of 32.2 mb/d. I.e. the organisation has cut some 0.8 mb/d versus its October 2016 level. Back in November a US crude production rebound was not even on the horizon and not much discussed. The US EIA’s monthly report only stretched out to the end of 2017 with a prediction that US crude production would hit 8.94 mb/d in Dec 2017 which was just 250 kb/d above the US crude production in November 2016.
Now it all looks different. If we look away from EIA’s projection of US hitting 9.6 mb/d in Feb 2018 and instead focus on the latest weekly production data of 9.1 mb/d and extend it with the growth trend so far this year then US production would hit close to 9.5 mb/d just when OPEC’s members meet on the 25th of May. US production would then have increased by close to 0.8 mb/d since OPEC decided to cut in November 2016. That is close to exactly what OPEC has cut in Jan and Feb. Thus if OPEC’s compliance to the decided cuts don’t rise from here then US crude oil production recovery could end up rising equaly much as OPEC ended up cutting. The previous oil minister in Saudi Arabia, Ali al-Naimi’s words that an OPEC cut would only yield a lower market share while not necessarily lift the oil price may start to ring in the back of the head of OPEC’s members. We don’t expect OPEC to extend its cuts into H2-17. We have this itching feeling that OPEC compliance to cuts may start to erode towards the end of H1-17. Especially if the expectation is that there will be no further cuts.
Speculative market repositioning helped to shift oil prices lower
The pullback in the oil price last two weeks was clearly a repositioning in speculative positions as holders of long positions started to be concerned about the increasingly visible strong US production recovery. Net long speculative positions in WTI reached close to 600 mb some 4 weeks ago but have now sold off back down to 500 mb. A more neutral level is however around 350 mb. Thus there is still risk for further bearish repositioning.
We still expect Brent crude at $57.5/b in Q2-17 before falling back to $52.5/b in Q4-17
We are still positive for crude oil prices into Q2-17 where we expect front month Brent to average $57.5/b. We expect to see inventories to start to draw any moment as OPEC’s elevated production in Nov and Dec now increasingly is assimilated. Global refineries are also now increasingly coming back on line thus starting to process crude oil again. As oil inventories continues to draw as it did all through H2-16 we expect the forward crude oil curves to flip fully into backwardation. This will then enable the Brent crude oil front month contract to move up to $57.5/b while still leaving the WTI 15mth contract at around $51-52/b. Our outlook for Q2-17 is however at risk if US crude oil production continues to grow at its current trend rate. We still expect Brent crude to head down to average $52.5/b in Q4-17 in order to cool US shale oil production growth.
We expect OECD inventories to draw down 160 million barrels in 2017
The market was disappointed when it heard from IEA that OECD inventories rose by 48 mb in January. In perspective however, OECD inventories normally increase by some 30 mb from Dec to Jan. Thus the increase in inventories was only 18 mb more than normal. What is striking is that OECD’s inventories trended downwards all through H2-16 and ended down y/y for the first time in a long, long time in both December and January. And this was even without the help of OPEC cuts. We still expect the oil market to run a deficit of some 0.4 mb/d in 2017 thus resulting in a steady draw in inventories. Thus we have passed the OECD peak inventories and we are now heading downwards. The higher activation of US shale oil rigs than expected over the last two to three months has however impacted our projected supply/demand balance for 2018 leading to virtually no deficit in 2018 and thus very limited draws. Thus 2018 look likely to be a waiting year for the oil market with still plenty of oil in OECD inventories and with few pressure points.
Ch1: OECD down y/y for the first time in a long time in Dec and Jan
We are past the peak OECD inventories. To draw down from here
Ch2: Strong US production growth recovery is posing a problem for OPEC
OPEC cuts unlikely to continue in H2-17 as US production may reach 9.5 mb/d already in late May (trend extrapolation)
Ch3: Latest sell-off has increased the depth of front end crude curve contango
This contango and discount for spot crude prices versus longer dated contracts is just what OPEC wants to get away from
The 1-2 year forward WTI curve has shifted down to $50/b which would reduce the profitability for new shale oil investments
Ch4: Net long speculative WTI positions has pulled back but are still high
Now standing at 500,000 contracts or 500 million barrels.
Neutral level would be around 350 million barrels
Ch5: OPEC production at 32.16 mb/d in Feb and thus some 350 kb/d above its target.
Will OPEC compliance fall apart if it becomes increasingly clear that there will be no cuts in H2-17?
Ch6: We still expect a deficit the next three years despite strong US production growth
The balance assumes no OPEC cuts after H1-17
Ch7: Due to current high OECD inventories the global oil market is fine all through 2017 and 2018.
Not a lot of pressure points to be seen before 2019
Ch8: And yes, we are bullish US crude oil production but even more than that is needed in 2019
Then it all boils down to “too little too late” or “too much too soon”.
The US EIA is lifting its prognosis every month all since last July.
We expect them to continue to do that going forward as well as the EIA prognosis is still way behind the curve in our view.
Kind regards
Bjarne Schieldrop
Chief analyst, Commodities
SEB Markets
Merchant Banking
Market is starting to take US/Iran headlines with a pinch of salt. Brent crude rose $2.8/b yesterday to an official close of $112.1/b. But after that it traded as low as $108.05/b before ending late night at around $109.7/b. Through the day it traded in a range of $106.87 – 112.72/b amid a flurry of news or rumors from Iran and the US. ”US temporary sanctions during negotiations” (falls alarm). ”We will bomb Iran” (not anyhow),… etc. While the market is still fluctuating to this kind of news flow, it is starting to take such headlines with a pinch of salt.
We’ll see. Maybe, maybe not. The Brent M1 contract is trading at $110.2/b this morning which very close to the average ticks through yesterday of $110.4/b.
Trump with bearish, verbal intervention whenever Brent trades above $110/b it seems. What seems to be a pattern is that Trump states something like ”very good negotiations going on with Iran”, ”New leaders in Iran are great,..”, ”Great progress in negotiations,…”, ”Deal in sight,..” etc whenever the Brent M1 contract trades above $110/b. An effort to cool the market. These hot air verbal interventions from Trump used to have a heavy bearish impact on prices, but they now seems to have less and less effect unless they are backed by reality.
As far as we can see there has been no real progress in the negotiations between the US and Iran with both sides still standing by their previous demands.
Iran is getting stronger while the cease fire lasts making a return to war for Trump yet harder. Iran is naturally in constant preparation for a return to war given Trump’s steady threats of bombing Iran again. Iran is naturally doing what ever is possible to prepare for a return to war. And every day the cease fire lasts it is better prepared. This naturally makes it more and more difficult and dangerous for the US to return to warring activity versus Iran as the consequences for energy infrastructure in the Persian Gulf will be more and more severe the longer the cease fire lasts. Israel seems to see it this way as well. That the war is not won and that current frozen state of a cease fire gives Iran opportunity to rebuild military and politically.
Global inventories are drawing down day by day. How much? In the meantime the Strait of Hormuz stays closed. There is varying measures and estimates of how much global inventories are drawing down. Our rough estimate, back of the envelope, is that global inventories are drawing down by at least some 10 mb/d or about 300 mb/d in a balance between loss of supply versus demand destruction. Other estimates we see are a monthly draw of 250-270 mb/d. The IEA only ’measured’ a draw in global observable stocks of 117 mb in April with oil on water rising 53 mb while on shore stocks fell 170 mb. But global stocks are hard to measure with large invisible, unmeasured stocks. As such a back of the envelope approach may be better.
Oil products is what the world is consuming. Oil product prices likely to rise while product stocks fall. Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR) are predominantly crude oil. Discharging oil from OECD SPR stocks, a sharp reduction in Chinese crude imports and a reduction in global refinery throughput of 6-7 mb/d has helped to keep crude oil markets satisfactorily supplied. But global inventories are drawing down none the less. And oil products is really what the world is consuming. So if global refinery throughput stays subdued, then demand will eventually have to match the supply of oil products. The likely path forward this summer is a steady draw down in jet fuel, diesel and gasoline. Higher prices for these. Then, if possible, higher refinery throughput and higher usage of crude in response to very profitable refinery margins. And lastly sharper draw in crude stocks and higher prices for these. But some 6 mb/d of oil products used to be exported through the Strait of Hormuz. And it may not be so easy to ramp up refinery activity across the world to compensate. Especially as Ukraine continues to damage Russian refineries as well as Russian crude production and export facilities.
Watch oil product stocks and prices as well as Brent calendar 2027. What to watch for this summer is thus oil product inventories falling and oil product premiums to crude rising. Another measure to watch is the Brent crude 2027 contract as it rises steadily day by day as the Strait of Hormuz stays closed and global oil inventories decline. The latter is close to the highest level since the start of the war and keeps rising.
The Brent M1 contract and the Brent 2027 prices and current price of jet fuel in Europe (ARA). All in USD/b
Our back of the envelope calculation of the global shortage created by the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Note that 3.5 mb/d of discharge from SPR is also a draw. Note also that ’Forced demand loss’ of 2.5 mb/d is probably temporary and will fall back towards zero as logistics are sorted out leaving ’Price demand loss’ to do the job of balancing the market. Thus a shortfall of at least 9 mb/d created by the closure. More if SPR discharge is included and more if Forced demand loss recedes.
Brent is climbing higher. Front-month is at USD 106.3/bl this morning, close to a weekly high and a USD 9/bl jump from Mondays open. This is the move we flagged as a risk earlier in the week: the market shifting from ”a deal is around the corner” to ”this is going to take longer than we thought”.
Analyst Commodities, SEB
During April, rest-of-year Brent remained remarkably stable around USD 90/bl. A stability which rested on one single assumption: the SoH reopens around 1 May. That assumption is now slowly falling apart.
As we highlighted yesterday: every week of delay beyond 1 May adds (theoretically) ish USD 5/bl to the rest-of-year average, as global inventories draw 100 million barrels per week. i.e., a mid-May reopening implies rest-of-year Brent closer to USD 100/bl, and anything pushing into June or July takes us meaningfully higher.
What’s changed in the last 48 hours:
#1: The US military has formally warned that clearing suspected sea mines from SoH could take up to six months. That is a completely different timescale from what the financial market is pricing. Even a political deal tomorrow does not immediately reopen the strait.
#2: Trump has shifted his tone from urgency to ”strategic patience”. In yesterday’s press conference: ”Don’t rush me… I want a great deal.” The market is reading this as a president no longer feeling pressured by timelines, with the naval blockade running in the background.
#3: So far, the military activity is escalating, not de-escalating. Axios reports Iran is laying more mines in SoH. The US 3rd carrier strike group (USS George H.W. Bush) is arriving with two countermine vessels. Trump yesterday ordered the US Navy to destroy any Iranian boats caught laying mines. While CNN reports that the Pentagon is actively drawing up plans to strike Iranian SoH capabilities and individual Iranian military leaders if the ceasefire collapses. i.e., NOT a attitude consistent with an imminent deal!
Spot crude and product prices eased off the early-April highs on a combination of system rerouting and deal optimism. Both now weakening. Goldman estimates April Gulf output is reduced by 14.5 mbl/d, or 57% of pre-war supply, a number that keeps getting worse the longer this drags on.
Demand-side adaptation is ongoing: S. Korea has cut its Middle East crude dependence from 69% to 56% by pulling more from the Americas and Africa, and Japan is kicking off a second round of SPR releases from 1 May. But SPRs are finite.
Ref. to the negotiations, we should not bet on speed. The current Iranian leadership is dominated by genuine hardliners willing to absorb economic pain and run the clock to extract concessions. That is not a setup for a rapid resolution. US/Israeli media briefings keep framing the delay as ”internal Iranian divisions”, the reality is more complicated and points toward weeks and months, not days.
Our point is that the complexity is large, and higher prices have only just started (given a scenario where the negotiations drag out in time). The market spent April leaning on the USD 90/bl rest-of-year assumption; that case is diminishing by the hour. If ”early May reopening” is replaced by ”June, July or later” over the next week or two, both crude and products have meaningful room to reprice higher from here. There is a high risk being short energy and betting on any immediate political resolution(!).
Down on Friday. Up on Monday. The Brent June crude oil contract traded down 5.1% last week to a close of $90.38/b. It reached a high of $103.87/b last Monday and a low of $86.09/b on Friday as Iran announced that the Strait of Hormuz was fully open for transit. That quickly changed over the weekend as the US upheld its blockade of Iranian oil exports while Iran naturally responded by closing the SoH again. The US blew a hole in the engine room of the Iranian ship TOUSKA and took custody of the ship on Sunday. Brent crude is up 5.6% this morning to $95.4/b.
The cease-fire is expiring tomorrow. The US has said it will send a delegation for a second round of negotiations in Islamabad in Pakistan. But Iran has for now rejected a second round of talks as it views US demands as unrealistic and excessive while the US is also blocking the Strait of Hormuz.
While Brent is up 5% this morning, the financial market is still very optimistic that progress will be made. That talks will continue and that the SoH will fully open by the start of May which is consistent with a rest-of-year average Brent crude oil price of around $90/b with the market now trading that balance at around $88/b.
Financial optimism vs. physical deterioration. We have a divergence where the financial market is trading negotiations, improvements and resolution while at the same time the physical market is deteriorating day by day. Physical oil flows remain constrained by disrupted flows, longer voyage times and elevated freight and insurance costs.
Financial markets are betting that a US/Iranian resolution will save us in time from violent shortages down the road. But every day that the SoH remains closed is bringing us closer to a potentially very painful point of shortages and much higher prices.
The US blockade is also a weapon of leverage against its European and Asian allies. When Iran closed the SoH it held the world economy as a hostage against the US. The US blockade of the SoH is of course blocking Iranian oil exports. But it is also an action of disruption directed towards Europe and Asia. The US has called for the rest of the world to engaged in the war with Iran: ”If you want oil from the Persian Gulf, then go and get it”. A risk is that the US plays brinkmanship with the global oil market directed towards its European and Asian allies and maybe even towards China to force them to engage and take part. Maybe unthinkable. But unthinkable has become the norm with Trump in the White House.
Oil product price pain is set to rise as the Strait of Hormuz stays closed into summer
Solkraften pressar elpriserna dagtid
Michel Gubel ger sin syn på oljemarknaden
Svag vårflod dubblar elpriserna
